Skip to content

GRAFTECH INTERNATIONAL LTD (EAF)

Industrials · specialty chemicals / industrial materials · NYSE

A manufacturer of graphite electrodes critical for the electric arc furnace steelmaking process.

What GRAFTECH INTERNATIONAL LTD does

GrafTech International manufactures graphite electrodes that are essential to the production of electric arc furnace (EAF) steel. The company operates vertically integrated facilities and supplies its products to steel producers globally, relying on inputs like petroleum needle coke and decant oil.

Themes: steel manufacturing infrastructure, EAF steel industry supply chain, industrial commodity cycles

Fundamentals

  • Price$8.85 as of 2026-10-08 close
  • Market cap$231M as of 2026-07-17 (share count; price 2026-10-08)
  • 1-year return-49.7% 2025-10-08 close $17.60 → 2026-10-08 close $8.85
  • P/En/a negative earnings
  • Net margin-43.6% FY2025, SEC XBRL
  • Gross margin-3.1% FY2025, SEC XBRL
  • Debt / equity57.16 as of 2026-09-03
  • Revenue growth (YoY)+0.9% as of 2026-09-03
  • Revenue CAGR (3y)-26.7% SEC XBRL
  • Beta1.90 as of 2026-09-03
  • Last reported earnings2026-07-24 SEC EDGAR Form 8-K (Item 2.02)

Dividend: yield +1.6%; 1-year non-decreasing per-share dividend streak (SEC XBRL).

Ask why EAF looks like this →

How EAF compares in its sector

  • net profit marginbottom 10% 417 covered Industrials peers, as of 2026-09-03
  • operating marginbottom 25% 392 covered Industrials peers, as of 2026-09-03
  • gross marginbottom 10% 253 covered Industrials peers, as of 2026-09-03
  • 3-year revenue CAGRbottom 10% 428 covered Industrials peers
  • indicated dividend yieldmiddle range 271 covered Industrials peers, as of 2026-09-03
  • free cash flow (absolute dollars, latest fiscal year)bottom 10% 417 covered Industrials peers, as of FY2025

Position among covered Industrials companies that report each metric (minimum 5 peers). A relative position within our covered catalog — not a valuation, quality, or investment judgment. A higher percentile is simply a higher value (for P/E, more expensive on earnings — never "better"). Informational only.

Ask how EAF stacks up against peers →

Dividend coverage

Not assessed — last reported dividend predates the accounts. The most recent fiscal year in which EAF reported a dividend payment is FY2023, while its reported financial statements run through FY2025. Coverage is therefore not assessed for the latest year — an FY2023 ratio would not describe EAF today.

Coverage is derived from reported SEC EDGAR XBRL figures, comparing dividends paid against net income and free cash flow for the SAME fiscal year. It is not shown here because the latest fiscal year with a reported dividend payment (FY2023) is older than the latest year of reported financial statements (FY2025), so any ratio would describe an out-of-date year. Informational only — not financial advice.

Ask whether EAF's dividend is covered →

How GRAFTECH INTERNATIONAL LTD looks technically

GRAFTECH INTERNATIONAL LTD (EAF) is trading 2.8% below its 200-day average, the long-term trend line — a long-term downtrend. Its 50-day average crossed below its 200-day average about 147 trading days ago — a "death cross", a bearish long-term signal. There is no clear trend right now — the price is choppy (ADX, a 0–100 trend-strength gauge, is 18, below the 25 that marks a real trend). Momentum is neutral — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 52, neither overbought (above 70) nor oversold (below 30). MACD, a trend-momentum gauge, turned bearish about 6 trading days ago (its momentum flipped negative). It made a new 20-day high about 12 trading days ago. It is 56.4% below its highest point of the past year.

Trend

8
Distance from the 200-dayit is trading 2.8% below its 200-day average, the long-term trend line — a long-term downtrend-2.8%
50-day moving averageits average price over the last 50 trading days — a short-term trend line — is $7.84$7.84
200-day moving averageits average price over the last 200 trading days — the long-term trend line — is $9.11$9.11
Swing structureeach recent peak has been higher than the one before it and each dip has been shallower — the pattern chart-watchers call an uptrend, which describes where price has already been and not where it goes nexthigher highs and higher lows
Last swing turnits last significant turn was a swing low 7 calendar days ago — the swings before that are what the structure reading is measured on7 sessions
Wave structureits recent swings can be read as a five-part upward sequence — what Elliott-wave chartists call an impulse — now in leg 3 of five; the labelling fails if price closes below 7.75. It is one of several labellings that fit, and it describes the swings already printed, not what comes next. The same swings also read as a three-part correction in leg C.possible upward five-wave sequence, in wave 3 (one of several readings)
Since the 50/200 crossits 50-day average crossed below its 200-day average about 147 trading days ago — a "death cross", a bearish long-term signal147 sessions
Trend strength (14-day ADX)there is no clear trend right now — the price is choppy (ADX, a 0–100 trend-strength gauge, is 18, below the 25 that marks a real trend)17.8

Momentum

3
14-day RSImomentum is neutral — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 52, neither overbought (above 70) nor oversold (below 30)51.8
Position in its 14-day rangeit is trading in the lower half of its 14-day range ($7.75 to $11.89) — its "stochastic" reading is 27 out of 100, where 0 would mean closing exactly at the 14-session low and 100 exactly at the high. This measures WHERE the price sits inside its recent range, which is a different question from the RSI beside it: RSI is a momentum gauge, measuring how FAST the price has been moving, so a stock can drift quietly to the bottom of its range with an ordinary RSI, or fall sharply and still sit in the middle. It has been slipping within that range over the last few sessions.26.6
Since the MACD crossed zeroMACD, a trend-momentum gauge, turned bearish about 6 trading days ago (its momentum flipped negative)6 sessions

Range

12
52-week highits highest closing price over the past year (about 252 trading days) was $20.29$20.29
From the 52-week highit is 56.4% below its 52-week high (its highest price of the past year)-56.4%
Above the 52-week lowit is 79.9% above its 52-week low (its lowest price of the past year)+79.9%
Below the 52-week highit is 56.4% below its highest point of the past year56.4%
Since a 20-day breakoutit made a new 20-day high about 12 trading days ago12 sessions
Since a 55-day breakoutit made a new 55-day high about 12 trading days ago12 sessions
All-time highits highest closing price on record is $243.64 (set on 2018-08-03)$243.64
Given back of the 52-week moveover the past year its closes ranged ($5.23 to $19.82), and it has recovered roughly a quarter of its fall from last year’s high — 25% of it. Chart-watchers call 61.8%-65% given back the "golden pocket" — for this company that is $14.25 to $14.71. It is watched widely enough that orders cluster there, which is the honest reason it matters; it is not a forecast.24.8%
From the all-time highit is 96.4% below its all-time high-96.4%
Nearest price levelit is trading 9.3% above a support level at $8.03 — a price it turned at four times since 2025-04-25, most recently on 2026-07-16. Since 2024-10-08 it has 5 such levels below the current price and 8 above. Levels like these describe where the price has reversed or paused before; they are not a forecast of where it will go.-9.3%
All-time lowits lowest closing price on record is $4.92 (set on 2026-03-09)$4.92
Above the all-time lowit is 79.9% above its all-time low+79.9%

Volatility

5
Band width vs its own 6 monthsday-to-day price swings are unusually wide versus its own recent history (wider than about 83% of the past ~6 months)83rd percentile
Typical daily rangein a typical session it travels about $0.9172 between its high and its low — about 10.4% of its price. That is its "average true range" over the last 14 sessions, which also counts the distance from the previous close, so a day that opens well away from yesterday counts as the large move it was$0.9172
Bollinger bands (20-day, ±2σ)most of its recent trading has stayed between about $6.24 and $11.68 — the "Bollinger bands", a range drawn two standard deviations either side of its 20-day average price, which widens when the stock gets more volatile and narrows when it settles$6.24 – $8.96 – $11.68
Typical daily range (% of price)its price moves about 10.4% in a typical session — among the most volatile in the catalog. This is the average gap between a session's high and low over the last 14 sessions, counting overnight moves, expressed against the current price so it can be compared with companies trading at any price10.4%
Stretch from the 200-day averageit is trading 0.3 daily ranges below its 200-day average price (2.8% below it in plain percentage terms) — a way of asking how far it has stretched from its own average in units of how far it normally moves in a day, so a calm company and a jumpy one can be compared on the same scale0.3 daily ranges below its 200-day average

Volume

1
Volume vs its 30-day averagetrading volume is about normal versus its 30-day average0.81×

Analyst

2
Change in the average price targetanalysts' average price target is unchanged from the prior reading0.0%
Change in the consensus ratingthe analyst consensus rating is unchanged since the prior readingunchanged

Candlestick patterns

2
Since a bullish engulfing5 sessions ago it opened below the previous session's close and finished above that session's open — a "bullish engulfing" pair, where one up day more than undid the down day before it5 sessions ago
Since a bearish engulfing3 sessions ago it opened above the previous session's close and finished below that session's open — a "bearish engulfing" pair, where one down day more than undid the up day before it3 sessions ago

Price gaps

3
Gap at the openit opened on 2026-10-08 0.7% below the previous session's close — an overnight gap, the part of the move that happened while the market was shut, and traded back through that level before the close-0.7%
Open gapit gapped 2.0% below the previous close 1 session ago and has not traded back through the level it left behind at 9.4 — an "unfilled gap", which describes a price range no trade has since crossed and is not a forecast that it will be crossed-2.0%
Gap filleda 2.3% gap up opened on 2026-10-02 has been "filled" 4 sessions ago — price traded back through the level the gap left behind, and it closed again during the very session that opened it4 sessions ago

Price streaks

1
Closing streakit closed higher in its latest session, after a session that did not close higher — a single up day rather than a run1 session up

Relative strength

4
vs market, 1 monthover the past 1 month this stock beat the market by 39.4 percentage points (the stock gained 40.5% while the market gained 1.0%)+39.4%
vs market, 3 monthsover the past 3 months this stock beat the market by 49.3 percentage points (the stock gained 53.1% while the market gained 3.8%)+49.3%
vs market, 6 monthsover the past 6 months this stock beat the market by 11.4 percentage points (the stock gained 28.8% while the market gained 17.5%)+11.4%
vs market, 12 monthsover the past 12 months this stock lagged the market by 64.7 percentage points (the stock lost 49.7% while the market gained 15.0%)-64.7%

Signal agreement

2
Bullish technical signals2 of the 9 technical signals we can compute for it are currently in a bullish state: outperforming the market over 6 months, trading above the Ichimoku cloud — these describe past price behaviour, not a forecast2 of 9
Bearish technical signals3 of the 9 technical signals we can compute for it are currently in a bearish state: a "death cross" — its 50-day average is below its 200-day, trading below its 200-day average, MACD momentum is negative — these describe past price behaviour, not a forecast3 of 9

Trend (Ichimoku cloud)

1
Vs the Ichimoku cloudtrading 23% above the Ichimoku cloud — a band drawn from where its own highs and lows sat up to 2026-09-01 and projected forward over today's price, the side traders read as an established uptrend, with the band below acting as the level that would have to give way. The band itself is moderate, spanning 4.3% of the share price.+23.3%

Volume-weighted price

2
Vs this year’s average price paidthe price is 4% above the average price paid so far this year, so the typical buyer over that stretch is showing a gain. That average is $8.49 — a volume-weighted average of daily closes over 190 sessions, not a true tick-by-tick VWAP.+4.3%
Vs the average paid since it last reportedthe price is 9% above the average price paid since it last reported on 2026-07-24 (its 10-Q), so the typical buyer over that stretch is showing a gain. That average is $8.15 — a volume-weighted average of daily closes over 54 sessions, not a true tick-by-tick VWAP.+8.6%

Price levels it has turned at before

EAF last closed at $8.85 on 2026-10-08. Since 2024-10-08 it has turned at 5 prices below its last close and 8 above; the 3 nearest below and the 3 nearest above are listed, nearest first.

LevelSideDistanceEvidence
$8.03Support9.3% below the last closeturned there four times · 2025-04-25 to 2026-07-16
$9.84Resistance11.2% above the last closeturned there twice · 2025-02-12 to 2026-04-23
$7.70Support13.0% below the last closeturned there twice · 2025-09-11 to 2026-10-01
$7.53Support15.0% below the last closeturned there twice · 2025-04-14 to 2026-03-02
$11.21Resistance26.6% above the last closeturned there three times · 2025-07-25 to 2026-06-02
$11.44Resistance29.2% above the last closeturned there twice · 2025-03-25 to 2025-11-07

A level is a price this company reversed or paused at more than once — they describe past behaviour, not a forecast of where the price will go.

Wave structure

Its recent swings can be read as a five-part upward sequence — what Elliott-wave chartists call an impulse — now in leg 3 of five.

This labelling fails — stops being a possible reading at all — if it closes below $7.75.

This is one of several labellings that fit the same swings, so treat it as a reading rather than the reading. It was chosen from 2 labellings that survived the rules, counting shorter readings of the same bars.

On past moves of this shape the leg has usually ended somewhere between $13.93 and $17.75 — that is where it has tended to end if the count holds, not a forecast of where the price goes.

Alternate reading: The same swings also read as a three-part correction in leg C, which fails on a close below $7.75.

This reading has stood for 1 trading day, since 2026-10-08.

Read from daily closes as of 2026-10-08.

An Elliott-wave count describes the swings already printed and the level that would disprove it. It is not a forecast, a target, or advice.

Based on daily closing prices as of 2026-10-08. Describes past price behavior only — informational, not financial advice.

Ask about EAF's technicals →

Analyst consensus

  • Consensus ratingHold (2.75 mean, 1=Strong Buy…5=Strong Sell) — 2 analysts
  • Mean price target$8.00 range $7.00 – $9.00

Analyst estimates, as of 2026-10-08. These are third-party analyst opinions and price targets, aggregated — not a recommendation, prediction, or advice from stocks-llm. Informational only.

Analyst EPS estimate for EAF

  • Consensus EPS estimate-$1.48 next reporting period, as of 2026-10-08
  • Estimate change, 30 days$0.00 from -$1.48, on 2026-09-03, 35-day window
  • Readings revised upward0% of 9 comparable readings

The consensus estimate for the next reporting period, and how it has moved between readings of that SAME period. A change is measured only between readings estimating one period — when a company reports, the consensus moves to the next quarter and the two numbers are not comparable. Informational only, not a forecast and not advice.

Ask how EAF's estimates have moved →

Key risks (from latest filing)

["High dependence on the cyclical global steel industry and EAF steel production specifically.","Significant exposure to volatility in raw material costs (petroleum needle coke, decant oil) and energy prices.","Risk of persistent industry overcapacity leading to depressed product pricing and potential for continued net losses."]

See EAF's biggest risks from its latest 10-Q →

What changed in the latest 10-Q

AI-assisted comparison of EAF's 10-Q filed 2026-07-24 against the prior one filed 2026-05-01.

Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)

  • Added:
    • Newer filing (2026-07-24) adds second-quarter 2026 sales volume of 30.8 thousand MT, an 8% increase compared to second quarter 2025, and notes production volume exceeded sales volume for the first six months of 2026 with expectation to balance production and sales volume on a full-year basis.
    • Newer filing (2026-07-24) adds second-quarter 2026 weighted-average realized price of approximately $3,900 per MT, a 7% decrease compared to second quarter 2025, with 29% sales volume growth in the United States.
    • Newer filing (2026-07-24) adds second-quarter 2026 production volume of 33.4 thousand MT resulting in a capacity utilization rate of 74%, up from 65% for second quarter 2025.
    • Newer filing (2026-07-24) adds that global steel demand outside of China is projected to grow modestly in 2026, with a 6% increase in U.S. steel production year-to-date.
    • Newer filing (2026-07-24) adds that more than 90% of anticipated volume is already committed in the order book, compared to more than 85% in the older filing.
    • Newer filing (2026-07-24) adds that since announcing price increases near the end of the first quarter of 2026, the company secured new customer commitments at weighted-average prices more than 15% above comparable commitments entered into during the first quarter of 2026.
    • Newer filing (2026-07-24) adds that reflecting ongoing cost improvement initiatives, the company expects to offset geopolitical input cost headwinds.
    • Newer filing (2026-07-24) adds that during the second quarter of 2026, the company drew the remaining $100 million available under the delayed draw first lien term loan facility prior to the July 23, 2026 expiration.
    • Newer filing (2026-07-24) adds liquidity of $253.0 million as of June 30, 2026, consisting of $145.4 million cash and cash equivalents and $107.6 million availability under the 2018 Revolving Credit Facility, and total debt of approximately $1.2 billion.
    • Newer filing (2026-07-24) adds key financial measures for the three and six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, including net sales, net loss, loss per share, EBITDA, adjusted net loss, adjusted loss per share and adjusted EBITDA.
  • Removed:
    • Older filing (2026-05-01) contains first-quarter 2026 sales volume of 28.1 thousand MT and a 14% increase compared to first quarter 2025, which is not in the newer filing.
    • Older filing (2026-05-01) contains first-quarter 2026 weighted-average realized price of approximately $3,900 per MT, a 5% decrease compared to first quarter 2025, with 37% sales volume growth in the United States, which is not in the newer filing.
    • Older filing (2026-05-01) contains first-quarter 2026 production volume of 29.4 thousand MT and a capacity utilization rate of 65%, which is not in the newer filing.
    • Older filing (2026-05-01) contains liquidity of $328.7 million as of March 31, 2026, consisting of $120.2 million cash and cash equivalents, $108.5 million availability under the 2018 Revolving Credit Facility and $100.0 million availability under the Initial First Lien Term Loan Facility, and total debt of approximately $1.1 billion, which is not in the newer filing.
    • Older filing (2026-05-01) contains key financial measures for the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025, including net sales, net loss, loss per share, EBITDA, adjusted net loss, adjusted loss per share and adjusted EBITDA, which are not in the newer filing.
    • Older filing (2026-05-01) contains key operating measures for the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025, including sales volume, production volume, production capacity and capacity utilization, which are not in the newer filing.
  • Reworded:
    • Newer filing (2026-07-24) states the pricing decline reflected 'favorable mix as we achieved 29% sales volume growth in the United States' compared to older filing (2026-05-01) which stated 'favorable mix as we achieved 37% sales volume growth in the United States.'
    • Newer filing (2026-07-24) states 'While production volume has exceeded sales volume for the first six months of 2026, our expectation remains to balance our production and sales volume levels on a full-year basis' whereas older filing (2026-05-01) did not include this statement for the first quarter.
    • Newer filing (2026-07-24) describes U.S. demand as 'modest demand growth, coupled with favorable trade policies, has driven a 6% increase in steel production year-to-date' whereas older filing (2026-05-01) described U.S. demand as 'relatively stable and is expected to increase modestly, with steel production further supported by favorable trade policies.'
    • Newer filing (2026-07-24) describes Europe as 'steel production is flat year-to-date, the steel market outlook is improving reflecting recently approved increases in trade protections' whereas older filing (2026-05-01) described Europe as 'steel industry conditions have been more challenged, though there are early signs of recovery, including expected demand growth and recently approved increases in trade protections.'
    • Newer filing (2026-07-24) states 'we continue to gain market share' in connection with sales volume outlook, which is not present in older filing (2026-05-01).
    • Newer filing (2026-07-24) states 'we are taking deliberate actions' and 'the previously announced price increases' whereas older filing (2026-05-01) stated 'implementing price increases' without the word 'previously announced.'
    • Newer filing (2026-07-24) states 'continuing to optimize our order book by prioritizing higher-value regions while foregoing volume opportunities' whereas older filing (2026-05-01) stated 'continuing to optimize our order book by prioritizing higher-value regions and foregoing volume opportunities.'
    • Newer filing (2026-07-24) states 'we expect to offset these headwinds' regarding costs, whereas older filing (2026-05-01) stated 'we are expanding initiatives to improve our cost structure, including enhancing production efficiency and optimizing production schedules.'
    • Newer filing (2026-07-24) states 'we believe the actions we are taking, combined with our vertical integration and industry-leading capabilities, position GrafTech to generate stronger financial performance as market conditions normalize' whereas older filing (2026-05-01) stated 'we believe the actions we are taking, combined with our vertical integration and a leading competitive position, will enable GrafTech to benefit as market conditions normalize.'
    • Newer filing (2026-07-24) uses 'We continue to anticipate our full-year capital expenditures' whereas older filing (2026-05-01) uses 'We continue to anticipate our full-year capital expenditures' (same wording, no change).
  • Notes:
    • The newer filing text ends mid-sentence with 'see "—Critical accou' and the older filing text contains the complete 'Key operating measures' section including a table; therefore some changes beyond the truncation point cannot be assessed.

Risk Factors

  • Added:
    • In the filing dated 2026-07-24, the Risk Factors section states there have been no material changes to the Risk Factors disclosed in the Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on February 13, 2026.
  • Removed:
    • In the filing dated 2026-05-01, the Risk Factors section included the sentence: 'You should not interpret the disclosure of any risk factor to imply that the risk has not already materialized.' This sentence does not appear in the filing dated 2026-07-24.

AI-assisted comparison of two SEC filing sections. It describes wording and theme changes only, makes no materiality, legal, or investment judgement, and is not financial advice. Informational only — not financial advice.

Ask what changed in EAF's latest 10-Q →

Insider activity (SEC Form 4)

No open-market insider purchases or sales are on record for EAF — recent Form 4 activity was compensation-related (awards, option exercises, or tax withholding), not open-market buying or selling.

View full insider trading history → View SEC Form 3/4/5 filings

Only open-market purchases (SEC code P) and sales (code S) are counted here. Option exercises, vesting/awards, gifts, and shares withheld for taxes are excluded — they are compensation or mechanical, not open-market conviction. Sales may be planned and non-discretionary (e.g. a Rule 10b5-1 plan) and are not necessarily bearish; open-market buying is not a recommendation to buy. Informational only — not financial advice.

Institutional ownership (13F)

5 institutional 13F filers reported holding EAF as of 2026-06-30 (quarter-end position, filed within 45 days).

  • Distinct 13F filers 5
  • Reported shares held 1,935,383
  • Reported value $11,438,115

reported quarterly holdings change (2026-03-31 → 2026-06-30): 0 new, 4 increased, 1 decreased, 0 exited. Change counts cover only managers that filed 13F reports in BOTH quarters, derived between two quarter-end snapshots — not same-day trades; a single manager is never said to have "bought" or "sold".

Institutional holdings are quarter-end long positions reported on SEC Form 13F-HR, filed up to 45 days after the quarter ends — they are delayed, are not real-time trades, exclude short positions and most non-US securities, and are not investment advice. Any increase/decrease is a reported change between two quarterly snapshots, not a same-day purchase or sale. These are quarter-end snapshots from the 13F filings on SEC EDGAR, filed within 45 days — not real-time, and any change is a difference between two quarterly reports, not a same-day trade. Informational only — not financial advice.

Ask about EAF's institutional holders → See what each manager we track holds →

Short interest (FINRA)

EAF had 1,541,128 shares of reported short interest as of the 2026-09-15 FINRA settlement date (delayed, bi-monthly; not real-time).

EAF had 5.91% of its shares outstanding sold short as of the 2026-09-15 FINRA settlement date (percent of FLOAT would be higher — float is not disclosed in the source). FINRA reported 2.69 days to cover at the same settlement.

  • Reported short interest (shares) 1,541,128
  • Short interest (% of shares outstanding) 5.91%
  • Prior settlement (shares) 1,495,684
  • Reported change 3.04%
  • Days to cover (reported) 2.69

Reported to FINRA as of the 2026-09-15 settlement date. Short interest is reported to FINRA and published on a delayed, bi-monthly schedule (as of a settlement date, disseminated roughly eight business days later) — it is NOT real-time, does not cover every venue or all US trading, and is not a short-squeeze prediction or investment advice. Days-to-cover is the value FINRA reports; percent of float is not shown because the source file carries no share-count denominator — where a percent appears it is of shares OUTSTANDING, the larger base, and is therefore a floor on percent of float. Informational only — not financial advice.

Ask about EAF's short interest →

Competitors & peers

  • Showa Denko (now Resonac)
  • Tokai Carbon
  • Fangda Carbon
  • HEG Limited

AI-enriched competitor set. Linked names are companies covered by stocks-llm; other named peers are shown for reference only.

Not quite? Describe exactly what you want →

Frequently asked questions

What does GRAFTECH INTERNATIONAL LTD (EAF) do?

GrafTech International manufactures graphite electrodes that are essential to the production of electric arc furnace (EAF) steel. The company operates vertically integrated facilities and supplies its products to steel producers globally, relying on inputs like petroleum needle coke and decant oil.

What sector is GRAFTECH INTERNATIONAL LTD (EAF) in?

GRAFTECH INTERNATIONAL LTD (EAF) is classified in the Industrials sector. Its industry is specialty chemicals / industrial materials. It trades on NYSE.

Does EAF pay a dividend?

Yes — GRAFTECH INTERNATIONAL LTD (EAF) pays a dividend, with an indicated yield of about 1.60% and 1-year non-decreasing per-share dividend streak (SEC EDGAR XBRL) (market data, as of 2026-09-03). Informational only — not financial advice.

Who are GRAFTECH INTERNATIONAL LTD's (EAF) competitors?

Notable peers of GRAFTECH INTERNATIONAL LTD (EAF) include Showa Denko (now Resonac), Tokai Carbon, Fangda Carbon and HEG Limited. This peer set is informational only — not financial advice.

Is GRAFTECH INTERNATIONAL LTD (EAF) overbought or oversold right now?

GRAFTECH INTERNATIONAL LTD (EAF) is currently neither overbought nor oversold — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 52, in the neutral middle (as of 2026-10-08). RSI describes recent price momentum, not a forecast — informational only, not financial advice.

Where does stocks-llm's data on EAF come from?

Fundamentals come from SEC XBRL company filings for the figures marked with a fiscal year, and market data, as of 2026-09-03 for the rest; prices are market data, as of 2026-09-03; company filings and profile facts come from SEC EDGAR. All figures are delayed daily-close data shown with their as-of date — informational only, not financial advice.

Fundamentals: SEC XBRL company filings for the figures marked with a fiscal year, and market data, as of 2026-09-03 for the rest. Filings: SEC EDGAR. Prices are delayed daily-close data.

Last updated 2026-10-08.

Informational only — NOT financial advice. All figures are delayed daily-close data from SEC EDGAR & market data, shown with their as-of date.