Skip to content

GRAFTECH INTERNATIONAL LTD (EAF)

Industrials · specialty chemicals / industrial materials · NYSE

A manufacturer of graphite electrodes critical for the electric arc furnace steelmaking process.

What GRAFTECH INTERNATIONAL LTD does

GrafTech International manufactures graphite electrodes that are essential to the production of electric arc furnace (EAF) steel. The company operates vertically integrated facilities and supplies its products to steel producers globally, relying on inputs like petroleum needle coke and decant oil.

Themes: steel manufacturing infrastructure, EAF steel industry supply chain, industrial commodity cycles

Fundamentals

  • Price$6.46 as of 2026-08-24 close
  • Market cap$169M as of 2026-08-24
  • 1-year return-33.5% 2025-08-22 close $9.71 → 2026-08-24 close $6.46
  • P/En/a negative earnings
  • Net margin-34.6% as of 2026-08-24
  • Gross margin-5.7% as of 2026-08-24
  • ROE-271.4% as of 2026-08-24
  • Debt / equity57.16 as of 2026-08-24
  • Revenue growth (YoY)+0.9% as of 2026-08-24
  • Revenue CAGR (3y)-26.7% SEC XBRL
  • Beta1.85 as of 2026-08-24
  • Last reported earnings2026-07-24 SEC EDGAR Form 8-K (Item 2.02)

Dividend: yield +1.6%; 1-year non-decreasing per-share dividend streak (SEC XBRL).

Ask why EAF looks like this →

How EAF compares in its sector

  • net profit marginbottom 10% 457 covered Industrials peers, as of 2026-08-24
  • operating marginbottom 10% 457 covered Industrials peers, as of 2026-08-24
  • gross marginbottom 10% 455 covered Industrials peers, as of 2026-08-24
  • return on equitybottom 10% 460 covered Industrials peers, as of 2026-08-24
  • 3-year revenue CAGRbottom 10% 426 covered Industrials peers
  • indicated dividend yieldmiddle range 267 covered Industrials peers, as of 2026-08-24
  • free cash flow (absolute dollars, latest fiscal year)bottom 10% 414 covered Industrials peers, as of FY2025

Position among covered Industrials companies that report each metric (minimum 5 peers). A relative position within our covered catalog — not a valuation, quality, or investment judgment. A higher percentile is simply a higher value (for P/E, more expensive on earnings — never "better"). Informational only.

Ask how EAF stacks up against peers →

Dividend coverage

Not assessed — last reported dividend predates the accounts. The most recent fiscal year in which EAF reported a dividend payment is FY2023, while its reported financial statements run through FY2025. Coverage is therefore not assessed for the latest year — an FY2023 ratio would not describe EAF today.

Coverage is derived from reported SEC EDGAR XBRL figures, comparing dividends paid against net income and free cash flow for the SAME fiscal year. It is not shown here because the latest fiscal year with a reported dividend payment (FY2023) is older than the latest year of reported financial statements (FY2025), so any ratio would describe an out-of-date year. Informational only — not financial advice.

Ask whether EAF's dividend is covered →

How GRAFTECH INTERNATIONAL LTD looks technically

GRAFTECH INTERNATIONAL LTD (EAF) is trading 36.1% below its 200-day average, the long-term trend line — a long-term downtrend. Its 50-day average crossed below its 200-day average about 115 trading days ago — a "death cross", a bearish long-term signal. There is no clear trend right now — the price is choppy (ADX, a 0–100 trend-strength gauge, is 16, below the 25 that marks a real trend), though sellers have been pushing harder than buyers lately — pressure, not a trend. Momentum is neutral — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 40, neither overbought (above 70) nor oversold (below 30). MACD, a trend-momentum gauge, turned bearish about 5 trading days ago (its momentum flipped negative). It just made a new 20-day low, its first since 2026-07-20, breaking below its recent trading range. It is 68.2% below its highest point of the past year.

Trend

8
Distance from the 200-dayit is trading 36.1% below its 200-day average, the long-term trend line — a long-term downtrend-36.1%
50-day moving averageits average price over the last 50 trading days — a short-term trend line — is $7.01$7.01
200-day moving averageits average price over the last 200 trading days — the long-term trend line — is $10.10$10.10
Swing structureits recent peaks and dips disagree — one of them is rising while the other is not, so there is no clean up or down pattern in the swingsmixed — one of the two is not confirming
Last swing turnits last significant turn was a swing high 14 calendar days ago — the swings before that are what the structure reading is measured on14 sessions
Wave structureits recent swings can be read as a completed three-part upward correction — a pullback in the A-B-C shape Elliott-wave chartists use; the labelling fails if price closes above 8.29. It is the only labelling that fits, though not with textbook proportions, and it describes the swings already printed, not what comes next.possible three-wave upward correction, complete (atypical proportions)
Since the 50/200 crossits 50-day average crossed below its 200-day average about 115 trading days ago — a "death cross", a bearish long-term signal115 sessions
Trend strength (14-day ADX)there is no clear trend right now — the price is choppy (ADX, a 0–100 trend-strength gauge, is 16, below the 25 that marks a real trend), though sellers have been pushing harder than buyers lately — pressure, not a trend16.4

Momentum

3
14-day RSImomentum is neutral — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 40, neither overbought (above 70) nor oversold (below 30)39.6
Position in its 14-day rangeit is trading near the bottom of its 14-day range ($6.32 to $8.29) — its "stochastic" reading is 7 out of 100, where 0 would mean closing exactly at the 14-session low and 100 exactly at the high. This measures WHERE the price sits inside its recent range, which is a different question from the RSI beside it: RSI is a momentum gauge, measuring how FAST the price has been moving, so a stock can drift quietly to the bottom of its range with an ordinary RSI, or fall sharply and still sit in the middle. It has been slipping within that range over the last few sessions.7.1
Since the MACD crossed zeroMACD, a trend-momentum gauge, turned bearish about 5 trading days ago (its momentum flipped negative)5 sessions

Range

12
52-week highits highest closing price over the past year (about 252 trading days) was $20.29$20.29
From the 52-week highit is 68.2% below its 52-week high (its highest price of the past year)-68.2%
Above the 52-week lowit is 31.3% above its 52-week low (its lowest price of the past year)+31.3%
Below the 52-week highit is 68.2% below its highest point of the past year68.2%
Since a 20-day breakoutit just made a new 20-day low, its first since 2026-07-20, breaking below its recent trading range1 session
Since a 55-day breakoutit made a new 55-day low about 35 trading days ago35 sessions
All-time highits highest closing price on record is $243.64 (set on 2018-08-03)$243.64
Given back of the 52-week moveover the past year its closes ranged ($5.23 to $19.82), and it has recovered only a small part of its fall from last year’s high — 8% of it. Chart-watchers call 61.8%-65% given back the "golden pocket" — for this company that is $14.25 to $14.71. It is watched widely enough that orders cluster there, which is the honest reason it matters; it is not a forecast.8.4%
From the all-time highit is 97.3% below its all-time high-97.3%
Nearest price levelit is trading 2.5% above a support level at $6.29 — a price it turned at twice since 2026-05-01, most recently on 2026-07-30. Since 2024-08-26 it has 3 such levels below the current price and 11 above. Levels like these describe where the price has reversed or paused before; they are not a forecast of where it will go.-2.5%
All-time lowits lowest closing price on record is $4.92 (set on 2026-03-09)$4.92
Above the all-time lowit is 31.3% above its all-time low+31.3%

Volatility

5
Band width vs its own 6 monthsday-to-day price swings are narrower than usual versus its own recent 6-month history (tighter than about 83% of it)17th percentile
Typical daily rangein a typical session it travels about $0.5594 between its high and its low — about 8.7% of its price. That is its "average true range" over the last 14 sessions, which also counts the distance from the previous close, so a day that opens well away from yesterday counts as the large move it was$0.5594
Bollinger bands (20-day, ±2σ)most of its recent trading has stayed between about $6.35 and $8.33 — the "Bollinger bands", a range drawn two standard deviations either side of its 20-day average price, which widens when the stock gets more volatile and narrows when it settles$6.35 – $7.34 – $8.33
Typical daily range (% of price)its price moves about 8.7% in a typical session — among the most volatile in the catalog. This is the average gap between a session's high and low over the last 14 sessions, counting overnight moves, expressed against the current price so it can be compared with companies trading at any price8.7%
Stretch from the 200-day averageit is trading 6.5 daily ranges below its 200-day average price (36.1% below it in plain percentage terms) — a way of asking how far it has stretched from its own average in units of how far it normally moves in a day, so a calm company and a jumpy one can be compared on the same scale6.5 daily ranges below its 200-day average

Volume

1
Volume vs its 30-day averagetrading volume is about normal versus its 30-day average0.79×

Analyst

2
Change in the average price targetanalysts' average price target is unchanged from the prior reading0.0%
Change in the consensus ratingnot available for this company yetn/a

Candlestick patterns

2
Since a doji3 sessions ago it opened and closed at almost the same price after trading through a wider range — a "doji", the classic picture of buyers and sellers finishing the session level3 sessions ago
Since a bearish engulfing8 sessions ago it opened above the previous session's close and finished below that session's open — a "bearish engulfing" pair, where one down day more than undid the up day before it8 sessions ago

Price gaps

3
Gap at the openit opened on 2026-08-24 0.6% below the previous session's close — an overnight gap, the part of the move that happened while the market was shut, and had not traded back through that level by the close-0.6%
Open gapit gapped 3.3% below the previous close 52 sessions ago and has not traded back through the level it left behind at 9.92 — an "unfilled gap", which describes a price range no trade has since crossed and is not a forecast that it will be crossed-3.3%
Gap filleda 2.4% gap up opened on 2026-08-04 has been "filled" 13 sessions ago — price traded back through the level the gap left behind, and it took 1 session to close13 sessions ago

Price streaks

1
Closing streakit closed lower in its latest session, after a session that did not close lower — a single down day rather than a run1 session down

Relative strength

4
vs market, 1 monthover the past 1 month this stock lagged the market by 16.5 percentage points (the stock lost 13.2% while the market gained 3.3%)-16.5%
vs market, 3 monthsover the past 3 months this stock lagged the market by 31.4 percentage points (the stock lost 29.0% while the market gained 2.4%)-31.4%
vs market, 6 monthsover the past 6 months this stock lagged the market by 13.0 percentage points (the stock lost 2.0% while the market gained 11.1%)-13.1%
vs market, 12 monthsover the past 12 months this stock lagged the market by 51.8 percentage points (the stock lost 33.5% while the market gained 18.3%)-51.8%

Signal agreement

2
Bullish technical signals1 of the 9 technical signals we can compute for it is currently in a bullish state: near the bottom of its 14-day range (oversold) — these describe past price behaviour, not a forecast1 of 9
Bearish technical signals6 of the 9 technical signals we can compute for it are currently in a bearish state: a "death cross" — its 50-day average is below its 200-day, trading below its 200-day average, a fresh 20-day low, MACD momentum is negative, lagging the market over 6 months, trading below the Ichimoku cloud — these describe past price behaviour, not a forecast6 of 9

Trend (Ichimoku cloud)

1
Vs the Ichimoku cloudtrading 5.0% below the Ichimoku cloud — a band drawn from where its own highs and lows sat up to 2026-07-17 and projected forward over today's price, the side traders read as an established downtrend, with the band above acting as the level that would have to be cleared. The band itself is thick, spanning 21.4% of the share price, which is taken to mean a barrier that has held for a while and takes effort to cross.-5.0%

Volume-weighted price

2
Vs this year’s average price paidthe price is 24% below the average price paid so far this year, so the typical buyer over that stretch is under water. That average is $8.52 — a volume-weighted average of daily closes over 158 sessions, not a true tick-by-tick VWAP.-24.2%
Vs the average paid since it last reportedthe price is 12% below the average price paid since it last reported on 2026-07-24 (its 10-Q), so the typical buyer over that stretch is under water. That average is $7.34 — a volume-weighted average of daily closes over 22 sessions, not a true tick-by-tick VWAP.-12.0%

Price levels it has turned at before

EAF last closed at $6.46 on 2026-08-24. Since 2024-08-26 it has turned at 3 prices below its last close and 11 above; the 3 nearest below and the 3 nearest above are listed, nearest first.

LevelSideDistanceEvidence
$6.29Support2.5% below the last closeturned there twice · 2026-05-01 to 2026-07-30
$5.87Support9.1% below the last closeturned there twice · 2024-09-06 to 2026-02-18
$5.70Support11.8% below the last closeturned there twice · 2025-04-09 to 2025-05-02
$7.53Resistance16.5% above the last closeturned there twice · 2025-04-14 to 2026-03-02
$8.03Resistance24.2% above the last closeturned there four times · 2025-04-25 to 2026-07-16
$9.84Resistance52.3% above the last closeturned there twice · 2025-02-12 to 2026-04-23

A level is a price this company reversed or paused at more than once — they describe past behaviour, not a forecast of where the price will go.

Wave structure

Its recent swings can be read as a three-part upward correction — the A-B-C shape chartists use for a pullback — now complete.

This labelling fails — stops being a possible reading at all — if it closes above $8.29.

It is the only labelling that fits these swings, though its proportions are not the textbook ones. It was chosen from 3 labellings that survived the rules, counting shorter readings of the same bars.

This labelling was already in place when we began recording count changes on 2026-08-13, so how long it has stood is not something we can say yet.

Read from daily closes as of 2026-08-24.

An Elliott-wave count describes the swings already printed and the level that would disprove it. It is not a forecast, a target, or advice.

Based on daily closing prices as of 2026-08-24. Describes past price behavior only — informational, not financial advice.

Ask about EAF's technicals →

Analyst consensus

  • Mean price target$7.25 range $7.00 – $7.50

Analyst estimates, as of 2026-08-19. These are third-party analyst opinions and price targets, aggregated — not a recommendation, prediction, or advice from stocks-llm. Informational only.

Analyst EPS estimate for EAF

  • Consensus EPS estimate-$1.48 next reporting period, as of 2026-08-19

Change over time is not available yet: it needs two readings of the same reporting period at least 30 days apart, and we have been recording these estimates since 2026-08-04. An estimate for a DIFFERENT quarter is not a revision, so a reading from before the last report is never compared with one after it.

The consensus estimate for the next reporting period, and how it has moved between readings of that SAME period. A change is measured only between readings estimating one period — when a company reports, the consensus moves to the next quarter and the two numbers are not comparable. Informational only, not a forecast and not advice.

Ask how EAF's estimates have moved →

Key risks (from latest filing)

["High dependence on the cyclical global steel industry and EAF steel production specifically.","Significant exposure to volatility in raw material costs (petroleum needle coke, decant oil) and energy prices.","Risk of persistent industry overcapacity leading to depressed product pricing and potential for continued net losses."]

See EAF's biggest risks from its latest 10-Q →

What changed in the latest 10-Q

AI-assisted comparison of EAF's 10-Q filed 2026-05-01 against the prior one filed 2025-10-24.

Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)

  • Added:
    • Newer filing (2026-05-01) adds language: 'we have a competitive portfolio' vs. older 'we have the most competitive portfolio' - represents a softening of competitive claim
    • Newer filing adds specific pricing action details: 'implementing price increases of $600 to $1,200 per metric ton on uncommitted volume'
    • Newer filing adds: 'actively supporting graphite electrode trade cases in key jurisdictions, including the United States and Brazil'
    • Newer filing adds: 'continuing to optimize our order book by prioritizing higher-value regions and foregoing volume opportunities where margins are unacceptably low'
    • Newer filing adds: 'Factoring all of this in, we continue to expect a low single-digit percentage-point decline in our cash cost of goods sold per MT for 2026'
    • Newer filing adds: 'growing demand for petroleum needle coke in battery applications' as a structural driver
    • Newer filing adds specific first quarter 2026 financial metrics table with comparative data to Q1 2025
  • Removed:
    • Older filing (2025-10-24) contained separate 'Reverse Stock Split' section explaining the 1-for-10 reverse split effective August 29, 2025; newer filing has no equivalent section, incorporating the reverse split disclosure only in footnotes
    • Older filing discusses third quarter 2025 specifically; newer filing discusses first quarter 2026 with no Q3 2025 data
    • Older filing includes outlook for 'full-year 2025' with '8-10% year-over-year increase in sales volume'; newer filing discusses 2026 with '5-10% year-over-year increase'
    • Older filing states: 'we now expect an approximate 10% year-over-year decline in our cash cost of goods sold per MT for 2025'; newer filing changes to 'low single-digit percentage-point decline' for 2026
    • Older filing states: 'For 2025, we continue to expect...capital expenditures will be approximately $40 million'; newer filing changes to '$35 million' for 2026
    • Older filing discusses European maintenance work impacting Q3 2025 capacity utilization
    • Older filing discusses petroleum needle coke demand 'driven by its utilization in producing synthetic graphite for use in lithium-ion batteries'; newer filing references 'battery applications' more broadly
  • Reworded:
    • Competitive positioning language changed from 'the most competitive portfolio of low cost ultra-high power graphite electrode manufacturing facilities in the industry' to 'a competitive portfolio of low-cost ultra-high power graphite electrode manufacturing facilities'
    • Older: 'We are the only large scale graphite electrode producer'; newer: 'We are the only large-scale graphite electrode producer' (hyphenation change only)
    • Pricing discussion shift: older focuses on 'LTA completion' and 'persistent competitive pressures'; newer emphasizes 'current industry-wide pricing levels do not reflect the indispensable nature' and active price increase implementation
    • Volume guidance reframed: older discusses achieving '8-10% year-over-year increase' for 2025; newer expects '5-10% year-over-year increase' for 2026 with 'more than 85% of our anticipated volume already committed in our order book'
    • Cost management framing: older emphasizes 'additional measures to enhance efficiency'; newer emphasizes 'expanding initiatives to improve our cost structure'
    • Working capital expectation: older states 'net impact of working capital will be favorable'; newer states 'modest increase in working capital for the full year to support higher volume'
    • Liquidity decreased: from $384.3 million (Sept 30, 2025) to $328.7 million (March 31, 2026); cash decreased from $177.6 million to $120.2 million
  • Notes:
    • Older filing covers Q3 2025 period (three months ended Sept 30, 2025); newer filing covers Q1 2026 period (three months ended March 31, 2026); these are different reporting periods with different market conditions and company performance, limiting direct comparability of operational metrics
    • Reverse stock split adjustment footnote appears in newer filing tables but the reverse split itself was announced in older filing; comparison reflects retroactive adjustment methodology differences in presentation
    • The guidance change from 10% (full-year 2025) to 5-10% (2026) guidance may reflect timing differences and market condition changes rather than pure wording adjustments

Risk Factors

  • Added:
    • Added reference to Annual Report on Form 10-K for year ended December 31, 2025 filed February 13, 2026 (newer filing dated 2026-05-01)
    • Added risk factor: 'our dependence on the cost and availability of manufacturing inputs, including raw materials, such as decant oil, petroleum needle coke, energy and freight, and disruptions in availability for such inputs' (newer filing)
    • Added phrase 'or further decline' in risk factor about selling prices and cyclical nature (newer filing)
    • Added phrase 'uncertain shifts in domestic and foreign trade policies' in tariff risk factor (newer filing)
    • Added phrase 'and trade barriers' to tariff risk factor (newer filing)
    • Added phrase 'financial condition' at end of tariff risk factor (newer filing)
    • Added risk factor: 'risks associated with strategic transactions, including acquisitions, divestitures, joint ventures, equity investments, and debt issuances, that could adversely affect our business, operating results and financial condition' (newer filing)
  • Removed:
    • Removed reference to Q2 Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for quarter ended June 30, 2025 filed July 25, 2025 (older filing dated 2025-10-24)
    • Removed reference to Annual Report on Form 10-K for year ended December 31, 2024 filed February 14, 2025 (older filing)
    • Removed risk factor: 'the possibility that restrictive covenants in our financing agreements could restrict or limit our operations' (older filing)
    • Removed risk factor: 'changes in health, safety and environmental regulations applicable to our manufacturing operations and facilities' (older filing)
  • Reworded:
    • Changed 'our market' to 'our markets' in Presentation of Financial, Market and Industry Data section (newer filing)
    • Changed cyclical nature risk from 'which may further decline in the future, and may continue to lead to prolonged periods' to 'which may remain at depressed levels or further decline in the future, and may continue to experience prolonged periods' (newer filing)
    • Changed strategy language from 'ability to effectively implement price increases' to 'ability to effectively increase or maintain existing prices' (newer filing)
    • Changed supply language from 'our dependence on the supply of raw materials, including decant oil and petroleum needle coke, and disruptions in supply chains for these materials' to 'our dependence on the cost and availability of manufacturing inputs, including raw materials, such as decant oil, petroleum needle coke, energy and freight, and disruptions in availability for such inputs' (newer filing)
    • Changed tariff risk language from 'the possibility that the imposition of current, new or increases of existing custom duties and other tariffs' to 'uncertain shifts in domestic and foreign trade policies and the possibility that the imposition of current, new or increased custom duties and tariffs and trade barriers' (newer filing)
    • Changed borrowing risk language from 'the fact that any current or future borrowings' to 'any current or future borrowings' (newer filing)
  • Notes:
    • The two filings cover different fiscal periods (March 31, 2026 vs. September 30, 2025) and reference different annual reports
    • Item numbering differs between filings (Item 2 appears in newer filing but not in comparable section of older filing)
    • Text appears truncated at end of older filing excerpt, potentially affecting complete comparison

AI-assisted comparison of two SEC filing sections. It describes wording and theme changes only, makes no materiality, legal, or investment judgement, and is not financial advice. Informational only — not financial advice.

Ask what changed in EAF's latest 10-Q →

Insider activity (SEC Form 4)

No open-market insider purchases or sales are on record for EAF — recent Form 4 activity was compensation-related (awards, option exercises, or tax withholding), not open-market buying or selling.

View full insider trading history → View SEC Form 3/4/5 filings

Only open-market purchases (SEC code P) and sales (code S) are counted here. Option exercises, vesting/awards, gifts, and shares withheld for taxes are excluded — they are compensation or mechanical, not open-market conviction. Sales may be planned and non-discretionary (e.g. a Rule 10b5-1 plan) and are not necessarily bearish; open-market buying is not a recommendation to buy. Informational only — not financial advice.

Institutional ownership (13F)

5 institutional 13F filers reported holding EAF as of 2026-03-31 (quarter-end position, filed within 45 days).

  • Distinct 13F filers 5
  • Reported shares held 587,978
  • Reported value $3,986,490

reported quarterly holdings change (2025-12-31 → 2026-03-31): 1 new, 1 increased, 2 decreased, 0 exited. Change counts cover only managers that filed 13F reports in BOTH quarters, derived between two quarter-end snapshots — not same-day trades; a single manager is never said to have "bought" or "sold".

Institutional holdings are quarter-end long positions reported on SEC Form 13F-HR, filed up to 45 days after the quarter ends — they are delayed, are not real-time trades, exclude short positions and most non-US securities, and are not investment advice. Any increase/decrease is a reported change between two quarterly snapshots, not a same-day purchase or sale. These are quarter-end snapshots from the 13F filings on SEC EDGAR, filed within 45 days — not real-time, and any change is a difference between two quarterly reports, not a same-day trade. Informational only — not financial advice.

Ask about EAF's institutional holders →

Short interest (FINRA)

EAF had 1,116,944 shares of reported short interest as of the 2026-07-31 FINRA settlement date (delayed, bi-monthly; not real-time).

EAF had 4.28% of its shares outstanding sold short as of the 2026-07-31 FINRA settlement date (percent of FLOAT would be higher — float is not disclosed in the source). FINRA reported 2.68 days to cover at the same settlement.

  • Reported short interest (shares) 1,116,944
  • Short interest (% of shares outstanding) 4.28%
  • Prior settlement (shares) 1,280,952
  • Reported change -12.8%
  • Days to cover (reported) 2.68

Reported to FINRA as of the 2026-07-31 settlement date. Short interest is reported to FINRA and published on a delayed, bi-monthly schedule (as of a settlement date, disseminated roughly eight business days later) — it is NOT real-time, does not cover every venue or all US trading, and is not a short-squeeze prediction or investment advice. Days-to-cover is the value FINRA reports; percent of float is not shown because the source file carries no share-count denominator — where a percent appears it is of shares OUTSTANDING, the larger base, and is therefore a floor on percent of float. Informational only — not financial advice.

Ask about EAF's short interest →

Competitors & peers

  • Showa Denko (now Resonac)
  • Tokai Carbon
  • Fangda Carbon
  • HEG Limited

AI-enriched competitor set. Linked names are companies covered by stocks-llm; other named peers are shown for reference only.

Not quite? Describe exactly what you want →

Frequently asked questions

What does GRAFTECH INTERNATIONAL LTD (EAF) do?

GrafTech International manufactures graphite electrodes that are essential to the production of electric arc furnace (EAF) steel. The company operates vertically integrated facilities and supplies its products to steel producers globally, relying on inputs like petroleum needle coke and decant oil.

What sector is GRAFTECH INTERNATIONAL LTD (EAF) in?

GRAFTECH INTERNATIONAL LTD (EAF) is classified in the Industrials sector. Its industry is specialty chemicals / industrial materials. It trades on NYSE.

Does EAF pay a dividend?

Yes — GRAFTECH INTERNATIONAL LTD (EAF) pays a dividend, with an indicated yield of about 1.60% and 1-year non-decreasing per-share dividend streak (SEC EDGAR XBRL) (market data, as of 2026-08-24). Informational only — not financial advice.

Who are GRAFTECH INTERNATIONAL LTD's (EAF) competitors?

Notable peers of GRAFTECH INTERNATIONAL LTD (EAF) include Showa Denko (now Resonac), Tokai Carbon, Fangda Carbon and HEG Limited. This peer set is informational only — not financial advice.

Is GRAFTECH INTERNATIONAL LTD (EAF) overbought or oversold right now?

GRAFTECH INTERNATIONAL LTD (EAF) is currently neither overbought nor oversold — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 40, in the neutral middle (as of 2026-08-24). RSI describes recent price momentum, not a forecast — informational only, not financial advice.

Where does stocks-llm's data on EAF come from?

Fundamentals and prices come from market data, as of 2026-08-24; company filings and profile facts come from SEC EDGAR. All figures are delayed daily-close data shown with their as-of date — informational only, not financial advice.

Fundamentals: market data, as of 2026-08-24. Filings: SEC EDGAR. Prices are delayed daily-close data.

Last updated 2026-08-24.

Informational only — NOT financial advice. All figures are delayed daily-close data from SEC EDGAR & market data, shown with their as-of date.

Research stocks in your own words.

Informational only — NOT financial advice.

ScreenersBlogPrivacyiOS app