PG&E Corporation (PCG)
Utilities · Electric & Gas Utilities · NYSE
A major California-based regulated utility providing electricity and natural gas, currently focused on massive wildfire mitigation infrastructure investments.
What PG&E Corporation does
PG&E Corporation is a holding company that operates primarily through its subsidiary, Pacific Gas and Electric Company, a regulated utility serving customers in Northern and Central California. The company provides integrated electricity and natural gas services to millions of residential and business customers. Its operations include the transmission, distribution, and procurement of electricity and natural gas.
Themes: utility infrastructure, wildfire risk management, regulated energy markets, grid modernization
Fundamentals
- Price$17.60 as of 2026-08-21 close
- Market cap$47.2B as of 2026-08-21
- 1-year return+20.0% 2025-08-21 close $14.67 → 2026-08-21 close $17.60
- P/E12.35 as of 2026-08-24
- Net margin+12.3% as of 2026-08-24
- Gross margin+35.9% as of 2026-08-24
- ROE+9.6% as of 2026-08-24
- Debt / equity1.89 as of 2026-08-24
- Revenue growth (YoY)+5.7% as of 2026-08-24
- Revenue CAGR (3y)+4.8% SEC XBRL
- Beta0.32 as of 2026-08-24
- Last reported earnings2026-07-23 SEC EDGAR Form 8-K (Item 2.02)
Dividend: yield +1.1%; at least 1 years of non-decreasing per-share dividends (SEC XBRL) — we do not hold the year before it, so the real streak may be longer.
How PCG compares in its sector
- price-to-earnings ratiobottom 10% 67 covered Utilities peers, as of 2026-08-24
- net profit marginmiddle range 71 covered Utilities peers, as of 2026-08-24
- operating marginmiddle range 71 covered Utilities peers, as of 2026-08-24
- gross marginmiddle range 53 covered Utilities peers, as of 2026-08-24
- return on equitymiddle range 72 covered Utilities peers, as of 2026-08-24
- 3-year revenue CAGRmiddle range 70 covered Utilities peers
- indicated dividend yieldbottom 10% 67 covered Utilities peers, as of 2026-08-24
- free cash flow (absolute dollars, latest fiscal year)bottom 10% 57 covered Utilities peers, as of FY2025
Position among covered Utilities companies that report each metric (minimum 5 peers). A relative position within our covered catalog — not a valuation, quality, or investment judgment. A higher percentile is simply a higher value (for P/E, more expensive on earnings — never "better"). Informational only.
Top 10 scores & list membership
PCG is in the Utilities Short-term Top 10.
Utilities Short-term Top 10 — since 18 Aug 2026
Long-term score
48.1 #575 of 987 scored · #21 of 55 in Utilities
Valuation 86th (price to earnings 12.6, price to book 1.4) and long-term trend 65th (a strong uptrend, with buyers in control); weakest is capital return (11th, consecutive years of dividend increases 1 year).
Short-term score
66.1 #33 of 1,704 scored · #1 of 59 in Utilities
Volume and participation 83rd: trading volume is about normal versus its 30-day average; setup 72nd: no Elliott-wave labelling currently fits its swings; weakest is catalysts 57th: analysts' average price target is unchanged from the prior reading.
In this list since 18 Aug 2026 — currently 1st in the list (3 days)
- Entered 18 Aug 2026: first selection for this list at rank 4, score 54.9.
Scores as of 21 Aug 2026. Each bar is a percentile: how this company ranked against every company the score ranked, 0–100. A list is a published formula and its output, not a recommendation. Method version 2.
Dividend coverage
Not assessed — last reported dividend predates the accounts. The most recent fiscal year in which PCG reported a dividend payment is FY2024, while its reported financial statements run through FY2025. Coverage is therefore not assessed for the latest year — an FY2024 ratio would not describe PCG today.
Coverage is derived from reported SEC EDGAR XBRL figures, comparing dividends paid against net income and free cash flow for the SAME fiscal year. It is not shown here because the latest fiscal year with a reported dividend payment (FY2024) is older than the latest year of reported financial statements (FY2025), so any ratio would describe an out-of-date year. Informational only — not financial advice.
How PG&E Corporation looks technically
PG&E Corporation (PCG) is trading 4.8% above its 200-day average, the long-term trend line — a longer-term uptrend. Its 50-day average crossed above its 200-day average about 193 trading days ago — a "golden cross", a bullish long-term signal. A strong uptrend is in place — ADX, a 0–100 trend-strength gauge, is 26, with buyers in control. Momentum is neutral — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 52, neither overbought (above 70) nor oversold (below 30). MACD, a trend-momentum gauge, turned bullish about 4 trading days ago (its momentum flipped positive). It made a new 20-day high about 2 trading days ago.
Trend
8
| Distance from the 200-day | it is trading 4.8% above its 200-day average, the long-term trend line — a longer-term uptrend | +4.8% |
|---|---|---|
| 50-day moving average | its average price over the last 50 trading days — a short-term trend line — is $17.28 | $17.28 |
| 200-day moving average | its average price over the last 200 trading days — the long-term trend line — is $16.79 | $16.79 |
| Swing structure | each recent peak has been higher than the one before it and each dip has been shallower — the pattern chart-watchers call an uptrend, which describes where price has already been and not where it goes next | higher highs and higher lows |
| Last swing turn | its last significant turn was a swing low 14 calendar days ago — the swings before that are what the structure reading is measured on | 14 sessions |
| Wave structure | its recent swings can be read as a five-part upward sequence — what Elliott-wave chartists call an impulse — now in leg 3 of five; the labelling fails if price closes below 16.88. It is one of several labellings that fit, and it describes the swings already printed, not what comes next. The same swings also read as a three-part correction in leg C. | possible upward five-wave sequence, in wave 3 (one of several readings) |
| Since the 50/200 cross | its 50-day average crossed above its 200-day average about 193 trading days ago — a "golden cross", a bullish long-term signal | 193 sessions |
| Trend strength (14-day ADX) | a strong uptrend is in place — ADX, a 0–100 trend-strength gauge, is 26, with buyers in control | 26.0 |
Momentum
3
| 14-day RSI | momentum is neutral — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 52, neither overbought (above 70) nor oversold (below 30) | 51.9 |
|---|---|---|
| Position in its 14-day range | it is trading around the middle of its 14-day range ($16.88 to $18.41) — its "stochastic" reading is 47 out of 100, where 0 would mean closing exactly at the 14-session low and 100 exactly at the high. This measures WHERE the price sits inside its recent range, which is a different question from the RSI beside it: RSI is a momentum gauge, measuring how FAST the price has been moving, so a stock can drift quietly to the bottom of its range with an ordinary RSI, or fall sharply and still sit in the middle. It has been slipping within that range over the last few sessions. | 47.2 |
| Since the MACD crossed zero | MACD, a trend-momentum gauge, turned bullish about 4 trading days ago (its momentum flipped positive) | 4 sessions |
Range
12
| 52-week high | its highest closing price over the past year (about 252 trading days) was $19.15 | $19.15 |
|---|---|---|
| From the 52-week high | it is 8.1% below its 52-week high (its highest price of the past year) | -8.1% |
| Above the 52-week low | it is 23.1% above its 52-week low (its lowest price of the past year) | +23.1% |
| Below the 52-week high | it is 8.1% below its highest point of the past year | 8.1% |
| Since a 20-day breakout | it made a new 20-day high about 2 trading days ago | 2 sessions |
| Since a 55-day breakout | it made a new 55-day high about 23 trading days ago | 23 sessions |
| All-time high | its highest closing price on record is $71.57 (set on 2017-09-11) | $71.57 |
| Given back of the 52-week move | over the past year its closes ranged ($14.44 to $19.11), and it has given back roughly a third of its rise from last year’s low — 32% of it. Chart-watchers call 61.8%-65% given back the "golden pocket" — for this company that is $16.07 to $16.22. It is watched widely enough that orders cluster there, which is the honest reason it matters; it is not a forecast. | 32.3% |
| From the all-time high | it is 75.4% below its all-time high | -75.4% |
| Nearest price level | it is trading 0.7% above a support level at $17.48 — a price it turned at three times since 2025-04-02, most recently on 2026-06-29. Since 2024-08-21 it has 9 such levels below the current price and 5 above. Levels like these describe where the price has reversed or paused before; they are not a forecast of where it will go. | -0.7% |
| All-time low | its lowest closing price on record is $3.55 (set on 2019-10-28) | $3.55 |
| Above the all-time low | it is 395.8% above its all-time low | +395.8% |
Volatility
5
| Band width vs its own 6 months | day-to-day price swings are narrower than usual versus its own recent 6-month history (tighter than about 88% of it) | 12th percentile |
|---|---|---|
| Typical daily range | in a typical session it travels about $0.5084 between its high and its low — about 2.9% of its price. That is its "average true range" over the last 14 sessions, which also counts the distance from the previous close, so a day that opens well away from yesterday counts as the large move it was | $0.5084 |
| Bollinger bands (20-day, ±2σ) | most of its recent trading has stayed between about $17.01 and $18.03 — the "Bollinger bands", a range drawn two standard deviations either side of its 20-day average price, which widens when the stock gets more volatile and narrows when it settles | $17.01 – $17.52 – $18.03 |
| Typical daily range (% of price) | its price moves about 2.9% in a typical session — calmer than most companies we cover. This is the average gap between a session's high and low over the last 14 sessions, counting overnight moves, expressed against the current price so it can be compared with companies trading at any price | 2.9% |
| Stretch from the 200-day average | it is trading 1.6 daily ranges above its 200-day average price (4.8% above it in plain percentage terms) — a way of asking how far it has stretched from its own average in units of how far it normally moves in a day, so a calm company and a jumpy one can be compared on the same scale | 1.6 daily ranges above its 200-day average |
Volume
1
| Volume vs its 30-day average | trading volume is about normal versus its 30-day average | 1.17× |
|---|
Analyst
2
| Change in the average price target | analysts have cut their average price target by 0.3% since the prior reading | -0.3% |
|---|---|---|
| Change in the consensus rating | the analyst consensus rating is unchanged since the prior reading | unchanged |
Candlestick patterns
3
| Since a doji | 6 sessions ago it opened and closed at almost the same price after trading through a wider range — a "doji", the classic picture of buyers and sellers finishing the session level | 6 sessions ago |
|---|---|---|
| Since a bullish engulfing | 1 session ago it opened below the previous session's close and finished above that session's open — a "bullish engulfing" pair, where one up day more than undid the down day before it | 1 session ago |
| Since a bearish engulfing | today it opened above the previous session's close and finished below that session's open — a "bearish engulfing" pair, where one down day more than undid the up day before it | today |
Price gaps
2
| Gap at the open | it opened on 2026-08-21 0.6% above the previous session's close — an overnight gap, the part of the move that happened while the market was shut, and traded back through that level before the close | +0.6% |
|---|---|---|
| Gap filled | a 2.0% gap down opened on 2026-06-16 has been "filled" 46 sessions ago — price traded back through the level the gap left behind, and it closed again during the very session that opened it | 46 sessions ago |
Price streaks
1
| Closing streak | it closed lower in its latest session, after a session that did not close lower — a single down day rather than a run | 1 session down |
|---|
Relative strength
4
| vs market, 1 month | over the past 1 month this stock lagged the market by 1.7 percentage points (the stock gained 0.6% while the market gained 2.3%) | -1.7% |
|---|---|---|
| vs market, 3 months | over the past 3 months this stock beat the market by 4.0 percentage points (the stock gained 7.1% while the market gained 3.1%) | +4.0% |
| vs market, 6 months | over the past 6 months this stock lagged the market by 15.2 percentage points (the stock lost 4.1% while the market gained 11.1%) | -15.2% |
| vs market, 12 months | over the past 12 months this stock lagged the market by 0.5 percentage points (the stock gained 20.0% while the market gained 20.5%) | -0.5% |
Signal agreement
2
| Bullish technical signals | 6 of the 9 technical signals we can compute for it are currently in a bullish state: a strong uptrend, with buyers in control, a "golden cross" — its 50-day average is above its 200-day, trading above its 200-day average, a fresh 20-day high, MACD momentum is positive, trading above the Ichimoku cloud — these describe past price behaviour, not a forecast | 6 of 9 |
|---|---|---|
| Bearish technical signals | 1 of the 9 technical signals we can compute for it is currently in a bearish state: lagging the market over 6 months — these describe past price behaviour, not a forecast | 1 of 9 |
Trend (Ichimoku cloud)
1
| Vs the Ichimoku cloud | trading 2.4% above the Ichimoku cloud — a band drawn from where its own highs and lows sat up to 2026-07-16 and projected forward over today's price, the side traders read as an established uptrend, with the band below acting as the level that would have to give way. The band itself is moderate, spanning 3.6% of the share price. | +2.4% |
|---|
Volume-weighted price
2
| Vs this year’s average price paid | the price is 3% above the average price paid so far this year, so the typical buyer over that stretch is showing a gain. That average is $17.07 — a volume-weighted average of daily closes over 157 sessions, not a true tick-by-tick VWAP. | +3.1% |
|---|---|---|
| Vs the average paid since it last reported | the price is sitting right on the average price paid since it last reported on 2026-07-23 (its 10-Q), so the typical buyer over that stretch is roughly break-even. That average is $17.56 — a volume-weighted average of daily closes over 22 sessions, not a true tick-by-tick VWAP. | +0.3% |
Price levels it has turned at before
PCG last closed at $17.60 on 2026-08-21. Since 2024-08-21 it has turned at 9 prices below its last close and 5 above; the 3 nearest below and the 3 nearest above are listed, nearest first.
| Level | Side | Distance | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| $17.48 | Support | 0.7% below the last close | turned there three times · 2025-04-02 to 2026-06-29 |
| $17.88 | Resistance | 1.6% above the last close | turned there three times · 2025-04-24 to 2026-03-09 |
| $17.16 | Support | 2.5% below the last close | turned there twice · 2025-10-21 to 2026-06-05 |
| $16.79 | Support | 4.6% below the last close | turned there 8 times · 2025-03-03 to 2026-08-07 |
| $18.84 | Resistance | 7.0% above the last close | turned there twice · 2026-03-17 to 2026-04-09 |
| $19.26 | Resistance | 9.4% above the last close | turned there five times · 2024-09-10 to 2026-03-02 |
A level is a price this company reversed or paused at more than once — they describe past behaviour, not a forecast of where the price will go.
Wave structure
Its recent swings can be read as a five-part upward sequence — what Elliott-wave chartists call an impulse — now in leg 3 of five.
This labelling fails — stops being a possible reading at all — if it closes below $16.88.
This is one of several labellings that fit the same swings, so treat it as a reading rather than the reading. It was chosen from 2 labellings that survived the rules, counting shorter readings of the same bars.
On past moves of this shape the leg has usually ended somewhere between $18.79 and $19.96 — that is where it has tended to end if the count holds, not a forecast of where the price goes.
Alternate reading: The same swings also read as a three-part correction in leg C, which fails on a close below $16.88.
This reading has stood for 6 trading days, since 2026-08-14.
Read from daily closes as of 2026-08-21.
An Elliott-wave count describes the swings already printed and the level that would disprove it. It is not a forecast, a target, or advice.
Screens: Trading above the 200-day moving average · Broke out to a new 20-day high · MACD just crossed bullish (12/26/9) · in a strong, established uptrend (ADX) · lagging the market · Printed a bearish engulfing pair | Learn: moving average · golden cross · adx · rsi · macd · breakout
Based on daily closing prices as of 2026-08-21. Describes past price behavior only — informational, not financial advice.
Analyst consensus
- Consensus ratingBuy (1.53 mean, 1=Strong Buy…5=Strong Sell) — 16 analysts
- Mean price target$22.72 range $19.00 – $28.00; median $22.00
Analyst estimates, as of 2026-08-23. These are third-party analyst opinions and price targets, aggregated — not a recommendation, prediction, or advice from stocks-llm. Informational only.
Analyst EPS estimate for PCG
- Consensus EPS estimate$0.4205 next reporting period, as of 2026-08-23
Change over time is not available yet: it needs two readings of the same reporting period at least 30 days apart, and we have been recording these estimates since 2026-08-04. An estimate for a DIFFERENT quarter is not a revision, so a reading from before the last report is never compared with one after it.
The consensus estimate for the next reporting period, and how it has moved between readings of that SAME period. A change is measured only between readings estimating one period — when a company reports, the consensus moves to the next quarter and the two numbers are not comparable. Informational only, not a forecast and not advice.
Key risks (from latest filing)
["Significant financial liabilities and regulatory risks associated with wildfire ignition and mitigation.","Uncertainty regarding the ability to recover wildfire-related costs through regulated rate-making processes.","Exposure to climate change, severe weather events, and infrastructure integrity challenges."]
What changed in the latest 10-Q
AI-assisted comparison of PCG's 10-Q filed 2026-04-23 against the prior one filed 2025-10-23.
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
- Added:
- Newer filing references 2025 Form 10-K instead of 2024 Form 10-K in Overview section
- Newer filing specifies comparison period as three months ended March 31, 2025 vs. March 31, 2024, and references April 2025 SEC filing
- Newer filing adds 'situational awareness tools' and 'ignition response' as separate wildfire mitigation initiatives
- Newer filing states wildfire mitigation initiatives 'reduce but do not eliminate' wildfire risk (vs. older 'reduce' only)
- Newer filing removes reference to workforce retention/contracting challenges for wildfire mitigation
- Newer filing removes detailed description of legal/regulatory requirements and noncompliance review process
- Newer filing adds specific liability estimates for three fires: $1.325 billion (Kincade), $2.15 billion (Dixie), $400 million (Mosquito) as of March 31, 2026
- Newer filing specifies recorded Wildfire Fund receivable of $1.150 billion for Dixie fire with $892 million received as of March 31, 2026
- Newer filing adds discussion of Continuation Account re-evaluation criteria and uncertainties
- Newer filing references SCE's Eaton fire liability and $1.1 billion losses with $134 million Wildfire Fund receivable
- Newer filing specifies accelerated amortization amount of $27 million recognized for Wildfire Fund
- Removed:
- Older filing mentions weather 'conditions' where newer uses 'weather' alone
- Older filing references 'criminal, civil and regulatory penalties or charges' vs. newer 'criminal, civil and regulatory charges'
- Older filing mentions 'changes in interest expense' vs. newer 'increases in interest expense'
- Older filing specifically mentions undergrounding as example of system hardening
- Older filing references workforce execution challenges
- Older filing includes paragraph on CPUC/OEIS reporting for noncompliance instances
- Older filing specifies liability amounts as of September 30, 2025 (pre-filing date reference)
- Older filing lists separate insurance receivables: $523 million (Dixie) and $256 million (Mosquito)
- Older filing references AB 1054 and SB 254 impacts explicitly
- Older filing notes Edison International/SCE Eaton fire without loss amounts
- Reworded:
- Climate change risk description: older filing says 'may be attributable to, and exacerbated by' vs. newer 'is exacerbated by'
- Wildfire damage determination: older says 'primarily determined by environmental conditions (including weather and vegetation conditions)' vs. newer 'primarily by environmental and vegetation conditions'
- Liability characterization: older specifies 'lower end of range' for most fires and 'best estimate' for Kincade; newer states aggregate estimates without qualification
- Wildfire Fund asset treatment: older states intent to 'reduce 20-year life and assess for accelerated amortization'; newer states will 're-evaluate reasonableness of 20-year life and recognize accelerated amortization'
- Recovery mechanism language: older references 'impacts of AB 1054 and SB 254 on...are subject to'; newer focuses on prudency standard interpretation
- Notes:
- Newer filing text appears truncated at end of prudency standard discussion
- Older filing text also appears truncated at end
- Older filing date (2025-10-23) is after newer filing date (2026-04-23), creating temporal inconsistency in 'older' label; this appears to be a data sequencing issue
- Comparison involves different reporting periods (Q1 2026 vs. Q3 2025) which may explain some substantive changes beyond typical MD&A updates
Risk Factors
- Reworded:
- Reference updated from '2024 Form 10-K' (filed 2025-10-23) to '2025 Form 10-K' (filed 2026-04-23)
- Page number changed from 11 to 9 between the two filings
- Notes:
- The Risk Factors section in both filings is minimal and primarily directs readers to the annual Form 10-K filing
- The page number difference may reflect formatting changes rather than substantive content changes
AI-assisted comparison of two SEC filing sections. It describes wording and theme changes only, makes no materiality, legal, or investment judgement, and is not financial advice. Informational only — not financial advice.
Insider activity (SEC Form 4)
0 open-market purchases and 4 open-market sales by insiders in the last 90 days.
- Last 90 days0 buys · 4 sells ($3M) — 3 selling insiders
- Last 180 days0 buys · 6 sells ($5M) — 5 selling insiders
Activity heuristic: net selling (a transparent product heuristic from the counts above, not a prediction or advice)
Most recent open-market transaction: 2026-07-22. As of 2026-08-24.
View full insider trading history → View SEC Form 3/4/5 filingsAsk about PCG's insider activity →
Only open-market purchases (SEC code P) and sales (code S) are counted here. Option exercises, vesting/awards, gifts, and shares withheld for taxes are excluded — they are compensation or mechanical, not open-market conviction. Sales may be planned and non-discretionary (e.g. a Rule 10b5-1 plan) and are not necessarily bearish; open-market buying is not a recommendation to buy. Informational only — not financial advice.
Congressional trading disclosures
U.S. House members publicly disclose their own, their spouse's, and dependent children's stock transactions under the STOCK Act. We hold 4 matched disclosures for PCG from U.S. House Clerk Periodic Transaction Report filings.
Congressional trading disclosures →Institutional ownership (13F)
5 institutional 13F filers reported holding PCG as of 2026-03-31 (quarter-end position, filed within 45 days).
- Distinct 13F filers 5
- Reported shares held 453,762,666
- Reported value $7,978,800,240
reported quarterly holdings change (2025-12-31 → 2026-03-31): 1 new, 2 increased, 2 decreased, 0 exited. Change counts cover only managers that filed 13F reports in BOTH quarters, derived between two quarter-end snapshots — not same-day trades; a single manager is never said to have "bought" or "sold".
Institutional holdings are quarter-end long positions reported on SEC Form 13F-HR, filed up to 45 days after the quarter ends — they are delayed, are not real-time trades, exclude short positions and most non-US securities, and are not investment advice. Any increase/decrease is a reported change between two quarterly snapshots, not a same-day purchase or sale. These are quarter-end snapshots from the 13F filings on SEC EDGAR, filed within 45 days — not real-time, and any change is a difference between two quarterly reports, not a same-day trade. Informational only — not financial advice.
Short interest (FINRA)
PCG had 33,124,054 shares of reported short interest as of the 2026-07-31 FINRA settlement date (delayed, bi-monthly; not real-time).
PCG had 1.24% of its shares outstanding sold short as of the 2026-07-31 FINRA settlement date (percent of FLOAT would be higher — float is not disclosed in the source). FINRA reported 1.42 days to cover at the same settlement.
- Reported short interest (shares) 33,124,054
- Short interest (% of shares outstanding) 1.24%
- Prior settlement (shares) 38,533,995
- Reported change -14.04%
- Days to cover (reported) 1.42
Reported to FINRA as of the 2026-07-31 settlement date. Short interest is reported to FINRA and published on a delayed, bi-monthly schedule (as of a settlement date, disseminated roughly eight business days later) — it is NOT real-time, does not cover every venue or all US trading, and is not a short-squeeze prediction or investment advice. Days-to-cover is the value FINRA reports; percent of float is not shown because the source file carries no share-count denominator — where a percent appears it is of shares OUTSTANDING, the larger base, and is therefore a floor on percent of float. Informational only — not financial advice.
Competitors & peers
- Edison International (EIX)
- Sempra (SRE)
- American Electric Power (AEP)
- Duke Energy (DUK)
- NextEra Energy (NEE)
AI-enriched competitor set. Linked names are companies covered by stocks-llm; other named peers are shown for reference only.
Compare PCG vs…
PG&E Corporation is found in…
Frequently asked questions
What does PG&E Corporation (PCG) do?
PG&E Corporation is a holding company that operates primarily through its subsidiary, Pacific Gas and Electric Company, a regulated utility serving customers in Northern and Central California. The company provides integrated electricity and natural gas services to millions of residential and business customers. Its operations include the transmission, distribution, and procurement of electricity and natural gas.
What sector is PG&E Corporation (PCG) in?
PG&E Corporation (PCG) is classified in the Utilities sector. Its industry is Electric & Gas Utilities. It trades on NYSE.
Does PCG pay a dividend?
Yes — PG&E Corporation (PCG) pays a dividend, with an indicated yield of about 1.09% and at least 1 years of non-decreasing per-share dividends (SEC EDGAR XBRL) — we do not hold the year before it, so the real streak may be longer (market data, as of 2026-08-24). Informational only — not financial advice.
Who are PG&E Corporation's (PCG) competitors?
Notable peers of PG&E Corporation (PCG) include Edison International, Sempra, American Electric Power, Duke Energy and NextEra Energy. This peer set is informational only — not financial advice.
Has there been recent Congressional stock trading in PCG?
Yes — we hold 4 matched STOCK Act disclosures for PCG from U.S. House Clerk Periodic Transaction Report filings. These are legally-required disclosures (often filed 30–45 days after the trade), may belong to a U.S. House member, their spouse, or a dependent child, and are not an indicator of company performance or investment advice.
Is PG&E Corporation (PCG) overbought or oversold right now?
PG&E Corporation (PCG) is currently neither overbought nor oversold — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 52, in the neutral middle (as of 2026-08-21). RSI describes recent price momentum, not a forecast — informational only, not financial advice.
Where does stocks-llm's data on PCG come from?
Fundamentals and prices come from market data, as of 2026-08-24; company filings and profile facts come from SEC EDGAR. All figures are delayed daily-close data shown with their as-of date — informational only, not financial advice.
Fundamentals: market data, as of 2026-08-24. Filings: SEC EDGAR. Prices are delayed daily-close data.
Last updated 2026-08-21.
Informational only — NOT financial advice. All figures are delayed daily-close data from SEC EDGAR & market data, shown with their as-of date.