Park Hotels & Resorts (PK)
Real Estate · Lodging REITs · NYSE
Park Hotels & Resorts is a lodging-focused REIT owning a portfolio of upper-upscale and luxury hotels and resorts across the United States.
What Park Hotels & Resorts does
Park Hotels & Resorts is a real estate investment trust (REIT) that owns a diverse portfolio of primarily upper-upscale and luxury hotels and resorts. The company's properties are managed and operated by third-party hotel management companies under various brand names. Its operations focus on generating revenue from rooms, food and beverage, and ancillary hotel services.
Themes: lodging / hospitality, real estate investment trust (REIT), upper-upscale and luxury travel
Fundamentals
- Price$15.78 as of 2026-08-21 close
- Market cap$3.2B as of 2026-08-21
- 1-year return+41.3% 2025-08-21 close $11.17 → 2026-08-21 close $15.78
- P/En/a negative earnings
- Net margin-6.4% as of 2026-08-24
- Gross margin+65.1% as of 2026-08-24
- ROE-5.1% as of 2026-08-24
- Debt / equity1.27 as of 2026-08-24
- Revenue growth (YoY)-1.4% as of 2026-08-24
- Revenue CAGR (3y)+0.5% SEC XBRL
- Beta1.40 as of 2026-08-24
- Last reported earnings2026-08-06 SEC EDGAR Form 8-K (Item 2.02)
Dividend: yield +4.1%; 1-year non-decreasing per-share dividend streak (SEC XBRL).
How PK compares in its sector
- net profit marginbottom 25% 161 covered Real Estate peers, as of 2026-08-24
- operating marginbottom 25% 161 covered Real Estate peers, as of 2026-08-24
- gross marginmiddle range 156 covered Real Estate peers, as of 2026-08-24
- return on equitybottom 25% 162 covered Real Estate peers, as of 2026-08-24
- 3-year revenue CAGRbottom 25% 155 covered Real Estate peers
- indicated dividend yieldmiddle range 138 covered Real Estate peers, as of 2026-08-24
- free cash flow (absolute dollars, latest fiscal year)middle range 42 covered Real Estate peers, as of FY2025
Position among covered Real Estate companies that report each metric (minimum 5 peers). A relative position within our covered catalog — not a valuation, quality, or investment judgment. A higher percentile is simply a higher value (for P/E, more expensive on earnings — never "better"). Informational only.
Top 10 scores & list membership
PK is in the Real Estate Short-term Top 10.
Real Estate Short-term Top 10 — since 18 Aug 2026
Long-term score
38.6 #848 of 987 scored · #74 of 84 in Real Estate
Valuation 93rd (price to book 1) and long-term trend 77th (it is 1.2% below its highest point of the past year); weakest is profitability (7th, return on equity -5.1%, operating margin 2%).
Short-term score
58.0 #322 of 1,704 scored · #8 of 94 in Real Estate
Trend 67th: the price is 5% above the average price paid over the period covered, so the typical buyer over that stretch is showing a gain; momentum 63rd: over the past 3 months this stock beat the market by 34.6 percentage points; weakest is setup 48th: over the past year its closes ranged, and it has retraced essentially none of its move over the past year — 1% of it.
In this list since 18 Aug 2026 — currently 6th in the list (3 days)
- Entered 18 Aug 2026: first selection for this list at rank 9, score 55.9.
Scores as of 21 Aug 2026. Each bar is a percentile: how this company ranked against every company the score ranked, 0–100. A list is a published formula and its output, not a recommendation. Method version 2.
Dividend coverage (FY2025)
Exceeded at least one reported measure. In FY2025, PK's dividend exceeded at least one reported measure of what it earned or generated (free-cash-flow payout 275%). A payout above 100% in one year is not necessarily unsustainable, but it is not fully covered by that measure.
- Earnings payoutnot assessable earnings were not positive that year
- Free-cash-flow payout275% dividends / (operating cash flow − capex)
Coverage derived from reported SEC EDGAR XBRL figures for FY2025 (dividends paid vs. net income and free cash flow, same fiscal year). This describes PAST coverage for one fiscal year — it does not predict whether a dividend will be maintained, raised, or cut, and a one-year payout ratio can be distorted by non-recurring items. Informational only — not financial advice.
How Park Hotels & Resorts looks technically
Park Hotels & Resorts (PK) is trading 31.9% above its 200-day average, the long-term trend line — a longer-term uptrend. Its 50-day average crossed above its 200-day average about 56 trading days ago — a "golden cross", a bullish long-term signal. There is no clear trend right now — the price is choppy (ADX, a 0–100 trend-strength gauge, is 17, below the 25 that marks a real trend), though buyers have been pushing harder than sellers lately — pressure, not a trend. Momentum is neutral — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 65, neither overbought (above 70) nor oversold (below 30). MACD, a trend-momentum gauge, turned bullish about 4 trading days ago (its momentum flipped positive). It made a new 20-day high about 3 trading days ago. It is 1.2% below its 52-week high (its highest price of the past year).
Trend
8
| Distance from the 200-day | it is trading 31.9% above its 200-day average, the long-term trend line — a longer-term uptrend | +31.9% |
|---|---|---|
| 50-day moving average | its average price over the last 50 trading days — a short-term trend line — is $14.72 | $14.72 |
| 200-day moving average | its average price over the last 200 trading days — the long-term trend line — is $11.96 | $11.96 |
| Swing structure | each recent peak has been higher than the one before it and each dip has been shallower — the pattern chart-watchers call an uptrend, which describes where price has already been and not where it goes next | higher highs and higher lows |
| Last swing turn | its last significant turn was a swing low 11 calendar days ago — the swings before that are what the structure reading is measured on | 11 sessions |
| Wave structure | its recent swings can be read as a five-part upward sequence — what Elliott-wave chartists call an impulse — now in leg 3 of five; the labelling fails if price closes below 14.28. It is one of several labellings that fit, and it describes the swings already printed, not what comes next. The same swings also read as a three-part correction in leg C. | possible upward five-wave sequence, in wave 3 (one of several readings) |
| Since the 50/200 cross | its 50-day average crossed above its 200-day average about 56 trading days ago — a "golden cross", a bullish long-term signal | 56 sessions |
| Trend strength (14-day ADX) | there is no clear trend right now — the price is choppy (ADX, a 0–100 trend-strength gauge, is 17, below the 25 that marks a real trend), though buyers have been pushing harder than sellers lately — pressure, not a trend | 16.8 |
Momentum
3
| 14-day RSI | momentum is neutral — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 65, neither overbought (above 70) nor oversold (below 30) | 65.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Position in its 14-day range | it is trading near the top of its 14-day range ($14.28 to $15.96) — its "stochastic" reading is 89 out of 100, where 0 would mean closing exactly at the 14-session low and 100 exactly at the high. This measures WHERE the price sits inside its recent range, which is a different question from the RSI beside it: RSI is a momentum gauge, measuring how FAST the price has been moving, so a stock can drift quietly to the bottom of its range with an ordinary RSI, or fall sharply and still sit in the middle. It has been slipping within that range over the last few sessions. | 89.0 |
| Since the MACD crossed zero | MACD, a trend-momentum gauge, turned bullish about 4 trading days ago (its momentum flipped positive) | 4 sessions |
Range
12
| 52-week high | its highest closing price over the past year (about 252 trading days) was $15.96 | $15.96 |
|---|---|---|
| From the 52-week high | it is 1.2% below its 52-week high (its highest price of the past year) | -1.2% |
| Above the 52-week low | it is 60.4% above its 52-week low (its lowest price of the past year) | +60.4% |
| Below the 52-week high | it is 1.2% below its highest point of the past year | 1.2% |
| Since a 20-day breakout | it made a new 20-day high about 3 trading days ago | 3 sessions |
| Since a 55-day breakout | it made a new 55-day high about 3 trading days ago | 3 sessions |
| All-time high | its highest closing price on record is $34.27 (set on 2018-09-07) | $34.27 |
| Given back of the 52-week move | over the past year its closes ranged ($9.84 to $15.83), and it has given back essentially none of its rise from last year’s low — 1% of it. Chart-watchers call 61.8%-65% given back the "golden pocket" — for this company that is $11.94 to $12.13. It is watched widely enough that orders cluster there, which is the honest reason it matters; it is not a forecast. | 0.8% |
| From the all-time high | it is 54.0% below its all-time high | -54.0% |
| Nearest price level | it is trading 2.4% above a support level at $15.40 — a price it turned at four times since 2024-08-30, most recently on 2026-07-30. Since 2024-08-21 it has 13 such levels below the current price and 0 above. Levels like these describe where the price has reversed or paused before; they are not a forecast of where it will go. | -2.4% |
| All-time low | its lowest closing price on record is $3.99 (set on 2020-03-18) | $3.99 |
| Above the all-time low | it is 295.5% above its all-time low | +295.5% |
Volatility
5
| Band width vs its own 6 months | day-to-day price swings are about average versus its own recent 6-month history | 55th percentile |
|---|---|---|
| Typical daily range | in a typical session it travels about $0.4178 between its high and its low — about 2.7% of its price. That is its "average true range" over the last 14 sessions, which also counts the distance from the previous close, so a day that opens well away from yesterday counts as the large move it was | $0.4178 |
| Bollinger bands (20-day, ±2σ) | most of its recent trading has stayed between about $14.26 and $15.89 — the "Bollinger bands", a range drawn two standard deviations either side of its 20-day average price, which widens when the stock gets more volatile and narrows when it settles | $14.26 – $15.07 – $15.89 |
| Typical daily range (% of price) | its price moves about 2.7% in a typical session — calmer than most companies we cover. This is the average gap between a session's high and low over the last 14 sessions, counting overnight moves, expressed against the current price so it can be compared with companies trading at any price | 2.6% |
| Stretch from the 200-day average | it is trading 9.1 daily ranges above its 200-day average price (31.9% above it in plain percentage terms) — a way of asking how far it has stretched from its own average in units of how far it normally moves in a day, so a calm company and a jumpy one can be compared on the same scale | 9.1 daily ranges above its 200-day average |
Volume
1
| Volume vs its 30-day average | trading volume is about normal versus its 30-day average | 0.83× |
|---|
Analyst
2
| Change in the average price target | analysts have raised their average price target by 3.0% since the prior reading | +3.0% |
|---|---|---|
| Change in the consensus rating | the analyst consensus rating is unchanged since the prior reading | unchanged |
Candlestick patterns
2
| Since a bullish engulfing | 3 sessions ago it opened below the previous session's close and finished above that session's open — a "bullish engulfing" pair, where one up day more than undid the down day before it | 3 sessions ago |
|---|---|---|
| Since a bearish engulfing | 8 sessions ago it opened above the previous session's close and finished below that session's open — a "bearish engulfing" pair, where one down day more than undid the up day before it | 8 sessions ago |
Price gaps
3
| Gap at the open | it opened on 2026-08-21 0.7% above the previous session's close — an overnight gap, the part of the move that happened while the market was shut, and traded back through that level before the close | +0.7% |
|---|---|---|
| Open gap | it gapped 3.6% above the previous close 51 sessions ago and has not traded back through the level it left behind at 13.52 — an "unfilled gap", which describes a price range no trade has since crossed and is not a forecast that it will be crossed | +3.6% |
| Gap filled | a 2.0% gap up opened on 2026-08-07 has been "filled" 10 sessions ago — price traded back through the level the gap left behind, and it closed again during the very session that opened it | 10 sessions ago |
Price streaks
1
| Closing streak | it has closed lower 2 sessions in a row, a -0.32% move over the run — an unbroken run of down days, which describes what has already happened and says nothing about the next session | 2 sessions down |
|---|
Relative strength
4
| vs market, 1 month | over the past 1 month this stock beat the market by 2.5 percentage points (the stock gained 4.8% while the market gained 2.3%) | +2.5% |
|---|---|---|
| vs market, 3 months | over the past 3 months this stock beat the market by 34.6 percentage points (the stock gained 37.7% while the market gained 3.1%) | +34.6% |
| vs market, 6 months | over the past 6 months this stock beat the market by 29.2 percentage points (the stock gained 40.3% while the market gained 11.1%) | +29.2% |
| vs market, 12 months | over the past 12 months this stock beat the market by 20.8 percentage points (the stock gained 41.3% while the market gained 20.5%) | +20.8% |
Signal agreement
2
| Bullish technical signals | 6 of the 9 technical signals we can compute for it are currently in a bullish state: a "golden cross" — its 50-day average is above its 200-day, trading above its 200-day average, a fresh 20-day high, MACD momentum is positive, outperforming the market over 6 months, trading above the Ichimoku cloud — these describe past price behaviour, not a forecast | 6 of 9 |
|---|---|---|
| Bearish technical signals | 1 of the 9 technical signals we can compute for it is currently in a bearish state: near the top of its 14-day range (overbought) — these describe past price behaviour, not a forecast | 1 of 9 |
Trend (Ichimoku cloud)
1
| Vs the Ichimoku cloud | trading 10% above the Ichimoku cloud — a band drawn from where its own highs and lows sat up to 2026-07-16 and projected forward over today's price, the side traders read as an established uptrend, with the band below acting as the level that would have to give way. The band itself is thick, spanning 9.4% of the share price, which is taken to mean a barrier that has held for a while and takes effort to cross. | +10.3% |
|---|
Volume-weighted price
2
| Vs this year’s average price paid | the price is 26% above the average price paid so far this year, so the typical buyer over that stretch is showing a gain. That average is $12.56 — a volume-weighted average of daily closes over 157 sessions, not a true tick-by-tick VWAP. | +25.7% |
|---|---|---|
| Vs the average paid since it last reported | the price is 5% above the average price paid since it last reported on 2026-08-06 (its 8-K), so the typical buyer over that stretch is showing a gain. That average is $15.06 — a volume-weighted average of daily closes over 12 sessions, not a true tick-by-tick VWAP. | +4.8% |
Price levels it has turned at before
PK last closed at $15.78 on 2026-08-21. Since 2024-08-21 it has turned at 13 prices below its last close and 0 above; the 3 nearest below are listed, nearest first.
| Level | Side | Distance | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| $15.40 | Support | 2.4% below the last close | turned there four times · 2024-08-30 to 2026-07-30 |
| $14.85 | Support | 5.9% below the last close | turned there three times · 2024-10-15 to 2026-06-29 |
| $14.31 | Support | 9.3% below the last close | turned there twice · 2024-12-18 to 2026-08-10 |
A level is a price this company reversed or paused at more than once — they describe past behaviour, not a forecast of where the price will go.
Wave structure
Its recent swings can be read as a five-part upward sequence — what Elliott-wave chartists call an impulse — now in leg 3 of five.
This labelling fails — stops being a possible reading at all — if it closes below $14.28.
This is one of several labellings that fit the same swings, so treat it as a reading rather than the reading. It was chosen from 2 labellings that survived the rules, counting shorter readings of the same bars.
On past moves of this shape the leg has usually ended somewhere between $16.09 and $17.22 — that is where it has tended to end if the count holds, not a forecast of where the price goes.
Alternate reading: The same swings also read as a three-part correction in leg C, which fails on a close below $14.28.
This reading has stood for 5 trading days, since 2026-08-17.
Read from daily closes as of 2026-08-21.
An Elliott-wave count describes the swings already printed and the level that would disprove it. It is not a forecast, a target, or advice.
Screens: Trading above the 200-day moving average · Near the 52-week high · Broke out to a new 20-day high · MACD just crossed bullish (12/26/9) · trendless / choppy (low ADX) · Analyst price target recently RAISED | Learn: moving average · golden cross · adx · rsi · macd · breakout · fifty two week high low
Based on daily closing prices as of 2026-08-21. Describes past price behavior only — informational, not financial advice.
Analyst consensus
- Consensus ratingHold (2.72 mean, 1=Strong Buy…5=Strong Sell) — 16 analysts
- Mean price target$15.19 range $11.00 – $20.00; median $15.00
Analyst estimates, as of 2026-08-23. These are third-party analyst opinions and price targets, aggregated — not a recommendation, prediction, or advice from stocks-llm. Informational only.
Analyst EPS estimate for PK
- Consensus EPS estimate$0.01 next reporting period, as of 2026-08-23
Change over time is not available yet: it needs two readings of the same reporting period at least 30 days apart, and we have been recording these estimates since 2026-08-04. An estimate for a DIFFERENT quarter is not a revision, so a reading from before the last report is never compared with one after it.
The consensus estimate for the next reporting period, and how it has moved between readings of that SAME period. A change is measured only between readings estimating one period — when a company reports, the consensus moves to the next quarter and the two numbers are not comparable. Informational only, not a forecast and not advice.
Key risks (from latest filing)
["High sensitivity to economic conditions affecting travel and hotel demand","Significant debt levels and associated interest expense volatility","Risks related to third-party hotel management agreements and operational control"]
What changed in the latest 10-Q
AI-assisted comparison of PK's 10-Q filed 2026-05-01 against the prior one filed 2025-11-03.
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
- Added:
- Reference to $700 million delayed draw mortgage loan (Bonnet Creek Mortgage Loan) secured by Bonnet Creek complex properties (added in newer filing)
- Mention of 'government and agency shutdowns' as plural and expanded impact language (newer filing)
- Reference to expected reopening of Royal Palm South Beach Miami in June 2026 (newer filing)
- Reference to World Cup and 250th anniversary of U.S. as upcoming major events in 2026 outlook (newer filing)
- Shift in business strategy explicitly stated: 'to dispose of all Non-Core hotels' (newer filing)
- Reference to 12 remaining Non-Core hotels (11 consolidated and one unconsolidated joint venture) (newer filing)
- Removed:
- Specific references to SF Mortgage Loan ($725 million CMBS loan) and San Francisco hotels (Hilton San Francisco Union Square, Parc 55) removed (older filing context no longer included)
- Reference to court-appointed receiver and November 21, 2025 sale deadline removed (older filing)
- Mention of buyer assuming SF Mortgage Loan at sale removed (older filing)
- Reference to 38 hotels total (older filing stated this; newer shows 33 hotels)
- Reference to 'over 24,000 rooms' (older filing) changed to 'over 22,000 rooms' (newer filing)
- Statement about 'over 87% are luxury and upper upscale' removed; replaced with '96% of rooms in Core portfolio are luxury and upper upscale' (newer filing)
- Language about 'consolidation in the lodging REIT industry' and related economies of scale removed (newer filing)
- Reference to 'two operating segments' changed to 'three operating segments' (newer filing)
- Outlook reference to 'third quarter of 2025' changed to 'first quarter of 2026' (newer filing)
- Outlook reference to 'remainder of 2025' changed to 'for 2026' (newer filing)
- Reference to 'expected improvements in group demand' removed from outlook (older filing); replaced with World Cup and anniversary events (newer filing)
- Reference to Form 10-K for year ended December 31, 2024 changed to December 31, 2025 (newer filing)
- Reworded:
- Portfolio description changed from general high-quality portfolio to explicit division into Core portfolio (20 consolidated hotels, one unconsolidated JV) and Non-Core hotels (newer filing)
- Strategic focus explicitly reframed: older filing did not delineate Core vs. Non-Core strategy; newer filing makes this the centerpiece of business structure
- Macroeconomic risks expanded to include 'geopolitical conflicts or trends' with additional language about 'travel barriers' and 'disapproval of U.S. foreign or domestic policy' (newer filing)
- Forward-looking statement qualifier changed from singular 'government shutdown' (older) to 'government and agency shutdowns' (newer)
- Operating segment structure and reporting changed: older filing describes 'consolidated hotels and unconsolidated hotels'; newer filing describes 'consolidated Core hotels, consolidated Non-Core hotels and unconsolidated hotels' with different reportable segments
- Note reference updated: older filing references 'Note 11: Business Segment Information'; newer filing references 'Note 10: Business Segment Information'
- Notes:
- Text truncation in newer filing ('Key Business Metri' is incomplete) makes full comparison of Key Business Metrics section impossible
- Comparison reflects differences between Q3 2025 filing (older) and Q1 2026 filing (newer), representing different fiscal periods and strategic developments
- Some removals reflect natural progression of events (SF Mortgage Loan disposition) rather than changes in disclosure philosophy
Risk Factors
- Added:
- Newer filing (2026-05-01) shows 'Assets held for sale, net' line item with $0 million as of March 31, 2026
- Newer filing (2026-05-01) Statement of Operations includes 'Loss on sale of assets, net' of $(1) million for three months ended March 31, 2026
- Newer filing (2026-05-01) Statement of Operations shows 'Gain on derecognition of assets' of $0 for three months ended March 31, 2026
- Newer filing (2026-05-01) Cash Flow Statement includes 'Proceeds from asset dispositions, net' of $11 million for three months ended March 31, 2026
- Newer filing (2026-05-01) includes equity statement for three months ended March 31, 2026 showing 'Share-based compensation, net' reducing additional paid-in capital by $8 million
- Removed:
- Older filing (2025-11-03) shows 'Contract asset' of $868 million as of September 30, 2025; absent in newer filing balance sheet as of March 31, 2026
- Older filing (2025-11-03) shows 'Debt associated with hotels in receivership' of $725 million; absent in newer filing
- Older filing (2025-11-03) shows 'Accrued interest associated with hotels in receivership' of $143 million; absent in newer filing
- Older filing (2025-11-03) Statement of Operations includes 'Interest expense associated with hotels in receivership' of $(16) million for three months ended September 30, 2025; newer filing shows $0 for comparable period
- Reworded:
- Newer filing (2026-05-01) Statement of Operations caption changed from 'Net (loss) income' to 'Net income (loss)' for three months ended March 31, 2026 vs. 2025
- Newer filing (2026-05-01) Statement of Operations caption changed from '(Loss) earnings per share' to 'Earnings (loss) per share' for three months ended March 31, 2026 vs. 2025
- Notes:
- The two filings cover different reporting periods (March 31, 2026 vs. September 30, 2025 and December 31, 2024), making some balance sheet changes attributable to the passage of time and business operations rather than accounting policy changes
- The absence of 'Debt associated with hotels in receivership' and related interest expense in the newer filing may reflect resolution or restructuring of those assets, not a presentation change
AI-assisted comparison of two SEC filing sections. It describes wording and theme changes only, makes no materiality, legal, or investment judgement, and is not financial advice. Informational only — not financial advice.
Insider activity (SEC Form 4)
No open-market insider purchases or sales are on record for PK — recent Form 4 activity was compensation-related (awards, option exercises, or tax withholding), not open-market buying or selling.
View full insider trading history → View SEC Form 3/4/5 filingsOnly open-market purchases (SEC code P) and sales (code S) are counted here. Option exercises, vesting/awards, gifts, and shares withheld for taxes are excluded — they are compensation or mechanical, not open-market conviction. Sales may be planned and non-discretionary (e.g. a Rule 10b5-1 plan) and are not necessarily bearish; open-market buying is not a recommendation to buy. Informational only — not financial advice.
Congressional trading disclosures
U.S. House members publicly disclose their own, their spouse's, and dependent children's stock transactions under the STOCK Act. We hold 2 matched disclosures for PK from U.S. House Clerk Periodic Transaction Report filings.
Congressional trading disclosures →Short interest (FINRA)
PK had 33,085,760 shares of reported short interest as of the 2026-07-31 FINRA settlement date (delayed, bi-monthly; not real-time).
PK had 16.4% of its shares outstanding sold short as of the 2026-07-31 FINRA settlement date (percent of FLOAT would be higher — float is not disclosed in the source). FINRA reported 9.1 days to cover at the same settlement.
- Reported short interest (shares) 33,085,760
- Short interest (% of shares outstanding) 16.4%
- Prior settlement (shares) 36,781,265
- Reported change -10.05%
- Days to cover (reported) 9.1
Reported to FINRA as of the 2026-07-31 settlement date. Short interest is reported to FINRA and published on a delayed, bi-monthly schedule (as of a settlement date, disseminated roughly eight business days later) — it is NOT real-time, does not cover every venue or all US trading, and is not a short-squeeze prediction or investment advice. Days-to-cover is the value FINRA reports; percent of float is not shown because the source file carries no share-count denominator — where a percent appears it is of shares OUTSTANDING, the larger base, and is therefore a floor on percent of float. Informational only — not financial advice.
Competitors & peers
- Host Hotels & Resorts (HST)
- DiamondRock Hospitality (DRH)
- Sunstone Hotel Investors (SHO)
- RLJ Lodging Trust (RLJ)
- Pebblebrook Hotel Trust (PEB)
- Apple Hospitality REIT (APLE)
AI-enriched competitor set. Linked names are companies covered by stocks-llm; other named peers are shown for reference only.
Compare PK vs…
Park Hotels & Resorts is found in…
Frequently asked questions
What does Park Hotels & Resorts (PK) do?
Park Hotels & Resorts is a real estate investment trust (REIT) that owns a diverse portfolio of primarily upper-upscale and luxury hotels and resorts. The company's properties are managed and operated by third-party hotel management companies under various brand names. Its operations focus on generating revenue from rooms, food and beverage, and ancillary hotel services.
What sector is Park Hotels & Resorts (PK) in?
Park Hotels & Resorts (PK) is classified in the Real Estate sector. Its industry is Lodging REITs. It trades on NYSE.
Does PK pay a dividend?
Yes — Park Hotels & Resorts (PK) pays a dividend, with an indicated yield of about 4.12% and 1-year non-decreasing per-share dividend streak (SEC EDGAR XBRL) (market data, as of 2026-08-24). Informational only — not financial advice.
Who are Park Hotels & Resorts's (PK) competitors?
Notable peers of Park Hotels & Resorts (PK) include Host Hotels & Resorts, DiamondRock Hospitality, Sunstone Hotel Investors, RLJ Lodging Trust and Pebblebrook Hotel Trust. This peer set is informational only — not financial advice.
Has there been recent Congressional stock trading in PK?
Yes — we hold 2 matched STOCK Act disclosures for PK from U.S. House Clerk Periodic Transaction Report filings. These are legally-required disclosures (often filed 30–45 days after the trade), may belong to a U.S. House member, their spouse, or a dependent child, and are not an indicator of company performance or investment advice.
Is Park Hotels & Resorts (PK) overbought or oversold right now?
Park Hotels & Resorts (PK) is currently neither overbought nor oversold — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 65, in the neutral middle (as of 2026-08-21). RSI describes recent price momentum, not a forecast — informational only, not financial advice.
Where does stocks-llm's data on PK come from?
Fundamentals and prices come from market data, as of 2026-08-24; company filings and profile facts come from SEC EDGAR. All figures are delayed daily-close data shown with their as-of date — informational only, not financial advice.
Fundamentals: market data, as of 2026-08-24. Filings: SEC EDGAR. Prices are delayed daily-close data.
Last updated 2026-08-21.
Informational only — NOT financial advice. All figures are delayed daily-close data from SEC EDGAR & market data, shown with their as-of date.