Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (TUSK)
Energy · Oilfield Services & Equipment · NASDAQ
An integrated energy services provider focused on equipment rentals, drilling, sand proppant, and utility infrastructure, with a growing specialized aviation asset platform.
What Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. does
Mammoth Energy Services is an integrated, growth-oriented company providing specialized equipment, products, and services primarily to the oil and natural gas, aviation, and utility infrastructure industries. Its core operations include equipment rentals (including aviation assets), directional drilling, natural sand proppant sales for hydraulic fracturing, and accommodation services for remote workers, alongside a focused fiber optic infrastructure services division. The company emphasizes asset utilization, capital efficiency, and strategic expansion across these diversified service segments.
Recent developments
Mammoth increased its full-year 2026 outlook for the second time, expecting revenue growth to exceed 90% and an Adjusted EBITDA margin over 10%. In the second quarter of 2026, the company expanded its fiber optic infrastructure footprint by acquiring Mission Construction LLC and BERE Rentals LLC.
From Mammoth Energy Services, Inc.'s filing of 2026-08-07.
Themes: oilfield services, infrastructure services / fiber optics, aviation asset leasing, hydraulic fracturing supply chain, energy transition / utility grid support
Fundamentals
- Price$2.69 as of 2026-10-20 close
- Market cap$129M as of 2026-08-04 (share count; price 2026-10-20)
- 1-year return+21.2% 2025-10-20 close $2.22 → 2026-10-20 close $2.69
- P/E269.00 as of 2026-10-20
- Net margin+10.4% FY2025, SEC XBRL
- ROE+1.8% FY2025, SEC XBRL
- ROICn/a No figure: its pre-tax income was zero or negative, so there is no tax rate to apply.
- Debt / equityn/a No figure: its filing tags none of the debt lines we read, which is not evidence of zero debt.
- Revenue growth (YoY)-2.9% FY2025, SEC XBRL
- Revenue CAGR (3y)-50.4% SEC XBRL
- Beta0.85 as of 2026-09-02
- Last reported earnings2026-08-07 SEC EDGAR Form 8-K (Item 2.02)
Dividend: at least 2 years of non-decreasing per-share dividends (SEC XBRL) — we do not hold the year before it, so the real streak may be longer.
How TUSK compares in its sector
- price-to-earnings ratiotop 10% 100 covered Energy peers, as of 2026-10-20
- net profit marginmiddle range 135 covered Energy peers, as of 2026-09-02
- operating marginbottom 10% 122 covered Energy peers, as of 2026-09-02
- return on equitymiddle range 143 covered Energy peers, as of 2026-09-02
- 3-year revenue CAGRbottom 10% 139 covered Energy peers
- free cash flow (absolute dollars, latest fiscal year)bottom 10% 96 covered Energy peers, as of FY2025
Position among covered Energy companies that report each metric (minimum 5 peers). A relative position within our covered catalog — not a valuation, quality, or investment judgment. A higher percentile is simply a higher value (for P/E, more expensive on earnings — never "better"). Informational only.
Dividend coverage
Not assessed — last reported dividend predates the accounts. The most recent fiscal year in which TUSK reported a dividend payment is FY2019, while its reported financial statements run through FY2025. Coverage is therefore not assessed for the latest year — an FY2019 ratio would not describe TUSK today.
Coverage is derived from reported SEC EDGAR XBRL figures, comparing dividends paid against net income and free cash flow for the SAME fiscal year. It is not shown here because the latest fiscal year with a reported dividend payment (FY2019) is older than the latest year of reported financial statements (FY2025), so any ratio would describe an out-of-date year. Informational only — not financial advice.
Quarterly results
| Quarter | Operating income | Net income | Diluted EPS | Operating cash flow | Capex |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 FY2026 2026-06-30 | $3M | -$760000 | -$0.01 | -$7M† | $44M† |
| Q1 FY2026 2026-03-31 | -$869000 | $5M | $0.11 | -$3M | $12M |
| Q4 FY2025 2025-12-31 | -$12M† | $9M† | $0.19† | -$9M† | $26M† |
| Q3 FY2025 2025-09-30 | -$9M | -$13M | -$0.26 | $730000† | $17M† |
| Q2 FY2025 2025-06-30 | -$37M | $9M | $0.18 | -$13M† | $27M† |
| Q1 FY2025 2025-03-31 | -$1M | -$537000 | -$0.01 | $3M | $462000 |
| Q4 FY2024 2024-12-31 | -$9M† | -$15M† | -$0.32† | $141M† | $149000† |
| Q3 FY2024 2024-09-30 | -$6M | -$24M | -$0.50 | -$1M† | $159000† |
† Not filed as a discrete quarter: derived from the company's own year-to-date figures (for example the fourth quarter as the fiscal year minus the first nine months). A derived per-share figure is approximate, because the share count moves within the year.
Balance sheet at 2026-06-30
- Cash and equivalents$51M
- Short-term investments$26M
- Total debtnot shown the filing tags none of the debt lines we read — not evidence of zero debt
From the company's own SEC 10-Q and 10-K filings (XBRL), re-read every week. Figures in US dollars as filed; informational only — not financial advice.
How Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. looks technically
Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (TUSK) is trading 1.2% below its 200-day average, the long-term trend line — a long-term downtrend. Its 50-day average crossed above its 200-day average about 141 trading days ago — a "golden cross", a bullish long-term signal. A trend is forming but not yet strong — ADX, a 0–100 trend-strength gauge, is 21 (a reading of 25+ marks a strong trend). Momentum is neutral — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 35, neither overbought (above 70) nor oversold (below 30). It just made a new 20-day low, its first since 2026-07-31, breaking below its recent trading range. It is 29.0% below its highest point of the past year.
Trend
8
| Distance from the 200-day | it is trading 1.2% below its 200-day average, the long-term trend line — a long-term downtrend | -1.2% |
|---|---|---|
| 50-day moving average | its average price over the last 50 trading days — a short-term trend line — is $3.02 | $3.02 |
| 200-day moving average | its average price over the last 200 trading days — the long-term trend line — is $2.72 | $2.72 |
| Swing structure | its recent peaks and dips disagree — one of them is rising while the other is not, so there is no clean up or down pattern in the swings | mixed — one of the two is not confirming |
| Last swing turn | its last significant turn was a swing high 47 calendar days ago — the swings before that are what the structure reading is measured on | 47 sessions |
| Wave structure | its recent swings can be read as a completed three-part upward correction — a pullback in the A-B-C shape Elliott-wave chartists use; the labelling fails if price closes above 3.295. It is the only labelling that fits, though not with textbook proportions, and it describes the swings already printed, not what comes next. | possible three-wave upward correction, complete (atypical proportions) |
| Since the 50/200 cross | its 50-day average crossed above its 200-day average about 141 trading days ago — a "golden cross", a bullish long-term signal | 141 sessions |
| Trend strength (14-day ADX) | a trend is forming but not yet strong — ADX, a 0–100 trend-strength gauge, is 21 (a reading of 25+ marks a strong trend) | 20.8 |
Momentum
3
| 14-day RSI | momentum is neutral — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 35, neither overbought (above 70) nor oversold (below 30) | 34.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Position in its 14-day range | it is trading in the lower half of its 14-day range ($2.61 to $2.93) — its "stochastic" reading is 25 out of 100, where 0 would mean closing exactly at the 14-session low and 100 exactly at the high. This measures WHERE the price sits inside its recent range, which is a different question from the RSI beside it: RSI is a momentum gauge, measuring how FAST the price has been moving, so a stock can drift quietly to the bottom of its range with an ordinary RSI, or fall sharply and still sit in the middle. It has been slipping within that range over the last few sessions. | 25.0 |
| Since the MACD crossed zero | MACD, a trend-momentum gauge, is in negative territory (momentum leaning bearish) | 41 sessions |
Range
12
| 52-week high | its highest closing price over the past year (about 252 trading days) was $3.79 | $3.79 |
|---|---|---|
| From the 52-week high | it is 29.0% below its 52-week high (its highest price of the past year) | -29.0% |
| Above the 52-week low | it is 56.9% above its 52-week low (its lowest price of the past year) | +56.9% |
| Below the 52-week high | it is 29.0% below its highest point of the past year | 29.0% |
| Since a 20-day breakout | it just made a new 20-day low, its first since 2026-07-31, breaking below its recent trading range | 1 session |
| Since a 55-day breakout | it just made a new 55-day low, its first since 2026-07-31, breaking below its recent trading range | 1 session |
| All-time high | its highest closing price on record is $42.30 (set on 2018-06-22) | $42.30 |
| Given back of the 52-week move | over the past year its closes ranged ($1.73 to $3.57), and it has given back around half of its rise from last year’s low — 48% of it. Chart-watchers call 61.8%-65% given back the "golden pocket" — for this company that is $2.37 to $2.43. It is watched widely enough that orders cluster there, which is the honest reason it matters; it is not a forecast. | 47.8% |
| From the all-time high | it is 93.6% below its all-time high | -93.6% |
| Nearest price level | it is trading 1.8% below a resistance level at $2.74 — a price it turned at five times since 2025-05-29, most recently on 2026-06-26. Since 2024-10-21 it has 8 such levels below the current price and 6 above. Levels like these describe where the price has reversed or paused before; they are not a forecast of where it will go. | +1.8% |
| All-time low | its lowest closing price on record is $0.56 (set on 2020-03-09) | $0.56 |
| Above the all-time low | it is 380.4% above its all-time low | +380.4% |
Volatility
5
| Band width vs its own 6 months | day-to-day price swings are narrower than usual versus its own recent 6-month history (tighter than about 88% of it) | 12th percentile |
|---|---|---|
| Typical daily range | in a typical session it travels about $0.1093 between its high and its low — about 4.1% of its price. That is its "average true range" over the last 14 sessions, which also counts the distance from the previous close, so a day that opens well away from yesterday counts as the large move it was | $0.1093 |
| Bollinger bands (20-day, ±2σ) | most of its recent trading has stayed between about $2.65 and $2.99 — the "Bollinger bands", a range drawn two standard deviations either side of its 20-day average price, which widens when the stock gets more volatile and narrows when it settles | $2.65 – $2.82 – $2.99 |
| Typical daily range (% of price) | its price moves about 4.1% in a typical session — about typical for the companies we cover. This is the average gap between a session's high and low over the last 14 sessions, counting overnight moves, expressed against the current price so it can be compared with companies trading at any price | 4.1% |
| Stretch from the 200-day average | it is trading 0.3 daily ranges below its 200-day average price (1.2% below it in plain percentage terms) — a way of asking how far it has stretched from its own average in units of how far it normally moves in a day, so a calm company and a jumpy one can be compared on the same scale | 0.3 daily ranges below its 200-day average |
Volume
1
| Volume vs its 30-day average | trading volume is about normal versus its 30-day average | 0.82× |
|---|
Candlestick patterns
3
| Since a doji | 2 sessions ago it opened and closed at almost the same price after trading through a wider range — a "doji", the classic picture of buyers and sellers finishing the session level | 2 sessions ago |
|---|---|---|
| Since a hammer | today, after a stretch of decline, it sold off hard during the session and then closed back near its high — a "hammer", the long lower wick showing the drop was bought back before the close | today |
| Since a bearish engulfing | 5 sessions ago it opened above the previous session's close and finished below that session's open — a "bearish engulfing" pair, where one down day more than undid the up day before it | 5 sessions ago |
Price gaps
2
| Gap at the open | it opened on 2026-10-20 0.7% above the previous session's close — an overnight gap, the part of the move that happened while the market was shut, and traded back through that level before the close | +0.7% |
|---|---|---|
| Gap filled | a 2.8% gap up opened on 2026-09-30 has been "filled" 14 sessions ago — price traded back through the level the gap left behind, and it closed again during the very session that opened it | 14 sessions ago |
Price streaks
1
| Closing streak | it has closed lower 3 sessions in a row, a -0.74% move over the run — an unbroken run of down days, which describes what has already happened and says nothing about the next session | 3 sessions down |
|---|
Relative strength
4
| vs market, 1 month | over the past 1 month this stock lagged the market by 16.4 percentage points (the stock lost 15.4% while the market gained 1.0%) | -16.4% |
|---|---|---|
| vs market, 3 months | over the past 3 months this stock lagged the market by 4.0 percentage points (the stock lost 0.4% while the market gained 3.6%) | -4.0% |
| vs market, 6 months | over the past 6 months this stock lagged the market by 2.6 percentage points (the stock gained 5.9% while the market gained 8.5%) | -2.6% |
| vs market, 12 months | over the past 12 months this stock beat the market by 6.6 percentage points (the stock gained 21.2% while the market gained 14.6%) | +6.6% |
Signal agreement
2
| Bullish technical signals | 1 of the 9 technical signals we can compute for it is currently in a bullish state: a "golden cross" — its 50-day average is above its 200-day — these describe past price behaviour, not a forecast | 1 of 9 |
|---|---|---|
| Bearish technical signals | 5 of the 9 technical signals we can compute for it are currently in a bearish state: trading below its 200-day average, a fresh 20-day low, MACD momentum is negative, lagging the market over 6 months, trading below the Ichimoku cloud — these describe past price behaviour, not a forecast | 5 of 9 |
Trend (Ichimoku cloud)
1
| Vs the Ichimoku cloud | trading 10% below the Ichimoku cloud — a band drawn from where its own highs and lows sat up to 2026-09-14 and projected forward over today's price, the side traders read as an established downtrend, with the band above acting as the level that would have to be cleared. The band itself is moderate, spanning 7.4% of the share price. | -10.4% |
|---|
Volume-weighted price
1
| Vs this year’s average price paid | the price is 3% below the average price paid so far this year, so the typical buyer over that stretch is under water. That average is $2.76 — a volume-weighted average of daily closes over 198 sessions, not a true tick-by-tick VWAP. | -2.7% |
|---|
Price levels it has turned at before
TUSK last closed at $2.69 on 2026-10-20. Since 2024-10-21 it has turned at 8 prices below its last close and 6 above; the 3 nearest below and the 3 nearest above are listed, nearest first.
| Level | Side | Distance | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| $2.74 | Resistance | 1.8% above the last close | turned there five times · 2025-05-29 to 2026-06-26 |
| $2.57 | Support | 4.4% below the last close | turned there four times · 2024-12-30 to 2026-07-20 |
| $2.82 | Resistance | 4.8% above the last close | turned there four times · 2025-01-13 to 2025-05-06 |
| $2.49 | Support | 7.5% below the last close | turned there twice · 2025-07-21 to 2026-07-29 |
| $2.44 | Support | 9.4% below the last close | turned there twice · 2025-08-27 to 2026-01-22 |
| $2.96 | Resistance | 10.0% above the last close | turned there five times · 2025-06-10 to 2026-08-24 |
A level is a price this company reversed or paused at more than once — they describe past behaviour, not a forecast of where the price will go.
Wave structure
Its recent swings can be read as a three-part upward correction — the A-B-C shape chartists use for a pullback — now complete.
This labelling fails — stops being a possible reading at all — if it closes above $3.29.
It is the only labelling that fits these swings, though its proportions are not the textbook ones. It was chosen from 3 labellings that survived the rules, counting shorter readings of the same bars.
This reading has stood for 28 trading days, since 2026-09-11.
Read from daily closes as of 2026-10-20.
An Elliott-wave count describes the swings already printed and the level that would disprove it. It is not a forecast, a target, or advice.
Screens: Trading below the 200-day moving average · Trading below the 50-day moving average · Pulled back from the 12-month high · Broke down to a new 20-day low · Printed a hammer candle after a decline · Trading below the Ichimoku cloud | Learn: moving average · golden cross · adx · rsi · breakout · fifty two week high low
Based on daily closing prices as of 2026-10-20. Describes past price behavior only — informational, not financial advice.
Key risks (from latest filing)
["exposure to commodity price volatility and energy market demand cycles","operational and credit risks associated with utility and infrastructure projects, including potential payment disputes and bankruptcy proceedings of clients like PREPA","risks related to aviation asset utilization and market demand for specialized equipment rentals"]
What changed in the latest 10-Q
AI-assisted comparison of TUSK's 10-Q filed 2026-05-11 against the prior one filed 2025-11-03.
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
- Added:
- Added reference to Form 10-K for year ended December 31, 2025, filed March 6, 2026 (newer filing dated 2026-05-11)
- Added new 'Aircraft Industry' section describing favorable operating environment for aircraft lease business
- Added Business Developments details: September 15, 2025 sale of natural sand proppant operations at Piranha Proppant LLC and December 2, 2025 sale of Aquawolf engineering services business for approximately $30.0 million
- Added statement that prior period segment information recast to conform with segment composition as of March 31, 2026
- Added new 'Infrastructure Industry' section describing fiber network construction and maintenance driven by AI and data center projects
- Added discussion of AI and high-performance computing driving fiber network upgrades and data capacity increases
- Added reference to Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA) funding programs including BEAD program
- Added Middle East conflict discussion noting attacks on regional energy infrastructure resulting in higher oil prices and multi-year LNG constraints
- Added statement about improved demand for services expected to continue through remainder of 2026
- Added LNG export capacity and electricity demand enhancement as positive trend factors
- Removed:
- Removed reference to Form 10-K for year ended December 31, 2024, filed March 7, 2025 (older filing dated 2025-11-03)
- Removed 'Utility Infrastructure Industry' section heading and related discussion
- Removed 'Settlement Agreement with PREPA' section entirely
- Removed discussion of natural sand proppant segment challenges during 2024
- Removed discussion of macroeconomic uncertainty, tariff implications, and OPEC+ production increases pressure on energy market in 2024-2025
- Removed 'Third Quarter 2025 Financial Overview' section and revenue comparison data
- Removed detailed discussion of infrastructure segment MSA contracts and volume fluctuation factors
- Removed discussion of PREPA bankruptcy proceedings and Cobra litigation (settled for $168.4 million in 2024)
- Reworded:
- Changed reference date for Risk Factors from December 31, 2024 to December 31, 2025
- Changed SEC filing date from March 7, 2025 to March 6, 2026
- Expanded Business Developments from two 2025 divestitures to four 2025 divestitures with added dates and details
- Changed segment recast reference date from September 30, 2025 to March 31, 2026
- Reordered industry sections to place Aircraft Industry first, followed by Oil and Natural Gas Industry, then Infrastructure Industry
- Notes:
- Newer filing appears truncated mid-sentence at end of Infrastructure Industry section, limiting assessment of complete content changes
- Some removals may reflect section reorganization rather than content elimination from the MD&A as a whole
Risk Factors
- Added:
- Employee retention and increasingly competitive labor market (added 2026-05-11)
- our ability to continue to grow our infrastructure services segment (added 2026-05-11)
- obsolescence of, or changes in overall demand for, our aircraft and flight equipment (added 2026-05-11)
- asset impairments (added 2026-05-11)
- access to and restrictions on use of sourced or produced water (added 2026-05-11)
- advances in technology (added 2026-05-11)
- Reference to Annual Report on Form 10–K for the year ended December 31, 2025 (added 2026-05-11)
- Removed:
- the impact of the recent divestitures of our subsidiaries 5 Star Electric, LLC, Higher Power Electrical, LLC and Python Equipment LLC as well as the sale of assets of Piranha Proppant LLC and the equipment previously used in our hydraulic fracturing services (removed 2026-05-11)
- the impact of reduced completions activity on utilization and pricing for our natural sand proppant services (removed 2026-05-11)
- conditions of U.S. oil and natural gas and utility infrastructure industry (removed 2026-05-11)
- our ability to comply with the applicable financial covenants and other terms and conditions our revolving credit facility (removed 2026-05-11)
- sustained weakness in the natural gas basins in which we operate and adverse impact on demand for our natural sand proppant services (removed 2026-05-11)
- technology (removed 2026-05-11)
- competition within the industries in which we operate (removed 2026-05-11)
- Reference to Annual Report on Form 10–K for the year ended December 31, 2024 (removed 2026-05-11)
- Reworded:
- the levels of capital expenditures by our customers and the impact on utilization and pricing for our services (changed from 'impact of reduced completions activity on utilization and pricing for our natural sand proppant services') (2026-05-11)
- conditions of U.S. oil and natural gas industry (changed from 'conditions of U.S. oil and natural gas and utility infrastructure industry') (2026-05-11)
- any loss of one or more of our significant customers and its impact on our revenue, financial condition and results of operations (changed from 'its impact on our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows') (2026-05-11)
- our ability to comply with the applicable financial covenants and other terms and conditions under our revolving credit facility (changed from 'under' missing in older version) (2026-05-11)
- competition within the energy services industry (changed from 'competition within the industries in which we operate') (2026-05-11)
- Notes:
- Financial statement sections are not directly comparable as they cover different reporting periods (March 31, 2026 vs. September 30, 2025) and reference different year-end comparisons (December 31, 2025 vs. December 31, 2024); however, the Risk Factors section text is directly comparable
- The removal of divestiture-related statements reflects actual business changes rather than policy modifications
AI-assisted comparison of two SEC filing sections. It describes wording and theme changes only, makes no materiality, legal, or investment judgement, and is not financial advice. Informational only — not financial advice.
Insider activity (SEC Form 4)
1 open-market purchase and 0 open-market sales by insiders in the last 90 days, of which we have read Form 4 filings through 2026-10-16. The 5 days since 2026-10-16 have not been checked yet.
- Last 90 days · read to 2026-10-161 buy ($15000) · 0 sells — 1 buying insider
- Last 180 days · read to 2026-10-166 buys ($11M) · 0 sells — 3 buying insiders
Activity heuristic: net buying (a transparent product heuristic from the counts above, not a prediction or advice)
Most recent open-market transaction: 2026-09-16. Based on Form 4 filings read through 2026-10-16; anything filed since is not yet included.
View full insider trading history → View SEC Form 3/4/5 filingsAsk about TUSK's insider activity →
Only open-market purchases (SEC code P) and sales (code S) are counted here. Option exercises, vesting/awards, gifts, and shares withheld for taxes are excluded — they are compensation or mechanical, not open-market conviction. Sales may be planned and non-discretionary (e.g. a Rule 10b5-1 plan) and are not necessarily bearish; open-market buying is not a recommendation to buy. Informational only — not financial advice.
Institutional ownership (13F)
5 institutional 13F filers reported holding TUSK as of 2026-06-30 (quarter-end position, filed within 45 days).
- Distinct 13F filers 5
- Reported shares held 2,001,177
- Reported value $6,503,827
reported quarterly holdings change (2026-03-31 → 2026-06-30): 0 new, 3 increased, 2 decreased, 0 exited. Change counts cover only managers that filed 13F reports in BOTH quarters, derived between two quarter-end snapshots — not same-day trades; a single manager is never said to have "bought" or "sold".
Institutional holdings are quarter-end long positions reported on SEC Form 13F-HR, filed up to 45 days after the quarter ends — they are delayed, are not real-time trades, exclude short positions and most non-US securities, and are not investment advice. Any increase/decrease is a reported change between two quarterly snapshots, not a same-day purchase or sale. These are quarter-end snapshots from the 13F filings on SEC EDGAR, filed within 45 days — not real-time, and any change is a difference between two quarterly reports, not a same-day trade. Informational only — not financial advice.
Ask about TUSK's institutional holders → See what each manager we track holds →
Short interest (FINRA)
TUSK had 110,518 shares of reported short interest as of the 2026-09-30 FINRA settlement date (delayed, bi-monthly; not real-time).
TUSK had 0.23% of its shares outstanding sold short as of the 2026-09-30 FINRA settlement date (percent of FLOAT would be higher — float is not disclosed in the source). FINRA reported 1.18 days to cover at the same settlement.
- Reported short interest (shares) 110,518
- Short interest (% of shares outstanding) 0.23%
- Prior settlement (shares) 88,848
- Reported change 24.39%
- Days to cover (reported) 1.18
Reported to FINRA as of the 2026-09-30 settlement date. Short interest is reported to FINRA and published on a delayed, bi-monthly schedule (as of a settlement date, disseminated roughly eight business days later) — it is NOT real-time, does not cover every venue or all US trading, and is not a short-squeeze prediction or investment advice. Days-to-cover is the value FINRA reports; percent of float is not shown because the source file carries no share-count denominator — where a percent appears it is of shares OUTSTANDING, the larger base, and is therefore a floor on percent of float. Informational only — not financial advice.
Competitors & peers
- Halliburton (HAL)
- Baker Hughes (BKR)
- Liberty Energy (LBRT)
- ProFrac Holding Corp
- U.S. Silica Holdings (SLCA)
- Quanta Services (PWR)
- MYR Group (MYRG)
AI-enriched competitor set. Linked names are companies covered by stocks-llm; other named peers are shown for reference only.
Compare TUSK vs…
Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. is found in…
TUSK ranks in…
Frequently asked questions
What does Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (TUSK) do?
Mammoth Energy Services is an integrated, growth-oriented company providing specialized equipment, products, and services primarily to the oil and natural gas, aviation, and utility infrastructure industries. Its core operations include equipment rentals (including aviation assets), directional drilling, natural sand proppant sales for hydraulic fracturing, and accommodation services for remote workers, alongside a focused fiber optic infrastructure services division.
What sector is Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (TUSK) in?
Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (TUSK) is classified in the Energy sector. Its industry is Oilfield Services & Equipment. It trades on NASDAQ.
Who are Mammoth Energy Services, Inc.'s (TUSK) competitors?
Notable peers of Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (TUSK) include Halliburton, Baker Hughes, Liberty Energy, ProFrac Holding Corp and U.S. Silica Holdings. This peer set is informational only — not financial advice.
Is Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (TUSK) overbought or oversold right now?
Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (TUSK) is currently neither overbought nor oversold — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 35, in the neutral middle (as of 2026-10-20). RSI describes recent price momentum, not a forecast — informational only, not financial advice.
Where does stocks-llm's data on TUSK come from?
Fundamentals come from SEC XBRL company filings for the figures marked with a fiscal year, and market data, as of 2026-09-02 for the rest; prices are market data, as of 2026-09-02; company filings and profile facts come from SEC EDGAR. All figures are delayed daily-close data shown with their as-of date — informational only, not financial advice.
Fundamentals: SEC XBRL company filings for the figures marked with a fiscal year, and market data, as of 2026-09-02 for the rest. Filings: SEC EDGAR. Prices are delayed daily-close data.
Last updated 2026-10-20.
Informational only — NOT financial advice. All figures are delayed daily-close data from SEC EDGAR & market data, shown with their as-of date.