Elliott wave 5 candidates (UK)
A technical stock screen computed nightly from daily-close price history (market data). Selection is deterministic — a company appears only when its stored indicator meets the screen's rule; nothing is estimated.
8 companies in the catalog currently match this technical screen. Leading the list, Galliford Try (GFRD.L) is its swings can be read as a five-part sequence now in leg 5, the final one on that reading — the reading fails if price closes below £5.81; the only labelling that fits.
| # | Company | Sector | Price | Signal |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Galliford Try (GFRD.L) | — | £6.20 | its swings can be read as a five-part sequence now in leg 5, the final one on that reading — the reading fails if price closes below £5.81; the only labelling that fits |
| 2 | Rathbones (RAT.L) | — | £17.02 | its swings can be read as a five-part sequence now in leg 5, the final one on that reading — the reading fails if price closes above £17.78; the only labelling that fits |
| 3 | SSP Group (SSPG.L) | — | £2.11 | its swings can be read as a five-part sequence now in leg 5, the final one on that reading — the reading fails if price closes below £1.81; the only labelling that fits |
| 4 | Bytes Technology Group (BYIT.L) | — | £4.16 | its swings can be read as a five-part sequence now in leg 5, the final one on that reading — the reading fails if price closes below £3.96; one of several labellings that fit |
| 5 | EasyJet (EZJ.L) | — | £6.74 | its swings can be read as a five-part sequence now in leg 5, the final one on that reading — the reading fails if price closes below £5.62; one of several labellings that fit |
| 6 | Hays (HAS.L) | — | £0.678 | its swings can be read as a five-part sequence now in leg 5, the final one on that reading — the reading fails if price closes below £0.563; one of several labellings that fit |
| 7 | ITV (ITV.L) | — | £0.709 | its swings can be read as a five-part sequence now in leg 5, the final one on that reading — the reading fails if price closes above £0.7695; one of several labellings that fit |
| 8 | Moonpig (MOON.L) | — | £2.84 | its swings can be read as a five-part sequence now in leg 5, the final one on that reading — the reading fails if price closes below £2.52; one of several labellings that fit |
Ask about these stocks in plain English →
Today's movers → · Browse all stocks → · Compare GFRD.L vs RAT.L →
What is an Elliott wave 5?
Elliott wave analysis reads a chart as a repeating shape: five legs in the direction of the larger trend (an "impulse"), then three legs against it (an "A-B-C correction"). We label the sequence of swing highs and lows a stock has actually printed and keep only labellings that survive the three rules the method treats as inviolable — wave 2 never gives back all of wave 1, wave 3 is never the shortest of waves 1, 3 and 5, and wave 4 never trades back into wave 1's range. Every count we show carries the price that would break it. Wave 5 is the last of the five legs. On that labelling the sequence would be nearing its end, which is why the count matters more here than anywhere else in the shape — and why the level that breaks it is on every row.
How do I read the Elliott wave 5 candidates (UK) screen?
This screen lists companies whose swings can be labelled as a five-part sequence currently in its final leg, strongest labellings first. A count reaching leg 5 is a description of the legs already printed; it is not a call that the move is about to end, and the labelling can extend or fail outright. This describes swings the stock has already printed, not what comes next. Elliott labelling is genuinely subjective — competent chartists routinely label the same chart differently, and more than one labelling usually survives the rules — so each row names the level at which its reading fails rather than asserting a target.
New to this? What is Impulse wave (the five-wave move)? →
Data: daily-close price history, recomputed nightly. Every figure is shown with its as-of date on the company page; a company without enough price history for this indicator is excluded, never estimated.
1 covered company was not evaluated for this screen because its price series ends on or before 2026-08-10 (DOM.L), at least 3 trading sessions behind the 2026-08-13 session the rest of the catalog carries. A technical signal is a claim about the present, so it is not asserted from a series that stops before it. That company keeps the readings it has on its own page, with the as-of date it was computed from. 1 covered company was not evaluated for this screen (MEGP.L) because our price history for this company shows an unadjusted split or scale break. Every indicator read from such a series is an artifact of that break rather than a fact about the company, so none of them is asserted here — which is why the same company has no 1-year return on its own page either.
Last updated 2026-08-11 — this screen recomputes nightly from daily-close prices, so its members change over time.
Informational only — NOT financial advice. Technical indicators describe past price behavior; they are not predictions. All figures are delayed daily-close data.