DOMO INC CLASS B (DOMO)
Information Technology · Cloud data platforms and business intelligence · NASDAQ
Domo is a cloud-based AI and data platform that enables enterprises to connect, analyze, and operationalize real-time data across their entire organization.
What DOMO INC CLASS B does
Domo is a cloud-based AI and data products platform founded in 2010 that digitally connects organizations with real-time data and insights. The platform combines data integration, transformation, analytics, visualization, automation, and application development within a single governed environment. It sits on top of major cloud data platforms like Snowflake and Databricks and includes over 1,000 connectors, low-code data transformation tools (Magic ETL), AI/ML capabilities, and workflow automation. Domo operates primarily on a consumption-based pricing model, with 89% of ARR utilizing this approach as of Q1 FY2026.
Themes: business intelligence, data analytics, AI infrastructure, data integration, low-code platforms, cloud software
Fundamentals
- Price$3.80 as of 2026-08-21 close
- Market cap$184M as of 2026-08-24
- 1-year return-71.9% 2025-08-21 close $13.54 → 2026-08-21 close $3.80
- P/En/a negative earnings
- Net margin-17.4% as of 2026-08-24
- Gross margin+74.9% as of 2026-08-24
- ROE-253.9% as of 2026-08-24
- Debt / equity4.57 as of 2026-08-24
- Revenue growth (YoY)+0.3% as of 2026-08-24
- Revenue CAGR (3y)+1.1% SEC XBRL
- Beta1.81 as of 2026-08-24
- Last reported earnings2026-06-15 SEC EDGAR Form 8-K (Item 2.02)
How DOMO compares in its sector
- net profit marginbottom 25% 405 covered Information Technology peers, as of 2026-08-24
- operating marginbottom 25% 405 covered Information Technology peers, as of 2026-08-24
- gross margintop 25% 403 covered Information Technology peers, as of 2026-08-24
- return on equitybottom 10% 405 covered Information Technology peers, as of 2026-08-24
- 3-year revenue CAGRmiddle range 386 covered Information Technology peers
- free cash flow (absolute dollars, latest fiscal year)bottom 25% 382 covered Information Technology peers, as of FY2026
Position among covered Information Technology companies that report each metric (minimum 5 peers). A relative position within our covered catalog — not a valuation, quality, or investment judgment. A higher percentile is simply a higher value (for P/E, more expensive on earnings — never "better"). Informational only.
How DOMO INC CLASS B looks technically
DOMO INC CLASS B (DOMO) is trading 32.5% below its 200-day average, the long-term trend line — a long-term downtrend. Its 50-day average crossed below its 200-day average about 167 trading days ago — a "death cross", a bearish long-term signal. There is no clear trend right now — the price is choppy (ADX, a 0–100 trend-strength gauge, is 18, below the 25 that marks a real trend). Momentum is neutral — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 53, neither overbought (above 70) nor oversold (below 30). MACD, a trend-momentum gauge, turned bearish about 5 trading days ago (its momentum flipped negative). It made a new 20-day high about 10 trading days ago. It is 79.4% below its highest point of the past year. Day-to-day price swings are unusually narrow versus its own recent history — a "Bollinger squeeze" (in the tightest 1% of the past ~6 months), which often precedes a bigger move. Trading volume is unusually light — only about 22% of its 30-day average.
Trend
8
| Distance from the 200-day | it is trading 32.5% below its 200-day average, the long-term trend line — a long-term downtrend | -32.5% |
|---|---|---|
| 50-day moving average | its average price over the last 50 trading days — a short-term trend line — is $3.40 | $3.40 |
| 200-day moving average | its average price over the last 200 trading days — the long-term trend line — is $5.63 | $5.63 |
| Swing structure | each recent peak has been higher than the one before it and each dip has been shallower — the pattern chart-watchers call an uptrend, which describes where price has already been and not where it goes next | higher highs and higher lows |
| Last swing turn | its last significant turn was a swing high 29 calendar days ago — the swings before that are what the structure reading is measured on | 29 sessions |
| Wave structure | its recent swings can be read as a completed three-part upward correction — a pullback in the A-B-C shape Elliott-wave chartists use; the labelling fails if price closes above 4.44. It is one of several labellings that fit, and it describes the swings already printed, not what comes next. The same swings also read as a five-part sequence in leg 4. | possible three-wave upward correction, complete (one of several readings) |
| Since the 50/200 cross | its 50-day average crossed below its 200-day average about 167 trading days ago — a "death cross", a bearish long-term signal | 167 sessions |
| Trend strength (14-day ADX) | there is no clear trend right now — the price is choppy (ADX, a 0–100 trend-strength gauge, is 18, below the 25 that marks a real trend) | 18.0 |
Momentum
3
| 14-day RSI | momentum is neutral — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 53, neither overbought (above 70) nor oversold (below 30) | 53.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Position in its 14-day range | it is trading in the lower half of its 14-day range ($3.69 to $4.06) — its "stochastic" reading is 31 out of 100, where 0 would mean closing exactly at the 14-session low and 100 exactly at the high. This measures WHERE the price sits inside its recent range, which is a different question from the RSI beside it: RSI is a momentum gauge, measuring how FAST the price has been moving, so a stock can drift quietly to the bottom of its range with an ordinary RSI, or fall sharply and still sit in the middle. It has been climbing within that range over the last few sessions. | 30.7 |
| Since the MACD crossed zero | MACD, a trend-momentum gauge, turned bearish about 5 trading days ago (its momentum flipped negative) | 5 sessions |
Range
12
| 52-week high | its highest closing price over the past year (about 252 trading days) was $18.49 | $18.49 |
|---|---|---|
| From the 52-week high | it is 79.4% below its 52-week high (its highest price of the past year) | -79.5% |
| Above the 52-week low | it is 106.5% above its 52-week low (its lowest price of the past year) | +106.5% |
| Below the 52-week high | it is 79.4% below its highest point of the past year | 79.5% |
| Since a 20-day breakout | it made a new 20-day high about 10 trading days ago | 10 sessions |
| Since a 55-day breakout | it made a new 55-day low about 46 trading days ago | 46 sessions |
| All-time high | its highest closing price on record is $98.35 (set on 2021-08-26) | $98.35 |
| Given back of the 52-week move | over the past year its closes ranged ($2.00 to $18.20), and it has recovered only a small part of its fall from last year’s high — 11% of it. Chart-watchers call 61.8%-65% given back the "golden pocket" — for this company that is $12.01 to $12.53. It is watched widely enough that orders cluster there, which is the honest reason it matters; it is not a forecast. | 11.1% |
| From the all-time high | it is 96.1% below its all-time high | -96.1% |
| Nearest price level | it is trading 6.0% below a resistance level at $4.03 — a price it turned at twice since 2026-05-19, most recently on 2026-08-11. Since 2024-08-21 it has 1 such level below the current price and 10 above. Levels like these describe where the price has reversed or paused before; they are not a forecast of where it will go. | +6.0% |
| All-time low | its lowest closing price on record is $1.84 (set on 2026-06-17) | $1.84 |
| Above the all-time low | it is 106.5% above its all-time low | +106.5% |
Volatility
5
| Band width vs its own 6 months | day-to-day price swings are unusually narrow versus its own recent history — a "Bollinger squeeze" (in the tightest 1% of the past ~6 months), which often precedes a bigger move | 0th percentile |
|---|---|---|
| Typical daily range | in a typical session it travels about $0.2011 between its high and its low — about 5.3% of its price. That is its "average true range" over the last 14 sessions, which also counts the distance from the previous close, so a day that opens well away from yesterday counts as the large move it was | $0.2011 |
| Bollinger bands (20-day, ±2σ) | most of its recent trading has stayed between about $3.58 and $4.04 — the "Bollinger bands", a range drawn two standard deviations either side of its 20-day average price, which widens when the stock gets more volatile and narrows when it settles | $3.58 – $3.81 – $4.04 |
| Typical daily range (% of price) | its price moves about 5.3% in a typical session — about typical for the companies we cover. This is the average gap between a session's high and low over the last 14 sessions, counting overnight moves, expressed against the current price so it can be compared with companies trading at any price | 5.3% |
| Stretch from the 200-day average | it is trading 9.1 daily ranges below its 200-day average price (32.5% below it in plain percentage terms) — a way of asking how far it has stretched from its own average in units of how far it normally moves in a day, so a calm company and a jumpy one can be compared on the same scale | 9.1 daily ranges below its 200-day average |
Volume
1
| Volume vs its 30-day average | trading volume is unusually light — only about 22% of its 30-day average | 0.22× |
|---|
Analyst
2
| Change in the average price target | analysts' average price target is unchanged from the prior reading | 0.0% |
|---|---|---|
| Change in the consensus rating | the analyst consensus rating is unchanged since the prior reading | unchanged |
Candlestick patterns
1
| Since a bullish engulfing | 6 sessions ago it opened below the previous session's close and finished above that session's open — a "bullish engulfing" pair, where one up day more than undid the down day before it | 6 sessions ago |
|---|
Price gaps
3
| Gap at the open | it opened on 2026-08-21 0.5% above the previous session's close — an overnight gap, the part of the move that happened while the market was shut, and traded back through that level before the close | +0.5% |
|---|---|---|
| Open gap | it gapped 36.0% above the previous close 21 sessions ago and has not traded back through the level it left behind at 3.15 — an "unfilled gap", which describes a price range no trade has since crossed and is not a forecast that it will be crossed | +36.0% |
| Gap filled | a 2.1% gap up opened on 2026-08-05 has been "filled" 12 sessions ago — price traded back through the level the gap left behind, and it closed again during the very session that opened it | 12 sessions ago |
Price streaks
1
| Closing streak | it has closed higher 2 sessions in a row, a +1.6% move over the run — an unbroken run of up days, which describes what has already happened and says nothing about the next session | 2 sessions up |
|---|
Relative strength
4
| vs market, 1 month | over the past 1 month this stock beat the market by 8.1 percentage points (the stock gained 10.5% while the market gained 2.3%) | +8.1% |
|---|---|---|
| vs market, 3 months | over the past 3 months this stock beat the market by 3.0 percentage points (the stock gained 6.1% while the market gained 3.1%) | +3.0% |
| vs market, 6 months | over the past 6 months this stock lagged the market by 13.6 percentage points (the stock lost 2.6% while the market gained 11.1%) | -13.6% |
| vs market, 12 months | over the past 12 months this stock lagged the market by 92.4 percentage points (the stock lost 71.9% while the market gained 20.5%) | -92.4% |
Signal agreement
2
| Bullish technical signals | 1 of the 9 technical signals we can compute for it is currently in a bullish state: trading above the Ichimoku cloud — these describe past price behaviour, not a forecast | 1 of 9 |
|---|---|---|
| Bearish technical signals | 4 of the 9 technical signals we can compute for it are currently in a bearish state: a "death cross" — its 50-day average is below its 200-day, trading below its 200-day average, MACD momentum is negative, lagging the market over 6 months — these describe past price behaviour, not a forecast | 4 of 9 |
Trend (Ichimoku cloud)
1
| Vs the Ichimoku cloud | trading 17% above the Ichimoku cloud — a band drawn from where its own highs and lows sat up to 2026-07-16 and projected forward over today's price, the side traders read as an established uptrend, with the band below acting as the level that would have to give way. The band itself is moderate, spanning 3.1% of the share price. | +16.9% |
|---|
Volume-weighted price
2
| Vs this year’s average price paid | the price is 3% below the average price paid so far this year, so the typical buyer over that stretch is under water. That average is $3.90 — a volume-weighted average of daily closes over 155 sessions, not a true tick-by-tick VWAP. | -2.7% |
|---|---|---|
| Vs the average paid since it last reported | the price is 19% above the average price paid since it last reported on 2026-06-15 (its 10-Q), so the typical buyer over that stretch is showing a gain. That average is $3.21 — a volume-weighted average of daily closes over 48 sessions, not a true tick-by-tick VWAP. | +18.5% |
Price levels it has turned at before
DOMO last closed at $3.80 on 2026-08-21. Since 2024-08-21 it has turned at 1 price below its last close and 10 above; the nearest below and the 3 nearest above are listed, nearest first.
| Level | Side | Distance | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| $4.03 | Resistance | 6.0% above the last close | turned there twice · 2026-05-19 to 2026-08-11 |
| $4.11 | Resistance | 8.1% above the last close | turned there twice · 2026-04-21 to 2026-05-04 |
| $3.32 | Support | 12.6% below the last close | turned there twice · 2026-04-30 to 2026-05-14 |
| $6.62 | Resistance | 74.2% above the last close | turned there four times · 2024-09-23 to 2026-01-28 |
A level is a price this company reversed or paused at more than once — they describe past behaviour, not a forecast of where the price will go.
Wave structure
Its recent swings can be read as a three-part upward correction — the A-B-C shape chartists use for a pullback — now complete.
This labelling fails — stops being a possible reading at all — if it closes above $4.44.
This is one of several labellings that fit the same swings, so treat it as a reading rather than the reading. It was chosen from 2 labellings that survived the rules, counting shorter readings of the same bars.
Alternate reading: The same swings also read as a five-part sequence in leg 4, which fails on a close below $3.75.
This reading has stood for 1 trading day, since 2026-08-21.
Read from daily closes as of 2026-08-21.
An Elliott-wave count describes the swings already printed and the level that would disprove it. It is not a forecast, a target, or advice.
Screens: Trading below the 200-day moving average · Pulled back from the 12-month high · MACD just crossed bearish (12/26/9) · in a Bollinger Band volatility squeeze · trendless / choppy (low ADX) · lagging the market | Learn: moving average · golden cross · adx · rsi · macd · breakout · fifty two week high low · bollinger bands · volume and relative volume
Based on daily closing prices as of 2026-08-21. Describes past price behavior only — informational, not financial advice.
Analyst consensus
- Consensus ratingHold (2.83 mean, 1=Strong Buy…5=Strong Sell) — 6 analysts
- Mean price target$3.93 range $2.25 – $5.00; median $4.00
Analyst estimates, as of 2026-08-19. These are third-party analyst opinions and price targets, aggregated — not a recommendation, prediction, or advice from stocks-llm. Informational only.
Analyst EPS estimate for DOMO
- Consensus EPS estimate$0.00167 next reporting period, as of 2026-08-19
Change over time is not available yet: it needs two readings of the same reporting period at least 30 days apart, and we have been recording these estimates since 2026-08-04. An estimate for a DIFFERENT quarter is not a revision, so a reading from before the last report is never compared with one after it.
The consensus estimate for the next reporting period, and how it has moved between readings of that SAME period. A change is measured only between readings estimating one period — when a company reports, the consensus moves to the next quarter and the two numbers are not comparable. Informational only, not a forecast and not advice.
Key risks (from latest filing)
["Company is unprofitable with net margin of -17.43% and annual net losses of $59–81 million; ability to achieve and maintain future profitability is uncertain.","Significant transition risk from subscription-based to consumption-based pricing model, which could impact revenue recognition and customer predictability.","Highly competitive market; ability to compete successfully against established data platforms and respond to rapid technological changes is critical."]
What changed in the latest 10-Q
AI-assisted comparison of DOMO's 10-Q filed 2026-06-15 against the prior one filed 2025-12-09.
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
- Added:
- Newer filing includes statement that customers can adopt platform 'in whole or in part' as consumption-based service (filed 2026-06-15)
- Newer filing specifies that 89% of ARR was utilizing consumption-based service as of April 30, 2026, compared to 80% in older filing (filed 2026-06-15)
- Newer filing states total RPO was $437.3 million as of April 30, 2026, with $239.6 million expected in next twelve months (filed 2026-06-15)
- Newer filing reports net loss of $14.2 million for three months ended April 30, 2026 (filed 2026-06-15)
- Newer filing states accumulated deficit of $1,561.1 million at April 30, 2026 (filed 2026-06-15)
- Removed:
- Older filing contained narrative about consumption-based service helping increase customer adoption and improving land, expand, retain strategy and sales/marketing productivity (filed 2025-12-09)
- Older filing contained language that consumption-based offering removes barriers to adoption and aligns pricing to value delivered (filed 2025-12-09)
- Older filing included comparison that 74% of customers were under multi-year contracts as of October 31, 2025, compared to 69% as of January 31, 2025 (filed 2025-12-09)
- Older filing included nine-month revenue data showing $238.3 million and $239.2 million for nine months ended October 31, 2024 and 2025 (filed 2025-12-09)
- Older filing stated net loss of $18.8 million (text appears truncated in older version) (filed 2025-12-09)
- Reworded:
- Older filing said business leaders 'are the typical initial subscribers' changed to 'are typically initial subscribers' in newer (filed 2026-06-15)
- Older filing said 'to enable departmental access' changed to 'enable departmental access' in newer (filed 2026-06-15)
- Older filing said 'facilitate broad enterprise adoption' changed to 'facilitate broader adoption' in newer (filed 2026-06-15)
- Older filing said 'an estimated volume of usage' changed to 'estimated usage' in newer (filed 2026-06-15)
- Older filing said 'We also believe this offering' and related benefits language completely removed in newer filing (filed 2026-06-15)
- Older filing said 'We have also offered' changed to 'Historically, we also offered' in newer (filed 2026-06-15)
- Older filing said 'subscription-based service' changed to 'subscription-based agreements' in newer (filed 2026-06-15)
- Notes:
- Comparison uses different fiscal period end dates: newer filing is for quarter ended April 30, 2026; older filing is for quarter ended October 31, 2025
- RPO and multi-year contract comparison periods differ between filings due to different fiscal quarter ends
- Older filing text appears truncated at end of net loss sentence, limiting complete comparison of loss figures
Risk Factors
- Added:
- Added reference to 'substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern' in context of noncompliance with financial covenant under credit facility as of April 30, 2026 (filed 2026-06-15)
- Added statement: 'Our need to raise additional capital or complete a potential transaction is heightened by our noncompliance with a financial covenant under our credit facility as of April 30, 2026 and the resulting substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern' (filed 2026-06-15)
- Removed:
- Removed reference to 'no amounts were available to draw under our credit facility' statement that appeared in older version (filed 2025-12-09)
- Reworded:
- Net loss figures updated from '$64.3 million and $51.4 million for the nine months ended October 31, 2024 and 2025' to '$18.1 million and $14.2 million for the three months ended April 30, 2025 and 2026' (filed 2026-06-15)
- Accumulated deficit updated from '$1,538.9 million at October 31, 2025' to '$1,561.1 million at April 30, 2026' (filed 2026-06-15)
- Cash flow description changed from 'cash used in operating activities of $18.0 million and cash provided by operating activities of $10.7 million for the nine months ended October 31, 2024 and 2025' to 'cash provided by operating activities of $4.0 million and $5.2 million for the three months ended April 30, 2025 and 2026' (filed 2026-06-15)
- Cash and equivalents amount updated from '$47.9 million of cash and cash equivalents, which were held for working capital purposes' to '$39.1 million of cash and cash equivalents, which were held for working capital purposes' (filed 2026-06-15)
- Page number changed from 45 to 41 (filed 2026-06-15)
- Notes:
- The newer filing text appears truncated at the end ('Additional financing may not be available on favorable ter'), preventing full comparison of the final sentence and any subsequent content
- Comparison is limited to the provided text excerpts only; full document may contain additional changes
AI-assisted comparison of two SEC filing sections. It describes wording and theme changes only, makes no materiality, legal, or investment judgement, and is not financial advice. Informational only — not financial advice.
Insider activity (SEC Form 4)
0 open-market purchases and 7 open-market sales by insiders in the last 90 days.
- Last 90 days0 buys · 7 sells ($1M) — 4 selling insiders
- Last 180 days1 buy ($2M) · 14 sells ($4M) — 1 buying, 4 selling insiders
Activity heuristic: net selling (a transparent product heuristic from the counts above, not a prediction or advice)
Most recent open-market transaction: 2026-06-24. As of 2026-08-24.
View full insider trading history → View SEC Form 3/4/5 filingsAsk about DOMO's insider activity →
Only open-market purchases (SEC code P) and sales (code S) are counted here. Option exercises, vesting/awards, gifts, and shares withheld for taxes are excluded — they are compensation or mechanical, not open-market conviction. Sales may be planned and non-discretionary (e.g. a Rule 10b5-1 plan) and are not necessarily bearish; open-market buying is not a recommendation to buy. Informational only — not financial advice.
Institutional ownership (13F)
4 institutional 13F filers reported holding DOMO as of 2026-03-31 (quarter-end position, filed within 45 days).
- Distinct 13F filers 4
- Reported shares held 5,591,216
- Reported value $17,109,120
reported quarterly holdings change (2025-12-31 → 2026-03-31): 0 new, 3 increased, 1 decreased, 1 exited. Change counts cover only managers that filed 13F reports in BOTH quarters, derived between two quarter-end snapshots — not same-day trades; a single manager is never said to have "bought" or "sold".
Institutional holdings are quarter-end long positions reported on SEC Form 13F-HR, filed up to 45 days after the quarter ends — they are delayed, are not real-time trades, exclude short positions and most non-US securities, and are not investment advice. Any increase/decrease is a reported change between two quarterly snapshots, not a same-day purchase or sale. These are quarter-end snapshots from the 13F filings on SEC EDGAR, filed within 45 days — not real-time, and any change is a difference between two quarterly reports, not a same-day trade. Informational only — not financial advice.
Short interest (FINRA)
DOMO had 6,419,424 shares of reported short interest as of the 2026-07-31 FINRA settlement date (delayed, bi-monthly; not real-time).
Short interest as a percent of shares outstanding is not shown for DOMO because we do not hold a verified share count to divide it by. The reported figures above are unaffected.
- Reported short interest (shares) 6,419,424
- Prior settlement (shares) 4,033,282
- Reported change 59.16%
- Days to cover (reported) 1.6
Reported to FINRA as of the 2026-07-31 settlement date. Short interest is reported to FINRA and published on a delayed, bi-monthly schedule (as of a settlement date, disseminated roughly eight business days later) — it is NOT real-time, does not cover every venue or all US trading, and is not a short-squeeze prediction or investment advice. Days-to-cover is the value FINRA reports; percent of float is not shown because the source file carries no share-count denominator — where a percent appears it is of shares OUTSTANDING, the larger base, and is therefore a floor on percent of float. Informational only — not financial advice.
Competitors & peers
- Snowflake (SNOW)
- Databricks
- Tableau (acquired by Salesforce)
- Power BI (Microsoft)
- Looker (acquired by Google)
- Informatica
- Apache Airflow ecosystem vendors
AI-enriched competitor set. Linked names are companies covered by stocks-llm; other named peers are shown for reference only.
Compare DOMO vs…
DOMO INC CLASS B is found in…
DOMO ranks in…
DOMO shows up in…
Frequently asked questions
What does DOMO INC CLASS B (DOMO) do?
Domo is a cloud-based AI and data products platform founded in 2010 that digitally connects organizations with real-time data and insights. The platform combines data integration, transformation, analytics, visualization, automation, and application development within a single governed environment. It sits on top of major cloud data platforms like Snowflake and Databricks and includes over 1,000 connectors, low-code data transformation tools (Magic ETL), AI/ML capabilities, and workflow…
What sector is DOMO INC CLASS B (DOMO) in?
DOMO INC CLASS B (DOMO) is classified in the Information Technology sector. Its industry is Cloud data platforms and business intelligence. It trades on NASDAQ.
Who are DOMO INC CLASS B's (DOMO) competitors?
Notable peers of DOMO INC CLASS B (DOMO) include Snowflake, Databricks, Tableau (acquired by Salesforce), Power BI (Microsoft) and Looker (acquired by Google). This peer set is informational only — not financial advice.
Is DOMO INC CLASS B (DOMO) overbought or oversold right now?
DOMO INC CLASS B (DOMO) is currently neither overbought nor oversold — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 53, in the neutral middle (as of 2026-08-21). RSI describes recent price momentum, not a forecast — informational only, not financial advice.
Where does stocks-llm's data on DOMO come from?
Fundamentals and prices come from market data, as of 2026-08-24; company filings and profile facts come from SEC EDGAR. All figures are delayed daily-close data shown with their as-of date — informational only, not financial advice.
Fundamentals: market data, as of 2026-08-24. Filings: SEC EDGAR. Prices are delayed daily-close data.
Last updated 2026-08-21.
Informational only — NOT financial advice. All figures are delayed daily-close data from SEC EDGAR & market data, shown with their as-of date.