Skip to content

Snowflake Inc. (SNOW)

Information Technology · Cloud Data Platform · NYSE

Snowflake is a leading AI Data Cloud platform that enables organizations to unify, govern, and derive intelligence from their data silos across global cloud environments.

What Snowflake Inc. does

Snowflake operates an AI Data Cloud platform that enables organizations to consolidate, analyze, and share data across a cloud-native architecture with independently scalable storage, compute, and cloud services layers. The platform addresses data silos and governance challenges by allowing customers to unify data from multiple sources, apply AI and analytics, and securely share data products without copying underlying data. Revenue is generated primarily through consumption-based pricing on compute, storage, and data transfer resources across three major public clouds in 55 regional deployments globally.

Themes: AI infrastructure, Cloud Computing, Data Analytics, Data Engineering, Artificial Intelligence, Data Sharing / Collaboration, SaaS / Consumption-based models

Fundamentals

  • Price$332.78 as of 2026-08-21 close
  • Market cap$115.3B as of 2026-08-21
  • 1-year return+70.9% 2025-08-21 close $194.68 → 2026-08-21 close $332.78
  • P/En/a negative earnings
  • Net margin-23.8% as of 2026-08-24
  • Gross margin+67.2% as of 2026-08-24
  • ROE-57.2% as of 2026-08-24
  • Debt / equity1.18 as of 2026-08-24
  • Revenue growth (YoY)+31.1% as of 2026-08-24
  • Revenue CAGR (3y)+31.4% SEC XBRL
  • Beta1.38 as of 2026-08-24
  • Last reported earnings2026-05-27 SEC EDGAR Form 8-K (Item 2.02)

Ask why SNOW looks like this →

How SNOW compares in its sector

  • net profit marginbottom 25% 405 covered Information Technology peers, as of 2026-08-24
  • operating marginbottom 25% 405 covered Information Technology peers, as of 2026-08-24
  • gross marginmiddle range 403 covered Information Technology peers, as of 2026-08-24
  • return on equitybottom 25% 405 covered Information Technology peers, as of 2026-08-24
  • 3-year revenue CAGRtop 25% 386 covered Information Technology peers
  • free cash flow (absolute dollars, latest fiscal year)top 25% 382 covered Information Technology peers, as of FY2026

Position among covered Information Technology companies that report each metric (minimum 5 peers). A relative position within our covered catalog — not a valuation, quality, or investment judgment. A higher percentile is simply a higher value (for P/E, more expensive on earnings — never "better"). Informational only.

Ask how SNOW stacks up against peers →

Top 10 scores & list membership

SNOW is not currently in any published Top 10 list. Its scores are below.

Long-term score

Not scored for the long-term list: no shareholder return data.

Short-term score

60.8 #172 of 1,704 scored · #29 of 261 in Information Technology

  • Trend84.1
  • Momentum60.0
  • Setup45.9
  • Volume and participation44.7
  • Catalysts59.5

Trend 84th: the price is 27% above the average price paid over the period covered, so the typical buyer over that stretch is showing a gain; momentum 60th: over the past 3 months this stock beat the market by 97.9 percentage points; weakest is volume and participation 45th: trading volume is about normal versus its 30-day average.

Scores as of 21 Aug 2026. Each bar is a percentile: how this company ranked against every company the score ranked, 0–100. A list is a published formula and its output, not a recommendation. Method version 2.

How Snowflake Inc. looks technically

Snowflake Inc. (SNOW) is trading 53.9% above its 200-day average, the long-term trend line — a longer-term uptrend. Its 50-day average crossed above its 200-day average about 30 trading days ago — a "golden cross", a bullish long-term signal. A strong uptrend is in place — ADX, a 0–100 trend-strength gauge, is 35, with buyers in control. Momentum is neutral — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 69, neither overbought (above 70) nor oversold (below 30). MACD, a trend-momentum gauge, turned bearish about 4 trading days ago (its momentum flipped negative). It made a new 20-day high about 7 trading days ago. It is 2.7% below its 52-week high (its highest price of the past year).

Trend

8
Distance from the 200-dayit is trading 53.9% above its 200-day average, the long-term trend line — a longer-term uptrend+54.0%
50-day moving averageits average price over the last 50 trading days — a short-term trend line — is $278.64$278.64
200-day moving averageits average price over the last 200 trading days — the long-term trend line — is $216.16$216.16
Swing structureeach recent peak has been higher than the one before it and each dip has been shallower — the pattern chart-watchers call an uptrend, which describes where price has already been and not where it goes nexthigher highs and higher lows
Last swing turnits last significant turn was a swing high 9 calendar days ago — the swings before that are what the structure reading is measured on9 sessions
Wave structureits recent swings can be read as a five-part upward sequence — what Elliott-wave chartists call an impulse — now in the fourth leg, a pullback against that upward direction; the labelling fails if price closes below 279.4899. It is one of several labellings that fit, and it describes the swings already printed, not what comes next. The same swings also read as a completed three-part correction.possible upward five-wave sequence, in wave 4 (one of several readings)
Since the 50/200 crossits 50-day average crossed above its 200-day average about 30 trading days ago — a "golden cross", a bullish long-term signal30 sessions
Trend strength (14-day ADX)a strong uptrend is in place — ADX, a 0–100 trend-strength gauge, is 35, with buyers in control35.2

Momentum

3
14-day RSImomentum is neutral — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 69, neither overbought (above 70) nor oversold (below 30)69.1
Position in its 14-day rangeit is trading in the upper half of its 14-day range ($301.90 to $341.95) — its "stochastic" reading is 77 out of 100, where 0 would mean closing exactly at the 14-session low and 100 exactly at the high. This measures WHERE the price sits inside its recent range, which is a different question from the RSI beside it: RSI is a momentum gauge, measuring how FAST the price has been moving, so a stock can drift quietly to the bottom of its range with an ordinary RSI, or fall sharply and still sit in the middle. It has been climbing within that range over the last few sessions.77.1
Since the MACD crossed zeroMACD, a trend-momentum gauge, turned bearish about 4 trading days ago (its momentum flipped negative)4 sessions

Range

12
52-week highits highest closing price over the past year (about 252 trading days) was $341.95$341.95
From the 52-week highit is 2.7% below its 52-week high (its highest price of the past year)-2.7%
Above the 52-week lowit is 181.3% above its 52-week low (its lowest price of the past year)+181.3%
Below the 52-week highit is 2.7% below its highest point of the past year2.7%
Since a 20-day breakoutit made a new 20-day high about 7 trading days ago7 sessions
Since a 55-day breakoutit made a new 55-day high about 7 trading days ago7 sessions
All-time highits highest closing price on record is $429.00 (set on 2020-12-08)$429.00
Given back of the 52-week moveover the past year its closes ranged ($121.11 to $337.38), and it has given back only a small part of its rise from last year’s low — 2% of it. Chart-watchers call 61.8%-65% given back the "golden pocket" — for this company that is $196.80 to $203.73. It is watched widely enough that orders cluster there, which is the honest reason it matters; it is not a forecast.2.1%
From the all-time highit is 22.4% below its all-time high-22.4%
Nearest price levelit is trading 16.3% above a support level at $278.64 — a price it turned at three times since 2025-11-03, most recently on 2026-07-21. Since 2024-08-21 it has 17 such levels below the current price and 0 above. Levels like these describe where the price has reversed or paused before; they are not a forecast of where it will go.-16.3%
All-time lowits lowest closing price on record is $6.95 (set on 2016-01-11)$6.95
Above the all-time lowit is 4688.2% above its all-time low+4,688%

Volatility

5
Band width vs its own 6 monthsday-to-day price swings are about average versus its own recent 6-month history56th percentile
Typical daily rangein a typical session it travels about $13.11 between its high and its low — about 3.9% of its price. That is its "average true range" over the last 14 sessions, which also counts the distance from the previous close, so a day that opens well away from yesterday counts as the large move it was$13.11
Bollinger bands (20-day, ±2σ)most of its recent trading has stayed between about $274.48 and $356.43 — the "Bollinger bands", a range drawn two standard deviations either side of its 20-day average price, which widens when the stock gets more volatile and narrows when it settles$274.48 – $315.46 – $356.43
Typical daily range (% of price)its price moves about 3.9% in a typical session — about typical for the companies we cover. This is the average gap between a session's high and low over the last 14 sessions, counting overnight moves, expressed against the current price so it can be compared with companies trading at any price3.9%
Stretch from the 200-day averageit is trading 8.9 daily ranges above its 200-day average price (54.0% above it in plain percentage terms) — a way of asking how far it has stretched from its own average in units of how far it normally moves in a day, so a calm company and a jumpy one can be compared on the same scale8.9 daily ranges above its 200-day average

Volume

1
Volume vs its 30-day averagetrading volume is about normal versus its 30-day average0.76×

Analyst

2
Change in the average price targetanalysts have raised their average price target by 1.7% since the prior reading+1.7%
Change in the consensus ratingthe analyst consensus rating has softened toward "sell" since the prior reading0.02 toward sell

Candlestick patterns

3
Since a doji2 sessions ago it opened and closed at almost the same price after trading through a wider range — a "doji", the classic picture of buyers and sellers finishing the session level2 sessions ago
Since a hammer2 sessions ago, after a stretch of decline, it sold off hard during the session and then closed back near its high — a "hammer", the long lower wick showing the drop was bought back before the close2 sessions ago
Since a bearish engulfing5 sessions ago it opened above the previous session's close and finished below that session's open — a "bearish engulfing" pair, where one down day more than undid the up day before it5 sessions ago

Price gaps

3
Gap at the openit opened on 2026-08-21 0.1% above the previous session's close — an overnight gap, the part of the move that happened while the market was shut, and traded back through that level before the close+0.1%
Open gapit gapped 2.4% above the previous close 17 sessions ago and has not traded back through the level it left behind at 270.36 — an "unfilled gap", which describes a price range no trade has since crossed and is not a forecast that it will be crossed+2.4%
Gap filleda 2.6% gap up opened on 2026-07-27 has been "filled" 19 sessions ago — price traded back through the level the gap left behind, and it closed again during the very session that opened it19 sessions ago

Price streaks

1
Closing streakit closed higher in its latest session, after a session that did not close higher — a single up day rather than a run1 session up

Relative strength

4
vs market, 1 monthover the past 1 month this stock beat the market by 20.1 percentage points (the stock gained 22.5% while the market gained 2.3%)+20.1%
vs market, 3 monthsover the past 3 months this stock beat the market by 97.9 percentage points (the stock gained 101.0% while the market gained 3.1%)+97.9%
vs market, 6 monthsover the past 6 months this stock beat the market by 81.9 percentage points (the stock gained 92.9% while the market gained 11.1%)+81.8%
vs market, 12 monthsover the past 12 months this stock beat the market by 50.5 percentage points (the stock gained 70.9% while the market gained 20.5%)+50.5%

Signal agreement

2
Bullish technical signals5 of the 9 technical signals we can compute for it are currently in a bullish state: a strong uptrend, with buyers in control, a "golden cross" — its 50-day average is above its 200-day, trading above its 200-day average, outperforming the market over 6 months, trading above the Ichimoku cloud — these describe past price behaviour, not a forecast5 of 9
Bearish technical signals1 of the 9 technical signals we can compute for it is currently in a bearish state: MACD momentum is negative — these describe past price behaviour, not a forecast1 of 9

Trend (Ichimoku cloud)

1
Vs the Ichimoku cloudtrading 29% above the Ichimoku cloud — a band drawn from where its own highs and lows sat up to 2026-07-16 and projected forward over today's price, the side traders read as an established uptrend, with the band below acting as the level that would have to give way. The band itself is thick, spanning 14.5% of the share price, which is taken to mean a barrier that has held for a while and takes effort to cross.+29.4%

Volume-weighted price

2
Vs this year’s average price paidthe price is 64% above the average price paid so far this year, so the typical buyer over that stretch is showing a gain. That average is $203.20 — a volume-weighted average of daily closes over 158 sessions, not a true tick-by-tick VWAP.+63.8%
Vs the average paid since it last reportedthe price is 27% above the average price paid since it last reported on 2026-05-27 (its 8-K), so the typical buyer over that stretch is showing a gain. That average is $262.84 — a volume-weighted average of daily closes over 59 sessions, not a true tick-by-tick VWAP.+26.6%

Price levels it has turned at before

SNOW last closed at $332.78 on 2026-08-21. Since 2024-08-21 it has turned at 17 prices below its last close and 0 above; the 3 nearest below are listed, nearest first.

LevelSideDistanceEvidence
$278.64Support16.3% below the last closeturned there three times · 2025-11-03 to 2026-07-21
$252.99Support24.0% below the last closeturned there four times · 2025-08-28 to 2026-07-28
$236.14Support29.0% below the last closeturned there twice · 2025-10-17 to 2026-01-08

A level is a price this company reversed or paused at more than once — they describe past behaviour, not a forecast of where the price will go.

Wave structure

Its recent swings can be read as a five-part upward sequence — what Elliott-wave chartists call an impulse — now in leg 4 of five, a pullback against that direction.

This labelling fails — stops being a possible reading at all — if it closes below $279.49.

This is one of several labellings that fit the same swings, so treat it as a reading rather than the reading. It was chosen from 2 labellings that survived the rules, counting shorter readings of the same bars.

On past moves of this shape the leg has usually ended somewhere between $297.77 and $321.10 — that is where it has tended to end if the count holds, not a forecast of where the price goes.

Alternate reading: The same swings also read as a completed three-part correction, which fails on a close above $341.95.

This reading has stood for 3 trading days, since 2026-08-19.

Read from daily closes as of 2026-08-21.

An Elliott-wave count describes the swings already printed and the level that would disprove it. It is not a forecast, a target, or advice.

Based on daily closing prices as of 2026-08-21. Describes past price behavior only — informational, not financial advice.

Ask about SNOW's technicals →

Analyst consensus

  • Consensus ratingBuy (1.51 mean, 1=Strong Buy…5=Strong Sell) — 48 analysts
  • Mean price target$321.35 range $110.00 – $500.00; median $320.00

Analyst estimates, as of 2026-08-24. These are third-party analyst opinions and price targets, aggregated — not a recommendation, prediction, or advice from stocks-llm. Informational only.

Analyst EPS estimate for SNOW

  • Consensus EPS estimate$0.447 next reporting period, as of 2026-08-24

Change over time is not available yet: it needs two readings of the same reporting period at least 30 days apart, and we have been recording these estimates since 2026-08-04. An estimate for a DIFFERENT quarter is not a revision, so a reading from before the last report is never compared with one after it.

The consensus estimate for the next reporting period, and how it has moved between readings of that SAME period. A change is measured only between readings estimating one period — when a company reports, the consensus moves to the next quarter and the two numbers are not comparable. Informational only, not a forecast and not advice.

Ask how SNOW's estimates have moved →

Key risks (from latest filing)

["Dependency on third-party public cloud providers for infrastructure.","Risk associated with maintaining high growth and profitability while scaling operations.","Security and compliance risks related to processing sensitive customer data."]

See SNOW's biggest risks from its latest 10-Q →

What changed in the latest 10-Q

AI-assisted comparison of SNOW's 10-Q filed 2026-05-29 against the prior one filed 2025-12-05.

Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)

  • Added:
    • Reference to fiscal year ended January 31, 2026 and Form 10-K filed March 20, 2026 (newer filing)
    • Description of storage layer ingesting data and compute layer creating governed, unified data records that are AI ready and written back to storage layer (newer filing)
    • Description of cloud services layer enabling users to securely use AI within applications, tools, and processes (newer filing)
    • Specification of 55 regional deployments around the world (newer filing)
    • Statement that platform is used through consumption-based business model without specifying 'only charging customers for the resources they use' (newer filing)
    • Net revenue retention rate of 126% and 125% as of April 30, 2026 and January 31, 2026 respectively (newer filing)
    • Total customers of 13,912 as of April 30, 2026, increasing from 13,296 as of January 31, 2026 (newer filing)
    • Reference to resellers and distributors in addition to direct sales force (newer filing)
  • Removed:
    • Reference to fiscal year ended January 31, 2025 and Form 10-K filed March 21, 2025 (older filing)
    • Phrase 'only charging customers for the resources they use' (older filing)
    • Detailed description of compute layer providing dedicated resources and storage layer creating unified data record (older filing)
    • Description of cloud services layer intelligently optimizing each use case's performance requirements with no administration (older filing)
    • Specification of 50 regional deployments around the world (older filing)
    • Net revenue retention rate of 125% and 126% as of October 31, 2025 and January 31, 2025 respectively (older filing)
    • Total customers of 12,621 as of October 31, 2025, increasing from 11,023 as of January 31, 2025 (older filing)
    • Statement that sales force also sells through resellers and distributors (older filing)
  • Reworded:
    • Reordering of layers description: newer filing describes storage layer first, then compute layer, then cloud services layer; older filing describes compute layer first, then storage layer, then cloud services layer
    • Compute layer description changed from 'provides dedicated resources to enable users to simultaneously access common data sets for many use cases with minimal latency' to include additional functionality about data preparation and creating AI-ready records
    • Storage layer description changed from 'ingests massive amounts and varieties of structured, semi-structured, and unstructured data to create a unified data record' to focus on ingesting massive amounts and varieties while data preparation occurs in compute layer
    • Cloud services layer description changed from 'intelligently optimizes each use case's performance requirements with no administration' to 'enables users to securely use AI within applications, tools, and processes'
  • Notes:
    • The older filing text appears truncated at the end, cutting off mid-sentence
    • The newer filing text also appears truncated at the end
    • Customer count and net revenue retention rate metrics reflect different reporting periods (April 30, 2026 vs October 31, 2025) making direct comparison contextual rather than comparable metrics

Risk Factors

  • Added:
    • In newer filing (2026-05-29): Reference to "changes in macroeconomic conditions" added as a reason revenue growth could slow or decline
    • In newer filing (2026-05-29): Reference to "supply chain restrictions" added in the description of risks related to highly-regulated entities
    • In newer filing (2026-05-29): Added language "including in the areas of data science, AI, and machine learning" after "acquire other businesses"
    • In newer filing (2026-05-29): Added phrase "or that require time and effort before reaching economies of scale" describing new product areas
  • Removed:
    • In older filing (2025-12-05): Nine-month revenue and net loss figures ($3.4 billion, $2.6 billion, $1.0 billion, $963.5 million for nine months ended October 31, 2025 and 2024) removed from newer filing
    • In older filing (2025-12-05): Accumulated deficit figures as of October 31, 2025 and January 31, 2025 ($9.0 billion and $7.3 billion) removed from newer filing
  • Reworded:
    • Revenue figures updated: Q3 2026 revenue $1.4 billion vs. $1.2 billion in Q3 2025 (older filing shows Q3 2025 as $1.2 billion, newer shows Q3 2026 as $1.4 billion); Q3 prior year $1.0 billion (newer) vs. $942.1 million (older)
    • Net loss figures updated: Q3 2026 net loss $295.6 million vs. Q3 2025 net loss $430.0 million (newer filing) compared to Q3 2025 net loss $291.6 million and Q3 2024 net loss $327.9 million (older filing)
    • Accumulated deficit updated: April 30, 2026 and January 31, 2026 figures ($10.1 billion and $9.5 billion) in newer filing vs. October 31, 2025 and January 31, 2025 figures ($9.0 billion and $7.3 billion) in older filing
    • Phrase 'or holidays' changed to ', or holidays' (minor punctuation change) in consumption fluctuation discussion
    • Language revised: 'We have also entered and may in the future enter into new customer consumption arrangements' (newer) vs. 'We have also entered into new customer consumption arrangements and' (older)
    • Phrase modified: 'whose adoption and usage are unpredictable or that require time and effort before reaching economies of scale' (newer) vs. 'whose adoption and usage are unpredictable' (older)
  • Notes:
    • The two filings are from different quarterly periods (Q2 2026 vs. Q3 2025), so numerical updates reflect different reporting periods and are expected changes rather than revisions to previously reported figures
    • The risk factor titles and overall structure remain substantially similar; changes are largely numerical updates and minor textual enhancements

AI-assisted comparison of two SEC filing sections. It describes wording and theme changes only, makes no materiality, legal, or investment judgement, and is not financial advice. Informational only — not financial advice.

Ask what changed in SNOW's latest 10-Q →

Insider activity (SEC Form 4)

0 open-market purchases and 174 open-market sales by insiders in the last 90 days.

  • Last 30 days0 buys · 16 sells ($69M) — 3 selling insiders
  • Last 90 days0 buys · 174 sells ($594M) — 9 selling insiders
  • Last 180 days0 buys · 208 sells ($644M) — 9 selling insiders

Activity heuristic: net selling (a transparent product heuristic from the counts above, not a prediction or advice)

Most recent open-market transaction: 2026-08-12. As of 2026-08-24.

View full insider trading history → View SEC Form 3/4/5 filings

Ask about SNOW's insider activity →

Only open-market purchases (SEC code P) and sales (code S) are counted here. Option exercises, vesting/awards, gifts, and shares withheld for taxes are excluded — they are compensation or mechanical, not open-market conviction. Sales may be planned and non-discretionary (e.g. a Rule 10b5-1 plan) and are not necessarily bearish; open-market buying is not a recommendation to buy. Informational only — not financial advice.

Congressional trading disclosures

U.S. House members publicly disclose their own, their spouse's, and dependent children's stock transactions under the STOCK Act. We hold 10 matched disclosures for SNOW from U.S. House Clerk Periodic Transaction Report filings.

Congressional trading disclosures →

Institutional ownership (13F)

5 institutional 13F filers reported holding SNOW as of 2026-03-31 (quarter-end position, filed within 45 days).

  • Distinct 13F filers 5
  • Reported shares held 53,084,285
  • Reported value $8,006,171,875

reported quarterly holdings change (2025-12-31 → 2026-03-31): 0 new, 1 increased, 4 decreased, 0 exited. Change counts cover only managers that filed 13F reports in BOTH quarters, derived between two quarter-end snapshots — not same-day trades; a single manager is never said to have "bought" or "sold".

Institutional holdings are quarter-end long positions reported on SEC Form 13F-HR, filed up to 45 days after the quarter ends — they are delayed, are not real-time trades, exclude short positions and most non-US securities, and are not investment advice. Any increase/decrease is a reported change between two quarterly snapshots, not a same-day purchase or sale. These are quarter-end snapshots from the 13F filings on SEC EDGAR, filed within 45 days — not real-time, and any change is a difference between two quarterly reports, not a same-day trade. Informational only — not financial advice.

Ask about SNOW's institutional holders →

Short interest (FINRA)

SNOW had 18,948,362 shares of reported short interest as of the 2026-07-31 FINRA settlement date (delayed, bi-monthly; not real-time).

SNOW had 5.47% of its shares outstanding sold short as of the 2026-07-31 FINRA settlement date (percent of FLOAT would be higher — float is not disclosed in the source). FINRA reported 3.89 days to cover at the same settlement.

  • Reported short interest (shares) 18,948,362
  • Short interest (% of shares outstanding) 5.47%
  • Prior settlement (shares) 21,703,645
  • Reported change -12.7%
  • Days to cover (reported) 3.89

Reported to FINRA as of the 2026-07-31 settlement date. Short interest is reported to FINRA and published on a delayed, bi-monthly schedule (as of a settlement date, disseminated roughly eight business days later) — it is NOT real-time, does not cover every venue or all US trading, and is not a short-squeeze prediction or investment advice. Days-to-cover is the value FINRA reports; percent of float is not shown because the source file carries no share-count denominator — where a percent appears it is of shares OUTSTANDING, the larger base, and is therefore a floor on percent of float. Informational only — not financial advice.

Ask about SNOW's short interest →

Competitors & peers

AI-enriched competitor set. Linked names are companies covered by stocks-llm; other named peers are shown for reference only.

Not quite? Describe exactly what you want →

Compare SNOW vs…

Snowflake Inc. is found in…

SNOW shows up in…

Frequently asked questions

What does Snowflake Inc. (SNOW) do?

Snowflake operates an AI Data Cloud platform that enables organizations to consolidate, analyze, and share data across a cloud-native architecture with independently scalable storage, compute, and cloud services layers. The platform addresses data silos and governance challenges by allowing customers to unify data from multiple sources, apply AI and analytics, and securely share data products without copying underlying data.

What sector is Snowflake Inc. (SNOW) in?

Snowflake Inc. (SNOW) is classified in the Information Technology sector. Its industry is Cloud Data Platform. It trades on NYSE.

Who are Snowflake Inc.'s (SNOW) competitors?

Notable peers of Snowflake Inc. (SNOW) include Amazon Web Services, Microsoft Azure, Google Cloud Platform, Databricks and Oracle. This peer set is informational only — not financial advice.

Has there been recent Congressional stock trading in SNOW?

Yes — we hold 10 matched STOCK Act disclosures for SNOW from U.S. House Clerk Periodic Transaction Report filings. These are legally-required disclosures (often filed 30–45 days after the trade), may belong to a U.S. House member, their spouse, or a dependent child, and are not an indicator of company performance or investment advice.

Is Snowflake Inc. (SNOW) overbought or oversold right now?

Snowflake Inc. (SNOW) is currently neither overbought nor oversold — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 69, in the neutral middle (as of 2026-08-21). RSI describes recent price momentum, not a forecast — informational only, not financial advice.

Where does stocks-llm's data on SNOW come from?

Fundamentals and prices come from market data, as of 2026-08-24; company filings and profile facts come from SEC EDGAR. All figures are delayed daily-close data shown with their as-of date — informational only, not financial advice.

Fundamentals: market data, as of 2026-08-24. Filings: SEC EDGAR. Prices are delayed daily-close data.

Last updated 2026-08-21.

Informational only — NOT financial advice. All figures are delayed daily-close data from SEC EDGAR & market data, shown with their as-of date.

Research stocks in your own words.

Informational only — NOT financial advice.

ScreenersBlogPrivacyiOS app