Elliott wave 4 pullbacks (UK)

A technical stock screen computed nightly from daily-close price history (market data). Selection is deterministic — a company appears only when its stored indicator meets the screen's rule; nothing is estimated.

32 companies in the catalog currently match this technical screen. Leading the list, Bunzl (BNZL.L) is its swings can be read as a five-part sequence now in leg 4, a pullback against its direction — the reading fails if price closes below £26.14; the only labelling that fits.

#	Company	Sector	Price	Signal
1	Bunzl (BNZL.L)	—	£28.06	its swings can be read as a five-part sequence now in leg 4, a pullback against its direction — the reading fails if price closes below £26.14; the only labelling that fits
2	Great Portland Estates (GPE.L)	—	£3.53	its swings can be read as a five-part sequence now in leg 4, a pullback against its direction — the reading fails if price closes below £3.25; the only labelling that fits
3	Associated British Foods (ABF.L)	—	£20.73	its swings can be read as a five-part sequence now in leg 4, a pullback against its direction — the reading fails if price closes below £20.27; one of several labellings that fit
4	Beazley (BEZ.L)	—	£12.93	its swings can be read as a five-part sequence now in leg 4, a pullback against its direction — the reading fails if price closes below £8.47; one of several labellings that fit
5	British Land (BLND.L)	—	£4.36	its swings can be read as a five-part sequence now in leg 4, a pullback against its direction — the reading fails if price closes below £4.29; one of several labellings that fit
6	Man Group (EMG.L)	—	£3.13	its swings can be read as a five-part sequence now in leg 4, a pullback against its direction — the reading fails if price closes below £3.06; one of several labellings that fit
7	Derwent London (DLN.L)	—	£20.68	its swings can be read as a five-part sequence now in leg 4, a pullback against its direction — the reading fails if price closes below £17.85; one of several labellings that fit
8	Energean (ENOG.L)	—	£7.58	its swings can be read as a five-part sequence now in leg 4, a pullback against its direction — the reading fails if price closes below £7.46; one of several labellings that fit
9	Funding Circle (FCH.L)	—	£2.27	its swings can be read as a five-part sequence now in leg 4, a pullback against its direction — the reading fails if price closes below £1.48; one of several labellings that fit
10	Close Brothers Group (CBG.L)	—	£4.21	its swings can be read as a five-part sequence now in leg 4, a pullback against its direction — the reading fails if price closes above £4.38; one of several labellings that fit
11	3i Infrastructure (3IN.L)	—	£3.83	its swings can be read as a five-part sequence now in leg 4, a pullback against its direction — the reading fails if price closes below £3.63; one of several labellings that fit
12	Alfa Financial Software (ALFA.L)	—	£1.62	its swings can be read as a five-part sequence now in leg 4, a pullback against its direction — the reading fails if price closes below £1.56; one of several labellings that fit
13	Ceres Power (CWR.L)	—	£4.34	its swings can be read as a five-part sequence now in leg 4, a pullback against its direction — the reading fails if price closes above £5.37; one of several labellings that fit
14	Hilton Food Group (HFG.L)	—	£6.15	its swings can be read as a five-part sequence now in leg 4, a pullback against its direction — the reading fails if price closes below £5.46; one of several labellings that fit
15	Halma plc (HLMA.L)	—	£37.18	its swings can be read as a five-part sequence now in leg 4, a pullback against its direction — the reading fails if price closes above £38.08; one of several labellings that fit
16	Intertek (ITRK.L)	—	£58.40	its swings can be read as a five-part sequence now in leg 4, a pullback against its direction — the reading fails if price closes below £56.70; one of several labellings that fit
17	Jupiter Fund Management (JUP.L)	—	£1.61	its swings can be read as a five-part sequence now in leg 4, a pullback against its direction — the reading fails if price closes above £1.67; one of several labellings that fit
18	Land Securities (LAND.L)	—	£7.02	its swings can be read as a five-part sequence now in leg 4, a pullback against its direction — the reading fails if price closes below £6.79; one of several labellings that fit
19	LondonMetric Property (LMP.L)	—	£1.93	its swings can be read as a five-part sequence now in leg 4, a pullback against its direction — the reading fails if price closes below £1.90; one of several labellings that fit
20	M&G (MNG.L)	—	£3.50	its swings can be read as a five-part sequence now in leg 4, a pullback against its direction — the reading fails if price closes below £3.25; one of several labellings that fit
21	Paragon Banking Group (PAG.L)	—	£8.20	its swings can be read as a five-part sequence now in leg 4, a pullback against its direction — the reading fails if price closes below £7.96; one of several labellings that fit
22	Rightmove (RMV.L)	—	£4.85	its swings can be read as a five-part sequence now in leg 4, a pullback against its direction — the reading fails if price closes below £4.58; one of several labellings that fit
23	Raspberry Pi Holdings (RPI.L)	—	£6.75	its swings can be read as a five-part sequence now in leg 4, a pullback against its direction — the reading fails if price closes above £7.20; one of several labellings that fit
24	Rentokil Initial (RTO.L)	—	£3.60	its swings can be read as a five-part sequence now in leg 4, a pullback against its direction — the reading fails if price closes above £4.22; one of several labellings that fit
25	Spire Healthcare (SPI.L)	—	£2.30	its swings can be read as a five-part sequence now in leg 4, a pullback against its direction — the reading fails if price closes below £2.29; one of several labellings that fit

Ask about these stocks in plain English →

Today's movers → · Browse all stocks → · Compare BNZL.L vs GPE.L →

What is an Elliott wave 4 pullback?

Elliott wave analysis reads a chart as a repeating shape: five legs in the direction of the larger trend (an "impulse"), then three legs against it (an "A-B-C correction"). We label the sequence of swing highs and lows a stock has actually printed and keep only labellings that survive the three rules the method treats as inviolable — wave 2 never gives back all of wave 1, wave 3 is never the shortest of waves 1, 3 and 5, and wave 4 never trades back into wave 1's range. Every count we show carries the price that would break it. Wave 4 is the fourth leg — a pullback that runs AGAINST the direction of the count. It is the one leg with a hard price boundary: it may not trade back into the range wave 1 covered, and that boundary is the level quoted on each row.

How do I read the Elliott wave 4 pullbacks (UK) screen?

This screen lists companies whose swings can be labelled as a five-part sequence currently in its fourth leg — a counter-trend pullback on that reading — strongest labellings first. Because a wave 4 is expected to trade back through the wave-3 extreme, the level shown is wave 1's boundary rather than the most recent turn. This describes swings the stock has already printed, not what comes next. Elliott labelling is genuinely subjective — competent chartists routinely label the same chart differently, and more than one labelling usually survives the rules — so each row names the level at which its reading fails rather than asserting a target.

New to this? What is Corrective wave (the A-B-C)? →

Data: daily-close price history, recomputed nightly. Every figure is shown with its as-of date on the company page; a company without enough price history for this indicator is excluded, never estimated.

1 covered company was not evaluated for this screen because its price series ends on or before 2026-08-10 (DOM.L), at least 3 trading sessions behind the 2026-08-13 session the rest of the catalog carries. A technical signal is a claim about the present, so it is not asserted from a series that stops before it. That company keeps the readings it has on its own page, with the as-of date it was computed from. 1 covered company was not evaluated for this screen (MEGP.L) because our price history for this company shows an unadjusted split or scale break. Every indicator read from such a series is an artifact of that break rather than a fact about the company, so none of them is asserted here — which is why the same company has no 1-year return on its own page either.

Last updated 2026-08-11 — this screen recomputes nightly from daily-close prices, so its members change over time.

Informational only — NOT financial advice. Technical indicators describe past price behavior; they are not predictions. All figures are delayed daily-close data.