LIGHTBRIDGE CORP (LTBR)
Energy · nuclear energy technology · NASDAQ
Lightbridge is developing proprietary, high-performance metallic nuclear fuel designed to increase the power output and safety of existing commercial nuclear power plants.
What LIGHTBRIDGE CORP does
Lightbridge Corporation is an advanced nuclear fuel technology company focused on developing its proprietary, metallic, high-burnup nuclear fuel design known as Lightbridge Fuel™. The company conducts research and development through collaborations with the U.S. Department of Energy and Idaho National Laboratory, targeting applications for existing commercial nuclear reactors to enhance power output and safety. Currently in the development stage, the company is also working on conceptual designs for fuel fabrication facilities.
Recent developments
In mid-2026, the company successfully completed the first irradiation of fuel material samples at the Idaho National Laboratory, with post-irradiation examination expected later in the year. The company also signed a memorandum of understanding with Quadrant Nuclear Industries for a long-term HALEU supply framework and partnered with Studsvik Scandpower to model the Lightbridge Fuel™ design in core management software.
From LIGHTBRIDGE CORP's filing of 2026-08-06.
Themes: advanced nuclear fuel, nuclear power uprates, AI infrastructure / electricity demand, HALEU fuel supply, nuclear innovation
Fundamentals
- Price$5.23 as of 2026-10-20 close
- Market cap$196M as of 2026-07-28 (share count; price 2026-10-20)
- 1-year return-79.9% 2025-10-20 close $26.08 → 2026-10-20 close $5.23
- P/En/a negative earnings
- ROE-9.6% FY2025, SEC XBRL
- ROICn/a No figure: its pre-tax income was zero or negative, so there is no tax rate to apply.
- Debt / equityn/a No figure: its filing tags none of the debt lines we read, which is not evidence of zero debt.
- Beta2.79 as of 2026-09-03
- Last reported earnings2026-08-05 SEC EDGAR Form 8-K (Item 2.02)
How LTBR compares in its sector
- return on equitybottom 25% 143 covered Energy peers, as of 2026-09-03
Position among covered Energy companies that report each metric (minimum 5 peers). A relative position within our covered catalog — not a valuation, quality, or investment judgment. A higher percentile is simply a higher value (for P/E, more expensive on earnings — never "better"). Informational only.
Quarterly results
| Quarter | Revenue | Operating income | Net income | Diluted EPS | Operating cash flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 FY2026 2026-06-30 | $0 | -$8M | -$6M | -$0.18 | -$4M† |
| Q1 FY2026 2026-03-31 | $0 | -$8M | -$6M | -$0.20 | -$5M |
| Q4 FY2025 2025-12-31 | — | -$9M† | -$7M† | — | -$6M† |
| Q3 FY2025 2025-09-30 | — | -$5M | -$4M | -$0.16 | -$3M† |
| Q2 FY2025 2025-06-30 | $0 | -$4M | -$4M | -$0.16 | -$2M† |
| Q1 FY2025 2025-03-31 | $0 | -$5M | -$5M | -$0.24 | -$3M |
| Q4 FY2024 2024-12-31 | — | -$4M† | -$4M† | -$0.24† | -$4M† |
| Q3 FY2024 2024-09-30 | $0 | -$3M | -$3M | -$0.19 | -$2M† |
† Not filed as a discrete quarter: derived from the company's own year-to-date figures (for example the fourth quarter as the fiscal year minus the first nine months). A derived per-share figure is approximate, because the share count moves within the year.
Balance sheet at 2026-06-30
- Cash and equivalents$192M
- Total debtnot shown the filing tags none of the debt lines we read — not evidence of zero debt
From the company's own SEC 10-Q and 10-K filings (XBRL), re-read every week. Figures in US dollars as filed; informational only — not financial advice.
How LIGHTBRIDGE CORP looks technically
LIGHTBRIDGE CORP (LTBR) is trading 50.5% below its 200-day average, the long-term trend line — a long-term downtrend. Its 50-day average crossed below its 200-day average about 180 trading days ago — a "death cross", a bearish long-term signal. A strong downtrend is in place — ADX, a 0–100 trend-strength gauge, is 27, with sellers in control. Momentum is neutral — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 34, neither overbought (above 70) nor oversold (below 30). MACD, a trend-momentum gauge, turned bearish about 7 trading days ago (its momentum flipped negative). It made a new 20-day low about 5 trading days ago. It is 81.6% below its highest point of the past year.
Trend
8
| Distance from the 200-day | it is trading 50.5% below its 200-day average, the long-term trend line — a long-term downtrend | -50.5% |
|---|---|---|
| 50-day moving average | its average price over the last 50 trading days — a short-term trend line — is $7.01 | $7.01 |
| 200-day moving average | its average price over the last 200 trading days — the long-term trend line — is $10.57 | $10.57 |
| Swing structure | each recent peak has been lower than the one before it and each dip deeper — the pattern chart-watchers call a downtrend, which describes where price has already been and not where it goes next | lower highs and lower lows |
| Last swing turn | its last significant turn was a swing high 29 calendar days ago — the swings before that are what the structure reading is measured on | 29 sessions |
| Wave structure | its recent swings can be read as a five-part downward sequence — what Elliott-wave chartists call an impulse — now in leg 5 of five; the labelling fails if price closes above 7.04. It is the only labelling that fits, and it describes the swings already printed, not what comes next. | possible downward five-wave sequence, in wave 5 |
| Since the 50/200 cross | its 50-day average crossed below its 200-day average about 180 trading days ago — a "death cross", a bearish long-term signal | 180 sessions |
| Trend strength (14-day ADX) | a strong downtrend is in place — ADX, a 0–100 trend-strength gauge, is 27, with sellers in control | 27.2 |
Momentum
3
| 14-day RSI | momentum is neutral — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 34, neither overbought (above 70) nor oversold (below 30) | 33.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Position in its 14-day range | it is trading near the bottom of its 14-day range ($4.87 to $7.04) — its "stochastic" reading is 17 out of 100, where 0 would mean closing exactly at the 14-session low and 100 exactly at the high. This measures WHERE the price sits inside its recent range, which is a different question from the RSI beside it: RSI is a momentum gauge, measuring how FAST the price has been moving, so a stock can drift quietly to the bottom of its range with an ordinary RSI, or fall sharply and still sit in the middle. It has been slipping within that range over the last few sessions. | 16.6 |
| Since the MACD crossed zero | MACD, a trend-momentum gauge, turned bearish about 7 trading days ago (its momentum flipped negative) | 7 sessions |
Range
12
| 52-week high | its highest closing price over the past year (about 252 trading days) was $28.44 | $28.44 |
|---|---|---|
| From the 52-week high | it is 81.6% below its 52-week high (its highest price of the past year) | -81.6% |
| Above the 52-week low | it is 7.4% above its 52-week low (its lowest price of the past year) | +7.4% |
| Below the 52-week high | it is 81.6% below its highest point of the past year | 81.6% |
| Since a 20-day breakout | it made a new 20-day low about 5 trading days ago | 5 sessions |
| Since a 55-day breakout | it made a new 55-day low about 5 trading days ago | 5 sessions |
| All-time high | its highest closing price on record is $1584.00 (set on 2006-01-31) | $1584.00 |
| Given back of the 52-week move | over the past year its closes ranged ($5.07 to $27.72), and it has recovered essentially none of its fall from last year’s high — 1% of it. Chart-watchers call 61.8%-65% given back the "golden pocket" — for this company that is $19.07 to $19.79. It is watched widely enough that orders cluster there, which is the honest reason it matters; it is not a forecast. | 0.7% |
| From the all-time high | it is 99.7% below its all-time high | -99.7% |
| Nearest price level | it is trading 31.6% below a resistance level at $6.88 — a price it turned at twice since 2025-04-21, most recently on 2026-07-17. Since 2024-10-21 it has 0 such levels below the current price and 17 above. Levels like these describe where the price has reversed or paused before; they are not a forecast of where it will go. | +31.6% |
| All-time low | its lowest closing price on record is $1.71 (set on 2020-04-07) | $1.71 |
| Above the all-time low | it is 205.8% above its all-time low | +205.8% |
Volatility
5
| Band width vs its own 6 months | day-to-day price swings are unusually wide versus its own recent history (wider than about 83% of the past ~6 months) | 83rd percentile |
|---|---|---|
| Typical daily range | in a typical session it travels about $0.3662 between its high and its low — about 7.0% of its price. That is its "average true range" over the last 14 sessions, which also counts the distance from the previous close, so a day that opens well away from yesterday counts as the large move it was | $0.3662 |
| Bollinger bands (20-day, ±2σ) | most of its recent trading has stayed between about $4.94 and $7.20 — the "Bollinger bands", a range drawn two standard deviations either side of its 20-day average price, which widens when the stock gets more volatile and narrows when it settles | $4.94 – $6.07 – $7.20 |
| Typical daily range (% of price) | its price moves about 7.0% in a typical session — more volatile than most companies we cover. This is the average gap between a session's high and low over the last 14 sessions, counting overnight moves, expressed against the current price so it can be compared with companies trading at any price | 7.0% |
| Stretch from the 200-day average | it is trading 14.6 daily ranges below its 200-day average price (50.5% below it in plain percentage terms) — a way of asking how far it has stretched from its own average in units of how far it normally moves in a day, so a calm company and a jumpy one can be compared on the same scale | 14.6 daily ranges below its 200-day average |
Volume
1
| Volume vs its 30-day average | trading volume is about normal versus its 30-day average | 0.66× |
|---|
Candlestick patterns
1
| Since a hammer | 1 session ago, after a stretch of decline, it sold off hard during the session and then closed back near its high — a "hammer", the long lower wick showing the drop was bought back before the close | 1 session ago |
|---|
Price gaps
3
| Gap at the open | it opened on 2026-10-20 2.0% below the previous session's close — an overnight gap, the part of the move that happened while the market was shut, and traded back through that level before the close | -2.0% |
|---|---|---|
| Open gap | it gapped 2.1% below the previous close 4 sessions ago and has not traded back through the level it left behind at 5.64 — an "unfilled gap", which describes a price range no trade has since crossed and is not a forecast that it will be crossed | -2.1% |
| Gap filled | a 2.0% gap down opened on 2026-10-20 has been "filled" today — price traded back through the level the gap left behind, and it closed again during the very session that opened it | today |
Price streaks
1
| Closing streak | it closed lower in its latest session, after a session that did not close lower — a single down day rather than a run | 1 session down |
|---|
Relative strength
4
| vs market, 1 month | over the past 1 month this stock lagged the market by 20.8 percentage points (the stock lost 19.8% while the market gained 1.0%) | -20.8% |
|---|---|---|
| vs market, 3 months | over the past 3 months this stock lagged the market by 33.4 percentage points (the stock lost 29.8% while the market gained 3.6%) | -33.4% |
| vs market, 6 months | over the past 6 months this stock lagged the market by 68.1 percentage points (the stock lost 59.6% while the market gained 8.5%) | -68.1% |
| vs market, 12 months | over the past 12 months this stock lagged the market by 94.5 percentage points (the stock lost 79.9% while the market gained 14.6%) | -94.5% |
Signal agreement
2
| Bullish technical signals | 1 of the 9 technical signals we can compute for it is currently in a bullish state: near the bottom of its 14-day range (oversold) — these describe past price behaviour, not a forecast | 1 of 9 |
|---|---|---|
| Bearish technical signals | 6 of the 9 technical signals we can compute for it are currently in a bearish state: a "death cross" — its 50-day average is below its 200-day, trading below its 200-day average, MACD momentum is negative, a strong downtrend, with sellers in control, lagging the market over 6 months, trading below the Ichimoku cloud — these describe past price behaviour, not a forecast | 6 of 9 |
Trend (Ichimoku cloud)
1
| Vs the Ichimoku cloud | trading 33% below the Ichimoku cloud — a band drawn from where its own highs and lows sat up to 2026-09-14 and projected forward over today's price, the side traders read as an established downtrend, with the band above acting as the level that would have to be cleared. The band itself is moderate, spanning 7.4% of the share price. | -32.6% |
|---|
Volume-weighted price
1
| Vs this year’s average price paid | the price is 51% below the average price paid so far this year, so the typical buyer over that stretch is under water. That average is $10.77 — a volume-weighted average of daily closes over 201 sessions, not a true tick-by-tick VWAP. | -51.4% |
|---|
Price levels it has turned at before
LTBR last closed at $5.23 on 2026-10-20. Since 2024-10-21 it has turned at 0 prices below its last close and 17 above; the 3 nearest above are listed, nearest first.
| Level | Side | Distance | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| $6.88 | Resistance | 31.6% above the last close | turned there twice · 2025-04-21 to 2026-07-17 |
| $7.06 | Resistance | 35.0% above the last close | turned there three times · 2025-01-06 to 2026-10-06 |
| $7.26 | Resistance | 38.9% above the last close | turned there twice · 2024-11-22 to 2026-09-01 |
A level is a price this company reversed or paused at more than once — they describe past behaviour, not a forecast of where the price will go.
Wave structure
Its recent swings can be read as a five-part downward sequence — what Elliott-wave chartists call an impulse — now in leg 5 of five.
This labelling fails — stops being a possible reading at all — if it closes above $7.04.
It is the only labelling that fits these swings, though its proportions are not the textbook ones. It was chosen from 3 labellings that survived the rules, counting shorter readings of the same bars.
On past moves of this shape the leg has usually ended somewhere between $4.73 and $6.16 — that is where it has tended to end if the count holds, not a forecast of where the price goes.
This reading has stood for 17 trading days, since 2026-09-28.
Read from daily closes as of 2026-10-20.
An Elliott-wave count describes the swings already printed and the level that would disprove it. It is not a forecast, a target, or advice.
Screens: Trading below the 200-day moving average · Trading below the 50-day moving average · Pulled back from the 12-month high · lagging the market · Most volatile (6%+ typical daily range) · Stretched far below its 200-day average (6+ daily ranges) | Learn: moving average · golden cross · adx · rsi · macd · breakout · fifty two week high low
Based on daily closing prices as of 2026-10-20. Describes past price behavior only — informational, not financial advice.
Key risks (from latest filing)
["Significant capital requirements and dependence on future equity financings to continue research and development.","Inherent uncertainties and risks associated with the early-stage development and commercialization of new nuclear fuel technology.","Regulatory and technical risks involved in securing DOE collaboration and future facility licensure."]
What changed in the latest 10-Q
AI-assisted comparison of LTBR's 10-Q filed 2026-08-06 against the prior one filed 2026-04-30.
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
- Reworded:
- In the newer filing (filed 2026-08-06), the text reads 'future events , including' (with a space before the comma). In the older filing (filed 2026-04-30), the text reads 'future event s, including' (with a space between 'event' and 's').
- Notes:
- The provided excerpts are very brief and end mid-sentence ('Part II,'), so only the visible portion could be compared.
Risk Factors
- Added:
- Newer filing adds a new subsection 'Development of a Pilot-Scale Facility and Future Lightbridge Expandable Fuel Facility' describing evaluation of a pilot-scale fuel fabrication capability to support future manufacture of LTAs.
- Newer filing adds disclosure that the Company may apply to governmental agency programs offering funding, regulatory flexibility, or other support, and that such programs may require significant capital investment and could materially increase R&D activities, capital expenditures, manufacturing capabilities and staffing.
- Newer filing adds disclosure that the Company recently submitted an application to the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) seeking authorization and collaboration through the Nuclear Energy Launch Pad program relating to a pilot-scale fuel fabrication capability.
- Newer filing adds disclosure that the requested authorization, if obtained and pursued, could enable earlier fabrication and testing of LTAs and accelerate the Company's commercialization timeline.
- Newer filing adds disclosure that construction of a pilot-scale facility could commence as early as 2027, versus the older filing's disclosure that construction of a LEFF might commence as early as late 2027.
- Newer filing adds a new subsection 'Reconstitution of the Nuclear Utility Fuel Advisory Board' disclosing that in June 2026 the Company launched a reconstituted Nuclear Utility Fuel Advisory Board to provide input from utility industry representatives regarding fuel development priorities, licensing considerations, deployment strategies, operational requirements, and commercialization planning.
- Newer filing adds disclosure that the advisory board serves in an advisory capacity only and does not constitute a commitment by any participant to purchase, license, deploy, or otherwise utilize the Company's fuel technology.
- Newer filing adds disclosure that in June 2026, the Company entered into Modification No. 5 to CRADA Project Task Statement (PTS) No.1 with BEA to increase the total estimated reimbursable cost by approximately $1.1 million, bringing the total estimated cost for CRADA PTS No.1 to $5.4 million.
- Newer filing adds dated cumulative cost disclosures as of June 30, 2026: aggregate $25.2 million expected to be paid to BEA; $7.1 million cumulatively expensed; $18.1 million aggregate funding commitment remaining.
- Newer filing references 'Batelle Energy Alliance, LLC (BEA)' in the new 'Updates to Idaho National Laboratory Agreements' subsection heading.
- Newer filing adds disclosure that it continues to perform work under its SPPA and CRADA with BEA, as previously described in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025.
- Newer filing adds disclosure that it periodically updates project scopes, schedules and cost estimates using a rolling wave planning approach on the released scopes of work.
- Newer filing adds a new subsection 'Master Services Agreement with Amentum Technology Inc.' disclosing that in December 2025 the Company entered into an MSA with Amentum Technology Inc., and that in June 2026 the C[ompany...] (text truncated).
- Removed:
- Older filing contained an 'Overview of Our Business and Recent Developments Regarding Lightbridge Fuel' section with a business overview describing development of next generation nuclear fuel, potential benefits, reactor types, and patent validation in key countries.
- Older filing contained a subsection 'Memorandum of Understanding with Oklo, Inc.' disclosing a January 2025 MOU with Oklo, Inc., including potential collaboration areas such as preliminary evaluation of co-locating a Lightbridge commercial-scale fuel fabrication facility with Oklo's proposed commercial fuel fabrication facility.
- Reworded:
- Newer filing changes the initial construction timing disclosure from 'might commence as early as late 2027' (older) to 'could commence as early as 2027' (newer).
- Newer filing changes the description from 'working on a conceptual design' for a LEFF (older) to 'developing a conceptual design' for a LEFF (newer).
- Newer filing changes dated cumulative cost disclosures: older as of March 31, 2026 expected to pay an aggregate $19.5 million, with $6.0 million expensed and $13.5 million remaining; newer as of June 30, 2026 expected to pay an aggregate $25.2 million, with $7.1 million expensed and $18.1 million remaining.
- Newer filing reorders and restructures the risk factor section, moving the LEFF/pilot facility discussion before the INL agreements discussion and changing the heading from 'Overview of Our Business and Recent Developments Regarding Lightbridge Fuel' to targeted subsections.
- Newer filing removes language stating 'In April 2026, the Company entered into SPPA PTS No. 6 with BEA, with an estimated total cost of approximately $4.6 million' from the Total Cumulative Estimated Costs paragraph, while still disclosing the SPPA PTS No. 6 details elsewhere in the newer filing.
- Newer filing removes the statement 'Actual expenditures may differ from this amount based on the scope and timing of work performed through the issuance of additional PTSs to BEA' immediately following the SPPA PTS No. 6 cost disclosure in the older filing, and places a similar statement at the end of the updated Total Cumulative Estimated Costs paragraph.
- Notes:
- The newer filing text is truncated at the end of the 'Master Services Agreement with Amentum Technology Inc.' subsection, so only the beginning of that subsection could be assessed.
- The older filing text is truncated at the beginning of the 'Memorandum of Understanding with Oklo, Inc.' subsection, so only part of that subsection could be assessed.
- This comparison is based solely on the provided excerpts of the Risk Factors sections and filing metadata; no other sections or filings were reviewed.
AI-assisted comparison of two SEC filing sections. It describes wording and theme changes only, makes no materiality, legal, or investment judgement, and is not financial advice. Informational only — not financial advice.
Insider activity (SEC Form 4)
0 open-market purchases and 3 open-market sales by insiders in the last 90 days, of which we have read Form 4 filings through 2026-10-16. The 5 days since 2026-10-16 have not been checked yet.
- Last 30 days · read to 2026-10-160 buys · 1 sell ($7020) — 1 selling insider
- Last 90 days · read to 2026-10-160 buys · 3 sells ($147197) — 3 selling insiders
- Last 180 days · read to 2026-10-160 buys · 6 sells ($178879) — 3 selling insiders
Activity heuristic: net selling (a transparent product heuristic from the counts above, not a prediction or advice)
Most recent open-market transaction: 2026-10-01. Based on Form 4 filings read through 2026-10-16; anything filed since is not yet included.
View full insider trading history → View SEC Form 3/4/5 filingsAsk about LTBR's insider activity →
Only open-market purchases (SEC code P) and sales (code S) are counted here. Option exercises, vesting/awards, gifts, and shares withheld for taxes are excluded — they are compensation or mechanical, not open-market conviction. Sales may be planned and non-discretionary (e.g. a Rule 10b5-1 plan) and are not necessarily bearish; open-market buying is not a recommendation to buy. Informational only — not financial advice.
Institutional ownership (13F)
5 institutional 13F filers reported holding LTBR as of 2026-06-30 (quarter-end position, filed within 45 days).
- Distinct 13F filers 5
- Reported shares held 6,154,859
- Reported value $54,101,207
reported quarterly holdings change (2026-03-31 → 2026-06-30): 0 new, 3 increased, 2 decreased, 0 exited. Change counts cover only managers that filed 13F reports in BOTH quarters, derived between two quarter-end snapshots — not same-day trades; a single manager is never said to have "bought" or "sold".
Institutional holdings are quarter-end long positions reported on SEC Form 13F-HR, filed up to 45 days after the quarter ends — they are delayed, are not real-time trades, exclude short positions and most non-US securities, and are not investment advice. Any increase/decrease is a reported change between two quarterly snapshots, not a same-day purchase or sale. These are quarter-end snapshots from the 13F filings on SEC EDGAR, filed within 45 days — not real-time, and any change is a difference between two quarterly reports, not a same-day trade. Informational only — not financial advice.
Ask about LTBR's institutional holders → See what each manager we track holds →
Short interest (FINRA)
LTBR had 4,107,390 shares of reported short interest as of the 2026-09-30 FINRA settlement date (delayed, bi-monthly; not real-time).
LTBR had 11.0% of its shares outstanding sold short as of the 2026-09-30 FINRA settlement date (percent of FLOAT would be higher — float is not disclosed in the source). FINRA reported 3.99 days to cover at the same settlement.
- Reported short interest (shares) 4,107,390
- Short interest (% of shares outstanding) 11.0%
- Prior settlement (shares) 4,895,179
- Reported change -16.09%
- Days to cover (reported) 3.99
Reported to FINRA as of the 2026-09-30 settlement date. Short interest is reported to FINRA and published on a delayed, bi-monthly schedule (as of a settlement date, disseminated roughly eight business days later) — it is NOT real-time, does not cover every venue or all US trading, and is not a short-squeeze prediction or investment advice. Days-to-cover is the value FINRA reports; percent of float is not shown because the source file carries no share-count denominator — where a percent appears it is of shares OUTSTANDING, the larger base, and is therefore a floor on percent of float. Informational only — not financial advice.
Competitors & peers
- Framatome
- Westinghouse Electric Company
- General Electric (GE)
- BWX Technologies (BWXT)
- Orano
AI-enriched competitor set. Linked names are companies covered by stocks-llm; other named peers are shown for reference only.
Compare LTBR vs…
Frequently asked questions
What does LIGHTBRIDGE CORP (LTBR) do?
Lightbridge Corporation is an advanced nuclear fuel technology company focused on developing its proprietary, metallic, high-burnup nuclear fuel design known as Lightbridge Fuel™. The company conducts research and development through collaborations with the U.S. Department of Energy and Idaho National Laboratory, targeting applications for existing commercial nuclear reactors to enhance power output and safety.
What sector is LIGHTBRIDGE CORP (LTBR) in?
LIGHTBRIDGE CORP (LTBR) is classified in the Energy sector. Its industry is nuclear energy technology. It trades on NASDAQ.
Who are LIGHTBRIDGE CORP's (LTBR) competitors?
Notable peers of LIGHTBRIDGE CORP (LTBR) include Framatome, Westinghouse Electric Company, General Electric, BWX Technologies and Orano. This peer set is informational only — not financial advice.
Is LIGHTBRIDGE CORP (LTBR) overbought or oversold right now?
LIGHTBRIDGE CORP (LTBR) is currently neither overbought nor oversold — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 34, in the neutral middle (as of 2026-10-20). RSI describes recent price momentum, not a forecast — informational only, not financial advice.
Where does stocks-llm's data on LTBR come from?
Fundamentals come from SEC XBRL company filings for the figures marked with a fiscal year, and market data, as of 2026-09-03 for the rest; prices are market data, as of 2026-09-03; company filings and profile facts come from SEC EDGAR. All figures are delayed daily-close data shown with their as-of date — informational only, not financial advice.
Fundamentals: SEC XBRL company filings for the figures marked with a fiscal year, and market data, as of 2026-09-03 for the rest. Filings: SEC EDGAR. Prices are delayed daily-close data.
Last updated 2026-10-20.
Informational only — NOT financial advice. All figures are delayed daily-close data from SEC EDGAR & market data, shown with their as-of date.