Skip to content

SABRE CORP (SABR)

Consumer Discretionary · Travel Technology · NASDAQ

Sabre is an AI-native travel technology leader powering global travel distribution and airline operations through its comprehensive data cloud and marketplace platform.

What SABRE CORP does

Sabre is an AI-native travel technology provider that operates a global travel marketplace and provides airline technology solutions. The company empowers airlines, travel agencies, and partners to retail, distribute, and fulfill travel services through its data-driven software platform. Following the 2025 divestiture of its hospitality business, Sabre now operates as a unified entity focused on its Sabre Mosaic marketplace and airline IT systems.

Themes: travel distribution, airline technology / SaaS, AI-native enterprise software, travel marketplace

Fundamentals

  • Price$1.52 as of 2026-10-21 close
  • Market cap$613M as of 2026-07-30 (share count; price 2026-10-21)
  • 1-year return-18.7% 2025-10-21 close $1.87 → 2026-10-21 close $1.52
  • P/En/a not reported by our data source
  • Net margin+18.9% FY2025, SEC XBRL
  • ROICn/a No figure: its pre-tax income was zero or negative, so there is no tax rate to apply.
  • Debt / equityn/a No figure: its stockholders' equity is zero or negative, where the ratio means nothing.
  • Revenue growth (YoY)+0.9% FY2025, SEC XBRL
  • Revenue CAGR (3y)+3.0% SEC XBRL
  • Beta1.94 as of 2026-09-02
  • Last reported earnings2026-08-06 SEC EDGAR Form 8-K (Item 2.02)

Dividend: does not currently pay a dividend.

Ask why SABR looks like this →

How SABR compares in its sector

  • net profit margintop 10% 315 covered Consumer Discretionary peers, as of 2026-09-02
  • operating marginmiddle range 282 covered Consumer Discretionary peers, as of 2026-09-02
  • 3-year revenue CAGRmiddle range 327 covered Consumer Discretionary peers
  • free cash flow (absolute dollars, latest fiscal year)bottom 10% 311 covered Consumer Discretionary peers, as of FY2025

Position among covered Consumer Discretionary companies that report each metric (minimum 5 peers). A relative position within our covered catalog — not a valuation, quality, or investment judgment. A higher percentile is simply a higher value (for P/E, more expensive on earnings — never "better"). Informational only.

Ask how SABR stacks up against peers →

Dividend coverage

Not assessed — last reported dividend predates the accounts. The most recent fiscal year in which SABR reported a dividend payment is FY2020, while its reported financial statements run through FY2025. Coverage is therefore not assessed for the latest year — an FY2020 ratio would not describe SABR today.

Coverage is derived from reported SEC EDGAR XBRL figures, comparing dividends paid against net income and free cash flow for the SAME fiscal year. It is not shown here because the latest fiscal year with a reported dividend payment (FY2020) is older than the latest year of reported financial statements (FY2025), so any ratio would describe an out-of-date year. Informational only — not financial advice.

Ask whether SABR's dividend is covered →

Quarterly results

QuarterRevenueOperating incomeNet incomeDiluted EPSOperating cash flowCapex
Q2 FY2026 2026-06-30$712M$93M—-$0.09$36M†$26M†
Q1 FY2026 2026-03-31$760M$116M—$0.02-$134M$21M
Q4 FY2025 2025-12-31$667M†$21M†—-$0.27†$139M†$23M†
Q3 FY2025 2025-09-30$715M$94M—$1.98$34M†$20M†
Q2 FY2025 2025-06-30$687M$89M—-$0.65-$218M†$22M†
Q1 FY2025 2025-03-31$702M$91M—$0.09-$64M$17M
Q4 FY2024 2024-12-31$645M†$46M†-$75M†-$0.20†$76M†$15M†
Q3 FY2024 2024-09-30$691M$58M-$63M-$0.16$24M†$19M†

† Not filed as a discrete quarter: derived from the company's own year-to-date figures (for example the fourth quarter as the fiscal year minus the first nine months). A derived per-share figure is approximate, because the share count moves within the year.

Balance sheet at 2026-06-30

  • Cash and equivalents$676M
  • Total debt$4.3B borrowings only; leases excluded
  • Net debt$3.6B total debt − cash − short-term investments

From the company's own SEC 10-Q and 10-K filings (XBRL), re-read every week. Figures in US dollars as filed; informational only — not financial advice.

Ask how SABR's latest quarter compares →

How SABRE CORP looks technically

SABRE CORP (SABR) is trading 11.8% below its 200-day average, the long-term trend line — a long-term downtrend. Its 50-day average crossed above its 200-day average about 110 trading days ago — a "golden cross", a bullish long-term signal. A strong downtrend is in place — ADX, a 0–100 trend-strength gauge, is 25, with sellers in control. Momentum is beaten down — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 22, in oversold territory (below 30). It just made a new 20-day low, its first since 2026-04-10, breaking below its recent trading range. It is 39.2% below its highest point of the past year.

Trend

8
Distance from the 200-dayit is trading 11.8% below its 200-day average, the long-term trend line — a long-term downtrend-11.8%
50-day moving averageits average price over the last 50 trading days — a short-term trend line — is $2.06$2.06
200-day moving averageits average price over the last 200 trading days — the long-term trend line — is $1.72$1.72
Swing structureeach recent peak has been higher than the one before it and each dip has been shallower — the pattern chart-watchers call an uptrend, which describes where price has already been and not where it goes nexthigher highs and higher lows
Last swing turnits last significant turn was a swing high 34 calendar days ago — the swings before that are what the structure reading is measured on34 sessions
Wave structureits recent swings can be read as a completed three-part upward correction — a pullback in the A-B-C shape Elliott-wave chartists use; the labelling fails if price closes above 2.5. It is the only labelling that fits, though not with textbook proportions, and it describes the swings already printed, not what comes next.possible three-wave upward correction, complete (atypical proportions)
Since the 50/200 crossits 50-day average crossed above its 200-day average about 110 trading days ago — a "golden cross", a bullish long-term signal110 sessions
Trend strength (14-day ADX)a strong downtrend is in place — ADX, a 0–100 trend-strength gauge, is 25, with sellers in control25.2

Momentum

3
14-day RSImomentum is beaten down — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 22, in oversold territory (below 30)21.6
Position in its 14-day rangeit is trading right at the bottom of its 14-day range ($1.50 to $2.04) — its "stochastic" reading is 4 out of 100, where 0 would mean closing exactly at the 14-session low and 100 exactly at the high. This measures WHERE the price sits inside its recent range, which is a different question from the RSI beside it: RSI is a momentum gauge, measuring how FAST the price has been moving, so a stock can drift quietly to the bottom of its range with an ordinary RSI, or fall sharply and still sit in the middle. It has been climbing within that range over the last few sessions.3.7
Since the MACD crossed zeroMACD, a trend-momentum gauge, is in negative territory (momentum leaning bearish)20 sessions

Range

12
52-week highits highest closing price over the past year (about 252 trading days) was $2.50$2.50
From the 52-week highit is 39.2% below its 52-week high (its highest price of the past year)-39.2%
Above the 52-week lowit is 87.7% above its 52-week low (its lowest price of the past year)+87.7%
Below the 52-week highit is 39.2% below its highest point of the past year39.2%
Since a 20-day breakoutit just made a new 20-day low, its first since 2026-04-10, breaking below its recent trading range1 session
Since a 55-day breakoutit just made a new 55-day low, its first since 2026-04-10, breaking below its recent trading range1 session
All-time highits highest closing price on record is $30.45 (set on 2015-10-28)$30.45
Given back of the 52-week moveover the past year its closes ranged ($0.8176 to $2.33), and it has given back around half of its rise from last year’s low — 54% of it. Chart-watchers call 61.8%-65% given back the "golden pocket" — for this company that is $1.35 to $1.40. It is watched widely enough that orders cluster there, which is the honest reason it matters; it is not a forecast.53.6%
From the all-time highit is 95.0% below its all-time high-95.0%
Nearest price levelit is sitting right on a resistance level at $1.52 — a price it turned at twice since 2025-11-21, most recently on 2026-01-09. Since 2024-10-21 it has 1 such level below the current price and 9 above. Levels like these describe where the price has reversed or paused before; they are not a forecast of where it will go.+0.3%
All-time lowits lowest closing price on record is $0.81 (set on 2026-02-24)$0.81
Above the all-time lowit is 87.7% above its all-time low+87.7%

Volatility

5
Band width vs its own 6 monthsday-to-day price swings are unusually wide versus its own recent history (wider than about 94% of the past ~6 months)94th percentile
Typical daily rangein a typical session it travels about $0.1036 between its high and its low — about 6.8% of its price. That is its "average true range" over the last 14 sessions, which also counts the distance from the previous close, so a day that opens well away from yesterday counts as the large move it was$0.1036
Bollinger bands (20-day, ±2σ)most of its recent trading has stayed between about $1.51 and $2.29 — the "Bollinger bands", a range drawn two standard deviations either side of its 20-day average price, which widens when the stock gets more volatile and narrows when it settles$1.51 – $1.90 – $2.29
Typical daily range (% of price)its price moves about 6.8% in a typical session — more volatile than most companies we cover. This is the average gap between a session's high and low over the last 14 sessions, counting overnight moves, expressed against the current price so it can be compared with companies trading at any price6.8%
Stretch from the 200-day averageit is trading 2.0 daily ranges below its 200-day average price (11.8% below it in plain percentage terms) — a way of asking how far it has stretched from its own average in units of how far it normally moves in a day, so a calm company and a jumpy one can be compared on the same scale2.0 daily ranges below its 200-day average

Volume

1
Volume vs its 30-day averagetrading volume is about normal versus its 30-day average0.71×

Analyst

2
Change in the average price targetanalysts' average price target is unchanged from the prior reading0.0%
Change in the consensus ratingthe analyst consensus rating is unchanged since the prior readingunchanged

Candlestick patterns

2
Since a doji5 sessions ago it opened and closed at almost the same price after trading through a wider range — a "doji", the classic picture of buyers and sellers finishing the session level5 sessions ago
Since a bearish engulfing3 sessions ago it opened above the previous session's close and finished below that session's open — a "bearish engulfing" pair, where one down day more than undid the up day before it3 sessions ago

Price gaps

2
Gap at the openit opened on 2026-10-21 0.6% above the previous session's close — an overnight gap, the part of the move that happened while the market was shut, and traded back through that level before the close+0.6%
Gap filleda 3.0% gap up opened on 2026-09-22 has been "filled" 21 sessions ago — price traded back through the level the gap left behind, and it closed again during the very session that opened it21 sessions ago

Price streaks

1
Closing streakit has closed lower 4 sessions in a row, a -15.08% move over the run — an unbroken run of down days, which describes what has already happened and says nothing about the next session4 sessions down

Relative strength

4
vs market, 1 monthover the past 1 month this stock lagged the market by 34.7 percentage points (the stock lost 34.8% while the market lost 0.1%)-34.7%
vs market, 3 monthsover the past 3 months this stock lagged the market by 15.5 percentage points (the stock lost 12.1% while the market gained 3.3%)-15.4%
vs market, 6 monthsover the past 6 months this stock lagged the market by 32.3 percentage points (the stock lost 22.4% while the market gained 9.8%)-32.3%
vs market, 12 monthsover the past 12 months this stock lagged the market by 33.9 percentage points (the stock lost 18.7% while the market gained 15.2%)-33.9%

Signal agreement

2
Bullish technical signals3 of the 9 technical signals we can compute for it are currently in a bullish state: a "golden cross" — its 50-day average is above its 200-day, its RSI momentum gauge is oversold (a beaten-down reading), near the bottom of its 14-day range (oversold) — these describe past price behaviour, not a forecast3 of 9
Bearish technical signals6 of the 9 technical signals we can compute for it are currently in a bearish state: trading below its 200-day average, a fresh 20-day low, MACD momentum is negative, a strong downtrend, with sellers in control, lagging the market over 6 months, trading below the Ichimoku cloud — these describe past price behaviour, not a forecast6 of 9

Trend (Ichimoku cloud)

1
Vs the Ichimoku cloudtrading 23% below the Ichimoku cloud — a band drawn from where its own highs and lows sat up to 2026-09-15 and projected forward over today's price, the side traders read as an established downtrend, with the band above acting as the level that would have to be cleared. The band itself is thick, spanning 11.1% of the share price, which is taken to mean a barrier that has held for a while and takes effort to cross.-22.7%

Volume-weighted price

2
Vs this year’s average price paidthe price is 7% below the average price paid so far this year, so the typical buyer over that stretch is under water. That average is $1.63 — a volume-weighted average of daily closes over 200 sessions, not a true tick-by-tick VWAP.-6.9%
Vs the average paid since it last reportedthe price is 25% below the average price paid since it last reported on 2026-08-06 (its 10-Q), so the typical buyer over that stretch is under water. That average is $2.03 — a volume-weighted average of daily closes over 54 sessions, not a true tick-by-tick VWAP.-25.3%

Price levels it has turned at before

SABR last closed at $1.52 on 2026-10-21. Since 2024-10-21 it has turned at 1 price below its last close and 9 above; the nearest below and the 3 nearest above are listed, nearest first.

LevelSideDistanceEvidence
$1.52Resistance0.3% above the last closeturned there twice · 2025-11-21 to 2026-01-09
$1.38Support9.3% below the last closeturned there three times · 2026-01-22 to 2026-04-02
$1.70Resistance11.6% above the last closeturned there four times · 2025-09-03 to 2026-07-14
$1.74Resistance14.5% above the last closeturned there twice · 2025-08-07 to 2025-10-10

A level is a price this company reversed or paused at more than once — they describe past behaviour, not a forecast of where the price will go.

Wave structure

Its recent swings can be read as a three-part upward correction — the A-B-C shape chartists use for a pullback — now complete.

This labelling fails — stops being a possible reading at all — if it closes above $2.50.

It is the only labelling that fits these swings, though its proportions are not the textbook ones.

This reading has stood for 36 trading days, since 2026-09-01.

Read from daily closes as of 2026-10-21.

An Elliott-wave count describes the swings already printed and the level that would disprove it. It is not a forecast, a target, or advice.

Based on daily closing prices as of 2026-10-21. Describes past price behavior only — informational, not financial advice.

Ask about SABR's technicals →

Analyst consensus

  • Consensus ratingHold (2.67 mean, 1=Strong Buy…5=Strong Sell) — 5 analysts
  • Mean price target$2.11 range $1.75 – $2.50; median $2.10

Analyst estimates, as of 2026-10-19. These are third-party analyst opinions and price targets, aggregated — not a recommendation, prediction, or advice from stocks-llm. Informational only.

Analyst EPS estimate for SABR

  • Consensus EPS estimate-$0.02 next reporting period, as of 2026-08-08

Change over time is not available yet: it needs two readings of the same reporting period at least 30 days apart, and we have been recording these estimates since 2026-08-04. An estimate for a DIFFERENT quarter is not a revision, so a reading from before the last report is never compared with one after it.

The consensus estimate for the next reporting period, and how it has moved between readings of that SAME period. A change is measured only between readings estimating one period — when a company reports, the consensus moves to the next quarter and the two numbers are not comparable. Informational only, not a forecast and not advice.

Ask how SABR's estimates have moved →

Key risks (from latest filing)

["Exposure to inflationary pressures affecting operational costs","Dependency on transaction-based fee revenue models","Risks associated with ongoing restructuring and workforce reduction programs"]

See SABR's biggest risks from its latest 10-Q →

What changed in the latest 10-Q

AI-assisted comparison of SABR's 10-Q filed 2026-05-07 against the prior one filed 2025-11-05.

Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)

  • Added:
    • Reference to Annual Report on Form 10-K filed February 18, 2026 (newer filing, dated 2026-05-07)
    • Statement that Sabre is an 'AI-native technology leader, backed by one of the world's largest travel data clouds' (newer filing)
    • New section 'Inflation offset program' describing $61 million in restructuring costs incurred since Q4 2025, with expected total of approximately $65 million through 2027 (newer filing)
    • Revenue terminology change: 'Distribution' renamed to 'Marketplace' and 'IT Solutions' renamed to 'Airline Technology' effective current quarter (newer filing)
    • Reference to 'Sabre Mosaic™ Marketplace' and 'Sabre Mosaic™ Airline Technology' product naming (newer filing)
    • Reference to conflict in the Middle East impacting air distribution volume and fuel prices creating headwinds in Q1 2026 (newer filing)
    • Statement that bookings growth pressures are expected to continue into Q2 2026 (newer filing)
    • Reference to 'payments and media' as agency solution offerings (newer filing)
  • Removed:
    • Reference to Annual Report on Form 10-K filed February 20, 2025 (older filing, dated 2025-11-05)
    • Statement that company 'make[s] travel happen' as opening tagline (older filing)
    • Reference to 'GDS' (Global Distribution System) in revenue description (older filing)
    • Statement about U.S. government shutdown negatively impacting Q4 2025 air distribution volumes (older filing)
    • Discussion of de-migrations from carriers impacting IT solutions passengers boarded (older filing)
    • Statement that IT solutions revenue has 'leveled-off relative to prior year amounts with modest growth expected for the remainder of 2025' (older filing)
    • Reference to refinancing debt during 2023, 2024, and 2025 resulting in higher interest rates (older filing)
    • Disclosure that approximately 13% of debt is variable and impacted by interest rate changes (older filing)
    • Section titled 'Factors Affecting our Results' referencing discussion in Annual Report on Form 10-K (older filing)
  • Reworded:
    • 'purchase agreement' changed to 'definitive agreement' in Hospitality Solutions Sale description (older vs newer)
    • Cash proceeds from Hospitality Solutions Sale changed from '$965 million' to '$969 million' net (older vs newer)
    • Description of Hospitality Solutions changed from 'classified as discontinued operations in the second quarter of 2025' to present continuous tense regarding business disposition during 2025 (older vs newer)
    • 'will provide transition services' changed to 'are providing transition services' indicating ongoing provision (older vs newer)
    • 'our GDS for bookings' changed to 'our Marketplace for bookings' reflecting terminology update (older vs newer)
    • 'Recent industry air distribution volume growth has generally leveled off' changed to 'Industry air distribution volume growth has recently come under pressure due to conflict in the Middle East' (older vs newer)
    • Replaced discussion of U.S. government shutdown and de-migration impacts with discussion of commercial wins and Middle East conflict impacts (older vs newer)
    • Removed evaluative language about 'measures to enhance financial position' in liquidity outlook (older vs newer)
  • Notes:
    • Newer filing text appears truncated at end ('...and an'), limiting full comparison of outlook sections
    • Older filing text also appears truncated ('This'), limiting complete assessment of final sections
    • Change in cash proceeds amount ($965M to $969M) may represent accounting adjustments or corrections rather than operational changes

Risk Factors

  • Added:
    • New opening sentence in risk factors preamble: 'These disclosures reflect our beliefs and opinions as to factors that, in whole or in part, could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and stock price. References to past events are provided by way of example only and are not intended to be a complete listing or a representation as to whether or not these factors have occurred in the past or their likelihood of occurring in the future.' (filed 2026-05-07)
    • Addition to disruption factors: 'government shutdowns' moved to separate mention in item (3) as 'changes in business practices' context (filed 2026-05-07)
    • Expanded reference to AI in competitive section: 'Our industry is marked by rapid technological developments and innovations, such as the use of artificial intelligence ("AI"), and evolving industry standards, best practices, and related regulations... Our competitors or other third parties may incorporate AI into their products more quickly or more successfully than we do, which could impair our ability to compete effectively and adversely affect our results of operations.' (filed 2026-05-07)
    • New risk section heading: 'Our business is exposed to pricing pressure from travel suppliers.' (filed 2026-05-07)
  • Removed:
    • Entire risk factor section titled 'Our ability to recruit, train and retain employees, including our key executive officers and technical employees, is critical to our results of operations and future growth' has been removed (filed 2026-05-07)
    • Phrase 'through the GDS or directly through other channels. As travel suppliers adopt innovative solutions that function across channels, our operating results could suffer if we do not foresee the need for new products or services to meet competition either for GDS or for other distribution IT solutions' replaced with simpler language about 'distribution systems' (filed 2026-05-07)
    • Reference to 'New Distribution Capability' with full acronym expansion removed; now abbreviated as 'NDC' (filed 2026-05-07)
    • Phrase 'government shutdowns' removed from item (5) and relocated within item (3) structure (filed 2026-05-07)
  • Reworded:
    • Changed from 'These factors, in whole or in part, could materially and adversely affect' to 'These disclosures reflect our beliefs and opinions as to factors that, in whole or in part, could materially and adversely affect' in preamble (filed 2026-05-07)
    • Changed 'suppliers seek IT solutions that provide the same traveler experience across all channels of distribution, whether indirectly through the GDS' to 'suppliers seek solutions that provide the same traveler experience across all channels of distribution, whether indirectly through distribution systems' (filed 2026-05-07)
    • Expanded 'New Distribution Capability' reference to include parenthetical '(NDC)' on first mention in newer filing (filed 2026-05-07)
    • Restructured factor (3) to clarify 'government shutdowns' placement and add 'changing attitudes towards the environmental costs of travel' in specific sequence (filed 2026-05-07)
  • Notes:
    • Newer filing text appears truncated at end ('Our business is exposed to pricing pressure from travel suppliers.' section is incomplete)
    • Older filing text also appears truncated, making complete comparison of later sections impossible
    • The removal of the 'recruitment and retention' risk factor is significant but the comparison is based solely on presence/absence in provided text

AI-assisted comparison of two SEC filing sections. It describes wording and theme changes only, makes no materiality, legal, or investment judgement, and is not financial advice. Informational only — not financial advice.

Ask what changed in SABR's latest 10-Q →

Insider activity (SEC Form 4)

No open-market insider purchases or sales are on record for SABR — recent Form 4 activity was compensation-related (awards, option exercises, or tax withholding), not open-market buying or selling.

View full insider trading history → View SEC Form 3/4/5 filings

Only open-market purchases (SEC code P) and sales (code S) are counted here. Option exercises, vesting/awards, gifts, and shares withheld for taxes are excluded — they are compensation or mechanical, not open-market conviction. Sales may be planned and non-discretionary (e.g. a Rule 10b5-1 plan) and are not necessarily bearish; open-market buying is not a recommendation to buy. Informational only — not financial advice.

Institutional ownership (13F)

5 institutional 13F filers reported holding SABR as of 2026-06-30 (quarter-end position, filed within 45 days).

  • Distinct 13F filers 5
  • Reported shares held 73,039,808
  • Reported value $152,653,198

reported quarterly holdings change (2026-03-31 → 2026-06-30): 0 new, 4 increased, 1 decreased, 0 exited. Change counts cover only managers that filed 13F reports in BOTH quarters, derived between two quarter-end snapshots — not same-day trades; a single manager is never said to have "bought" or "sold".

Institutional holdings are quarter-end long positions reported on SEC Form 13F-HR, filed up to 45 days after the quarter ends — they are delayed, are not real-time trades, exclude short positions and most non-US securities, and are not investment advice. Any increase/decrease is a reported change between two quarterly snapshots, not a same-day purchase or sale. These are quarter-end snapshots from the 13F filings on SEC EDGAR, filed within 45 days — not real-time, and any change is a difference between two quarterly reports, not a same-day trade. Informational only — not financial advice.

Ask about SABR's institutional holders → See what each manager we track holds →

Short interest (FINRA)

SABR had 27,675,420 shares of reported short interest as of the 2026-09-30 FINRA settlement date (delayed, bi-monthly; not real-time).

SABR had 6.86% of its shares outstanding sold short as of the 2026-09-30 FINRA settlement date (percent of FLOAT would be higher — float is not disclosed in the source). FINRA reported 4.4 days to cover at the same settlement.

  • Reported short interest (shares) 27,675,420
  • Short interest (% of shares outstanding) 6.86%
  • Prior settlement (shares) 30,061,211
  • Reported change -7.94%
  • Days to cover (reported) 4.4

Reported to FINRA as of the 2026-09-30 settlement date. Short interest is reported to FINRA and published on a delayed, bi-monthly schedule (as of a settlement date, disseminated roughly eight business days later) — it is NOT real-time, does not cover every venue or all US trading, and is not a short-squeeze prediction or investment advice. Days-to-cover is the value FINRA reports; percent of float is not shown because the source file carries no share-count denominator — where a percent appears it is of shares OUTSTANDING, the larger base, and is therefore a floor on percent of float. Informational only — not financial advice.

Ask about SABR's short interest →

Competitors & peers

  • Amadeus IT Group
  • Travelport
  • Amadeus (AAMS.MC)

AI-enriched competitor set. Linked names are companies covered by stocks-llm; other named peers are shown for reference only.

Not quite? Describe exactly what you want →

Frequently asked questions

What does SABRE CORP (SABR) do?

Sabre is an AI-native travel technology provider that operates a global travel marketplace and provides airline technology solutions. The company empowers airlines, travel agencies, and partners to retail, distribute, and fulfill travel services through its data-driven software platform. Following the 2025 divestiture of its hospitality business, Sabre now operates as a unified entity focused on its Sabre Mosaic marketplace and airline IT systems.

What sector is SABRE CORP (SABR) in?

SABRE CORP (SABR) is classified in the Consumer Discretionary sector. Its industry is Travel Technology. It trades on NASDAQ.

Does SABR pay a dividend?

No — SABRE CORP (SABR) does not currently pay a dividend (market data, as of 2026-09-02). Informational only — not financial advice.

Who are SABRE CORP's (SABR) competitors?

Notable peers of SABRE CORP (SABR) include Amadeus IT Group, Travelport and Amadeus. This peer set is informational only — not financial advice.

Is SABRE CORP (SABR) overbought or oversold right now?

SABRE CORP (SABR) is currently in oversold territory (its 14-day RSI is 22, below 30) (as of 2026-10-21). RSI describes recent price momentum, not a forecast — informational only, not financial advice.

Where does stocks-llm's data on SABR come from?

Fundamentals come from SEC XBRL company filings for the figures marked with a fiscal year, and market data, as of 2026-09-02 for the rest; prices are market data, as of 2026-09-02; company filings and profile facts come from SEC EDGAR. All figures are delayed daily-close data shown with their as-of date — informational only, not financial advice.

Fundamentals: SEC XBRL company filings for the figures marked with a fiscal year, and market data, as of 2026-09-02 for the rest. Filings: SEC EDGAR. Prices are delayed daily-close data.

Last updated 2026-10-21.

Informational only — NOT financial advice. All figures are delayed daily-close data from SEC EDGAR & market data, shown with their as-of date.