ENERGY FUELS INC (UUUU)
Energy · critical minerals & uranium production · NYSE American
Energy Fuels is building a vertically integrated, domestic U.S. supply chain for nuclear fuel, rare earth elements, and critical minerals essential for clean energy and national security.
What ENERGY FUELS INC does
Energy Fuels is a producer of critical materials including uranium, rare earth elements (REEs), vanadium, and heavy mineral sands (HMS). The company operates the White Mesa Mill in Utah, the only facility in the U.S. licensed to process uranium and separate rare earth oxides, and is expanding its capabilities to include the entire rare earth value chain through mine-to-magnet integration.
Themes: uranium / nuclear energy, rare earth elements / REE separation, EV supply chain, critical minerals / national security, mine-to-magnet integration
Fundamentals
- Price$8.21 as of 2026-10-20 close
- Market cap$2.1B as of 2026-07-31 (share count; price 2026-10-20)
- 1-year return-63.6% 2025-10-20 close $22.58 → 2026-10-20 close $8.21
- P/En/a negative earnings
- Net margin-129.9% FY2025, SEC XBRL
- ROE-12.5% FY2025, SEC XBRL
- ROICn/a No figure: its pre-tax income was zero or negative, so there is no tax rate to apply.
- Debt / equity0.85 borrowings, leases excluded / equity — 10-Q/10-K balance sheet 2026-06-30
- Revenue growth (YoY)-15.6% FY2025, SEC XBRL
- Revenue CAGR (3y)+74.0% SEC XBRL
- Beta1.58 as of 2026-09-02
- Last reported earnings2016-03-08 most recent in our data — SEC EDGAR Form 8-K (Item 2.02); no newer announcement filed
How UUUU compares in its sector
- net profit marginbottom 10% 135 covered Energy peers, as of 2026-09-02
- operating marginbottom 10% 122 covered Energy peers, as of 2026-09-02
- return on equitybottom 25% 143 covered Energy peers, as of 2026-09-02
- 3-year revenue CAGRtop 10% 139 covered Energy peers
- free cash flow (absolute dollars, latest fiscal year)bottom 10% 96 covered Energy peers, as of FY2025
Position among covered Energy companies that report each metric (minimum 5 peers). A relative position within our covered catalog — not a valuation, quality, or investment judgment. A higher percentile is simply a higher value (for P/E, more expensive on earnings — never "better"). Informational only.
Top 10 scores & list membership
UUUU is not currently in any published Top 10 list. Its scores are below.
Top 10 score
25.3 #1249 of 1,265 scored · #71 of 72 in Energy
Valuation 61st (price to book 2.6) and growth 50th (3-year revenue CAGR 74%, revenue growth year over year -15.6%); weakest is trend (4th, it is 70.6% below its highest point of the past year).
Scores as of 20 Oct 2026. Each bar is a percentile: how this company ranked against every company the score ranked, 0–100. A list is a published formula and its output, not a recommendation. Method version 4.
Quarterly results
| Quarter | Revenue | Operating income | Net income | Diluted EPS | Operating cash flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 FY2026 2026-06-30 | $25M | -$31M | -$33M | -$0.13 | -$26M† |
| Q1 FY2026 2026-03-31 | $36M | -$17M | -$11M | -$0.04 | $8M |
| Q4 FY2025 2025-12-31 | $27M† | -$22M† | -$21M† | -$0.09† | -$16M† |
| Q3 FY2025 2025-09-30 | $18M | -$27M | -$17M | -$0.07 | -$28M† |
| Q2 FY2025 2025-06-30 | $4M | -$26M | -$22M | -$0.10 | -$26M† |
| Q1 FY2025 2025-03-31 | $17M | -$26M | -$26M | -$0.13 | -$19M |
| Q4 FY2024 2024-12-31 | $40M† | -$29M† | -$33M† | -$0.19† | -$36M† |
| Q3 FY2024 2024-09-30 | $4M | -$12M | -$12M | -$0.07 | -$7M† |
† Not filed as a discrete quarter: derived from the company's own year-to-date figures (for example the fourth quarter as the fiscal year minus the first nine months). A derived per-share figure is approximate, because the share count moves within the year.
Balance sheet at 2026-06-30
- Cash and equivalents$58M
- Total debt$678M borrowings only; leases excluded
- Net debt$619M total debt − cash − short-term investments
From the company's own SEC 10-Q and 10-K filings (XBRL), re-read every week. Figures in US dollars as filed; informational only — not financial advice.
How ENERGY FUELS INC looks technically
ENERGY FUELS INC (UUUU) is trading 51.1% below its 200-day average, the long-term trend line — a long-term downtrend. Its 50-day average crossed below its 200-day average about 77 trading days ago — a "death cross", a bearish long-term signal. A strong downtrend is in place — ADX, a 0–100 trend-strength gauge, is 42, with sellers in control. Momentum is beaten down — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 23, in oversold territory (below 30). It made a new 20-day low about 2 trading days ago. It is 70.6% below its highest point of the past year.
Trend
8
| Distance from the 200-day | it is trading 51.1% below its 200-day average, the long-term trend line — a long-term downtrend | -51.1% |
|---|---|---|
| 50-day moving average | its average price over the last 50 trading days — a short-term trend line — is $12.44 | $12.44 |
| 200-day moving average | its average price over the last 200 trading days — the long-term trend line — is $16.80 | $16.80 |
| Swing structure | each recent peak has been lower than the one before it and each dip deeper — the pattern chart-watchers call a downtrend, which describes where price has already been and not where it goes next | lower highs and lower lows |
| Last swing turn | its last significant turn was a swing low 34 calendar days ago — the swings before that are what the structure reading is measured on | 34 sessions |
| Wave structure | its recent swings can be read as a five-part downward sequence — what Elliott-wave chartists call an impulse — now in the fourth leg, a pullback against that downward direction; the labelling fails if price closes above 14. It is the only labelling that fits, and it describes the swings already printed, not what comes next. | possible downward five-wave sequence, in wave 4 |
| Since the 50/200 cross | its 50-day average crossed below its 200-day average about 77 trading days ago — a "death cross", a bearish long-term signal | 77 sessions |
| Trend strength (14-day ADX) | a strong downtrend is in place — ADX, a 0–100 trend-strength gauge, is 42, with sellers in control | 41.9 |
Momentum
3
| 14-day RSI | momentum is beaten down — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 23, in oversold territory (below 30) | 23.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Position in its 14-day range | it is trading near the bottom of its 14-day range ($7.81 to $11.56) — its "stochastic" reading is 11 out of 100, where 0 would mean closing exactly at the 14-session low and 100 exactly at the high. This measures WHERE the price sits inside its recent range, which is a different question from the RSI beside it: RSI is a momentum gauge, measuring how FAST the price has been moving, so a stock can drift quietly to the bottom of its range with an ordinary RSI, or fall sharply and still sit in the middle. It has been slipping within that range over the last few sessions. | 10.7 |
| Since the MACD crossed zero | MACD, a trend-momentum gauge, is in negative territory (momentum leaning bearish) | 35 sessions |
Range
12
| 52-week high | its highest closing price over the past year (about 252 trading days) was $27.90 | $27.90 |
|---|---|---|
| From the 52-week high | it is 70.6% below its 52-week high (its highest price of the past year) | -70.6% |
| Above the 52-week low | it is 5.1% above its 52-week low (its lowest price of the past year) | +5.1% |
| Below the 52-week high | it is 70.6% below its highest point of the past year | 70.6% |
| Since a 20-day breakout | it made a new 20-day low about 2 trading days ago | 2 sessions |
| Since a 55-day breakout | it made a new 55-day low about 2 trading days ago | 2 sessions |
| All-time high | its highest closing price on record is $240.00 (set on 2007-04-13) | $240.00 |
| Given back of the 52-week move | over the past year its closes ranged ($8.16 to $27.72), and it has recovered essentially none of its fall from last year’s high — 0% of it. Chart-watchers call 61.8%-65% given back the "golden pocket" — for this company that is $20.25 to $20.87. It is watched widely enough that orders cluster there, which is the honest reason it matters; it is not a forecast. | 0.3% |
| From the all-time high | it is 96.6% below its all-time high | -96.6% |
| Nearest price level | it is sitting right on a support level at $8.20 — a price it turned at twice since 2025-08-01, most recently on 2025-08-19. Since 2024-10-21 it has 3 such levels below the current price and 8 above. Levels like these describe where the price has reversed or paused before; they are not a forecast of where it will go. | -0.2% |
| All-time low | its lowest closing price on record is $0.78 (set on 2020-03-12) | $0.78 |
| Above the all-time low | it is 952.6% above its all-time low | +952.6% |
Volatility
5
| Band width vs its own 6 months | day-to-day price swings are unusually wide versus its own recent history (wider than about 99% of the past ~6 months) | 99th percentile |
|---|---|---|
| Typical daily range | in a typical session it travels about $0.6168 between its high and its low — about 7.5% of its price. That is its "average true range" over the last 14 sessions, which also counts the distance from the previous close, so a day that opens well away from yesterday counts as the large move it was | $0.6168 |
| Bollinger bands (20-day, ±2σ) | most of its recent trading has stayed between about $7.77 and $12.40 — the "Bollinger bands", a range drawn two standard deviations either side of its 20-day average price, which widens when the stock gets more volatile and narrows when it settles | $7.77 – $10.08 – $12.40 |
| Typical daily range (% of price) | its price moves about 7.5% in a typical session — more volatile than most companies we cover. This is the average gap between a session's high and low over the last 14 sessions, counting overnight moves, expressed against the current price so it can be compared with companies trading at any price | 7.5% |
| Stretch from the 200-day average | it is trading 13.9 daily ranges below its 200-day average price (51.1% below it in plain percentage terms) — a way of asking how far it has stretched from its own average in units of how far it normally moves in a day, so a calm company and a jumpy one can be compared on the same scale | 13.9 daily ranges below its 200-day average |
Volume
1
| Volume vs its 30-day average | trading volume is about normal versus its 30-day average | 0.94× |
|---|
Analyst
2
| Change in the average price target | analysts' average price target is unchanged from the prior reading | 0.0% |
|---|---|---|
| Change in the consensus rating | not available for this company yet | n/a |
Price gaps
3
| Gap at the open | it opened on 2026-10-20 2.0% below the previous session's close — an overnight gap, the part of the move that happened while the market was shut, and traded back through that level before the close | -2.0% |
|---|---|---|
| Open gap | it gapped 3.0% below the previous close 4 sessions ago and has not traded back through the level it left behind at 9.27 — an "unfilled gap", which describes a price range no trade has since crossed and is not a forecast that it will be crossed | -3.0% |
| Gap filled | a 2.1% gap up opened on 2026-10-19 has been "filled" 1 session ago — price traded back through the level the gap left behind, and it closed again during the very session that opened it | 1 session ago |
Price streaks
1
| Closing streak | it closed higher in its latest session, after a session that did not close higher — a single up day rather than a run | 1 session up |
|---|
Relative strength
4
| vs market, 1 month | over the past 1 month this stock lagged the market by 30.8 percentage points (the stock lost 29.8% while the market gained 1.0%) | -30.8% |
|---|---|---|
| vs market, 3 months | over the past 3 months this stock lagged the market by 33.7 percentage points (the stock lost 30.1% while the market gained 3.6%) | -33.7% |
| vs market, 6 months | over the past 6 months this stock lagged the market by 70.3 percentage points (the stock lost 61.8% while the market gained 8.5%) | -70.3% |
| vs market, 12 months | over the past 12 months this stock lagged the market by 78.2 percentage points (the stock lost 63.6% while the market gained 14.6%) | -78.2% |
Signal agreement
2
| Bullish technical signals | 2 of the 9 technical signals we can compute for it are currently in a bullish state: its RSI momentum gauge is oversold (a beaten-down reading), near the bottom of its 14-day range (oversold) — these describe past price behaviour, not a forecast | 2 of 9 |
|---|---|---|
| Bearish technical signals | 7 of the 9 technical signals we can compute for it are currently in a bearish state: a "death cross" — its 50-day average is below its 200-day, trading below its 200-day average, a fresh 20-day low, MACD momentum is negative, a strong downtrend, with sellers in control, lagging the market over 6 months, trading below the Ichimoku cloud — these describe past price behaviour, not a forecast | 7 of 9 |
Trend (Ichimoku cloud)
1
| Vs the Ichimoku cloud | trading 40% below the Ichimoku cloud — a band drawn from where its own highs and lows sat up to 2026-09-14 and projected forward over today's price, the side traders read as an established downtrend, with the band above acting as the level that would have to be cleared. The band itself is moderate, spanning 5.1% of the share price. | -39.6% |
|---|
Volume-weighted price
2
| Vs this year’s average price paid | the price is 54% below the average price paid so far this year, so the typical buyer over that stretch is under water. That average is $17.88 — a volume-weighted average of daily closes over 197 sessions, not a true tick-by-tick VWAP. | -54.1% |
|---|---|---|
| Vs the average paid since it last reported | the price is 33% below the average price paid since it last reported on 2026-08-05 (its 10-Q), so the typical buyer over that stretch is under water. That average is $12.19 — a volume-weighted average of daily closes over 54 sessions, not a true tick-by-tick VWAP. | -32.7% |
Price levels it has turned at before
UUUU last closed at $8.21 on 2026-10-20. Since 2024-10-21 it has turned at 3 prices below its last close and 8 above; the 3 nearest below and the 3 nearest above are listed, nearest first.
| Level | Side | Distance | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| $8.20 | Support | 0.2% below the last close | turned there twice · 2025-08-01 to 2025-08-19 |
| $10.72 | Resistance | 30.5% above the last close | turned there twice · 2025-08-08 to 2026-07-29 |
| $5.08 | Support | 38.1% below the last close | turned there twice · 2024-12-31 to 2025-04-17 |
| $11.52 | Resistance | 40.3% above the last close | turned there twice · 2026-09-16 to 2026-10-06 |
| $4.23 | Support | 48.5% below the last close | turned there twice · 2025-04-30 to 2025-05-19 |
| $13.35 | Resistance | 62.6% above the last close | turned there twice · 2025-08-26 to 2025-12-16 |
A level is a price this company reversed or paused at more than once — they describe past behaviour, not a forecast of where the price will go.
Wave structure
Its recent swings can be read as a five-part downward sequence — what Elliott-wave chartists call an impulse — now in leg 4 of five, a pullback against that direction.
This labelling fails — stops being a possible reading at all — if it closes above $14.00.
It is the only labelling that fits these swings, though its proportions are not the textbook ones.
On past moves of this shape the leg has usually ended somewhere between $12.34 and $13.31 — that is where it has tended to end if the count holds, not a forecast of where the price goes.
This reading has stood for 19 trading days, since 2026-09-24.
Read from daily closes as of 2026-10-20.
An Elliott-wave count describes the swings already printed and the level that would disprove it. It is not a forecast, a target, or advice.
Screens: Trading below the 200-day moving average · Trading below the 50-day moving average · Oversold (14-day RSI below 30) · Pulled back from the 12-month high · Broke down to a new 20-day low · lagging the market | Learn: moving average · golden cross · adx · rsi · breakout · fifty two week high low
Based on daily closing prices as of 2026-10-20. Describes past price behavior only — informational, not financial advice.
Analyst consensus
- Consensus ratingStrong Buy (1.13 mean, 1=Strong Buy…5=Strong Sell) — 5 analysts
- Mean price target$23.35 range $14.00 – $32.50; median $25.00
Analyst estimates, as of 2026-10-21. These are third-party analyst opinions and price targets, aggregated — not a recommendation, prediction, or advice from stocks-llm. Informational only.
Key risks (from latest filing)
["Highly dependent on successful permitting and development of international mining projects (Madagascar, Australia, Brazil).","Operational risks associated with the restart, ramp-up, and integration of new REE processing and magnet manufacturing technologies.","Political and regulatory uncertainty in foreign jurisdictions where mining assets are located."]
What changed in the latest 10-Q
AI-assisted comparison of UUUU's 10-Q filed 2026-05-06 against the prior one filed 2025-11-03.
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
- Added:
- Newer filing (2026-05-06) adds reference to 'radium' as a product being evaluated for recovery with potential use in 'emerging TAT cancer treatments' (changed from 'radioisotopes' in older filing)
- Newer filing adds specific detail that Pinyon Plain, La Sal and Pandora mines are 'located in Arizona and Utah, respectively' with breakdown of ore mined (375,000 pounds from Pinyon Plain at 1.12% grade, 50,000 pounds from La Sal and Pandora)
- Newer filing describes Q1 2026 ore grade decrease at Pinyon Plain as 'due to moving from one high-grade zone to another' with expectation grades will 'increase moving forward'
- Newer filing states processing at Mill 'began in Q4 2025 and is expected to continue through at least Q2 2026'
- Newer filing specifies conventional ore run 'began in Q4 2025 and is expected to continue through Q2 2026'
- Newer filing adds description of Whirlwind mine potential to 'commence uranium production within one (1) year from a "go" decision' and could 'potentially increase Energy Fuels' uranium production by up to approximately 600,000 pounds per year starting as early as 2027'
- Newer filing adds detail that Roca Honda, Bullfrog, EZ and Sheep Mountain projects 'could expand the Company's uranium production to a run-rate of up to five million pounds of U 3 O 8 per year in the coming years'
- Newer filing reports '790,000 pounds of finished U 3 O 8 production' during Q (text appears truncated)
- Removed:
- Older filing (2025-11-03) contains phrase 'We responsibly produce' which does not appear in newer filing
- Older filing contains detailed explanation of HMS project strategy: 'The Company has secured its own HMS projects, which are expected to produce titanium and zircon minerals, along with uranium- and REE-bearing monazite sands in furtherance of a fully integrated U.S.-based REE supply chain. These include the Toliara Project in Madagascar, the Donald Project in Australia through the Company's Donald Project JV and the Bahia Project in Brazil' - this is not present in newer filing in comparable form
- Older filing identifies projects as 'Toliara HMS/REE project' and 'Toliara Project' in Madagascar; newer filing refers to 'Vara Mada Project'
- Older filing describes company activities using 'is currently' and lists specific exploration/development stage details for Bahia as 'exploration activities', whereas newer filing refers to 'continuing drilling activities and resource evaluation'
- Older filing states Donald Project FID 'could be made as early as December 31, 2025 or Q1 2026'; newer filing states 'could be made as early as Q2 2026'
- Older filing states Toliara FID 'could be made as early as 2026'; newer filing (for Vara Mada) states 'could be made as early as 2027'
- Older filing describes mining activities as 'stockpiling the mined ore at the Mill'; newer filing describes as 'processing and/or stockpiling the material at the Mill'
- Older filing contains 'Uranium Market Overview' section with discussion of market fundamentals and four long-term contracts; this section is not present in newer filing excerpt
- Reworded:
- Older filing: 'We responsibly produce several of the critical materials essential to United States (" U.S. ") energy security' changed to newer filing: 'We produce several of the critical materials essential to U.S. energy security' (removal of 'responsibly' and formatting change to 'U.S.')
- Older filing order: 'uranium, vanadium, REEs and HMS' changed to newer filing: 'uranium, REEs, vanadium and HMS'
- Older filing: 'HMS/REE properties and projects' changed to newer filing: 'uranium/vanadium and REE/HMS properties'
- Older filing: 'The Mill is our key to building a critical materials hub' changed from older: 'The Company is working to establish itself as a critical minerals hub'
- Older filing: 'potential radioisotopes production' changed to newer: references to 'radium' specifically
- Older filing: 'titanium and frames' changed to newer: 'titanium and airframes'
- Older filing: 'advanced ceramics in a wide range of applications in the medical, aerospace and chemical industries' simplified in newer to 'advanced ceramics in medical, aerospace and chemical applications'
- Project naming: Older filing 'Toliara Project' and 'Toliara HMS/REE project' versus newer filing 'Vara Mada Project'
- Older filing: 'performing exploration activities at its Bahia HMS/REE project' changed to newer: 'continuing drilling activities and resource evaluation at its Bahia Project'
- Older filing: 'performing final reclamation activities at its Kwale Project' changed to newer: 'completing reclamation and post‑closure monitoring activities at its Kwale Project'
- Notes:
- The newer filing's MD&A section appears truncated mid-sentence ('resulted in 790,000 pounds of finished U 3 O 8 production during Q'), limiting full comparison of Mill Activities section
- The older filing includes an 'Overview' and 'Uranium Market Overview' section that is not present in the newer filing excerpt provided, preventing complete comparison of those sections
- Project name change from 'Toliara' to 'Vara Mada' may reflect renaming or the newer filing may be referencing a different project; comparison cannot confirm which interpretation is correct without additional context
AI-assisted comparison of two SEC filing sections. It describes wording and theme changes only, makes no materiality, legal, or investment judgement, and is not financial advice. Informational only — not financial advice.
Insider activity (SEC Form 4)
No open-market insider purchases or sales recorded in the last 90 days, of which we have read Form 4 filings through 2026-10-16. The 5 days since 2026-10-16 have not been checked yet.
- Last 180 days · read to 2026-10-162 buys ($1M) · 0 sells — 2 buying insiders
Most recent open-market transaction: 2026-07-08. Based on Form 4 filings read through 2026-10-16; anything filed since is not yet included.
View full insider trading history → View SEC Form 3/4/5 filingsAsk about UUUU's insider activity →
Only open-market purchases (SEC code P) and sales (code S) are counted here. Option exercises, vesting/awards, gifts, and shares withheld for taxes are excluded — they are compensation or mechanical, not open-market conviction. Sales may be planned and non-discretionary (e.g. a Rule 10b5-1 plan) and are not necessarily bearish; open-market buying is not a recommendation to buy. Informational only — not financial advice.
Institutional ownership (13F)
5 institutional 13F filers reported holding UUUU as of 2026-06-30 (quarter-end position, filed within 45 days).
- Distinct 13F filers 5
- Reported shares held 32,414,884
- Reported value $470,018,275
reported quarterly holdings change (2026-03-31 → 2026-06-30): 1 new, 4 increased, 0 decreased, 1 exited. Change counts cover only managers that filed 13F reports in BOTH quarters, derived between two quarter-end snapshots — not same-day trades; a single manager is never said to have "bought" or "sold".
Institutional holdings are quarter-end long positions reported on SEC Form 13F-HR, filed up to 45 days after the quarter ends — they are delayed, are not real-time trades, exclude short positions and most non-US securities, and are not investment advice. Any increase/decrease is a reported change between two quarterly snapshots, not a same-day purchase or sale. These are quarter-end snapshots from the 13F filings on SEC EDGAR, filed within 45 days — not real-time, and any change is a difference between two quarterly reports, not a same-day trade. Informational only — not financial advice.
Ask about UUUU's institutional holders → See what each manager we track holds →
Short interest (FINRA)
UUUU had 56,233,124 shares of reported short interest as of the 2026-09-30 FINRA settlement date (delayed, bi-monthly; not real-time).
UUUU had 22.5% of its shares outstanding sold short as of the 2026-09-30 FINRA settlement date (percent of FLOAT would be higher — float is not disclosed in the source). FINRA reported 7.54 days to cover at the same settlement.
- Reported short interest (shares) 56,233,124
- Short interest (% of shares outstanding) 22.5%
- Prior settlement (shares) 55,697,399
- Reported change 0.96%
- Days to cover (reported) 7.54
Reported to FINRA as of the 2026-09-30 settlement date. Short interest is reported to FINRA and published on a delayed, bi-monthly schedule (as of a settlement date, disseminated roughly eight business days later) — it is NOT real-time, does not cover every venue or all US trading, and is not a short-squeeze prediction or investment advice. Days-to-cover is the value FINRA reports; percent of float is not shown because the source file carries no share-count denominator — where a percent appears it is of shares OUTSTANDING, the larger base, and is therefore a floor on percent of float. Informational only — not financial advice.
Competitors & peers
- Cameco (CCJ)
- Denison Mines (DNN)
- Uranium Energy Corp (UEC)
- MP Materials (MP)
- Lynas Rare Earths (LYSCF)
AI-enriched competitor set. Linked names are companies covered by stocks-llm; other named peers are shown for reference only.
Compare UUUU vs…
ENERGY FUELS INC is found in…
Frequently asked questions
What does ENERGY FUELS INC (UUUU) do?
Energy Fuels is a producer of critical materials including uranium, rare earth elements (REEs), vanadium, and heavy mineral sands (HMS). The company operates the White Mesa Mill in Utah, the only facility in the U.S. licensed to process uranium and separate rare earth oxides, and is expanding its capabilities to include the entire rare earth value chain through mine-to-magnet integration.
What sector is ENERGY FUELS INC (UUUU) in?
ENERGY FUELS INC (UUUU) is classified in the Energy sector. Its industry is critical minerals & uranium production. It trades on NYSE American.
Who are ENERGY FUELS INC's (UUUU) competitors?
Notable peers of ENERGY FUELS INC (UUUU) include Cameco, Denison Mines, Uranium Energy Corp, MP Materials and Lynas Rare Earths. This peer set is informational only — not financial advice.
Is ENERGY FUELS INC (UUUU) overbought or oversold right now?
ENERGY FUELS INC (UUUU) is currently in oversold territory (its 14-day RSI is 23, below 30) (as of 2026-10-20). RSI describes recent price momentum, not a forecast — informational only, not financial advice.
Where does stocks-llm's data on UUUU come from?
Fundamentals come from SEC XBRL company filings for the figures marked with a fiscal year, and market data, as of 2026-09-02 for the rest; prices are market data, as of 2026-09-02; company filings and profile facts come from SEC EDGAR. All figures are delayed daily-close data shown with their as-of date — informational only, not financial advice.
Fundamentals: SEC XBRL company filings for the figures marked with a fiscal year, and market data, as of 2026-09-02 for the rest. Filings: SEC EDGAR. Prices are delayed daily-close data.
Last updated 2026-10-20.
Informational only — NOT financial advice. All figures are delayed daily-close data from SEC EDGAR & market data, shown with their as-of date.