Skip to content

← 18 Aug 2026 · All rebalances

Short-term Top 10 — Real Estate — 24 Aug 2026

The ten as they stood on 24 Aug 2026. Scores, pillars and reasons are the ones recorded that day; nothing here is recomputed. Each bar is a percentile: how this company ranked against every company the score ranked, 0–100.

The short-term score is a published weighted sum of percentile ranks, rebalanced every Monday. A list is a published formula and its output, not a recommendation. Method version 3.

Get this list's changes by email

Who entered, who left, and the reason — with the score moves behind it.

Sign in to subscribe Subscriptions are available to signed-in accounts while email delivery is being set up.

Informational only — not financial advice. The daily email has not started yet — subscribing now puts you on the list for the first one. Unsubscribe in one click.

The ten

#CompanyWhy it was hereSectorScore
1 Americold (COLD)
Volume and participation 92nd: it gapped 9.2% above the previous close and has not traded back through the level it left behind — an "unfilled gap", which describes a price range no trade has since crossed and is not a forecast that it will be crossed.

Volume and participation 92nd: it gapped 9.2% above the previous close and has not traded back through the level it left behind — an "unfilled gap", which describes a price range no trade has since crossed and is not a forecast that it will be crossed; catalysts 67th: open-market insider buys in 90 days 16, analysts have raised their average price target by 0.4% since the prior reading; weakest is setup 54th: no Elliott-wave labelling currently fits its swings.

  • Trend54.2
  • Momentum56.5
  • Setup53.7
  • Volume and participation92.4
  • Catalysts67.2
Real Estate 62.9
2 CBRE Group (CBRE)
Setup 80th: day-to-day price swings are unusually narrow versus its own recent history — a "Bollinger squeeze" (in the tightest 3% of the past ~6 months), which often precedes a bigger move.

Setup 80th: day-to-day price swings are unusually narrow versus its own recent history — a "Bollinger squeeze" (in the tightest 3% of the past ~6 months), which often precedes a bigger move; catalysts 67th: analysts have raised their average price target by 0.6% since the prior reading; weakest is volume and participation 38th: trading volume is unusually light — only about 46% of its 30-day average.

  • Trend59.8
  • Momentum63.5
  • Setup79.5
  • Volume and participation37.6
  • Catalysts66.8
Real Estate 62.6
3 EPR Properties (EPR)
Volume and participation 93rd: trading volume is about normal versus its 30-day average.

Volume and participation 93rd: trading volume is about normal versus its 30-day average; catalysts 75th: open-market insider buys in 90 days 30, analysts have raised their average price target by 0.8% since the prior reading; weakest is momentum 39th: MACD momentum is negative.

  • Trend45.5
  • Momentum38.9
  • Setup72.1
  • Volume and participation93.4
  • Catalysts75.0
Real Estate 62.6
4 Jones Lang LaSalle (JLL)
Trend 77th: a strong uptrend, with buyers in control.

Trend 77th: a strong uptrend, with buyers in control; catalysts 72nd: analysts have raised their average price target by 2.9% since the prior reading; weakest is setup 34th: no Elliott-wave labelling currently fits its swings.

  • Trend77.4
  • Momentum69.1
  • Setup33.5
  • Volume and participation41.6
  • Catalysts72.3
Real Estate 60.6
5 Park Hotels & Resorts (PK)
Trend 68th: the price is 5% above the average price paid over the period covered, so the typical buyer over that stretch is showing a gain.

Trend 68th: the price is 5% above the average price paid over the period covered, so the typical buyer over that stretch is showing a gain; volume and participation 63rd: it gapped 3.6% above the previous close and has not traded back through the level it left behind — an "unfilled gap", which describes a price range no trade has since crossed and is not a forecast that it will be crossed; weakest is setup 47th: over the past year its closes ranged, and it has retraced essentially none of its move over the past year — 1% of it. It is heavily shorted, but it also meets the short-squeeze screen, so no deduction applies.

  • Trend67.7
  • Momentum63.0
  • Setup47.3
  • Volume and participation63.3
  • Catalysts57.1
Real Estate 59.9
6 SL GREEN REALTY REIT CORP (SLG)
Trend 78th: a strong uptrend, with buyers in control.

Trend 78th: a strong uptrend, with buyers in control; momentum 70th: MACD momentum is positive; weakest is catalysts 27th: the analyst consensus rating has softened toward "sell" since the prior reading. It is heavily shorted, but it also meets the short-squeeze screen, so no deduction applies.

  • Trend77.7
  • Momentum70.1
  • Setup55.9
  • Volume and participation63.4
  • Catalysts27.1
Real Estate 59.6
7 Equinix (EQIX)
Volume and participation 86th: trading volume is about normal versus its 30-day average.

Volume and participation 86th: trading volume is about normal versus its 30-day average; catalysts 70th: open-market insider buys in 90 days 18, analysts have raised their average price target by 0.6% since the prior reading; weakest is setup 44th: no Elliott-wave labelling currently fits its swings.

  • Trend48.6
  • Momentum58.5
  • Setup43.9
  • Volume and participation85.8
  • Catalysts70.1
Real Estate 59.5
8 LTC PROPERTIES REIT INC (LTC)
Catalysts 79th: the analyst consensus rating has improved toward "buy" since the prior reading.

Catalysts 79th: the analyst consensus rating has improved toward "buy" since the prior reading; trend 62nd: a "golden cross" — its 50-day average is above its 200-day; weakest is volume and participation 47th: trading volume is about normal versus its 30-day average.

  • Trend61.7
  • Momentum53.7
  • Setup50.5
  • Volume and participation46.8
  • Catalysts78.6
Real Estate 59.0
9 COMPASS INC CLASS A (COMP)
Setup 82nd: day-to-day price swings are unusually narrow versus its own recent history — a "Bollinger squeeze" (in the tightest 9% of the past ~6 months), which often precedes a bigger move.

Setup 82nd: day-to-day price swings are unusually narrow versus its own recent history — a "Bollinger squeeze" (in the tightest 9% of the past ~6 months), which often precedes a bigger move; catalysts 70th: open-market insider buys in 90 days 19, analysts have raised their average price target by 0.5% since the prior reading; weakest is trend 36th: the price is 8% below the average price paid over the period covered, so the typical buyer over that stretch is under water.

  • Trend35.5
  • Momentum61.3
  • Setup82.3
  • Volume and participation46.1
  • Catalysts70.0
Real Estate 58.5
10 APPLE HOSPITALITY REIT INC (APLE)
Catalysts 83rd: the analyst consensus rating has improved toward "buy" since the prior reading.

Catalysts 83rd: the analyst consensus rating has improved toward "buy" since the prior reading; momentum 63rd: its RSI momentum gauge is in neutral territory; weakest is setup 27th: no fresh 20-day breakout up or down.

  • Trend59.1
  • Momentum62.9
  • Setup26.9
  • Volume and participation47.1
  • Catalysts83.4
Real Estate 56.5

Entered on 24 Aug 2026

LTC PROPERTIES REIT INC (LTC) — Entered 24 Aug 2026: score 59.0, rank 8 (not compared with 18 Aug 2026 — those rows were scored under method version 1, this pass under 3, and the formula changed between them, so a score is only comparable within one version).

APPLE HOSPITALITY REIT INC (APLE) — Entered 24 Aug 2026: score 56.5, rank 10 (not compared with 18 Aug 2026 — those rows were scored under method version 1, this pass under 3, and the formula changed between them, so a score is only comparable within one version).

Left on 24 Aug 2026

American Homes 4 Rent (AMH) — Left 24 Aug 2026: score 51.5, rank 23 (not compared with 18 Aug 2026 — those rows were scored under method version 1, this pass under 3, and the formula changed between them, so a score is only comparable within one version) (a member leaves above rank 15).

LXP INDUSTRIAL TRUST (LXP) — Left 24 Aug 2026: score 40.6, rank 59 (not compared with 18 Aug 2026 — those rows were scored under method version 1, this pass under 3, and the formula changed between them, so a score is only comparable within one version) (a member leaves above rank 15).

See every rebalance of this list →

Informational only — NOT financial advice.

Research stocks in your own words.

Informational only — NOT financial advice.

ScreenersBlogPrivacyiOS app