LXP INDUSTRIAL TRUST (LXP)
Real Estate · Industrial REITs · NYSE
LXP Industrial Trust is a real estate investment trust specializing in the ownership and operation of single-tenant warehouse and distribution industrial properties.
What LXP INDUSTRIAL TRUST does
LXP Industrial Trust is a real estate investment trust (REIT) focused on the acquisition, development, ownership, and operation of single-tenant warehouse and distribution industrial properties. The company seeks to provide stable income by leasing these facilities to tenants under long-term net leases. Its portfolio consists primarily of light industrial and distribution assets located in strategic industrial markets throughout the United States.
Themes: industrial real estate, logistics infrastructure, net lease real estate
Fundamentals
- Price$60.90 as of 2026-08-21 close
- Market cap$3.6B as of 2026-08-21
- 1-year return+42.1% 2025-08-21 close $42.85 → 2026-08-21 close $60.90
- P/E55.13 as of 2026-08-24
- Net margin+18.7% as of 2026-08-24
- Gross margin+82.5% as of 2026-08-24
- ROE+3.2% as of 2026-08-24
- Debt / equity0.70 as of 2026-08-24
- Revenue growth (YoY)-4.2% as of 2026-08-24
- Revenue CAGR (3y)+2.9% SEC XBRL
- Beta1.06 as of 2026-08-24
- Last reported earnings2026-07-29 SEC EDGAR Form 8-K (Item 2.02)
Dividend: yield +6.1%; at least 5 years of non-decreasing per-share dividends (SEC XBRL) — we do not hold the year before it, so the real streak may be longer.
How LXP compares in its sector
- price-to-earnings ratiotop 25% 127 covered Real Estate peers, as of 2026-08-24
- net profit marginmiddle range 161 covered Real Estate peers, as of 2026-08-24
- operating marginmiddle range 161 covered Real Estate peers, as of 2026-08-24
- gross margintop 25% 156 covered Real Estate peers, as of 2026-08-24
- return on equitymiddle range 162 covered Real Estate peers, as of 2026-08-24
- 3-year revenue CAGRmiddle range 155 covered Real Estate peers
- indicated dividend yieldmiddle range 138 covered Real Estate peers, as of 2026-08-24
Position among covered Real Estate companies that report each metric (minimum 5 peers). A relative position within our covered catalog — not a valuation, quality, or investment judgment. A higher percentile is simply a higher value (for P/E, more expensive on earnings — never "better"). Informational only.
Top 10 scores & list membership
LXP is in the Real Estate Short-term Top 10.
Real Estate Short-term Top 10 — since 18 Aug 2026
Long-term score
51.2 #449 of 987 scored · #40 of 84 in Real Estate
Long-term trend 87th (a strong uptrend, with buyers in control) and capital return 71st (consecutive years of dividend increases 5 years); weakest is profitability (22nd, return on equity 3.2%, operating margin 11.1%).
Short-term score
53.3 #584 of 1,704 scored · #16 of 94 in Real Estate
Trend 74th: a strong uptrend, with buyers in control; setup 52nd: day-to-day price swings are unusually narrow versus its own recent history — a "Bollinger squeeze" (in the tightest 2% of the past ~6 months), which often precedes a bigger move; weakest is volume and participation 40th: trading volume is unusually light — only about 50% of its 30-day average.
In this list since 18 Aug 2026 — currently 10th in the list (3 days)
- Entered 18 Aug 2026: first selection for this list at rank 5, score 61.1.
Scores as of 21 Aug 2026. Each bar is a percentile: how this company ranked against every company the score ranked, 0–100. A list is a published formula and its output, not a recommendation. Method version 2.
Dividend coverage (FY2025)
Exceeded at least one reported measure. In FY2025, LXP's dividend exceeded at least one reported measure of what it earned or generated (earnings payout 145%, operating-cash-flow payout 87%). A payout above 100% in one year is not necessarily unsustainable, but it is not fully covered by that measure.
- Earnings payout145% dividends / net income
- Operating-cash-flow payout87% dividends / operating cash flow — capital spending was not reported, so this does not subtract it
Coverage derived from reported SEC EDGAR XBRL figures for FY2025 (dividends paid vs. net income and free cash flow, same fiscal year). This describes PAST coverage for one fiscal year — it does not predict whether a dividend will be maintained, raised, or cut, and a one-year payout ratio can be distorted by non-recurring items. Informational only — not financial advice.
How LXP INDUSTRIAL TRUST looks technically
LXP INDUSTRIAL TRUST (LXP) is trading 18.3% above its 200-day average, the long-term trend line — a longer-term uptrend. Its 50-day average crossed above its 200-day average about 234 trading days ago — a "golden cross", a bullish long-term signal. A strong uptrend is in place — ADX, a 0–100 trend-strength gauge, is 47, with buyers in control. Momentum is neutral — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 69, neither overbought (above 70) nor oversold (below 30). It just made a new 20-day high, its first since 2026-07-22, pushing above its recent trading range. It is 0.6% below its 52-week high (its highest price of the past year). Day-to-day price swings are unusually narrow versus its own recent history — a "Bollinger squeeze" (in the tightest 2% of the past ~6 months), which often precedes a bigger move. Trading volume is unusually light — only about 50% of its 30-day average.
Trend
8
| Distance from the 200-day | it is trading 18.3% above its 200-day average, the long-term trend line — a longer-term uptrend | +18.3% |
|---|---|---|
| 50-day moving average | its average price over the last 50 trading days — a short-term trend line — is $57.76 | $57.76 |
| 200-day moving average | its average price over the last 200 trading days — the long-term trend line — is $51.47 | $51.47 |
| Swing structure | each recent peak has been higher than the one before it and each dip has been shallower — the pattern chart-watchers call an uptrend, which describes where price has already been and not where it goes next | higher highs and higher lows |
| Last swing turn | its last significant turn was a swing high 30 calendar days ago — the swings before that are what the structure reading is measured on | 30 sessions |
| Wave structure | its recent swings can be read as a five-part upward sequence — what Elliott-wave chartists call an impulse — now in the fourth leg, a pullback against that upward direction; the labelling fails if price closes below 52.7925. It is one of several labellings that fit, and it describes the swings already printed, not what comes next. The same swings also read as a completed three-part correction. | possible upward five-wave sequence, in wave 4 (one of several readings) |
| Since the 50/200 cross | its 50-day average crossed above its 200-day average about 234 trading days ago — a "golden cross", a bullish long-term signal | 234 sessions |
| Trend strength (14-day ADX) | a strong uptrend is in place — ADX, a 0–100 trend-strength gauge, is 47, with buyers in control | 46.5 |
Momentum
3
| 14-day RSI | momentum is neutral — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 69, neither overbought (above 70) nor oversold (below 30) | 68.8 |
|---|---|---|
| Position in its 14-day range | it is trading in the upper half of its 14-day range ($60.42 to $61.09) — its "stochastic" reading is 72 out of 100, where 0 would mean closing exactly at the 14-session low and 100 exactly at the high. This measures WHERE the price sits inside its recent range, which is a different question from the RSI beside it: RSI is a momentum gauge, measuring how FAST the price has been moving, so a stock can drift quietly to the bottom of its range with an ordinary RSI, or fall sharply and still sit in the middle. It has been slipping within that range over the last few sessions. | 71.6 |
| Since the MACD crossed zero | MACD, a trend-momentum gauge, is in negative territory (momentum leaning bearish) | 15 sessions |
Range
12
| 52-week high | its highest closing price over the past year (about 252 trading days) was $61.28 | $61.28 |
|---|---|---|
| From the 52-week high | it is 0.6% below its 52-week high (its highest price of the past year) | -0.6% |
| Above the 52-week low | it is 46.6% above its 52-week low (its lowest price of the past year) | +46.6% |
| Below the 52-week high | it is at or near its highest point of the past year | 0.6% |
| Since a 20-day breakout | it just made a new 20-day high, its first since 2026-07-22, pushing above its recent trading range | 1 session |
| Since a 55-day breakout | it made a new 55-day high about 24 trading days ago | 24 sessions |
| All-time high | its highest closing price on record is $120.29 (set on 2005-07-12) | $120.29 |
| Given back of the 52-week move | over the past year its closes ranged ($42.85 to $61.15), and it has given back essentially none of its rise from last year’s low — 1% of it. Chart-watchers call 61.8%-65% given back the "golden pocket" — for this company that is $49.26 to $49.84. It is watched widely enough that orders cluster there, which is the honest reason it matters; it is not a forecast. | 1.4% |
| From the all-time high | it is 49.4% below its all-time high | -49.4% |
| Nearest price level | it is sitting right on a support level at $60.74 — a price it turned at three times since 2026-07-22, most recently on 2026-08-14. Since 2024-08-21 it has 13 such levels below the current price and 0 above. Levels like these describe where the price has reversed or paused before; they are not a forecast of where it will go. | -0.3% |
| All-time low | its lowest closing price on record is $9.19 (set on 2009-03-09) | $9.19 |
| Above the all-time low | it is 562.6% above its all-time low | +562.6% |
Volatility
5
| Band width vs its own 6 months | day-to-day price swings are unusually narrow versus its own recent history — a "Bollinger squeeze" (in the tightest 2% of the past ~6 months), which often precedes a bigger move | 2nd percentile |
|---|---|---|
| Typical daily range | in a typical session it travels about $0.4097 between its high and its low — about 0.7% of its price. That is its "average true range" over the last 14 sessions, which also counts the distance from the previous close, so a day that opens well away from yesterday counts as the large move it was | $0.4097 |
| Bollinger bands (20-day, ±2σ) | most of its recent trading has stayed between about $60.42 and $60.92 — the "Bollinger bands", a range drawn two standard deviations either side of its 20-day average price, which widens when the stock gets more volatile and narrows when it settles | $60.42 – $60.67 – $60.92 |
| Typical daily range (% of price) | its price moves about 0.7% in a typical session — among the calmest in the catalog. This is the average gap between a session's high and low over the last 14 sessions, counting overnight moves, expressed against the current price so it can be compared with companies trading at any price | 0.7% |
| Stretch from the 200-day average | it is trading 23.0 daily ranges above its 200-day average price (18.3% above it in plain percentage terms) — a way of asking how far it has stretched from its own average in units of how far it normally moves in a day, so a calm company and a jumpy one can be compared on the same scale. Read that multiple with care: this company's daily range is unusually small (about 0.7% of its price), which is what makes the multiple large — a stock trading in a narrow band near a takeover price does this | 23.0 daily ranges above its 200-day average |
Volume
1
| Volume vs its 30-day average | trading volume is unusually light — only about 50% of its 30-day average | 0.50× |
|---|
Analyst
2
| Change in the average price target | analysts' average price target is unchanged from the prior reading | 0.0% |
|---|---|---|
| Change in the consensus rating | the analyst consensus rating is unchanged since the prior reading | unchanged |
Candlestick patterns
1
| Since a doji | 7 sessions ago it opened and closed at almost the same price after trading through a wider range — a "doji", the classic picture of buyers and sellers finishing the session level | 7 sessions ago |
|---|
Price gaps
2
| Open gap | it gapped 3.9% above the previous close 24 sessions ago and has not traded back through the level it left behind at 58.51 — an "unfilled gap", which describes a price range no trade has since crossed and is not a forecast that it will be crossed | +3.9% |
|---|---|---|
| Gap filled | a 2.2% gap down opened on 2026-06-30 has been "filled" 36 sessions ago — price traded back through the level the gap left behind, and it took 1 session to close | 36 sessions ago |
Price streaks
1
| Closing streak | it has closed higher 3 sessions in a row, a +0.54% move over the run — an unbroken run of up days, which describes what has already happened and says nothing about the next session | 3 sessions up |
|---|
Relative strength
4
| vs market, 1 month | over the past 1 month this stock lagged the market by 2.7 percentage points (the stock lost 0.4% while the market gained 2.3%) | -2.7% |
|---|---|---|
| vs market, 3 months | over the past 3 months this stock beat the market by 14.0 percentage points (the stock gained 17.1% while the market gained 3.1%) | +14.0% |
| vs market, 6 months | over the past 6 months this stock beat the market by 15.0 percentage points (the stock gained 26.1% while the market gained 11.1%) | +15.0% |
| vs market, 12 months | over the past 12 months this stock beat the market by 21.6 percentage points (the stock gained 42.1% while the market gained 20.5%) | +21.6% |
Signal agreement
2
| Bullish technical signals | 6 of the 9 technical signals we can compute for it are currently in a bullish state: a strong uptrend, with buyers in control, a "golden cross" — its 50-day average is above its 200-day, trading above its 200-day average, a fresh 20-day high, outperforming the market over 6 months, trading above the Ichimoku cloud — these describe past price behaviour, not a forecast | 6 of 9 |
|---|---|---|
| Bearish technical signals | 1 of the 9 technical signals we can compute for it is currently in a bearish state: MACD momentum is negative — these describe past price behaviour, not a forecast | 1 of 9 |
Trend (Ichimoku cloud)
1
| Vs the Ichimoku cloud | trading 9.5% above the Ichimoku cloud — a band drawn from where its own highs and lows sat up to 2026-07-16 and projected forward over today's price, the side traders read as an established uptrend, with the band below acting as the level that would have to give way. The band itself is moderate, spanning 2.9% of the share price. | +9.5% |
|---|
Volume-weighted price
2
| Vs this year’s average price paid | the price is 15% above the average price paid so far this year, so the typical buyer over that stretch is showing a gain. That average is $53.08 — a volume-weighted average of daily closes over 158 sessions, not a true tick-by-tick VWAP. | +14.7% |
|---|---|---|
| Vs the average paid since it last reported | the price is sitting right on the average price paid since it last reported on 2026-07-29 (its 10-Q), so the typical buyer over that stretch is roughly break-even. That average is $60.64 — a volume-weighted average of daily closes over 18 sessions, not a true tick-by-tick VWAP. | +0.4% |
Price levels it has turned at before
LXP last closed at $60.90 on 2026-08-21. Since 2024-08-21 it has turned at 13 prices below its last close and 0 above; the 3 nearest below are listed, nearest first.
| Level | Side | Distance | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| $60.74 | Support | 0.3% below the last close | turned there three times · 2026-07-22 to 2026-08-14 |
| $54.63 | Support | 10.3% below the last close | turned there twice · 2026-06-16 to 2026-07-13 |
| $52.44 | Support | 13.9% below the last close | turned there five times · 2024-09-04 to 2026-05-07 |
A level is a price this company reversed or paused at more than once — they describe past behaviour, not a forecast of where the price will go.
Wave structure
Its recent swings can be read as a five-part upward sequence — what Elliott-wave chartists call an impulse — now in leg 4 of five, a pullback against that direction.
This labelling fails — stops being a possible reading at all — if it closes below $52.79.
This is one of several labellings that fit the same swings, so treat it as a reading rather than the reading. It was chosen from 2 labellings that survived the rules, counting shorter readings of the same bars.
On past moves of this shape the leg has usually ended somewhere between $55.62 and $58.61 — that is where it has tended to end if the count holds, not a forecast of where the price goes.
Alternate reading: The same swings also read as a completed three-part correction, which fails on a close above $61.28.
This labelling was already in place when we began recording count changes on 2026-08-13, so how long it has stood is not something we can say yet.
Read from daily closes as of 2026-08-21.
An Elliott-wave count describes the swings already printed and the level that would disprove it. It is not a forecast, a target, or advice.
Screens: Trading above the 200-day moving average · Near the 52-week high · Broke out to a new 20-day high · in a Bollinger Band volatility squeeze · in a strong, established uptrend (ADX) · beating the market | Learn: moving average · golden cross · adx · rsi · breakout · fifty two week high low · bollinger bands · volume and relative volume
Based on daily closing prices as of 2026-08-21. Describes past price behavior only — informational, not financial advice.
Analyst consensus
- Consensus ratingBuy (2.38 mean, 1=Strong Buy…5=Strong Sell) — 5 analysts
- Mean price target$60.00 range $56.00 – $65.00; median $61.00
Analyst estimates, as of 2026-08-22. These are third-party analyst opinions and price targets, aggregated — not a recommendation, prediction, or advice from stocks-llm. Informational only.
Key risks (from latest filing)
["Reliance on single-tenant leases creates significant exposure to individual tenant credit risk and lease rollover/vacancy risk.","The company’s ability to grow depends on capital availability and its ability to successfully execute development and acquisition projects in competitive industrial markets."]
What changed in the latest 10-Q
AI-assisted comparison of LXP's 10-Q filed 2026-04-29 against the prior one filed 2025-10-30.
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
- Added:
- Newer filing (2026-04-29) adds disclosure that reverse split occurred effective November 10, 2025 where each common share reclassified into 1/5th of a common share, and states all common share amounts are presented on a reclassified basis
- Newer filing (2026-04-29) modifies definition of 'Stabilized Portfolio' to specify properties that have achieved 90% occupancy 'of the property' with clearer language structure
- Newer filing (2026-04-29) adds statement that terms 'FFO,' 'Adjusted Company FFO,' and 'NOI' are defined 'in Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in Part I, Item 2 of this Quarterly Report' rather than 'below'
- Newer filing (2026-04-29) adds reference to Annual Report filed February 12, 2026 instead of February 13, 2025
- Newer filing (2026-04-29) updates Overview section to report 108 consolidated properties as of March 31, 2026 versus 112 as of September 30, 2025
- Newer filing (2026-04-29) updates Overview to report 14 states instead of 15 states
- Newer filing (2026-04-29) updates Overview to report 52.7 million square feet instead of 54.2 million square feet
- Newer filing (2026-04-29) updates Overview occupancy to 96.6% as of March 31, 2026 versus 96.8% as of September 30, 2025
- Newer filing (2026-04-29) replaces 'Third Quarter 2025 Transaction Summary' with 'First Quarter 2026 Transaction Summary'
- Newer filing (2026-04-29) reports 1.8 million square feet of new leases and lease extensions with 19.1% base rent increase and 11.9% cash base rent increase in Q1 2026
- Newer filing (2026-04-29) reports commencement of 1.2 million square foot speculative development project in Phoenix, Arizona
- Newer filing (2026-04-29) reports extension of $600 million unsecured revolving credit facility and $250 million term loan with reduced pricing
- Newer filing (2026-04-29) reports repurchase and retirement of 0.3 million common shares at average price of $48.70 per share
- Removed:
- Older filing (2025-10-30) contained disclosure of new tax legislation effective July 4, 2025 regarding qualified REIT dividends, TRS asset test percentage limit, and interest deduction limit changes - this section is removed in newer filing
- Older filing (2025-10-30) reported 'three and nine months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024' in introduction; newer filing changes to 'three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025'
- Older filing (2025-10-30) defined Series C Preferred Shares as '6.50% Series C Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock'; newer filing removes 'Cumulative' descriptor
- Older filing (2025-10-30) contained specific Q3 2025 transaction details including lease extension of 0.5 million square feet at $5.80 vs $5.35 per square foot - removed in newer filing
- Older filing (2025-10-30) reported disposition of five facilities for $198.3 million - not reported in newer filing
- Reworded:
- Introduction wording changed from 'when we use the terms the Company' to 'Unless stated otherwise...the Company' for consistency
- Introduction changed from 'real estate investment trust' to full definition including reference to Internal Revenue Code of 1986
- Definition of Stabilized Portfolio restructured: older version stated 'all real estate properties other than non-stabilized properties' versus newer version explicitly states 'all real estate properties that have achieved 90% occupancy...or...one-year from cessation of major construction activities'
- Older filing stated terms 'FFO,' 'Adjusted Company FFO,' and 'NOI' are 'defined below' versus newer filing states they are 'defined in Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in Part I, Item 2 of this Quarterly Report'
- Notes:
- Both filings are quarterly reports but cover different periods (Q1 2026 vs Q3 2025), which explains portfolio size and occupancy differences
- The reverse split disclosure in newer filing is a procedural change that affects share presentation rather than operational substance
- Removal of tax legislation disclosure in newer filing reflects that legislation was covered in prior period and may not need repetition in subsequent quarterly report
Risk Factors
The two filings could not be meaningfully compared for this section.
AI-assisted comparison of two SEC filing sections. It describes wording and theme changes only, makes no materiality, legal, or investment judgement, and is not financial advice. Informational only — not financial advice.
Insider activity (SEC Form 4)
No open-market insider purchases or sales are on record for LXP — recent Form 4 activity was compensation-related (awards, option exercises, or tax withholding), not open-market buying or selling.
View full insider trading history → View SEC Form 3/4/5 filingsOnly open-market purchases (SEC code P) and sales (code S) are counted here. Option exercises, vesting/awards, gifts, and shares withheld for taxes are excluded — they are compensation or mechanical, not open-market conviction. Sales may be planned and non-discretionary (e.g. a Rule 10b5-1 plan) and are not necessarily bearish; open-market buying is not a recommendation to buy. Informational only — not financial advice.
Congressional trading disclosures
U.S. House members publicly disclose their own, their spouse's, and dependent children's stock transactions under the STOCK Act. We hold 2 matched disclosures for LXP from U.S. House Clerk Periodic Transaction Report filings.
Congressional trading disclosures →Short interest (FINRA)
LXP had 1,332,227 shares of reported short interest as of the 2026-07-31 FINRA settlement date (delayed, bi-monthly; not real-time).
LXP had 2.26% of its shares outstanding sold short as of the 2026-07-31 FINRA settlement date (percent of FLOAT would be higher — float is not disclosed in the source). FINRA reported 1.25 days to cover at the same settlement.
- Reported short interest (shares) 1,332,227
- Short interest (% of shares outstanding) 2.26%
- Prior settlement (shares) 1,517,093
- Reported change -12.19%
- Days to cover (reported) 1.25
Reported to FINRA as of the 2026-07-31 settlement date. Short interest is reported to FINRA and published on a delayed, bi-monthly schedule (as of a settlement date, disseminated roughly eight business days later) — it is NOT real-time, does not cover every venue or all US trading, and is not a short-squeeze prediction or investment advice. Days-to-cover is the value FINRA reports; percent of float is not shown because the source file carries no share-count denominator — where a percent appears it is of shares OUTSTANDING, the larger base, and is therefore a floor on percent of float. Informational only — not financial advice.
Competitors & peers
- Prologis (PLD)
- Rexford Industrial Realty (REXR)
- EastGroup Properties (EGP)
- STAG Industrial (STAG)
- First Industrial Realty Trust (FR)
AI-enriched competitor set. Linked names are companies covered by stocks-llm; other named peers are shown for reference only.
Compare LXP vs…
LXP INDUSTRIAL TRUST is found in…
Frequently asked questions
What does LXP INDUSTRIAL TRUST (LXP) do?
LXP Industrial Trust is a real estate investment trust (REIT) focused on the acquisition, development, ownership, and operation of single-tenant warehouse and distribution industrial properties. The company seeks to provide stable income by leasing these facilities to tenants under long-term net leases. Its portfolio consists primarily of light industrial and distribution assets located in strategic industrial markets throughout the United States.
What sector is LXP INDUSTRIAL TRUST (LXP) in?
LXP INDUSTRIAL TRUST (LXP) is classified in the Real Estate sector. Its industry is Industrial REITs. It trades on NYSE.
Does LXP pay a dividend?
Yes — LXP INDUSTRIAL TRUST (LXP) pays a dividend, with an indicated yield of about 6.11% and at least 5 years of non-decreasing per-share dividends (SEC EDGAR XBRL) — we do not hold the year before it, so the real streak may be longer (market data, as of 2026-08-24). Informational only — not financial advice.
Who are LXP INDUSTRIAL TRUST's (LXP) competitors?
Notable peers of LXP INDUSTRIAL TRUST (LXP) include Prologis, Rexford Industrial Realty, EastGroup Properties, STAG Industrial and First Industrial Realty Trust. This peer set is informational only — not financial advice.
Has there been recent Congressional stock trading in LXP?
Yes — we hold 2 matched STOCK Act disclosures for LXP from U.S. House Clerk Periodic Transaction Report filings. These are legally-required disclosures (often filed 30–45 days after the trade), may belong to a U.S. House member, their spouse, or a dependent child, and are not an indicator of company performance or investment advice.
Is LXP INDUSTRIAL TRUST (LXP) overbought or oversold right now?
LXP INDUSTRIAL TRUST (LXP) is currently neither overbought nor oversold — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 69, in the neutral middle (as of 2026-08-21). RSI describes recent price momentum, not a forecast — informational only, not financial advice.
Where does stocks-llm's data on LXP come from?
Fundamentals and prices come from market data, as of 2026-08-24; company filings and profile facts come from SEC EDGAR. All figures are delayed daily-close data shown with their as-of date — informational only, not financial advice.
Fundamentals: market data, as of 2026-08-24. Filings: SEC EDGAR. Prices are delayed daily-close data.
Last updated 2026-08-21.
Informational only — NOT financial advice. All figures are delayed daily-close data from SEC EDGAR & market data, shown with their as-of date.