Brookfield Asset Management (BAM)
Financials · alternative asset management · NYSE
A global alternative asset manager focused on real assets and credit, providing institutional-grade investment strategies to investors worldwide.
What Brookfield Asset Management does
Brookfield Asset Management is a leading global alternative asset manager focused on real assets and credit strategies. The company manages a vast portfolio of capital across infrastructure, renewable power, real estate, private equity, and credit for institutional and retail investors. It operates as a pure-play asset manager with significant fee-bearing capital.
Themes: alternative investments, infrastructure investment, renewable energy transition, private credit, insurance capital management, real estate investment
Fundamentals
- Price$52.30 as of 2026-08-21 close
- Market cap$91.5B as of 2026-08-24
- 1-year return-11.4% 2025-08-21 close $59.01 → 2026-08-21 close $52.30
- P/E32.62 as of 2026-08-24
- Net margin+50.0% as of 2026-08-24
- ROE+33.6% as of 2026-08-24
- Debt / equity0.58 as of 2026-08-24
- Revenue growth (YoY)+21.0% FY2025 vs FY2024, SEC XBRL
- Revenue CAGR (3y)+8.9% SEC XBRL
- Beta1.61 as of 2026-08-24
- Last reported earnings2026-08-06 SEC EDGAR Form 8-K (Item 2.02)
Dividend: yield +3.8%; at least 2 years of non-decreasing per-share dividends (SEC XBRL) — we do not hold the year before it, so the real streak may be longer.
How BAM compares in its sector
- price-to-earnings ratiotop 25% 525 covered Financials peers, as of 2026-08-24
- net profit margintop 10% 538 covered Financials peers, as of 2026-08-24
- operating margintop 10% 534 covered Financials peers, as of 2026-08-24
- return on equitytop 10% 575 covered Financials peers, as of 2026-08-24
- 3-year revenue CAGRmiddle range 347 covered Financials peers
- indicated dividend yieldmiddle range 453 covered Financials peers, as of 2026-08-24
Position among covered Financials companies that report each metric (minimum 5 peers). A relative position within our covered catalog — not a valuation, quality, or investment judgment. A higher percentile is simply a higher value (for P/E, more expensive on earnings — never "better"). Informational only.
Top 10 scores & list membership
BAM is not currently in any published Top 10 list. Its scores are below.
Long-term score
55.3 #313 of 987 scored · #126 of 191 in Financials
Profitability 91st (operating margin 61.6%, return on equity 33.6%) and financial health 77th (free cash flow margin 41.3%, debt to equity 0.6); weakest is valuation (12th, price to earnings 30.2, price to book 10.6).
Short-term score
47.6 #940 of 1,704 scored · #169 of 277 in Financials
Momentum 57th: its RSI momentum gauge is in neutral territory; trend 53rd: a strong uptrend, with buyers in control; weakest is catalysts 33rd: open-market insider buys in 90 days 0, analysts' average price target is unchanged from the prior reading.
Scores as of 21 Aug 2026. Each bar is a percentile: how this company ranked against every company the score ranked, 0–100. A list is a published formula and its output, not a recommendation. Method version 2.
Dividend coverage (FY2025)
Exceeded at least one reported measure. In FY2025, BAM's dividend exceeded at least one reported measure of what it earned or generated (earnings payout 118%, operating-cash-flow payout 134%). A payout above 100% in one year is not necessarily unsustainable, but it is not fully covered by that measure.
- Earnings payout118% dividends / net income
- Operating-cash-flow payout134% dividends / operating cash flow — capital spending was not reported, so this does not subtract it
Coverage derived from reported SEC EDGAR XBRL figures for FY2025 (dividends paid vs. net income and free cash flow, same fiscal year). This describes PAST coverage for one fiscal year — it does not predict whether a dividend will be maintained, raised, or cut, and a one-year payout ratio can be distorted by non-recurring items. Informational only — not financial advice.
How Brookfield Asset Management looks technically
Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) is trading 6.2% above its 200-day average, the long-term trend line — a longer-term uptrend. Its 50-day average crossed below its 200-day average about 187 trading days ago — a "death cross", a bearish long-term signal. A strong uptrend is in place — ADX, a 0–100 trend-strength gauge, is 29, with buyers in control. Momentum is neutral — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 55, neither overbought (above 70) nor oversold (below 30). MACD, a trend-momentum gauge, turned bearish about 3 trading days ago (its momentum flipped negative). It made a new 20-day high about 7 trading days ago. It is 16.4% below its highest point of the past year.
Trend
9
| Distance from the 200-day | it is trading 6.2% above its 200-day average, the long-term trend line — a longer-term uptrend | +6.2% |
|---|---|---|
| 50-day moving average | its average price over the last 50 trading days — a short-term trend line — is $48.66 | $48.66 |
| 200-day moving average | its average price over the last 200 trading days — the long-term trend line — is $49.26 | $49.26 |
| Swing structure | each recent peak has been higher than the one before it and each dip has been shallower — the pattern chart-watchers call an uptrend, which describes where price has already been and not where it goes next | higher highs and higher lows |
| Last swing turn | its last significant turn was a swing high 8 calendar days ago — the swings before that are what the structure reading is measured on | 8 sessions |
| Wave structure | its recent swings can be read as a five-part upward sequence — what Elliott-wave chartists call an impulse — now in the fourth leg, a pullback against that upward direction; the labelling fails if price closes below 49.57. It is one of several labellings that fit, and it describes the swings already printed, not what comes next. The same swings also read as a completed three-part correction. | possible upward five-wave sequence, in wave 4 (one of several readings) |
| Since the 50/200 cross | its 50-day average crossed below its 200-day average about 187 trading days ago — a "death cross", a bearish long-term signal | 187 sessions |
| Above the 200-day after a dip | it recently dipped to its 200-day average (the long-term trend line) and has since climbed back above it — now about 6.2% above | +6.2% |
| Trend strength (14-day ADX) | a strong uptrend is in place — ADX, a 0–100 trend-strength gauge, is 29, with buyers in control | 29.0 |
Momentum
3
| 14-day RSI | momentum is neutral — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 55, neither overbought (above 70) nor oversold (below 30) | 54.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Position in its 14-day range | it is trading in the lower half of its 14-day range ($50.37 to $55.98) — its "stochastic" reading is 34 out of 100, where 0 would mean closing exactly at the 14-session low and 100 exactly at the high. This measures WHERE the price sits inside its recent range, which is a different question from the RSI beside it: RSI is a momentum gauge, measuring how FAST the price has been moving, so a stock can drift quietly to the bottom of its range with an ordinary RSI, or fall sharply and still sit in the middle. It has been slipping within that range over the last few sessions. | 34.4 |
| Since the MACD crossed zero | MACD, a trend-momentum gauge, turned bearish about 3 trading days ago (its momentum flipped negative) | 3 sessions |
Range
12
| 52-week high | its highest closing price over the past year (about 252 trading days) was $62.57 | $62.57 |
|---|---|---|
| From the 52-week high | it is 16.4% below its 52-week high (its highest price of the past year) | -16.4% |
| Above the 52-week low | it is 23.9% above its 52-week low (its lowest price of the past year) | +23.9% |
| Below the 52-week high | it is 16.4% below its highest point of the past year | 16.4% |
| Since a 20-day breakout | it made a new 20-day high about 7 trading days ago | 7 sessions |
| Since a 55-day breakout | it made a new 55-day high about 7 trading days ago | 7 sessions |
| All-time high | its highest closing price on record is $64.10 (set on 2025-08-06) | $64.10 |
| Given back of the 52-week move | over the past year its closes ranged ($42.87 to $61.46), and it has recovered around half of its fall from last year’s high — 51% of it. Chart-watchers call 61.8%-65% given back the "golden pocket" — for this company that is $54.36 to $54.95. It is watched widely enough that orders cluster there, which is the honest reason it matters; it is not a forecast. | 50.7% |
| From the all-time high | it is 18.4% below its all-time high | -18.4% |
| Nearest price level | it is trading 0.7% above a support level at $51.94 — a price it turned at three times since 2025-03-26, most recently on 2026-01-02. Since 2024-08-21 it has 6 such levels below the current price and 8 above. Levels like these describe where the price has reversed or paused before; they are not a forecast of where it will go. | -0.7% |
| All-time low | its lowest closing price on record is $26.76 (set on 2022-12-16) | $26.76 |
| Above the all-time low | it is 95.4% above its all-time low | +95.4% |
Volatility
5
| Band width vs its own 6 months | day-to-day price swings are unusually wide versus its own recent history (wider than about 87% of the past ~6 months) | 87th percentile |
|---|---|---|
| Typical daily range | in a typical session it travels about $1.49 between its high and its low — about 2.9% of its price. That is its "average true range" over the last 14 sessions, which also counts the distance from the previous close, so a day that opens well away from yesterday counts as the large move it was | $1.49 |
| Bollinger bands (20-day, ±2σ) | most of its recent trading has stayed between about $46.63 and $56.74 — the "Bollinger bands", a range drawn two standard deviations either side of its 20-day average price, which widens when the stock gets more volatile and narrows when it settles | $46.63 – $51.68 – $56.74 |
| Typical daily range (% of price) | its price moves about 2.9% in a typical session — calmer than most companies we cover. This is the average gap between a session's high and low over the last 14 sessions, counting overnight moves, expressed against the current price so it can be compared with companies trading at any price | 2.9% |
| Stretch from the 200-day average | it is trading 2.0 daily ranges above its 200-day average price (6.2% above it in plain percentage terms) — a way of asking how far it has stretched from its own average in units of how far it normally moves in a day, so a calm company and a jumpy one can be compared on the same scale | 2.0 daily ranges above its 200-day average |
Volume
1
| Volume vs its 30-day average | trading volume is about normal versus its 30-day average | 0.67× |
|---|
Analyst
2
| Change in the average price target | analysts' average price target is unchanged from the prior reading | 0.0% |
|---|---|---|
| Change in the consensus rating | the analyst consensus rating is unchanged since the prior reading | unchanged |
Candlestick patterns
1
| Since a doji | today it opened and closed at almost the same price after trading through a wider range — a "doji", the classic picture of buyers and sellers finishing the session level | today |
|---|
Price gaps
3
| Gap at the open | it opened on 2026-08-21 1.7% above the previous session's close — an overnight gap, the part of the move that happened while the market was shut, and had not traded back through that level by the close | +1.6% |
|---|---|---|
| Open gap | it gapped 3.2% above the previous close 19 sessions ago and has not traded back through the level it left behind at 45.71 — an "unfilled gap", which describes a price range no trade has since crossed and is not a forecast that it will be crossed | +3.1% |
| Gap filled | a 2.2% gap up opened on 2026-08-05 has been "filled" 12 sessions ago — price traded back through the level the gap left behind, and it closed again during the very session that opened it | 12 sessions ago |
Price streaks
1
| Closing streak | it closed higher in its latest session, after a session that did not close higher — a single up day rather than a run | 1 session up |
|---|
Relative strength
4
| vs market, 1 month | over the past 1 month this stock beat the market by 10.0 percentage points (the stock gained 12.4% while the market gained 2.3%) | +10.1% |
|---|---|---|
| vs market, 3 months | over the past 3 months this stock beat the market by 4.6 percentage points (the stock gained 7.7% while the market gained 3.1%) | +4.7% |
| vs market, 6 months | over the past 6 months this stock lagged the market by 7.6 percentage points (the stock gained 3.4% while the market gained 11.1%) | -7.6% |
| vs market, 12 months | over the past 12 months this stock lagged the market by 31.9 percentage points (the stock lost 11.4% while the market gained 20.5%) | -31.9% |
Signal agreement
2
| Bullish technical signals | 3 of the 9 technical signals we can compute for it are currently in a bullish state: a strong uptrend, with buyers in control, trading above its 200-day average, trading above the Ichimoku cloud — these describe past price behaviour, not a forecast | 3 of 9 |
|---|---|---|
| Bearish technical signals | 3 of the 9 technical signals we can compute for it are currently in a bearish state: a "death cross" — its 50-day average is below its 200-day, MACD momentum is negative, lagging the market over 6 months — these describe past price behaviour, not a forecast | 3 of 9 |
Trend (Ichimoku cloud)
1
| Vs the Ichimoku cloud | trading 11% above the Ichimoku cloud — a band drawn from where its own highs and lows sat up to 2026-07-15 and projected forward over today's price, the side traders read as an established uptrend, with the band below acting as the level that would have to give way. The band itself is thin, spanning 0.2% of the share price, which is taken to mean a barrier that gives way easily. | +11.3% |
|---|
Volume-weighted price
2
| Vs this year’s average price paid | the price is 9% above the average price paid so far this year, so the typical buyer over that stretch is showing a gain. That average is $48.08 — a volume-weighted average of daily closes over 159 sessions, not a true tick-by-tick VWAP. | +8.8% |
|---|---|---|
| Vs the average paid since it last reported | the price is 2% below the average price paid since it last reported on 2026-08-06 (its 8-K), so the typical buyer over that stretch is under water. That average is $53.63 — a volume-weighted average of daily closes over 12 sessions, not a true tick-by-tick VWAP. | -2.5% |
Price levels it has turned at before
BAM last closed at $52.30 on 2026-08-21. Since 2024-08-21 it has turned at 6 prices below its last close and 8 above; the 3 nearest below and the 3 nearest above are listed, nearest first.
| Level | Side | Distance | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| $51.94 | Support | 0.7% below the last close | turned there three times · 2025-03-26 to 2026-01-02 |
| $53.19 | Resistance | 1.7% above the last close | turned there five times · 2024-12-20 to 2026-02-12 |
| $50.02 | Support | 4.4% below the last close | turned there 7 times · 2025-01-13 to 2026-07-16 |
| $54.85 | Resistance | 4.9% above the last close | turned there 7 times · 2024-11-20 to 2026-01-06 |
| $55.95 | Resistance | 7.0% above the last close | turned there five times · 2025-01-08 to 2026-08-13 |
| $48.41 | Support | 7.4% below the last close | turned there twice · 2024-10-02 to 2025-11-18 |
A level is a price this company reversed or paused at more than once — they describe past behaviour, not a forecast of where the price will go.
Wave structure
Its recent swings can be read as a five-part upward sequence — what Elliott-wave chartists call an impulse — now in leg 4 of five, a pullback against that direction.
This labelling fails — stops being a possible reading at all — if it closes below $49.57.
This is one of several labellings that fit the same swings, so treat it as a reading rather than the reading. It was chosen from 2 labellings that survived the rules, counting shorter readings of the same bars.
On past moves of this shape the leg has usually ended somewhere between $50.67 and $53.47 — that is where it has tended to end if the count holds, not a forecast of where the price goes.
Alternate reading: The same swings also read as a completed three-part correction, which fails on a close above $55.98.
This reading has stood for 2 trading days, since 2026-08-20.
Read from daily closes as of 2026-08-21.
An Elliott-wave count describes the swings already printed and the level that would disprove it. It is not a forecast, a target, or advice.
Screens: Trading above the 200-day moving average · Tested and reclaimed 200-day support · MACD just crossed bearish (12/26/9) · in a strong, established uptrend (ADX) · lagging the market · Printed a doji candle | Learn: moving average · golden cross · adx · rsi · macd · breakout · fifty two week high low
Based on daily closing prices as of 2026-08-21. Describes past price behavior only — informational, not financial advice.
Analyst consensus
- Consensus ratingBuy (2.28 mean, 1=Strong Buy…5=Strong Sell) — 18 analysts
- Mean price target$57.19 range $44.00 – $70.00; median $55.50
Analyst estimates, as of 2026-08-18. These are third-party analyst opinions and price targets, aggregated — not a recommendation, prediction, or advice from stocks-llm. Informational only.
Analyst EPS estimate for BAM
- Consensus EPS estimate$0.4633 next reporting period, as of 2026-08-18
Change over time is not available yet: it needs two readings of the same reporting period at least 30 days apart, and we have been recording these estimates since 2026-08-04. An estimate for a DIFFERENT quarter is not a revision, so a reading from before the last report is never compared with one after it.
The consensus estimate for the next reporting period, and how it has moved between readings of that SAME period. A change is measured only between readings estimating one period — when a company reports, the consensus moves to the next quarter and the two numbers are not comparable. Informational only, not a forecast and not advice.
Key risks (from latest filing)
["Fluctuations in global economic conditions and market interest rates impacting capital deployment and asset valuations.","Dependence on maintaining and growing assets under management and the ability to raise new capital.","Operational and integration risks related to acquisitions of other asset management firms."]
What changed in the latest 10-Q
AI-assisted comparison of BAM's 10-Q filed 2026-05-08 against the prior one filed 2025-11-10.
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
- Added:
- Cash of consolidated funds $51M added to balance sheet (March 31, 2026)
- Due to affiliates of consolidated funds $63M added as liability (March 31, 2026)
- Redeemable non-controlling interest in consolidated funds $1,384M added to balance sheet (March 31, 2026)
- Property, plant and equipment line item added to balance sheet with $93M (March 31, 2026)
- Intangible assets line item added to balance sheet with $229M (March 31, 2026)
- Goodwill line item added to balance sheet with $236M (March 31, 2026)
- Realized carried interest allocations $16M added to investment income (Q1 2026)
- Unrealized carried interest allocations revenue $96M added to investment income (Q1 2026)
- Interest and dividend revenue of consolidated funds $8M added (Q1 2026)
- Other revenues increased to $207M from prior period $105M comparison
- Realized carried interest allocation compensation $22M added as expense (Q1 2026)
- Unrealized carried interest allocation compensation $189M added as expense (Q1 2026)
- Interest expense of consolidated funds $10M added (Q1 2026)
- Redeemable non-controlling interest in consolidated funds $6M added to net income attribution (Q1 2026)
- Non-controlling interests in consolidated funds $5M added to net income attribution (Q1 2026)
- Non-controlling interest in consolidated funds comprehensive income $5M added (Q1 2026)
- Removed:
- Investments held for sale line item removed from balance sheet (was $0 at September 30, 2025)
- Other assets $583M line item removed from balance sheet
- Carried interest allocation recovery (compensation) line item format changed from recovery/compensation structure
- Other expenses, net line item removed and replaced with 'Other income (expenses), net'
- Statement of operations periods changed from 'Three Months Ended' and 'Nine Months Ended' to only 'For the Three Months Ended'
- Comparison year changed from 2024 data to 2025 data in income statement
- Reworded:
- Balance sheet date description changed from 'AS AT September 30, and December 31' to 'AS OF March 31, and December 31'
- Balance sheet reference terminology changed from 'as at' to 'as of'
- Date reference changed from 'presented as at September 30, 2025' to 'presented as of March 31, 2026'
- Other expenses, net ($-107M in older) became Other income (expenses), net ($10M in newer) indicating sign and classification reversal
- Income statement period changed from nine-month reporting to quarterly reporting (older included nine months ended, newer shows only three months ended)
- Statement of operations caption changed from 'FOR THE PERIODS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30' to 'FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31'
- Carried interest allocation section restructured: older had 'recovery (compensation)' with line for realized showing positive/negative, newer shows only allocations with expense compensation separately
- Notes:
- The older filing contained nine-month data and three-month data; the newer contains only three-month data, limiting direct comparability
- Balance sheet comparison dates differ: older compares September 30, 2025 to December 31, 2024; newer compares March 31, 2026 to December 31, 2025
- Some line items may have been reclassified or consolidated rather than truly added/removed (e.g., property, plant & equipment, intangibles, goodwill appear as new line items but may have been previously reported elsewhere)
- The newer filing text appears truncated at the cash flows section, limiting full assessment of changes in that section
Risk Factors
- Added:
- Newer filing (2026-05-08) adds: 'For accounting purposes and' in the definition of BAM's historical financial information reference
- Newer filing (2026-05-08) adds explicit reference to '(the "Asset Management Company") as the "Predecessor" of BAM' in the definition section
- Newer filing (2026-05-08) adds phrase 'Unless the context suggests otherwise:' before the list of defined terms instead of 'Unless the context suggests otherwise, references to:'
- Removed:
- Older filing (2025-11-10) references 'December 31, 2024' in the Annual Report date; newer filing (2026-05-08) changes to 'December 31, 2025'
- Older filing (2025-11-10) uses 'references to Brookfield Asset Management ULC as the "Predecessor" of BAM ("Asset Management Company")'; newer filing (2026-05-08) restructures as 'references to the historical financial statements of Brookfield Asset Management ULC (the "Asset Management Company") as the "Predecessor" of BAM'
- Older filing (2025-11-10) uses phrase 'Unless the context suggests otherwise, references to:'; newer filing (2026-05-08) changes to 'Unless the context suggests otherwise:'
- Reworded:
- Angel Oak definition: older filing states '51.29% economic interest'; newer filing states '51.3% economic interest'
- Definition of BAM's historical references: older filing uses 'For periods prior to' while newer filing uses 'For accounting purposes and for periods prior to'
- Older filing references 'Brookfield Asset Management Ltd.' generically in forward-looking statements section; newer filing uses full abbreviation 'Brookfield Asset Management Ltd. ("BAM")' with explicit acronym
- AEL Mandate definition: older filing states 'American National Group LLC' while newer filing states 'American National Group LLC' (same), but older includes 'American National Group LLC' without full stop before the period
- Notes:
- Page numbering differs between filings (85-88 in newer vs. 92-95 in older), but this reflects table of contents pagination changes, not substantive content changes
- The Angel Oak percentage change from 51.29% to 51.3% may represent rounding or clarification rather than an actual change in ownership
- Minor punctuation and formatting variations exist but do not constitute substantive changes to risk factor disclosures
AI-assisted comparison of two SEC filing sections. It describes wording and theme changes only, makes no materiality, legal, or investment judgement, and is not financial advice. Informational only — not financial advice.
Insider activity (SEC Form 4)
No open-market insider purchases or sales are on record for BAM — recent Form 4 activity was compensation-related (awards, option exercises, or tax withholding), not open-market buying or selling.
View full insider trading history → View SEC Form 3/4/5 filingsOnly open-market purchases (SEC code P) and sales (code S) are counted here. Option exercises, vesting/awards, gifts, and shares withheld for taxes are excluded — they are compensation or mechanical, not open-market conviction. Sales may be planned and non-discretionary (e.g. a Rule 10b5-1 plan) and are not necessarily bearish; open-market buying is not a recommendation to buy. Informational only — not financial advice.
Institutional ownership (13F)
6 institutional 13F filers reported holding BAM as of 2026-03-31 (quarter-end position, filed within 45 days).
- Distinct 13F filers 6
- Reported shares held 20,805,420
- Reported value $924,857,237
reported quarterly holdings change (2025-12-31 → 2026-03-31): 1 new, 3 increased, 2 decreased, 0 exited. Change counts cover only managers that filed 13F reports in BOTH quarters, derived between two quarter-end snapshots — not same-day trades; a single manager is never said to have "bought" or "sold".
Institutional holdings are quarter-end long positions reported on SEC Form 13F-HR, filed up to 45 days after the quarter ends — they are delayed, are not real-time trades, exclude short positions and most non-US securities, and are not investment advice. Any increase/decrease is a reported change between two quarterly snapshots, not a same-day purchase or sale. These are quarter-end snapshots from the 13F filings on SEC EDGAR, filed within 45 days — not real-time, and any change is a difference between two quarterly reports, not a same-day trade. Informational only — not financial advice.
Short interest (FINRA)
BAM had 19,447,611 shares of reported short interest as of the 2026-07-31 FINRA settlement date (delayed, bi-monthly; not real-time).
Short interest as a percent of shares outstanding is not shown for BAM because we do not hold a verified share count to divide it by. The reported figures above are unaffected.
- Reported short interest (shares) 19,447,611
- Prior settlement (shares) 18,442,128
- Reported change 5.45%
- Days to cover (reported) 9.18
Reported to FINRA as of the 2026-07-31 settlement date. Short interest is reported to FINRA and published on a delayed, bi-monthly schedule (as of a settlement date, disseminated roughly eight business days later) — it is NOT real-time, does not cover every venue or all US trading, and is not a short-squeeze prediction or investment advice. Days-to-cover is the value FINRA reports; percent of float is not shown because the source file carries no share-count denominator — where a percent appears it is of shares OUTSTANDING, the larger base, and is therefore a floor on percent of float. Informational only — not financial advice.
Competitors & peers
- Blackstone (BX)
- KKR & Co. (KKR)
- Apollo Global Management (APO)
- The Carlyle Group (CG)
- Blue Owl Capital (OWL)
AI-enriched competitor set. Linked names are companies covered by stocks-llm; other named peers are shown for reference only.
Compare BAM vs…
Brookfield Asset Management is found in…
BAM shows up in…
Frequently asked questions
What does Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) do?
Brookfield Asset Management is a leading global alternative asset manager focused on real assets and credit strategies. The company manages a vast portfolio of capital across infrastructure, renewable power, real estate, private equity, and credit for institutional and retail investors. It operates as a pure-play asset manager with significant fee-bearing capital.
What sector is Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) in?
Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) is classified in the Financials sector. Its industry is alternative asset management. It trades on NYSE.
Does BAM pay a dividend?
Yes — Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) pays a dividend, with an indicated yield of about 3.77% and at least 2 years of non-decreasing per-share dividends (SEC EDGAR XBRL) — we do not hold the year before it, so the real streak may be longer (market data, as of 2026-08-24). Informational only — not financial advice.
Who are Brookfield Asset Management's (BAM) competitors?
Notable peers of Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) include Blackstone, KKR & Co., Apollo Global Management, The Carlyle Group and Blue Owl Capital. This peer set is informational only — not financial advice.
Is Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) overbought or oversold right now?
Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) is currently neither overbought nor oversold — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 55, in the neutral middle (as of 2026-08-21). RSI describes recent price momentum, not a forecast — informational only, not financial advice.
Where does stocks-llm's data on BAM come from?
Fundamentals and prices come from market data, as of 2026-08-24; company filings and profile facts come from SEC EDGAR. All figures are delayed daily-close data shown with their as-of date — informational only, not financial advice.
Fundamentals: market data, as of 2026-08-24. Filings: SEC EDGAR. Prices are delayed daily-close data.
Last updated 2026-08-21.
Informational only — NOT financial advice. All figures are delayed daily-close data from SEC EDGAR & market data, shown with their as-of date.