CMS Energy (CMS)
Utilities · Electric and Gas Utilities · NYSE
A Michigan-focused electric and natural gas utility holding company committed to reliable energy delivery and renewable power production.
What CMS Energy does
CMS Energy is a Michigan-based energy holding company that operates primarily through its subsidiary, Consumers Energy, an electric and gas utility serving residential, commercial, and industrial customers. Through its NorthStar Clean Energy subsidiary, the company also engages in independent power production, including renewable energy generation and marketing. The business focuses on the generation, transmission, storage, and distribution of electricity and natural gas.
Themes: electric utility, natural gas utility, renewable energy, independent power production, grid infrastructure, utility regulation
Fundamentals
- Price$68.27 as of 2026-08-21 close
- Market cap$21.4B as of 2026-08-21
- 1-year return-6.2% 2025-08-21 close $72.78 → 2026-08-21 close $68.27
- P/E21.53 as of 2026-08-24
- Net margin+12.3% as of 2026-08-24
- Gross margin+31.9% as of 2026-08-24
- ROE+11.0% as of 2026-08-24
- Debt / equity1.97 as of 2026-08-24
- Revenue growth (YoY)+9.3% as of 2026-08-24
- Revenue CAGR (3y)-0.2% SEC XBRL
- Beta0.31 as of 2026-08-24
- Last reported earnings2026-07-28 SEC EDGAR Form 8-K (Item 2.02)
Dividend: yield +3.4%; at least 5 years of non-decreasing per-share dividends (SEC XBRL) — we do not hold the year before it, so the real streak may be longer.
How CMS compares in its sector
- price-to-earnings ratiomiddle range 67 covered Utilities peers, as of 2026-08-24
- net profit marginmiddle range 71 covered Utilities peers, as of 2026-08-24
- operating marginmiddle range 71 covered Utilities peers, as of 2026-08-24
- gross marginmiddle range 53 covered Utilities peers, as of 2026-08-24
- return on equitymiddle range 72 covered Utilities peers, as of 2026-08-24
- 3-year revenue CAGRbottom 25% 70 covered Utilities peers
- indicated dividend yieldmiddle range 67 covered Utilities peers, as of 2026-08-24
Position among covered Utilities companies that report each metric (minimum 5 peers). A relative position within our covered catalog — not a valuation, quality, or investment judgment. A higher percentile is simply a higher value (for P/E, more expensive on earnings — never "better"). Informational only.
Top 10 scores & list membership
CMS is not currently in any published Top 10 list. Its scores are below.
Long-term score
42.4 #757 of 987 scored · #39 of 55 in Utilities
Capital return 71st (consecutive years of dividend increases 5 years) and valuation 59th (price to book 2.2, price to earnings 20.3); weakest is financial health (18th, debt to equity 2).
Short-term score
45.8 #1077 of 1,704 scored · #32 of 59 in Utilities
Volume and participation 77th: trading volume is about normal versus its 30-day average; catalysts 57th: the analyst consensus rating has improved toward "buy" since the prior reading; weakest is trend 23rd: it is trading 7.1% below its 50-day average, the short-term trend line.
Scores as of 21 Aug 2026. Each bar is a percentile: how this company ranked against every company the score ranked, 0–100. A list is a published formula and its output, not a recommendation. Method version 2.
Dividend coverage
Not assessed — last reported dividend predates the accounts. The most recent fiscal year in which CMS reported a dividend payment is FY2022, while its reported financial statements run through FY2025. Coverage is therefore not assessed for the latest year — an FY2022 ratio would not describe CMS today.
Coverage is derived from reported SEC EDGAR XBRL figures, comparing dividends paid against net income and free cash flow for the SAME fiscal year. It is not shown here because the latest fiscal year with a reported dividend payment (FY2022) is older than the latest year of reported financial statements (FY2025), so any ratio would describe an out-of-date year. Informational only — not financial advice.
How CMS Energy looks technically
CMS Energy (CMS) is trading 7.5% below its 200-day average, the long-term trend line — a long-term downtrend. Its 50-day average crossed below its 200-day average about 13 trading days ago — a "death cross", a bearish long-term signal. There is no clear trend right now — the price is choppy (ADX, a 0–100 trend-strength gauge, is 13, below the 25 that marks a real trend), though sellers have been pushing harder than buyers lately — pressure, not a trend. Momentum is neutral — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 30, neither overbought (above 70) nor oversold (below 30). MACD, a trend-momentum gauge, turned bearish about 1 trading day ago (its momentum flipped negative). It just made a new 20-day low, breaking below its recent trading range. It is trading right at its lowest price of the past year (its 52-week low).
Trend
8
| Distance from the 200-day | it is trading 7.5% below its 200-day average, the long-term trend line — a long-term downtrend | -7.5% |
|---|---|---|
| 50-day moving average | its average price over the last 50 trading days — a short-term trend line — is $73.49 | $73.49 |
| 200-day moving average | its average price over the last 200 trading days — the long-term trend line — is $73.79 | $73.79 |
| Swing structure | each recent peak has been lower than the one before it and each dip deeper — the pattern chart-watchers call a downtrend, which describes where price has already been and not where it goes next | lower highs and lower lows |
| Last swing turn | its last significant turn was a swing low 10 calendar days ago — the swings before that are what the structure reading is measured on | 10 sessions |
| Wave structure | its recent swings can be read as a five-part downward sequence — what Elliott-wave chartists call an impulse — now in the fourth leg, a pullback against that downward direction; the labelling fails if price closes above 71.785. It is the only labelling that fits, and it describes the swings already printed, not what comes next. | possible downward five-wave sequence, in wave 4 |
| Since the 50/200 cross | its 50-day average crossed below its 200-day average about 13 trading days ago — a "death cross", a bearish long-term signal | 13 sessions |
| Trend strength (14-day ADX) | there is no clear trend right now — the price is choppy (ADX, a 0–100 trend-strength gauge, is 13, below the 25 that marks a real trend), though sellers have been pushing harder than buyers lately — pressure, not a trend | 13.4 |
Momentum
3
| 14-day RSI | momentum is neutral — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 30, neither overbought (above 70) nor oversold (below 30) | 30.3 |
|---|---|---|
| Position in its 14-day range | it is trading right at the bottom of its 14-day range ($68.25 to $72.44) — its "stochastic" reading is 0 out of 100, where 0 would mean closing exactly at the 14-session low and 100 exactly at the high. This measures WHERE the price sits inside its recent range, which is a different question from the RSI beside it: RSI is a momentum gauge, measuring how FAST the price has been moving, so a stock can drift quietly to the bottom of its range with an ordinary RSI, or fall sharply and still sit in the middle. It has been slipping within that range over the last few sessions. | 0.5 |
| Since the MACD crossed zero | MACD, a trend-momentum gauge, turned bearish about 1 trading day ago (its momentum flipped negative) | 1 session |
Range
12
| 52-week high | its highest closing price over the past year (about 252 trading days) was $80.36 | $80.36 |
|---|---|---|
| From the 52-week high | it is 15.0% below its 52-week high (its highest price of the past year) | -15.0% |
| Above the 52-week low | it is trading right at its lowest price of the past year (its 52-week low) | +0.0% |
| Below the 52-week high | it is 15.0% below its highest point of the past year | 15.0% |
| Since a 20-day breakout | it just made a new 20-day low, breaking below its recent trading range | 1 session |
| Since a 55-day breakout | it just made a new 55-day low, breaking below its recent trading range | 1 session |
| All-time high | its highest closing price on record is $80.36 (set on 2026-04-09) | $80.36 |
| Given back of the 52-week move | over the past year its closes ranged ($68.27 to $79.94), and it has recovered essentially none of its fall from last year’s high — 0% of it. Chart-watchers call 61.8%-65% given back the "golden pocket" — for this company that is $75.48 to $75.86. It is watched widely enough that orders cluster there, which is the honest reason it matters; it is not a forecast. | 0.0% |
| From the all-time high | it is 15.0% below its all-time high | -15.0% |
| Nearest price level | it is sitting right on a resistance level at $68.43 — a price it turned at 14 times since 2024-08-29, most recently on 2026-08-11. Since 2024-08-21 it has 1 such level below the current price and 6 above. Levels like these describe where the price has reversed or paused before; they are not a forecast of where it will go. | +0.2% |
| All-time low | its lowest closing price on record is $8.33 (set on 2008-10-10) | $8.33 |
| Above the all-time low | it is 719.6% above its all-time low | +719.6% |
Volatility
5
| Band width vs its own 6 months | day-to-day price swings are wider than usual versus its own recent 6-month history (wider than about 76% of it) | 76th percentile |
|---|---|---|
| Typical daily range | in a typical session it travels about $1.36 between its high and its low — about 2.0% of its price. That is its "average true range" over the last 14 sessions, which also counts the distance from the previous close, so a day that opens well away from yesterday counts as the large move it was | $1.36 |
| Bollinger bands (20-day, ±2σ) | most of its recent trading has stayed between about $68.09 and $74.51 — the "Bollinger bands", a range drawn two standard deviations either side of its 20-day average price, which widens when the stock gets more volatile and narrows when it settles | $68.09 – $71.30 – $74.51 |
| Typical daily range (% of price) | its price moves about 2.0% in a typical session — among the calmest in the catalog. This is the average gap between a session's high and low over the last 14 sessions, counting overnight moves, expressed against the current price so it can be compared with companies trading at any price | 2.0% |
| Stretch from the 200-day average | it is trading 4.1 daily ranges below its 200-day average price (7.5% below it in plain percentage terms) — a way of asking how far it has stretched from its own average in units of how far it normally moves in a day, so a calm company and a jumpy one can be compared on the same scale | 4.1 daily ranges below its 200-day average |
Volume
1
| Volume vs its 30-day average | trading volume is about normal versus its 30-day average | 1.08× |
|---|
Analyst
2
| Change in the average price target | analysts have cut their average price target by 0.4% since the prior reading | -0.4% |
|---|---|---|
| Change in the consensus rating | the analyst consensus rating has improved toward "buy" since the prior reading | 0.11 toward buy |
Price gaps
2
| Gap at the open | it opened on 2026-08-21 0.4% above the previous session's close — an overnight gap, the part of the move that happened while the market was shut, and traded back through that level before the close | +0.4% |
|---|---|---|
| Gap filled | a 4.1% gap up opened on 2026-06-11 has been "filled" 13 sessions ago — price traded back through the level the gap left behind, and it took 35 sessions to close | 13 sessions ago |
Price streaks
1
| Closing streak | it has closed lower 4 sessions in a row, a -4.38% move over the run — an unbroken run of down days, which describes what has already happened and says nothing about the next session | 4 sessions down |
|---|
Relative strength
4
| vs market, 1 month | over the past 1 month this stock lagged the market by 8.2 percentage points (the stock lost 5.8% while the market gained 2.3%) | -8.2% |
|---|---|---|
| vs market, 3 months | over the past 3 months this stock lagged the market by 10.4 percentage points (the stock lost 7.3% while the market gained 3.1%) | -10.4% |
| vs market, 6 months | over the past 6 months this stock lagged the market by 21.1 percentage points (the stock lost 10.0% while the market gained 11.1%) | -21.1% |
| vs market, 12 months | over the past 12 months this stock lagged the market by 26.7 percentage points (the stock lost 6.2% while the market gained 20.5%) | -26.7% |
Signal agreement
2
| Bullish technical signals | 1 of the 9 technical signals we can compute for it is currently in a bullish state: near the bottom of its 14-day range (oversold) — these describe past price behaviour, not a forecast | 1 of 9 |
|---|---|---|
| Bearish technical signals | 6 of the 9 technical signals we can compute for it are currently in a bearish state: a "death cross" — its 50-day average is below its 200-day, trading below its 200-day average, a fresh 20-day low, MACD momentum is negative, lagging the market over 6 months, trading below the Ichimoku cloud — these describe past price behaviour, not a forecast | 6 of 9 |
Trend (Ichimoku cloud)
1
| Vs the Ichimoku cloud | trading 7.4% below the Ichimoku cloud — a band drawn from where its own highs and lows sat up to 2026-07-16 and projected forward over today's price, the side traders read as an established downtrend, with the band above acting as the level that would have to be cleared. The band itself is thin, spanning 1.7% of the share price, which is taken to mean a barrier that gives way easily. | -7.4% |
|---|
Volume-weighted price
2
| Vs this year’s average price paid | the price is 8% below the average price paid so far this year, so the typical buyer over that stretch is under water. That average is $73.95 — a volume-weighted average of daily closes over 157 sessions, not a true tick-by-tick VWAP. | -7.7% |
|---|---|---|
| Vs the average paid since it last reported | the price is 4% below the average price paid since it last reported on 2026-07-28 (its 10-Q), so the typical buyer over that stretch is under water. That average is $71.16 — a volume-weighted average of daily closes over 19 sessions, not a true tick-by-tick VWAP. | -4.0% |
Price levels it has turned at before
CMS last closed at $68.27 on 2026-08-21. Since 2024-08-21 it has turned at 1 price below its last close and 6 above; the nearest below and the 3 nearest above are listed, nearest first.
| Level | Side | Distance | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| $68.43 | Resistance | 0.2% above the last close | turned there 14 times · 2024-08-29 to 2026-08-11 |
| $71.22 | Resistance | 4.3% above the last close | turned there 14 times · 2024-10-03 to 2026-07-21 |
| $65.21 | Support | 4.5% below the last close | turned there four times · 2024-11-07 to 2025-02-03 |
| $72.46 | Resistance | 6.1% above the last close | turned there three times · 2024-10-24 to 2025-11-19 |
A level is a price this company reversed or paused at more than once — they describe past behaviour, not a forecast of where the price will go.
Wave structure
Its recent swings can be read as a five-part downward sequence — what Elliott-wave chartists call an impulse — now in leg 4 of five, a pullback against that direction.
This labelling fails — stops being a possible reading at all — if it closes above $71.78.
It is the only labelling that fits these swings, though its proportions are not the textbook ones.
On past moves of this shape the leg has usually ended somewhere between $70.55 and $71.78 — that is where it has tended to end if the count holds, not a forecast of where the price goes.
This reading has stood for 1 trading day, since 2026-08-21.
Read from daily closes as of 2026-08-21.
An Elliott-wave count describes the swings already printed and the level that would disprove it. It is not a forecast, a target, or advice.
Screens: Trading below the 200-day moving average · Recent death cross (50-day crossed below 200-day) · Near the 52-week low · Broke down to a new 20-day low · MACD just crossed bearish (12/26/9) · trendless / choppy (low ADX) | Learn: moving average · golden cross · adx · rsi · macd · breakout · fifty two week high low
Based on daily closing prices as of 2026-08-21. Describes past price behavior only — informational, not financial advice.
Analyst consensus
- Consensus ratingBuy (2.27 mean, 1=Strong Buy…5=Strong Sell) — 12 analysts
- Mean price target$80.00 range $68.00 – $87.00; median $80.50
Analyst estimates, as of 2026-08-19. These are third-party analyst opinions and price targets, aggregated — not a recommendation, prediction, or advice from stocks-llm. Informational only.
Analyst EPS estimate for CMS
- Consensus EPS estimate$1.14 next reporting period, as of 2026-08-19
Change over time is not available yet: it needs two readings of the same reporting period at least 30 days apart, and we have been recording these estimates since 2026-08-04. An estimate for a DIFFERENT quarter is not a revision, so a reading from before the last report is never compared with one after it.
The consensus estimate for the next reporting period, and how it has moved between readings of that SAME period. A change is measured only between readings estimating one period — when a company reports, the consensus moves to the next quarter and the two numbers are not comparable. Informational only, not a forecast and not advice.
Key risks (from latest filing)
["Regulatory and legislative changes affecting rate recovery","Adverse weather conditions impacting demand and infrastructure reliability","Fluctuations in energy commodity prices"]
What changed in the latest 10-Q
AI-assisted comparison of CMS's 10-Q filed 2026-04-28 against the prior one filed 2025-10-30.
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
The two filings could not be meaningfully compared for this section.
Risk Factors
- Added:
- Newer filing (2026-04-28) adds section title 'Consumers Electric Utility Outlook and Uncertainties' with 'Energy Supply' subsection heading
- Newer filing adds: 'Consumers' Electric Supply Plan' terminology replacing 'Clean Energy Plan'
- Newer filing adds: 'integrated resource plan' explicitly mentioned as component of Electric Supply Plan
- Newer filing adds details on three additional emergency orders issued after May 2025, extending J.H. Campbell operation through May 18, 2026
- Newer filing adds: FERC rejected MISO's compliance filing in March 2026 and MISO submitted revised filing in April 2026 with approval pending
- Newer filing adds: January 2026 FERC filing by Consumers seeking recovery of $42 million net financial impact from May 2025 emergency order period
- Newer filing adds: Financial impact of $138 million for second emergency order period through March 31, 2026 after MISO revenues of $143 million
- Newer filing adds: March 2026 announcement of integrated resource plan to include two new natural gas-fueled plants totaling 1,500 MW in Bay and Genesee Counties
- Newer filing adds: 'all-of-the-above approach' terminology for electric supply strategy
- Newer filing specifies battery storage contracted at 850 MW (vs. 700 MW in older filing)
- Newer filing specifies wind energy up to 4,000 MW in Renewable Energy Plan updates
- Newer filing adds: Third parties challenged FERC's August 2025 order granting tariff modifications, with legal challenge on hold pending separate challenges to emergency orders
- Removed:
- Older filing (2025-10-30) references 'Clean Energy Plan' terminology, replaced by 'Electric Supply Plan' in newer filing
- Older filing discusses plan to retire J.H. Campbell 'in May 2025' as future event; newer filing reflects actual events post-May 2025
- Older filing mentions only first emergency order through August 20, 2025; newer filing supersedes with information on subsequent orders
- Older filing states MISO's September 2025 tariff filing 'is pending at FERC'; newer filing updates status to rejected in March 2026 with revised filing in April 2026
- Older filing references 700 MW of battery storage capacity contracted; newer filing increases to 850 MW
- Older filing specifies 2,800 MW of wind energy resources in renewable energy plan updates; newer filing specifies up to 4,000 MW
- Older filing discusses customer programs (demand response, energy efficiency, conservation voltage reduction); these not mentioned in newer filing's risk factors section
- Reworded:
- Older: 'Energy Transformation' heading changed to 'Energy Supply' in newer filing
- Older: 'Clean Energy Plan details its long-term strategy' changed to 'Electric Supply Plan, its long-term strategy' in newer filing
- Older: 'Coupled with Consumers' renewable energy plan' changed to 'incorporates Consumers' Renewable Energy Plan' in newer filing
- Older: 'blueprint to meeting the requirements' changed to 'blueprint for compliance with Michigan's 2023 Energy Law' in newer filing
- Older: 'created a new energy storage standard that requires... based on their pro rata share' changed to newer specific language stating 'MPSC Staff has indicated that Consumers' share of this target is 817 MW'
- Older: 'While Consumers' existing Clean Energy Plan... provides a path towards meeting these requirements, Consumers will file updates to the plan in 2026' changed to newer: 'Consumers expects to file updates to its integrated resource plan in June 2026'
- Older: Reference to 'U.S. Department of Energy' changed to 'U.S. Secretary of Energy' in newer filing for consistency
- Older: Discussion of PPA with MCV Partnership separated into resource adequacy section with expanded details in newer filing
- Older: 'Currently, over 15 percent of the electricity Consumers supplies to customers comes from renewable energy sources' statement removed from newer filing
- Older: Details on three wind projects totaling 517 MW and 20-year solar PPA not repeated in newer filing's risk factors
- Notes:
- Newer filing appears truncated at end of renewable capacity illustration section, while older filing similarly truncated; full comparison of final portions not possible
- Older filing references 'Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements—Note 1, Regulatory Matters' for additional FERC proceeding discussion; newer filing does not include this cross-reference in provided text
- Timeline of emergency orders spans May 2025 through April 2026, with older filing covering only through August 2025 period; comparison reflects passage of time between filings
AI-assisted comparison of two SEC filing sections. It describes wording and theme changes only, makes no materiality, legal, or investment judgement, and is not financial advice. Informational only — not financial advice.
Insider activity (SEC Form 4)
1 open-market purchase and 0 open-market sales by insiders in the last 90 days.
- Last 30 days1 buy ($14491) · 0 sells — 1 buying insider
- Last 90 days1 buy ($14491) · 0 sells — 1 buying insider
- Last 180 days1 buy ($14491) · 1 sell ($222930) — 1 buying, 1 selling insiders
Activity heuristic: net buying (a transparent product heuristic from the counts above, not a prediction or advice)
Most recent open-market transaction: 2026-07-31. As of 2026-08-24.
View full insider trading history → View SEC Form 3/4/5 filingsAsk about CMS's insider activity →
Only open-market purchases (SEC code P) and sales (code S) are counted here. Option exercises, vesting/awards, gifts, and shares withheld for taxes are excluded — they are compensation or mechanical, not open-market conviction. Sales may be planned and non-discretionary (e.g. a Rule 10b5-1 plan) and are not necessarily bearish; open-market buying is not a recommendation to buy. Informational only — not financial advice.
Congressional trading disclosures
U.S. House members publicly disclose their own, their spouse's, and dependent children's stock transactions under the STOCK Act. We hold 4 matched disclosures for CMS from U.S. House Clerk Periodic Transaction Report filings.
Congressional trading disclosures →Institutional ownership (13F)
5 institutional 13F filers reported holding CMS as of 2026-03-31 (quarter-end position, filed within 45 days).
- Distinct 13F filers 5
- Reported shares held 53,170,779
- Reported value $4,124,988,994
reported quarterly holdings change (2025-12-31 → 2026-03-31): 0 new, 3 increased, 2 decreased, 1 exited. Change counts cover only managers that filed 13F reports in BOTH quarters, derived between two quarter-end snapshots — not same-day trades; a single manager is never said to have "bought" or "sold".
Institutional holdings are quarter-end long positions reported on SEC Form 13F-HR, filed up to 45 days after the quarter ends — they are delayed, are not real-time trades, exclude short positions and most non-US securities, and are not investment advice. Any increase/decrease is a reported change between two quarterly snapshots, not a same-day purchase or sale. These are quarter-end snapshots from the 13F filings on SEC EDGAR, filed within 45 days — not real-time, and any change is a difference between two quarterly reports, not a same-day trade. Informational only — not financial advice.
Short interest (FINRA)
CMS had 16,591,680 shares of reported short interest as of the 2026-07-31 FINRA settlement date (delayed, bi-monthly; not real-time).
CMS had 5.29% of its shares outstanding sold short as of the 2026-07-31 FINRA settlement date (percent of FLOAT would be higher — float is not disclosed in the source). FINRA reported 4.05 days to cover at the same settlement.
- Reported short interest (shares) 16,591,680
- Short interest (% of shares outstanding) 5.29%
- Prior settlement (shares) 20,375,115
- Reported change -18.57%
- Days to cover (reported) 4.05
Reported to FINRA as of the 2026-07-31 settlement date. Short interest is reported to FINRA and published on a delayed, bi-monthly schedule (as of a settlement date, disseminated roughly eight business days later) — it is NOT real-time, does not cover every venue or all US trading, and is not a short-squeeze prediction or investment advice. Days-to-cover is the value FINRA reports; percent of float is not shown because the source file carries no share-count denominator — where a percent appears it is of shares OUTSTANDING, the larger base, and is therefore a floor on percent of float. Informational only — not financial advice.
Competitors & peers
AI-enriched competitor set. Linked names are companies covered by stocks-llm; other named peers are shown for reference only.
Compare CMS vs…
CMS Energy is found in…
CMS shows up in…
Frequently asked questions
What does CMS Energy (CMS) do?
CMS Energy is a Michigan-based energy holding company that operates primarily through its subsidiary, Consumers Energy, an electric and gas utility serving residential, commercial, and industrial customers. Through its NorthStar Clean Energy subsidiary, the company also engages in independent power production, including renewable energy generation and marketing. The business focuses on the generation, transmission, storage, and distribution of electricity and natural gas.
What sector is CMS Energy (CMS) in?
CMS Energy (CMS) is classified in the Utilities sector. Its industry is Electric and Gas Utilities. It trades on NYSE.
Does CMS pay a dividend?
Yes — CMS Energy (CMS) pays a dividend, with an indicated yield of about 3.39% and at least 5 years of non-decreasing per-share dividends (SEC EDGAR XBRL) — we do not hold the year before it, so the real streak may be longer (market data, as of 2026-08-24). Informational only — not financial advice.
Who are CMS Energy's (CMS) competitors?
Notable peers of CMS Energy (CMS) include DTE Energy, American Electric Power, FirstEnergy, Exelon and NextEra Energy. This peer set is informational only — not financial advice.
Has there been recent Congressional stock trading in CMS?
Yes — we hold 4 matched STOCK Act disclosures for CMS from U.S. House Clerk Periodic Transaction Report filings. These are legally-required disclosures (often filed 30–45 days after the trade), may belong to a U.S. House member, their spouse, or a dependent child, and are not an indicator of company performance or investment advice.
Is CMS Energy (CMS) overbought or oversold right now?
CMS Energy (CMS) is currently neither overbought nor oversold — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 30, in the neutral middle (as of 2026-08-21). RSI describes recent price momentum, not a forecast — informational only, not financial advice.
Where does stocks-llm's data on CMS come from?
Fundamentals and prices come from market data, as of 2026-08-24; company filings and profile facts come from SEC EDGAR. All figures are delayed daily-close data shown with their as-of date — informational only, not financial advice.
Fundamentals: market data, as of 2026-08-24. Filings: SEC EDGAR. Prices are delayed daily-close data.
Last updated 2026-08-21.
Informational only — NOT financial advice. All figures are delayed daily-close data from SEC EDGAR & market data, shown with their as-of date.