CrowdStrike (CRWD)
Information Technology · Cloud-Native Cybersecurity Platforms · NASDAQ
CrowdStrike is a cloud-native, AI-powered cybersecurity platform that consolidates fragmented legacy point products into a single unified Falcon platform delivering real-time breach prevention across endpoints, cloud workloads, and identities.
What CrowdStrike does
CrowdStrike is a cloud-native cybersecurity platform company founded in 2011 that delivers the AI-native Falcon platform for comprehensive threat detection and response. The Falcon platform is a unified, modular security solution accessible through a single lightweight sensor that collects and correlates trillions of cybersecurity events per week across endpoints, cloud workloads, identities, and enterprise data. The company operates on a SaaS subscription model, offering 33 cloud modules across markets including endpoint security, cloud workload protection, identity protection, SIEM and log management, threat intelligence, and AI security. Revenue is generated through subscriptions priced per unit of measure (per-endpoint, per-identity, per-cloud sensor, etc.) supplemented by incident response and professional services.
Themes: AI-native cybersecurity, Cloud security, Threat detection and response, Identity security, Security consolidation platform, Real-time threat prevention, Managed security services, Enterprise risk management, AI Security Cloud, Zero-trust architecture
Fundamentals
- Price$190.68 as of 2026-08-24 close
- Market cap$230.2B as of 2026-08-24
- 1-year return+81.4% 2025-08-22 close $105.14 → 2026-08-24 close $190.68
- P/En/a negative earnings
- Net margin-0.5% as of 2026-08-24
- Gross margin+75.2% as of 2026-08-24
- ROE-0.6% as of 2026-08-24
- Debt / equity0.16 as of 2026-08-24
- Revenue growth (YoY)+23.2% as of 2026-08-24
- Beta1.56 as of 2026-08-24
- Last reported earnings2026-06-03 SEC EDGAR Form 8-K (Item 2.02)
How CRWD compares in its sector
- net profit marginmiddle range 405 covered Information Technology peers, as of 2026-08-24
- operating marginmiddle range 405 covered Information Technology peers, as of 2026-08-24
- gross margintop 25% 403 covered Information Technology peers, as of 2026-08-24
- return on equitymiddle range 405 covered Information Technology peers, as of 2026-08-24
- free cash flow (absolute dollars, latest fiscal year)top 25% 382 covered Information Technology peers, as of FY2026
Position among covered Information Technology companies that report each metric (minimum 5 peers). A relative position within our covered catalog — not a valuation, quality, or investment judgment. A higher percentile is simply a higher value (for P/E, more expensive on earnings — never "better"). Informational only.
Top 10 scores & list membership
CRWD is not currently in any published Top 10 list. Its scores are below.
Long-term score
Not scored for the long-term list: no shareholder return data.
Short-term score
49.7 #802 of 1,704 scored · #112 of 261 in Information Technology
Momentum 57th: near the bottom of its 14-day range (oversold); volume and participation 55th: trading volume is about normal versus its 30-day average; weakest is trend 41st: a strong downtrend, with sellers in control.
Scores as of 21 Aug 2026. Each bar is a percentile: how this company ranked against every company the score ranked, 0–100. A list is a published formula and its output, not a recommendation. Method version 2.
How CrowdStrike looks technically
CrowdStrike (CRWD) is trading 38.8% above its 200-day average, the long-term trend line — a longer-term uptrend. Its 50-day average crossed above its 200-day average about 59 trading days ago — a "golden cross", a bullish long-term signal. A strong downtrend is in place — ADX, a 0–100 trend-strength gauge, is 29, with sellers in control. Momentum is neutral — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 43, neither overbought (above 70) nor oversold (below 30). MACD, a trend-momentum gauge, turned bearish about 3 trading days ago (its momentum flipped negative). It made a new 20-day high about 7 trading days ago. It is 15.6% below its highest point of the past year.
Trend
7
| Distance from the 200-day | it is trading 38.8% above its 200-day average, the long-term trend line — a longer-term uptrend | +38.8% |
|---|---|---|
| 50-day moving average | its average price over the last 50 trading days — a short-term trend line — is $193.14 | $193.14 |
| 200-day moving average | its average price over the last 200 trading days — the long-term trend line — is $138.32 | $138.32 |
| Swing structure | its recent peaks and dips disagree — one of them is rising while the other is not, so there is no clean up or down pattern in the swings | mixed — one of the two is not confirming |
| Last swing turn | its last significant turn was a swing high 7 calendar days ago — the swings before that are what the structure reading is measured on | 7 sessions |
| Since the 50/200 cross | its 50-day average crossed above its 200-day average about 59 trading days ago — a "golden cross", a bullish long-term signal | 59 sessions |
| Trend strength (14-day ADX) | a strong downtrend is in place — ADX, a 0–100 trend-strength gauge, is 29, with sellers in control | 28.9 |
Momentum
3
| 14-day RSI | momentum is neutral — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 43, neither overbought (above 70) nor oversold (below 30) | 42.9 |
|---|---|---|
| Position in its 14-day range | it is trading near the bottom of its 14-day range ($187.01 to $227.50) — its "stochastic" reading is 12 out of 100, where 0 would mean closing exactly at the 14-session low and 100 exactly at the high. This measures WHERE the price sits inside its recent range, which is a different question from the RSI beside it: RSI is a momentum gauge, measuring how FAST the price has been moving, so a stock can drift quietly to the bottom of its range with an ordinary RSI, or fall sharply and still sit in the middle. It has been slipping within that range over the last few sessions. | 12.2 |
| Since the MACD crossed zero | MACD, a trend-momentum gauge, turned bearish about 3 trading days ago (its momentum flipped negative) | 3 sessions |
Range
12
| 52-week high | its highest closing price over the past year (about 252 trading days) was $227.50 | $227.50 |
|---|---|---|
| From the 52-week high | it is 15.6% below its 52-week high (its highest price of the past year) | -15.6% |
| Above the 52-week low | it is 124.0% above its 52-week low (its lowest price of the past year) | +124.0% |
| Below the 52-week high | it is 15.6% below its highest point of the past year | 15.6% |
| Since a 20-day breakout | it made a new 20-day high about 7 trading days ago | 7 sessions |
| Since a 55-day breakout | it made a new 55-day high about 7 trading days ago | 7 sessions |
| All-time high | its highest closing price on record is $227.50 (set on 2026-08-14) | $227.50 |
| Given back of the 52-week move | over the past year its closes ranged ($87.56 to $225.53), and it has given back roughly a quarter of its rise from last year’s low — 24% of it. Chart-watchers call 61.8%-65% given back the "golden pocket" — for this company that is $135.85 to $140.27. It is watched widely enough that orders cluster there, which is the honest reason it matters; it is not a forecast. | 24.3% |
| From the all-time high | it is 15.6% below its all-time high | -15.6% |
| Nearest price level | it is trading 32.6% above a support level at $129.37 — a price it turned at three times since 2025-07-03, most recently on 2025-11-06. Since 2024-08-21 it has 15 such levels below the current price and 0 above. Levels like these describe where the price has reversed or paused before; they are not a forecast of where it will go. | -32.6% |
| All-time low | its lowest closing price on record is $7.99 (set on 2020-03-17) | $7.99 |
| Above the all-time low | it is 2303.1% above its all-time low | +2,303% |
Volatility
5
| Band width vs its own 6 months | day-to-day price swings are wider than usual versus its own recent 6-month history (wider than about 72% of it) | 72nd percentile |
|---|---|---|
| Typical daily range | in a typical session it travels about $9.33 between its high and its low — about 4.9% of its price. That is its "average true range" over the last 14 sessions, which also counts the distance from the previous close, so a day that opens well away from yesterday counts as the large move it was | $9.33 |
| Bollinger bands (20-day, ±2σ) | most of its recent trading has stayed between about $173.80 and $234.68 — the "Bollinger bands", a range drawn two standard deviations either side of its 20-day average price, which widens when the stock gets more volatile and narrows when it settles | $173.80 – $204.24 – $234.68 |
| Typical daily range (% of price) | its price moves about 4.9% in a typical session — about typical for the companies we cover. This is the average gap between a session's high and low over the last 14 sessions, counting overnight moves, expressed against the current price so it can be compared with companies trading at any price | 4.9% |
| Stretch from the 200-day average | it is trading 5.8 daily ranges above its 200-day average price (38.8% above it in plain percentage terms) — a way of asking how far it has stretched from its own average in units of how far it normally moves in a day, so a calm company and a jumpy one can be compared on the same scale | 5.8 daily ranges above its 200-day average |
Volume
1
| Volume vs its 30-day average | trading volume is about normal versus its 30-day average | 1.05× |
|---|
Analyst
2
| Change in the average price target | analysts have raised their average price target by 3.3% since the prior reading | +3.3% |
|---|---|---|
| Change in the consensus rating | the analyst consensus rating has softened toward "sell" since the prior reading | 0.04 toward sell |
Candlestick patterns
2
| Since a doji | 3 sessions ago it opened and closed at almost the same price after trading through a wider range — a "doji", the classic picture of buyers and sellers finishing the session level | 3 sessions ago |
|---|---|---|
| Since a bearish engulfing | 2 sessions ago it opened above the previous session's close and finished below that session's open — a "bearish engulfing" pair, where one down day more than undid the up day before it | 2 sessions ago |
Price gaps
3
| Gap at the open | it opened on 2026-08-21 0.3% above the previous session's close — an overnight gap, the part of the move that happened while the market was shut, and traded back through that level before the close | +0.3% |
|---|---|---|
| Open gap | it gapped 2.2% below the previous close 1 session ago and has not traded back through the level it left behind at 201.63 — an "unfilled gap", which describes a price range no trade has since crossed and is not a forecast that it will be crossed | -2.1% |
| Gap filled | a 3.3% gap up opened on 2026-08-07 has been "filled" 2 sessions ago — price traded back through the level the gap left behind, and it took 8 sessions to close | 2 sessions ago |
Price streaks
1
| Closing streak | it closed higher in its latest session, after a session that did not close higher — a single up day rather than a run | 1 session up |
|---|
Relative strength
4
| vs market, 1 month | over the past 1 month this stock lagged the market by 1.9 percentage points (the stock gained 0.4% while the market gained 2.3%) | -1.9% |
|---|---|---|
| vs market, 3 months | over the past 3 months this stock beat the market by 15.3 percentage points (the stock gained 18.4% while the market gained 3.1%) | +15.3% |
| vs market, 6 months | over the past 6 months this stock beat the market by 86.5 percentage points (the stock gained 97.6% while the market gained 11.1%) | +86.5% |
| vs market, 12 months | over the past 12 months this stock beat the market by 65.0 percentage points (the stock gained 85.4% while the market gained 20.5%) | +65.0% |
Signal agreement
2
| Bullish technical signals | 4 of the 9 technical signals we can compute for it are currently in a bullish state: a "golden cross" — its 50-day average is above its 200-day, trading above its 200-day average, outperforming the market over 6 months, near the bottom of its 14-day range (oversold) — these describe past price behaviour, not a forecast | 4 of 9 |
|---|---|---|
| Bearish technical signals | 2 of the 9 technical signals we can compute for it are currently in a bearish state: a strong downtrend, with sellers in control, MACD momentum is negative — these describe past price behaviour, not a forecast | 2 of 9 |
Trend (Ichimoku cloud)
1
| Vs the Ichimoku cloud | trading inside the Ichimoku cloud — a band drawn from where its own highs and lows sat up to 2026-07-16 and projected forward over today's price, the zone traders read as unresolved — neither side has established a trend, and the band is where that gets settled. The band itself is thick, spanning 16.3% of the share price, which is taken to mean a barrier that has held for a while and takes effort to cross. | 0.0% |
|---|
Volume-weighted price
2
| Vs this year’s average price paid | the price is 45% above the average price paid so far this year, so the typical buyer over that stretch is showing a gain. That average is $132.05 — a volume-weighted average of daily closes over 157 sessions, not a true tick-by-tick VWAP. | +45.4% |
|---|---|---|
| Vs the average paid since it last reported | the price is 1% above the average price paid since it last reported on 2026-06-03 (its 8-K), so the typical buyer over that stretch is showing a gain. That average is $189.37 — a volume-weighted average of daily closes over 53 sessions, not a true tick-by-tick VWAP. | +1.4% |
Price levels it has turned at before
CRWD last closed at $191.95 on 2026-08-21. Since 2024-08-21 it has turned at 15 prices below its last close and 0 above; the 3 nearest below are listed, nearest first.
| Level | Side | Distance | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| $129.37 | Support | 32.6% below the last close | turned there three times · 2025-07-03 to 2025-11-06 |
| $122.06 | Support | 36.4% below the last close | turned there five times · 2025-06-03 to 2026-01-27 |
| $119.12 | Support | 37.9% below the last close | turned there three times · 2025-10-07 to 2025-11-21 |
A level is a price this company reversed or paused at more than once — they describe past behaviour, not a forecast of where the price will go.
Wave structure
No Elliott-wave labelling currently fits its swings: the recent highs and lows do not satisfy the three rules a five-wave count has to obey, so there is no count to show rather than a count we are unsure about.
Read from daily closes as of 2026-08-21.
An Elliott-wave count describes the swings already printed and the level that would disprove it. It is not a forecast, a target, or advice.
Screens: Trading above the 200-day moving average · MACD just crossed bearish (12/26/9) · Analyst price target recently RAISED · beating the market · At the bottom of its 14-day range (stochastic below 20) · Trading inside the Ichimoku cloud | Learn: moving average · golden cross · adx · rsi · macd · breakout · fifty two week high low
Based on daily closing prices as of 2026-08-21. Describes past price behavior only — informational, not financial advice.
Analyst consensus
- Consensus ratingBuy (1.70 mean, 1=Strong Buy…5=Strong Sell) — 50 analysts
- Mean price target$199.55 range $103.25 – $256.00; median $200.00
Analyst estimates, as of 2026-08-19. These are third-party analyst opinions and price targets, aggregated — not a recommendation, prediction, or advice from stocks-llm. Informational only.
Analyst EPS estimate for CRWD
- Consensus EPS estimate$0.2917 next reporting period, as of 2026-08-19
Change over time is not available yet: it needs two readings of the same reporting period at least 30 days apart, and we have been recording these estimates since 2026-08-04. An estimate for a DIFFERENT quarter is not a revision, so a reading from before the last report is never compared with one after it.
The consensus estimate for the next reporting period, and how it has moved between readings of that SAME period. A change is measured only between readings estimating one period — when a company reports, the consensus moves to the next quarter and the two numbers are not comparable. Informational only, not a forecast and not advice.
Key risks (from latest filing)
["Adoption risk: Customers may remain committed to legacy on-premise security products, making customer acquisition and transition difficult despite cloud advantages","Market competition: Intensifying adversary tactics leveraging automation, identity abuse, and AI-powered attacks require continuous innovation to maintain competitive advantage","New customer acquisition dependency: Revenue and growth rates depend heavily on ability to attract new customers, and failure to do so would directly impact revenue trajectory"]
What changed in the latest 10-Q
AI-assisted comparison of CRWD's 10-Q filed 2026-06-04 against the prior one filed 2025-12-03.
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
- Added:
- Reference to Note 1 and Note 16 regarding revision of previously issued unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for the three months ended April 30, 2025 to correct an immaterial error discovered during fourth quarter of fiscal 2026
- Statement that 'The revisions are intended to ensure comparability across all periods reflected herein'
- Reference to 'Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 31, 2026' (instead of January 31, 2025)
- Description of 'single lightweight sensor' (newer) replacing 'single lightweight agent' (older)
- Comprehensive description of Falcon Flex enterprise licensing model in Go-To-Market Strategy section
- Expanded pricing description: 'per-endpoint, per-identity, per-cloud sensor, per-user, per-device, and per-gigabyte of daily ingestion'
- Mention of 'agentic interaction layer' in unified protection description
- Removed:
- Detailed description of direct sales team segmentation by customer endpoint count
- Reference to 'low-touch sales model' for prospecting
- Explanation of company origin as solution for large enterprises and subsequent expansion
- Statement about 'A substantial majority of our customers purchase subscriptions with a term over one year'
- Original broader Go-To-Market Strategy section describing sales team composition and structure
- Specific details about subscriptions 'generally priced on a per-endpoint and per-module basis'
- Complete July 19 Incident description and reference to Note 10 regarding lawsuits and claims
- Reworded:
- Go-To-Market Strategy introduction changed from detailed sales team structure to 'partner-first subscription model' language
- 'cloud modules' terminology replaced with 'modules' and 'products' in multiple places
- 'land-and-expand' described as 'low friction' in older version, now presented without that modifier
- Sales through 'direct sales team that leverages our network of channel partners' (older) changed to 'sales team supported by a robust partner ecosystem including resellers, MSSPs, system integrators, distributors, and cloud marketplace partners' (newer)
- Broader platform description now emphasizes 'unified protection across endpoints, cloud workloads, identities, SaaS environments, browsers, and the prompt and agentic interaction layer' versus older version's more general approach
- Notes:
- The July 19 Incident section appears truncated in both versions, making a complete comparison of changes to that section not fully assessable
- The newer filing references fiscal year ended January 31, 2026 versus older filing's January 31, 2025, reflecting different reporting periods
Risk Factors
- Added:
- In newer filing (2026-06-04): Reference to fiscal 2026 net losses of $162.5 million and fiscal 2025 net losses of $15.2 million, with net income of $72.2 million for fiscal 2024, and accumulated deficit of $1.3 billion as of April 30, 2026 in the profitability risk factor section.
- Removed:
- In older filing (2025-12-03): Detailed language stating 'We have incurred, and expect to continue to incur, significant costs and expenses related to the incident, including in connection with remediation efforts, customer and partner relations, measures taken to address the damage to our reputation, and other measures taken in response to the incident. Our management and other personnel have devoted, and may continue to devote, significant time and resources to address the impacts of the July 19 Incident. We also have hired, and in the future may hire, additional personnel to assist with our ongoing efforts. Any real or perceived failure, by us or the third-party service providers we engage, to remediate and respond to the July 19 Incident could adversely impact our business.'
- In older filing (2025-12-03): Language stating 'certain of our existing or prospective customers have elected to, and may in the future elect to, defer purchasing decisions relating to our products and services or not purchase our products and services at all. Customers have also decided, and may in the future decide, to terminate or not renew their agreements with us.'
- In older filing (2025-12-03): Language stating 'If we are unable to regain the trust of our current and prospective customers and partners, or if negative media coverage and publicity continues, whether directly or indirectly related to the July 19 Incident, our reputation and brand may suffer further, exacerbating the effects discussed herein.'
- Reworded:
- Newer filing (2026-06-04) uses 'have deferred or decided against purchases of our products and services and terminated or chosen not to renew their contracts with us' versus older filing's (2025-12-03) 'have elected to, and may in the future elect to, defer purchasing decisions relating to our products and services or not purchase our products and services at all. Customers have also decided, and may in the future decide, to terminate or not renew their agreements with us.' - more concise wording in newer version.
- Newer filing (2026-06-04) states 'Additional negative media coverage and publicity, whether directly or indirectly related to the July 19 Incident, may harm our reputation and brand further, exacerbating the effects discussed herein' versus older filing's (2025-12-03) 'If we are unable to regain the trust of our current and prospective customers and partners, or if negative media coverage and publicity continues, whether directly or indirectly related to the July 19 Incident, our reputation and brand may suffer further, exacerbating the effects discussed herein.' - removes conditional language about inability to regain trust and changes 'continues' to 'may harm'.
- Notes:
- The newer filing text appears truncated at 'accumulated deficit of $1.3 bi' and does not provide complete profitability section content for full comparison.
- Comparison limited to the portions of Risk Factors sections provided; sections may continue beyond the text supplied.
AI-assisted comparison of two SEC filing sections. It describes wording and theme changes only, makes no materiality, legal, or investment judgement, and is not financial advice. Informational only — not financial advice.
Insider activity (SEC Form 4)
0 open-market purchases and 897 open-market sales by insiders in the last 90 days.
- Last 30 days0 buys · 64 sells ($18M) — 2 selling insiders
- Last 90 days0 buys · 897 sells ($151M) — 8 selling insiders
- Last 180 days0 buys · 917 sells ($152M) — 8 selling insiders
Activity heuristic: net selling (a transparent product heuristic from the counts above, not a prediction or advice)
Most recent open-market transaction: 2026-08-03. As of 2026-08-25.
View full insider trading history → View SEC Form 3/4/5 filingsAsk about CRWD's insider activity →
Only open-market purchases (SEC code P) and sales (code S) are counted here. Option exercises, vesting/awards, gifts, and shares withheld for taxes are excluded — they are compensation or mechanical, not open-market conviction. Sales may be planned and non-discretionary (e.g. a Rule 10b5-1 plan) and are not necessarily bearish; open-market buying is not a recommendation to buy. Informational only — not financial advice.
Congressional trading disclosures
U.S. House members publicly disclose their own, their spouse's, and dependent children's stock transactions under the STOCK Act. We hold 15 matched disclosures for CRWD from U.S. House Clerk Periodic Transaction Report filings.
Congressional trading disclosures →Institutional ownership (13F)
6 institutional 13F filers reported holding CRWD as of 2026-03-31 (quarter-end position, filed within 45 days).
- Distinct 13F filers 6
- Reported shares held 40,931,090
- Reported value $15,979,907,155
reported quarterly holdings change (2025-12-31 → 2026-03-31): 1 new, 3 increased, 2 decreased, 0 exited. Change counts cover only managers that filed 13F reports in BOTH quarters, derived between two quarter-end snapshots — not same-day trades; a single manager is never said to have "bought" or "sold".
Institutional holdings are quarter-end long positions reported on SEC Form 13F-HR, filed up to 45 days after the quarter ends — they are delayed, are not real-time trades, exclude short positions and most non-US securities, and are not investment advice. Any increase/decrease is a reported change between two quarterly snapshots, not a same-day purchase or sale. These are quarter-end snapshots from the 13F filings on SEC EDGAR, filed within 45 days — not real-time, and any change is a difference between two quarterly reports, not a same-day trade. Informational only — not financial advice.
Short interest (FINRA)
CRWD had 25,560,208 shares of reported short interest as of the 2026-07-31 FINRA settlement date (delayed, bi-monthly; not real-time).
Short interest as a percent of shares outstanding is not shown for CRWD because we do not hold a verified share count to divide it by. The reported figures above are unaffected.
- Reported short interest (shares) 25,560,208
- Prior settlement (shares) 27,450,228
- Reported change -6.89%
- Days to cover (reported) 3.28
Reported to FINRA as of the 2026-07-31 settlement date. Short interest is reported to FINRA and published on a delayed, bi-monthly schedule (as of a settlement date, disseminated roughly eight business days later) — it is NOT real-time, does not cover every venue or all US trading, and is not a short-squeeze prediction or investment advice. Days-to-cover is the value FINRA reports; percent of float is not shown because the source file carries no share-count denominator — where a percent appears it is of shares OUTSTANDING, the larger base, and is therefore a floor on percent of float. Informational only — not financial advice.
Competitors & peers
- Palo Alto Networks (PANW)
- Fortinet (FTNT)
- Microsoft (MSFT)
- SentinelOne (S)
- Cisco (CSCO)
- Zscaler (ZS)
- Okta (OKTA)
- Splunk (SPLK)
AI-enriched competitor set. Linked names are companies covered by stocks-llm; other named peers are shown for reference only.
Compare CRWD vs…
CrowdStrike is found in…
Frequently asked questions
What does CrowdStrike (CRWD) do?
CrowdStrike is a cloud-native cybersecurity platform company founded in 2011 that delivers the AI-native Falcon platform for comprehensive threat detection and response. The Falcon platform is a unified, modular security solution accessible through a single lightweight sensor that collects and correlates trillions of cybersecurity events per week across endpoints, cloud workloads, identities, and enterprise data.
What sector is CrowdStrike (CRWD) in?
CrowdStrike (CRWD) is classified in the Information Technology sector. Its industry is Cloud-Native Cybersecurity Platforms. It trades on NASDAQ.
Who are CrowdStrike's (CRWD) competitors?
Notable peers of CrowdStrike (CRWD) include Palo Alto Networks, Fortinet, Microsoft, SentinelOne and Cisco. This peer set is informational only — not financial advice.
Has there been recent Congressional stock trading in CRWD?
Yes — we hold 15 matched STOCK Act disclosures for CRWD from U.S. House Clerk Periodic Transaction Report filings. These are legally-required disclosures (often filed 30–45 days after the trade), may belong to a U.S. House member, their spouse, or a dependent child, and are not an indicator of company performance or investment advice.
Is CrowdStrike (CRWD) overbought or oversold right now?
CrowdStrike (CRWD) is currently neither overbought nor oversold — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 43, in the neutral middle (as of 2026-08-21). RSI describes recent price momentum, not a forecast — informational only, not financial advice.
Where does stocks-llm's data on CRWD come from?
Fundamentals and prices come from market data, as of 2026-08-24; company filings and profile facts come from SEC EDGAR. All figures are delayed daily-close data shown with their as-of date — informational only, not financial advice.
Fundamentals: market data, as of 2026-08-24. Filings: SEC EDGAR. Prices are delayed daily-close data.
Last updated 2026-08-24.
Informational only — NOT financial advice. All figures are delayed daily-close data from SEC EDGAR & market data, shown with their as-of date.