ENCORE ENERGY CORP (EU)
Energy · Uranium exploration and development · NASDAQ
A speculative uranium exploration and development company pursuing in-situ recovery projects in the U.S. to capitalize on growing nuclear energy demand.
What ENCORE ENERGY CORP does
enCore Energy Corp is a uranium exploration and development company focused on acquiring, exploring, and developing uranium properties in the United States, with an emphasis on in-situ recovery (ISR) extraction methods. The company holds mineral properties and conducts delineation drilling and exploration activities adjacent to existing wellfields to establish resources and evaluate extraction potential. It operates in a speculative stage, with ongoing efforts to advance property development, secure regulatory approvals, and potentially monetize uranium holdings as part of its long-term investment strategy aligned with growing nuclear power demand.
Themes: Uranium mining / exploration, Nuclear fuel supply chain, In-situ recovery technology, Domestic uranium supply, Energy transition / clean energy
Fundamentals
- Price$1.24 as of 2026-08-24 close
- Market cap$241M as of 2026-08-24
- 1-year return-47.7% 2025-08-22 close $2.37 → 2026-08-24 close $1.24
- P/En/a negative earnings
- Net margin-63.0% as of 2026-08-24
- Gross margin+22.3% as of 2026-08-24
- ROE-10.9% as of 2026-08-24
- Debt / equity0.43 as of 2026-08-24
- Revenue growth (YoY)-6.4% as of 2026-08-24
- Revenue CAGR (3y)+116.6% SEC XBRL
- Beta1.75 as of 2026-08-24
- Last reported earnings2026-08-13 SEC EDGAR Form 8-K (Item 2.02)
How EU compares in its sector
- net profit marginbottom 10% 149 covered Energy peers, as of 2026-08-24
- operating marginbottom 10% 149 covered Energy peers, as of 2026-08-24
- gross marginmiddle range 142 covered Energy peers, as of 2026-08-24
- return on equitybottom 25% 152 covered Energy peers, as of 2026-08-24
- 3-year revenue CAGRtop 10% 138 covered Energy peers
- free cash flow (absolute dollars, latest fiscal year)bottom 25% 95 covered Energy peers, as of FY2025
Position among covered Energy companies that report each metric (minimum 5 peers). A relative position within our covered catalog — not a valuation, quality, or investment judgment. A higher percentile is simply a higher value (for P/E, more expensive on earnings — never "better"). Informational only.
How ENCORE ENERGY CORP looks technically
ENCORE ENERGY CORP (EU) is trading 41.3% below its 200-day average, the long-term trend line — a long-term downtrend. Its 50-day average crossed below its 200-day average about 110 trading days ago — a "death cross", a bearish long-term signal. There is no clear trend right now — the price is choppy (ADX, a 0–100 trend-strength gauge, is 20, below the 25 that marks a real trend). Momentum is neutral — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 50, neither overbought (above 70) nor oversold (below 30). MACD, a trend-momentum gauge, turned bearish about 3 trading days ago (its momentum flipped negative). It made a new 20-day low about 2 trading days ago. It is 71.3% below its highest point of the past year.
Trend
8
| Distance from the 200-day | it is trading 41.3% below its 200-day average, the long-term trend line — a long-term downtrend | -41.4% |
|---|---|---|
| 50-day moving average | its average price over the last 50 trading days — a short-term trend line — is $1.27 | $1.27 |
| 200-day moving average | its average price over the last 200 trading days — the long-term trend line — is $2.05 | $2.05 |
| Swing structure | each recent peak has been lower than the one before it and each dip deeper — the pattern chart-watchers call a downtrend, which describes where price has already been and not where it goes next | lower highs and lower lows |
| Last swing turn | its last significant turn was a swing high 9 calendar days ago — the swings before that are what the structure reading is measured on | 9 sessions |
| Wave structure | its recent swings can be read as a five-part downward sequence — what Elliott-wave chartists call an impulse — now in leg 3 of five; the labelling fails if price closes above 1.44. It is one of several labellings that fit, and it describes the swings already printed, not what comes next. The same swings also read as a three-part correction in leg C. | possible downward five-wave sequence, in wave 3 (one of several readings) |
| Since the 50/200 cross | its 50-day average crossed below its 200-day average about 110 trading days ago — a "death cross", a bearish long-term signal | 110 sessions |
| Trend strength (14-day ADX) | there is no clear trend right now — the price is choppy (ADX, a 0–100 trend-strength gauge, is 20, below the 25 that marks a real trend) | 19.5 |
Momentum
3
| 14-day RSI | momentum is neutral — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 50, neither overbought (above 70) nor oversold (below 30) | 50.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Position in its 14-day range | it is trading in the lower half of its 14-day range ($1.03 to $1.44) — its "stochastic" reading is 41 out of 100, where 0 would mean closing exactly at the 14-session low and 100 exactly at the high. This measures WHERE the price sits inside its recent range, which is a different question from the RSI beside it: RSI is a momentum gauge, measuring how FAST the price has been moving, so a stock can drift quietly to the bottom of its range with an ordinary RSI, or fall sharply and still sit in the middle. It has been climbing within that range over the last few sessions. | 41.5 |
| Since the MACD crossed zero | MACD, a trend-momentum gauge, turned bearish about 3 trading days ago (its momentum flipped negative) | 3 sessions |
Range
12
| 52-week high | its highest closing price over the past year (about 252 trading days) was $4.18 | $4.18 |
|---|---|---|
| From the 52-week high | it is 71.3% below its 52-week high (its highest price of the past year) | -71.3% |
| Above the 52-week low | it is 16.5% above its 52-week low (its lowest price of the past year) | +16.5% |
| Below the 52-week high | it is 71.3% below its highest point of the past year | 71.3% |
| Since a 20-day breakout | it made a new 20-day low about 2 trading days ago | 2 sessions |
| Since a 55-day breakout | it made a new 55-day low about 2 trading days ago | 2 sessions |
| All-time high | its highest closing price on record is $9.27 (set on 2011-02-04) | $9.27 |
| Given back of the 52-week move | over the past year its closes ranged ($1.04 to $4.07), and it has recovered only a small part of its fall from last year’s high — 5% of it. Chart-watchers call 61.8%-65% given back the "golden pocket" — for this company that is $2.91 to $3.01. It is watched widely enough that orders cluster there, which is the honest reason it matters; it is not a forecast. | 5.1% |
| From the all-time high | it is 87.1% below its all-time high | -87.1% |
| Nearest price level | it is trading 5.0% below a resistance level at $1.26 — a price it turned at twice since 2025-03-03, most recently on 2026-06-09. Since 2024-08-21 it has 0 such levels below the current price and 16 above. Levels like these describe where the price has reversed or paused before; they are not a forecast of where it will go. | +5.0% |
| All-time low | its lowest closing price on record is $0.03 (set on 2014-09-12) | $0.03 |
| Above the all-time low | it is 3900.0% above its all-time low | +3,900% |
Volatility
5
| Band width vs its own 6 months | day-to-day price swings are about average versus its own recent 6-month history | 52nd percentile |
|---|---|---|
| Typical daily range | in a typical session it travels about $0.0959 between its high and its low — about 8.0% of its price. That is its "average true range" over the last 14 sessions, which also counts the distance from the previous close, so a day that opens well away from yesterday counts as the large move it was | $0.0959 |
| Bollinger bands (20-day, ±2σ) | most of its recent trading has stayed between about $0.98 and $1.36 — the "Bollinger bands", a range drawn two standard deviations either side of its 20-day average price, which widens when the stock gets more volatile and narrows when it settles | $0.98 – $1.17 – $1.36 |
| Typical daily range (% of price) | its price moves about 8.0% in a typical session — more volatile than most companies we cover. This is the average gap between a session's high and low over the last 14 sessions, counting overnight moves, expressed against the current price so it can be compared with companies trading at any price | 8.0% |
| Stretch from the 200-day average | it is trading 8.8 daily ranges below its 200-day average price (41.4% below it in plain percentage terms) — a way of asking how far it has stretched from its own average in units of how far it normally moves in a day, so a calm company and a jumpy one can be compared on the same scale | 8.8 daily ranges below its 200-day average |
Volume
1
| Volume vs its 30-day average | trading volume is about normal versus its 30-day average | 1.27× |
|---|
Analyst
2
| Change in the average price target | analysts have cut their average price target by 14.1% since the prior reading | -14.1% |
|---|---|---|
| Change in the consensus rating | not available for this company yet | n/a |
Candlestick patterns
1
| Since a bearish engulfing | 1 session ago it opened above the previous session's close and finished below that session's open — a "bearish engulfing" pair, where one down day more than undid the up day before it | 1 session ago |
|---|
Price gaps
3
| Gap at the open | it opened on 2026-08-21 0.5% above the previous session's close — an overnight gap, the part of the move that happened while the market was shut, and had not traded back through that level by the close | +0.5% |
|---|---|---|
| Open gap | it gapped 7.6% below the previous close 6 sessions ago and has not traded back through the level it left behind at 1.38 — an "unfilled gap", which describes a price range no trade has since crossed and is not a forecast that it will be crossed | -7.6% |
| Gap filled | a 2.5% gap down opened on 2026-08-18 has been "filled" 3 sessions ago — price traded back through the level the gap left behind, and it closed again during the very session that opened it | 3 sessions ago |
Price streaks
1
| Closing streak | it closed higher in its latest session, after a session that did not close higher — a single up day rather than a run | 1 session up |
|---|
Relative strength
4
| vs market, 1 month | over the past 1 month this stock lagged the market by 4.0 percentage points (the stock lost 1.6% while the market gained 2.3%) | -4.0% |
|---|---|---|
| vs market, 3 months | over the past 3 months this stock lagged the market by 21.5 percentage points (the stock lost 18.4% while the market gained 3.1%) | -21.5% |
| vs market, 6 months | over the past 6 months this stock lagged the market by 65.3 percentage points (the stock lost 54.2% while the market gained 11.1%) | -65.3% |
| vs market, 12 months | over the past 12 months this stock lagged the market by 66.2 percentage points (the stock lost 45.7% while the market gained 20.5%) | -66.2% |
Signal agreement
2
| Bullish technical signals | 0 of the 9 technical signals we can compute for it are currently in a bullish state — these describe past price behaviour, not a forecast | 0 of 9 |
|---|---|---|
| Bearish technical signals | 6 of the 9 technical signals we can compute for it are currently in a bearish state: a "death cross" — its 50-day average is below its 200-day, trading below its 200-day average, a fresh 20-day low, MACD momentum is negative, lagging the market over 6 months, trading below the Ichimoku cloud — these describe past price behaviour, not a forecast | 6 of 9 |
Trend (Ichimoku cloud)
1
| Vs the Ichimoku cloud | trading 12% below the Ichimoku cloud — a band drawn from where its own highs and lows sat up to 2026-07-16 and projected forward over today's price, the side traders read as an established downtrend, with the band above acting as the level that would have to be cleared. The band itself is thick, spanning 17.7% of the share price, which is taken to mean a barrier that has held for a while and takes effort to cross. | -11.6% |
|---|
Volume-weighted price
1
| Vs this year’s average price paid | the price is 38% below the average price paid so far this year, so the typical buyer over that stretch is under water. That average is $1.92 — a volume-weighted average of daily closes over 160 sessions, not a true tick-by-tick VWAP. | -37.5% |
|---|
Price levels it has turned at before
EU last closed at $1.20 on 2026-08-21. Since 2024-08-21 it has turned at 0 prices below its last close and 16 above; the 3 nearest above are listed, nearest first.
| Level | Side | Distance | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.26 | Resistance | 5.0% above the last close | turned there twice · 2025-03-03 to 2026-06-09 |
| $1.34 | Resistance | 11.7% above the last close | turned there twice · 2025-03-13 to 2026-05-19 |
| $1.67 | Resistance | 38.8% above the last close | turned there twice · 2026-03-20 to 2026-03-30 |
A level is a price this company reversed or paused at more than once — they describe past behaviour, not a forecast of where the price will go.
Wave structure
Its recent swings can be read as a five-part downward sequence — what Elliott-wave chartists call an impulse — now in leg 3 of five.
This labelling fails — stops being a possible reading at all — if it closes above $1.44.
This is one of several labellings that fit the same swings, so treat it as a reading rather than the reading. It was chosen from 2 labellings that survived the rules, counting shorter readings of the same bars.
On past moves of this shape the leg has usually ended somewhere between $0.2103 and $0.68 — that is where it has tended to end if the count holds, not a forecast of where the price goes.
Alternate reading: The same swings also read as a three-part correction in leg C, which fails on a close above $1.44.
This reading has stood for 2 trading days, since 2026-08-20.
Read from daily closes as of 2026-08-21.
An Elliott-wave count describes the swings already printed and the level that would disprove it. It is not a forecast, a target, or advice.
Screens: Trading below the 200-day moving average · Pulled back from the 12-month high · Broke down to a new 20-day low · MACD just crossed bearish (12/26/9) · trendless / choppy (low ADX) · Analyst price target recently CUT | Learn: moving average · golden cross · adx · rsi · macd · breakout · fifty two week high low
Based on daily closing prices as of 2026-08-21. Describes past price behavior only — informational, not financial advice.
Analyst consensus
- Consensus ratingStrong Buy (1.17 mean, 1=Strong Buy…5=Strong Sell) — 4 analysts
- Mean price target$3.32 range $2.50 – $4.27; median $3.25
Analyst estimates, as of 2026-08-19. These are third-party analyst opinions and price targets, aggregated — not a recommendation, prediction, or advice from stocks-llm. Informational only.
Analyst EPS estimate for EU
- Consensus EPS estimate-C$0.1595 next reporting period, as of 2026-08-19
Change over time is not available yet: it needs two readings of the same reporting period at least 30 days apart, and we have been recording these estimates since 2026-08-04. An estimate for a DIFFERENT quarter is not a revision, so a reading from before the last report is never compared with one after it.
The consensus estimate for the next reporting period, and how it has moved between readings of that SAME period. A change is measured only between readings estimating one period — when a company reports, the consensus moves to the next quarter and the two numbers are not comparable. Informational only, not a forecast and not advice.
Key risks (from latest filing)
["Uranium market price volatility and dependence on spot/long-term contract pricing for project economics; significant exposure to global uranium supply/demand fluctuations and nuclear power adoption rates.","Regulatory and permitting risk: Company requires multiple governmental approvals, permits, and licenses for exploration, development, and extraction operations; delays or denials could materially impact project timelines and viability.","Operational and funding risk: Current unprofitability, negative cash flow, and dependence on ability to raise additional capital; insufficient working capital could limit planned activities and exploration programs."]
What changed in the latest 10-Q
AI-assisted comparison of EU's 10-Q filed 2026-05-14 against the prior one filed 2025-11-10.
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
- Added:
- Newer filing (2026-05-14) states: 'As of January 1, 2025, the Company ceased to be a "foreign private issuer" and has become a "domestic issuer" within the meanings under the Exchange Act' (removed filer status detail)
- Newer filing (2026-05-14) added: 'In January 2026, the DOE awarded $900 million each to Centrus Energy Corp., General Matter, Inc. and Orano' for enrichment capacity expansion
- Newer filing (2026-05-14) added: 'On January 15, 2026, U.S. Senators Jeanne Shaheen and Todd Young...introduced new bipartisan, bicameral legislation to support domestic supply chains for critical minerals through the creation of a new Strategic Resilience Reserve (SRR)'
- Newer filing (2026-05-14) added: 'President Donald Trump's signing the proclamation on January 14, 2026 to address national security threats posed by imports of processed critical minerals'
- Newer filing (2026-05-14) added: 'During the three months ended March 31, 2026, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) formally announced a major agency-wide reorganization'
- Newer filing (2026-05-14) added: 'In January 2026, U.S based tech company Meta signed deals with existing and new nuclear power providers to supply up to 6.6 giga watt of nuclear power by 2035'
- Newer filing (2026-05-14) added: 'U.S. energy company Vistra has entered into 20-year power purchase agreement to provide more than 2,600 mega watts' (text truncated in newer filing)
- Removed:
- Older filing (2025-11-10) stated filer classification as 'large accelerated filer' - removed in newer filing (2026-05-14) which states 'non-accelerated filer'
- Older filing (2025-11-10) referenced 'Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024' - newer filing (2026-05-14) references 'Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2025'
- Older filing (2025-11-10) stated 'In 2024, the Company commenced uranium extraction' - newer filing (2026-05-14) states 'In 2023, the Company commenced uranium extraction'
- Older filing (2025-11-10) listed 'Diablo Canyon' among reactors positioned to re-enter service - removed from newer filing (2026-05-14)
- Older filing (2025-11-10) included detailed discussion of January 20, 2025 Trump Executive Orders ('Unleashing American Energy' and 'Declaring a National Energy Emergency') and Chris Wright's confirmation as Energy Secretary - entirely removed from newer filing (2026-05-14)
- Older filing (2025-11-10) included bullet points about DOE pilot program for advanced nuclear reactors and fuel production lines - removed from newer filing (2026-05-14)
- Older filing (2025-11-10) included bullet point about Idaho National Laboratory and Microsoft collaboration on nuclear permitting and licensing - removed from newer filing (2026-05-14)
- Reworded:
- WNA data updated: Older filing (2025-11-10) stated 'as of May 2025, there were 439 operable nuclear reactors' vs. newer filing (2026-05-14) states 'as of April 2026, there were 438 operable nuclear reactors'
- Uranium demand range slightly adjusted: Older filing (2025-11-10) stated '175 to 180 million pounds' vs. newer filing (2026-05-14) states '178 to 180 million pounds'
- Language change: Older filing (2025-11-10) stated 'Expanding the current reactor fleet to meet that level of electrical generating capacity' vs. newer filing (2026-05-14) states 'Expanding the current reactor fleet to meet the levels of electrical generating capacity'
- Nasdaq name format: Older filing (2025-11-10) stated 'The Nasdaq Capital Market LLC' vs. newer filing (2026-05-14) states 'Nasdaq Capital Market LLC' (removed 'The')
- Exploration Stage Issuer definition language refined: Older filing (2025-11-10) included 'and as required by the SEC' clause not present in newer filing (2026-05-14)
- Notes:
- Newer filing text appears truncated at 'U.S. energy company Vistra has entered into 20-year power purchase agreement to provide more than 2,600 mega watts of' - comparison of complete bullet point not possible
- Both filings appear to have page number changes (older shows page 43, newer shows page 30), suggesting different section lengths or formatting
Risk Factors
- Added:
- Added to newer filing (2026-05-14): reference to 'distribution of common shares of Verdera' in the forward-looking statements section
- Added to newer filing (2026-05-14): 'the availability of our employees, contractors and subcontractors to continue operations' as a material assumption (reworded from older version)
- Removed:
- Removed from newer filing (2026-05-14): reference to 'Going Public Transaction (as defined below)' that appeared in older filing (2025-11-10)
- Removed from newer filing (2026-05-14): statement that 'the Company's belief it is positioned to meet the increased demand for clean, reliable nuclear energy' from the forward-looking statements section
- Reworded:
- Changed in newer filing (2026-05-14): 'Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements' in older filing (2025-11-10) changed to 'Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements'
- Changed in newer filing (2026-05-14): 'operational expansion' in older filing (2025-11-10) changed to 'operational expansion and exploration'
- Changed in newer filing (2026-05-14): 'ability to complete, to shareholders of the Company and business prospects, expectations regarding continuation of delineation drilling adjacent to existing wellfields continuing' removed and replaced with simpler wording 'the ability to complete, and the timing of completion of a distribution of common shares of Verdera (as defined below), and the ability to meet expectations regarding the continuation of delineation drilling adjacent to existing wellfields'
- Changed in newer filing (2026-05-14): 'our employees, contractors and subcontractors will be available to continue operations' in older filing (2025-11-10) changed to 'the availability of our employees, contractors and subcontractors to continue operations' with removal of 'will be'
- Notes:
- The newer filing text appears truncated at the end ('risks associated with exploration of, development of, and extrac'), preventing full comparison of the complete Risk Factors section
- Page numbering differs between filings (newer starts at page 42 for Item 1A vs older at page 59), but this reflects document formatting rather than content substantive changes
AI-assisted comparison of two SEC filing sections. It describes wording and theme changes only, makes no materiality, legal, or investment judgement, and is not financial advice. Informational only — not financial advice.
Insider activity (SEC Form 4)
4 open-market purchases and 0 open-market sales by insiders in the last 90 days.
- Last 90 days4 buys ($251284) · 0 sells — 3 buying insiders
- Last 180 days7 buys ($397284) · 0 sells — 4 buying insiders
Cluster buying: 4 different insiders reported open-market purchases (SEC code P) of EU within a 30-day window between 2026-05-18 and 2026-06-12. Disclosed Form 4 activity, not a prediction of performance or a buy signal.
Activity heuristic: net buying (a transparent product heuristic from the counts above, not a prediction or advice)
Most recent open-market transaction: 2026-06-12. As of 2026-08-25.
View full insider trading history → View SEC Form 3/4/5 filingsAsk about EU's insider activity →
Only open-market purchases (SEC code P) and sales (code S) are counted here. Option exercises, vesting/awards, gifts, and shares withheld for taxes are excluded — they are compensation or mechanical, not open-market conviction. Sales may be planned and non-discretionary (e.g. a Rule 10b5-1 plan) and are not necessarily bearish; open-market buying is not a recommendation to buy. Informational only — not financial advice.
Institutional ownership (13F)
4 institutional 13F filers reported holding EU as of 2026-03-31 (quarter-end position, filed within 45 days).
- Distinct 13F filers 4
- Reported shares held 14,300,844
- Reported value $25,741,520
reported quarterly holdings change (2025-12-31 → 2026-03-31): 0 new, 0 increased, 4 decreased, 0 exited. Change counts cover only managers that filed 13F reports in BOTH quarters, derived between two quarter-end snapshots — not same-day trades; a single manager is never said to have "bought" or "sold".
Institutional holdings are quarter-end long positions reported on SEC Form 13F-HR, filed up to 45 days after the quarter ends — they are delayed, are not real-time trades, exclude short positions and most non-US securities, and are not investment advice. Any increase/decrease is a reported change between two quarterly snapshots, not a same-day purchase or sale. These are quarter-end snapshots from the 13F filings on SEC EDGAR, filed within 45 days — not real-time, and any change is a difference between two quarterly reports, not a same-day trade. Informational only — not financial advice.
Short interest (FINRA)
EU had 35,363,825 shares of reported short interest as of the 2026-07-31 FINRA settlement date (delayed, bi-monthly; not real-time).
EU had 18.2% of its shares outstanding sold short as of the 2026-07-31 FINRA settlement date (percent of FLOAT would be higher — float is not disclosed in the source). FINRA reported 13.79 days to cover at the same settlement.
- Reported short interest (shares) 35,363,825
- Short interest (% of shares outstanding) 18.2%
- Prior settlement (shares) 31,973,736
- Reported change 10.6%
- Days to cover (reported) 13.79
Reported to FINRA as of the 2026-07-31 settlement date. Short interest is reported to FINRA and published on a delayed, bi-monthly schedule (as of a settlement date, disseminated roughly eight business days later) — it is NOT real-time, does not cover every venue or all US trading, and is not a short-squeeze prediction or investment advice. Days-to-cover is the value FINRA reports; percent of float is not shown because the source file carries no share-count denominator — where a percent appears it is of shares OUTSTANDING, the larger base, and is therefore a floor on percent of float. Informational only — not financial advice.
Competitors & peers
- Sprott Physical Uranium Trust (SRUUF)
- Cameco (CCJ)
- Kazatomprom
- Energy Fuels (UUUU)
- Ur-Energy (URG)
- Denison Mines (DNN)
AI-enriched competitor set. Linked names are companies covered by stocks-llm; other named peers are shown for reference only.
Compare EU vs…
Frequently asked questions
What does ENCORE ENERGY CORP (EU) do?
enCore Energy Corp is a uranium exploration and development company focused on acquiring, exploring, and developing uranium properties in the United States, with an emphasis on in-situ recovery (ISR) extraction methods. The company holds mineral properties and conducts delineation drilling and exploration activities adjacent to existing wellfields to establish resources and evaluate extraction potential.
What sector is ENCORE ENERGY CORP (EU) in?
ENCORE ENERGY CORP (EU) is classified in the Energy sector. Its industry is Uranium exploration and development. It trades on NASDAQ.
Who are ENCORE ENERGY CORP's (EU) competitors?
Notable peers of ENCORE ENERGY CORP (EU) include Sprott Physical Uranium Trust, Cameco, Kazatomprom, Energy Fuels and Ur-Energy. This peer set is informational only — not financial advice.
Is ENCORE ENERGY CORP (EU) overbought or oversold right now?
ENCORE ENERGY CORP (EU) is currently neither overbought nor oversold — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 50, in the neutral middle (as of 2026-08-21). RSI describes recent price momentum, not a forecast — informational only, not financial advice.
Where does stocks-llm's data on EU come from?
Fundamentals and prices come from market data, as of 2026-08-24; company filings and profile facts come from SEC EDGAR. All figures are delayed daily-close data shown with their as-of date — informational only, not financial advice.
Fundamentals: market data, as of 2026-08-24. Filings: SEC EDGAR. Prices are delayed daily-close data.
Last updated 2026-08-24.
Informational only — NOT financial advice. All figures are delayed daily-close data from SEC EDGAR & market data, shown with their as-of date.