GLOBAL NET LEASE INC (GNL)
Real Estate · Diversified REITs · NYSE
A diversified, global REIT specializing in mission-critical, net-leased commercial properties across the US and Europe.
What GLOBAL NET LEASE INC does
Global Net Lease, Inc. is a publicly traded real estate investment trust (REIT) focused on acquiring and managing a global portfolio of commercial real estate. The company primarily invests in single-tenant, mission-critical net-leased properties, including industrial, office, and retail assets, with operations diversified across the United States and Europe.
Themes: net-lease real estate, commercial property management, industrial real estate, office real estate, retail real estate
Fundamentals
- Price$7.12 as of 2026-10-21 close
- Market cap$1.5B as of 2026-08-03 (share count; price 2026-10-21)
- 1-year return-6.6% 2025-10-21 close $7.62 → 2026-10-21 close $7.12
- P/En/a negative earnings
- Net margin-45.5% FY2025, SEC XBRL
- ROE-13.6% FY2025, SEC XBRL
- ROICn/a No figure: its pre-tax income was zero or negative, so there is no tax rate to apply.
- Debt / equityn/a No figure: its filing reports debt under a line we do not read, so a total would be understated.
- Revenue growth (YoY)-13.1% FY2025, SEC XBRL
- Revenue CAGR (3y)+9.3% SEC XBRL
- Beta0.45 as of 2026-09-03
- Last reported earnings2026-08-05 SEC EDGAR Form 8-K (Item 2.02)
Dividend: yield +8.7%; 1-year non-decreasing per-share dividend streak (SEC XBRL).
How GNL compares in its sector
- net profit marginbottom 10% 154 covered Real Estate peers, as of 2026-09-03
- operating marginmiddle range 96 covered Real Estate peers, as of 2026-09-03
- return on equitybottom 10% 158 covered Real Estate peers, as of 2026-09-03
- 3-year revenue CAGRmiddle range 155 covered Real Estate peers
- indicated dividend yieldtop 10% 132 covered Real Estate peers, as of 2026-09-03
Position among covered Real Estate companies that report each metric (minimum 5 peers). A relative position within our covered catalog — not a valuation, quality, or investment judgment. A higher percentile is simply a higher value (for P/E, more expensive on earnings — never "better"). Informational only.
Dividend coverage (FY2025)
Covered by reported results. In FY2025, GNL's dividend was covered by reported results (operating-cash-flow payout 86%). This describes past coverage, not a forecast.
- Earnings payoutnot assessable earnings were not positive that year
- Operating-cash-flow payout86% dividends / operating cash flow — capital spending was not reported, so this does not subtract it
Coverage derived from reported SEC EDGAR XBRL figures for FY2025 (dividends paid vs. net income and free cash flow, same fiscal year). This describes PAST coverage for one fiscal year — it does not predict whether a dividend will be maintained, raised, or cut, and a one-year payout ratio can be distorted by non-recurring items. Informational only — not financial advice.
Quarterly results
| Quarter | Revenue | Operating income | Net income | Diluted EPS | Operating cash flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 FY2026 2026-06-30 | $112M | $55M | $3M | -$0.04 | $67M† |
| Q1 FY2026 2026-03-31 | $109M | $31M | -$5M | -$0.08 | $40M |
| Q4 FY2025 2025-12-31 | $117M† | $111M† | $48M† | $0.16† | $56M† |
| Q3 FY2025 2025-09-30 | $121M | -$14M | -$60M | -$0.32 | $56M† |
| Q2 FY2025 2025-06-30 | $125M | $42M | -$24M | -$0.16 | $52M† |
| Q1 FY2025 2025-03-31 | $132M | -$28M | -$189M | -$0.87 | $59M |
| Q4 FY2024 2024-12-31 | $138M† | $56M† | -$7M† | -$0.07† | $75M† |
| Q3 FY2024 2024-09-30 | $139M | $13M | -$66M | -$0.33 | $62M† |
† Not filed as a discrete quarter: derived from the company's own year-to-date figures (for example the fourth quarter as the fiscal year minus the first nine months). A derived per-share figure is approximate, because the share count moves within the year.
Balance sheet at 2026-06-30
- Cash and equivalents$154M
- Total debtnot shown the filing reports its long-term debt in a form we do not read yet
From the company's own SEC 10-Q and 10-K filings (XBRL), re-read every week. Figures in US dollars as filed; informational only — not financial advice.
How GLOBAL NET LEASE INC looks technically
GLOBAL NET LEASE INC (GNL) is trading 21.9% below its 200-day average, the long-term trend line — a long-term downtrend. Its 50-day average crossed below its 200-day average about 44 trading days ago — a "death cross", a bearish long-term signal. A strong downtrend is in place — ADX, a 0–100 trend-strength gauge, is 50, with sellers in control. Momentum is beaten down — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 11, in oversold territory (below 30). It just made a new 20-day low, breaking below its recent trading range. It is 1.0% above its 52-week low (its lowest price of the past year).
Trend
8
| Distance from the 200-day | it is trading 21.9% below its 200-day average, the long-term trend line — a long-term downtrend | -21.9% |
|---|---|---|
| 50-day moving average | its average price over the last 50 trading days — a short-term trend line — is $8.57 | $8.57 |
| 200-day moving average | its average price over the last 200 trading days — the long-term trend line — is $9.12 | $9.12 |
| Swing structure | its recent peaks and dips disagree — one of them is rising while the other is not, so there is no clean up or down pattern in the swings | mixed — one of the two is not confirming |
| Last swing turn | its last significant turn was a swing high 50 calendar days ago — the swings before that are what the structure reading is measured on | 50 sessions |
| Wave structure | its recent swings can be read as a completed three-part upward correction — a pullback in the A-B-C shape Elliott-wave chartists use; the labelling fails if price closes above 9.325. It is the only labelling that fits, and it describes the swings already printed, not what comes next. | possible three-wave upward correction, complete |
| Since the 50/200 cross | its 50-day average crossed below its 200-day average about 44 trading days ago — a "death cross", a bearish long-term signal | 44 sessions |
| Trend strength (14-day ADX) | a strong downtrend is in place — ADX, a 0–100 trend-strength gauge, is 50, with sellers in control | 50.2 |
Momentum
3
| 14-day RSI | momentum is beaten down — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 11, in oversold territory (below 30) | 11.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Position in its 14-day range | it is trading near the bottom of its 14-day range ($7.05 to $8.40) — its "stochastic" reading is 5 out of 100, where 0 would mean closing exactly at the 14-session low and 100 exactly at the high. This measures WHERE the price sits inside its recent range, which is a different question from the RSI beside it: RSI is a momentum gauge, measuring how FAST the price has been moving, so a stock can drift quietly to the bottom of its range with an ordinary RSI, or fall sharply and still sit in the middle. It has been slipping within that range over the last few sessions. | 5.2 |
| Since the MACD crossed zero | MACD, a trend-momentum gauge, is in negative territory (momentum leaning bearish) | 31 sessions |
Range
12
| 52-week high | its highest closing price over the past year (about 252 trading days) was $10.04 | $10.04 |
|---|---|---|
| From the 52-week high | it is 29.1% below its 52-week high (its highest price of the past year) | -29.1% |
| Above the 52-week low | it is 1.0% above its 52-week low (its lowest price of the past year) | +1.0% |
| Below the 52-week high | it is 29.1% below its highest point of the past year | 29.1% |
| Since a 20-day breakout | it just made a new 20-day low, breaking below its recent trading range | 1 session |
| Since a 55-day breakout | it just made a new 55-day low, breaking below its recent trading range | 1 session |
| All-time high | its highest closing price on record is $30.24 (set on 2015-06-02) | $30.24 |
| Given back of the 52-week move | over the past year its closes ranged ($7.12 to $9.96), and it has recovered essentially none of its fall from last year’s high — 0% of it. Chart-watchers call 61.8%-65% given back the "golden pocket" — for this company that is $8.88 to $8.97. It is watched widely enough that orders cluster there, which is the honest reason it matters; it is not a forecast. | 0.0% |
| From the all-time high | it is 76.5% below its all-time high | -76.5% |
| Nearest price level | it is trading 0.5% below a resistance level at $7.16 — a price it turned at three times since 2024-11-19, most recently on 2025-06-17. Since 2024-10-21 it has 2 such levels below the current price and 11 above. Levels like these describe where the price has reversed or paused before; they are not a forecast of where it will go. | +0.5% |
| All-time low | its lowest closing price on record is $6.51 (set on 2025-04-09) | $6.51 |
| Above the all-time low | it is 9.4% above its all-time low | +9.4% |
Volatility
5
| Band width vs its own 6 months | day-to-day price swings are unusually wide versus its own recent history (wider than about 99% of the past ~6 months) | 99th percentile |
|---|---|---|
| Typical daily range | in a typical session it travels about $0.1931 between its high and its low — about 2.7% of its price. That is its "average true range" over the last 14 sessions, which also counts the distance from the previous close, so a day that opens well away from yesterday counts as the large move it was | $0.1931 |
| Bollinger bands (20-day, ±2σ) | most of its recent trading has stayed between about $7.04 and $8.80 — the "Bollinger bands", a range drawn two standard deviations either side of its 20-day average price, which widens when the stock gets more volatile and narrows when it settles | $7.04 – $7.92 – $8.80 |
| Typical daily range (% of price) | its price moves about 2.7% in a typical session — calmer than most companies we cover. This is the average gap between a session's high and low over the last 14 sessions, counting overnight moves, expressed against the current price so it can be compared with companies trading at any price | 2.7% |
| Stretch from the 200-day average | it is trading 10.4 daily ranges below its 200-day average price (21.9% below it in plain percentage terms) — a way of asking how far it has stretched from its own average in units of how far it normally moves in a day, so a calm company and a jumpy one can be compared on the same scale | 10.4 daily ranges below its 200-day average |
Volume
1
| Volume vs its 30-day average | trading volume is about normal versus its 30-day average | 1.27× |
|---|
Analyst
2
| Change in the average price target | analysts have cut their average price target by 1.4% since the prior reading | -1.4% |
|---|---|---|
| Change in the consensus rating | not available for this company yet | n/a |
Candlestick patterns
4
| Since a doji | 1 session ago it opened and closed at almost the same price after trading through a wider range — a "doji", the classic picture of buyers and sellers finishing the session level | 1 session ago |
|---|---|---|
| Since a hammer | 9 sessions ago, after a stretch of decline, it sold off hard during the session and then closed back near its high — a "hammer", the long lower wick showing the drop was bought back before the close | 9 sessions ago |
| Since a bullish engulfing | 7 sessions ago it opened below the previous session's close and finished above that session's open — a "bullish engulfing" pair, where one up day more than undid the down day before it | 7 sessions ago |
| Since a bearish engulfing | 6 sessions ago it opened above the previous session's close and finished below that session's open — a "bearish engulfing" pair, where one down day more than undid the up day before it | 6 sessions ago |
Price gaps
3
| Gap at the open | it opened on 2026-10-21 0.3% above the previous session's close — an overnight gap, the part of the move that happened while the market was shut, and traded back through that level before the close | +0.3% |
|---|---|---|
| Open gap | it gapped 2.0% below the previous close 8 sessions ago and has not traded back through the level it left behind at 7.96 — an "unfilled gap", which describes a price range no trade has since crossed and is not a forecast that it will be crossed | -2.0% |
| Gap filled | a 3.7% gap up opened on 2026-08-06 has been "filled" 19 sessions ago — price traded back through the level the gap left behind, and it took 34 sessions to close | 19 sessions ago |
Price streaks
1
| Closing streak | it closed lower in its latest session, after a session that did not close lower — a single down day rather than a run | 1 session down |
|---|
Relative strength
4
| vs market, 1 month | over the past 1 month this stock lagged the market by 18.5 percentage points (the stock lost 18.5% while the market lost 0.1%) | -18.5% |
|---|---|---|
| vs market, 3 months | over the past 3 months this stock lagged the market by 25.8 percentage points (the stock lost 22.5% while the market gained 3.3%) | -25.8% |
| vs market, 6 months | over the past 6 months this stock lagged the market by 35.1 percentage points (the stock lost 25.3% while the market gained 9.8%) | -35.1% |
| vs market, 12 months | over the past 12 months this stock lagged the market by 21.7 percentage points (the stock lost 6.6% while the market gained 15.2%) | -21.7% |
Signal agreement
2
| Bullish technical signals | 2 of the 9 technical signals we can compute for it are currently in a bullish state: its RSI momentum gauge is oversold (a beaten-down reading), near the bottom of its 14-day range (oversold) — these describe past price behaviour, not a forecast | 2 of 9 |
|---|---|---|
| Bearish technical signals | 7 of the 9 technical signals we can compute for it are currently in a bearish state: a "death cross" — its 50-day average is below its 200-day, trading below its 200-day average, a fresh 20-day low, MACD momentum is negative, a strong downtrend, with sellers in control, lagging the market over 6 months, trading below the Ichimoku cloud — these describe past price behaviour, not a forecast | 7 of 9 |
Trend (Ichimoku cloud)
1
| Vs the Ichimoku cloud | trading 21% below the Ichimoku cloud — a band drawn from where its own highs and lows sat up to 2026-09-15 and projected forward over today's price, the side traders read as an established downtrend, with the band above acting as the level that would have to be cleared. The band itself is thin, spanning 1.2% of the share price, which is taken to mean a barrier that gives way easily. | -20.7% |
|---|
Volume-weighted price
2
| Vs this year’s average price paid | the price is 21% below the average price paid so far this year, so the typical buyer over that stretch is under water. That average is $9.02 — a volume-weighted average of daily closes over 200 sessions, not a true tick-by-tick VWAP. | -21.0% |
|---|---|---|
| Vs the average paid since it last reported | the price is 17% below the average price paid since it last reported on 2026-08-05 (its 10-Q), so the typical buyer over that stretch is under water. That average is $8.54 — a volume-weighted average of daily closes over 55 sessions, not a true tick-by-tick VWAP. | -16.6% |
Price levels it has turned at before
GNL last closed at $7.12 on 2026-10-21. Since 2024-10-21 it has turned at 2 prices below its last close and 11 above; the 2 nearest below and the 3 nearest above are listed, nearest first.
| Level | Side | Distance | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| $7.16 | Resistance | 0.5% above the last close | turned there three times · 2024-11-19 to 2025-06-17 |
| $6.97 | Support | 2.2% below the last close | turned there twice · 2025-01-29 to 2025-02-12 |
| $7.45 | Resistance | 4.6% above the last close | turned there 8 times · 2024-12-18 to 2025-11-03 |
| $6.76 | Support | 5.1% below the last close | turned there twice · 2025-01-13 to 2025-08-06 |
| $7.72 | Resistance | 8.5% above the last close | turned there 10 times · 2024-11-27 to 2025-11-21 |
A level is a price this company reversed or paused at more than once — they describe past behaviour, not a forecast of where the price will go.
Wave structure
Its recent swings can be read as a three-part upward correction — the A-B-C shape chartists use for a pullback — now complete.
This labelling fails — stops being a possible reading at all — if it closes above $9.32.
It is the only labelling that fits these swings, though its proportions are not the textbook ones. It was chosen from 3 labellings that survived the rules, counting shorter readings of the same bars.
This reading has stood for 31 trading days, since 2026-09-09.
Read from daily closes as of 2026-10-21.
An Elliott-wave count describes the swings already printed and the level that would disprove it. It is not a forecast, a target, or advice.
Screens: Trading below the 200-day moving average · Trading below the 50-day moving average · Oversold (14-day RSI below 30) · Near the 52-week low · Pulled back from the 12-month high · Broke down to a new 20-day low | Learn: moving average · golden cross · adx · rsi · breakout · fifty two week high low
Based on daily closing prices as of 2026-10-21. Describes past price behavior only — informational, not financial advice.
Analyst consensus
- Consensus ratingBuy (2.00 mean, 1=Strong Buy…5=Strong Sell) — 8 analysts
- Mean price target$10.00 range $8.00 – $12.00
Analyst estimates, as of 2026-10-16. These are third-party analyst opinions and price targets, aggregated — not a recommendation, prediction, or advice from stocks-llm. Informational only.
Analyst EPS estimate for GNL
- Consensus EPS estimate-$0.045 next reporting period, as of 2026-10-16
- Estimate change, 30 days+$0.005 from -$0.05, on 2026-09-11, 35-day window
- Readings revised upward11% of 9 comparable readings
The consensus estimate for the next reporting period, and how it has moved between readings of that SAME period. A change is measured only between readings estimating one period — when a company reports, the consensus moves to the next quarter and the two numbers are not comparable. Informational only, not a forecast and not advice.
Key risks (from latest filing)
["Exposure to foreign currency fluctuations due to significant European operations.","High level of indebtedness and potential inability to refinance debt on favorable terms.","Risks associated with managing and disposing of multi-tenant assets."]
What changed in the latest 10-Q
AI-assisted comparison of GNL's 10-Q filed 2026-08-05 against the prior one filed 2026-05-06.
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
- Added:
- Newer filing (2026-08-05) states as of June 30, 2026: owned 798 properties, 39.7 million rentable square feet, weighted-average remaining lease term of 5.7 years, portfolio comprised of 25% Office properties, 63.3% of rental income from Investment Grade rated tenants (38.0% actual and 25.3% implied), and uses 'proprietary Moody's analytical tool' language.
- Newer filing (2026-08-05) adds the phrase 'including the Modiv transaction' in the forward-looking statements risk discussion.
- Newer filing (2026-08-05) retitles the merger section heading to 'Agreement and Plan of Merger with Modiv' (older heading was 'Agreement and Plan of Merger').
- Newer filing (2026-08-05) refers to filing the Form S-4 'with the SEC' and describes the Securities Act as 'the Securities Act of 1933, as amended' in the final merger paragraph.
- Removed:
- Older filing (2026-05-06) states as of March 31, 2026: owned 809 properties, 40.3 million rentable square feet, weighted-average remaining lease term of 5.9 years, portfolio comprised of 26% Office properties, 64.4% of rental income from Investment Grade rated tenants (33.5% actual and 30.9% implied), and uses 'proprietary Moody's Analytics tool' language.
- Older filing (2026-05-06) omitted the phrase 'including the Modiv transaction' in the forward-looking statements risk discussion.
- Older filing (2026-05-06) titled the merger section 'Agreement and Plan of Merger' without the 'with Modiv' qualifier.
- Older filing (2026-05-06) did not specify 'with the SEC' and described the Securities Act without the ', as amended' qualifier in the final merger paragraph.
- Reworded:
- Portfolio statistics updated from March 31, 2026 figures to June 30, 2026 figures, including property count (809 to 798), rentable square feet (40.3M to 39.7M), remaining lease term (5.9 to 5.7 years), and Retail/Office composition percentages shifted slightly (27%/26% to 28%/25%).
- Investment Grade tenant percentages changed from 64.4% total (33.5% actual / 30.9% implied) as of March 31, 2026 to 63.3% total (38.0% actual / 25.3% implied) as of June 30, 2026.
- Tool description changed from 'proprietary Moody's Analytics tool' to 'proprietary Moody's analytical tool'.
- Forward-looking risks sentence changed from 'any potential future acquisition or disposition by the Company' to 'any potential future acquisition, including the Modiv transaction, or disposition by the Company'.
- Notes:
- The newer filing text appears truncated at the end of the final merger paragraph ('...prospectus of the Company for the issuance of the Mo'), so any additional changes after that point cannot be assessed.
Risk Factors
- Added:
- Newer filing (2026-08-05) states that as of the date of the report, Modiv has received multiple demand letters from, and is aware of two complaints filed on behalf of, purported Modiv stockholders in connection with the Mergers.
- Newer filing (2026-08-05) states that the letters and complaints allege certain disclosure deficiencies in the preliminary proxy statement/prospectus filed with the SEC on June 1, 2026 and demand that additional disclosures be made before Modiv stockholders vote on the Merger Proposal.
- Newer filing (2026-08-05) states that GNL and Modiv believe the allegations asserted in the demand letters and complaints are without merit.
- Newer filing (2026-08-05) states that GNL and Modiv may receive additional stockholder demand letters or complaints may be filed in courts related to the Mergers in the future.
- Newer filing (2026-08-05) states that defending against such claims may be expensive and divert management's attention and resources, which could adversely affect the respective businesses of GNL and Modiv.
- Newer filing (2026-08-05) states that an adverse outcome in such matters, as well as the costs and efforts of a defense even if successful, could have a material adverse effect on GNL's or Modiv's ability to consummate the Mergers or their respective business, results of operation or financial position, including through an injunction prohibiting the Mergers altogether or the diversion of either company's resources or distraction of key personnel.
- Removed:
- Older filing (2026-05-06) contained an introductory sentence directing the reader to carefully consider the risks described below and those in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025.
- Older filing (2026-05-06) contained a section titled 'Risks Related to the Proposed Mergers' with a detailed risk factor discussing the announcement and pendency of the Mergers, including a bulleted list of risks such as market reaction, fixed exchange ratio, effects on relationships with clients and suppliers, transaction costs, capital raising difficulties, employee retention, legal proceedings, integration risks, competitive pressures, business restrictions, inability to realize anticipated benefits, termination events, and business disruption.
- Older filing (2026-05-06) contained a risk factor discussing that the Mergers may not be completed on the terms or timeline currently contemplated, including a list of closing conditions (stockholder vote, absence of injunctions, accuracy of representations, performance of covenants, tax opinions, absence of material adverse effect) and a statement that the Merger Agreement may be terminated if the Mergers are not consummated by February 3, 2027.
- Older filing (2026-05-06) contained a statement that if the Merger Agreement is terminated under certain circumstances, GNL may be required to pay Modiv a $15.0 million termination fee.
- Older filing (2026-05-06) contained a risk factor stating that common stockholders will be diluted by the Mergers, including an expectation to issue 4,914,532 OpCo Merger Consideration OP Units which can be redeemed for common stock.
- Reworded:
- Newer filing (2026-08-05) replaced the detailed risk factor discussion from the older filing (2026-05-06) with a statement that, except as set forth in Part II Item 1A of the Form 10-Q filed May 6, 2026, there have been no material changes to the risk factors in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025.
- Newer filing (2026-08-05) reframed the litigation risk factor from the older filing (2026-05-06), which was titled 'Potential litigation instituted against us, Modiv or our respective directors challenging the proposed Merger may prevent the Mergers from becoming effective within the expected timeframe or at all,' into a differently structured risk factor beginning with 'An adverse outcome in any litigation or other legal proceedings instituted against us, Modiv or our respective directors relating to the proposed Mergers could have a material adverse impact...'
- Notes:
- The older filing (2026-05-06) Risk Factors text appears truncated mid-sentence, so removals and wording changes for the litigation-related risk factor are assessed only against the visible portion of the older text.
AI-assisted comparison of two SEC filing sections. It describes wording and theme changes only, makes no materiality, legal, or investment judgement, and is not financial advice. Informational only — not financial advice.
Insider activity (SEC Form 4)
No open-market insider purchases or sales are on record for GNL — recent Form 4 activity was compensation-related (awards, option exercises, or tax withholding), not open-market buying or selling.
View full insider trading history → View SEC Form 3/4/5 filingsOnly open-market purchases (SEC code P) and sales (code S) are counted here. Option exercises, vesting/awards, gifts, and shares withheld for taxes are excluded — they are compensation or mechanical, not open-market conviction. Sales may be planned and non-discretionary (e.g. a Rule 10b5-1 plan) and are not necessarily bearish; open-market buying is not a recommendation to buy. Informational only — not financial advice.
Short interest (FINRA)
GNL had 11,398,630 shares of reported short interest as of the 2026-09-30 FINRA settlement date (delayed, bi-monthly; not real-time).
GNL had 5.40% of its shares outstanding sold short as of the 2026-09-30 FINRA settlement date (percent of FLOAT would be higher — float is not disclosed in the source). FINRA reported 3.6 days to cover at the same settlement.
- Reported short interest (shares) 11,398,630
- Short interest (% of shares outstanding) 5.40%
- Prior settlement (shares) 12,777,146
- Reported change -10.79%
- Days to cover (reported) 3.6
Reported to FINRA as of the 2026-09-30 settlement date. Short interest is reported to FINRA and published on a delayed, bi-monthly schedule (as of a settlement date, disseminated roughly eight business days later) — it is NOT real-time, does not cover every venue or all US trading, and is not a short-squeeze prediction or investment advice. Days-to-cover is the value FINRA reports; percent of float is not shown because the source file carries no share-count denominator — where a percent appears it is of shares OUTSTANDING, the larger base, and is therefore a floor on percent of float. Informational only — not financial advice.
Competitors & peers
- W. P. Carey (WPC)
- Realty Income (O)
- Agree Realty (ADC)
- Essential Properties Realty Trust (EPRT)
- VICI Properties (VICI)
AI-enriched competitor set. Linked names are companies covered by stocks-llm; other named peers are shown for reference only.
Compare GNL vs…
GLOBAL NET LEASE INC is found in…
Frequently asked questions
What does GLOBAL NET LEASE INC (GNL) do?
Global Net Lease, Inc. is a publicly traded real estate investment trust (REIT) focused on acquiring and managing a global portfolio of commercial real estate. The company primarily invests in single-tenant, mission-critical net-leased properties, including industrial, office, and retail assets, with operations diversified across the United States and Europe.
What sector is GLOBAL NET LEASE INC (GNL) in?
GLOBAL NET LEASE INC (GNL) is classified in the Real Estate sector. Its industry is Diversified REITs. It trades on NYSE.
Does GNL pay a dividend?
Yes — GLOBAL NET LEASE INC (GNL) pays a dividend, with an indicated yield of about 8.67% and 1-year non-decreasing per-share dividend streak (SEC EDGAR XBRL) (market data, as of 2026-09-03). Informational only — not financial advice.
Who are GLOBAL NET LEASE INC's (GNL) competitors?
Notable peers of GLOBAL NET LEASE INC (GNL) include W. P. Carey, Realty Income, Agree Realty, Essential Properties Realty Trust and VICI Properties. This peer set is informational only — not financial advice.
Is GLOBAL NET LEASE INC (GNL) overbought or oversold right now?
GLOBAL NET LEASE INC (GNL) is currently in oversold territory (its 14-day RSI is 11, below 30) (as of 2026-10-21). RSI describes recent price momentum, not a forecast — informational only, not financial advice.
Where does stocks-llm's data on GNL come from?
Fundamentals come from SEC XBRL company filings for the figures marked with a fiscal year, and market data, as of 2026-09-03 for the rest; prices are market data, as of 2026-09-03; company filings and profile facts come from SEC EDGAR. All figures are delayed daily-close data shown with their as-of date — informational only, not financial advice.
Fundamentals: SEC XBRL company filings for the figures marked with a fiscal year, and market data, as of 2026-09-03 for the rest. Filings: SEC EDGAR. Prices are delayed daily-close data.
Last updated 2026-10-21.
Informational only — NOT financial advice. All figures are delayed daily-close data from SEC EDGAR & market data, shown with their as-of date.