GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER (GT)
Consumer Discretionary · Global tire manufacturing and automotive services · NASDAQ
Goodyear is a century-old global tire manufacturer struggling through a major transformation, divesting non-core businesses and consolidating operations while facing margin compression and declining unit volumes.
What GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER does
Goodyear is one of the world's leading manufacturers of tires for automobiles, trucks, buses, aircraft, motorcycles, and farm implements, serving both original equipment and replacement markets. The company designs, manufactures, and distributes tires under brands including Goodyear, Cooper, Kelly, Mastercraft, Fulda, Sava, and others across 49 manufacturing facilities in 19 countries. Beyond tires, Goodyear operates approximately 750 retail outlets providing repair services and maintains one of the world's largest networks of commercial truck service and tire retreading centers.
Themes: Replacement tires, Original equipment tires (OE), Commercial truck tire services, Tire retreading, Global tire manufacturing, Automotive retail and service
Fundamentals
- Price$6.00 as of 2026-08-24 close
- Market cap$1.7B as of 2026-08-24
- 1-year return-30.6% 2025-08-22 close $8.65 → 2026-08-24 close $6.00
- P/En/a negative earnings
- Net margin-11.6% as of 2026-08-24
- Gross margin+18.6% as of 2026-08-24
- ROE-58.1% as of 2026-08-24
- Debt / equity2.33 as of 2026-08-24
- Revenue growth (YoY)-3.7% as of 2026-08-24
- Revenue CAGR (3y)-4.2% SEC XBRL
- Beta0.98 as of 2026-08-24
- Last reported earnings2026-08-05 SEC EDGAR Form 8-K (Item 2.02)
How GT compares in its sector
- net profit marginbottom 10% 334 covered Consumer Discretionary peers, as of 2026-08-24
- operating marginbottom 25% 334 covered Consumer Discretionary peers, as of 2026-08-24
- gross marginbottom 25% 331 covered Consumer Discretionary peers, as of 2026-08-24
- return on equitybottom 10% 334 covered Consumer Discretionary peers, as of 2026-08-24
- 3-year revenue CAGRbottom 25% 325 covered Consumer Discretionary peers
- free cash flow (absolute dollars, latest fiscal year)bottom 10% 311 covered Consumer Discretionary peers, as of FY2025
Position among covered Consumer Discretionary companies that report each metric (minimum 5 peers). A relative position within our covered catalog — not a valuation, quality, or investment judgment. A higher percentile is simply a higher value (for P/E, more expensive on earnings — never "better"). Informational only.
How GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER looks technically
GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER (GT) is trading 20.3% below its 200-day average, the long-term trend line — a long-term downtrend. Its 50-day average crossed below its 200-day average about 112 trading days ago — a "death cross", a bearish long-term signal. A trend is forming but not yet strong — ADX, a 0–100 trend-strength gauge, is 25 (a reading of 25+ marks a strong trend). Momentum is neutral — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 38, neither overbought (above 70) nor oversold (below 30). It made a new 20-day low about 2 trading days ago. It is 43.8% below its highest point of the past year.
Trend
8
| Distance from the 200-day | it is trading 20.3% below its 200-day average, the long-term trend line — a long-term downtrend | -20.3% |
|---|---|---|
| 50-day moving average | its average price over the last 50 trading days — a short-term trend line — is $6.59 | $6.59 |
| 200-day moving average | its average price over the last 200 trading days — the long-term trend line — is $7.49 | $7.49 |
| Swing structure | each recent peak has been higher than the one before it and each dip has been shallower — the pattern chart-watchers call an uptrend, which describes where price has already been and not where it goes next | higher highs and higher lows |
| Last swing turn | its last significant turn was a swing high 30 calendar days ago — the swings before that are what the structure reading is measured on | 30 sessions |
| Wave structure | its recent swings can be read as a completed three-part upward correction — a pullback in the A-B-C shape Elliott-wave chartists use; the labelling fails if price closes above 7.555. It is the only labelling that fits, and it describes the swings already printed, not what comes next. | possible three-wave upward correction, complete |
| Since the 50/200 cross | its 50-day average crossed below its 200-day average about 112 trading days ago — a "death cross", a bearish long-term signal | 112 sessions |
| Trend strength (14-day ADX) | a trend is forming but not yet strong — ADX, a 0–100 trend-strength gauge, is 25 (a reading of 25+ marks a strong trend) | 24.6 |
Momentum
3
| 14-day RSI | momentum is neutral — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 38, neither overbought (above 70) nor oversold (below 30) | 38.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Position in its 14-day range | it is trading near the bottom of its 14-day range ($5.77 to $7.26) — its "stochastic" reading is 13 out of 100, where 0 would mean closing exactly at the 14-session low and 100 exactly at the high. This measures WHERE the price sits inside its recent range, which is a different question from the RSI beside it: RSI is a momentum gauge, measuring how FAST the price has been moving, so a stock can drift quietly to the bottom of its range with an ordinary RSI, or fall sharply and still sit in the middle. It has been climbing within that range over the last few sessions. | 13.4 |
| Since the MACD crossed zero | MACD, a trend-momentum gauge, is in negative territory (momentum leaning bearish) | 17 sessions |
Range
12
| 52-week high | its highest closing price over the past year (about 252 trading days) was $10.62 | $10.62 |
|---|---|---|
| From the 52-week high | it is 43.8% below its 52-week high (its highest price of the past year) | -43.8% |
| Above the 52-week low | it is 9.9% above its 52-week low (its lowest price of the past year) | +9.9% |
| Below the 52-week high | it is 43.8% below its highest point of the past year | 43.8% |
| Since a 20-day breakout | it made a new 20-day low about 2 trading days ago | 2 sessions |
| Since a 55-day breakout | it made a new 55-day high about 23 trading days ago | 23 sessions |
| All-time high | its highest closing price on record is $37.20 (set on 2017-03-16) | $37.20 |
| Given back of the 52-week move | over the past year its closes ranged ($5.58 to $10.54), and it has recovered only a small part of its fall from last year’s high — 8% of it. Chart-watchers call 61.8%-65% given back the "golden pocket" — for this company that is $8.65 to $8.80. It is watched widely enough that orders cluster there, which is the honest reason it matters; it is not a forecast. | 7.9% |
| From the all-time high | it is 84.0% below its all-time high | -84.0% |
| Nearest price level | it is trading 9.5% below a resistance level at $6.54 — a price it turned at twice since 2025-10-14, most recently on 2026-04-16. Since 2024-08-21 it has 0 such levels below the current price and 12 above. Levels like these describe where the price has reversed or paused before; they are not a forecast of where it will go. | +9.5% |
| All-time low | its lowest closing price on record is $3.17 (set on 2009-03-06) | $3.17 |
| Above the all-time low | it is 88.3% above its all-time low | +88.3% |
Volatility
5
| Band width vs its own 6 months | day-to-day price swings are wider than usual versus its own recent 6-month history (wider than about 75% of it) | 75th percentile |
|---|---|---|
| Typical daily range | in a typical session it travels about $0.2863 between its high and its low — about 4.8% of its price. That is its "average true range" over the last 14 sessions, which also counts the distance from the previous close, so a day that opens well away from yesterday counts as the large move it was | $0.2863 |
| Bollinger bands (20-day, ±2σ) | most of its recent trading has stayed between about $5.46 and $7.58 — the "Bollinger bands", a range drawn two standard deviations either side of its 20-day average price, which widens when the stock gets more volatile and narrows when it settles | $5.46 – $6.52 – $7.58 |
| Typical daily range (% of price) | its price moves about 4.8% in a typical session — about typical for the companies we cover. This is the average gap between a session's high and low over the last 14 sessions, counting overnight moves, expressed against the current price so it can be compared with companies trading at any price | 4.8% |
| Stretch from the 200-day average | it is trading 5.3 daily ranges below its 200-day average price (20.3% below it in plain percentage terms) — a way of asking how far it has stretched from its own average in units of how far it normally moves in a day, so a calm company and a jumpy one can be compared on the same scale | 5.3 daily ranges below its 200-day average |
Volume
1
| Volume vs its 30-day average | trading volume is about normal versus its 30-day average | 0.66× |
|---|
Analyst
2
| Change in the average price target | analysts' average price target is unchanged from the prior reading | 0.0% |
|---|---|---|
| Change in the consensus rating | the analyst consensus rating is unchanged since the prior reading | unchanged |
Candlestick patterns
2
| Since a bullish engulfing | 6 sessions ago it opened below the previous session's close and finished above that session's open — a "bullish engulfing" pair, where one up day more than undid the down day before it | 6 sessions ago |
|---|---|---|
| Since a bearish engulfing | 7 sessions ago it opened above the previous session's close and finished below that session's open — a "bearish engulfing" pair, where one down day more than undid the up day before it | 7 sessions ago |
Price gaps
2
| Gap at the open | it opened on 2026-08-21 0.5% above the previous session's close — an overnight gap, the part of the move that happened while the market was shut, and had not traded back through that level by the close | +0.5% |
|---|---|---|
| Gap filled | a 2.0% gap up opened on 2026-08-19 has been "filled" 2 sessions ago — price traded back through the level the gap left behind, and it closed again during the very session that opened it | 2 sessions ago |
Price streaks
1
| Closing streak | it closed higher in its latest session, after a session that did not close higher — a single up day rather than a run | 1 session up |
|---|
Relative strength
4
| vs market, 1 month | over the past 1 month this stock lagged the market by 20.4 percentage points (the stock lost 18.1% while the market gained 2.3%) | -20.4% |
|---|---|---|
| vs market, 3 months | over the past 3 months this stock lagged the market by 1.4 percentage points (the stock gained 1.7% while the market gained 3.1%) | -1.4% |
| vs market, 6 months | over the past 6 months this stock lagged the market by 44.3 percentage points (the stock lost 33.2% while the market gained 11.1%) | -44.3% |
| vs market, 12 months | over the past 12 months this stock lagged the market by 48.1 percentage points (the stock lost 27.6% while the market gained 20.5%) | -48.1% |
Signal agreement
2
| Bullish technical signals | 1 of the 9 technical signals we can compute for it is currently in a bullish state: near the bottom of its 14-day range (oversold) — these describe past price behaviour, not a forecast | 1 of 9 |
|---|---|---|
| Bearish technical signals | 6 of the 9 technical signals we can compute for it are currently in a bearish state: a "death cross" — its 50-day average is below its 200-day, trading below its 200-day average, a fresh 20-day low, MACD momentum is negative, lagging the market over 6 months, trading below the Ichimoku cloud — these describe past price behaviour, not a forecast | 6 of 9 |
Trend (Ichimoku cloud)
1
| Vs the Ichimoku cloud | trading 7.5% below the Ichimoku cloud — a band drawn from where its own highs and lows sat up to 2026-07-16 and projected forward over today's price, the side traders read as an established downtrend, with the band above acting as the level that would have to be cleared. The band itself is moderate, spanning 3.3% of the share price. | -7.5% |
|---|
Volume-weighted price
2
| Vs this year’s average price paid | the price is 16% below the average price paid so far this year, so the typical buyer over that stretch is under water. That average is $7.13 — a volume-weighted average of daily closes over 157 sessions, not a true tick-by-tick VWAP. | -16.3% |
|---|---|---|
| Vs the average paid since it last reported | the price is 4% below the average price paid since it last reported on 2026-08-05 (its 8-K), so the typical buyer over that stretch is under water. That average is $6.23 — a volume-weighted average of daily closes over 13 sessions, not a true tick-by-tick VWAP. | -4.2% |
Price levels it has turned at before
GT last closed at $5.97 on 2026-08-21. Since 2024-08-21 it has turned at 0 prices below its last close and 12 above; the 3 nearest above are listed, nearest first.
| Level | Side | Distance | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| $6.54 | Resistance | 9.5% above the last close | turned there twice · 2025-10-14 to 2026-04-16 |
| $6.74 | Resistance | 12.8% above the last close | turned there twice · 2025-10-31 to 2026-06-16 |
| $7.26 | Resistance | 21.6% above the last close | turned there three times · 2024-09-11 to 2026-07-06 |
A level is a price this company reversed or paused at more than once — they describe past behaviour, not a forecast of where the price will go.
Wave structure
Its recent swings can be read as a three-part upward correction — the A-B-C shape chartists use for a pullback — now complete.
This labelling fails — stops being a possible reading at all — if it closes above $7.55.
It is the only labelling that fits these swings, though its proportions are not the textbook ones.
This labelling was already in place when we began recording count changes on 2026-08-13, so how long it has stood is not something we can say yet.
Read from daily closes as of 2026-08-21.
An Elliott-wave count describes the swings already printed and the level that would disprove it. It is not a forecast, a target, or advice.
Screens: Trading below the 200-day moving average · Pulled back from the 12-month high · Broke down to a new 20-day low · lagging the market · At the bottom of its 14-day range (stochastic below 20) · Under water since its last earnings report (below the anchored VWAP) | Learn: moving average · golden cross · adx · rsi · breakout · fifty two week high low
Based on daily closing prices as of 2026-08-21. Describes past price behavior only — informational, not financial advice.
Analyst consensus
- Consensus ratingHold (2.70 mean, 1=Strong Buy…5=Strong Sell) — 7 analysts
- Mean price target$7.46 range $6.00 – $10.00; median $7.00
Analyst estimates, as of 2026-08-21. These are third-party analyst opinions and price targets, aggregated — not a recommendation, prediction, or advice from stocks-llm. Informational only.
Analyst EPS estimate for GT
- Consensus EPS estimate$0.04112 next reporting period, as of 2026-08-21
Change over time is not available yet: it needs two readings of the same reporting period at least 30 days apart, and we have been recording these estimates since 2026-08-04. An estimate for a DIFFERENT quarter is not a revision, so a reading from before the last report is never compared with one after it.
The consensus estimate for the next reporting period, and how it has moved between readings of that SAME period. A change is measured only between readings estimating one period — when a company reports, the consensus moves to the next quarter and the two numbers are not comparable. Informational only, not a forecast and not advice.
Key risks (from latest filing)
["Significant net losses and negative profitability: Goodyear reported a net loss of $1,721 million in 2025 with a -11.64% net margin, reflecting operational challenges and restructuring costs from the ongoing Goodyear Forward transformation plan.","Declining revenue and volume: Net sales declined 3.69% year-over-year, with tire unit sales falling from 166.6 million units in 2024 to 158.7 million units in 2025 across all segments, indicating reduced demand and market pressure.","High leverage and debt burden: Long-term debt and finance leases total $5,276 million, with short-term obligations of $1,226 million due within one year, limiting financial flexibility despite divestiture proceeds intended to reduce leverage."]
What changed in the latest 10-Q
AI-assisted comparison of GT's 10-Q filed 2026-05-07 against the prior one filed 2025-11-04.
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
- Added:
- Newer filing (2026-05-07) states manufacturing facilities decreased from 51 to 49 in 19 countries
- Newer filing specifies Q1 2026 tire unit shipments decreased 11.6% compared to 2025
- Newer filing reports Q1 2026 net sales of $3,881 million vs Q1 2025 $4,253 million
- Newer filing reports Q1 2026 net loss of $249 million ($0.86 per share) vs Q1 2025 net income of $115 million ($0.40 per share)
- Newer filing reports total segment operating income $95 million in Q1 2026 vs $195 million in Q1 2025
- Newer filing quantifies specific cost impacts: conversion costs $155 million, lower tire volume $87 million, tariff costs $58 million offset by $46 million refund, divestitures $30 million (Chemical) and $13 million (Dunlop), SAG expenses $17 million, other tire-related costs $9 million
- Newer filing quantifies offsets: Goodyear Forward benefits $107 million, lower raw material costs $88 million, favorable price and product mix $15 million
- Newer filing reports March 31, 2026 cash of $723 million and $2,975 million unused credit availability
- Newer filing reports Q1 2026 operating cash outflow of $718 million including $650 million working capital and $83 million rationalization payments
- Newer filing reports Q1 2026 investing cash outflow of $174 million primarily for $175 million capital expenditures
- Newer filing reports Q1 2026 financing cash inflow of $820 million primarily from $807 million net borrowings
- Newer filing states approximately $90 million unabsorbed overhead expected in Q2 2026
- Newer filing expects Goodyear Forward to deliver approximately $325 million incremental savings in 2026
- Newer filing expects raw material costs benefit of approximately $100 million in Q2 2026 vs Q2 2025
- Newer filing expects raw material costs headwind of approximately $200 million in second half 2026 vs second half 2025
- Newer filing states inflation, tariffs and other costs will increase approximately $420 million in 2026 net of IEEPA tariff refunds
- Newer filing references approximately $50 million inflationary cost pressures in Q1 2026
- Newer filing references planned rationalization of lower-tier product offerings as driver of shipment decrease
- Removed:
- Older filing (2025-11-04) discussed Goodyear Forward plan announced November 15, 2023 in detail including $1.3 billion cost structure reduction target and $200 million annual run-rate benefit by end of 2025; newer filing does not repeat this historical detail
- Older filing provided detailed narrative on February 3, 2025 OTR tire business sale to Yokohama for $905 million including ancillary agreements; newer filing references this only as historical context for divestitures impact
- Older filing provided detailed narrative on May 7, 2025 Dunlop brand sale to SRI for $526 million plus $105 million transition support fee plus $104 million inventory; newer filing references only as divestitures impact
- Older filing provided detailed narrative on October 31, 2025 Chemical Business sale for $650 million to G-3 Chickadee; newer filing references only as divestitures impact
- Older filing reported $580 million in Goodyear Forward benefits during nine months ended September 30, 2025; newer filing provides forward guidance instead
- Older filing reported 5.9% decrease in tire unit sales for Q3 2025; newer filing reports different period (Q1 2026) and different metric (11.6% shipment decrease)
- Reworded:
- Metric shift from 'tire unit sales' (older, Q3 2025) to 'tire unit shipments' (newer, Q1 2026)
- Older filing focused on historical transformation plan accomplishments and completed divestitures; newer filing focuses on current period results and forward-looking cost and margin outlook
- Older filing emphasized portfolio optimization completion narrative; newer filing emphasizes current quarter operational challenges (weakness, competitiveness, cost pressures)
- Notes:
- The two filings cover different fiscal periods (Q1 2026 vs nine months ended September 30, 2025 and Q3 2025) making some comparisons contextually different rather than changes in the same period
- Older filing text appears truncated at end ('In the third quarte') so full context may not be captured for all comparisons
- Cash and liquidity figures are point-in-time measurements (March 31, 2026 vs December 31, 2025) rather than changes in disclosed policies or positions
Risk Factors
The two filings could not be meaningfully compared for this section.
AI-assisted comparison of two SEC filing sections. It describes wording and theme changes only, makes no materiality, legal, or investment judgement, and is not financial advice. Informational only — not financial advice.
Insider activity (SEC Form 4)
No open-market insider purchases or sales are on record for GT — recent Form 4 activity was compensation-related (awards, option exercises, or tax withholding), not open-market buying or selling.
View full insider trading history → View SEC Form 3/4/5 filingsOnly open-market purchases (SEC code P) and sales (code S) are counted here. Option exercises, vesting/awards, gifts, and shares withheld for taxes are excluded — they are compensation or mechanical, not open-market conviction. Sales may be planned and non-discretionary (e.g. a Rule 10b5-1 plan) and are not necessarily bearish; open-market buying is not a recommendation to buy. Informational only — not financial advice.
Institutional ownership (13F)
5 institutional 13F filers reported holding GT as of 2026-03-31 (quarter-end position, filed within 45 days).
- Distinct 13F filers 5
- Reported shares held 46,793,215
- Reported value $310,239,024
reported quarterly holdings change (2025-12-31 → 2026-03-31): 1 new, 3 increased, 1 decreased, 0 exited. Change counts cover only managers that filed 13F reports in BOTH quarters, derived between two quarter-end snapshots — not same-day trades; a single manager is never said to have "bought" or "sold".
Institutional holdings are quarter-end long positions reported on SEC Form 13F-HR, filed up to 45 days after the quarter ends — they are delayed, are not real-time trades, exclude short positions and most non-US securities, and are not investment advice. Any increase/decrease is a reported change between two quarterly snapshots, not a same-day purchase or sale. These are quarter-end snapshots from the 13F filings on SEC EDGAR, filed within 45 days — not real-time, and any change is a difference between two quarterly reports, not a same-day trade. Informational only — not financial advice.
Short interest (FINRA)
GT had 34,617,682 shares of reported short interest as of the 2026-07-31 FINRA settlement date (delayed, bi-monthly; not real-time).
GT had 12.0% of its shares outstanding sold short as of the 2026-07-31 FINRA settlement date (percent of FLOAT would be higher — float is not disclosed in the source). FINRA reported 4.09 days to cover at the same settlement.
- Reported short interest (shares) 34,617,682
- Short interest (% of shares outstanding) 12.0%
- Prior settlement (shares) 38,835,984
- Reported change -10.86%
- Days to cover (reported) 4.09
Reported to FINRA as of the 2026-07-31 settlement date. Short interest is reported to FINRA and published on a delayed, bi-monthly schedule (as of a settlement date, disseminated roughly eight business days later) — it is NOT real-time, does not cover every venue or all US trading, and is not a short-squeeze prediction or investment advice. Days-to-cover is the value FINRA reports; percent of float is not shown because the source file carries no share-count denominator — where a percent appears it is of shares OUTSTANDING, the larger base, and is therefore a floor on percent of float. Informational only — not financial advice.
Competitors & peers
- Bridgestone (BRDCY)
- Michelin (MGDDF)
- Continental (CTTAY)
- Pirelli (PRLLY)
- Yokohama Rubber
- Sumitomo Rubber
- Cooper Tire (CTB)
AI-enriched competitor set. Linked names are companies covered by stocks-llm; other named peers are shown for reference only.
Frequently asked questions
What does GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER (GT) do?
Goodyear is one of the world's leading manufacturers of tires for automobiles, trucks, buses, aircraft, motorcycles, and farm implements, serving both original equipment and replacement markets. The company designs, manufactures, and distributes tires under brands including Goodyear, Cooper, Kelly, Mastercraft, Fulda, Sava, and others across 49 manufacturing facilities in 19 countries.
What sector is GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER (GT) in?
GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER (GT) is classified in the Consumer Discretionary sector. Its industry is Global tire manufacturing and automotive services. It trades on NASDAQ.
Who are GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER's (GT) competitors?
Notable peers of GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER (GT) include Bridgestone, Michelin, Continental, Pirelli and Yokohama Rubber. This peer set is informational only — not financial advice.
Is GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER (GT) overbought or oversold right now?
GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER (GT) is currently neither overbought nor oversold — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 38, in the neutral middle (as of 2026-08-21). RSI describes recent price momentum, not a forecast — informational only, not financial advice.
Where does stocks-llm's data on GT come from?
Fundamentals and prices come from market data, as of 2026-08-24; company filings and profile facts come from SEC EDGAR. All figures are delayed daily-close data shown with their as-of date — informational only, not financial advice.
Fundamentals: market data, as of 2026-08-24. Filings: SEC EDGAR. Prices are delayed daily-close data.
Last updated 2026-08-24.
Informational only — NOT financial advice. All figures are delayed daily-close data from SEC EDGAR & market data, shown with their as-of date.