Illinois Tool Works (ITW)
Industrials · Diversified Industrial Manufacturing · NYSE
ITW is a highly diversified global industrial manufacturer focused on proprietary, value-added engineering and specialized equipment across a broad range of sectors.
What Illinois Tool Works does
Illinois Tool Works Inc. is a diversified manufacturer that operates through a decentralized business model, providing engineered components, consumables, and related equipment across various industrial segments. The company's diverse product portfolio serves global markets, including automotive, construction, food equipment, polymers, fluids, and welding sectors. Its business is built on a foundation of proprietary technologies and deep customer relationships that emphasize specialized, value-added industrial solutions.
Themes: industrial automation, specialized manufacturing, automotive supply chain, commercial food service equipment, global industrial infrastructure
Fundamentals
- Price$264.71 as of 2026-10-08 close
- Market cap$75.4B as of 2026-06-30 (share count; price 2026-10-08)
- 1-year return+4.7% 2025-10-08 close $252.75 → 2026-10-08 close $264.71
- P/E23.99 as of 2026-10-08
- Net margin+19.1% FY2025, SEC XBRL
- ROE+95.0% FY2025, SEC XBRL
- Debt / equity3.35 as of 2026-09-02
- Revenue growth (YoY)+4.3% as of 2026-09-02
- Revenue CAGR (3y)+0.2% SEC XBRL
- Beta0.69 as of 2026-09-02
- Last reported earnings2026-07-28 SEC EDGAR Form 8-K (Item 2.02)
Dividend: yield +2.4%; at least 18 years of non-decreasing per-share dividends (SEC XBRL) — we do not hold the year before it, so the real streak may be longer.
How ITW compares in its sector
- price-to-earnings ratiomiddle range 349 covered Industrials peers, as of 2026-10-08
- net profit margintop 10% 417 covered Industrials peers, as of 2026-09-02
- operating margintop 10% 392 covered Industrials peers, as of 2026-09-02
- return on equitytop 10% 432 covered Industrials peers, as of 2026-09-02
- 3-year revenue CAGRmiddle range 428 covered Industrials peers
- indicated dividend yieldtop 25% 271 covered Industrials peers, as of 2026-09-02
- free cash flow (absolute dollars, latest fiscal year)top 10% 417 covered Industrials peers, as of FY2025
Position among covered Industrials companies that report each metric (minimum 5 peers). A relative position within our covered catalog — not a valuation, quality, or investment judgment. A higher percentile is simply a higher value (for P/E, more expensive on earnings — never "better"). Informational only.
Top 10 scores & list membership
ITW is not currently in any published Top 10 list. Its scores are below.
Top 10 score
53.7 #537 of 1,379 scored · #83 of 238 in Industrials
Profitability 92nd (return on equity 95%, operating margin 26.3%) and capital return 83rd (consecutive years of dividend increases 18 years, net share count bought back over the year 1.9); weakest is growth (25th, 3-year revenue CAGR 0.2%, revenue growth year over year 4.3%).
Scores as of 8 Oct 2026. Each bar is a percentile: how this company ranked against every company the score ranked, 0–100. A list is a published formula and its output, not a recommendation. Method version 4.
Dividend coverage (FY2025)
Covered by reported results. In FY2025, ITW's dividend was covered by reported results (earnings payout 58%, free-cash-flow payout 66%). This describes past coverage, not a forecast.
- Earnings payout58% dividends / net income
- Free-cash-flow payout66% dividends / (operating cash flow − capex)
Coverage derived from reported SEC EDGAR XBRL figures for FY2025 (dividends paid vs. net income and free cash flow, same fiscal year). This describes PAST coverage for one fiscal year — it does not predict whether a dividend will be maintained, raised, or cut, and a one-year payout ratio can be distorted by non-recurring items. Informational only — not financial advice.
How Illinois Tool Works looks technically
Illinois Tool Works (ITW) is trading 1.6% below its 200-day average, the long-term trend line — a long-term downtrend. Its 50-day average crossed above its 200-day average about 54 trading days ago — a "golden cross", a bullish long-term signal. A trend is forming but not yet strong — ADX, a 0–100 trend-strength gauge, is 23 (a reading of 25+ marks a strong trend). Momentum is neutral — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 45, neither overbought (above 70) nor oversold (below 30). MACD, a trend-momentum gauge, turned bearish about 7 trading days ago (its momentum flipped negative). It made a new 20-day low about 7 trading days ago.
Trend
8
| Distance from the 200-day | it is trading 1.6% below its 200-day average, the long-term trend line — a long-term downtrend | -1.6% |
|---|---|---|
| 50-day moving average | its average price over the last 50 trading days — a short-term trend line — is $276.80 | $276.80 |
| 200-day moving average | its average price over the last 200 trading days — the long-term trend line — is $268.88 | $268.88 |
| Swing structure | each recent peak has been lower than the one before it and each dip deeper — the pattern chart-watchers call a downtrend, which describes where price has already been and not where it goes next | lower highs and lower lows |
| Last swing turn | its last significant turn was a swing low 7 calendar days ago — the swings before that are what the structure reading is measured on | 7 sessions |
| Wave structure | its recent swings can be read as a completed three-part downward correction — a pullback in the A-B-C shape Elliott-wave chartists use; the labelling fails if price closes below 255.69. It is the only labelling that fits, though not with textbook proportions, and it describes the swings already printed, not what comes next. | possible three-wave downward correction, complete (atypical proportions) |
| Since the 50/200 cross | its 50-day average crossed above its 200-day average about 54 trading days ago — a "golden cross", a bullish long-term signal | 54 sessions |
| Trend strength (14-day ADX) | a trend is forming but not yet strong — ADX, a 0–100 trend-strength gauge, is 23 (a reading of 25+ marks a strong trend) | 23.3 |
Momentum
3
| 14-day RSI | momentum is neutral — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 45, neither overbought (above 70) nor oversold (below 30) | 44.8 |
|---|---|---|
| Position in its 14-day range | it is trading in the lower half of its 14-day range ($255.69 to $276.39) — its "stochastic" reading is 44 out of 100, where 0 would mean closing exactly at the 14-session low and 100 exactly at the high. This measures WHERE the price sits inside its recent range, which is a different question from the RSI beside it: RSI is a momentum gauge, measuring how FAST the price has been moving, so a stock can drift quietly to the bottom of its range with an ordinary RSI, or fall sharply and still sit in the middle. It has been climbing within that range over the last few sessions. | 43.6 |
| Since the MACD crossed zero | MACD, a trend-momentum gauge, turned bearish about 7 trading days ago (its momentum flipped negative) | 7 sessions |
Range
12
| 52-week high | its highest closing price over the past year (about 252 trading days) was $303.15 | $303.15 |
|---|---|---|
| From the 52-week high | it is 12.7% below its 52-week high (its highest price of the past year) | -12.7% |
| Above the 52-week low | it is 10.8% above its 52-week low (its lowest price of the past year) | +10.8% |
| Below the 52-week high | it is 12.7% below its highest point of the past year | 12.7% |
| Since a 20-day breakout | it made a new 20-day low about 7 trading days ago | 7 sessions |
| Since a 55-day breakout | it made a new 55-day low about 7 trading days ago | 7 sessions |
| All-time high | its highest closing price on record is $303.15 (set on 2026-02-12) | $303.15 |
| Given back of the 52-week move | over the past year its closes ranged ($241.07 to $299.60), and it has given back a bit over half of its rise from last year’s low — 60% of it. Chart-watchers call 61.8%-65% given back the "golden pocket" — for this company that is $261.56 to $263.43. It is watched widely enough that orders cluster there, which is the honest reason it matters; it is not a forecast. | 59.6% |
| From the all-time high | it is 12.7% below its all-time high | -12.7% |
| Nearest price level | it is trading 0.6% above a support level at $263.07 — a price it turned at 11 times since 2024-10-15, most recently on 2026-09-10. Since 2024-10-08 it has 4 such levels below the current price and 3 above. Levels like these describe where the price has reversed or paused before; they are not a forecast of where it will go. | -0.6% |
| All-time low | its lowest closing price on record is $15.81 (set on 1996-07-30) | $15.81 |
| Above the all-time low | it is 1574.1% above its all-time low | +1,574% |
Volatility
5
| Band width vs its own 6 months | day-to-day price swings are narrower than usual versus its own recent 6-month history (tighter than about 81% of it) | 19th percentile |
|---|---|---|
| Typical daily range | in a typical session it travels about $5.40 between its high and its low — about 2.0% of its price. That is its "average true range" over the last 14 sessions, which also counts the distance from the previous close, so a day that opens well away from yesterday counts as the large move it was | $5.40 |
| Bollinger bands (20-day, ±2σ) | most of its recent trading has stayed between about $258.55 and $276.15 — the "Bollinger bands", a range drawn two standard deviations either side of its 20-day average price, which widens when the stock gets more volatile and narrows when it settles | $258.55 – $267.35 – $276.15 |
| Typical daily range (% of price) | its price moves about 2.0% in a typical session — calmer than most companies we cover. This is the average gap between a session's high and low over the last 14 sessions, counting overnight moves, expressed against the current price so it can be compared with companies trading at any price | 2.0% |
| Stretch from the 200-day average | it is trading 0.8 daily ranges below its 200-day average price (1.6% below it in plain percentage terms) — a way of asking how far it has stretched from its own average in units of how far it normally moves in a day, so a calm company and a jumpy one can be compared on the same scale | 0.8 daily ranges below its 200-day average |
Volume
1
| Volume vs its 30-day average | trading volume is about normal versus its 30-day average | 0.87× |
|---|
Analyst
2
| Change in the average price target | analysts have cut their average price target by 0.6% since the prior reading | -0.6% |
|---|---|---|
| Change in the consensus rating | the analyst consensus rating is unchanged since the prior reading | unchanged |
Candlestick patterns
2
| Since a doji | 4 sessions ago it opened and closed at almost the same price after trading through a wider range — a "doji", the classic picture of buyers and sellers finishing the session level | 4 sessions ago |
|---|---|---|
| Since a bullish engulfing | 3 sessions ago it opened below the previous session's close and finished above that session's open — a "bullish engulfing" pair, where one up day more than undid the down day before it | 3 sessions ago |
Price gaps
2
| Gap at the open | it opened on 2026-10-08 0.7% below the previous session's close — an overnight gap, the part of the move that happened while the market was shut, and traded back through that level before the close | -0.7% |
|---|---|---|
| Gap filled | a 4.9% gap up opened on 2026-07-28 has been "filled" 48 sessions ago — price traded back through the level the gap left behind, and it took 3 sessions to close | 48 sessions ago |
Price streaks
1
| Closing streak | it closed higher in its latest session, after a session that did not close higher — a single up day rather than a run | 1 session up |
|---|
Relative strength
4
| vs market, 1 month | over the past 1 month this stock lagged the market by 2.5 percentage points (the stock lost 1.5% while the market gained 1.0%) | -2.5% |
|---|---|---|
| vs market, 3 months | over the past 3 months this stock lagged the market by 4.0 percentage points (the stock lost 0.1% while the market gained 3.8%) | -4.0% |
| vs market, 6 months | over the past 6 months this stock lagged the market by 15.0 percentage points (the stock gained 2.4% while the market gained 17.5%) | -15.0% |
| vs market, 12 months | over the past 12 months this stock lagged the market by 10.2 percentage points (the stock gained 4.7% while the market gained 15.0%) | -10.3% |
Signal agreement
2
| Bullish technical signals | 1 of the 9 technical signals we can compute for it is currently in a bullish state: a "golden cross" — its 50-day average is above its 200-day — these describe past price behaviour, not a forecast | 1 of 9 |
|---|---|---|
| Bearish technical signals | 4 of the 9 technical signals we can compute for it are currently in a bearish state: trading below its 200-day average, MACD momentum is negative, lagging the market over 6 months, trading below the Ichimoku cloud — these describe past price behaviour, not a forecast | 4 of 9 |
Trend (Ichimoku cloud)
1
| Vs the Ichimoku cloud | trading 5.9% below the Ichimoku cloud — a band drawn from where its own highs and lows sat up to 2026-09-01 and projected forward over today's price, the side traders read as an established downtrend, with the band above acting as the level that would have to be cleared. The band itself is thin, spanning 0.0% of the share price, which is taken to mean a barrier that gives way easily. | -5.9% |
|---|
Volume-weighted price
2
| Vs this year’s average price paid | the price is 2% below the average price paid so far this year, so the typical buyer over that stretch is under water. That average is $270.30 — a volume-weighted average of daily closes over 190 sessions, not a true tick-by-tick VWAP. | -2.1% |
|---|---|---|
| Vs the average paid since it last reported | the price is 4% below the average price paid since it last reported on 2026-07-28 (its 8-K), so the typical buyer over that stretch is under water. That average is $276.38 — a volume-weighted average of daily closes over 52 sessions, not a true tick-by-tick VWAP. | -4.2% |
Head and shoulders, bearish — broke down · entry $263.61 · 67 sessions in
Price levels it has turned at before
ITW last closed at $264.71 on 2026-10-08. Since 2024-10-08 it has turned at 4 prices below its last close and 3 above; the 3 nearest below and the 3 nearest above are listed, nearest first.
| Level | Side | Distance | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| $263.07 | Support | 0.6% below the last close | turned there 11 times · 2024-10-15 to 2026-09-10 |
| $268.65 | Resistance | 1.5% above the last close | turned there five times · 2025-08-13 to 2026-03-25 |
| $255.26 | Support | 3.6% below the last close | turned there 11 times · 2024-10-29 to 2026-10-01 |
| $276.40 | Resistance | 4.4% above the last close | turned there 7 times · 2024-11-06 to 2026-09-25 |
| $248.62 | Support | 6.1% below the last close | turned there six times · 2025-03-12 to 2026-04-30 |
| $301.70 | Resistance | 14.0% above the last close | turned there three times · 2026-02-12 to 2026-08-06 |
A level is a price this company reversed or paused at more than once — they describe past behaviour, not a forecast of where the price will go.
Wave structure
Its recent swings can be read as a three-part downward correction — the A-B-C shape chartists use for a pullback — now complete.
This labelling fails — stops being a possible reading at all — if it closes below $255.69.
It is the only labelling that fits these swings, though its proportions are not the textbook ones.
This reading has stood for 5 trading days, since 2026-10-02.
Read from daily closes as of 2026-10-08.
An Elliott-wave count describes the swings already printed and the level that would disprove it. It is not a forecast, a target, or advice.
Screens: Trading below the 200-day moving average · lagging the market · Near the golden pocket (has given back about two thirds of its 52-week move) · Under water since its last earnings report (below the anchored VWAP) · Trading below the Ichimoku cloud · Near a support level (sitting on a price it has bounced off before) | Learn: moving average · golden cross · adx · rsi · macd · breakout
Based on daily closing prices as of 2026-10-08. Describes past price behavior only — informational, not financial advice.
Analyst consensus
- Consensus ratingHold (3.19 mean, 1=Strong Buy…5=Strong Sell) — 14 analysts
- Mean price target$300.64 range $249.00 – $350.00; median $302.50
Analyst estimates, as of 2026-10-03. These are third-party analyst opinions and price targets, aggregated — not a recommendation, prediction, or advice from stocks-llm. Informational only.
Analyst EPS estimate for ITW
- Consensus EPS estimate$2.97 next reporting period, as of 2026-10-03
- Estimate change, 30 days+$0.00356 (+0.1%) from $2.97, on 2026-08-28, 36-day window
- Readings revised upward38% of 8 comparable readings
The consensus estimate for the next reporting period, and how it has moved between readings of that SAME period. A change is measured only between readings estimating one period — when a company reports, the consensus moves to the next quarter and the two numbers are not comparable. Informational only, not a forecast and not advice.
Key risks (from latest filing)
["Exposure to macroeconomic conditions, including global industrial production and automotive demand fluctuations.","Risk associated with integrated global supply chains and potential disruptions in sourcing raw materials.","Potential for increased competitive pressures and pricing sensitivity in the varied end-markets served."]
What changed in the latest 10-Q
AI-assisted comparison of ITW's 10-Q filed 2026-05-07 against the prior one filed 2025-10-24.
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
- Added:
- Newer filing (2026-05-07): Company had 88 divisions as of December 31, 2025
- Newer filing (2026-05-07): Company had approximately 43,000 people in 49 countries
- Newer filing (2026-05-07): Description of 80/20 Front-to-Back includes explicit reference to maximizing performance for 'largest and most profitable customers' and minimizing costs for 'less profitable accounts'
- Newer filing (2026-05-07): Section titled 'NEXT PHASE: 2024 - 2030' (compared to older section 'OUR NEXT PHASE: 2024 - 2030')
- Newer filing (2026-05-07): 'Achieving high-quality organic growth of four percent or more through the cycle is the Company's highest priority in the Next Phase'
- Newer filing (2026-05-07): New section 'Portfolio Discipline' introduced at end of text
- Removed:
- Older filing (2025-10-24): Company had 86 divisions as of December 31, 2024
- Older filing (2025-10-24): Company had approximately 44,000 people in 51 countries
- Older filing (2025-10-24): Detailed description of 80/20 as 'initially introduced as a manufacturing efficiency tool in the 1980s'
- Older filing (2025-10-24): Reference to 'approximately 20,900 granted and pending patents'
- Older filing (2025-10-24): Statement that restructuring initiatives 'may also result in restructuring initiatives that reduce costs and improve profitability and returns'
- Older filing (2025-10-24): Phrase 'if not more so' regarding competitive advantage in next phase
- Older filing (2025-10-24): Phrase 'to read, react, respond and evolve' regarding fast adaptor capability
- Reworded:
- Newer filing (2026-05-07) emphasizes ITW Business Model as 'primary competitive advantage' versus older filing (2025-10-24) stating it 'is the Company's competitive advantage'
- Newer filing (2026-05-07) describes ITW Business Model framework rather than older filing's 'how ITW creates value'
- Newer filing (2026-05-07) titles section 'ENTERPRISE STRATEGY: LEVERAGING THE ITW BUSINESS MODEL TO ITS FULL POTENTIAL' versus older 'ENTERPRISE STRATEGY: 2012 - 2023'
- Newer filing (2026-05-07) states 'Since the initiation of the Enterprise Strategy in 2012' versus older 'In late 2012, ITW began its strategic framework'
- Newer filing (2026-05-07) uses 'high-quality above-market organic growth' versus older 'solid and consistent above-market organic growth'
- Newer filing (2026-05-07) capitalizes 'Next Phase' and refers to 'Next Phase of the Company's Enterprise Strategy' versus older 'Next Phase of the Company's evolution'
- Newer filing (2026-05-07) states 'capable of reading and reacting to market shifts with agility' versus older 'to read, react, respond and evolve'
- Newer filing (2026-05-07) describes ability as 'defining strength' versus older 'defining competitive advantage'
- Newer filing (2026-05-07) uses 'continuing to improve the quality of practice' versus older 'sustain its foundational strengths'
- Newer filing (2026-05-07) emphasizes 'pivoting decisively' language not present in older filing
- Notes:
- The two filings cover different fiscal periods (Q1 2026 versus Q3 2025) and reflect updates to company structure and strategy
- Text of newer filing appears truncated at 'Portfolio Discipline' section, limiting full comparison of that section
- Some wording differences may reflect stylistic refinement rather than substantive policy changes
AI-assisted comparison of two SEC filing sections. It describes wording and theme changes only, makes no materiality, legal, or investment judgement, and is not financial advice. Informational only — not financial advice.
Insider activity (SEC Form 4)
0 open-market purchases and 5 open-market sales by insiders in the last 90 days, of which we have read Form 4 filings through 2026-10-04. The 5 days since 2026-10-04 have not been checked yet.
- Last 90 days · read to 2026-10-040 buys · 5 sells ($12M) — 2 selling insiders
- Last 180 days · read to 2026-10-041 buy ($199880) · 5 sells ($12M) — 1 buying, 2 selling insiders
Activity heuristic: net selling (a transparent product heuristic from the counts above, not a prediction or advice)
Most recent open-market transaction: 2026-08-19. Based on Form 4 filings read through 2026-10-04; anything filed since is not yet included.
View full insider trading history → View SEC Form 3/4/5 filingsAsk about ITW's insider activity →
Only open-market purchases (SEC code P) and sales (code S) are counted here. Option exercises, vesting/awards, gifts, and shares withheld for taxes are excluded — they are compensation or mechanical, not open-market conviction. Sales may be planned and non-discretionary (e.g. a Rule 10b5-1 plan) and are not necessarily bearish; open-market buying is not a recommendation to buy. Informational only — not financial advice.
U.S. House trading disclosures
U.S. House members publicly disclose their own, their spouse's, and dependent children's stock transactions under the STOCK Act. We hold 16 matched disclosures for ITW from U.S. House Clerk Periodic Transaction Report filings.
U.S. House trading disclosures →Institutional ownership (13F)
6 institutional 13F filers reported holding ITW as of 2026-06-30 (quarter-end position, filed within 45 days).
- Distinct 13F filers 6
- Reported shares held 38,499,082
- Reported value $10,433,140,799
reported quarterly holdings change (2026-03-31 → 2026-06-30): 0 new, 4 increased, 2 decreased, 0 exited. Change counts cover only managers that filed 13F reports in BOTH quarters, derived between two quarter-end snapshots — not same-day trades; a single manager is never said to have "bought" or "sold".
Institutional holdings are quarter-end long positions reported on SEC Form 13F-HR, filed up to 45 days after the quarter ends — they are delayed, are not real-time trades, exclude short positions and most non-US securities, and are not investment advice. Any increase/decrease is a reported change between two quarterly snapshots, not a same-day purchase or sale. These are quarter-end snapshots from the 13F filings on SEC EDGAR, filed within 45 days — not real-time, and any change is a difference between two quarterly reports, not a same-day trade. Informational only — not financial advice.
Ask about ITW's institutional holders → See what each manager we track holds →
Short interest (FINRA)
ITW had 8,757,539 shares of reported short interest as of the 2026-09-15 FINRA settlement date (delayed, bi-monthly; not real-time).
ITW had 3.07% of its shares outstanding sold short as of the 2026-09-15 FINRA settlement date (percent of FLOAT would be higher — float is not disclosed in the source). FINRA reported 7.18 days to cover at the same settlement.
- Reported short interest (shares) 8,757,539
- Short interest (% of shares outstanding) 3.07%
- Prior settlement (shares) 8,759,556
- Reported change -0.02%
- Days to cover (reported) 7.18
Reported to FINRA as of the 2026-09-15 settlement date. Short interest is reported to FINRA and published on a delayed, bi-monthly schedule (as of a settlement date, disseminated roughly eight business days later) — it is NOT real-time, does not cover every venue or all US trading, and is not a short-squeeze prediction or investment advice. Days-to-cover is the value FINRA reports; percent of float is not shown because the source file carries no share-count denominator — where a percent appears it is of shares OUTSTANDING, the larger base, and is therefore a floor on percent of float. Informational only — not financial advice.
Competitors & peers
- Parker-Hannifin (PH)
- Eaton (ETN)
- Emerson Electric (EMR)
- Dover (DOV)
- Stanley Black & Decker (SWK)
- 3M Company (MMM)
AI-enriched competitor set. Linked names are companies covered by stocks-llm; other named peers are shown for reference only.
Compare ITW vs…
Illinois Tool Works is found in…
ITW ranks in…
ITW shows up in…
Frequently asked questions
What does Illinois Tool Works (ITW) do?
Illinois Tool Works Inc. is a diversified manufacturer that operates through a decentralized business model, providing engineered components, consumables, and related equipment across various industrial segments. The company's diverse product portfolio serves global markets, including automotive, construction, food equipment, polymers, fluids, and welding sectors.
What sector is Illinois Tool Works (ITW) in?
Illinois Tool Works (ITW) is classified in the Industrials sector. Its industry is Diversified Industrial Manufacturing. It trades on NYSE.
Does ITW pay a dividend?
Yes — Illinois Tool Works (ITW) pays a dividend, with an indicated yield of about 2.39% and at least 18 years of non-decreasing per-share dividends (SEC EDGAR XBRL) — we do not hold the year before it, so the real streak may be longer (market data, as of 2026-09-02). Informational only — not financial advice.
Who are Illinois Tool Works's (ITW) competitors?
Notable peers of Illinois Tool Works (ITW) include Parker-Hannifin, Eaton, Emerson Electric, Dover and Stanley Black & Decker. This peer set is informational only — not financial advice.
Has there been recent U.S. House stock trading in ITW?
Yes — we hold 16 matched STOCK Act disclosures for ITW from U.S. House Clerk Periodic Transaction Report filings. These are legally-required disclosures (often filed 30–45 days after the trade), may belong to a U.S. House member, their spouse, or a dependent child, and are not an indicator of company performance or investment advice.
Is Illinois Tool Works (ITW) overbought or oversold right now?
Illinois Tool Works (ITW) is currently neither overbought nor oversold — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 45, in the neutral middle (as of 2026-10-08). RSI describes recent price momentum, not a forecast — informational only, not financial advice.
Where does stocks-llm's data on ITW come from?
Fundamentals come from SEC XBRL company filings for the figures marked with a fiscal year, and market data, as of 2026-09-02 for the rest; prices are market data, as of 2026-09-02; company filings and profile facts come from SEC EDGAR. All figures are delayed daily-close data shown with their as-of date — informational only, not financial advice.
Fundamentals: SEC XBRL company filings for the figures marked with a fiscal year, and market data, as of 2026-09-02 for the rest. Filings: SEC EDGAR. Prices are delayed daily-close data.
Last updated 2026-10-08.
Informational only — NOT financial advice. All figures are delayed daily-close data from SEC EDGAR & market data, shown with their as-of date.