Lucid Motors (LCID)
Consumer Discretionary · Electric Vehicles · NASDAQ
Lucid Motors is a premium, vertically integrated electric vehicle manufacturer focused on high-performance mobility and software-defined platforms.
What Lucid Motors does
Lucid Motors is a technology company specializing in the design, engineering, and manufacturing of premium, software-defined electric vehicles. The company utilizes a vertical integration strategy, developing its own hardware and software for its current vehicle lineup, the Lucid Air and Lucid Gravity, and its forthcoming Midsize platform. Lucid sells and services its vehicles directly to consumers through an integrated network of retail showrooms, online channels, and dedicated service centers.
Themes: electric vehicles, luxury automotive, autonomous driving technology, vertical integration, robotaxis
Fundamentals
- Price$5.51 as of 2026-08-21 close
- Market cap$2.2B as of 2026-08-21
- 1-year return-73.6% 2025-08-21 close $20.90 → 2026-08-21 close $5.51
- P/En/a negative earnings
- Net margin-249.2% as of 2026-08-24
- Gross margin-93.7% as of 2026-08-24
- ROE-145.4% as of 2026-08-24
- Debt / equity1.82 as of 2026-08-24
- Revenue growth (YoY)+67.6% FY2025 vs FY2024, SEC XBRL
- Revenue CAGR (3y)+30.6% SEC XBRL
- Beta1.02 as of 2026-08-24
- Last reported earnings2026-08-04 SEC EDGAR Form 8-K (Item 2.02)
How LCID compares in its sector
- net profit marginbottom 10% 334 covered Consumer Discretionary peers, as of 2026-08-24
- operating marginbottom 10% 334 covered Consumer Discretionary peers, as of 2026-08-24
- gross marginbottom 10% 331 covered Consumer Discretionary peers, as of 2026-08-24
- return on equitybottom 10% 334 covered Consumer Discretionary peers, as of 2026-08-24
- 3-year revenue CAGRtop 10% 325 covered Consumer Discretionary peers
- free cash flow (absolute dollars, latest fiscal year)bottom 10% 311 covered Consumer Discretionary peers, as of FY2025
Position among covered Consumer Discretionary companies that report each metric (minimum 5 peers). A relative position within our covered catalog — not a valuation, quality, or investment judgment. A higher percentile is simply a higher value (for P/E, more expensive on earnings — never "better"). Informational only.
Top 10 scores & list membership
LCID is not currently in any published Top 10 list. Its scores are below.
Long-term score
Not scored for the long-term list: no valuation data.
Short-term score
26.2 #1676 of 1,704 scored · #183 of 186 in Consumer Discretionary
Catalysts 39th: open-market insider buys in 90 days 12, the analyst consensus rating is unchanged since the prior reading; momentum 36th: near the bottom of its 14-day range (oversold); weakest is volume and participation 2nd: trading volume is unusually light — only about 33% of its 30-day average.
Scores as of 21 Aug 2026. Each bar is a percentile: how this company ranked against every company the score ranked, 0–100. A list is a published formula and its output, not a recommendation. Method version 2.
How Lucid Motors looks technically
Lucid Motors (LCID) is trading 40.8% below its 200-day average, the long-term trend line — a long-term downtrend. Its 50-day average crossed below its 200-day average about 437 trading days ago — a "death cross", a bearish long-term signal. A trend is forming but not yet strong — ADX, a 0–100 trend-strength gauge, is 22 (a reading of 25+ marks a strong trend). Momentum is neutral — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 38, neither overbought (above 70) nor oversold (below 30). It just made a new 20-day low, its first since 2026-07-14, breaking below its recent trading range. It is 78.2% below its highest point of the past year. Trading volume is unusually light — only about 33% of its 30-day average.
Trend
7
| Distance from the 200-day | it is trading 40.8% below its 200-day average, the long-term trend line — a long-term downtrend | -40.8% |
|---|---|---|
| 50-day moving average | its average price over the last 50 trading days — a short-term trend line — is $6.26 | $6.26 |
| 200-day moving average | its average price over the last 200 trading days — the long-term trend line — is $9.31 | $9.31 |
| Swing structure | each recent peak has been higher than the one before it and each dip has been shallower — the pattern chart-watchers call an uptrend, which describes where price has already been and not where it goes next | higher highs and higher lows |
| Last swing turn | its last significant turn was a swing low 16 calendar days ago — the swings before that are what the structure reading is measured on | 16 sessions |
| Since the 50/200 cross | its 50-day average crossed below its 200-day average about 437 trading days ago — a "death cross", a bearish long-term signal | 437 sessions |
| Trend strength (14-day ADX) | a trend is forming but not yet strong — ADX, a 0–100 trend-strength gauge, is 22 (a reading of 25+ marks a strong trend) | 22.3 |
Momentum
3
| 14-day RSI | momentum is neutral — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 38, neither overbought (above 70) nor oversold (below 30) | 38.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Position in its 14-day range | it is trading right at the bottom of its 14-day range ($5.41 to $7.95) — its "stochastic" reading is 4 out of 100, where 0 would mean closing exactly at the 14-session low and 100 exactly at the high. This measures WHERE the price sits inside its recent range, which is a different question from the RSI beside it: RSI is a momentum gauge, measuring how FAST the price has been moving, so a stock can drift quietly to the bottom of its range with an ordinary RSI, or fall sharply and still sit in the middle. It has been slipping within that range over the last few sessions. | 3.9 |
| Since the MACD crossed zero | MACD, a trend-momentum gauge, is in negative territory (momentum leaning bearish) | 12 sessions |
Range
12
| 52-week high | its highest closing price over the past year (about 252 trading days) was $25.23 | $25.23 |
|---|---|---|
| From the 52-week high | it is 78.2% below its 52-week high (its highest price of the past year) | -78.2% |
| Above the 52-week low | it is 132.5% above its 52-week low (its lowest price of the past year) | +132.5% |
| Below the 52-week high | it is 78.2% below its highest point of the past year | 78.2% |
| Since a 20-day breakout | it just made a new 20-day low, its first since 2026-07-14, breaking below its recent trading range | 1 session |
| Since a 55-day breakout | it made a new 55-day high about 17 trading days ago | 17 sessions |
| All-time high | its highest closing price on record is $648.60 (set on 2021-02-18) | $648.60 |
| Given back of the 52-week move | over the past year its closes ranged ($4.62 to $24.77), and it has recovered only a small part of its fall from last year’s high — 4% of it. Chart-watchers call 61.8%-65% given back the "golden pocket" — for this company that is $17.07 to $17.72. It is watched widely enough that orders cluster there, which is the honest reason it matters; it is not a forecast. | 4.4% |
| From the all-time high | it is 99.2% below its all-time high | -99.2% |
| Nearest price level | it is trading 1.4% below a resistance level at $5.58 — a price it turned at twice since 2026-04-29, most recently on 2026-05-21. Since 2024-08-21 it has 0 such levels below the current price and 17 above. Levels like these describe where the price has reversed or paused before; they are not a forecast of where it will go. | +1.4% |
| All-time low | its lowest closing price on record is $2.37 (set on 2026-07-14) | $2.37 |
| Above the all-time low | it is 132.5% above its all-time low | +132.5% |
Volatility
5
| Band width vs its own 6 months | day-to-day price swings are wider than usual versus its own recent 6-month history (wider than about 79% of it) | 79th percentile |
|---|---|---|
| Typical daily range | in a typical session it travels about $0.5885 between its high and its low — about 10.7% of its price. That is its "average true range" over the last 14 sessions, which also counts the distance from the previous close, so a day that opens well away from yesterday counts as the large move it was | $0.5885 |
| Bollinger bands (20-day, ±2σ) | most of its recent trading has stayed between about $5.21 and $8.35 — the "Bollinger bands", a range drawn two standard deviations either side of its 20-day average price, which widens when the stock gets more volatile and narrows when it settles | $5.21 – $6.78 – $8.35 |
| Typical daily range (% of price) | its price moves about 10.7% in a typical session — among the most volatile in the catalog. This is the average gap between a session's high and low over the last 14 sessions, counting overnight moves, expressed against the current price so it can be compared with companies trading at any price | 10.7% |
| Stretch from the 200-day average | it is trading 6.5 daily ranges below its 200-day average price (40.8% below it in plain percentage terms) — a way of asking how far it has stretched from its own average in units of how far it normally moves in a day, so a calm company and a jumpy one can be compared on the same scale | 6.5 daily ranges below its 200-day average |
Volume
1
| Volume vs its 30-day average | trading volume is unusually light — only about 33% of its 30-day average | 0.33× |
|---|
Analyst
2
| Change in the average price target | analysts have cut their average price target by 3.7% since the prior reading | -3.7% |
|---|---|---|
| Change in the consensus rating | the analyst consensus rating is unchanged since the prior reading | unchanged |
Candlestick patterns
3
| Since a doji | 2 sessions ago it opened and closed at almost the same price after trading through a wider range — a "doji", the classic picture of buyers and sellers finishing the session level | 2 sessions ago |
|---|---|---|
| Since a hammer | 2 sessions ago, after a stretch of decline, it sold off hard during the session and then closed back near its high — a "hammer", the long lower wick showing the drop was bought back before the close | 2 sessions ago |
| Since a bearish engulfing | 1 session ago it opened above the previous session's close and finished below that session's open — a "bearish engulfing" pair, where one down day more than undid the up day before it | 1 session ago |
Price gaps
3
| Gap at the open | it opened on 2026-08-21 0.4% above the previous session's close — an overnight gap, the part of the move that happened while the market was shut, and traded back through that level before the close | +0.4% |
|---|---|---|
| Open gap | it gapped 10.7% below the previous close 12 sessions ago and has not traded back through the level it left behind at 7.78 — an "unfilled gap", which describes a price range no trade has since crossed and is not a forecast that it will be crossed | -10.7% |
| Gap filled | a 3.1% gap down opened on 2026-08-13 has been "filled" 5 sessions ago — price traded back through the level the gap left behind, and it took 1 session to close | 5 sessions ago |
Price streaks
1
| Closing streak | it has closed lower 2 sessions in a row, a -6.93% move over the run — an unbroken run of down days, which describes what has already happened and says nothing about the next session | 2 sessions down |
|---|
Relative strength
4
| vs market, 1 month | over the past 1 month this stock lagged the market by 27.1 percentage points (the stock lost 24.7% while the market gained 2.3%) | -27.1% |
|---|---|---|
| vs market, 3 months | over the past 3 months this stock lagged the market by 8.7 percentage points (the stock lost 5.7% while the market gained 3.1%) | -8.8% |
| vs market, 6 months | over the past 6 months this stock lagged the market by 53.4 percentage points (the stock lost 42.3% while the market gained 11.1%) | -53.4% |
| vs market, 12 months | over the past 12 months this stock lagged the market by 94.1 percentage points (the stock lost 73.6% while the market gained 20.5%) | -94.1% |
Signal agreement
2
| Bullish technical signals | 2 of the 9 technical signals we can compute for it are currently in a bullish state: near the bottom of its 14-day range (oversold), trading above the Ichimoku cloud — these describe past price behaviour, not a forecast | 2 of 9 |
|---|---|---|
| Bearish technical signals | 5 of the 9 technical signals we can compute for it are currently in a bearish state: a "death cross" — its 50-day average is below its 200-day, trading below its 200-day average, a fresh 20-day low, MACD momentum is negative, lagging the market over 6 months — these describe past price behaviour, not a forecast | 5 of 9 |
Trend (Ichimoku cloud)
1
| Vs the Ichimoku cloud | trading 18% above the Ichimoku cloud — a band drawn from where its own highs and lows sat up to 2026-07-16 and projected forward over today's price, the side traders read as an established uptrend, with the band below acting as the level that would have to give way. The band itself is thin, spanning 0.4% of the share price, which is taken to mean a barrier that gives way easily. | +18.1% |
|---|
Volume-weighted price
2
| Vs this year’s average price paid | the price is 23% below the average price paid so far this year, so the typical buyer over that stretch is under water. That average is $7.19 — a volume-weighted average of daily closes over 155 sessions, not a true tick-by-tick VWAP. | -23.4% |
|---|---|---|
| Vs the average paid since it last reported | the price is 12% below the average price paid since it last reported on 2026-07-02 (its 8-K), so the typical buyer over that stretch is under water. That average is $6.24 — a volume-weighted average of daily closes over 36 sessions, not a true tick-by-tick VWAP. | -11.6% |
Price levels it has turned at before
LCID last closed at $5.51 on 2026-08-21. Since 2024-08-21 it has turned at 0 prices below its last close and 17 above; the 3 nearest above are listed, nearest first.
| Level | Side | Distance | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| $5.58 | Resistance | 1.4% above the last close | turned there twice · 2026-04-29 to 2026-05-21 |
| $6.15 | Resistance | 11.6% above the last close | turned there twice · 2026-07-24 to 2026-08-05 |
| $6.75 | Resistance | 22.4% above the last close | turned there twice · 2026-05-04 to 2026-05-13 |
A level is a price this company reversed or paused at more than once — they describe past behaviour, not a forecast of where the price will go.
Wave structure
No Elliott-wave labelling currently fits its swings: the recent highs and lows do not satisfy the three rules a five-wave count has to obey, so there is no count to show rather than a count we are unsure about.
Read from daily closes as of 2026-08-21.
An Elliott-wave count describes the swings already printed and the level that would disprove it. It is not a forecast, a target, or advice.
Screens: Trading below the 200-day moving average · Pulled back from the 12-month high · Broke down to a new 20-day low · Analyst price target recently CUT · lagging the market · Most volatile (6%+ typical daily range) | Learn: moving average · golden cross · adx · rsi · breakout · fifty two week high low · volume and relative volume
Based on daily closing prices as of 2026-08-21. Describes past price behavior only — informational, not financial advice.
Analyst consensus
- Consensus ratingHold (3.17 mean, 1=Strong Buy…5=Strong Sell) — 10 analysts
- Mean price target$7.90 range $5.00 – $17.00; median $7.00
Analyst estimates, as of 2026-08-22. These are third-party analyst opinions and price targets, aggregated — not a recommendation, prediction, or advice from stocks-llm. Informational only.
Analyst EPS estimate for LCID
- Consensus EPS estimate-$2.28 next reporting period, as of 2026-08-22
Change over time is not available yet: it needs two readings of the same reporting period at least 30 days apart, and we have been recording these estimates since 2026-08-04. An estimate for a DIFFERENT quarter is not a revision, so a reading from before the last report is never compared with one after it.
The consensus estimate for the next reporting period, and how it has moved between readings of that SAME period. A change is measured only between readings estimating one period — when a company reports, the consensus moves to the next quarter and the two numbers are not comparable. Informational only, not a forecast and not advice.
Key risks (from latest filing)
["Significant ongoing cash burn and reliance on capital raises or credit facilities to fund operations.","Substantial operating losses and uncertainty regarding the achievement of long-term profitability.","Operational risks associated with production scaling, supply chain management, and aligning production volumes with market demand."]
What changed in the latest 10-Q
AI-assisted comparison of LCID's 10-Q filed 2026-05-05 against the prior one filed 2025-11-05.
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
- Added:
- Series C Subscription Agreement section with Ayar investment of $550.0 million in Series C Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock (April 2026)
- Second VPA with Uber for 25,000 Lucid Midsize Plus vehicles as robotaxis over six-year period starting late 2028
- Offset provision under first VPA increasing aggregate Lucid Gravity Plus and Lucid Midsize Plus commitment to at least 35,000 units
- Uber private placement of $200.0 million in common stock via SMB subscription agreement (April 2026)
- 2026 Underwriting Agreement with net proceeds of $291.5 million (April 2026)
- DDTL Credit Facility borrowing of $500.0 million and amendment increasing aggregate commitments to approximately $2.5 billion
- DDTL Amendment eliminating minimum liquidity covenant and removing requirement to fully utilize ABL Credit Agreement before DDTL borrowings
- CEO Announcement section regarding Silvio Napoli's appointment as next CEO
- Reference to 'shaping the future of mobility' and 'software-defined vehicle platforms' in company mission
- Reference to 'upcoming Midsize platform' in Overview section
- Removed:
- Company mission statement 'with a mission to advance the state-of-the-art of EV technology for the benefit of all'
- Statement that company is 'setting new standards with the world's most advanced EVs'
- Specific delivery and production numbers for three and nine months ended September 30, 2025 (3,891 vehicles produced, 4,078 delivered; 9,966 produced, 10,496 delivered)
- Reference to Lucid Air deliveries beginning in October 2021
- Details about Lucid Gravity commercial production and deliveries starting December 2024
- Statement about Midsize platform scheduled for start of production in late 2026
- Detailed explanation of challenges in introducing new vehicles at accelerated pace
- Statement about leveraging insights from Lucid Air and Gravity production ramps
- Single Vehicle Production Agreement section (first VPA from July 16, 2025) with 20,000 Lucid Gravity Plus minimum commitment
- Details about Nuro, Inc. collaboration as autonomous driving software provider
- Private Placement section detailing 2025 Subscription Agreement with SMB with formula-based pricing and September 2025 completion with 13,715,121 shares issued
- Statement on proceeds use for non-recurring engineering costs and general corporate purposes
- Reverse Stock Split section describing August 29, 2025 one-for-ten split and September 2, 2025 trading adjustment
- Reference to 'recently enacted' regarding OBBBA law (older filing language)
- Reworded:
- Overview opening changed from 'with a mission to advance the state-of-the-art of EV technology for the benefit of all' to 'that is shaping the future of mobility through our innovations, advanced technology, and software-defined vehicle platforms'
- Company description changed from 'setting new standards with the world's most advanced EVs' to 'Our award-winning Lucid Air and Lucid Gravity set new standards'
- Distribution description changed from 'through direct online sales' to 'through online channels'
- Customer experience language changed from 'an opportunity to closely manage' to 'provides the best opportunity to closely manage'
- Service capabilities language changed from 'we established and continue to grow' to 'we continue to grow'
- Collision repair description changed from 'also serve in some cases as repair hubs for our mobile service offerings' to 'in some cases serve as repair hubs for mobile service'
- Reference to 'ten-year form' changed to '2026 Underwriting Agreement' in newer filing
- OBBBA description language changed from 'recently enacted' to 'enacted' (implicit timeline shift)
- Reference form 10-K year changed from 2024 to 2025, with filing date changed from February 25, 2025 to February 24, 2026
- Notes:
- Older filing text for OBBBA discussion is truncated at 'It a' and newer filing appears similarly truncated, limiting full comparison of that section
- Older filing is for nine months ended September 30, 2025; newer filing is for three months ended March 31, 2026 - different reporting periods
- Recent Developments section structure substantially reorganized between filings with multiple new transactions added
Risk Factors
- Added:
- Added reference to artificial intelligence in data privacy and cybersecurity risk factor (filed 2026-05-05)
- Removed:
- Removed 'We do not have a third-party retail product distribution and full-service network' bullet point (was in filed 2025-11-05)
- Removed 'including possible unfavorable' and replaced with simpler language in geopolitical risk factor
- Removed 'geopolitical' reference from international operations risk factor (replaced with different phrasing)
- Reworded:
- Changed 'Failure to attract customers, failure to complete the purchase process with customers, and customer cancellation of orders' to 'Failure to attract or retain customers through the purchase process' (filed 2026-05-05)
- Changed 'Our distribution model primarily relies on a direct-to-consumer strategy' from previous language about not having third-party retail distribution (filed 2026-05-05)
- Changed 'geopolitical, tax' to 'geopolitical, tax' but with 'possible' added before 'unfavorable' in the international operations risk (2026-05-05 adds 'possible')
- Changed 'If we fail to manage our future growth effectively' to 'If we fail to manage our growth effectively' (removed 'future') (filed 2026-05-05)
- Changed 'Our ability to continue production and our future growth depends' to 'Our ability to continue production and grow depends' (filed 2026-05-05)
- Changed 'the inability of these suppliers to deliver necessary components of our products according to our schedule and at prices, quality levels and volumes acceptable to us, or our inability to efficiently manage these components or to implement or maintain effective inventory management and other systems, processes and personnel to support ongoing and increased production' to simpler language 'the inability of these suppliers to deliver necessary components of our products, or our inability to efficiently manage these components' (filed 2026-05-05)
- Changed 'which could result in a variety of inefficiencies in our business and hinder our ability to generate revenue' to 'which could prevent us from maximizing our revenue' (filed 2026-05-05)
- Changed 'Any unauthorized control, manipulation, interruption or compromise of or access to' to 'Any unauthorized compromise of or access to' (filed 2026-05-05)
- Changed 'related to data privacy and cybersecurity' to 'related to data privacy, cybersecurity, and artificial intelligence' (filed 2026-05-05)
- Changed 'any actual or perceived failure to comply' to 'failure to comply' (filed 2026-05-05)
- Changed 'harm our reputation and brand' to 'harm our reputation' (removed 'and brand') (filed 2026-05-05)
- Changed 'We may fail to adequately obtain, maintain, enforce, defend and protect our intellectual property and may not be able to prevent third parties from unauthorized use of our intellectual property and proprietary technology, which could harm our competitive position and cause us to incur significant expenses to enforce our rights' to shorter version without 'If we are unsuccessful in any of the foregoing' clause (filed 2026-05-05)
- Changed 'Aston Martin, Uber and Nuro' to 'Aston Martin, Uber, and Nuro' (added serial comma) (filed 2026-05-05)
- Notes:
- Text in both filings appears truncated at end; comparison limited to what is visible
- Some grammatical and formatting adjustments may reflect document standardization rather than substantive policy changes
AI-assisted comparison of two SEC filing sections. It describes wording and theme changes only, makes no materiality, legal, or investment judgement, and is not financial advice. Informational only — not financial advice.
Insider activity (SEC Form 4)
0 open-market purchases and 2 open-market sales by insiders in the last 90 days.
- Last 30 days0 buys · 1 sell ($7460) — 1 selling insider
- Last 90 days0 buys · 2 sells ($13840) — 1 selling insider
- Last 180 days0 buys · 2 sells ($13840) — 1 selling insider
Activity heuristic: net selling (a transparent product heuristic from the counts above, not a prediction or advice)
Most recent open-market transaction: 2026-08-03. As of 2026-08-24.
View full insider trading history → View SEC Form 3/4/5 filingsAsk about LCID's insider activity →
Only open-market purchases (SEC code P) and sales (code S) are counted here. Option exercises, vesting/awards, gifts, and shares withheld for taxes are excluded — they are compensation or mechanical, not open-market conviction. Sales may be planned and non-discretionary (e.g. a Rule 10b5-1 plan) and are not necessarily bearish; open-market buying is not a recommendation to buy. Informational only — not financial advice.
Institutional ownership (13F)
4 institutional 13F filers reported holding LCID as of 2026-03-31 (quarter-end position, filed within 45 days).
- Distinct 13F filers 4
- Reported shares held 12,645,954
- Reported value $120,515,944
reported quarterly holdings change (2025-12-31 → 2026-03-31): 0 new, 3 increased, 1 decreased, 0 exited. Change counts cover only managers that filed 13F reports in BOTH quarters, derived between two quarter-end snapshots — not same-day trades; a single manager is never said to have "bought" or "sold".
Institutional holdings are quarter-end long positions reported on SEC Form 13F-HR, filed up to 45 days after the quarter ends — they are delayed, are not real-time trades, exclude short positions and most non-US securities, and are not investment advice. Any increase/decrease is a reported change between two quarterly snapshots, not a same-day purchase or sale. These are quarter-end snapshots from the 13F filings on SEC EDGAR, filed within 45 days — not real-time, and any change is a difference between two quarterly reports, not a same-day trade. Informational only — not financial advice.
Short interest (FINRA)
LCID had 58,809,493 shares of reported short interest as of the 2026-07-31 FINRA settlement date (delayed, bi-monthly; not real-time).
LCID had 14.9% of its shares outstanding sold short as of the 2026-07-31 FINRA settlement date (percent of FLOAT would be higher — float is not disclosed in the source). FINRA reported 2.85 days to cover at the same settlement.
- Reported short interest (shares) 58,809,493
- Short interest (% of shares outstanding) 14.9%
- Prior settlement (shares) 65,009,679
- Reported change -9.54%
- Days to cover (reported) 2.85
Reported to FINRA as of the 2026-07-31 settlement date. Short interest is reported to FINRA and published on a delayed, bi-monthly schedule (as of a settlement date, disseminated roughly eight business days later) — it is NOT real-time, does not cover every venue or all US trading, and is not a short-squeeze prediction or investment advice. Days-to-cover is the value FINRA reports; percent of float is not shown because the source file carries no share-count denominator — where a percent appears it is of shares OUTSTANDING, the larger base, and is therefore a floor on percent of float. Informational only — not financial advice.
Competitors & peers
- Tesla (TSLA)
- Rivian Automotive (RIVN)
- Porsche (POAHY)
- Mercedes-Benz Group (MBGYY)
- BMW (BMWYY)
- Audi (AUDVF)
AI-enriched competitor set. Linked names are companies covered by stocks-llm; other named peers are shown for reference only.
Compare LCID vs…
Frequently asked questions
What does Lucid Motors (LCID) do?
Lucid Motors is a technology company specializing in the design, engineering, and manufacturing of premium, software-defined electric vehicles. The company utilizes a vertical integration strategy, developing its own hardware and software for its current vehicle lineup, the Lucid Air and Lucid Gravity, and its forthcoming Midsize platform. Lucid sells and services its vehicles directly to consumers through an integrated network of retail showrooms, online channels, and dedicated service centers.
What sector is Lucid Motors (LCID) in?
Lucid Motors (LCID) is classified in the Consumer Discretionary sector. Its industry is Electric Vehicles. It trades on NASDAQ.
Who are Lucid Motors's (LCID) competitors?
Notable peers of Lucid Motors (LCID) include Tesla, Rivian Automotive, Porsche, Mercedes-Benz Group and BMW. This peer set is informational only — not financial advice.
Is Lucid Motors (LCID) overbought or oversold right now?
Lucid Motors (LCID) is currently neither overbought nor oversold — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 38, in the neutral middle (as of 2026-08-21). RSI describes recent price momentum, not a forecast — informational only, not financial advice.
Where does stocks-llm's data on LCID come from?
Fundamentals and prices come from market data, as of 2026-08-24; company filings and profile facts come from SEC EDGAR. All figures are delayed daily-close data shown with their as-of date — informational only, not financial advice.
Fundamentals: market data, as of 2026-08-24. Filings: SEC EDGAR. Prices are delayed daily-close data.
Last updated 2026-08-21.
Informational only — NOT financial advice. All figures are delayed daily-close data from SEC EDGAR & market data, shown with their as-of date.