Leidos (LDOS)
Industrials · defense and government technology services · NYSE
Leidos is a mission-focused technology integrator supporting critical national security and health infrastructure through advanced digital and engineering solutions.
What Leidos does
Leidos is a technology, engineering, and science solutions company that provides services and products primarily to government and commercial customers. The company focuses on addressing complex challenges in national security, health, and infrastructure through digital modernization, mission-critical systems, and advanced technology integration.
Themes: digital transformation, national security, health IT, cybersecurity, government contracting
Fundamentals
- Price$141.39 as of 2026-08-21 close
- Market cap$17.7B as of 2026-08-21
- 1-year return-21.6% 2025-08-21 close $180.44 → 2026-08-21 close $141.39
- P/E12.89 as of 2026-08-24
- Net margin+7.8% as of 2026-08-24
- Gross margin+17.8% as of 2026-08-24
- ROE+27.4% as of 2026-08-24
- Debt / equity1.14 as of 2026-08-24
- Revenue growth (YoY)+3.4% as of 2026-08-24
- Revenue CAGR (3y)+4.5% SEC XBRL
- Beta0.58 as of 2026-08-24
- Last reported earnings2026-08-04 SEC EDGAR Form 8-K (Item 2.02)
Dividend: yield +1.4%; at least 2 years of non-decreasing per-share dividends (SEC XBRL) — we do not hold the year before it, so the real streak may be longer.
How LDOS compares in its sector
- price-to-earnings ratiobottom 10% 357 covered Industrials peers, as of 2026-08-24
- net profit marginmiddle range 457 covered Industrials peers, as of 2026-08-24
- operating marginmiddle range 457 covered Industrials peers, as of 2026-08-24
- gross marginbottom 25% 455 covered Industrials peers, as of 2026-08-24
- return on equitytop 25% 460 covered Industrials peers, as of 2026-08-24
- 3-year revenue CAGRmiddle range 426 covered Industrials peers
- indicated dividend yieldmiddle range 267 covered Industrials peers, as of 2026-08-24
- free cash flow (absolute dollars, latest fiscal year)top 10% 414 covered Industrials peers, as of FY2026
Position among covered Industrials companies that report each metric (minimum 5 peers). A relative position within our covered catalog — not a valuation, quality, or investment judgment. A higher percentile is simply a higher value (for P/E, more expensive on earnings — never "better"). Informational only.
Top 10 scores & list membership
LDOS is not currently in any published Top 10 list. Its scores are below.
Long-term score
43.9 #710 of 987 scored · #132 of 197 in Industrials
Valuation 69th (price to earnings 13.2, price to book 3.4) and profitability 56th (return on equity 27.4%, operating margin 11.4%); weakest is capital return (21st, consecutive years of dividend increases 2 years).
Short-term score
53.3 #582 of 1,704 scored · #90 of 283 in Industrials
Trend 71st: a strong uptrend, with buyers in control; momentum 68th: MACD momentum is positive; weakest is setup 26th: no Elliott-wave labelling currently fits its swings.
Scores as of 21 Aug 2026. Each bar is a percentile: how this company ranked against every company the score ranked, 0–100. A list is a published formula and its output, not a recommendation. Method version 2.
Dividend coverage (FY2026)
Covered by reported results. In FY2026, LDOS's dividend was covered by reported results (earnings payout 15%, free-cash-flow payout 13%). This describes past coverage, not a forecast.
- Earnings payout15% dividends / net income
- Free-cash-flow payout13% dividends / (operating cash flow − capex)
Coverage derived from reported SEC EDGAR XBRL figures for FY2026 (dividends paid vs. net income and free cash flow, same fiscal year). This describes PAST coverage for one fiscal year — it does not predict whether a dividend will be maintained, raised, or cut, and a one-year payout ratio can be distorted by non-recurring items. Informational only — not financial advice.
How Leidos looks technically
Leidos (LDOS) is trading 10.0% below its 200-day average, the long-term trend line — a long-term downtrend. Its 50-day average crossed below its 200-day average about 100 trading days ago — a "death cross", a bearish long-term signal. A strong uptrend is in place — ADX, a 0–100 trend-strength gauge, is 46, with buyers in control. Momentum is neutral — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 67, neither overbought (above 70) nor oversold (below 30). It made a new 20-day high about 3 trading days ago. It is 31.3% below its highest point of the past year.
Trend
8
| Distance from the 200-day | it is trading 10.0% below its 200-day average, the long-term trend line — a long-term downtrend | -10.0% |
|---|---|---|
| 50-day moving average | its average price over the last 50 trading days — a short-term trend line — is $117.82 | $117.82 |
| 200-day moving average | its average price over the last 200 trading days — the long-term trend line — is $157.10 | $157.10 |
| Swing structure | its recent peaks and dips disagree — one of them is rising while the other is not, so there is no clean up or down pattern in the swings | mixed — one of the two is not confirming |
| Last swing turn | its last significant turn was a swing low 31 calendar days ago — the swings before that are what the structure reading is measured on | 31 sessions |
| Wave structure | its recent swings can be read as a completed five-part downward sequence — the pattern Elliott-wave chartists call an impulse — which on that reading would now be due a pullback rather than more of the same; the labelling fails if price closes below 103.9. It is the only labelling that fits, though not with textbook proportions, and it describes the swings already printed, not what comes next. | possible five-wave downward sequence, complete (atypical proportions) |
| Since the 50/200 cross | its 50-day average crossed below its 200-day average about 100 trading days ago — a "death cross", a bearish long-term signal | 100 sessions |
| Trend strength (14-day ADX) | a strong uptrend is in place — ADX, a 0–100 trend-strength gauge, is 46, with buyers in control | 46.4 |
Momentum
3
| 14-day RSI | momentum is neutral — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 67, neither overbought (above 70) nor oversold (below 30) | 66.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Position in its 14-day range | it is trading in the upper half of its 14-day range ($124.96 to $147.32) — its "stochastic" reading is 73 out of 100, where 0 would mean closing exactly at the 14-session low and 100 exactly at the high. This measures WHERE the price sits inside its recent range, which is a different question from the RSI beside it: RSI is a momentum gauge, measuring how FAST the price has been moving, so a stock can drift quietly to the bottom of its range with an ordinary RSI, or fall sharply and still sit in the middle. It has been slipping within that range over the last few sessions. | 73.5 |
| Since the MACD crossed zero | MACD, a trend-momentum gauge, is in positive territory (momentum leaning bullish) | 36 sessions |
Range
12
| 52-week high | its highest closing price over the past year (about 252 trading days) was $205.77 | $205.77 |
|---|---|---|
| From the 52-week high | it is 31.3% below its 52-week high (its highest price of the past year) | -31.3% |
| Above the 52-week low | it is 43.0% above its 52-week low (its lowest price of the past year) | +43.0% |
| Below the 52-week high | it is 31.3% below its highest point of the past year | 31.3% |
| Since a 20-day breakout | it made a new 20-day high about 3 trading days ago | 3 sessions |
| Since a 55-day breakout | it made a new 55-day high about 3 trading days ago | 3 sessions |
| All-time high | its highest closing price on record is $205.77 (set on 2025-11-04) | $205.77 |
| Given back of the 52-week move | over the past year its closes ranged ($100.00 to $199.55), and it has recovered roughly a third of its fall from last year’s high — 42% of it. Chart-watchers call 61.8%-65% given back the "golden pocket" — for this company that is $161.52 to $164.71. It is watched widely enough that orders cluster there, which is the honest reason it matters; it is not a forecast. | 41.6% |
| From the all-time high | it is 31.3% below its all-time high | -31.3% |
| Nearest price level | it is trading 1.5% below a resistance level at $143.52 — a price it turned at six times since 2024-12-20, most recently on 2025-06-11. Since 2024-08-21 it has 2 such levels below the current price and 10 above. Levels like these describe where the price has reversed or paused before; they are not a forecast of where it will go. | +1.5% |
| All-time low | its lowest closing price on record is $25.44 (set on 2012-05-23) | $25.44 |
| Above the all-time low | it is 455.7% above its all-time low | +455.7% |
Volatility
5
| Band width vs its own 6 months | day-to-day price swings are unusually wide versus its own recent history (wider than about 89% of the past ~6 months) | 89th percentile |
|---|---|---|
| Typical daily range | in a typical session it travels about $4.42 between its high and its low — about 3.1% of its price. That is its "average true range" over the last 14 sessions, which also counts the distance from the previous close, so a day that opens well away from yesterday counts as the large move it was | $4.42 |
| Bollinger bands (20-day, ±2σ) | most of its recent trading has stayed between about $108.84 and $155.79 — the "Bollinger bands", a range drawn two standard deviations either side of its 20-day average price, which widens when the stock gets more volatile and narrows when it settles | $108.84 – $132.32 – $155.79 |
| Typical daily range (% of price) | its price moves about 3.1% in a typical session — about typical for the companies we cover. This is the average gap between a session's high and low over the last 14 sessions, counting overnight moves, expressed against the current price so it can be compared with companies trading at any price | 3.1% |
| Stretch from the 200-day average | it is trading 3.6 daily ranges below its 200-day average price (10.0% below it in plain percentage terms) — a way of asking how far it has stretched from its own average in units of how far it normally moves in a day, so a calm company and a jumpy one can be compared on the same scale | 3.6 daily ranges below its 200-day average |
Volume
1
| Volume vs its 30-day average | trading volume is about normal versus its 30-day average | 0.66× |
|---|
Analyst
2
| Change in the average price target | analysts have raised their average price target by 2.0% since the prior reading | +2.0% |
|---|---|---|
| Change in the consensus rating | the analyst consensus rating is unchanged since the prior reading | unchanged |
Candlestick patterns
1
| Since a doji | 3 sessions ago it opened and closed at almost the same price after trading through a wider range — a "doji", the classic picture of buyers and sellers finishing the session level | 3 sessions ago |
|---|
Price gaps
3
| Gap at the open | it opened on 2026-08-21 0.5% above the previous session's close — an overnight gap, the part of the move that happened while the market was shut, and traded back through that level before the close | +0.5% |
|---|---|---|
| Open gap | it gapped 2.2% above the previous close 11 sessions ago and has not traded back through the level it left behind at 126.85 — an "unfilled gap", which describes a price range no trade has since crossed and is not a forecast that it will be crossed | +2.2% |
| Gap filled | a 2.3% gap down opened on 2026-07-21 has been "filled" 22 sessions ago — price traded back through the level the gap left behind, and it took 1 session to close | 22 sessions ago |
Price streaks
1
| Closing streak | it closed higher in its latest session, after a session that did not close higher — a single up day rather than a run | 1 session up |
|---|
Relative strength
4
| vs market, 1 month | over the past 1 month this stock beat the market by 32.4 percentage points (the stock gained 34.8% while the market gained 2.3%) | +32.4% |
|---|---|---|
| vs market, 3 months | over the past 3 months this stock beat the market by 11.8 percentage points (the stock gained 14.9% while the market gained 3.1%) | +11.8% |
| vs market, 6 months | over the past 6 months this stock lagged the market by 29.6 percentage points (the stock lost 18.5% while the market gained 11.1%) | -29.6% |
| vs market, 12 months | over the past 12 months this stock lagged the market by 42.1 percentage points (the stock lost 21.6% while the market gained 20.5%) | -42.1% |
Signal agreement
2
| Bullish technical signals | 4 of the 9 technical signals we can compute for it are currently in a bullish state: a strong uptrend, with buyers in control, a fresh 20-day high, MACD momentum is positive, trading above the Ichimoku cloud — these describe past price behaviour, not a forecast | 4 of 9 |
|---|---|---|
| Bearish technical signals | 3 of the 9 technical signals we can compute for it are currently in a bearish state: a "death cross" — its 50-day average is below its 200-day, trading below its 200-day average, lagging the market over 6 months — these describe past price behaviour, not a forecast | 3 of 9 |
Trend (Ichimoku cloud)
1
| Vs the Ichimoku cloud | trading 12% above the Ichimoku cloud — a band drawn from where its own highs and lows sat up to 2026-07-16 and projected forward over today's price, the side traders read as an established uptrend, with the band below acting as the level that would have to give way. The band itself is thick, spanning 11.2% of the share price, which is taken to mean a barrier that has held for a while and takes effort to cross. | +11.9% |
|---|
Volume-weighted price
2
| Vs this year’s average price paid | the price is sitting right on the average price paid so far this year, so the typical buyer over that stretch is roughly break-even. That average is $141.72 — a volume-weighted average of daily closes over 157 sessions, not a true tick-by-tick VWAP. | -0.2% |
|---|---|---|
| Vs the average paid since it last reported | the price is 2% above the average price paid since it last reported on 2026-08-04 (its 10-Q), so the typical buyer over that stretch is showing a gain. That average is $138.03 — a volume-weighted average of daily closes over 14 sessions, not a true tick-by-tick VWAP. | +2.4% |
Price levels it has turned at before
LDOS last closed at $141.39 on 2026-08-21. Since 2024-08-21 it has turned at 2 prices below its last close and 10 above; the 2 nearest below and the 3 nearest above are listed, nearest first.
| Level | Side | Distance | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| $143.52 | Resistance | 1.5% above the last close | turned there six times · 2024-12-20 to 2025-06-11 |
| $137.23 | Support | 2.9% below the last close | turned there twice · 2025-01-28 to 2025-04-21 |
| $149.75 | Resistance | 5.9% above the last close | turned there three times · 2024-09-11 to 2026-04-10 |
| $153.32 | Resistance | 8.4% above the last close | turned there twice · 2026-03-30 to 2026-05-05 |
| $121.36 | Support | 14.2% below the last close | turned there twice · 2026-05-13 to 2026-05-21 |
A level is a price this company reversed or paused at more than once — they describe past behaviour, not a forecast of where the price will go.
Wave structure
Its recent swings can be read as a five-part downward sequence — what Elliott-wave chartists call an impulse — now complete.
This labelling fails — stops being a possible reading at all — if it closes below $103.90.
It is the only labelling that fits these swings, though its proportions are not the textbook ones. It was chosen from 4 labellings that survived the rules, counting shorter readings of the same bars.
This labelling was already in place when we began recording count changes on 2026-08-13, so how long it has stood is not something we can say yet.
Read from daily closes as of 2026-08-21.
An Elliott-wave count describes the swings already printed and the level that would disprove it. It is not a forecast, a target, or advice.
Screens: Trading below the 200-day moving average · Pulled back from the 12-month high · Broke out to a new 20-day high · in a strong, established uptrend (ADX) · Analyst price target recently RAISED · lagging the market | Learn: moving average · golden cross · adx · rsi · breakout · fifty two week high low
Based on daily closing prices as of 2026-08-21. Describes past price behavior only — informational, not financial advice.
Analyst consensus
- Consensus ratingBuy (2.35 mean, 1=Strong Buy…5=Strong Sell) — 15 analysts
- Mean price target$156.60 range $125.00 – $225.00; median $160.00
Analyst estimates, as of 2026-08-22. These are third-party analyst opinions and price targets, aggregated — not a recommendation, prediction, or advice from stocks-llm. Informational only.
Analyst EPS estimate for LDOS
- Consensus EPS estimate$3.05 next reporting period, as of 2026-08-22
Change over time is not available yet: it needs two readings of the same reporting period at least 30 days apart, and we have been recording these estimates since 2026-08-04. An estimate for a DIFFERENT quarter is not a revision, so a reading from before the last report is never compared with one after it.
The consensus estimate for the next reporting period, and how it has moved between readings of that SAME period. A change is measured only between readings estimating one period — when a company reports, the consensus moves to the next quarter and the two numbers are not comparable. Informational only, not a forecast and not advice.
Key risks (from latest filing)
["dependence on government contracts and funding levels","integration risks associated with acquisitions","fluctuations in interest expense and debt levels"]
What changed in the latest 10-Q
AI-assisted comparison of LDOS's 10-Q filed 2026-05-05 against the prior one filed 2025-11-04.
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
- Added:
- Newer filing (2026-05-05) states Leidos has 50,000 global employees; older filing (2025-11-04) stated 47,000
- Newer filing introduces four reportable segments: Intelligence & Digital, Health, Homeland and Defense (with fiscal 2026 realignment); older filing had different segment structure (National Security & Digital, Health & Civil)
- Newer filing references 'U.S. Department of War (DoW)'; older filing referenced 'U.S. Department of Defense (DoD)'
- Newer filing states segments were 'recast to reflect the current reportable segment structure'
- Newer filing describes five strategic growth pillars: space and maritime; energy infrastructure; digital modernization and cyber; mission software; and managed health services
- Newer filing mentions April 30, 2026 legislation by Congress to fund non-immigration agencies within Department of Homeland Security ending government shutdown
- Newer filing reports three months ended April 3, 2026 vs April 4, 2025; older filing reported three months ended October 3, 2025 vs September 27, 2024 (and nine months data)
- Newer filing shows Intelligence & Digital segment with $1,513M revenues and $146M operating income; older National Security & Digital had $2,015M revenues and $191M operating income
- Newer filing shows Health segment with $1,188M revenues and $284M operating income; older Health & Civil had $1,301M revenues and $328M operating income
- Newer filing introduces Homeland segment ($816M revenues, $33M operating income) and Defense segment (data truncated)
- Newer filing mentions acquisition of Kudu Dynamics contributing $22M to Intelligence & Digital revenues
- Newer filing mentions acquisition of Entrust contributing $11M to Homeland revenues and $25M increase in acquisition/integration/restructuring costs
- Newer filing discusses 'net write-ups' and 'net write-downs' on certain programs in segment analyses
- Removed:
- Older filing described seven technical core capabilities: trusted mission artificial intelligence, cyber operations, digital modernization, mission software systems, integrated systems, mission operations, and rapid prototyping and manufacturing (not in newer filing)
- Older filing referenced National Aeronautics and Space Administration as customer (not mentioned in newer filing excerpt)
- Older filing included nine months ended data; newer filing appears to show only three months ended data
- Older filing described October 1, 2025 government shutdown and ongoing negotiations; newer filing references resolved April 30, 2026 legislation
- Reworded:
- Changed from 'domain-specific capabilities, technologies and insights' and 'seven technical core capabilities' approach to 'five pillars' strategic growth framework
- Changed from 'Department of Defense' to 'Department of War'
- Segment structure completely reorganized from 'National Security & Digital' and 'Health & Civil' to 'Intelligence & Digital', 'Health', 'Homeland', and 'Defense'
- Operating margin changed from 12.0% to 11.5% for consolidated three-month comparison
- Notes:
- Newer filing text appears truncated at Defense segment section; full comparison of Defense segment not possible
- Different fiscal periods compared (April 2026 vs October 2025 filings) make some year-over-year comparisons span different calendar periods
- Segment restatement means prior year data has been recast; direct segment-to-segment comparisons between filings require caution
Risk Factors
- Added:
- Newer filing includes financial data for Q2 2026 (ended April 3, 2026) compared to older filing's Q3 2025 (ended October 3, 2025)
- Newer filing shows acquisition of a business for $2,338 million in investing activities for Q2 2026
- Newer filing reports loss on pension plan settlement of $23 million in Q2 2026
- Newer filing shows net proceeds from commercial paper of $300 million in financing activities
- Newer filing shows divestiture of a business generating $4 million in Q2 2026
- Newer filing reports Goodwill increased to $8,094 million at April 3, 2026 from $6,342 million at January 2, 2026
- Newer filing reports Intangible assets increased to $993 million at April 3, 2026 from $458 million at January 2, 2026
- Newer filing reports short-term debt increased to $320 million at April 3, 2026 from $20 million at January 2, 2026
- Newer filing shows long-term debt increased to $6,014 million at April 3, 2026 from $4,628 million at January 2, 2026
- Removed:
- Older filing included nine months ended data; newer filing presents only three months ended
- Older filing included asset impairment charges of $4 million and $6 million for three months; newer filing does not show this line item in the three months ended statement
- Older filing showed nine-month comprehensive income statements comparing October 3, 2025 and September 27, 2024; newer filing only shows three months ended
- Reworded:
- Older filing listed 'Current portion of long-term debt' as $19 million; newer filing lists 'Short-term debt and current portion of long-term debt' as $320 million, reflecting different presentation due to recent debt issuance
- Older filing's statements of equity showed quarterly progression through nine months; newer filing shows only year-to-date progression for first quarter
- Notes:
- The filings cover different fiscal periods (Q2 2026 ended April 3, 2026 versus Q3 2025 ended October 3, 2025), making direct comparison of operating results less meaningful
- The significant increase in goodwill and intangible assets reflects the $2.338 billion acquisition completed in Q2 2026, which is a material transaction not comparable in the older period
- Risk Factors sections were truncated in both provided texts and could not be fully compared
AI-assisted comparison of two SEC filing sections. It describes wording and theme changes only, makes no materiality, legal, or investment judgement, and is not financial advice. Informational only — not financial advice.
Insider activity (SEC Form 4)
No open-market insider purchases or sales recorded in the last 90 days.
- Last 180 days0 buys · 1 sell ($197005) — 1 selling insider
Most recent open-market transaction: 2026-05-07. As of 2026-08-24.
View full insider trading history → View SEC Form 3/4/5 filingsAsk about LDOS's insider activity →
Only open-market purchases (SEC code P) and sales (code S) are counted here. Option exercises, vesting/awards, gifts, and shares withheld for taxes are excluded — they are compensation or mechanical, not open-market conviction. Sales may be planned and non-discretionary (e.g. a Rule 10b5-1 plan) and are not necessarily bearish; open-market buying is not a recommendation to buy. Informational only — not financial advice.
Congressional trading disclosures
U.S. House members publicly disclose their own, their spouse's, and dependent children's stock transactions under the STOCK Act. We hold 2 matched disclosures for LDOS from U.S. House Clerk Periodic Transaction Report filings.
Congressional trading disclosures →Institutional ownership (13F)
6 institutional 13F filers reported holding LDOS as of 2026-03-31 (quarter-end position, filed within 45 days).
- Distinct 13F filers 6
- Reported shares held 18,410,942
- Reported value $2,863,269,660
reported quarterly holdings change (2025-12-31 → 2026-03-31): 1 new, 2 increased, 3 decreased, 0 exited. Change counts cover only managers that filed 13F reports in BOTH quarters, derived between two quarter-end snapshots — not same-day trades; a single manager is never said to have "bought" or "sold".
Institutional holdings are quarter-end long positions reported on SEC Form 13F-HR, filed up to 45 days after the quarter ends — they are delayed, are not real-time trades, exclude short positions and most non-US securities, and are not investment advice. Any increase/decrease is a reported change between two quarterly snapshots, not a same-day purchase or sale. These are quarter-end snapshots from the 13F filings on SEC EDGAR, filed within 45 days — not real-time, and any change is a difference between two quarterly reports, not a same-day trade. Informational only — not financial advice.
Short interest (FINRA)
LDOS had 5,200,289 shares of reported short interest as of the 2026-07-31 FINRA settlement date (delayed, bi-monthly; not real-time).
LDOS had 4.14% of its shares outstanding sold short as of the 2026-07-31 FINRA settlement date (percent of FLOAT would be higher — float is not disclosed in the source). FINRA reported 3.67 days to cover at the same settlement.
- Reported short interest (shares) 5,200,289
- Short interest (% of shares outstanding) 4.14%
- Prior settlement (shares) 6,413,623
- Reported change -18.92%
- Days to cover (reported) 3.67
Reported to FINRA as of the 2026-07-31 settlement date. Short interest is reported to FINRA and published on a delayed, bi-monthly schedule (as of a settlement date, disseminated roughly eight business days later) — it is NOT real-time, does not cover every venue or all US trading, and is not a short-squeeze prediction or investment advice. Days-to-cover is the value FINRA reports; percent of float is not shown because the source file carries no share-count denominator — where a percent appears it is of shares OUTSTANDING, the larger base, and is therefore a floor on percent of float. Informational only — not financial advice.
Competitors & peers
- General Dynamics (GD)
- Northrop Grumman (NOC)
- Lockheed Martin (LMT)
- Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH)
- CACI International (CACI)
- Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC)
AI-enriched competitor set. Linked names are companies covered by stocks-llm; other named peers are shown for reference only.
Compare LDOS vs…
Leidos is found in…
Frequently asked questions
What does Leidos (LDOS) do?
Leidos is a technology, engineering, and science solutions company that provides services and products primarily to government and commercial customers. The company focuses on addressing complex challenges in national security, health, and infrastructure through digital modernization, mission-critical systems, and advanced technology integration.
What sector is Leidos (LDOS) in?
Leidos (LDOS) is classified in the Industrials sector. Its industry is defense and government technology services. It trades on NYSE.
Does LDOS pay a dividend?
Yes — Leidos (LDOS) pays a dividend, with an indicated yield of about 1.42% and at least 2 years of non-decreasing per-share dividends (SEC EDGAR XBRL) — we do not hold the year before it, so the real streak may be longer (market data, as of 2026-08-24). Informational only — not financial advice.
Who are Leidos's (LDOS) competitors?
Notable peers of Leidos (LDOS) include General Dynamics, Northrop Grumman, Lockheed Martin, Booz Allen Hamilton and CACI International. This peer set is informational only — not financial advice.
Has there been recent Congressional stock trading in LDOS?
Yes — we hold 2 matched STOCK Act disclosures for LDOS from U.S. House Clerk Periodic Transaction Report filings. These are legally-required disclosures (often filed 30–45 days after the trade), may belong to a U.S. House member, their spouse, or a dependent child, and are not an indicator of company performance or investment advice.
Is Leidos (LDOS) overbought or oversold right now?
Leidos (LDOS) is currently neither overbought nor oversold — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 67, in the neutral middle (as of 2026-08-21). RSI describes recent price momentum, not a forecast — informational only, not financial advice.
Where does stocks-llm's data on LDOS come from?
Fundamentals and prices come from market data, as of 2026-08-24; company filings and profile facts come from SEC EDGAR. All figures are delayed daily-close data shown with their as-of date — informational only, not financial advice.
Fundamentals: market data, as of 2026-08-24. Filings: SEC EDGAR. Prices are delayed daily-close data.
Last updated 2026-08-21.
Informational only — NOT financial advice. All figures are delayed daily-close data from SEC EDGAR & market data, shown with their as-of date.