OXFORD INDUSTRIES INC (OXM)
Consumer Discretionary · Apparel Retail and Lifestyle Brands · NYSE
A leading portfolio of lifestyle apparel brands—Tommy Bahama, Lilly Pulitzer, Johnny Was, and others—that designs and distributes products directly to consumers via stores, e-commerce, and food & beverage concepts.
What OXFORD INDUSTRIES INC does
Oxford Industries designs, sources, markets and distributes products under a portfolio of lifestyle brands including Tommy Bahama (56% of sales), Lilly Pulitzer, Johnny Was, Southern Tide, TBBC, Duck Head and Jack Rogers. The company operates 82% of its consolidated net sales through direct-to-consumer channels including brand-specific full-price retail stores, e-commerce websites, outlet stores, and Tommy Bahama food and beverage operations, with the remaining 18% from wholesale distribution through specialty stores, department stores, and multi-branded e-commerce retailers. Tommy Bahama targets consumers over 45 with household incomes exceeding $150,000, offering men's and women's sportswear and resort lifestyle products.
Themes: lifestyle branding, direct-to-consumer (DTC), experiential retail, apparel and fashion, omnichannel commerce
Fundamentals
- Price$36.20 as of 2026-08-21 close
- Market cap$540M as of 2026-08-21
- 1-year return-18.8% 2025-08-21 close $44.57 → 2026-08-21 close $36.20
- P/En/a negative earnings
- Net margin-2.6% as of 2026-08-24
- Gross margin+61.3% as of 2026-08-24
- ROE-7.2% as of 2026-08-24
- Debt / equity0.27 as of 2026-08-24
- Revenue growth (YoY)-2.3% as of 2026-08-24
- Revenue CAGR (3y)+1.5% SEC XBRL
- Beta1.10 as of 2026-08-24
- Last reported earnings2026-06-10 SEC EDGAR Form 8-K (Item 2.02)
Dividend: yield +2.8%; at least 5 years of non-decreasing per-share dividends (SEC XBRL) — we do not hold the year before it, so the real streak may be longer.
How OXM compares in its sector
- net profit marginbottom 25% 334 covered Consumer Discretionary peers, as of 2026-08-24
- operating marginbottom 25% 334 covered Consumer Discretionary peers, as of 2026-08-24
- gross margintop 25% 331 covered Consumer Discretionary peers, as of 2026-08-24
- return on equitybottom 25% 334 covered Consumer Discretionary peers, as of 2026-08-24
- 3-year revenue CAGRmiddle range 325 covered Consumer Discretionary peers
- indicated dividend yieldmiddle range 162 covered Consumer Discretionary peers, as of 2026-08-24
- free cash flow (absolute dollars, latest fiscal year)bottom 25% 311 covered Consumer Discretionary peers, as of FY2026
Position among covered Consumer Discretionary companies that report each metric (minimum 5 peers). A relative position within our covered catalog — not a valuation, quality, or investment judgment. A higher percentile is simply a higher value (for P/E, more expensive on earnings — never "better"). Informational only.
Dividend coverage (FY2026)
Exceeded at least one reported measure. In FY2026, OXM's dividend exceeded at least one reported measure of what it earned or generated (free-cash-flow payout 373%). A payout above 100% in one year is not necessarily unsustainable, but it is not fully covered by that measure.
- Earnings payoutnot assessable earnings were not positive that year
- Free-cash-flow payout373% dividends / (operating cash flow − capex)
Coverage derived from reported SEC EDGAR XBRL figures for FY2026 (dividends paid vs. net income and free cash flow, same fiscal year). This describes PAST coverage for one fiscal year — it does not predict whether a dividend will be maintained, raised, or cut, and a one-year payout ratio can be distorted by non-recurring items. Informational only — not financial advice.
How OXFORD INDUSTRIES INC looks technically
OXFORD INDUSTRIES INC (OXM) is trading 6.1% below its 200-day average, the long-term trend line — a long-term downtrend. Its 50-day average crossed below its 200-day average about 7 trading days ago — a "death cross", a bearish long-term signal. There is no clear trend right now — the price is choppy (ADX, a 0–100 trend-strength gauge, is 13, below the 25 that marks a real trend). Momentum is neutral — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 45, neither overbought (above 70) nor oversold (below 30). It made a new 20-day low about 2 trading days ago. It is 29.9% below its highest point of the past year.
Trend
7
| Distance from the 200-day | it is trading 6.1% below its 200-day average, the long-term trend line — a long-term downtrend | -6.1% |
|---|---|---|
| 50-day moving average | its average price over the last 50 trading days — a short-term trend line — is $37.38 | $37.38 |
| 200-day moving average | its average price over the last 200 trading days — the long-term trend line — is $38.55 | $38.55 |
| Swing structure | each recent peak has been higher than the one before it and each dip has been shallower — the pattern chart-watchers call an uptrend, which describes where price has already been and not where it goes next | higher highs and higher lows |
| Last swing turn | its last significant turn was a swing low 22 calendar days ago — the swings before that are what the structure reading is measured on | 22 sessions |
| Since the 50/200 cross | its 50-day average crossed below its 200-day average about 7 trading days ago — a "death cross", a bearish long-term signal | 7 sessions |
| Trend strength (14-day ADX) | there is no clear trend right now — the price is choppy (ADX, a 0–100 trend-strength gauge, is 13, below the 25 that marks a real trend) | 12.9 |
Momentum
3
| 14-day RSI | momentum is neutral — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 45, neither overbought (above 70) nor oversold (below 30) | 45.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Position in its 14-day range | it is trading in the lower half of its 14-day range ($33.99 to $39.68) — its "stochastic" reading is 39 out of 100, where 0 would mean closing exactly at the 14-session low and 100 exactly at the high. This measures WHERE the price sits inside its recent range, which is a different question from the RSI beside it: RSI is a momentum gauge, measuring how FAST the price has been moving, so a stock can drift quietly to the bottom of its range with an ordinary RSI, or fall sharply and still sit in the middle. It has been climbing within that range over the last few sessions. | 38.8 |
| Since the MACD crossed zero | MACD, a trend-momentum gauge, is in negative territory (momentum leaning bearish) | 15 sessions |
Range
12
| 52-week high | its highest closing price over the past year (about 252 trading days) was $51.61 | $51.61 |
|---|---|---|
| From the 52-week high | it is 29.9% below its 52-week high (its highest price of the past year) | -29.9% |
| Above the 52-week low | it is 18.4% above its 52-week low (its lowest price of the past year) | +18.4% |
| Below the 52-week high | it is 29.9% below its highest point of the past year | 29.9% |
| Since a 20-day breakout | it made a new 20-day low about 2 trading days ago | 2 sessions |
| Since a 55-day breakout | it made a new 55-day low about 2 trading days ago | 2 sessions |
| All-time high | its highest closing price on record is $123.37 (set on 2023-02-03) | $123.37 |
| Given back of the 52-week move | over the past year its closes ranged ($31.74 to $51.58), and it has recovered roughly a quarter of its fall from last year’s high — 22% of it. Chart-watchers call 61.8%-65% given back the "golden pocket" — for this company that is $44.00 to $44.64. It is watched widely enough that orders cluster there, which is the honest reason it matters; it is not a forecast. | 22.5% |
| From the all-time high | it is 70.7% below its all-time high | -70.7% |
| Nearest price level | it is trading 1.2% below a resistance level at $36.63 — a price it turned at five times since 2025-06-25, most recently on 2026-07-30. Since 2024-08-21 it has 3 such levels below the current price and 12 above. Levels like these describe where the price has reversed or paused before; they are not a forecast of where it will go. | +1.2% |
| All-time low | its lowest closing price on record is $3.14 (set on 2009-03-09) | $3.14 |
| Above the all-time low | it is 1052.9% above its all-time low | +1,053% |
Volatility
5
| Band width vs its own 6 months | day-to-day price swings are about average versus its own recent 6-month history | 34th percentile |
|---|---|---|
| Typical daily range | in a typical session it travels about $1.61 between its high and its low — about 4.4% of its price. That is its "average true range" over the last 14 sessions, which also counts the distance from the previous close, so a day that opens well away from yesterday counts as the large move it was | $1.61 |
| Bollinger bands (20-day, ±2σ) | most of its recent trading has stayed between about $34.08 and $40.62 — the "Bollinger bands", a range drawn two standard deviations either side of its 20-day average price, which widens when the stock gets more volatile and narrows when it settles | $34.08 – $37.35 – $40.62 |
| Typical daily range (% of price) | its price moves about 4.4% in a typical session — about typical for the companies we cover. This is the average gap between a session's high and low over the last 14 sessions, counting overnight moves, expressed against the current price so it can be compared with companies trading at any price | 4.4% |
| Stretch from the 200-day average | it is trading 1.5 daily ranges below its 200-day average price (6.1% below it in plain percentage terms) — a way of asking how far it has stretched from its own average in units of how far it normally moves in a day, so a calm company and a jumpy one can be compared on the same scale | 1.5 daily ranges below its 200-day average |
Volume
1
| Volume vs its 30-day average | trading volume is about normal versus its 30-day average | 0.72× |
|---|
Analyst
2
| Change in the average price target | analysts' average price target is unchanged from the prior reading | 0.0% |
|---|---|---|
| Change in the consensus rating | not available for this company yet | n/a |
Candlestick patterns
2
| Since a doji | 4 sessions ago it opened and closed at almost the same price after trading through a wider range — a "doji", the classic picture of buyers and sellers finishing the session level | 4 sessions ago |
|---|---|---|
| Since a hammer | 4 sessions ago, after a stretch of decline, it sold off hard during the session and then closed back near its high — a "hammer", the long lower wick showing the drop was bought back before the close | 4 sessions ago |
Price gaps
3
| Gap at the open | it opened on 2026-08-21 0.7% above the previous session's close — an overnight gap, the part of the move that happened while the market was shut, and had not traded back through that level by the close | +0.7% |
|---|---|---|
| Open gap | it gapped 13.4% below the previous close 48 sessions ago and has not traded back through the level it left behind at 44.52 — an "unfilled gap", which describes a price range no trade has since crossed and is not a forecast that it will be crossed | -13.4% |
| Gap filled | a 2.2% gap up opened on 2026-08-03 has been "filled" 14 sessions ago — price traded back through the level the gap left behind, and it closed again during the very session that opened it | 14 sessions ago |
Price streaks
1
| Closing streak | it closed higher in its latest session, after a session that did not close higher — a single up day rather than a run | 1 session up |
|---|
Relative strength
4
| vs market, 1 month | over the past 1 month this stock lagged the market by 13.4 percentage points (the stock lost 11.1% while the market gained 2.3%) | -13.4% |
|---|---|---|
| vs market, 3 months | over the past 3 months this stock lagged the market by 10.3 percentage points (the stock lost 7.3% while the market gained 3.1%) | -10.3% |
| vs market, 6 months | over the past 6 months this stock lagged the market by 23.5 percentage points (the stock lost 12.4% while the market gained 11.1%) | -23.5% |
| vs market, 12 months | over the past 12 months this stock lagged the market by 39.3 percentage points (the stock lost 18.8% while the market gained 20.5%) | -39.3% |
Signal agreement
2
| Bullish technical signals | 0 of the 9 technical signals we can compute for it are currently in a bullish state — these describe past price behaviour, not a forecast | 0 of 9 |
|---|---|---|
| Bearish technical signals | 6 of the 9 technical signals we can compute for it are currently in a bearish state: a "death cross" — its 50-day average is below its 200-day, trading below its 200-day average, a fresh 20-day low, MACD momentum is negative, lagging the market over 6 months, trading below the Ichimoku cloud — these describe past price behaviour, not a forecast | 6 of 9 |
Trend (Ichimoku cloud)
1
| Vs the Ichimoku cloud | trading 6.6% below the Ichimoku cloud — a band drawn from where its own highs and lows sat up to 2026-07-16 and projected forward over today's price, the side traders read as an established downtrend, with the band above acting as the level that would have to be cleared. The band itself is thick, spanning 8.3% of the share price, which is taken to mean a barrier that has held for a while and takes effort to cross. | -6.6% |
|---|
Volume-weighted price
2
| Vs this year’s average price paid | the price is 6% below the average price paid so far this year, so the typical buyer over that stretch is under water. That average is $38.52 — a volume-weighted average of daily closes over 157 sessions, not a true tick-by-tick VWAP. | -6.0% |
|---|---|---|
| Vs the average paid since it last reported | the price is 2% below the average price paid since it last reported on 2026-06-10 (its 8-K), so the typical buyer over that stretch is under water. That average is $37.07 — a volume-weighted average of daily closes over 49 sessions, not a true tick-by-tick VWAP. | -2.4% |
Price levels it has turned at before
OXM last closed at $36.20 on 2026-08-21. Since 2024-08-21 it has turned at 3 prices below its last close and 12 above; the 3 nearest below and the 3 nearest above are listed, nearest first.
| Level | Side | Distance | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| $36.63 | Resistance | 1.2% above the last close | turned there five times · 2025-06-25 to 2026-07-30 |
| $35.51 | Support | 1.9% below the last close | turned there three times · 2025-10-10 to 2026-01-29 |
| $33.97 | Support | 6.2% below the last close | turned there twice · 2026-01-12 to 2026-06-29 |
| $39.40 | Resistance | 8.8% above the last close | turned there three times · 2025-09-10 to 2026-06-23 |
| $31.44 | Support | 13.1% below the last close | turned there twice · 2025-11-20 to 2026-03-19 |
| $41.89 | Resistance | 15.7% above the last close | turned there four times · 2025-04-17 to 2026-02-20 |
A level is a price this company reversed or paused at more than once — they describe past behaviour, not a forecast of where the price will go.
Wave structure
No Elliott-wave labelling currently fits its swings: the recent highs and lows do not satisfy the three rules a five-wave count has to obey, so there is no count to show rather than a count we are unsure about.
Read from daily closes as of 2026-08-21.
An Elliott-wave count describes the swings already printed and the level that would disprove it. It is not a forecast, a target, or advice.
Screens: Trading below the 200-day moving average · Recent death cross (50-day crossed below 200-day) · Pulled back from the 12-month high · Broke down to a new 20-day low · trendless / choppy (low ADX) · lagging the market | Learn: moving average · golden cross · adx · rsi · breakout · fifty two week high low
Based on daily closing prices as of 2026-08-21. Describes past price behavior only — informational, not financial advice.
Analyst consensus
- Mean price target$40.00 range $36.00 – $44.00
Analyst estimates, as of 2026-08-23. These are third-party analyst opinions and price targets, aggregated — not a recommendation, prediction, or advice from stocks-llm. Informational only.
Analyst EPS estimate for OXM
- Consensus EPS estimate$1.30 next reporting period, as of 2026-08-23
Change over time is not available yet: it needs two readings of the same reporting period at least 30 days apart, and we have been recording these estimates since 2026-08-04. An estimate for a DIFFERENT quarter is not a revision, so a reading from before the last report is never compared with one after it.
The consensus estimate for the next reporting period, and how it has moved between readings of that SAME period. A change is measured only between readings estimating one period — when a company reports, the consensus moves to the next quarter and the two numbers are not comparable. Informational only, not a forecast and not advice.
Key risks (from latest filing)
["High dependency on discretionary consumer spending, which is sensitive to macroeconomic volatility and economic downturns.","Intense competition in the apparel industry and potential failure to accurately forecast fashion trends and consumer preferences.","Operational risks related to supply chain dynamics, transportation costs, and uncertainty regarding U.S. tariffs on imported goods."]
What changed in the latest 10-Q
AI-assisted comparison of OXM's 10-Q filed 2026-06-11 against the prior one filed 2025-12-11.
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
- Reworded:
- Reference updated from 'Fiscal 2024 Form 10-K' to 'Fiscal 2025 Form 10-K' (newer filing, 2026-06-11)
- Brand list reformatted: older version listed 'our Tommy Bahama, Lilly Pulitzer, Johnny Was, Southern Tide, TBBC, Duck Head and Jack Rogers lifestyle brands'; newer version lists 'our portfolio of lifestyle brands: Tommy Bahama, Lilly Pulitzer, Johnny Was, Southern Tide, TBBC, Duck Head and Jack Rogers' (newer filing, 2026-06-11)
- Direct-to-consumer percentage changed from '81%' to '82%' (newer filing, 2026-06-11)
- Wholesale percentage changed from '19%' to '18%' (newer filing, 2026-06-11)
- Fiscal year reference changed from 'Fiscal 2024' to 'Fiscal 2025' in the distribution channels paragraph (newer filing, 2026-06-11)
- Food and beverage operations description changed from 'food & beverage' to 'food and beverage' (newer filing, 2026-06-11)
- Notes:
- The two filings are from different fiscal periods (Fiscal 2025 vs. Fiscal 2024), making some updates expected and routine
Risk Factors
- Added:
- Newer filing (2026-06-11) adds specific details about February 20, 2026 Supreme Court decision invalidating tariffs under IEEPA
- Newer filing adds disclosure of $40 million IEEPA tariffs paid during Fiscal 2025 and $5 million during First Quarter Fiscal 2026
- Newer filing adds $30 million and $12 million of additional COGS relating to IEEPA tariffs for Fiscal 2025 and Q1 FY2026
- Newer filing adds disclosure of $25 million in refund claims filed under Phase I of CBP refund process in Q1 FY2026
- Newer filing adds statement about uncertainty regarding refunds as of May 2, 2026 and decision not to record adjustments
- Newer filing adds disclosure of approximately $5 million in refunds received subsequent to Q1 FY2026 end
- Newer filing adds reference to February 24, 2026 new temporary tariffs under section 122 of Trade Act of 1974
- Newer filing adds disclosure of May 2026 Court of International Trade ruling finding section 122 tariffs unlawful with administrative stay pending appeal
- Newer filing adds expanded language about digital platforms, data analytics, and AI-enabled tools raising consumer expectations
- Newer filing adds specific reference to U.S.-Iran conflict and Middle East hostilities as geopolitical examples
- Removed:
- Older filing (2025-12-11) contains 'Key Operating Results' table showing First Nine Months Fiscal 2025 vs 2024 comparisons - not present in newer filing
- Older filing contains narrative explaining net loss per diluted share of $1.39 with specific impact items ($61 million impairment, tariffs impact of $18 million) - not present in newer filing
- Older filing contains reference to 'Johnny Was' impairment charges - not present in newer filing
- Older filing contains disclosure about previously excluding e-commerce flash clearance sales from comparable sales but now including them - not present in newer filing
- Reworded:
- Industry Overview section title reference changed from 'in our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the First Quarter of Fiscal 2025' to 'of our Fiscal 2025 Form 10-K'
- Newer filing uses 'highly dependent' vs older 'very dependent' regarding consumer spending cyclicality
- Newer filing states 'allocated a smaller portion' vs older 'chosen to spend less of their discretionary spending'
- Newer filing adds 'Further' as connector before discussing negative economic conditions impact, replacing older phrasing
- Newer filing states conditions 'may result in increased operating costs' vs older 'may result in increased operating costs and investments'
- Newer filing restructures tariff discussion into separate 'Tariffs' section heading vs older integrated narrative
- Newer filing uses 'elevated interest rates' vs older 'elevated interest rates for prolonged periods'
- Newer filing states 'Geopolitical tensions, including the U.S.-Iran conflict' vs older broader reference to 'heightened diplomatic tensions or political and civil unrest'
- Newer filing includes 'promotional activity across the industry has increased' as explicit consequence vs older implicit reference
- Newer filing describes conditions as creating 'complex and challenging retail environment that impacts our businesses' vs older 'has impacted and will continue to impact'
- Comparable Sales section uses 'food and beverage sales' (separated) vs older 'food & beverage sales' (abbreviated)
- Notes:
- The newer filing appears to be a quarterly report (Q1 FY2026) while the older filing references fiscal year comparisons, making some structural differences expected
- Truncation in the source text prevents full assessment of comparable sales definition section at the end
- The older filing contains operating results data that may have been removed because newer filing covers different period, not necessarily a substantive change
AI-assisted comparison of two SEC filing sections. It describes wording and theme changes only, makes no materiality, legal, or investment judgement, and is not financial advice. Informational only — not financial advice.
Insider activity (SEC Form 4)
1 open-market purchase and 0 open-market sales by insiders in the last 90 days.
- Last 90 days1 buy ($92250) · 0 sells — 1 buying insider
- Last 180 days1 buy ($92250) · 0 sells — 1 buying insider
Activity heuristic: net buying (a transparent product heuristic from the counts above, not a prediction or advice)
Most recent open-market transaction: 2026-06-12. As of 2026-08-24.
View full insider trading history → View SEC Form 3/4/5 filingsAsk about OXM's insider activity →
Only open-market purchases (SEC code P) and sales (code S) are counted here. Option exercises, vesting/awards, gifts, and shares withheld for taxes are excluded — they are compensation or mechanical, not open-market conviction. Sales may be planned and non-discretionary (e.g. a Rule 10b5-1 plan) and are not necessarily bearish; open-market buying is not a recommendation to buy. Informational only — not financial advice.
Institutional ownership (13F)
4 institutional 13F filers reported holding OXM as of 2026-03-31 (quarter-end position, filed within 45 days).
- Distinct 13F filers 4
- Reported shares held 4,996,316
- Reported value $192,408,144
reported quarterly holdings change (2025-12-31 → 2026-03-31): 0 new, 0 increased, 4 decreased, 0 exited. Change counts cover only managers that filed 13F reports in BOTH quarters, derived between two quarter-end snapshots — not same-day trades; a single manager is never said to have "bought" or "sold".
Institutional holdings are quarter-end long positions reported on SEC Form 13F-HR, filed up to 45 days after the quarter ends — they are delayed, are not real-time trades, exclude short positions and most non-US securities, and are not investment advice. Any increase/decrease is a reported change between two quarterly snapshots, not a same-day purchase or sale. These are quarter-end snapshots from the 13F filings on SEC EDGAR, filed within 45 days — not real-time, and any change is a difference between two quarterly reports, not a same-day trade. Informational only — not financial advice.
Short interest (FINRA)
OXM had 3,358,313 shares of reported short interest as of the 2026-07-31 FINRA settlement date (delayed, bi-monthly; not real-time).
OXM had 22.5% of its shares outstanding sold short as of the 2026-07-31 FINRA settlement date (percent of FLOAT would be higher — float is not disclosed in the source). FINRA reported 9.17 days to cover at the same settlement.
- Reported short interest (shares) 3,358,313
- Short interest (% of shares outstanding) 22.5%
- Prior settlement (shares) 3,288,124
- Reported change 2.13%
- Days to cover (reported) 9.17
Reported to FINRA as of the 2026-07-31 settlement date. Short interest is reported to FINRA and published on a delayed, bi-monthly schedule (as of a settlement date, disseminated roughly eight business days later) — it is NOT real-time, does not cover every venue or all US trading, and is not a short-squeeze prediction or investment advice. Days-to-cover is the value FINRA reports; percent of float is not shown because the source file carries no share-count denominator — where a percent appears it is of shares OUTSTANDING, the larger base, and is therefore a floor on percent of float. Informational only — not financial advice.
Competitors & peers
- PVH Corp (PVH)
- Ralph Lauren (RL)
- Capri Holdings (CPRI)
- Tapestry (TPR)
- V.F. Corporation (VFC)
- Guess (GES)
AI-enriched competitor set. Linked names are companies covered by stocks-llm; other named peers are shown for reference only.
Compare OXM vs…
Frequently asked questions
What does OXFORD INDUSTRIES INC (OXM) do?
Oxford Industries designs, sources, markets and distributes products under a portfolio of lifestyle brands including Tommy Bahama (56% of sales), Lilly Pulitzer, Johnny Was, Southern Tide, TBBC, Duck Head and Jack Rogers. The company operates 82% of its consolidated net sales through direct-to-consumer channels including brand-specific full-price retail stores, e-commerce websites, outlet stores, and Tommy Bahama food and beverage operations, with the remaining 18% from wholesale distribution…
What sector is OXFORD INDUSTRIES INC (OXM) in?
OXFORD INDUSTRIES INC (OXM) is classified in the Consumer Discretionary sector. Its industry is Apparel Retail and Lifestyle Brands. It trades on NYSE.
Does OXM pay a dividend?
Yes — OXFORD INDUSTRIES INC (OXM) pays a dividend, with an indicated yield of about 2.75% and at least 5 years of non-decreasing per-share dividends (SEC EDGAR XBRL) — we do not hold the year before it, so the real streak may be longer (market data, as of 2026-08-24). Informational only — not financial advice.
Who are OXFORD INDUSTRIES INC's (OXM) competitors?
Notable peers of OXFORD INDUSTRIES INC (OXM) include PVH Corp, Ralph Lauren, Capri Holdings, Tapestry and V.F. Corporation. This peer set is informational only — not financial advice.
Is OXFORD INDUSTRIES INC (OXM) overbought or oversold right now?
OXFORD INDUSTRIES INC (OXM) is currently neither overbought nor oversold — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 45, in the neutral middle (as of 2026-08-21). RSI describes recent price momentum, not a forecast — informational only, not financial advice.
Where does stocks-llm's data on OXM come from?
Fundamentals and prices come from market data, as of 2026-08-24; company filings and profile facts come from SEC EDGAR. All figures are delayed daily-close data shown with their as-of date — informational only, not financial advice.
Fundamentals: market data, as of 2026-08-24. Filings: SEC EDGAR. Prices are delayed daily-close data.
Last updated 2026-08-21.
Informational only — NOT financial advice. All figures are delayed daily-close data from SEC EDGAR & market data, shown with their as-of date.