PERPETUA RESOURCES CORP (PPTA)
Materials · gold mining and precious metals exploration · NASDAQ
Perpetua Resources is developing the Stibnite Gold Project in Idaho, aiming to become a critical domestic supplier of gold, antimony, and tungsten.
What PERPETUA RESOURCES CORP does
Perpetua Resources Corp is a mining and development company focused on the exploration and potential development of the Stibnite Gold Project in Idaho. The project is primarily designed to produce gold, while also serving as a potential domestic source of antimony and tungsten, which are considered critical minerals for national security and the clean energy transition. The company is actively engaged in permitting, environmental remediation, and feasibility planning for the site.
Themes: critical minerals, national security supply chain, clean energy transition minerals, gold mining, environmental remediation
Fundamentals
- Price$25.70 as of 2026-08-21 close
- Market cap$3.2B as of 2026-08-21
- 1-year return+43.8% 2025-08-21 close $17.87 → 2026-08-21 close $25.70
- P/En/a earnings data not available
- ROE-20.7% as of 2026-08-24
- Debt / equity0.00 as of 2026-08-24
- Beta4.10 as of 2026-08-24
- Last reported earnings2026-02-23 most recent in our data — SEC EDGAR Form 8-K (Item 2.02); no newer announcement filed
How PPTA compares in its sector
- return on equitybottom 25% 151 covered Materials peers, as of 2026-08-24
- free cash flow (absolute dollars, latest fiscal year)bottom 10% 124 covered Materials peers, as of FY2025
Position among covered Materials companies that report each metric (minimum 5 peers). A relative position within our covered catalog — not a valuation, quality, or investment judgment. A higher percentile is simply a higher value (for P/E, more expensive on earnings — never "better"). Informational only.
Top 10 scores & list membership
PPTA is not currently in any published Top 10 list. Its scores are below.
Long-term score
Not scored for the long-term list: no growth data.
Short-term score
42.9 #1090 of 1,698 scored · #54 of 83 in Materials
Volume and participation 89th: trading volume is about normal versus its 30-day average; setup 53rd: over the past year its closes ranged, and it has retraced around half of its move over the past year — 55% of it; weakest is trend 0th: a "death cross" — its 50-day average is below its 200-day. Its trend score is set to zero: its 50-day average is below its 200-day and the price is below both.
Scores as of 24 Aug 2026. Each bar is a percentile: how this company ranked against every company the score ranked, 0–100. A list is a published formula and its output, not a recommendation. Method version 3.
How PERPETUA RESOURCES CORP looks technically
PERPETUA RESOURCES CORP (PPTA) is trading 2.8% below its 200-day average, the long-term trend line — a long-term downtrend. Its 50-day average crossed below its 200-day average about 37 trading days ago — a "death cross", a bearish long-term signal. A strong uptrend is in place — ADX, a 0–100 trend-strength gauge, is 31, with buyers in control. Momentum is neutral — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 64, neither overbought (above 70) nor oversold (below 30). It made a new 20-day high about 3 trading days ago. It is 31.2% below its highest point of the past year.
Trend
8
| Distance from the 200-day | it is trading 2.8% below its 200-day average, the long-term trend line — a long-term downtrend | -2.8% |
|---|---|---|
| 50-day moving average | its average price over the last 50 trading days — a short-term trend line — is $21.45 | $21.45 |
| 200-day moving average | its average price over the last 200 trading days — the long-term trend line — is $26.44 | $26.44 |
| Swing structure | each recent peak has been higher than the one before it and each dip has been shallower — the pattern chart-watchers call an uptrend, which describes where price has already been and not where it goes next | higher highs and higher lows |
| Last swing turn | its last significant turn was a swing high 9 calendar days ago — the swings before that are what the structure reading is measured on | 9 sessions |
| Wave structure | its recent swings can be read as a five-part upward sequence — what Elliott-wave chartists call an impulse — now in the fourth leg, a pullback against that upward direction; the labelling fails if price closes below 19.6. It is one of several labellings that fit, and it describes the swings already printed, not what comes next. The same swings also read as a completed three-part correction. | possible upward five-wave sequence, in wave 4 (one of several readings) |
| Since the 50/200 cross | its 50-day average crossed below its 200-day average about 37 trading days ago — a "death cross", a bearish long-term signal | 37 sessions |
| Trend strength (14-day ADX) | a strong uptrend is in place — ADX, a 0–100 trend-strength gauge, is 31, with buyers in control | 30.8 |
Momentum
3
| 14-day RSI | momentum is neutral — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 64, neither overbought (above 70) nor oversold (below 30) | 63.9 |
|---|---|---|
| Position in its 14-day range | it is trading near the top of its 14-day range ($19.80 to $26.40) — its "stochastic" reading is 89 out of 100, where 0 would mean closing exactly at the 14-session low and 100 exactly at the high. This measures WHERE the price sits inside its recent range, which is a different question from the RSI beside it: RSI is a momentum gauge, measuring how FAST the price has been moving, so a stock can drift quietly to the bottom of its range with an ordinary RSI, or fall sharply and still sit in the middle. It has been climbing within that range over the last few sessions. | 89.4 |
| Since the MACD crossed zero | MACD, a trend-momentum gauge, is in positive territory (momentum leaning bullish) | 23 sessions |
Range
12
| 52-week high | its highest closing price over the past year (about 252 trading days) was $37.37 | $37.37 |
|---|---|---|
| From the 52-week high | it is 31.2% below its 52-week high (its highest price of the past year) | -31.2% |
| Above the 52-week low | it is 57.9% above its 52-week low (its lowest price of the past year) | +57.9% |
| Below the 52-week high | it is 31.2% below its highest point of the past year | 31.2% |
| Since a 20-day breakout | it made a new 20-day high about 3 trading days ago | 3 sessions |
| Since a 55-day breakout | it made a new 55-day low about 26 trading days ago | 26 sessions |
| All-time high | its highest closing price on record is $37.37 (set on 2026-03-02) | $37.37 |
| Given back of the 52-week move | over the past year its closes ranged ($16.35 to $37.22), and it has given back around half of its rise from last year’s low — 55% of it. Chart-watchers call 61.8%-65% given back the "golden pocket" — for this company that is $23.65 to $24.32. It is watched widely enough that orders cluster there, which is the honest reason it matters; it is not a forecast. | 55.2% |
| From the all-time high | it is 31.2% below its all-time high | -31.2% |
| Nearest price level | it is trading 1.7% below a resistance level at $26.14 — a price it turned at four times since 2026-02-05, most recently on 2026-08-12. Since 2024-08-21 it has 16 such levels below the current price and 2 above. Levels like these describe where the price has reversed or paused before; they are not a forecast of where it will go. | +1.7% |
| All-time low | its lowest closing price on record is $1.69 (set on 2022-10-21) | $1.69 |
| Above the all-time low | it is 1420.7% above its all-time low | +1,421% |
Volatility
5
| Band width vs its own 6 months | day-to-day price swings are unusually wide versus its own recent history (wider than about 93% of the past ~6 months) | 93rd percentile |
|---|---|---|
| Typical daily range | in a typical session it travels about $1.28 between its high and its low — about 5.0% of its price. That is its "average true range" over the last 14 sessions, which also counts the distance from the previous close, so a day that opens well away from yesterday counts as the large move it was | $1.28 |
| Bollinger bands (20-day, ±2σ) | most of its recent trading has stayed between about $16.39 and $28.69 — the "Bollinger bands", a range drawn two standard deviations either side of its 20-day average price, which widens when the stock gets more volatile and narrows when it settles | $16.39 – $22.54 – $28.69 |
| Typical daily range (% of price) | its price moves about 5.0% in a typical session — about typical for the companies we cover. This is the average gap between a session's high and low over the last 14 sessions, counting overnight moves, expressed against the current price so it can be compared with companies trading at any price | 5.0% |
| Stretch from the 200-day average | it is trading 0.6 daily ranges below its 200-day average price (2.8% below it in plain percentage terms) — a way of asking how far it has stretched from its own average in units of how far it normally moves in a day, so a calm company and a jumpy one can be compared on the same scale | 0.6 daily ranges below its 200-day average |
Volume
1
| Volume vs its 30-day average | trading volume is about normal versus its 30-day average | 1.68× |
|---|
Analyst
2
| Change in the average price target | analysts' average price target is unchanged from the prior reading | 0.0% |
|---|---|---|
| Change in the consensus rating | the analyst consensus rating is unchanged since the prior reading | unchanged |
Candlestick patterns
1
| Since a doji | 3 sessions ago it opened and closed at almost the same price after trading through a wider range — a "doji", the classic picture of buyers and sellers finishing the session level | 3 sessions ago |
|---|
Price gaps
3
| Gap at the open | it opened on 2026-08-21 4.7% above the previous session's close — an overnight gap, the part of the move that happened while the market was shut, and had not traded back through that level by the close | +4.7% |
|---|---|---|
| Open gap | it gapped 4.7% above the previous close today and has not traded back through the level it left behind at 25.05 — an "unfilled gap", which describes a price range no trade has since crossed and is not a forecast that it will be crossed | +4.7% |
| Gap filled | a 2.5% gap down opened on 2026-08-18 has been "filled" 2 sessions ago — price traded back through the level the gap left behind, and it took 1 session to close | 2 sessions ago |
Price streaks
1
| Closing streak | it closed higher in its latest session, after a session that did not close higher — a single up day rather than a run | 1 session up |
|---|
Relative strength
4
| vs market, 1 month | over the past 1 month this stock beat the market by 35.7 percentage points (the stock gained 38.0% while the market gained 2.3%) | +35.7% |
|---|---|---|
| vs market, 3 months | over the past 3 months this stock lagged the market by 6.9 percentage points (the stock lost 3.8% while the market gained 3.1%) | -6.9% |
| vs market, 6 months | over the past 6 months this stock lagged the market by 25.9 percentage points (the stock lost 14.8% while the market gained 11.1%) | -25.9% |
| vs market, 12 months | over the past 12 months this stock beat the market by 23.3 percentage points (the stock gained 43.8% while the market gained 20.5%) | +23.3% |
Signal agreement
2
| Bullish technical signals | 4 of the 9 technical signals we can compute for it are currently in a bullish state: a strong uptrend, with buyers in control, a fresh 20-day high, MACD momentum is positive, trading above the Ichimoku cloud — these describe past price behaviour, not a forecast | 4 of 9 |
|---|---|---|
| Bearish technical signals | 4 of the 9 technical signals we can compute for it are currently in a bearish state: a "death cross" — its 50-day average is below its 200-day, trading below its 200-day average, lagging the market over 6 months, near the top of its 14-day range (overbought) — these describe past price behaviour, not a forecast | 4 of 9 |
Trend (Ichimoku cloud)
1
| Vs the Ichimoku cloud | trading 4.0% above the Ichimoku cloud — a band drawn from where its own highs and lows sat up to 2026-07-16 and projected forward over today's price, the side traders read as an established uptrend, with the band below acting as the level that would have to give way. The band itself is thick, spanning 15.6% of the share price, which is taken to mean a barrier that has held for a while and takes effort to cross. | +4.0% |
|---|
Volume-weighted price
1
| Vs this year’s average price paid | the price is 6% below the average price paid so far this year, so the typical buyer over that stretch is under water. That average is $27.29 — a volume-weighted average of daily closes over 157 sessions, not a true tick-by-tick VWAP. | -5.8% |
|---|
Price levels it has turned at before
PPTA last closed at $25.70 on 2026-08-21. Since 2024-08-21 it has turned at 16 prices below its last close and 2 above; the 3 nearest below and the 2 nearest above are listed, nearest first.
| Level | Side | Distance | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| $26.14 | Resistance | 1.7% above the last close | turned there four times · 2026-02-05 to 2026-08-12 |
| $26.84 | Resistance | 4.4% above the last close | turned there twice · 2025-11-28 to 2026-06-16 |
| $23.90 | Support | 7.0% below the last close | turned there three times · 2025-12-10 to 2026-03-24 |
| $22.50 | Support | 12.5% below the last close | turned there three times · 2025-09-26 to 2026-07-02 |
| $19.68 | Support | 23.4% below the last close | turned there twice · 2025-09-03 to 2026-07-22 |
A level is a price this company reversed or paused at more than once — they describe past behaviour, not a forecast of where the price will go.
Wave structure
Its recent swings can be read as a five-part upward sequence — what Elliott-wave chartists call an impulse — now in leg 4 of five, a pullback against that direction.
This labelling fails — stops being a possible reading at all — if it closes below $19.60.
This is one of several labellings that fit the same swings, so treat it as a reading rather than the reading. It was chosen from 2 labellings that survived the rules, counting shorter readings of the same bars.
On past moves of this shape the leg has usually ended somewhere between $21.55 and $24.11 — that is where it has tended to end if the count holds, not a forecast of where the price goes.
Alternate reading: The same swings also read as a completed three-part correction, which fails on a close above $26.40.
This reading has stood for 3 trading days, since 2026-08-19.
Read from daily closes as of 2026-08-21.
An Elliott-wave count describes the swings already printed and the level that would disprove it. It is not a forecast, a target, or advice.
Screens: Trading below the 200-day moving average · Pulled back from the 12-month high · Broke out to a new 20-day high · in a strong, established uptrend (ADX) · lagging the market · Gapped up at the open (3%+) | Learn: moving average · golden cross · adx · rsi · breakout · fifty two week high low
Based on daily closing prices as of 2026-08-21. Describes past price behavior only — informational, not financial advice.
Analyst consensus
- Consensus ratingStrong Buy (1.29 mean, 1=Strong Buy…5=Strong Sell) — 5 analysts
- Mean price target$36.90 range $30.00 – $43.50; median $37.00
Analyst estimates, as of 2026-08-23. These are third-party analyst opinions and price targets, aggregated — not a recommendation, prediction, or advice from stocks-llm. Informational only.
Analyst EPS estimate for PPTA
- Consensus EPS estimate-$0.275 next reporting period, as of 2026-08-23
Change over time is not available yet: it needs two readings of the same reporting period at least 30 days apart, and we have been recording these estimates since 2026-08-04. An estimate for a DIFFERENT quarter is not a revision, so a reading from before the last report is never compared with one after it.
The consensus estimate for the next reporting period, and how it has moved between readings of that SAME period. A change is measured only between readings estimating one period — when a company reports, the consensus moves to the next quarter and the two numbers are not comparable. Informational only, not a forecast and not advice.
Key risks (from latest filing)
["Reliance on obtaining and maintaining complex environmental and mining permits for the Stibnite Gold Project.","Significant uncertainty regarding the finalization, funding, and terms of proposed financing from the U.S. Export-Import Bank.","Inherent risks in mineral exploration and the potential that resources or reserves may not reach commercial viability."]
What changed in the latest 10-Q
AI-assisted comparison of PPTA's 10-Q filed 2026-05-11 against the prior one filed 2025-11-14.
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
- Added:
- Newer filing references 'three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025' vs. older filing references 'three and nine months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024'
- Newer filing states company name as 'Perpetua Resources Corp. (formerly Midas Gold Corp.)' without legal entity reference; older filing includes '(the "BCBCA")' reference
- Newer filing describes operations as 'mineral exploration and development' vs. older filing states 'mineral exploration' only
- Newer filing 2026 Outlook includes specific goal to 'Complete project financing, including closing an approximately $2.7 billion proposed senior secured long-term loan from U.S. EXIM'
- Newer filing 2026 Outlook includes goal to 'Commence full construction of the Project following a final investment and construction decision for the Project in the second half of 2026'
- Newer filing 2026 Outlook includes goal to 'Advance commercial downstream antimony off-site processing and offtake agreements'
- Newer filing 2026 Outlook includes goal to 'Continue project-wide exploration and testing to further expand the Company's gold and antimony resources and reserves, and validate potential tungsten opportunities at the Project'
- Newer filing First Quarter 2026 highlights include Congressional notice posting by U.S. EXIM Board and anticipation of final vote in Q2 2026
- Newer filing highlights include publication of updated technical report summary in March 2026
- Newer filing highlights include receipt of final Stream Alteration Permit from IDWR in January 2026
- Newer filing highlights include receipt of final IPDES permit for industrial wastewater discharges in January 2026
- Newer filing highlights include successful transition from Ausenco to Hatch as EPCM for processing plant
- Newer filing Financing Activities section references $2.7 billion senior secured loan vs. older filing's $2.0 billion
- Newer filing states board of U.S. EXIM initiated last formal step before vote on March 30, 2026
- Newer filing references 25-day notice period expiration on April 24, 2026
- Newer filing specifies direct loan of approximately $2.2 billion for construction vs. older filing's $2.0 billion total
- Newer filing references $669.5 million cash on hand as of March 31, 2026
- Newer filing references estimated direct capital costs of $2,576 million based on December 31, 2025 TRS
- Newer filing states board has included loan on May 21, 2026 meeting agenda
- Removed:
- Older filing 2025 Outlook goal 'Advance detailed engineering, contracting, long lead procurement, and execution planning to be full sanction construction-ready in the spring of 2026' not in newer filing
- Older filing 2025 Outlook goal 'Expand the management team and workforce to support full-scale construction and operations' replaced with different wording in newer filing
- Older filing Third Quarter 2025 highlights including June equity offering, U.S. EXIM Preliminary Project Letter, USFS Conditional Notice to Proceed, RFP for off-site processing, CFO appointment, October 21, 2025 early works construction commencement, Agnico Eagle and JPMorgan equity investment, and registered equity offering closings are not in newer filing
- Older filing Financing Update section with detailed breakdown of $807 million equity offerings (specific June 2025, July 2025, October 28, 2025, and October 30-31, 2025 closings) is not in newer filing
- Older filing references to May 2025 formal application submission and September 2025 preliminary project letter and indicative terms sheet not in newer filing
- Reworded:
- Newer filing refers to 'Financing Activities' section heading vs. older filing's 'Financing Update'
- Newer filing states loan 'if approved, is expected to be comprised of' vs. older filing's more general references to financing elements
- Newer filing includes specific cautionary language about U.S. EXIM board agenda being subject to change and no assurance of approval at specific meeting or at all
- Newer filing adds language that 'This action by the board of U.S. EXIM does not represent a financing commitment from U.S. EXIM'
- Notes:
- Older filing text appears truncated at end of Financing Update section (ends with 'See "'); comparison is based on available text
- Newer filing text also appears truncated at end of Financing Activities section (ends with 'See "'); comparison is based on available text
- The two filings represent different reporting periods (Q1 2026 vs. Q3 2025) and therefore different fiscal timeframes naturally account for some differences
Risk Factors
- Added:
- Added to newer filing: extensive details about U.S. EXIM financing review process, documentation, closing and funding, conditions precedent, and final terms
- Added to newer filing: detailed discussion of South Fork Salmon Water Quality Enhancement Fund and Nez Perce Tribe CWA lawsuit outcomes
- Added to newer filing: statements regarding environmental clean-up actions by company and contractors
- Added to newer filing: predictions regarding water quality, water temperature, fish habitats improvements and timing thereof
- Added to newer filing: material assumptions section specifying U.S. EXIM board approval, definitive documentation execution, financing sufficiency for permitting and construction
- Added to newer filing: assumptions regarding compliance with financing covenants and future bonding/financial assurance requirements
- Added to newer filing: assumptions regarding litigation outcomes and permit defense
- Added to newer filing: reference to 'Technical Report Summary' as source for mineral reserve assumptions
- Removed:
- Removed from newer filing: phrase 'as, amended' after 'Securities Exchange Act of 1934'
- Removed from newer filing: words 'forecast,' 'likely,' and 'potential' from list of forward-looking statement indicators
- Removed from newer filing: entire bullet-point list of specific risk factors that appeared in older filing (approximately 20+ bullets)
- Removed from newer filing: reference to 'Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024' replaced with 'Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025'
- Removed from newer filing: multiple specific risk bullets including those about delays in permits, financing from U.S. EXIM, financial resources, conditions to financing, litigation challenges, commodity prices, competition, weather impacts, equipment/labor/materials availability
- Reworded:
- Newer filing specifies 'Form 10-Q (the "Quarterly Report")' versus older filing just states 'Quarterly Report'
- Newer filing includes 'as amended' parenthetical for Exchange Act reference in older version
- Newer filing reorganizes forward-looking statement content structure, placing detailed assumptions and specific project references earlier in the cautionary note
- Newer filing expands on U.S. EXIM financing details and conditions, making them part of the cautionary narrative rather than bullet points
- Text ending differs: newer filing's forward-looking statements section appears incomplete/truncated at end, older filing contains complete bulleted risk factor list
- Notes:
- The newer filing appears to be incomplete or truncated at the end of the provided text ('These factors include, b'), preventing full comparison of risk factors section
- The older filing's Risk Factors section (Item 1A) page number is 33 versus 35 in newer filing, suggesting content reorganization
- Comparison shows reorganization from bullet-point risk factor format in older filing to narrative paragraph format in newer filing's cautionary note section
- Unable to assess whether risk factor content was moved to a different location in Item 1A or removed entirely due to truncation of newer filing text
AI-assisted comparison of two SEC filing sections. It describes wording and theme changes only, makes no materiality, legal, or investment judgement, and is not financial advice. Informational only — not financial advice.
Insider activity (SEC Form 4)
No open-market insider purchases or sales recorded in the last 90 days.
- Last 180 days0 buys · 3 sells ($376421) — 2 selling insiders
Most recent open-market transaction: 2026-04-02. As of 2026-08-25.
View full insider trading history → View SEC Form 3/4/5 filingsAsk about PPTA's insider activity →
Only open-market purchases (SEC code P) and sales (code S) are counted here. Option exercises, vesting/awards, gifts, and shares withheld for taxes are excluded — they are compensation or mechanical, not open-market conviction. Sales may be planned and non-discretionary (e.g. a Rule 10b5-1 plan) and are not necessarily bearish; open-market buying is not a recommendation to buy. Informational only — not financial advice.
Institutional ownership (13F)
4 institutional 13F filers reported holding PPTA as of 2026-03-31 (quarter-end position, filed within 45 days).
- Distinct 13F filers 4
- Reported shares held 7,731,452
- Reported value $217,408,440
reported quarterly holdings change (2025-12-31 → 2026-03-31): 0 new, 3 increased, 1 decreased, 0 exited. Change counts cover only managers that filed 13F reports in BOTH quarters, derived between two quarter-end snapshots — not same-day trades; a single manager is never said to have "bought" or "sold".
Institutional holdings are quarter-end long positions reported on SEC Form 13F-HR, filed up to 45 days after the quarter ends — they are delayed, are not real-time trades, exclude short positions and most non-US securities, and are not investment advice. Any increase/decrease is a reported change between two quarterly snapshots, not a same-day purchase or sale. These are quarter-end snapshots from the 13F filings on SEC EDGAR, filed within 45 days — not real-time, and any change is a difference between two quarterly reports, not a same-day trade. Informational only — not financial advice.
Short interest (FINRA)
PPTA had 11,365,610 shares of reported short interest as of the 2026-07-31 FINRA settlement date (delayed, bi-monthly; not real-time).
PPTA had 9.09% of its shares outstanding sold short as of the 2026-07-31 FINRA settlement date (percent of FLOAT would be higher — float is not disclosed in the source). FINRA reported 9.78 days to cover at the same settlement.
- Reported short interest (shares) 11,365,610
- Short interest (% of shares outstanding) 9.09%
- Prior settlement (shares) 11,832,464
- Reported change -3.95%
- Days to cover (reported) 9.78
Reported to FINRA as of the 2026-07-31 settlement date. Short interest is reported to FINRA and published on a delayed, bi-monthly schedule (as of a settlement date, disseminated roughly eight business days later) — it is NOT real-time, does not cover every venue or all US trading, and is not a short-squeeze prediction or investment advice. Days-to-cover is the value FINRA reports; percent of float is not shown because the source file carries no share-count denominator — where a percent appears it is of shares OUTSTANDING, the larger base, and is therefore a floor on percent of float. Informational only — not financial advice.
Competitors & peers
- Barrick Gold (GOLD)
- Newmont (NEM)
- Kinross Gold (KGC)
- Coeur Mining (CDE)
- Hecla Mining (HL)
AI-enriched competitor set. Linked names are companies covered by stocks-llm; other named peers are shown for reference only.
Compare PPTA vs…
PERPETUA RESOURCES CORP is found in…
Frequently asked questions
What does PERPETUA RESOURCES CORP (PPTA) do?
Perpetua Resources Corp is a mining and development company focused on the exploration and potential development of the Stibnite Gold Project in Idaho. The project is primarily designed to produce gold, while also serving as a potential domestic source of antimony and tungsten, which are considered critical minerals for national security and the clean energy transition. The company is actively engaged in permitting, environmental remediation, and feasibility planning for the site.
What sector is PERPETUA RESOURCES CORP (PPTA) in?
PERPETUA RESOURCES CORP (PPTA) is classified in the Materials sector. Its industry is gold mining and precious metals exploration. It trades on NASDAQ.
Who are PERPETUA RESOURCES CORP's (PPTA) competitors?
Notable peers of PERPETUA RESOURCES CORP (PPTA) include Barrick Gold, Newmont, Kinross Gold, Coeur Mining and Hecla Mining. This peer set is informational only — not financial advice.
Is PERPETUA RESOURCES CORP (PPTA) overbought or oversold right now?
PERPETUA RESOURCES CORP (PPTA) is currently neither overbought nor oversold — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 64, in the neutral middle (as of 2026-08-21). RSI describes recent price momentum, not a forecast — informational only, not financial advice.
Where does stocks-llm's data on PPTA come from?
Fundamentals and prices come from market data, as of 2026-08-24; company filings and profile facts come from SEC EDGAR. All figures are delayed daily-close data shown with their as-of date — informational only, not financial advice.
Fundamentals: market data, as of 2026-08-24. Filings: SEC EDGAR. Prices are delayed daily-close data.
Last updated 2026-08-21.
Informational only — NOT financial advice. All figures are delayed daily-close data from SEC EDGAR & market data, shown with their as-of date.