AleAnna, Inc. (ANNA)
Energy · Natural gas exploration and production; renewable natural gas / biomethane · NASDAQ
Italian natural gas explorer and renewable biomethane producer delivering critical European gas supplies from the Longanesi field and utility-scale biogas projects.
What AleAnna, Inc. does
AleAnna is a natural gas resource company focused on delivering critical natural gas supplies to Europe through conventional natural gas exploration and development in Italy, particularly the Longanesi field in the Po Valley (one of Italy's largest modern discoveries with a 33.5% working interest), and renewable natural gas development from animal and agricultural waste. The company achieved first production at Longanesi in March 2025 and has signed an exclusive gas sales agreement with Shell Energy Europe Limited. It also operates renewable natural gas plant projects across Italy acquired between March–July 2024.
Themes: Natural gas exploration and production, Renewable natural gas / biomethane, Europe natural gas supply, Italy oil and gas, Carbon-negative energy
Fundamentals
- Price$2.75 as of 2026-08-26 close
- Market cap$167M as of 2026-08-27
- 1-year return-35.3% 2025-08-26 close $4.25 → 2026-08-26 close $2.75
- P/E28.46 as of 2026-08-27
- Net margin+17.4% as of 2026-08-27
- Gross margin+79.5% as of 2026-08-27
- ROE+16.9% as of 2026-08-27
- Debt / equity0.00 as of 2026-08-27
- Revenue growth (YoY)+1349.5% as of 2026-08-27
- Beta-1.66 as of 2026-08-27
- Last reported earnings2026-08-13 SEC EDGAR Form 8-K (Item 2.02)
How ANNA compares in its sector
- price-to-earnings ratiomiddle range 115 covered Energy peers, as of 2026-08-27
- net profit marginmiddle range 149 covered Energy peers, as of 2026-08-27
- operating margintop 25% 149 covered Energy peers, as of 2026-08-27
- gross margintop 25% 142 covered Energy peers, as of 2026-08-27
- return on equitymiddle range 152 covered Energy peers, as of 2026-08-27
Position among covered Energy companies that report each metric (minimum 5 peers). A relative position within our covered catalog — not a valuation, quality, or investment judgment. A higher percentile is simply a higher value (for P/E, more expensive on earnings — never "better"). Informational only.
How AleAnna, Inc. looks technically
AleAnna, Inc. (ANNA) is trading 19.7% below its 200-day average, the long-term trend line — a long-term downtrend. Its 50-day average crossed below its 200-day average about 39 trading days ago — a "death cross", a bearish long-term signal. There is no clear trend right now — the price is choppy (ADX, a 0–100 trend-strength gauge, is 12, below the 25 that marks a real trend). Momentum is neutral — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 48, neither overbought (above 70) nor oversold (below 30). MACD, a trend-momentum gauge, turned bullish about 8 trading days ago (its momentum flipped positive). It made a new 20-day low about 16 trading days ago. It is 74.2% below its highest point of the past year. Day-to-day price swings are unusually narrow versus its own recent history — a "Bollinger squeeze" (in the tightest 4% of the past ~6 months), which often precedes a bigger move.
Trend
8
| Distance from the 200-day | it is trading 19.7% below its 200-day average, the long-term trend line — a long-term downtrend | -19.7% |
|---|---|---|
| 50-day moving average | its average price over the last 50 trading days — a short-term trend line — is $2.91 | $2.91 |
| 200-day moving average | its average price over the last 200 trading days — the long-term trend line — is $3.42 | $3.42 |
| Swing structure | each recent peak has been lower than the one before it and each dip deeper — the pattern chart-watchers call a downtrend, which describes where price has already been and not where it goes next | lower highs and lower lows |
| Last swing turn | its last significant turn was a swing low 15 calendar days ago — the swings before that are what the structure reading is measured on | 15 sessions |
| Wave structure | its recent swings can be read as a five-part downward sequence — what Elliott-wave chartists call an impulse — now in the fourth leg, a pullback against that downward direction; the labelling fails if price closes above 2.9. It is one of several labellings that fit, and it describes the swings already printed, not what comes next. The same swings also read as a completed three-part correction. | possible downward five-wave sequence, in wave 4 (one of several readings) |
| Since the 50/200 cross | its 50-day average crossed below its 200-day average about 39 trading days ago — a "death cross", a bearish long-term signal | 39 sessions |
| Trend strength (14-day ADX) | there is no clear trend right now — the price is choppy (ADX, a 0–100 trend-strength gauge, is 12, below the 25 that marks a real trend) | 11.9 |
Momentum
3
| 14-day RSI | momentum is neutral — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 48, neither overbought (above 70) nor oversold (below 30) | 47.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Position in its 14-day range | it is trading in the upper half of its 14-day range ($2.40 to $2.98) — its "stochastic" reading is 60 out of 100, where 0 would mean closing exactly at the 14-session low and 100 exactly at the high. This measures WHERE the price sits inside its recent range, which is a different question from the RSI beside it: RSI is a momentum gauge, measuring how FAST the price has been moving, so a stock can drift quietly to the bottom of its range with an ordinary RSI, or fall sharply and still sit in the middle. It has been climbing within that range over the last few sessions. | 60.3 |
| Since the MACD crossed zero | MACD, a trend-momentum gauge, turned bullish about 8 trading days ago (its momentum flipped positive) | 8 sessions |
Range
12
| 52-week high | its highest closing price over the past year (about 252 trading days) was $10.64 | $10.64 |
|---|---|---|
| From the 52-week high | it is 74.2% below its 52-week high (its highest price of the past year) | -74.2% |
| Above the 52-week low | it is 19.0% above its 52-week low (its lowest price of the past year) | +19.1% |
| Below the 52-week high | it is 74.2% below its highest point of the past year | 74.2% |
| Since a 20-day breakout | it made a new 20-day low about 16 trading days ago | 16 sessions |
| Since a 55-day breakout | it made a new 55-day low about 16 trading days ago | 16 sessions |
| All-time high | its highest closing price on record is $18.70 (set on 2024-12-16) | $18.70 |
| Given back of the 52-week move | over the past year its closes ranged ($2.31 to $10.24), and it has given back almost all of its rise from last year’s low — 94% of it. Chart-watchers call 61.8%-65% given back the "golden pocket" — for this company that is $5.09 to $5.34. It is watched widely enough that orders cluster there, which is the honest reason it matters; it is not a forecast. | 94.5% |
| From the all-time high | it is 85.3% below its all-time high | -85.3% |
| Nearest price level | it is trading 12.5% above a support level at $2.41 — a price it turned at twice since 2026-01-29, most recently on 2026-08-11. Since 2024-08-26 it has 2 such levels below the current price and 9 above. Levels like these describe where the price has reversed or paused before; they are not a forecast of where it will go. | -12.5% |
| All-time low | its lowest closing price on record is $2.31 (set on 2026-01-12) | $2.31 |
| Above the all-time low | it is 19.0% above its all-time low | +19.1% |
Volatility
5
| Band width vs its own 6 months | day-to-day price swings are unusually narrow versus its own recent history — a "Bollinger squeeze" (in the tightest 4% of the past ~6 months), which often precedes a bigger move | 4th percentile |
|---|---|---|
| Typical daily range | in a typical session it travels about $0.1977 between its high and its low — about 7.2% of its price. That is its "average true range" over the last 14 sessions, which also counts the distance from the previous close, so a day that opens well away from yesterday counts as the large move it was | $0.1977 |
| Bollinger bands (20-day, ±2σ) | most of its recent trading has stayed between about $2.38 and $2.95 — the "Bollinger bands", a range drawn two standard deviations either side of its 20-day average price, which widens when the stock gets more volatile and narrows when it settles | $2.38 – $2.67 – $2.95 |
| Typical daily range (% of price) | its price moves about 7.2% in a typical session — more volatile than most companies we cover. This is the average gap between a session's high and low over the last 14 sessions, counting overnight moves, expressed against the current price so it can be compared with companies trading at any price | 7.2% |
| Stretch from the 200-day average | it is trading 3.4 daily ranges below its 200-day average price (19.7% below it in plain percentage terms) — a way of asking how far it has stretched from its own average in units of how far it normally moves in a day, so a calm company and a jumpy one can be compared on the same scale | 3.4 daily ranges below its 200-day average |
Volume
1
| Volume vs its 30-day average | trading volume is about normal versus its 30-day average | 0.84× |
|---|
Candlestick patterns
1
| Since a doji | today it opened and closed at almost the same price after trading through a wider range — a "doji", the classic picture of buyers and sellers finishing the session level | today |
|---|
Price gaps
3
| Gap at the open | it opened on 2026-08-26 1.5% above the previous session's close — an overnight gap, the part of the move that happened while the market was shut, and traded back through that level before the close | +1.5% |
|---|---|---|
| Open gap | it gapped 3.2% above the previous close 8 sessions ago and has not traded back through the level it left behind at 2.5 — an "unfilled gap", which describes a price range no trade has since crossed and is not a forecast that it will be crossed | +3.2% |
| Gap filled | a 2.8% gap up opened on 2026-08-21 has been "filled" 3 sessions ago — price traded back through the level the gap left behind, and it closed again during the very session that opened it | 3 sessions ago |
Price streaks
1
| Closing streak | it has closed higher 2 sessions in a row, a +3.38% move over the run — an unbroken run of up days, which describes what has already happened and says nothing about the next session | 2 sessions up |
|---|
Relative strength
4
| vs market, 1 month | over the past 1 month this stock lagged the market by 21.1 percentage points (the stock lost 17.4% while the market gained 3.7%) | -21.1% |
|---|---|---|
| vs market, 3 months | over the past 3 months this stock lagged the market by 17.1 percentage points (the stock lost 14.3% while the market gained 2.7%) | -17.1% |
| vs market, 6 months | over the past 6 months this stock lagged the market by 29.0 percentage points (the stock lost 17.9% while the market gained 11.1%) | -29.1% |
| vs market, 12 months | over the past 12 months this stock lagged the market by 54.0 percentage points (the stock lost 35.3% while the market gained 18.7%) | -54.0% |
Signal agreement
2
| Bullish technical signals | 1 of the 9 technical signals we can compute for it is currently in a bullish state: MACD momentum is positive — these describe past price behaviour, not a forecast | 1 of 9 |
|---|---|---|
| Bearish technical signals | 4 of the 9 technical signals we can compute for it are currently in a bearish state: a "death cross" — its 50-day average is below its 200-day, trading below its 200-day average, lagging the market over 6 months, trading below the Ichimoku cloud — these describe past price behaviour, not a forecast | 4 of 9 |
Trend (Ichimoku cloud)
1
| Vs the Ichimoku cloud | trading 13% below the Ichimoku cloud — a band drawn from where its own highs and lows sat up to 2026-07-21 and projected forward over today's price, the side traders read as an established downtrend, with the band above acting as the level that would have to be cleared. The band itself is thick, spanning 17.4% of the share price, which is taken to mean a barrier that has held for a while and takes effort to cross. | -13.1% |
|---|
Volume-weighted price
1
| Vs this year’s average price paid | the price is 59% below the average price paid so far this year, so the typical buyer over that stretch is under water. That average is $6.63 — a volume-weighted average of daily closes over 153 sessions, not a true tick-by-tick VWAP. | -58.5% |
|---|
Price levels it has turned at before
ANNA last closed at $2.75 on 2026-08-26. Since 2024-08-26 it has turned at 2 prices below its last close and 9 above; the 2 nearest below and the 3 nearest above are listed, nearest first.
| Level | Side | Distance | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| $2.41 | Support | 12.5% below the last close | turned there twice · 2026-01-29 to 2026-08-11 |
| $3.10 | Resistance | 12.7% above the last close | turned there three times · 2025-10-30 to 2025-12-22 |
| $2.31 | Support | 16.0% below the last close | turned there twice · 2026-01-12 to 2026-02-17 |
| $3.55 | Resistance | 29.1% above the last close | turned there three times · 2025-11-06 to 2026-04-17 |
| $3.64 | Resistance | 32.3% above the last close | turned there twice · 2025-11-18 to 2026-06-10 |
A level is a price this company reversed or paused at more than once — they describe past behaviour, not a forecast of where the price will go.
Wave structure
Its recent swings can be read as a five-part downward sequence — what Elliott-wave chartists call an impulse — now in leg 4 of five, a pullback against that direction.
This labelling fails — stops being a possible reading at all — if it closes above $2.90.
This is one of several labellings that fit the same swings, so treat it as a reading rather than the reading. It was chosen from 2 labellings that survived the rules, counting shorter readings of the same bars.
On past moves of this shape the leg has usually ended somewhere between $2.69 and $2.90 — that is where it has tended to end if the count holds, not a forecast of where the price goes.
Alternate reading: The same swings also read as a completed three-part correction, which fails on a close below $2.40.
This reading has stood for 9 trading days, since 2026-08-14.
Read from daily closes as of 2026-08-26.
An Elliott-wave count describes the swings already printed and the level that would disprove it. It is not a forecast, a target, or advice.
Screens: Trading below the 200-day moving average · Pulled back from the 12-month high · in a Bollinger Band volatility squeeze · trendless / choppy (low ADX) · lagging the market · Printed a doji candle | Learn: moving average · golden cross · adx · rsi · macd · breakout · fifty two week high low · bollinger bands
Based on daily closing prices as of 2026-08-26. Describes past price behavior only — informational, not financial advice.
Key risks (from latest filing)
["Regulatory and permitting delays: permanent processing facility completion expected early 2027; gas production is contingent on commencement of operations and infrastructure buildout","Gas sales concentration: exclusive buyer relationship with Shell Energy Europe Limited creates buyer concentration risk for conventional natural gas revenue","Commodity price and market exposure: natural gas price volatility and European market conditions could impact revenue and cash generation from operations"]
What changed in the latest 10-Q
AI-assisted comparison of ANNA's 10-Q filed 2026-05-14 against the prior one filed 2025-11-12.
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
- Added:
- Reference to Annual Report on Form 10-K for year ended December 31, 2025, filed March 30, 2026 (newer filing)
- Expanded 'Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements' section with detailed forward-looking statement definitions and risk factor list (newer filing)
- Specific reference to Part II, Item 1A 'Risk Factors' in the quarterly report (newer filing)
- Mention that Longanesi, Trava and Gradizza wells were classified by DeGolyer and MacNaughton (newer filing)
- Note that wells had not yet started production as of December 31, 2025 (newer filing)
- Statement that first production from Longanesi field was achieved in 2025 (newer filing)
- Removed:
- Generic forward-looking statements paragraph referencing 'Risk Factors' in Annual Report on Form 10-K (older filing)
- Reference to Annual Report on Form 10-K for year ended December 31, 2024, filed March 31, 2025 (older filing)
- Year reference changed from 'three and nine months ended September 30, 2025 or 2024' to 'three months ended March 31, 2026 or 2025' (older filing)
- Reference to DeGolyer only, without 'and MacNaughton' (older filing)
- Reference to December 31, 2024 as the reserve classification date (older filing)
- Statement that renewable natural gas business was launched 'In 2021' (older filing)
- Reference to 'U.S. GAAP' or 'GAAP' expanded to full definition (older filing contains only 'GAAP')
- Reworded:
- Forward-looking statements section expanded from brief paragraph to comprehensive multi-bullet-point cautionary note with specific terminology examples and risk factors (newer vs. older)
- Renewable natural gas business launch year changed from 'In 2021' to 'In 2023' (newer filing)
- Classification firm name expanded from 'DeGolyer' to 'DeGolyer and MacNaughton' (newer filing)
- Reserve classification date changed from December 31, 2024 to December 31, 2025 (newer filing)
- Drilling activity period changed from 'three and nine months ended September 30, 2025 or 2024' to 'three months ended March 31, 2026 or 2025' reflecting different quarterly reporting periods (newer filing)
- Accounting definition expanded to explicitly include 'U.S. GAAP' or 'GAAP' where older only stated 'GAAP' (newer filing)
- Notes:
- Text is truncated at end of both filings; comparison limited to provided sections
- Differences in reporting periods (Q3 2025 in older vs. Q1 2026 in newer) affect some factual statements about drilling activity and production status
- Some changes reflect updates from annual report filings occurring between the two quarterly filings
Risk Factors
The two filings could not be meaningfully compared for this section.
AI-assisted comparison of two SEC filing sections. It describes wording and theme changes only, makes no materiality, legal, or investment judgement, and is not financial advice. Informational only — not financial advice.
Insider activity (SEC Form 4)
No open-market insider purchases or sales recorded in the last 90 days.
- Last 180 days0 buys · 7 sells ($1M) — 1 selling insider
Most recent open-market transaction: 2026-03-06. As of 2026-08-27.
View full insider trading history → View SEC Form 3/4/5 filingsAsk about ANNA's insider activity →
Only open-market purchases (SEC code P) and sales (code S) are counted here. Option exercises, vesting/awards, gifts, and shares withheld for taxes are excluded — they are compensation or mechanical, not open-market conviction. Sales may be planned and non-discretionary (e.g. a Rule 10b5-1 plan) and are not necessarily bearish; open-market buying is not a recommendation to buy. Informational only — not financial advice.
Institutional ownership (13F)
1 institutional 13F filer reported holding ANNA as of 2026-03-31 (quarter-end position, filed within 45 days).
- Distinct 13F filers 1
- Reported shares held 21,290
- Reported value $176,494
Institutional holdings are quarter-end long positions reported on SEC Form 13F-HR, filed up to 45 days after the quarter ends — they are delayed, are not real-time trades, exclude short positions and most non-US securities, and are not investment advice. Any increase/decrease is a reported change between two quarterly snapshots, not a same-day purchase or sale. These are quarter-end snapshots from the 13F filings on SEC EDGAR, filed within 45 days — not real-time, and any change is a difference between two quarterly reports, not a same-day trade. Informational only — not financial advice.
Short interest (FINRA)
ANNA had 195,089 shares of reported short interest as of the 2026-07-31 FINRA settlement date (delayed, bi-monthly; not real-time).
Short interest as a percent of shares outstanding is not shown for ANNA because we do not hold a verified share count to divide it by. The reported figures above are unaffected.
- Reported short interest (shares) 195,089
- Prior settlement (shares) 163,983
- Reported change 18.97%
- Days to cover (reported) 1
Reported to FINRA as of the 2026-07-31 settlement date. Short interest is reported to FINRA and published on a delayed, bi-monthly schedule (as of a settlement date, disseminated roughly eight business days later) — it is NOT real-time, does not cover every venue or all US trading, and is not a short-squeeze prediction or investment advice. Days-to-cover is the value FINRA reports; percent of float is not shown because the source file carries no share-count denominator — where a percent appears it is of shares OUTSTANDING, the larger base, and is therefore a floor on percent of float. Informational only — not financial advice.
Competitors & peers
- Eni (E)
- Shell
- Exxon Mobil (XOM)
- Edison S.p.A.
- Iren S.p.A.
- A2A S.p.A.
AI-enriched competitor set. Linked names are companies covered by stocks-llm; other named peers are shown for reference only.
Compare ANNA vs…
ANNA ranks in…
Frequently asked questions
What does AleAnna, Inc. (ANNA) do?
AleAnna is a natural gas resource company focused on delivering critical natural gas supplies to Europe through conventional natural gas exploration and development in Italy, particularly the Longanesi field in the Po Valley (one of Italy's largest modern discoveries with a 33.5% working interest), and renewable natural gas development from animal and agricultural waste.
What sector is AleAnna, Inc. (ANNA) in?
AleAnna, Inc. (ANNA) is classified in the Energy sector. Its industry is Natural gas exploration and production; renewable natural gas / biomethane. It trades on NASDAQ.
Who are AleAnna, Inc.'s (ANNA) competitors?
Notable peers of AleAnna, Inc. (ANNA) include Eni, Shell, Exxon Mobil, Edison S.p.A. and Iren S.p.A.. This peer set is informational only — not financial advice.
Is AleAnna, Inc. (ANNA) overbought or oversold right now?
AleAnna, Inc. (ANNA) is currently neither overbought nor oversold — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 48, in the neutral middle (as of 2026-08-26). RSI describes recent price momentum, not a forecast — informational only, not financial advice.
Where does stocks-llm's data on ANNA come from?
Fundamentals and prices come from market data, as of 2026-08-27; company filings and profile facts come from SEC EDGAR. All figures are delayed daily-close data shown with their as-of date — informational only, not financial advice.
Fundamentals: market data, as of 2026-08-27. Filings: SEC EDGAR. Prices are delayed daily-close data.
Last updated 2026-08-26.
Informational only — NOT financial advice. All figures are delayed daily-close data from SEC EDGAR & market data, shown with their as-of date.