Celsius Holdings (CELH)
Consumer Staples · Soft Drinks & Nonalcoholic Beverages · NASDAQ
A high-growth functional beverage company known for its fitness-oriented drinks and expanded portfolio including Alani Nu and Rockstar energy.
What Celsius Holdings does
Celsius Holdings is a beverage company that develops, markets, and distributes functional, calorie-burning fitness drinks. Following recent acquisitions, the company also manages the Alani Nu nutrition brand and the Rockstar energy drink brand in the U.S. and Canada. The company maintains a strategic distribution partnership with PepsiCo.
Themes: functional beverages, energy drinks, fitness & wellness drinks, consumer staples
Fundamentals
- Price$35.34 as of 2026-08-25 close
- Market cap$8.9B as of 2026-08-25
- 1-year return-41.3% 2025-08-25 close $60.19 → 2026-08-25 close $35.34
- P/E55.46 as of 2026-08-26
- Net margin+4.2% as of 2026-08-26
- Gross margin+48.8% as of 2026-08-26
- ROE+4.3% as of 2026-08-26
- Debt / equity0.23 as of 2026-08-26
- Revenue growth (YoY)+82.9% as of 2026-08-26
- Revenue CAGR (3y)+56.7% SEC XBRL
- Beta1.04 as of 2026-08-26
- Last reported earnings2026-08-06 SEC EDGAR Form 8-K (Item 2.02)
Dividend: yield +0.7%; pays a dividend.
How CELH compares in its sector
- price-to-earnings ratiotop 10% 97 covered Consumer Staples peers, as of 2026-08-26
- net profit marginmiddle range 116 covered Consumer Staples peers, as of 2026-08-26
- operating marginmiddle range 116 covered Consumer Staples peers, as of 2026-08-26
- gross margintop 25% 116 covered Consumer Staples peers, as of 2026-08-26
- return on equitymiddle range 116 covered Consumer Staples peers, as of 2026-08-26
- 3-year revenue CAGRtop 10% 109 covered Consumer Staples peers
- indicated dividend yieldbottom 10% 77 covered Consumer Staples peers, as of 2026-08-26
- free cash flow (absolute dollars, latest fiscal year)middle range 110 covered Consumer Staples peers, as of FY2025
Position among covered Consumer Staples companies that report each metric (minimum 5 peers). A relative position within our covered catalog — not a valuation, quality, or investment judgment. A higher percentile is simply a higher value (for P/E, more expensive on earnings — never "better"). Informational only.
Top 10 scores & list membership
CELH is not currently in any published Top 10 list. Its scores are below.
Long-term score
45.3 #1083 of 1,608 scored · #34 of 70 in Consumer Staples
Growth 98th (revenue growth year over year 82.9%, 3-year revenue CAGR 56.7%) and financial health 66th (debt to equity 0.2, free cash flow margin 15.2%); weakest is valuation (14th, price to earnings 71.1, price to book 7.5). Scored on 5 of 6 pillars — it pays a dividend, but its filings carry no per-share series to count increases from; no annual share count in its filings.
Short-term score
13.0 #1695 of 1,696 scored · #70 of 70 in Consumer Staples
Momentum 58th: MACD momentum is positive; volume and participation 40th: trading volume is about normal versus its 30-day average; weakest is trend 0th: a "death cross" — its 50-day average is below its 200-day. Its score is docked 10 points for overextended (RSI above 75 or stochastic above 90) and 5 points for short interest in the heaviest tenth of the field. Its trend score is set to zero: its 50-day average is below its 200-day and the price is below both.
Scores as of 25 Aug 2026. Each bar is a percentile: how this company ranked against every company the score ranked, 0–100. A list is a published formula and its output, not a recommendation. Method version 3.
How Celsius Holdings looks technically
Celsius Holdings (CELH) is trading 8.6% below its 200-day average, the long-term trend line — a long-term downtrend. Its 50-day average crossed below its 200-day average about 116 trading days ago — a "death cross", a bearish long-term signal. There is no clear trend right now — the price is choppy (ADX, a 0–100 trend-strength gauge, is 19, below the 25 that marks a real trend), though buyers have been pushing harder than sellers lately — pressure, not a trend. Momentum is neutral — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 69, neither overbought (above 70) nor oversold (below 30). MACD, a trend-momentum gauge, turned bullish about 9 trading days ago (its momentum flipped positive). It just made a new 20-day high, its first since 2026-04-09, pushing above its recent trading range. It is 47.0% below its highest point of the past year.
Trend
8
| Distance from the 200-day | it is trading 8.6% below its 200-day average, the long-term trend line — a long-term downtrend | -8.6% |
|---|---|---|
| 50-day moving average | its average price over the last 50 trading days — a short-term trend line — is $29.75 | $29.75 |
| 200-day moving average | its average price over the last 200 trading days — the long-term trend line — is $38.65 | $38.65 |
| Swing structure | each recent peak has been lower than the one before it and each dip deeper — the pattern chart-watchers call a downtrend, which describes where price has already been and not where it goes next | lower highs and lower lows |
| Last swing turn | its last significant turn was a swing low 19 calendar days ago — the swings before that are what the structure reading is measured on | 19 sessions |
| Wave structure | its recent swings can be read as a completed three-part downward correction — a pullback in the A-B-C shape Elliott-wave chartists use; the labelling fails if price closes below 23.555. It is the only labelling that fits, and it describes the swings already printed, not what comes next. | possible three-wave downward correction, complete |
| Since the 50/200 cross | its 50-day average crossed below its 200-day average about 116 trading days ago — a "death cross", a bearish long-term signal | 116 sessions |
| Trend strength (14-day ADX) | there is no clear trend right now — the price is choppy (ADX, a 0–100 trend-strength gauge, is 19, below the 25 that marks a real trend), though buyers have been pushing harder than sellers lately — pressure, not a trend | 18.7 |
Momentum
3
| 14-day RSI | momentum is neutral — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 69, neither overbought (above 70) nor oversold (below 30) | 68.8 |
|---|---|---|
| Position in its 14-day range | it is trading right at the top of its 14-day range ($23.55 to $35.65) — its "stochastic" reading is 97 out of 100, where 0 would mean closing exactly at the 14-session low and 100 exactly at the high. This measures WHERE the price sits inside its recent range, which is a different question from the RSI beside it: RSI is a momentum gauge, measuring how FAST the price has been moving, so a stock can drift quietly to the bottom of its range with an ordinary RSI, or fall sharply and still sit in the middle. It has been slipping within that range over the last few sessions. | 97.4 |
| Since the MACD crossed zero | MACD, a trend-momentum gauge, turned bullish about 9 trading days ago (its momentum flipped positive) | 9 sessions |
Range
12
| 52-week high | its highest closing price over the past year (about 252 trading days) was $66.74 | $66.74 |
|---|---|---|
| From the 52-week high | it is 47.0% below its 52-week high (its highest price of the past year) | -47.0% |
| Above the 52-week low | it is 50.0% above its 52-week low (its lowest price of the past year) | +50.0% |
| Below the 52-week high | it is 47.0% below its highest point of the past year | 47.0% |
| Since a 20-day breakout | it just made a new 20-day high, its first since 2026-04-09, pushing above its recent trading range | 1 session |
| Since a 55-day breakout | it just made a new 55-day high, its first since 2026-04-09, pushing above its recent trading range | 1 session |
| All-time high | its highest closing price on record is $165.50 (set on 2023-11-14) | $165.50 |
| Given back of the 52-week move | over the past year its closes ranged ($23.77 to $64.86), and it has recovered roughly a quarter of its fall from last year’s high — 28% of it. Chart-watchers call 61.8%-65% given back the "golden pocket" — for this company that is $49.16 to $50.48. It is watched widely enough that orders cluster there, which is the honest reason it matters; it is not a forecast. | 28.2% |
| From the all-time high | it is 78.6% below its all-time high | -78.7% |
| Nearest price level | it is trading 1.5% below a resistance level at $35.86 — a price it turned at three times since 2024-09-19, most recently on 2026-05-07. Since 2024-08-26 it has 7 such levels below the current price and 6 above. Levels like these describe where the price has reversed or paused before; they are not a forecast of where it will go. | +1.5% |
| All-time low | its lowest closing price on record is $0.04667 (set on 2011-08-09) | $0.04667 |
| Above the all-time low | it is 75628.6% above its all-time low | +75,629% |
Volatility
5
| Band width vs its own 6 months | day-to-day price swings are unusually wide versus its own recent history (wider than about 88% of the past ~6 months) | 88th percentile |
|---|---|---|
| Typical daily range | in a typical session it travels about $1.73 between its high and its low — about 4.9% of its price. That is its "average true range" over the last 14 sessions, which also counts the distance from the previous close, so a day that opens well away from yesterday counts as the large move it was | $1.73 |
| Bollinger bands (20-day, ±2σ) | most of its recent trading has stayed between about $24.37 and $35.14 — the "Bollinger bands", a range drawn two standard deviations either side of its 20-day average price, which widens when the stock gets more volatile and narrows when it settles | $24.37 – $29.75 – $35.14 |
| Typical daily range (% of price) | its price moves about 4.9% in a typical session — about typical for the companies we cover. This is the average gap between a session's high and low over the last 14 sessions, counting overnight moves, expressed against the current price so it can be compared with companies trading at any price | 4.9% |
| Stretch from the 200-day average | it is trading 1.9 daily ranges below its 200-day average price (8.6% below it in plain percentage terms) — a way of asking how far it has stretched from its own average in units of how far it normally moves in a day, so a calm company and a jumpy one can be compared on the same scale | 1.9 daily ranges below its 200-day average |
Volume
1
| Volume vs its 30-day average | trading volume is about normal versus its 30-day average | 0.70× |
|---|
Analyst
2
| Change in the average price target | analysts have cut their average price target by 6.8% since the prior reading | -6.8% |
|---|---|---|
| Change in the consensus rating | the analyst consensus rating is unchanged since the prior reading | unchanged |
Candlestick patterns
1
| Since a doji | 5 sessions ago it opened and closed at almost the same price after trading through a wider range — a "doji", the classic picture of buyers and sellers finishing the session level | 5 sessions ago |
|---|
Price gaps
2
| Gap at the open | it opened on 2026-08-25 0.4% above the previous session's close — an overnight gap, the part of the move that happened while the market was shut, and traded back through that level before the close | +0.4% |
|---|---|---|
| Gap filled | a 3.1% gap down opened on 2026-08-17 has been "filled" 6 sessions ago — price traded back through the level the gap left behind, and it closed again during the very session that opened it | 6 sessions ago |
Price streaks
1
| Closing streak | it has closed higher 5 sessions in a row, a +18.19% move over the run — an unbroken run of up days, which describes what has already happened and says nothing about the next session | 5 sessions up |
|---|
Relative strength
4
| vs market, 1 month | over the past 1 month this stock beat the market by 26.7 percentage points (the stock gained 30.3% while the market gained 3.7%) | +26.7% |
|---|---|---|
| vs market, 3 months | over the past 3 months this stock beat the market by 14.6 percentage points (the stock gained 17.3% while the market gained 2.7%) | +14.6% |
| vs market, 6 months | over the past 6 months this stock lagged the market by 40.7 percentage points (the stock lost 30.2% while the market gained 10.5%) | -40.7% |
| vs market, 12 months | over the past 12 months this stock lagged the market by 60.5 percentage points (the stock lost 41.3% while the market gained 19.2%) | -60.5% |
Signal agreement
2
| Bullish technical signals | 3 of the 9 technical signals we can compute for it are currently in a bullish state: a fresh 20-day high, MACD momentum is positive, trading above the Ichimoku cloud — these describe past price behaviour, not a forecast | 3 of 9 |
|---|---|---|
| Bearish technical signals | 4 of the 9 technical signals we can compute for it are currently in a bearish state: a "death cross" — its 50-day average is below its 200-day, trading below its 200-day average, lagging the market over 6 months, near the top of its 14-day range (overbought) — these describe past price behaviour, not a forecast | 4 of 9 |
Trend (Ichimoku cloud)
1
| Vs the Ichimoku cloud | trading 12% above the Ichimoku cloud — a band drawn from where its own highs and lows sat up to 2026-07-20 and projected forward over today's price, the side traders read as an established uptrend, with the band below acting as the level that would have to give way. The band itself is moderate, spanning 3.3% of the share price. | +11.8% |
|---|
Volume-weighted price
2
| Vs this year’s average price paid | the price is 2% above the average price paid so far this year, so the typical buyer over that stretch is showing a gain. That average is $34.61 — a volume-weighted average of daily closes over 159 sessions, not a true tick-by-tick VWAP. | +2.1% |
|---|---|---|
| Vs the average paid since it last reported | the price is 23% above the average price paid since it last reported on 2026-08-06 (its 10-Q), so the typical buyer over that stretch is showing a gain. That average is $28.68 — a volume-weighted average of daily closes over 14 sessions, not a true tick-by-tick VWAP. | +23.2% |
Price levels it has turned at before
CELH last closed at $35.34 on 2026-08-25. Since 2024-08-26 it has turned at 7 prices below its last close and 6 above; the 3 nearest below and the 3 nearest above are listed, nearest first.
| Level | Side | Distance | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| $35.86 | Resistance | 1.5% above the last close | turned there three times · 2024-09-19 to 2026-05-07 |
| $34.24 | Support | 3.1% below the last close | turned there three times · 2025-02-21 to 2026-07-06 |
| $37.42 | Resistance | 5.9% above the last close | turned there twice · 2025-11-24 to 2026-04-08 |
| $33.17 | Support | 6.1% below the last close | turned there three times · 2025-04-07 to 2026-05-29 |
| $32.35 | Support | 8.5% below the last close | turned there three times · 2024-12-13 to 2026-04-21 |
| $40.23 | Resistance | 13.8% above the last close | turned there three times · 2025-05-14 to 2025-12-17 |
A level is a price this company reversed or paused at more than once — they describe past behaviour, not a forecast of where the price will go.
Wave structure
Its recent swings can be read as a three-part downward correction — the A-B-C shape chartists use for a pullback — now complete.
This labelling fails — stops being a possible reading at all — if it closes below $23.55.
It is the only labelling that fits these swings, though its proportions are not the textbook ones.
This labelling was already in place when we began recording count changes on 2026-08-13, so how long it has stood is not something we can say yet.
Read from daily closes as of 2026-08-25.
An Elliott-wave count describes the swings already printed and the level that would disprove it. It is not a forecast, a target, or advice.
Screens: Trading below the 200-day moving average · Pulled back from the 12-month high · Broke out to a new 20-day high · trendless / choppy (low ADX) · Analyst price target recently CUT · lagging the market | Learn: moving average · golden cross · adx · rsi · macd · breakout · fifty two week high low
Based on daily closing prices as of 2026-08-25. Describes past price behavior only — informational, not financial advice.
Analyst consensus
- Consensus ratingBuy (1.67 mean, 1=Strong Buy…5=Strong Sell) — 21 analysts
- Mean price target$42.05 range $26.00 – $64.00; median $41.00
Analyst estimates, as of 2026-08-26. These are third-party analyst opinions and price targets, aggregated — not a recommendation, prediction, or advice from stocks-llm. Informational only.
Analyst EPS estimate for CELH
- Consensus EPS estimate$0.3502 next reporting period, as of 2026-08-26
Change over time is not available yet: it needs two readings of the same reporting period at least 30 days apart, and we have been recording these estimates since 2026-08-04. An estimate for a DIFFERENT quarter is not a revision, so a reading from before the last report is never compared with one after it.
The consensus estimate for the next reporting period, and how it has moved between readings of that SAME period. A change is measured only between readings estimating one period — when a company reports, the consensus moves to the next quarter and the two numbers are not comparable. Informational only, not a forecast and not advice.
Key risks (from latest filing)
["High dependence on the strategic distribution partnership with PepsiCo.","Legal risks related to ongoing derivative actions and securities class action lawsuits.","Integration risks associated with the acquisitions of Alani Nu and the Rockstar energy brand."]
What changed in the latest 10-Q
AI-assisted comparison of CELH's 10-Q filed 2026-05-07 against the prior one filed 2025-11-07.
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
- Added:
- Added reference to 'Definitions of key terms can be found in the Master Glossary. Unless otherwise noted, tabular dollars are presented in thousands, except per share amounts.' in newer filing (2026-05-07)
- Added specific language about 'responsibilities under the Captaincy and the A&R Distribution Agreements' in newer filing (2026-05-07)
- Added 'potential effects of emerging climate-related disclosure laws such as California's Climate Accountability Package' in newer filing (2026-05-07)
- Added 'future tax changes under the OBBBA' in newer filing (2026-05-07)
- Added bullet point: 'Our ability to successfully integrate businesses that we may acquire, achieve the expected benefits of such acquisitions and to manage multiple brands across our product portfolio' in newer filing (2026-05-07)
- Added 'risks arising from emerging artificial intelligence-enabled threats' to cyber-security bullet in newer filing (2026-05-07)
- Added 'or any required or elective recall of our products from distribution' to FDA impact bullet in newer filing (2026-05-07)
- Added 'The potential effects of tariffs, macroeconomic instability or inflationary pressures on our supply chain, operating costs and consumer demand' as new bullet in newer filing (2026-05-07)
- Added 'Our ability to execute any share repurchase program, including the timing, amount and funding of any repurchases and the potential impact of such repurchases on our liquidity and the trading price of our Common Stock' as new bullet in newer filing (2026-05-07)
- Removed:
- Removed 'and management' from forward-looking statements opening language in newer filing (2026-05-07)
- Removed 'United States' before 'Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995' in newer filing (2026-05-07)
- Removed 'and Section 21E of the Exchange Act' reference structure (simplified to 'Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended') in newer filing (2026-05-07)
- Removed 'They inherently involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those predicted in any such forward-looking statement. Such risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to:' transition language in newer filing (2026-05-07)
- Removed bullet: 'Our ability to accurately estimate the termination fees payable to former distributors in connection with the A&R U.S. Distribution Agreement' in newer filing (2026-05-07)
- Removed bullet: 'Our ability to successfully execute our responsibilities under our Captaincy with Pepsi' in newer filing (2026-05-07)
- Removed bullet: 'The potential for brand dilution or cannibalization within Celsius's brand portfolio' in newer filing (2026-05-07)
- Removed bullet: 'Our ability to successfully integrate Alani Nu, Rockstar or other businesses that we may acquire' in newer filing (2026-05-07)
- Removed bullet: 'Our ability to achieve the benefits that we expect to realize as a result of the Alani Nu Acquisition, Rockstar Acquisition or other businesses that we may acquire' in newer filing (2026-05-07)
- Removed bullet: 'The potential negative impact that we could realize as a result of the Alani Nu Acquisition, Rockstar Acquisition or other businesses that we may acquire' in newer filing (2026-05-07)
- Removed bullet: 'Liabilities of Alani Nu, Rockstar or other businesses that we may acquire that are not known to us' in newer filing (2026-05-07)
- Removed bullet: 'Our ability to maintain strong relationships with co-packers to manufacture our products' and 'Our ability to maintain strong relationships with our customers' as separate items in newer filing (2026-05-07)
- Removed bullet: 'Our ability to successfully achieve the benefits of our acquisition of Big Beverages, a co-packer' in newer filing (2026-05-07)
- Removed 'and others' after 'social media influencers' in newer filing (2026-05-07)
- Removed 'and/or required or elective recall of our products from distribution' language structure in newer filing (2026-05-07)
- Removed 'The impact of any actions by the Federal Trade Commission on our advertising' bullet in newer filing (2026-05-07)
- Removed 'Compliance with California's climate disclosure laws may subject us to increased regulatory scrutiny, potential penalties and legal risks, which could adversely affect the our operations, financial condition and reputation' bullet in newer filing (2026-05-07)
- Reworded:
- Changed 'and management' placement and restructured opening of Cautionary Note in newer filing (2026-05-07)
- Changed 'Section 27A of the Securities Act' to match Securities Act reference format in newer filing (2026-05-07)
- Expanded forward-looking statement examples with specifics about 'Captaincy and the A&R Distribution Agreements' in opening paragraph in newer filing (2026-05-07)
- Changed 'are forward looking' to 'including statements regarding' with expanded list in newer filing (2026-05-07)
- Reworded FDA impact bullet from 'The impact of any actions by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration' to include 'required or elective recall' language in newer filing (2026-05-07)
- Changed 'The impact of any actions by any regulatory bodies on our advertising' (broader) to 'The impact of any actions by any regulatory bodies on our advertising' in newer filing (2026-05-07)
- Expanded energy drink regulation language from 'existing regulation' to 'existing and emerging regulation' and added 'climate-disclosure and environmental-reporting requirements' in newer filing (2026-05-07)
- Changed combined statement about 'Our ability to maintain strong relationships with co-packers to manufacture our products' and 'Our ability to maintain strong relationships with our customers' to single consolidated bullet in newer filing (2026-05-07)
- Changed 'Third parties attempting to create lower-cost products that attempt to replicate our product attributes' language to broader protection language in newer filing (2026-05-07)
- Notes:
- Text comparison is based on MD&A section only; full 10-Q documents may contain other changes
- Some formatting differences may affect exact string matching but substantive content compared
- Bullet point consolidation and reordering makes precise attribution complex; summary captures net additions and removals
Risk Factors
- Added:
- A&R Canada Distribution Agreement added to glossary (filed 2026-05-07)
- A&R Distribution Agreements added to glossary (filed 2026-05-07)
- Consolidated Derivative Action added to glossary (filed 2026-05-07)
- Dobler Derivative Action added to glossary (filed 2026-05-07)
- Eniva added to glossary (filed 2026-05-07)
- ESPP added to glossary (filed 2026-05-07)
- Flannery Derivative Action added to glossary (filed 2026-05-07)
- ICFR added to glossary (filed 2026-05-07)
- Murphy Derivative Action added to glossary (filed 2026-05-07)
- Original Canadian Distribution Agreement added to glossary (filed 2026-05-07)
- Original U.S. Distribution Agreement added to glossary (filed 2026-05-07)
- Redemption Price added to glossary (filed 2026-05-07)
- Regular Dividends added to glossary (filed 2026-05-07)
- Securities Class Action added to glossary (filed 2026-05-07)
- SOFR added to glossary (filed 2026-05-07)
- State Court Derivative Actions added to glossary (filed 2026-05-07)
- Stoyanoff Derivative Action added to glossary (filed 2026-05-07)
- Sunny Derivative Action added to glossary (filed 2026-05-07)
- U.S. STRIPS Rate added to glossary (filed 2026-05-07)
- Removed:
- ASC 470 removed from glossary (was in 2025-11-07 filing)
- ASC 480 removed from glossary (was in 2025-11-07 filing)
- ASC 820 removed from glossary (was in 2025-11-07 filing)
- First Refinancing Amendment definition changed - date specification added in newer version
- Reworded:
- A&R U.S. Distribution Agreement definition expanded from 'Amended and Restated U.S. Distribution Agreement' to specify 'covering the U.S. (excluding Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands)' and added 'including Pepsi's affiliates' (filed 2026-05-07)
- Captaincy definition changed from 'Pepsi uses commercially reasonable efforts to sell and distribute the Company's products' to 'Pepsi uses commercially reasonable efforts to sell and distribute the Company's products in the U.S.' (filed 2026-05-07)
- Annual Report definition updated to reference fiscal year ended December 31, 2025 filed March 2, 2026, versus prior December 31, 2024 filed March 3, 2025 (filed 2026-05-07)
- Credit Agreement definition expanded to include 'as amended by the First Refinancing Amendment and as may be further amended, restated, supplemented or otherwise modified from time to time' (filed 2026-05-07)
- First Refinancing Amendment definition added specific date 'October 2, 2025' (filed 2026-05-07)
- Pepsi definition changed from 'PepsiCo, Inc.' to 'PepsiCo, Inc. and its subsidiaries' (filed 2026-05-07)
- Quarterly Report updated to March 31, 2026 period filed May 7, 2026 versus September 30, 2025 period filed November 7, 2025 (filed 2026-05-07)
- Rockstar definition expanded to include 'and the related brands and sub-brands' (filed 2026-05-07)
- Revolving Credit Facility definition expanded from 'The Company's revolving credit facility' to 'The Company's revolving credit facility under the Credit Agreement' (filed 2026-05-07)
- Term Loan Facility definition expanded from 'The Company's term loan facility' to 'The Company's term loan facility under the Credit Agreement' (filed 2026-05-07)
- Notes:
- Comparison limited to Master Glossary sections and table of contents; full Risk Factors section text not provided in newer filing excerpt
- Balance sheet data shown reflects different reporting periods (March 31, 2026 vs September 30, 2025) making financial comparison non-comparable
AI-assisted comparison of two SEC filing sections. It describes wording and theme changes only, makes no materiality, legal, or investment judgement, and is not financial advice. Informational only — not financial advice.
Insider activity (SEC Form 4)
No open-market insider purchases or sales recorded in the last 90 days.
- Last 180 days3 buys ($716358) · 0 sells — 3 buying insiders
Cluster buying: 3 different insiders reported open-market purchases (SEC code P) of CELH within a 30-day window between 2026-05-21 and 2026-05-22. Disclosed Form 4 activity, not a prediction of performance or a buy signal.
Most recent open-market transaction: 2026-05-22. As of 2026-08-26.
View full insider trading history → View SEC Form 3/4/5 filingsAsk about CELH's insider activity →
Only open-market purchases (SEC code P) and sales (code S) are counted here. Option exercises, vesting/awards, gifts, and shares withheld for taxes are excluded — they are compensation or mechanical, not open-market conviction. Sales may be planned and non-discretionary (e.g. a Rule 10b5-1 plan) and are not necessarily bearish; open-market buying is not a recommendation to buy. Informational only — not financial advice.
Congressional trading disclosures
U.S. House members publicly disclose their own, their spouse's, and dependent children's stock transactions under the STOCK Act. We hold 1 matched disclosure for CELH from U.S. House Clerk Periodic Transaction Report filings.
Congressional trading disclosures →Institutional ownership (13F)
5 institutional 13F filers reported holding CELH as of 2026-03-31 (quarter-end position, filed within 45 days).
- Distinct 13F filers 5
- Reported shares held 29,853,872
- Reported value $1,059,215,396
reported quarterly holdings change (2025-12-31 → 2026-03-31): 0 new, 3 increased, 2 decreased, 1 exited. Change counts cover only managers that filed 13F reports in BOTH quarters, derived between two quarter-end snapshots — not same-day trades; a single manager is never said to have "bought" or "sold".
Institutional holdings are quarter-end long positions reported on SEC Form 13F-HR, filed up to 45 days after the quarter ends — they are delayed, are not real-time trades, exclude short positions and most non-US securities, and are not investment advice. Any increase/decrease is a reported change between two quarterly snapshots, not a same-day purchase or sale. These are quarter-end snapshots from the 13F filings on SEC EDGAR, filed within 45 days — not real-time, and any change is a difference between two quarterly reports, not a same-day trade. Informational only — not financial advice.
Short interest (FINRA)
CELH had 34,398,398 shares of reported short interest as of the 2026-07-31 FINRA settlement date (delayed, bi-monthly; not real-time).
CELH had 13.6% of its shares outstanding sold short as of the 2026-07-31 FINRA settlement date (percent of FLOAT would be higher — float is not disclosed in the source). FINRA reported 4.38 days to cover at the same settlement.
- Reported short interest (shares) 34,398,398
- Short interest (% of shares outstanding) 13.6%
- Prior settlement (shares) 39,938,164
- Reported change -13.87%
- Days to cover (reported) 4.38
Reported to FINRA as of the 2026-07-31 settlement date. Short interest is reported to FINRA and published on a delayed, bi-monthly schedule (as of a settlement date, disseminated roughly eight business days later) — it is NOT real-time, does not cover every venue or all US trading, and is not a short-squeeze prediction or investment advice. Days-to-cover is the value FINRA reports; percent of float is not shown because the source file carries no share-count denominator — where a percent appears it is of shares OUTSTANDING, the larger base, and is therefore a floor on percent of float. Informational only — not financial advice.
Competitors & peers
- Monster Beverage (MNST)
- Keurig Dr Pepper (KDP)
- The Coca-Cola Company (KO)
- PepsiCo (PEP)
- Red Bull
- Vital Pharmaceuticals (Bang Energy)
AI-enriched competitor set. Linked names are companies covered by stocks-llm; other named peers are shown for reference only.
Compare CELH vs…
Celsius Holdings is found in…
Frequently asked questions
What does Celsius Holdings (CELH) do?
Celsius Holdings is a beverage company that develops, markets, and distributes functional, calorie-burning fitness drinks. Following recent acquisitions, the company also manages the Alani Nu nutrition brand and the Rockstar energy drink brand in the U.S. and Canada. The company maintains a strategic distribution partnership with PepsiCo.
What sector is Celsius Holdings (CELH) in?
Celsius Holdings (CELH) is classified in the Consumer Staples sector. Its industry is Soft Drinks & Nonalcoholic Beverages. It trades on NASDAQ.
Does CELH pay a dividend?
Yes — Celsius Holdings (CELH) pays a dividend, with an indicated yield of about 0.73% (market data, as of 2026-08-26). Informational only — not financial advice.
Who are Celsius Holdings's (CELH) competitors?
Notable peers of Celsius Holdings (CELH) include Monster Beverage, Keurig Dr Pepper, The Coca-Cola Company, PepsiCo and Red Bull. This peer set is informational only — not financial advice.
Has there been recent Congressional stock trading in CELH?
Yes — we hold 1 matched STOCK Act disclosure for CELH from U.S. House Clerk Periodic Transaction Report filings. These are legally-required disclosures (often filed 30–45 days after the trade), may belong to a U.S. House member, their spouse, or a dependent child, and are not an indicator of company performance or investment advice.
Is Celsius Holdings (CELH) overbought or oversold right now?
Celsius Holdings (CELH) is currently neither overbought nor oversold — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 69, in the neutral middle (as of 2026-08-25). RSI describes recent price momentum, not a forecast — informational only, not financial advice.
Where does stocks-llm's data on CELH come from?
Fundamentals and prices come from market data, as of 2026-08-26; company filings and profile facts come from SEC EDGAR. All figures are delayed daily-close data shown with their as-of date — informational only, not financial advice.
Fundamentals: market data, as of 2026-08-26. Filings: SEC EDGAR. Prices are delayed daily-close data.
Last updated 2026-08-25.
Informational only — NOT financial advice. All figures are delayed daily-close data from SEC EDGAR & market data, shown with their as-of date.