Skip to content

Celsius Holdings (CELH)

Consumer Staples · Soft Drinks & Nonalcoholic Beverages · NASDAQ

A high-growth functional beverage company known for its fitness-oriented drinks and expanded portfolio including Alani Nu and Rockstar energy.

What Celsius Holdings does

Celsius Holdings is a beverage company that develops, markets, and distributes functional, calorie-burning fitness drinks. Following recent acquisitions, the company also manages the Alani Nu nutrition brand and the Rockstar energy drink brand in the U.S. and Canada. The company maintains a strategic distribution partnership with PepsiCo.

Themes: functional beverages, energy drinks, fitness & wellness drinks, consumer staples

Fundamentals

  • Price$29.96 as of 2026-10-20 close
  • Market cap$7.6B as of 2026-07-31 (share count; price 2026-10-20)
  • 1-year return-53.5% 2025-10-20 close $64.45 → 2026-10-20 close $29.96
  • P/E124.83 as of 2026-10-20
  • Net margin+4.3% FY2025, SEC XBRL
  • Gross margin+50.4% FY2025, SEC XBRL
  • ROE+9.1% FY2025, SEC XBRL
  • ROIC+8.3% NOPAT / (debt + equity - cash), closing capital — 10-K FY2025 (year ended 2025-12-31)
  • Debt / equity0.56 borrowings, leases excluded / equity — 10-Q/10-K balance sheet 2026-06-30
  • Revenue growth (YoY)+85.5% FY2025, SEC XBRL
  • Revenue CAGR (3y)+56.7% SEC XBRL
  • Beta0.86 as of 2026-09-03
  • Last reported earnings2026-08-06 SEC EDGAR Form 8-K (Item 2.02)

Dividend: pays a dividend.

Ask why CELH looks like this →

How CELH compares in its sector

  • price-to-earnings ratiotop 10% 85 covered Consumer Staples peers, as of 2026-10-20
  • net profit marginmiddle range 105 covered Consumer Staples peers, as of 2026-09-03
  • operating marginmiddle range 98 covered Consumer Staples peers, as of 2026-09-03
  • gross marginmiddle range 93 covered Consumer Staples peers, as of 2026-09-03
  • return on equitymiddle range 106 covered Consumer Staples peers, as of 2026-09-03
  • 3-year revenue CAGRtop 10% 109 covered Consumer Staples peers
  • free cash flow (absolute dollars, latest fiscal year)middle range 110 covered Consumer Staples peers, as of FY2025

Position among covered Consumer Staples companies that report each metric (minimum 5 peers). A relative position within our covered catalog — not a valuation, quality, or investment judgment. A higher percentile is simply a higher value (for P/E, more expensive on earnings — never "better"). Informational only.

Ask how CELH stacks up against peers →

Quarterly results

QuarterRevenueGross profitOperating incomeNet incomeDiluted EPSOperating cash flowCapex
Q2 FY2026 2026-06-30$818M$394M$75M$55M$0.14$223M†$17M†
Q1 FY2026 2026-03-31$783M$378M$139M$110M$0.33$74M$8M
Q4 FY2025 2025-12-31$722M†$342M†$26M†$25M†$0.03†-$119M†$11M†
Q3 FY2025 2025-09-30$725M$372M-$80M-$61M-$0.27$332M†$10M†
Q2 FY2025 2025-06-30$739M$381M$143M$100M$0.33$44M†$8M†
Q1 FY2025 2025-03-31$329M$172M$52M$44M$0.15$103M$7M
Q4 FY2024 2024-12-31$332M†$167M†-$18M†-$19M†-$0.10†$76M†$5M†
Q3 FY2024 2024-09-30$266M$122M-$3M$6M$0.00$13M†$4M†

† Not filed as a discrete quarter: derived from the company's own year-to-date figures (for example the fourth quarter as the fiscal year minus the first nine months). A derived per-share figure is approximate, because the share count moves within the year.

Balance sheet at 2026-06-30

  • Cash and equivalents$631M
  • Total debt$675M borrowings only; leases excluded
  • Net debt$44M total debt − cash − short-term investments

From the company's own SEC 10-Q and 10-K filings (XBRL), re-read every week. Figures in US dollars as filed; informational only — not financial advice.

Ask how CELH's latest quarter compares →

How Celsius Holdings looks technically

Celsius Holdings (CELH) is trading 16.1% below its 200-day average, the long-term trend line — a long-term downtrend. Its 50-day average crossed below its 200-day average about 155 trading days ago — a "death cross", a bearish long-term signal. There is no clear trend right now — the price is choppy (ADX, a 0–100 trend-strength gauge, is 15, below the 25 that marks a real trend). Momentum is neutral — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 59, neither overbought (above 70) nor oversold (below 30). MACD, a trend-momentum gauge, turned bullish about 8 trading days ago (its momentum flipped positive). It just made a new 20-day high, its first since 2026-09-04, pushing above its recent trading range. It is 55.1% below its highest point of the past year.

Trend

8
Distance from the 200-dayit is trading 16.1% below its 200-day average, the long-term trend line — a long-term downtrend-16.1%
50-day moving averageits average price over the last 50 trading days — a short-term trend line — is $29.36$29.36
200-day moving averageits average price over the last 200 trading days — the long-term trend line — is $35.72$35.72
Swing structureeach recent peak has been lower than the one before it and each dip deeper — the pattern chart-watchers call a downtrend, which describes where price has already been and not where it goes nextlower highs and lower lows
Last swing turnits last significant turn was a swing low 18 calendar days ago — the swings before that are what the structure reading is measured on18 sessions
Wave structureits recent swings can be read as a completed three-part downward correction — a pullback in the A-B-C shape Elliott-wave chartists use; the labelling fails if price closes below 26.43. It is the only labelling that fits, though not with textbook proportions, and it describes the swings already printed, not what comes next.possible three-wave downward correction, complete (atypical proportions)
Since the 50/200 crossits 50-day average crossed below its 200-day average about 155 trading days ago — a "death cross", a bearish long-term signal155 sessions
Trend strength (14-day ADX)there is no clear trend right now — the price is choppy (ADX, a 0–100 trend-strength gauge, is 15, below the 25 that marks a real trend)14.5

Momentum

3
14-day RSImomentum is neutral — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 59, neither overbought (above 70) nor oversold (below 30)59.4
Position in its 14-day rangeit is trading near the top of its 14-day range ($26.43 to $30.21) — its "stochastic" reading is 93 out of 100, where 0 would mean closing exactly at the 14-session low and 100 exactly at the high. This measures WHERE the price sits inside its recent range, which is a different question from the RSI beside it: RSI is a momentum gauge, measuring how FAST the price has been moving, so a stock can drift quietly to the bottom of its range with an ordinary RSI, or fall sharply and still sit in the middle. It has been climbing within that range over the last few sessions.93.4
Since the MACD crossed zeroMACD, a trend-momentum gauge, turned bullish about 8 trading days ago (its momentum flipped positive)8 sessions

Range

12
52-week highits highest closing price over the past year (about 252 trading days) was $66.74$66.74
From the 52-week highit is 55.1% below its 52-week high (its highest price of the past year)-55.1%
Above the 52-week lowit is 27.2% above its 52-week low (its lowest price of the past year)+27.2%
Below the 52-week highit is 55.1% below its highest point of the past year55.1%
Since a 20-day breakoutit just made a new 20-day high, its first since 2026-09-04, pushing above its recent trading range1 session
Since a 55-day breakoutit made a new 55-day high about 40 trading days ago40 sessions
All-time highits highest closing price on record is $165.50 (set on 2023-11-14)$165.50
Given back of the 52-week moveover the past year its closes ranged ($23.77 to $64.86), and it has recovered roughly a quarter of its fall from last year’s high — 15% of it. Chart-watchers call 61.8%-65% given back the "golden pocket" — for this company that is $49.16 to $50.48. It is watched widely enough that orders cluster there, which is the honest reason it matters; it is not a forecast.15.1%
From the all-time highit is 81.9% below its all-time high-81.9%
Nearest price levelit is trading 0.8% below a resistance level at $30.21 — a price it turned at three times since 2025-01-07, most recently on 2026-09-22. Since 2024-10-21 it has 2 such levels below the current price and 10 above. Levels like these describe where the price has reversed or paused before; they are not a forecast of where it will go.+0.8%
All-time lowits lowest closing price on record is $0.04667 (set on 2011-08-09)$0.04667
Above the all-time lowit is 64100.0% above its all-time low+64,100%

Volatility

5
Band width vs its own 6 monthsday-to-day price swings are narrower than usual versus its own recent 6-month history (tighter than about 86% of it)14th percentile
Typical daily rangein a typical session it travels about $1.19 between its high and its low — about 4.0% of its price. That is its "average true range" over the last 14 sessions, which also counts the distance from the previous close, so a day that opens well away from yesterday counts as the large move it was$1.19
Bollinger bands (20-day, ±2σ)most of its recent trading has stayed between about $26.31 and $29.69 — the "Bollinger bands", a range drawn two standard deviations either side of its 20-day average price, which widens when the stock gets more volatile and narrows when it settles$26.31 – $28.00 – $29.69
Typical daily range (% of price)its price moves about 4.0% in a typical session — about typical for the companies we cover. This is the average gap between a session's high and low over the last 14 sessions, counting overnight moves, expressed against the current price so it can be compared with companies trading at any price4.0%
Stretch from the 200-day averageit is trading 4.9 daily ranges below its 200-day average price (16.1% below it in plain percentage terms) — a way of asking how far it has stretched from its own average in units of how far it normally moves in a day, so a calm company and a jumpy one can be compared on the same scale4.9 daily ranges below its 200-day average

Volume

1
Volume vs its 30-day averagetrading volume is about normal versus its 30-day average0.68×

Analyst

2
Change in the average price targetanalysts have cut their average price target by 0.7% since the prior reading-0.7%
Change in the consensus ratingthe analyst consensus rating is unchanged since the prior readingunchanged

Candlestick patterns

1
Since a bullish engulfing1 session ago it opened below the previous session's close and finished above that session's open — a "bullish engulfing" pair, where one up day more than undid the down day before it1 session ago

Price gaps

3
Gap at the openit opened on 2026-10-20 0.2% below the previous session's close — an overnight gap, the part of the move that happened while the market was shut, and traded back through that level before the close-0.2%
Open gapit gapped 3.8% below the previous close 37 sessions ago and has not traded back through the level it left behind at 35.23 — an "unfilled gap", which describes a price range no trade has since crossed and is not a forecast that it will be crossed-3.8%
Gap filleda 3.2% gap up opened on 2026-09-22 has been "filled" 18 sessions ago — price traded back through the level the gap left behind, and it took 2 sessions to close18 sessions ago

Price streaks

1
Closing streakit has closed higher 4 sessions in a row, a +10.27% move over the run — an unbroken run of up days, which describes what has already happened and says nothing about the next session4 sessions up

Relative strength

4
vs market, 1 monthover the past 1 month this stock beat the market by 6.0 percentage points (the stock gained 6.9% while the market gained 1.0%)+6.0%
vs market, 3 monthsover the past 3 months this stock lagged the market by 1.8 percentage points (the stock gained 1.8% while the market gained 3.6%)-1.8%
vs market, 6 monthsover the past 6 months this stock lagged the market by 19.8 percentage points (the stock lost 11.3% while the market gained 8.5%)-19.8%
vs market, 12 monthsover the past 12 months this stock lagged the market by 68.1 percentage points (the stock lost 53.5% while the market gained 14.6%)-68.1%

Signal agreement

2
Bullish technical signals3 of the 9 technical signals we can compute for it are currently in a bullish state: a fresh 20-day high, MACD momentum is positive, trading above the Ichimoku cloud — these describe past price behaviour, not a forecast3 of 9
Bearish technical signals4 of the 9 technical signals we can compute for it are currently in a bearish state: a "death cross" — its 50-day average is below its 200-day, trading below its 200-day average, lagging the market over 6 months, near the top of its 14-day range (overbought) — these describe past price behaviour, not a forecast4 of 9

Trend (Ichimoku cloud)

1
Vs the Ichimoku cloudtrading 0.4% above the Ichimoku cloud — a band drawn from where its own highs and lows sat up to 2026-09-14 and projected forward over today's price, the side traders read as an established uptrend, with the band below acting as the level that would have to give way. The band itself is thin, spanning 0.4% of the share price, which is taken to mean a barrier that gives way easily.+0.4%

Volume-weighted price

2
Vs this year’s average price paidthe price is 11% below the average price paid so far this year, so the typical buyer over that stretch is under water. That average is $33.65 — a volume-weighted average of daily closes over 198 sessions, not a true tick-by-tick VWAP.-11.0%
Vs the average paid since it last reportedthe price is 4% above the average price paid since it last reported on 2026-08-06 (its 10-Q), so the typical buyer over that stretch is showing a gain. That average is $28.77 — a volume-weighted average of daily closes over 53 sessions, not a true tick-by-tick VWAP.+4.1%

Price levels it has turned at before

CELH last closed at $29.96 on 2026-10-20. Since 2024-10-21 it has turned at 2 prices below its last close and 10 above; the 2 nearest below and the 3 nearest above are listed, nearest first.

LevelSideDistanceEvidence
$30.21Resistance0.8% above the last closeturned there three times · 2025-01-07 to 2026-09-22
$27.67Support7.6% below the last closeturned there three times · 2026-05-13 to 2026-06-25
$32.35Resistance8.0% above the last closeturned there three times · 2024-12-13 to 2026-04-21
$33.17Resistance10.7% above the last closeturned there three times · 2025-04-07 to 2026-05-29
$26.37Support12.0% below the last closeturned there five times · 2025-01-13 to 2026-10-02

A level is a price this company reversed or paused at more than once — they describe past behaviour, not a forecast of where the price will go.

Wave structure

Its recent swings can be read as a three-part downward correction — the A-B-C shape chartists use for a pullback — now complete.

This labelling fails — stops being a possible reading at all — if it closes below $26.43.

It is the only labelling that fits these swings, though its proportions are not the textbook ones.

This reading has stood for 16 trading days, since 2026-09-29.

Read from daily closes as of 2026-10-20.

An Elliott-wave count describes the swings already printed and the level that would disprove it. It is not a forecast, a target, or advice.

Based on daily closing prices as of 2026-10-20. Describes past price behavior only — informational, not financial advice.

Ask about CELH's technicals →

Analyst consensus

  • Consensus ratingBuy (1.75 mean, 1=Strong Buy…5=Strong Sell) — 21 analysts
  • Mean price target$41.43 range $26.00 – $64.00; median $40.00

Analyst estimates, as of 2026-10-21. These are third-party analyst opinions and price targets, aggregated — not a recommendation, prediction, or advice from stocks-llm. Informational only.

Analyst EPS estimate for CELH

  • Consensus EPS estimate$0.3369 next reporting period, as of 2026-10-21
  • Estimate change, 30 days-$0.01324 (-3.8%) from $0.3502, on 2026-09-16, 35-day window
  • Readings revised upward0% of 7 comparable readings

The consensus estimate for the next reporting period, and how it has moved between readings of that SAME period. A change is measured only between readings estimating one period — when a company reports, the consensus moves to the next quarter and the two numbers are not comparable. Informational only, not a forecast and not advice.

Ask how CELH's estimates have moved →

Key risks (from latest filing)

["High dependence on the strategic distribution partnership with PepsiCo.","Legal risks related to ongoing derivative actions and securities class action lawsuits.","Integration risks associated with the acquisitions of Alani Nu and the Rockstar energy brand."]

See CELH's biggest risks from its latest 10-Q →

What changed in the latest 10-Q

AI-assisted comparison of CELH's 10-Q filed 2026-08-06 against the prior one filed 2026-05-07.

Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)

  • Added:
    • Newer filing adds bullet: 'The impact of changes in inventory management practices by our customers or distributors, including inventory reductions or other inventory optimization initiatives;'
    • Newer filing adds bullet: 'Our ability to successfully develop, commercialize and time the introduction of new products and innovations, and the impact of any failure to do so on our competitive position, net sales and results of operations;'
    • Newer filing adds bullet: 'Our ability to successfully expand outside of the U.S., execute management's plans and objectives for future international operations and the impact of U.S. and international laws, including export and import controls and other risk exposure;'
    • Newer filing adds bullet: 'The outcomes of regulatory investigations, proceedings or actions by U.S. or foreign governmental authorities, including the Federal Trade Commission, state attorneys general and international regulatory bodies, and the impact of any adverse outcomes on our business, brand, results of operations and cash flows;'
    • Newer filing adds bullet: 'The impact of changes in U.S. and international tax laws and regulations on our results of operations, cash flows, and financial condition;'
    • Newer filing adds bullet: 'The impact of changes in economic conditions in the domestic and international markets in which we operate;'
    • Newer filing adds bullet: 'Our ability to meet market expectations for our financial performance, including any financial outlook or guidance we may provide, and the impact of any failure to do so on our stock price, reputation, results of operations, and cash flows;'
  • Removed:
    • Older filing identifies forward-looking statements under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, Section 27A of the Securities Act and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and reliance on safe harbor protections; newer filing omits Section 27A, Section 21E and safe harbor language.
    • Older filing includes specific examples of forward-looking matters (Alani Nu and Rockstar integration, Pepsi strategic investment and partnership, anticipated financial performance, international expansion, new products, business prospects, regulatory outcomes, market conditions, market size, macroeconomic conditions and tariffs, California's Climate Accountability Package, litigation, third-party replication, OBBBA tax changes); newer filing omits this detailed enumeration.
    • Older filing includes phrase 'including statements regarding our ability to successfully integrate Alani Nu and Rockstar...' and 'any stated or implied outcomes with regard to the foregoing, including future tax changes under the OBBBA'; newer filing omits these.
    • Older filing includes 'and similar expressions' in the forward-looking word list; newer filing omits that phrase.
    • Older filing contains bullet: 'The potential negative impact that we could realize as a result of businesses that we may acquire;' newer filing omits it.
    • Older filing contains bullet: 'Liabilities of businesses that we may acquire that are not known to us;' newer filing omits it.
    • Older filing contains bullet on third-party demand generation with wording 'and/or generate', 'third-parties', 'social media influencers and others', and 'may expose us to risk of negative publicity, litigation and/or regulatory enforcement action'; newer filing rephrases.
  • Reworded:
    • Older filing: 'are made in reliance on the safe harbor protections provided thereunder' after PSLRA citation; newer filing removes this clause.
    • Older filing: 'all statements contained in this Quarterly Report that are not clearly historical in nature are forward-looking' with the enumerated examples; newer filing states 'all statements contained in this Quarterly Report that are not clearly historical in nature are forward-looking' without the examples of integrated brands, Pepsi, etc.
    • Older filing bullet: 'Our ability to successfully estimate and/or generate demand through the use of third-parties, including celebrities, social media influencers and others, may expose us to risk of negative publicity, litigation and/or regulatory enforcement action;' changed in newer filing to: 'Our ability to successfully estimate demand and/or generate demand through the use of third parties, including celebrities and social media influencers, and the risk of negative publicity, litigation or regulatory enforcement action arising from such relationships;'
    • Older filing bullet: 'Our ability to successfully expand outside of the U.S. and the impact of U.S. and international laws, including export and import controls and other risk exposure;' changed in newer filing to: 'Our ability to successfully expand outside of the U.S., execute management's plans and objectives for future international operations and the impact of U.S. and international laws, including export and import controls and other risk exposure;'
    • Older filing bullet: 'Our ability to successfully complete or manage strategic transactions, successfully integrate and manage our acquired businesses, brands or bottling operations or successfully realize a significant portion of the anticipated benefits of our joint ventures or strategic relationships;' changed in newer filing to: 'Our ability to successfully complete or manage strategic transactions, successfully integrate and manage our acquired businesses, brands or bottling operations or successfully realize a significant portion of the anticipated benefits of our strategic transactions;'
    • Older filing bullet: 'Our ability to protect our brand, trademarks, proprietary rights and our other intellectual property, and the impact of third parties attempting to create lower-cost products that attempt to replicate our product attributes;' changed in newer filing to: 'Our ability to protect our brand, trademarks, proprietary rights and our other intellectual property, and the impact of third parties attempting to create products that attempt to replicate our product attributes;'
  • Notes:
    • Newer filing text is truncated mid-sentence at 'the risks and uncertainties disclosed or referenced in Part I,' so later portions of MD&A were not available for comparison.

AI-assisted comparison of two SEC filing sections. It describes wording and theme changes only, makes no materiality, legal, or investment judgement, and is not financial advice. Informational only — not financial advice.

Ask what changed in CELH's latest 10-Q →

Insider activity (SEC Form 4)

4 open-market purchases and 0 open-market sales by insiders in the last 90 days, of which we have read Form 4 filings through 2026-10-16. The 5 days since 2026-10-16 have not been checked yet.

  • Last 90 days · read to 2026-10-164 buys ($2M) · 0 sells — 3 buying insiders
  • Last 180 days · read to 2026-10-167 buys ($3M) · 0 sells — 4 buying insiders

Cluster buying: 3 different insiders reported open-market purchases (SEC code P) of CELH within a 30-day window between 2026-09-10 and 2026-09-15. Disclosed Form 4 activity, not a prediction of performance or a buy signal.

Activity heuristic: net buying (a transparent product heuristic from the counts above, not a prediction or advice)

Most recent open-market transaction: 2026-09-15. Based on Form 4 filings read through 2026-10-16; anything filed since is not yet included.

View full insider trading history → View SEC Form 3/4/5 filings

Ask about CELH's insider activity →

Only open-market purchases (SEC code P) and sales (code S) are counted here. Option exercises, vesting/awards, gifts, and shares withheld for taxes are excluded — they are compensation or mechanical, not open-market conviction. Sales may be planned and non-discretionary (e.g. a Rule 10b5-1 plan) and are not necessarily bearish; open-market buying is not a recommendation to buy. Informational only — not financial advice.

U.S. House trading disclosures

U.S. House members publicly disclose their own, their spouse's, and dependent children's stock transactions under the STOCK Act. We hold 1 matched disclosure for CELH from U.S. House Clerk Periodic Transaction Report filings.

U.S. House trading disclosures →

Institutional ownership (13F)

5 institutional 13F filers reported holding CELH as of 2026-06-30 (quarter-end position, filed within 45 days).

  • Distinct 13F filers 5
  • Reported shares held 40,954,113
  • Reported value $1,199,170,369

reported quarterly holdings change (2026-03-31 → 2026-06-30): 0 new, 4 increased, 1 decreased, 0 exited. Change counts cover only managers that filed 13F reports in BOTH quarters, derived between two quarter-end snapshots — not same-day trades; a single manager is never said to have "bought" or "sold".

Institutional holdings are quarter-end long positions reported on SEC Form 13F-HR, filed up to 45 days after the quarter ends — they are delayed, are not real-time trades, exclude short positions and most non-US securities, and are not investment advice. Any increase/decrease is a reported change between two quarterly snapshots, not a same-day purchase or sale. These are quarter-end snapshots from the 13F filings on SEC EDGAR, filed within 45 days — not real-time, and any change is a difference between two quarterly reports, not a same-day trade. Informational only — not financial advice.

Ask about CELH's institutional holders → See what each manager we track holds →

Short interest (FINRA)

CELH had 30,961,186 shares of reported short interest as of the 2026-09-30 FINRA settlement date (delayed, bi-monthly; not real-time).

CELH had 12.2% of its shares outstanding sold short as of the 2026-09-30 FINRA settlement date (percent of FLOAT would be higher — float is not disclosed in the source). FINRA reported 4.55 days to cover at the same settlement.

  • Reported short interest (shares) 30,961,186
  • Short interest (% of shares outstanding) 12.2%
  • Prior settlement (shares) 30,669,027
  • Reported change 0.95%
  • Days to cover (reported) 4.55

Reported to FINRA as of the 2026-09-30 settlement date. Short interest is reported to FINRA and published on a delayed, bi-monthly schedule (as of a settlement date, disseminated roughly eight business days later) — it is NOT real-time, does not cover every venue or all US trading, and is not a short-squeeze prediction or investment advice. Days-to-cover is the value FINRA reports; percent of float is not shown because the source file carries no share-count denominator — where a percent appears it is of shares OUTSTANDING, the larger base, and is therefore a floor on percent of float. Informational only — not financial advice.

Ask about CELH's short interest →

Competitors & peers

AI-enriched competitor set. Linked names are companies covered by stocks-llm; other named peers are shown for reference only.

Not quite? Describe exactly what you want →

Compare CELH vs…

Celsius Holdings is found in…

Frequently asked questions

What does Celsius Holdings (CELH) do?

Celsius Holdings is a beverage company that develops, markets, and distributes functional, calorie-burning fitness drinks. Following recent acquisitions, the company also manages the Alani Nu nutrition brand and the Rockstar energy drink brand in the U.S. and Canada. The company maintains a strategic distribution partnership with PepsiCo.

What sector is Celsius Holdings (CELH) in?

Celsius Holdings (CELH) is classified in the Consumer Staples sector. Its industry is Soft Drinks & Nonalcoholic Beverages. It trades on NASDAQ.

Does CELH pay a dividend?

Yes — Celsius Holdings (CELH) pays a dividend (market data, as of 2026-09-03). Informational only — not financial advice.

Who are Celsius Holdings's (CELH) competitors?

Notable peers of Celsius Holdings (CELH) include Monster Beverage, Keurig Dr Pepper, The Coca-Cola Company, PepsiCo and Red Bull. This peer set is informational only — not financial advice.

Has there been recent U.S. House stock trading in CELH?

Yes — we hold 1 matched STOCK Act disclosure for CELH from U.S. House Clerk Periodic Transaction Report filings. These are legally-required disclosures (often filed 30–45 days after the trade), may belong to a U.S. House member, their spouse, or a dependent child, and are not an indicator of company performance or investment advice.

Is Celsius Holdings (CELH) overbought or oversold right now?

Celsius Holdings (CELH) is currently neither overbought nor oversold — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 59, in the neutral middle (as of 2026-10-20). RSI describes recent price momentum, not a forecast — informational only, not financial advice.

Where does stocks-llm's data on CELH come from?

Fundamentals come from SEC XBRL company filings for the figures marked with a fiscal year, and market data, as of 2026-09-03 for the rest; prices are market data, as of 2026-09-03; company filings and profile facts come from SEC EDGAR. All figures are delayed daily-close data shown with their as-of date — informational only, not financial advice.

Fundamentals: SEC XBRL company filings for the figures marked with a fiscal year, and market data, as of 2026-09-03 for the rest. Filings: SEC EDGAR. Prices are delayed daily-close data.

Last updated 2026-10-20.

Informational only — NOT financial advice. All figures are delayed daily-close data from SEC EDGAR & market data, shown with their as-of date.