Cleveland-Cliffs (CLF)
Materials · Integrated Steel Producers · NYSE
Cleveland-Cliffs is a vertically integrated North American flat-rolled steel powerhouse and major iron ore pellet producer.
What Cleveland-Cliffs does
Cleveland-Cliffs is a leading North American steel producer, operating as the largest flat-rolled steel company in the region. The company utilizes a vertically integrated business model that includes mining iron ore pellets and producing finished steel products through both basic oxygen furnace (BOF) and electric arc furnace (EAF) steelmaking processes. Its products serve a diverse array of industries, with a significant emphasis on the automotive sector.
Themes: automotive supply chain, decarbonization (steel), North American manufacturing, vertical integration, ]} EOM; finish.
Fundamentals
- Price$11.27 as of 2026-08-21 close
- Market cap$6.4B as of 2026-08-21
- 1-year return+11.9% 2025-08-21 close $10.07 → 2026-08-21 close $11.27
- P/En/a negative earnings
- Net margin-4.6% as of 2026-08-24
- Gross margin-1.1% as of 2026-08-24
- ROE-15.2% as of 2026-08-24
- Debt / equity1.37 as of 2026-08-24
- Revenue growth (YoY)+4.0% as of 2026-08-24
- Revenue CAGR (3y)-6.8% SEC XBRL
- Beta2.10 as of 2026-08-24
- Last reported earnings2026-07-23 SEC EDGAR Form 8-K (Item 2.02)
Dividend: 1-year non-decreasing per-share dividend streak (SEC XBRL).
How CLF compares in its sector
- net profit marginbottom 25% 142 covered Materials peers, as of 2026-08-24
- operating marginbottom 25% 142 covered Materials peers, as of 2026-08-24
- gross marginbottom 10% 141 covered Materials peers, as of 2026-08-24
- return on equitybottom 25% 151 covered Materials peers, as of 2026-08-24
- 3-year revenue CAGRbottom 25% 127 covered Materials peers
- free cash flow (absolute dollars, latest fiscal year)bottom 10% 124 covered Materials peers, as of FY2025
Position among covered Materials companies that report each metric (minimum 5 peers). A relative position within our covered catalog — not a valuation, quality, or investment judgment. A higher percentile is simply a higher value (for P/E, more expensive on earnings — never "better"). Informational only.
Top 10 scores & list membership
CLF is not currently in any published Top 10 list. Its scores are below.
Long-term score
27.7 #960 of 987 scored · #61 of 66 in Materials
Valuation 90th (price to book 1.1) and long-term trend 27th (over the past 12 months this stock lagged the market by 8.6 percentage points); weakest is profitability (3rd, return on equity -15.2%, operating margin -4.2%).
Short-term score
43.4 #1216 of 1,704 scored · #59 of 83 in Materials
Volume and participation 60th: it gapped 3.4% above the previous close and has not traded back through the level it left behind — an "unfilled gap", which describes a price range no trade has since crossed and is not a forecast that it will be crossed; setup 49th: day-to-day price swings are unusually narrow versus its own recent history — a "Bollinger squeeze" (in the tightest 7% of the past ~6 months), which often precedes a bigger move; weakest is trend 32nd: the price is 4% below the average price paid over the period covered, so the typical buyer over that stretch is under water.
Scores as of 21 Aug 2026. Each bar is a percentile: how this company ranked against every company the score ranked, 0–100. A list is a published formula and its output, not a recommendation. Method version 2.
Dividend coverage
Not assessed — last reported dividend predates the accounts. The most recent fiscal year in which CLF reported a dividend payment is FY2020, while its reported financial statements run through FY2025. Coverage is therefore not assessed for the latest year — an FY2020 ratio would not describe CLF today.
Coverage is derived from reported SEC EDGAR XBRL figures, comparing dividends paid against net income and free cash flow for the SAME fiscal year. It is not shown here because the latest fiscal year with a reported dividend payment (FY2020) is older than the latest year of reported financial statements (FY2025), so any ratio would describe an out-of-date year. Informational only — not financial advice.
How Cleveland-Cliffs looks technically
Cleveland-Cliffs (CLF) is trading 0.7% below its 200-day average, the long-term trend line — a long-term downtrend. Its 50-day average crossed below its 200-day average about 7 trading days ago — a "death cross", a bearish long-term signal. There is no clear trend right now — the price is choppy (ADX, a 0–100 trend-strength gauge, is 19, below the 25 that marks a real trend). Momentum is neutral — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 48, neither overbought (above 70) nor oversold (below 30). MACD, a trend-momentum gauge, turned bearish about 4 trading days ago (its momentum flipped negative). It made a new 20-day low about 2 trading days ago. It is 32.5% below its highest point of the past year. Day-to-day price swings are unusually narrow versus its own recent history — a "Bollinger squeeze" (in the tightest 7% of the past ~6 months), which often precedes a bigger move.
Trend
8
| Distance from the 200-day | it is trading 0.7% below its 200-day average, the long-term trend line — a long-term downtrend | -0.7% |
|---|---|---|
| 50-day moving average | its average price over the last 50 trading days — a short-term trend line — is $11.10 | $11.10 |
| 200-day moving average | its average price over the last 200 trading days — the long-term trend line — is $11.34 | $11.34 |
| Swing structure | each recent peak has been higher than the one before it and each dip has been shallower — the pattern chart-watchers call an uptrend, which describes where price has already been and not where it goes next | higher highs and higher lows |
| Last swing turn | its last significant turn was a swing high 16 calendar days ago — the swings before that are what the structure reading is measured on | 16 sessions |
| Wave structure | its recent swings can be read as a completed three-part upward correction — a pullback in the A-B-C shape Elliott-wave chartists use; the labelling fails if price closes above 12.85. It is the only labelling that fits, though not with textbook proportions, and it describes the swings already printed, not what comes next. | possible three-wave upward correction, complete (atypical proportions) |
| Since the 50/200 cross | its 50-day average crossed below its 200-day average about 7 trading days ago — a "death cross", a bearish long-term signal | 7 sessions |
| Trend strength (14-day ADX) | there is no clear trend right now — the price is choppy (ADX, a 0–100 trend-strength gauge, is 19, below the 25 that marks a real trend) | 18.7 |
Momentum
3
| 14-day RSI | momentum is neutral — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 48, neither overbought (above 70) nor oversold (below 30) | 47.8 |
|---|---|---|
| Position in its 14-day range | it is trading in the lower half of its 14-day range ($10.42 to $12.85) — its "stochastic" reading is 35 out of 100, where 0 would mean closing exactly at the 14-session low and 100 exactly at the high. This measures WHERE the price sits inside its recent range, which is a different question from the RSI beside it: RSI is a momentum gauge, measuring how FAST the price has been moving, so a stock can drift quietly to the bottom of its range with an ordinary RSI, or fall sharply and still sit in the middle. It has been climbing within that range over the last few sessions. | 35.0 |
| Since the MACD crossed zero | MACD, a trend-momentum gauge, turned bearish about 4 trading days ago (its momentum flipped negative) | 4 sessions |
Range
12
| 52-week high | its highest closing price over the past year (about 252 trading days) was $16.70 | $16.70 |
|---|---|---|
| From the 52-week high | it is 32.5% below its 52-week high (its highest price of the past year) | -32.5% |
| Above the 52-week low | it is 45.8% above its 52-week low (its lowest price of the past year) | +45.8% |
| Below the 52-week high | it is 32.5% below its highest point of the past year | 32.5% |
| Since a 20-day breakout | it made a new 20-day low about 2 trading days ago | 2 sessions |
| Since a 55-day breakout | it made a new 55-day low about 25 trading days ago | 25 sessions |
| All-time high | its highest closing price on record is $121.95 (set on 2008-06-30) | $121.95 |
| Given back of the 52-week move | over the past year its closes ranged ($7.82 to $16.18), and it has recovered roughly a third of its fall from last year’s high — 41% of it. Chart-watchers call 61.8%-65% given back the "golden pocket" — for this company that is $12.99 to $13.25. It is watched widely enough that orders cluster there, which is the honest reason it matters; it is not a forecast. | 41.3% |
| From the all-time high | it is 90.8% below its all-time high | -90.8% |
| Nearest price level | it is trading 1.3% below a resistance level at $11.42 — a price it turned at four times since 2024-09-20, most recently on 2026-05-06. Since 2024-08-21 it has 7 such levels below the current price and 6 above. Levels like these describe where the price has reversed or paused before; they are not a forecast of where it will go. | +1.3% |
| All-time low | its lowest closing price on record is $1.20 (set on 2016-01-12) | $1.20 |
| Above the all-time low | it is 839.2% above its all-time low | +839.2% |
Volatility
5
| Band width vs its own 6 months | day-to-day price swings are unusually narrow versus its own recent history — a "Bollinger squeeze" (in the tightest 7% of the past ~6 months), which often precedes a bigger move | 7th percentile |
|---|---|---|
| Typical daily range | in a typical session it travels about $0.7173 between its high and its low — about 6.4% of its price. That is its "average true range" over the last 14 sessions, which also counts the distance from the previous close, so a day that opens well away from yesterday counts as the large move it was | $0.7173 |
| Bollinger bands (20-day, ±2σ) | most of its recent trading has stayed between about $10.87 and $12.93 — the "Bollinger bands", a range drawn two standard deviations either side of its 20-day average price, which widens when the stock gets more volatile and narrows when it settles | $10.87 – $11.90 – $12.93 |
| Typical daily range (% of price) | its price moves about 6.4% in a typical session — more volatile than most companies we cover. This is the average gap between a session's high and low over the last 14 sessions, counting overnight moves, expressed against the current price so it can be compared with companies trading at any price | 6.4% |
| Stretch from the 200-day average | it is trading 0.1 daily ranges below its 200-day average price (0.7% below it in plain percentage terms) — a way of asking how far it has stretched from its own average in units of how far it normally moves in a day, so a calm company and a jumpy one can be compared on the same scale | 0.1 daily ranges below its 200-day average |
Volume
1
| Volume vs its 30-day average | trading volume is about normal versus its 30-day average | 0.85× |
|---|
Analyst
2
| Change in the average price target | analysts' average price target is unchanged from the prior reading | 0.0% |
|---|---|---|
| Change in the consensus rating | the analyst consensus rating is unchanged since the prior reading | unchanged |
Candlestick patterns
1
| Since a bullish engulfing | 4 sessions ago it opened below the previous session's close and finished above that session's open — a "bullish engulfing" pair, where one up day more than undid the down day before it | 4 sessions ago |
|---|
Price gaps
3
| Gap at the open | it opened on 2026-08-21 3.4% above the previous session's close — an overnight gap, the part of the move that happened while the market was shut, and had not traded back through that level by the close | +3.4% |
|---|---|---|
| Open gap | it gapped 3.4% above the previous close today and has not traded back through the level it left behind at 10.74 — an "unfilled gap", which describes a price range no trade has since crossed and is not a forecast that it will be crossed | +3.4% |
| Gap filled | a 3.3% gap up opened on 2026-08-04 has been "filled" 2 sessions ago — price traded back through the level the gap left behind, and it took 11 sessions to close | 2 sessions ago |
Price streaks
1
| Closing streak | it closed higher in its latest session, after a session that did not close higher — a single up day rather than a run | 1 session up |
|---|
Relative strength
4
| vs market, 1 month | over the past 1 month this stock beat the market by 19.5 percentage points (the stock gained 21.8% while the market gained 2.3%) | +19.5% |
|---|---|---|
| vs market, 3 months | over the past 3 months this stock beat the market by 2.2 percentage points (the stock gained 5.3% while the market gained 3.1%) | +2.2% |
| vs market, 6 months | over the past 6 months this stock lagged the market by 5.2 percentage points (the stock gained 5.8% while the market gained 11.1%) | -5.2% |
| vs market, 12 months | over the past 12 months this stock lagged the market by 8.6 percentage points (the stock gained 11.9% while the market gained 20.5%) | -8.6% |
Signal agreement
2
| Bullish technical signals | 0 of the 9 technical signals we can compute for it are currently in a bullish state — these describe past price behaviour, not a forecast | 0 of 9 |
|---|---|---|
| Bearish technical signals | 5 of the 9 technical signals we can compute for it are currently in a bearish state: a "death cross" — its 50-day average is below its 200-day, trading below its 200-day average, a fresh 20-day low, MACD momentum is negative, lagging the market over 6 months — these describe past price behaviour, not a forecast | 5 of 9 |
Trend (Ichimoku cloud)
1
| Vs the Ichimoku cloud | trading inside the Ichimoku cloud — a band drawn from where its own highs and lows sat up to 2026-07-16 and projected forward over today's price, the zone traders read as unresolved — neither side has established a trend, and the band is where that gets settled. The band itself is thick, spanning 11.8% of the share price, which is taken to mean a barrier that has held for a while and takes effort to cross. | 0.0% |
|---|
Volume-weighted price
2
| Vs this year’s average price paid | the price is 1% above the average price paid so far this year, so the typical buyer over that stretch is showing a gain. That average is $11.13 — a volume-weighted average of daily closes over 157 sessions, not a true tick-by-tick VWAP. | +1.3% |
|---|---|---|
| Vs the average paid since it last reported | the price is 4% below the average price paid since it last reported on 2026-07-23 (its 10-Q), so the typical buyer over that stretch is under water. That average is $11.73 — a volume-weighted average of daily closes over 22 sessions, not a true tick-by-tick VWAP. | -3.9% |
Price levels it has turned at before
CLF last closed at $11.27 on 2026-08-21. Since 2024-08-21 it has turned at 7 prices below its last close and 6 above; the 3 nearest below and the 3 nearest above are listed, nearest first.
| Level | Side | Distance | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| $11.42 | Resistance | 1.3% above the last close | turned there four times · 2024-09-20 to 2026-05-06 |
| $10.94 | Support | 3.0% below the last close | turned there five times · 2024-11-15 to 2026-08-03 |
| $10.57 | Support | 6.2% below the last close | turned there twice · 2025-01-15 to 2025-03-14 |
| $12.20 | Resistance | 8.3% above the last close | turned there six times · 2024-09-13 to 2025-12-09 |
| $9.98 | Support | 11.5% below the last close | turned there 8 times · 2025-07-11 to 2026-07-14 |
| $13.28 | Resistance | 17.9% above the last close | turned there three times · 2024-10-02 to 2025-12-01 |
A level is a price this company reversed or paused at more than once — they describe past behaviour, not a forecast of where the price will go.
Wave structure
Its recent swings can be read as a three-part upward correction — the A-B-C shape chartists use for a pullback — now complete.
This labelling fails — stops being a possible reading at all — if it closes above $12.85.
It is the only labelling that fits these swings, though its proportions are not the textbook ones.
This labelling was already in place when we began recording count changes on 2026-08-13, so how long it has stood is not something we can say yet.
Read from daily closes as of 2026-08-21.
An Elliott-wave count describes the swings already printed and the level that would disprove it. It is not a forecast, a target, or advice.
Screens: Trading below the 200-day moving average · Recent death cross (50-day crossed below 200-day) · Pulled back from the 12-month high · Broke down to a new 20-day low · MACD just crossed bearish (12/26/9) · in a Bollinger Band volatility squeeze | Learn: moving average · golden cross · adx · rsi · macd · breakout · fifty two week high low · bollinger bands
Based on daily closing prices as of 2026-08-21. Describes past price behavior only — informational, not financial advice.
Analyst consensus
- Consensus ratingHold (2.92 mean, 1=Strong Buy…5=Strong Sell) — 10 analysts
- Mean price target$11.80 range $10.00 – $15.00; median $11.75
Analyst estimates, as of 2026-08-19. These are third-party analyst opinions and price targets, aggregated — not a recommendation, prediction, or advice from stocks-llm. Informational only.
Analyst EPS estimate for CLF
- Consensus EPS estimate$0.2064 next reporting period, as of 2026-08-19
Change over time is not available yet: it needs two readings of the same reporting period at least 30 days apart, and we have been recording these estimates since 2026-08-04. An estimate for a DIFFERENT quarter is not a revision, so a reading from before the last report is never compared with one after it.
The consensus estimate for the next reporting period, and how it has moved between readings of that SAME period. A change is measured only between readings estimating one period — when a company reports, the consensus moves to the next quarter and the two numbers are not comparable. Informational only, not a forecast and not advice.
Key risks (from latest filing)
["High debt levels and potential future debt maturity constraints","Exposure to volatile steel pricing and raw material costs","Stringent environmental regulations and potential asset retirement obligations"]
What changed in the latest 10-Q
AI-assisted comparison of CLF's 10-Q filed 2026-04-21 against the prior one filed 2025-10-22.
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
- Added:
- Added reference to reading in conjunction with 'unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements' and 'Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025' (newer filing, 2026-04-21)
- Added entire new section on economic overview covering Q1 2026 steel market conditions with HRC pricing averaged at $980 per net ton (newer filing, 2026-04-21)
- Added description of April 2026 Presidential proclamation adjusting Section 232 tariffs on steel and derivative products (newer filing, 2026-04-21)
- Added details about Canadian tariff-rate quotas implemented in second half of 2025 and expected improvement of Stelco margins (newer filing, 2026-04-21)
- Added reference to war with Iran and global tensions affecting steel costs and freight rates (newer filing, 2026-04-21)
- Added specific Q1 2026 automotive production data: 3.7 million units with 5% decrease comparison and 15.7 million unit sales rate (newer filing, 2026-04-21)
- Removed:
- Removed 'FINANCIAL SUMMARY' section with consolidated results table for three and nine months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024 (older filing, 2025-10-22)
- Removed reference to reading 'Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024' (older filing, 2025-10-22)
- Removed employment figure of 'approximately 30,000 people' and replaced with 'approximately 25,000 people' (older filing had 30,000, newer has 25,000)
- Removed discussion of Q3 2025 steel market conditions with HRC averaging $843 per net ton and details about early 2025 import anticipation (older filing, 2025-10-22)
- Removed language about 'recently implemented' tariffs and references to specific operational closures at Dearborn Works, Steelton, Conshohocken, Riverdale, Minorca, and Hibbing Taconite (older filing, 2025-10-22)
- Removed Q3 2025 automotive production data: 3.9 million units and 16.3 million unit sales rate comparisons (older filing, 2025-10-22)
- Removed discussion of busheling scrap pricing and supply tightening dynamics (older filing, 2025-10-22)
- Reworded:
- Changed 'recently implemented steel and automotive tariffs' to reference 'implemented tariffs' and 'Section 232 tariffs' with emphasis on Trump Administration's 'pro-manufacturing and America-first agenda' (2026-04-21 vs 2025-10-22)
- Changed reference from 'recently implemented tariffs' to historical focus on President Trump's 'Presidential proclamation to implement 50% tariffs' during 2025 (2026-04-21)
- Changed Canadian section from stating 'This has weakened our results' (past tense) to 'This contributed to weakened results for our Canadian operations in 2025' with forward-looking expectation of improved margins (2026-04-21 vs 2025-10-22)
- Changed language about Canadian tariffs from 'We believe it is crucial for Canada to put measures in place' to 'We expect these tariff-rate quotas to help support a healthier Canadian steel industry and allow Stelco to generate improved margins' (2026-04-21)
- Shifted tone from navigating 'volatile but improving market conditions' in Q3 2025 to stating conditions 'improved throughout the first quarter of 2026' (2026-04-21 vs 2025-10-22)
- Changed description of foreign steel producer practices from 'lack of foreign countries holding their own steel producers accountable' to emphasis on 'dumping of steel in the U.S. at below market value' (2026-04-21)
- Notes:
- Older filing text appears truncated at end ('Since 2021' and 'bolster our competitive advantage, a'); newer filing also truncated ('Since 202'); comparison limited to available text
- Comparison covers transition from Q3 2025 reporting period (older, filed 2025-10-22) to Q1 2026 reporting period (newer, filed 2026-04-21), representing different fiscal quarters
- Employment count reduction from 30,000 to 25,000 may reflect operational changes discussed in older filing but impact not explicitly stated in newer filing excerpt
Risk Factors
- Added:
- Added '2021 Equity Plan' to definitions (filed 2026-04-21)
- Added 'AI' (Artificial intelligence) to definitions (filed 2026-04-21)
- Added 'POSCO' definition to definitions section (filed 2026-04-21)
- Risk Factors section page number changed from 45 to 36 (filed 2026-04-21)
- Removed:
- Removed 'Arrangement Agreement' definition (filed 2025-10-22)
- Removed 'Stelco Acquisition' definition (filed 2025-10-22)
- Removed 'Securities Act' definition (filed 2025-10-22)
- Removed references to 'acquisition-related costs' from Adjusted EBITDA definition (filed 2026-04-21)
- Removed references to 'loss on extinguishment of debt' from Adjusted EBITDA definition (filed 2026-04-21)
- Removed references to 'arbitration decision' from Adjusted EBITDA definition (filed 2026-04-21)
- Removed references to 'severance' from Adjusted EBITDA definition (filed 2026-04-21)
- Reworded:
- Adjusted EBITDA definition changed from 'idled facilities charges' to 'idled facilities credits (charges)' (filed 2026-04-21)
- Adjusted EBITDA definition changed from 'loss on disposal of assets' to 'gain (loss) on disposal of assets' (filed 2026-04-21)
- Adjusted EBITDA definition added 'amortization of inventory step-up' (filed 2026-04-21)
- Notes:
- Financial statements shown are for different periods (March 31, 2026 vs. September 30, 2025 / December 31, 2024/2025), making direct financial comparison of balance sheet and income statement figures not directly comparable
- Older filing text appears truncated at the end of the cash flows statement
AI-assisted comparison of two SEC filing sections. It describes wording and theme changes only, makes no materiality, legal, or investment judgement, and is not financial advice. Informational only — not financial advice.
Insider activity (SEC Form 4)
0 open-market purchases and 1 open-market sale by insiders in the last 90 days.
- Last 90 days0 buys · 1 sell ($3M) — 1 selling insider
- Last 180 days0 buys · 1 sell ($3M) — 1 selling insider
Activity heuristic: net selling (a transparent product heuristic from the counts above, not a prediction or advice)
Most recent open-market transaction: 2026-06-05. As of 2026-08-24.
View full insider trading history → View SEC Form 3/4/5 filingsAsk about CLF's insider activity →
Only open-market purchases (SEC code P) and sales (code S) are counted here. Option exercises, vesting/awards, gifts, and shares withheld for taxes are excluded — they are compensation or mechanical, not open-market conviction. Sales may be planned and non-discretionary (e.g. a Rule 10b5-1 plan) and are not necessarily bearish; open-market buying is not a recommendation to buy. Informational only — not financial advice.
Institutional ownership (13F)
5 institutional 13F filers reported holding CLF as of 2026-03-31 (quarter-end position, filed within 45 days).
- Distinct 13F filers 5
- Reported shares held 107,169,523
- Reported value $905,582,472
reported quarterly holdings change (2025-12-31 → 2026-03-31): 0 new, 3 increased, 2 decreased, 1 exited. Change counts cover only managers that filed 13F reports in BOTH quarters, derived between two quarter-end snapshots — not same-day trades; a single manager is never said to have "bought" or "sold".
Institutional holdings are quarter-end long positions reported on SEC Form 13F-HR, filed up to 45 days after the quarter ends — they are delayed, are not real-time trades, exclude short positions and most non-US securities, and are not investment advice. Any increase/decrease is a reported change between two quarterly snapshots, not a same-day purchase or sale. These are quarter-end snapshots from the 13F filings on SEC EDGAR, filed within 45 days — not real-time, and any change is a difference between two quarterly reports, not a same-day trade. Informational only — not financial advice.
Short interest (FINRA)
CLF had 80,256,726 shares of reported short interest as of the 2026-07-31 FINRA settlement date (delayed, bi-monthly; not real-time).
CLF had 14.1% of its shares outstanding sold short as of the 2026-07-31 FINRA settlement date (percent of FLOAT would be higher — float is not disclosed in the source). FINRA reported 2.41 days to cover at the same settlement.
- Reported short interest (shares) 80,256,726
- Short interest (% of shares outstanding) 14.1%
- Prior settlement (shares) 83,596,285
- Reported change -3.99%
- Days to cover (reported) 2.41
Reported to FINRA as of the 2026-07-31 settlement date. Short interest is reported to FINRA and published on a delayed, bi-monthly schedule (as of a settlement date, disseminated roughly eight business days later) — it is NOT real-time, does not cover every venue or all US trading, and is not a short-squeeze prediction or investment advice. Days-to-cover is the value FINRA reports; percent of float is not shown because the source file carries no share-count denominator — where a percent appears it is of shares OUTSTANDING, the larger base, and is therefore a floor on percent of float. Informational only — not financial advice.
Competitors & peers
- Nucor (NUE)
- Steel Dynamics (STLD)
- United States Steel (X)
- ArcelorMittal (MT)
- Stelco Holdings (STLC)
- POSCO Holdings (PKX)
AI-enriched competitor set. Linked names are companies covered by stocks-llm; other named peers are shown for reference only.
Compare CLF vs…
Cleveland-Cliffs is found in…
Frequently asked questions
What does Cleveland-Cliffs (CLF) do?
Cleveland-Cliffs is a leading North American steel producer, operating as the largest flat-rolled steel company in the region. The company utilizes a vertically integrated business model that includes mining iron ore pellets and producing finished steel products through both basic oxygen furnace (BOF) and electric arc furnace (EAF) steelmaking processes. Its products serve a diverse array of industries, with a significant emphasis on the automotive sector.
What sector is Cleveland-Cliffs (CLF) in?
Cleveland-Cliffs (CLF) is classified in the Materials sector. Its industry is Integrated Steel Producers. It trades on NYSE.
Who are Cleveland-Cliffs's (CLF) competitors?
Notable peers of Cleveland-Cliffs (CLF) include Nucor, Steel Dynamics, United States Steel, ArcelorMittal and Stelco Holdings. This peer set is informational only — not financial advice.
Is Cleveland-Cliffs (CLF) overbought or oversold right now?
Cleveland-Cliffs (CLF) is currently neither overbought nor oversold — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 48, in the neutral middle (as of 2026-08-21). RSI describes recent price momentum, not a forecast — informational only, not financial advice.
Where does stocks-llm's data on CLF come from?
Fundamentals and prices come from market data, as of 2026-08-24; company filings and profile facts come from SEC EDGAR. All figures are delayed daily-close data shown with their as-of date — informational only, not financial advice.
Fundamentals: market data, as of 2026-08-24. Filings: SEC EDGAR. Prices are delayed daily-close data.
Last updated 2026-08-21.
Informational only — NOT financial advice. All figures are delayed daily-close data from SEC EDGAR & market data, shown with their as-of date.