CLEARFIELD INC (CLFD)
Information Technology · Fiber optic connectivity infrastructure · NASDAQ
Clearfield provides modular fiber connectivity and management solutions designed to streamline the deployment of high-speed broadband infrastructure.
What CLEARFIELD INC does
Clearfield, Inc. designs, manufactures, and markets fiber optic connectivity products and cabinets used to connect fiber networks in telecom, data center, and broadband infrastructure. The company produces fiber distribution enclosures, pedestals, wall-mounted cabinets, and related connectivity solutions that enable optical fiber deployment. It serves customers across service provider, data center, and enterprise network segments, and is experiencing revenue decline amid challenging market conditions and discontinued operations.
Themes: broadband infrastructure, fiber-to-the-premises (FTTP), telecommunications infrastructure
Fundamentals
- Price$27.23 as of 2026-08-24 close
- Market cap$370M as of 2026-08-24
- 1-year return-17.3% 2025-08-22 close $32.91 → 2026-08-24 close $27.23
- P/En/a negative earnings
- Net margin-6.3% as of 2026-08-24
- Gross margin+37.2% as of 2026-08-24
- ROE-3.4% as of 2026-08-24
- Debt / equity0.00 as of 2026-08-24
- Revenue growth (YoY)-23.6% as of 2026-08-24
- Revenue CAGR (3y)-17.9% SEC XBRL
- Beta1.43 as of 2026-08-24
- Last reported earnings2026-08-05 SEC EDGAR Form 8-K (Item 2.02)
How CLFD compares in its sector
- net profit marginmiddle range 405 covered Information Technology peers, as of 2026-08-24
- operating marginmiddle range 405 covered Information Technology peers, as of 2026-08-24
- gross marginmiddle range 403 covered Information Technology peers, as of 2026-08-24
- return on equitymiddle range 405 covered Information Technology peers, as of 2026-08-24
- 3-year revenue CAGRbottom 10% 386 covered Information Technology peers
- free cash flow (absolute dollars, latest fiscal year)middle range 382 covered Information Technology peers, as of FY2025
Position among covered Information Technology companies that report each metric (minimum 5 peers). A relative position within our covered catalog — not a valuation, quality, or investment judgment. A higher percentile is simply a higher value (for P/E, more expensive on earnings — never "better"). Informational only.
How CLEARFIELD INC looks technically
CLEARFIELD INC (CLFD) is trading 14.9% below its 200-day average, the long-term trend line — a long-term downtrend. Its 50-day average crossed above its 200-day average about 59 trading days ago — a "golden cross", a bullish long-term signal. A trend is forming but not yet strong — ADX, a 0–100 trend-strength gauge, is 24 (a reading of 25+ marks a strong trend). Momentum is neutral — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 39, neither overbought (above 70) nor oversold (below 30). MACD, a trend-momentum gauge, turned bullish about 9 trading days ago (its momentum flipped positive). It made a new 20-day low about 12 trading days ago. It is 47.8% below its highest point of the past year.
Trend
8
| Distance from the 200-day | it is trading 14.9% below its 200-day average, the long-term trend line — a long-term downtrend | -14.9% |
|---|---|---|
| 50-day moving average | its average price over the last 50 trading days — a short-term trend line — is $33.11 | $33.11 |
| 200-day moving average | its average price over the last 200 trading days — the long-term trend line — is $32.35 | $32.35 |
| Swing structure | each recent peak has been lower than the one before it and each dip deeper — the pattern chart-watchers call a downtrend, which describes where price has already been and not where it goes next | lower highs and lower lows |
| Last swing turn | its last significant turn was a swing low 15 calendar days ago — the swings before that are what the structure reading is measured on | 15 sessions |
| Wave structure | its recent swings can be read as a completed five-part downward sequence — the pattern Elliott-wave chartists call an impulse — which on that reading would now be due a pullback rather than more of the same; the labelling fails if price closes below 25.91. It is the only labelling that fits, though not with textbook proportions, and it describes the swings already printed, not what comes next. | possible five-wave downward sequence, complete (atypical proportions) |
| Since the 50/200 cross | its 50-day average crossed above its 200-day average about 59 trading days ago — a "golden cross", a bullish long-term signal | 59 sessions |
| Trend strength (14-day ADX) | a trend is forming but not yet strong — ADX, a 0–100 trend-strength gauge, is 24 (a reading of 25+ marks a strong trend) | 23.8 |
Momentum
3
| 14-day RSI | momentum is neutral — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 39, neither overbought (above 70) nor oversold (below 30) | 38.9 |
|---|---|---|
| Position in its 14-day range | it is trading near the bottom of its 14-day range ($25.91 to $34.40) — its "stochastic" reading is 19 out of 100, where 0 would mean closing exactly at the 14-session low and 100 exactly at the high. This measures WHERE the price sits inside its recent range, which is a different question from the RSI beside it: RSI is a momentum gauge, measuring how FAST the price has been moving, so a stock can drift quietly to the bottom of its range with an ordinary RSI, or fall sharply and still sit in the middle. It has been slipping within that range over the last few sessions. | 19.2 |
| Since the MACD crossed zero | MACD, a trend-momentum gauge, turned bullish about 9 trading days ago (its momentum flipped positive) | 9 sessions |
Range
12
| 52-week high | its highest closing price over the past year (about 252 trading days) was $52.73 | $52.73 |
|---|---|---|
| From the 52-week high | it is 47.8% below its 52-week high (its highest price of the past year) | -47.8% |
| Above the 52-week low | it is 15.9% above its 52-week low (its lowest price of the past year) | +15.9% |
| Below the 52-week high | it is 47.8% below its highest point of the past year | 47.8% |
| Since a 20-day breakout | it made a new 20-day low about 12 trading days ago | 12 sessions |
| Since a 55-day breakout | it made a new 55-day low about 12 trading days ago | 12 sessions |
| All-time high | its highest closing price on record is $134.90 (set on 2022-11-25) | $134.90 |
| Given back of the 52-week move | over the past year its closes ranged ($26.00 to $51.26), and it has given back almost all of its rise from last year’s low — 94% of it. Chart-watchers call 61.8%-65% given back the "golden pocket" — for this company that is $34.84 to $35.65. It is watched widely enough that orders cluster there, which is the honest reason it matters; it is not a forecast. | 93.9% |
| From the all-time high | it is 79.6% below its all-time high | -79.6% |
| Nearest price level | it is trading 1.6% above a support level at $27.11 — a price it turned at three times since 2024-11-19, most recently on 2026-02-05. Since 2024-08-21 it has 3 such levels below the current price and 14 above. Levels like these describe where the price has reversed or paused before; they are not a forecast of where it will go. | -1.6% |
| All-time low | its lowest closing price on record is $0.55 (set on 2008-12-02) | $0.55 |
| Above the all-time low | it is 4907.3% above its all-time low | +4,907% |
Volatility
5
| Band width vs its own 6 months | day-to-day price swings are about average versus its own recent 6-month history | 60th percentile |
|---|---|---|
| Typical daily range | in a typical session it travels about $1.87 between its high and its low — about 6.8% of its price. That is its "average true range" over the last 14 sessions, which also counts the distance from the previous close, so a day that opens well away from yesterday counts as the large move it was | $1.87 |
| Bollinger bands (20-day, ±2σ) | most of its recent trading has stayed between about $25.64 and $33.69 — the "Bollinger bands", a range drawn two standard deviations either side of its 20-day average price, which widens when the stock gets more volatile and narrows when it settles | $25.64 – $29.66 – $33.69 |
| Typical daily range (% of price) | its price moves about 6.8% in a typical session — more volatile than most companies we cover. This is the average gap between a session's high and low over the last 14 sessions, counting overnight moves, expressed against the current price so it can be compared with companies trading at any price | 6.8% |
| Stretch from the 200-day average | it is trading 2.6 daily ranges below its 200-day average price (14.9% below it in plain percentage terms) — a way of asking how far it has stretched from its own average in units of how far it normally moves in a day, so a calm company and a jumpy one can be compared on the same scale | 2.6 daily ranges below its 200-day average |
Volume
1
| Volume vs its 30-day average | trading volume is about normal versus its 30-day average | 0.58× |
|---|
Analyst
2
| Change in the average price target | analysts' average price target is unchanged from the prior reading | 0.0% |
|---|---|---|
| Change in the consensus rating | the analyst consensus rating is unchanged since the prior reading | unchanged |
Candlestick patterns
2
| Since a doji | 5 sessions ago it opened and closed at almost the same price after trading through a wider range — a "doji", the classic picture of buyers and sellers finishing the session level | 5 sessions ago |
|---|---|---|
| Since a bullish engulfing | 4 sessions ago it opened below the previous session's close and finished above that session's open — a "bullish engulfing" pair, where one up day more than undid the down day before it | 4 sessions ago |
Price gaps
3
| Gap at the open | it opened on 2026-08-21 0.9% above the previous session's close — an overnight gap, the part of the move that happened while the market was shut, and traded back through that level before the close | +0.9% |
|---|---|---|
| Open gap | it gapped 3.8% above the previous close 10 sessions ago and has not traded back through the level it left behind at 26.66 — an "unfilled gap", which describes a price range no trade has since crossed and is not a forecast that it will be crossed | +3.8% |
| Gap filled | a 3.2% gap up opened on 2026-08-04 has been "filled" 11 sessions ago — price traded back through the level the gap left behind, and it took 2 sessions to close | 11 sessions ago |
Relative strength
4
| vs market, 1 month | over the past 1 month this stock lagged the market by 16.3 percentage points (the stock lost 14.0% while the market gained 2.3%) | -16.3% |
|---|---|---|
| vs market, 3 months | over the past 3 months this stock lagged the market by 38.7 percentage points (the stock lost 35.6% while the market gained 3.1%) | -38.7% |
| vs market, 6 months | over the past 6 months this stock lagged the market by 26.4 percentage points (the stock lost 15.3% while the market gained 11.1%) | -26.4% |
| vs market, 12 months | over the past 12 months this stock lagged the market by 32.3 percentage points (the stock lost 11.8% while the market gained 20.5%) | -32.3% |
Signal agreement
2
| Bullish technical signals | 3 of the 9 technical signals we can compute for it are currently in a bullish state: a "golden cross" — its 50-day average is above its 200-day, MACD momentum is positive, near the bottom of its 14-day range (oversold) — these describe past price behaviour, not a forecast | 3 of 9 |
|---|---|---|
| Bearish technical signals | 3 of the 9 technical signals we can compute for it are currently in a bearish state: trading below its 200-day average, lagging the market over 6 months, trading below the Ichimoku cloud — these describe past price behaviour, not a forecast | 3 of 9 |
Trend (Ichimoku cloud)
1
| Vs the Ichimoku cloud | trading 23% below the Ichimoku cloud — a band drawn from where its own highs and lows sat up to 2026-07-16 and projected forward over today's price, the side traders read as an established downtrend, with the band above acting as the level that would have to be cleared. The band itself is thick, spanning 12.5% of the share price, which is taken to mean a barrier that has held for a while and takes effort to cross. | -22.9% |
|---|
Volume-weighted price
2
| Vs this year’s average price paid | the price is 23% below the average price paid so far this year, so the typical buyer over that stretch is under water. That average is $35.64 — a volume-weighted average of daily closes over 157 sessions, not a true tick-by-tick VWAP. | -22.7% |
|---|---|---|
| Vs the average paid since it last reported | the price is 3% below the average price paid since it last reported on 2026-08-05 (its 8-K), so the typical buyer over that stretch is under water. That average is $28.53 — a volume-weighted average of daily closes over 13 sessions, not a true tick-by-tick VWAP. | -3.5% |
Price levels it has turned at before
CLFD last closed at $27.54 on 2026-08-21. Since 2024-08-21 it has turned at 3 prices below its last close and 14 above; the 3 nearest below and the 3 nearest above are listed, nearest first.
| Level | Side | Distance | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| $27.11 | Support | 1.6% below the last close | turned there three times · 2024-11-19 to 2026-02-05 |
| $28.44 | Resistance | 3.3% above the last close | turned there twice · 2025-12-19 to 2026-07-29 |
| $25.75 | Support | 6.5% below the last close | turned there twice · 2026-04-29 to 2026-08-06 |
| $29.48 | Resistance | 7.0% above the last close | turned there five times · 2024-12-05 to 2026-07-17 |
| $30.29 | Resistance | 10.0% above the last close | turned there twice · 2025-08-15 to 2026-03-24 |
| $23.77 | Support | 13.7% below the last close | turned there twice · 2025-04-07 to 2026-03-31 |
A level is a price this company reversed or paused at more than once — they describe past behaviour, not a forecast of where the price will go.
Wave structure
Its recent swings can be read as a five-part downward sequence — what Elliott-wave chartists call an impulse — now complete.
This labelling fails — stops being a possible reading at all — if it closes below $25.91.
It is the only labelling that fits these swings, though its proportions are not the textbook ones. It was chosen from 3 labellings that survived the rules, counting shorter readings of the same bars.
This labelling was already in place when we began recording count changes on 2026-08-13, so how long it has stood is not something we can say yet.
Read from daily closes as of 2026-08-21.
An Elliott-wave count describes the swings already printed and the level that would disprove it. It is not a forecast, a target, or advice.
Screens: Trading below the 200-day moving average · Pulled back from the 12-month high · lagging the market · Most volatile (6%+ typical daily range) · At the bottom of its 14-day range (stochastic below 20) · Under water since its last earnings report (below the anchored VWAP) | Learn: moving average · golden cross · adx · rsi · macd · breakout · fifty two week high low
Based on daily closing prices as of 2026-08-21. Describes past price behavior only — informational, not financial advice.
Analyst consensus
- Consensus ratingStrong Buy (1.25 mean, 1=Strong Buy…5=Strong Sell) — 4 analysts
- Mean price target$40.25 range $38.00 – $45.00; median $39.00
Analyst estimates, as of 2026-08-19. These are third-party analyst opinions and price targets, aggregated — not a recommendation, prediction, or advice from stocks-llm. Informational only.
Analyst EPS estimate for CLFD
- Consensus EPS estimate$0.095 next reporting period, as of 2026-08-19
Change over time is not available yet: it needs two readings of the same reporting period at least 30 days apart, and we have been recording these estimates since 2026-08-04. An estimate for a DIFFERENT quarter is not a revision, so a reading from before the last report is never compared with one after it.
The consensus estimate for the next reporting period, and how it has moved between readings of that SAME period. A change is measured only between readings estimating one period — when a company reports, the consensus moves to the next quarter and the two numbers are not comparable. Informational only, not a forecast and not advice.
Key risks (from latest filing)
["significant revenue decline and recent net losses","sensitivity to fiber deployment capital expenditure cycles of communication service providers","intense competition in the fiber connectivity and management market"]
What changed in the latest 10-Q
AI-assisted comparison of CLFD's 10-Q filed 2026-05-07 against the prior one filed 2026-02-09.
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
- Added:
- Newer filing (2026-05-07) specifies comparison periods as 'three and six months ended March 31, 2026, and 2025' whereas older filing compares 'three months ended December 31, 2025, and 2024'
- Newer filing adds narrative: 'Our products speed up the time to revenue for our service provider customers in Multiple Dwelling Units (MDUs) and Multiple Tenant Units (MTUs) by reducing the amount of labor and materials needed to provide gigabit broadband service' with explicit mention of 'broadband service'
- Newer filing adds narrative: 'Our products help make our customers' business services more profitable through faster building access, easier reconfiguration, and quicker services turn-up' with explicit mention of 'our customers' business services'
- Newer filing includes specific Q1 2026 financial results: net sales of $34,391,000, Broadband Service Provider sales of $16,461,000, international sales of $499,000, Legacy customer sales of $0
- Newer filing reports order backlog of $31,647,000 as of March 31, 2026, up 39% from December 31, 2025 backlog of $22,763,000
- Newer filing reports gross profit of $11,161,000 (32.5% margin) for Q1 2026 versus $13,961,000 (34.4% margin) in Q1 2025
- Newer filing reports loss from continuing operations of $2,069,000 for Q1 2026 versus income of $1,682,000 for Q1 2025
- Newer filing states net investment income of $1,365,000 for Q1 2026 versus $1,588,000 for Q1 2025
- Newer filing reports income tax benefit of $176,000 with 25.0% tax rate for Q1 2026 versus expense of $722,000 with 22.1% rate for Q1 2025
- Removed:
- Older filing (2026-02-09) included detailed Q4 2025 results comparing to Q4 2024: net sales of $34,341,000 (increase of 16% or $4,643,000)
- Older filing reported order backlog of $22,763,000 as of December 31, 2025, down 8% from September 30, 2025
- Older filing reported gross profit of $11,388,000 (33.2% margin) for Q4 2025 versus $8,675,000 (29.2% margin) in Q4 2024
- Older filing reported loss from continuing operations of $1,824,000 for Q4 2025 versus loss of $2,046,000 for Q4 2024
- Older filing detailed cost of sales improvement including 'lower excess inventory charges in the continuing operations or Clearfield segment of $1,592,000, which resulted in a benefit to cost of goods sold of $695,000 in the current quarter'
- Older filing reported net investment income of $1,546,000 for Q4 2025 versus $1,744,000 for Q4 2024
- Older filing reported income tax benefit of $1,000 with 0.4% tax rate for Q4 2025 versus expense of $53,000 with (17.6%) rate for Q4 2024
- Reworded:
- Older filing states 'Our products speed up the time to revenue for our service provider customers in Multiple Dwelling Units (MDUs) and Multiple Tenant Units (MTUs) by reducing the amount of labor and materials needed to provide gigabit service' changed to 'gigabit broadband service' in newer filing
- Older filing states 'Our products help make business services more profitable through faster building access, easier reconfiguration, and quicker services turn-up' changed to 'Our products help make our customers' business services more profitable...' in newer filing
- Notes:
- The two filings compare different fiscal quarters (Q4 2025 vs. prior year in older filing; Q1 2026 vs. prior year in newer filing), making direct operational comparisons between the two MD&A sections not directly comparable
- Text in both documents appears truncated at the end of the provided excerpts
Risk Factors
- Added:
- Newer filing (2026-05-07) presents financial statements for six-month period ended March 31, 2026, compared to older filing (2026-02-09) which presented three-month period ended December 31, 2025
- Newer filing includes condensed consolidated statements of earnings for six months ended March 31, 2026 and March 31, 2025
- Newer filing includes condensed consolidated statements of comprehensive (loss) income for six months ended March 31, 2026 and March 31, 2025
- Newer filing includes condensed consolidated statements of shareholders' equity for six months ended March 31, 2026 and March 31, 2025
- Balance sheet date in newer filing is March 31, 2026 (unaudited) versus December 31, 2025 (unaudited) in older filing
- Removed:
- Older filing's three-month period ended December 31, 2025 statements of earnings removed
- Older filing's three-month period ended December 31, 2025 statements of comprehensive loss removed
- Older filing's three-month period ended December 31, 2024 comparison data removed
- Older filing's condensed consolidated statements of cash flows for three months ended December 31, 2025 and 2024 removed
- Reworded:
- Statements of earnings changed from three-month comparison format (December 31, 2025 vs 2024) to six-month and three-month comparison formats (March 31, 2026 vs 2025)
- Comprehensive income statements changed from three-month comparison (December 31, 2025 vs 2024) to six-month and three-month comparison (March 31, 2026 vs 2025)
- Shareholders' equity statements changed from single three-month period (December 31, 2025) to include both three-month and six-month periods ended March 31, 2026
- Notes:
- Financial data presented reflects different reporting periods (Q1 2026 with YTD six-month data vs Q1 2025 prior year) making direct numerical comparisons between filings reflective of time period differences rather than company performance changes
- Balance sheet comparison is between March 31, 2026 and September 30, 2025 in newer filing versus December 31, 2025 and September 30, 2025 in older filing
AI-assisted comparison of two SEC filing sections. It describes wording and theme changes only, makes no materiality, legal, or investment judgement, and is not financial advice. Informational only — not financial advice.
Insider activity (SEC Form 4)
0 open-market purchases and 3 open-market sales by insiders in the last 90 days.
- Last 90 days0 buys · 3 sells ($490318) — 2 selling insiders
- Last 180 days0 buys · 7 sells ($1M) — 3 selling insiders
Activity heuristic: net selling (a transparent product heuristic from the counts above, not a prediction or advice)
Most recent open-market transaction: 2026-07-01. As of 2026-08-25.
View full insider trading history → View SEC Form 3/4/5 filingsAsk about CLFD's insider activity →
Only open-market purchases (SEC code P) and sales (code S) are counted here. Option exercises, vesting/awards, gifts, and shares withheld for taxes are excluded — they are compensation or mechanical, not open-market conviction. Sales may be planned and non-discretionary (e.g. a Rule 10b5-1 plan) and are not necessarily bearish; open-market buying is not a recommendation to buy. Informational only — not financial advice.
Institutional ownership (13F)
5 institutional 13F filers reported holding CLFD as of 2026-03-31 (quarter-end position, filed within 45 days).
- Distinct 13F filers 5
- Reported shares held 1,673,333
- Reported value $44,293,125
reported quarterly holdings change (2025-12-31 → 2026-03-31): 0 new, 3 increased, 2 decreased, 0 exited. Change counts cover only managers that filed 13F reports in BOTH quarters, derived between two quarter-end snapshots — not same-day trades; a single manager is never said to have "bought" or "sold".
Institutional holdings are quarter-end long positions reported on SEC Form 13F-HR, filed up to 45 days after the quarter ends — they are delayed, are not real-time trades, exclude short positions and most non-US securities, and are not investment advice. Any increase/decrease is a reported change between two quarterly snapshots, not a same-day purchase or sale. These are quarter-end snapshots from the 13F filings on SEC EDGAR, filed within 45 days — not real-time, and any change is a difference between two quarterly reports, not a same-day trade. Informational only — not financial advice.
Short interest (FINRA)
CLFD had 1,294,290 shares of reported short interest as of the 2026-07-31 FINRA settlement date (delayed, bi-monthly; not real-time).
CLFD had 9.53% of its shares outstanding sold short as of the 2026-07-31 FINRA settlement date (percent of FLOAT would be higher — float is not disclosed in the source). FINRA reported 6.39 days to cover at the same settlement.
- Reported short interest (shares) 1,294,290
- Short interest (% of shares outstanding) 9.53%
- Prior settlement (shares) 1,482,622
- Reported change -12.7%
- Days to cover (reported) 6.39
Reported to FINRA as of the 2026-07-31 settlement date. Short interest is reported to FINRA and published on a delayed, bi-monthly schedule (as of a settlement date, disseminated roughly eight business days later) — it is NOT real-time, does not cover every venue or all US trading, and is not a short-squeeze prediction or investment advice. Days-to-cover is the value FINRA reports; percent of float is not shown because the source file carries no share-count denominator — where a percent appears it is of shares OUTSTANDING, the larger base, and is therefore a floor on percent of float. Informational only — not financial advice.
Competitors & peers
- CommScope (COMM)
- Corning (GLW)
- Amphenol (APH)
- Hubbell (HUBB)
- Preformed Line Products (PLPC)
AI-enriched competitor set. Linked names are companies covered by stocks-llm; other named peers are shown for reference only.
Compare CLFD vs…
CLEARFIELD INC is found in…
Frequently asked questions
What does CLEARFIELD INC (CLFD) do?
Clearfield, Inc. designs, manufactures, and markets fiber optic connectivity products and cabinets used to connect fiber networks in telecom, data center, and broadband infrastructure. The company produces fiber distribution enclosures, pedestals, wall-mounted cabinets, and related connectivity solutions that enable optical fiber deployment.
What sector is CLEARFIELD INC (CLFD) in?
CLEARFIELD INC (CLFD) is classified in the Information Technology sector. Its industry is Fiber optic connectivity infrastructure. It trades on NASDAQ.
Who are CLEARFIELD INC's (CLFD) competitors?
Notable peers of CLEARFIELD INC (CLFD) include CommScope, Corning, Amphenol, Hubbell and Preformed Line Products. This peer set is informational only — not financial advice.
Is CLEARFIELD INC (CLFD) overbought or oversold right now?
CLEARFIELD INC (CLFD) is currently neither overbought nor oversold — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 39, in the neutral middle (as of 2026-08-21). RSI describes recent price momentum, not a forecast — informational only, not financial advice.
Where does stocks-llm's data on CLFD come from?
Fundamentals and prices come from market data, as of 2026-08-24; company filings and profile facts come from SEC EDGAR. All figures are delayed daily-close data shown with their as-of date — informational only, not financial advice.
Fundamentals: market data, as of 2026-08-24. Filings: SEC EDGAR. Prices are delayed daily-close data.
Last updated 2026-08-24.
Informational only — NOT financial advice. All figures are delayed daily-close data from SEC EDGAR & market data, shown with their as-of date.