Skip to content

DocuSign (DOCU)

Information Technology · Agreement management and contract lifecycle software · NASDAQ

DocuSign is the world's leading AI-powered agreement management platform, enabling organizations to digitally sign, manage, and extract insights from contracts across all business functions.

What DocuSign does

DocuSign develops a cloud-based Intelligent Agreement Management (IAM) platform that enables organizations to manage agreements across their entire business, with core offerings including the world's leading e-signature solution and contract lifecycle management (CLM) capabilities. The company generates 98% of revenue from subscription-based access to these products, serving over 1.8 million customers across virtually all industries, ranging from small and medium-sized businesses to global enterprises with no significant customer concentration.

Themes: Agreement management / contract lifecycle, E-signature / digital signing, AI-powered business workflows, Enterprise automation, Document management and analytics

Fundamentals

  • Price$62.00 as of 2026-08-21 close
  • Market cap$11.8B as of 2026-08-21
  • 1-year return-12.4% 2025-08-21 close $70.74 → 2026-08-21 close $62.00
  • P/E35.66 as of 2026-08-24
  • Net margin+9.6% as of 2026-08-24
  • Gross margin+79.4% as of 2026-08-24
  • ROE+16.4% as of 2026-08-24
  • Debt / equity0.00 as of 2026-08-24
  • Revenue growth (YoY)+8.4% as of 2026-08-24
  • Revenue CAGR (3y)+8.6% SEC XBRL
  • Beta0.87 as of 2026-08-24
  • Last reported earnings2026-06-04 SEC EDGAR Form 8-K (Item 2.02)

Ask why DOCU looks like this →

How DOCU compares in its sector

  • price-to-earnings ratiomiddle range 265 covered Information Technology peers, as of 2026-08-24
  • net profit marginmiddle range 405 covered Information Technology peers, as of 2026-08-24
  • operating marginmiddle range 405 covered Information Technology peers, as of 2026-08-24
  • gross margintop 25% 403 covered Information Technology peers, as of 2026-08-24
  • return on equitymiddle range 405 covered Information Technology peers, as of 2026-08-24
  • 3-year revenue CAGRmiddle range 386 covered Information Technology peers
  • free cash flow (absolute dollars, latest fiscal year)top 25% 382 covered Information Technology peers, as of FY2026

Position among covered Information Technology companies that report each metric (minimum 5 peers). A relative position within our covered catalog — not a valuation, quality, or investment judgment. A higher percentile is simply a higher value (for P/E, more expensive on earnings — never "better"). Informational only.

Ask how DOCU stacks up against peers →

Top 10 scores & list membership

DOCU is not currently in any published Top 10 list. Its scores are below.

Long-term score

Not scored for the long-term list: no shareholder return data.

Short-term score

61.8 #138 of 1,704 scored · #21 of 261 in Information Technology

  • Trend73.1
  • Momentum71.0
  • Setup58.3
  • Volume and participation34.7
  • Catalysts62.2

Trend 73rd: the price is 24% above the average price paid over the period covered, so the typical buyer over that stretch is showing a gain; momentum 71st: MACD momentum is positive; weakest is volume and participation 35th: trading volume is about normal versus its 30-day average.

Scores as of 21 Aug 2026. Each bar is a percentile: how this company ranked against every company the score ranked, 0–100. A list is a published formula and its output, not a recommendation. Method version 2.

How DocuSign looks technically

DocuSign (DOCU) is trading 13.8% above its 200-day average, the long-term trend line — a longer-term uptrend. Its 50-day average crossed below its 200-day average about 275 trading days ago — a "death cross", a bearish long-term signal. A strong uptrend is in place — ADX, a 0–100 trend-strength gauge, is 26, with buyers in control. Momentum is neutral — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 62, neither overbought (above 70) nor oversold (below 30). It made a new 20-day high about 7 trading days ago. It is 28.4% below its highest point of the past year.

Trend

9
Distance from the 200-dayit is trading 13.8% above its 200-day average, the long-term trend line — a longer-term uptrend+13.8%
50-day moving averageits average price over the last 50 trading days — a short-term trend line — is $51.60$51.60
200-day moving averageits average price over the last 200 trading days — the long-term trend line — is $54.49$54.49
Swing structureeach recent peak has been higher than the one before it and each dip has been shallower — the pattern chart-watchers call an uptrend, which describes where price has already been and not where it goes nexthigher highs and higher lows
Last swing turnits last significant turn was a swing high 7 calendar days ago — the swings before that are what the structure reading is measured on7 sessions
Wave structureits recent swings can be read as a five-part upward sequence — what Elliott-wave chartists call an impulse — now in the fourth leg, a pullback against that upward direction; the labelling fails if price closes below 54.5. It is one of several labellings that fit, and it describes the swings already printed, not what comes next. The same swings also read as a completed three-part correction.possible upward five-wave sequence, in wave 4 (one of several readings)
Since the 50/200 crossits 50-day average crossed below its 200-day average about 275 trading days ago — a "death cross", a bearish long-term signal275 sessions
Above the 200-day after a dipit recently dipped to its 200-day average (the long-term trend line) and has since climbed back above it — now about 13.8% above+13.8%
Trend strength (14-day ADX)a strong uptrend is in place — ADX, a 0–100 trend-strength gauge, is 26, with buyers in control26.3

Momentum

3
14-day RSImomentum is neutral — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 62, neither overbought (above 70) nor oversold (below 30)62.4
Position in its 14-day rangeit is trading in the upper half of its 14-day range ($54.26 to $65.25) — its "stochastic" reading is 70 out of 100, where 0 would mean closing exactly at the 14-session low and 100 exactly at the high. This measures WHERE the price sits inside its recent range, which is a different question from the RSI beside it: RSI is a momentum gauge, measuring how FAST the price has been moving, so a stock can drift quietly to the bottom of its range with an ordinary RSI, or fall sharply and still sit in the middle. It has been slipping within that range over the last few sessions.70.4
Since the MACD crossed zeroMACD, a trend-momentum gauge, is in positive territory (momentum leaning bullish)20 sessions

Range

12
52-week highits highest closing price over the past year (about 252 trading days) was $86.65$86.65
From the 52-week highit is 28.4% below its 52-week high (its highest price of the past year)-28.4%
Above the 52-week lowit is 54.4% above its 52-week low (its lowest price of the past year)+54.4%
Below the 52-week highit is 28.4% below its highest point of the past year28.4%
Since a 20-day breakoutit made a new 20-day high about 7 trading days ago7 sessions
Since a 55-day breakoutit made a new 55-day high about 7 trading days ago7 sessions
All-time highits highest closing price on record is $314.76 (set on 2021-08-10)$314.76
Given back of the 52-week moveover the past year its closes ranged ($41.75 to $85.01), and it has recovered around half of its fall from last year’s high — 47% of it. Chart-watchers call 61.8%-65% given back the "golden pocket" — for this company that is $68.48 to $69.87. It is watched widely enough that orders cluster there, which is the honest reason it matters; it is not a forecast.46.8%
From the all-time highit is 80.3% below its all-time high-80.3%
Nearest price levelit is trading 2.5% below a resistance level at $63.58 — a price it turned at four times since 2024-09-26, most recently on 2026-01-06. Since 2024-08-21 it has 7 such levels below the current price and 11 above. Levels like these describe where the price has reversed or paused before; they are not a forecast of where it will go.+2.5%
All-time lowits lowest closing price on record is $35.06 (set on 2018-11-20)$35.06
Above the all-time lowit is 76.8% above its all-time low+76.8%

Volatility

5
Band width vs its own 6 monthsday-to-day price swings are about average versus its own recent 6-month history52nd percentile
Typical daily rangein a typical session it travels about $2.68 between its high and its low — about 4.3% of its price. That is its "average true range" over the last 14 sessions, which also counts the distance from the previous close, so a day that opens well away from yesterday counts as the large move it was$2.68
Bollinger bands (20-day, ±2σ)most of its recent trading has stayed between about $52.70 and $64.60 — the "Bollinger bands", a range drawn two standard deviations either side of its 20-day average price, which widens when the stock gets more volatile and narrows when it settles$52.70 – $58.65 – $64.60
Typical daily range (% of price)its price moves about 4.3% in a typical session — about typical for the companies we cover. This is the average gap between a session's high and low over the last 14 sessions, counting overnight moves, expressed against the current price so it can be compared with companies trading at any price4.3%
Stretch from the 200-day averageit is trading 2.8 daily ranges above its 200-day average price (13.8% above it in plain percentage terms) — a way of asking how far it has stretched from its own average in units of how far it normally moves in a day, so a calm company and a jumpy one can be compared on the same scale2.8 daily ranges above its 200-day average

Volume

1
Volume vs its 30-day averagetrading volume is about normal versus its 30-day average0.59×

Analyst

2
Change in the average price targetanalysts' average price target is unchanged from the prior reading0.0%
Change in the consensus ratingthe analyst consensus rating is unchanged since the prior readingunchanged

Candlestick patterns

1
Since a bullish engulfing2 sessions ago it opened below the previous session's close and finished above that session's open — a "bullish engulfing" pair, where one up day more than undid the down day before it2 sessions ago

Price gaps

3
Gap at the openit opened on 2026-08-21 0.8% below the previous session's close — an overnight gap, the part of the move that happened while the market was shut, and traded back through that level before the close-0.8%
Open gapit gapped 2.6% above the previous close 19 sessions ago and has not traded back through the level it left behind at 50.44 — an "unfilled gap", which describes a price range no trade has since crossed and is not a forecast that it will be crossed+2.6%
Gap filleda 2.6% gap down opened on 2026-08-06 has been "filled" 10 sessions ago — price traded back through the level the gap left behind, and it took 1 session to close10 sessions ago

Price streaks

1
Closing streakit closed lower in its latest session, after a session that did not close lower — a single down day rather than a run1 session down

Relative strength

4
vs market, 1 monthover the past 1 month this stock beat the market by 19.9 percentage points (the stock gained 22.2% while the market gained 2.3%)+19.9%
vs market, 3 monthsover the past 3 months this stock beat the market by 23.5 percentage points (the stock gained 26.6% while the market gained 3.1%)+23.5%
vs market, 6 monthsover the past 6 months this stock beat the market by 28.3 percentage points (the stock gained 39.4% while the market gained 11.1%)+28.3%
vs market, 12 monthsover the past 12 months this stock lagged the market by 32.8 percentage points (the stock lost 12.4% while the market gained 20.5%)-32.8%

Signal agreement

2
Bullish technical signals5 of the 9 technical signals we can compute for it are currently in a bullish state: a strong uptrend, with buyers in control, trading above its 200-day average, MACD momentum is positive, outperforming the market over 6 months, trading above the Ichimoku cloud — these describe past price behaviour, not a forecast5 of 9
Bearish technical signals1 of the 9 technical signals we can compute for it is currently in a bearish state: a "death cross" — its 50-day average is below its 200-day — these describe past price behaviour, not a forecast1 of 9

Trend (Ichimoku cloud)

1
Vs the Ichimoku cloudtrading 26% above the Ichimoku cloud — a band drawn from where its own highs and lows sat up to 2026-07-16 and projected forward over today's price, the side traders read as an established uptrend, with the band below acting as the level that would have to give way. The band itself is thin, spanning 1.3% of the share price, which is taken to mean a barrier that gives way easily.+25.7%

Volume-weighted price

2
Vs this year’s average price paidthe price is 25% above the average price paid so far this year, so the typical buyer over that stretch is showing a gain. That average is $49.46 — a volume-weighted average of daily closes over 155 sessions, not a true tick-by-tick VWAP.+25.4%
Vs the average paid since it last reportedthe price is 24% above the average price paid since it last reported on 2026-06-04 (its 8-K), so the typical buyer over that stretch is showing a gain. That average is $50.18 — a volume-weighted average of daily closes over 52 sessions, not a true tick-by-tick VWAP.+23.6%

Price levels it has turned at before

DOCU last closed at $62.00 on 2026-08-21. Since 2024-08-21 it has turned at 7 prices below its last close and 11 above; the 3 nearest below and the 3 nearest above are listed, nearest first.

LevelSideDistanceEvidence
$63.58Resistance2.5% above the last closeturned there four times · 2024-09-26 to 2026-01-06
$66.74Resistance7.7% above the last closeturned there three times · 2025-04-07 to 2025-10-16
$68.29Resistance10.2% above the last closeturned there three times · 2024-10-31 to 2025-10-30
$54.41Support12.3% below the last closeturned there twice · 2024-09-11 to 2026-07-17
$51.41Support17.1% below the last closeturned there twice · 2026-03-19 to 2026-05-19
$49.45Support20.2% below the last closeturned there three times · 2026-04-06 to 2026-05-04

A level is a price this company reversed or paused at more than once — they describe past behaviour, not a forecast of where the price will go.

Wave structure

Its recent swings can be read as a five-part upward sequence — what Elliott-wave chartists call an impulse — now in leg 4 of five, a pullback against that direction.

This labelling fails — stops being a possible reading at all — if it closes below $54.50.

This is one of several labellings that fit the same swings, so treat it as a reading rather than the reading. It was chosen from 2 labellings that survived the rules, counting shorter readings of the same bars.

On past moves of this shape the leg has usually ended somewhere between $55.91 and $60.84 — that is where it has tended to end if the count holds, not a forecast of where the price goes.

Alternate reading: The same swings also read as a completed three-part correction, which fails on a close above $65.25.

This labelling was already in place when we began recording count changes on 2026-08-13, so how long it has stood is not something we can say yet.

Read from daily closes as of 2026-08-21.

An Elliott-wave count describes the swings already printed and the level that would disprove it. It is not a forecast, a target, or advice.

Based on daily closing prices as of 2026-08-21. Describes past price behavior only — informational, not financial advice.

Ask about DOCU's technicals →

Analyst consensus

  • Consensus ratingHold (2.73 mean, 1=Strong Buy…5=Strong Sell) — 18 analysts
  • Mean price target$59.33 range $46.89 – $90.00; median $55.00

Analyst estimates, as of 2026-08-19. These are third-party analyst opinions and price targets, aggregated — not a recommendation, prediction, or advice from stocks-llm. Informational only.

Analyst EPS estimate for DOCU

  • Consensus EPS estimate$1.09 next reporting period, as of 2026-08-19

Change over time is not available yet: it needs two readings of the same reporting period at least 30 days apart, and we have been recording these estimates since 2026-08-04. An estimate for a DIFFERENT quarter is not a revision, so a reading from before the last report is never compared with one after it.

The consensus estimate for the next reporting period, and how it has moved between readings of that SAME period. A change is measured only between readings estimating one period — when a company reports, the consensus moves to the next quarter and the two numbers are not comparable. Informational only, not a forecast and not advice.

Ask how DOCU's estimates have moved →

Key risks (from latest filing)

["Heavy reliance on subscription revenue model creates customer retention and renewal risks if adoption slows or value perception declines","IAM platform is early growth phase (10.8% of ARR) with uncertain path to scale and execution risk in becoming a full platform company","Transition to user-based pricing model from traditional envelope-based pricing carries risk of customer confusion or churn during changeover"]

See DOCU's biggest risks from its latest 10-Q →

What changed in the latest 10-Q

AI-assisted comparison of DOCU's 10-Q filed 2026-06-05 against the prior one filed 2025-12-05.

Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)

  • Added:
    • Newer filing (2026-06-05) describes IAM platform as 'AI-native' whereas older filing (2025-12-05) does not use this descriptor
    • Newer filing (2026-06-05) states 'nearly 1.9 million customers' as of April 30, 2026 vs older filing (2025-12-05) stating 'nearly 1.8 million customers' as of October 31, 2025
    • Newer filing (2026-06-05) reports 1,258 customers with >$300,000 ARR as of April 30, 2026 vs older filing (2025-12-05) reporting 1,165 customers as of October 31, 2025
    • Newer filing (2026-06-05) specifies 'approximately 284,000 direct customers' as of April 30, 2026 vs older filing (2025-12-05) specifying 'approximately 276,000' SMBs, mid-market, and large enterprise customers
  • Removed:
    • Older filing (2025-12-05) mentions 'Other revenue includes amounts derived from sales of on-premises solutions' - this is not present in newer filing (2026-06-05)
    • Older filing (2025-12-05) states 'We anticipate a greater focus on investing in customer success through our professional services offered by partners' - this forward-looking statement is not in newer filing (2026-06-05)
    • Older filing (2025-12-05) refers to 'Executive Overview of Third Quarter Results' vs newer filing (2026-06-05) uses 'Executive Overview of First Quarter Results'
    • Older filing (2025-12-05) references 'fiscal 2025 Annual Report on Form 10-K' vs newer filing (2026-06-05) references 'fiscal 2026 Annual Report on Form 10-K'
    • Older filing (2025-12-05) describes 'three growth pillars' in long-term strategy vs newer filing (2026-06-05) describes 'two priorities'
    • Older filing (2025-12-05) references VSB (very small businesses) segment; newer filing (2026-06-05) uses SMB (small and medium-sized businesses) terminology
    • Older filing (2025-12-05) mentions '1,100 active partner integrations' vs newer filing (2026-06-05) states 'more than 1,100 active partner integrations'
    • Older filing (2025-12-05) includes nine-month financial results; newer filing (2026-06-05) shows only three-month results
  • Reworded:
    • Older filing (2025-12-05) describes IAM platform as automating workflows and leveraging AI capabilities; newer filing (2026-06-05) describes it as 'AI-native' and enables customers to 'ingest a vast, complex body of agreements into a single repository'
    • Older filing (2025-12-05) references 'partner-assisted sales' vs newer filing (2026-06-05) uses 'partner channel'
    • Older filing (2025-12-05) states customers 'at all scales' vs newer filing (2026-06-05) states customers 'of all sizes'
    • Older filing (2025-12-05) describes IAM as enabling customers to 'create, commit to, and manage agreements, from virtually anywhere in the world, securely' vs newer filing (2026-06-05) emphasizes managing 'agreements across every part of an organization and build workflows'
    • Older filing (2025-12-05) mentions three growth pillars including 'accelerate product innovation,' 'strengthen omnichannel GTM,' and 'enhance operational efficiency'; newer filing (2026-06-05) simplifies to two priorities: 'transform IAM into end-to-end platform' and 'expand AI data and innovation advantage'
    • Older filing (2025-12-05) categorizes customers by employee count (Global 2000, 250+ employees, 10-249, <10); newer filing (2026-06-05) uses ARR (annual recurring revenue) framework
    • Older filing (2025-12-05) includes discussion of 'providing a better customer experience' vs newer filing (2026-06-05) states 'customer-centric experience'
    • International revenue section: older filing (2025-12-05) does not show this metric; newer filing (2026-06-05) reports international revenue increased 17% and represented 31% of total revenue
  • Notes:
    • The two filings cover different fiscal quarters (Q1 fiscal 2027 vs Q3 fiscal 2026) and use different reporting dates (April 30, 2026 vs October 31, 2025), limiting direct comparisons
    • The older filing text appears truncated at the end and may not represent the complete section

Risk Factors

  • Added:
    • Added to Risk Factors Summary (2026-06-05): 'Disruptions to our business, strategy and demand for our solutions due to advances in, and uses of, AI and other technologies.'
    • Added to Risk Factors Summary (2026-06-05): 'Any inability to deliver excellent service and support to customers, retain and expand sales to existing customers, and attract new customers.'
    • Added to Risk Factors Summary (2026-06-05): 'Damage to our systems, data, reputation, brand and customer trust due to data breaches, cyberattacks, malicious activity, or failures of our (or third party cloud providers') technical infrastructure.'
  • Removed:
    • Removed from Risk Factors Summary (2025-12-05): 'Any inability to attract new customers and retain and expand sales to existing customers.' (consolidated into different wording in 2026-06-05)
    • Removed from Risk Factors Summary (2025-12-05): 'Our inability to anticipate or effectively respond to rapid changes in AI technology, which pose significant new competitive and other business, legal, compliance and reputational risks.'
    • Removed from Risk Factors Summary (2025-12-05): 'Our systems and security measures being compromised or subject to data breaches, cyberattacks, or other malicious activity, and any harm to our business or reputation caused by malicious actors attempting to exploit our technology, platform or brand to defraud others.'
    • Removed from Risk Factors Summary (2025-12-05): 'Any interruption or delay in performance from our technical infrastructure, including third-party cloud providers.'
    • Removed from Risk Factors Summary (2025-12-05): 'The implementation of AI in our business, and the legal, regulatory, reputational and business risks relating to its use.'
  • Reworded:
    • Risk Factors Summary - Business and Industry Risks (first bullet): Changed from 'Any decrease in adoption or sales of our eSignature product, without corresponding increases in our other solutions in our IAM platform' to 'Any decrease in adoption or sales of our eSignature product, without corresponding adoption or sales of our other solutions in our IAM platform' (2026-06-05 vs 2025-12-05)
    • Main Risk Factors section - eSignature revenue description: Changed from 'Sales of subscriptions to our eSignature product account for substantially all of our subscription revenue and are the source of substantially all of our professional services revenue' to 'Sales of subscriptions to our eSignature product account for the substantial majority of our subscription and professional services revenue' (2026-06-05 vs 2025-12-05)
    • Main Risk Factors section - heading: Changed from 'If we are unable to attract new customers and retain and expand sales to existing customers, our revenue growth will be adversely affected.' to text about IAM platform evolution (2026-06-05 vs 2025-12-05)
  • Notes:
    • The newer filing text appears truncated at the end of the provided excerpt ('Our platform, products, solutions or enhancements to our existing products and s'), limiting full comparison of the detailed Risk Factors section
    • The older filing excerpt also appears incomplete ('Our existing customers, especially our enterprise custom'), preventing complete assessment of all changes in the detailed discussion

AI-assisted comparison of two SEC filing sections. It describes wording and theme changes only, makes no materiality, legal, or investment judgement, and is not financial advice. Informational only — not financial advice.

Ask what changed in DOCU's latest 10-Q →

Insider activity (SEC Form 4)

0 open-market purchases and 13 open-market sales by insiders in the last 90 days.

  • Last 90 days0 buys · 13 sells ($3M) — 8 selling insiders
  • Last 180 days0 buys · 13 sells ($3M) — 8 selling insiders

Activity heuristic: net selling (a transparent product heuristic from the counts above, not a prediction or advice)

Most recent open-market transaction: 2026-07-01. As of 2026-08-25.

View full insider trading history → View SEC Form 3/4/5 filings

Ask about DOCU's insider activity →

Only open-market purchases (SEC code P) and sales (code S) are counted here. Option exercises, vesting/awards, gifts, and shares withheld for taxes are excluded — they are compensation or mechanical, not open-market conviction. Sales may be planned and non-discretionary (e.g. a Rule 10b5-1 plan) and are not necessarily bearish; open-market buying is not a recommendation to buy. Informational only — not financial advice.

Congressional trading disclosures

U.S. House members publicly disclose their own, their spouse's, and dependent children's stock transactions under the STOCK Act. We hold 2 matched disclosures for DOCU from U.S. House Clerk Periodic Transaction Report filings.

Congressional trading disclosures →

Institutional ownership (13F)

6 institutional 13F filers reported holding DOCU as of 2026-03-31 (quarter-end position, filed within 45 days).

  • Distinct 13F filers 6
  • Reported shares held 36,020,696
  • Reported value $1,707,741,172

reported quarterly holdings change (2025-12-31 → 2026-03-31): 0 new, 3 increased, 3 decreased, 0 exited. Change counts cover only managers that filed 13F reports in BOTH quarters, derived between two quarter-end snapshots — not same-day trades; a single manager is never said to have "bought" or "sold".

Institutional holdings are quarter-end long positions reported on SEC Form 13F-HR, filed up to 45 days after the quarter ends — they are delayed, are not real-time trades, exclude short positions and most non-US securities, and are not investment advice. Any increase/decrease is a reported change between two quarterly snapshots, not a same-day purchase or sale. These are quarter-end snapshots from the 13F filings on SEC EDGAR, filed within 45 days — not real-time, and any change is a difference between two quarterly reports, not a same-day trade. Informational only — not financial advice.

Ask about DOCU's institutional holders →

Short interest (FINRA)

DOCU had 15,123,951 shares of reported short interest as of the 2026-07-31 FINRA settlement date (delayed, bi-monthly; not real-time).

DOCU had 7.92% of its shares outstanding sold short as of the 2026-07-31 FINRA settlement date (percent of FLOAT would be higher — float is not disclosed in the source). FINRA reported 4.64 days to cover at the same settlement.

  • Reported short interest (shares) 15,123,951
  • Short interest (% of shares outstanding) 7.92%
  • Prior settlement (shares) 16,753,240
  • Reported change -9.73%
  • Days to cover (reported) 4.64

Reported to FINRA as of the 2026-07-31 settlement date. Short interest is reported to FINRA and published on a delayed, bi-monthly schedule (as of a settlement date, disseminated roughly eight business days later) — it is NOT real-time, does not cover every venue or all US trading, and is not a short-squeeze prediction or investment advice. Days-to-cover is the value FINRA reports; percent of float is not shown because the source file carries no share-count denominator — where a percent appears it is of shares OUTSTANDING, the larger base, and is therefore a floor on percent of float. Informational only — not financial advice.

Ask about DOCU's short interest →

Competitors & peers

AI-enriched competitor set. Linked names are companies covered by stocks-llm; other named peers are shown for reference only.

Not quite? Describe exactly what you want →

Compare DOCU vs…

Frequently asked questions

What does DocuSign (DOCU) do?

DocuSign develops a cloud-based Intelligent Agreement Management (IAM) platform that enables organizations to manage agreements across their entire business, with core offerings including the world's leading e-signature solution and contract lifecycle management (CLM) capabilities. The company generates 98% of revenue from subscription-based access to these products, serving over 1.8 million customers across virtually all industries, ranging from small and medium-sized businesses to global…

What sector is DocuSign (DOCU) in?

DocuSign (DOCU) is classified in the Information Technology sector. Its industry is Agreement management and contract lifecycle software. It trades on NASDAQ.

Who are DocuSign's (DOCU) competitors?

Notable peers of DocuSign (DOCU) include Adobe Sign, Salesforce, ServiceNow, Workiva and Ironclad. This peer set is informational only — not financial advice.

Has there been recent Congressional stock trading in DOCU?

Yes — we hold 2 matched STOCK Act disclosures for DOCU from U.S. House Clerk Periodic Transaction Report filings. These are legally-required disclosures (often filed 30–45 days after the trade), may belong to a U.S. House member, their spouse, or a dependent child, and are not an indicator of company performance or investment advice.

Is DocuSign (DOCU) overbought or oversold right now?

DocuSign (DOCU) is currently neither overbought nor oversold — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 62, in the neutral middle (as of 2026-08-21). RSI describes recent price momentum, not a forecast — informational only, not financial advice.

Where does stocks-llm's data on DOCU come from?

Fundamentals and prices come from market data, as of 2026-08-24; company filings and profile facts come from SEC EDGAR. All figures are delayed daily-close data shown with their as-of date — informational only, not financial advice.

Fundamentals: market data, as of 2026-08-24. Filings: SEC EDGAR. Prices are delayed daily-close data.

Last updated 2026-08-21.

Informational only — NOT financial advice. All figures are delayed daily-close data from SEC EDGAR & market data, shown with their as-of date.

Research stocks in your own words.

Informational only — NOT financial advice.

ScreenersBlogPrivacyiOS app