Flowers Foods (FLO)
Consumer Staples · Packaged Foods · NYSE
A leading US-based producer of packaged bakery goods operating through a extensive direct-store-delivery network.
What Flowers Foods does
Flowers Foods is one of the largest producers of packaged bakery foods in the United States. The company manufactures and markets a wide range of fresh bread, buns, rolls, snack cakes, and tortillas under national and regional brands, utilizing a direct-store-delivery distribution model.
Themes: consumer staples, packaged foods, bakery products, direct-store-delivery distribution
Fundamentals
- Price$5.94 as of 2026-10-08 close
- Market cap$1.3B as of 2026-08-14 (share count; price 2026-10-08)
- 1-year return-52.9% 2025-10-08 close $12.60 → 2026-10-08 close $5.94
- P/E17.30 as of 2026-10-08
- Net margin+1.6% FY2026, SEC XBRL
- ROE+6.4% FY2026, SEC XBRL
- Debt / equity1.33 as of 2026-09-03
- Revenue growth (YoY)+3.8% as of 2026-09-03
- Revenue CAGR (3y)+2.3% SEC XBRL
- Beta0.25 as of 2026-09-03
- Last reported earnings2026-08-20 SEC EDGAR Form 8-K (Item 2.02)
Dividend: yield +8.8%; at least 1 years of non-decreasing per-share dividends (SEC XBRL) — we do not hold the year before it, so the real streak may be longer.
How FLO compares in its sector
- price-to-earnings ratiomiddle range 91 covered Consumer Staples peers, as of 2026-10-08
- net profit marginmiddle range 105 covered Consumer Staples peers, as of 2026-09-03
- operating marginmiddle range 98 covered Consumer Staples peers, as of 2026-09-03
- return on equitymiddle range 106 covered Consumer Staples peers, as of 2026-09-03
- 3-year revenue CAGRmiddle range 109 covered Consumer Staples peers
- indicated dividend yieldtop 10% 77 covered Consumer Staples peers, as of 2026-09-03
- free cash flow (absolute dollars, latest fiscal year)middle range 110 covered Consumer Staples peers, as of FY2026
Position among covered Consumer Staples companies that report each metric (minimum 5 peers). A relative position within our covered catalog — not a valuation, quality, or investment judgment. A higher percentile is simply a higher value (for P/E, more expensive on earnings — never "better"). Informational only.
Dividend coverage (FY2026)
Exceeded at least one reported measure. In FY2026, FLO's dividend exceeded at least one reported measure of what it earned or generated (earnings payout 250%, free-cash-flow payout 66%). A payout above 100% in one year is not necessarily unsustainable, but it is not fully covered by that measure.
- Earnings payout250% dividends / net income
- Free-cash-flow payout66% dividends / (operating cash flow − capex)
Coverage derived from reported SEC EDGAR XBRL figures for FY2026 (dividends paid vs. net income and free cash flow, same fiscal year). This describes PAST coverage for one fiscal year — it does not predict whether a dividend will be maintained, raised, or cut, and a one-year payout ratio can be distorted by non-recurring items. Informational only — not financial advice.
How Flowers Foods looks technically
Flowers Foods (FLO) is trading 29.6% below its 200-day average, the long-term trend line — a long-term downtrend. Its 50-day average crossed below its 200-day average about 549 trading days ago — a "death cross", a bearish long-term signal. A strong downtrend is in place — ADX, a 0–100 trend-strength gauge, is 45, with sellers in control. Momentum is neutral — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 45, neither overbought (above 70) nor oversold (below 30). MACD, a trend-momentum gauge, turned bullish about 5 trading days ago (its momentum flipped positive). It made a new 20-day low about 7 trading days ago. It is 55.3% below its highest point of the past year.
Trend
8
| Distance from the 200-day | it is trading 29.6% below its 200-day average, the long-term trend line — a long-term downtrend | -29.6% |
|---|---|---|
| 50-day moving average | its average price over the last 50 trading days — a short-term trend line — is $6.55 | $6.55 |
| 200-day moving average | its average price over the last 200 trading days — the long-term trend line — is $8.43 | $8.43 |
| Swing structure | each recent peak has been lower than the one before it and each dip deeper — the pattern chart-watchers call a downtrend, which describes where price has already been and not where it goes next | lower highs and lower lows |
| Last swing turn | its last significant turn was a swing low 7 calendar days ago — the swings before that are what the structure reading is measured on | 7 sessions |
| Wave structure | its recent swings can be read as a completed five-part downward sequence — the pattern Elliott-wave chartists call an impulse — which on that reading would now be due a pullback rather than more of the same; the labelling fails if price closes below 5.4. It is the only labelling that fits, though not with textbook proportions, and it describes the swings already printed, not what comes next. | possible five-wave downward sequence, complete (atypical proportions) |
| Since the 50/200 cross | its 50-day average crossed below its 200-day average about 549 trading days ago — a "death cross", a bearish long-term signal | 549 sessions |
| Trend strength (14-day ADX) | a strong downtrend is in place — ADX, a 0–100 trend-strength gauge, is 45, with sellers in control | 45.3 |
Momentum
3
| 14-day RSI | momentum is neutral — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 45, neither overbought (above 70) nor oversold (below 30) | 45.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Position in its 14-day range | it is trading in the upper half of its 14-day range ($5.40 to $6.08) — its "stochastic" reading is 79 out of 100, where 0 would mean closing exactly at the 14-session low and 100 exactly at the high. This measures WHERE the price sits inside its recent range, which is a different question from the RSI beside it: RSI is a momentum gauge, measuring how FAST the price has been moving, so a stock can drift quietly to the bottom of its range with an ordinary RSI, or fall sharply and still sit in the middle. It has been climbing within that range over the last few sessions. | 79.4 |
| Since the MACD crossed zero | MACD, a trend-momentum gauge, turned bullish about 5 trading days ago (its momentum flipped positive) | 5 sessions |
Range
12
| 52-week high | its highest closing price over the past year (about 252 trading days) was $13.28 | $13.28 |
|---|---|---|
| From the 52-week high | it is 55.3% below its 52-week high (its highest price of the past year) | -55.3% |
| Above the 52-week low | it is 10.0% above its 52-week low (its lowest price of the past year) | +10.0% |
| Below the 52-week high | it is 55.3% below its highest point of the past year | 55.3% |
| Since a 20-day breakout | it made a new 20-day low about 7 trading days ago | 7 sessions |
| Since a 55-day breakout | it made a new 55-day low about 7 trading days ago | 7 sessions |
| All-time high | its highest closing price on record is $30.16 (set on 2022-12-02) | $30.16 |
| Given back of the 52-week move | over the past year its closes ranged ($5.55 to $13.16), and it has recovered only a small part of its fall from last year’s high — 5% of it. Chart-watchers call 61.8%-65% given back the "golden pocket" — for this company that is $10.25 to $10.50. It is watched widely enough that orders cluster there, which is the honest reason it matters; it is not a forecast. | 5.1% |
| From the all-time high | it is 80.3% below its all-time high | -80.3% |
| Nearest price level | it is trading 14.6% below a resistance level at $6.80 — a price it turned at twice since 2026-05-21, most recently on 2026-08-21. Since 2024-10-08 it has 0 such levels below the current price and 13 above. Levels like these describe where the price has reversed or paused before; they are not a forecast of where it will go. | +14.6% |
| All-time low | its lowest closing price on record is $5.40 (set on 2026-10-01) | $5.40 |
| Above the all-time low | it is 10.0% above its all-time low | +10.0% |
Volatility
5
| Band width vs its own 6 months | day-to-day price swings are narrower than usual versus its own recent 6-month history (tighter than about 71% of it) | 29th percentile |
|---|---|---|
| Typical daily range | in a typical session it travels about $0.2333 between its high and its low — about 3.9% of its price. That is its "average true range" over the last 14 sessions, which also counts the distance from the previous close, so a day that opens well away from yesterday counts as the large move it was | $0.2333 |
| Bollinger bands (20-day, ±2σ) | most of its recent trading has stayed between about $5.45 and $6.22 — the "Bollinger bands", a range drawn two standard deviations either side of its 20-day average price, which widens when the stock gets more volatile and narrows when it settles | $5.45 – $5.84 – $6.22 |
| Typical daily range (% of price) | its price moves about 3.9% in a typical session — about typical for the companies we cover. This is the average gap between a session's high and low over the last 14 sessions, counting overnight moves, expressed against the current price so it can be compared with companies trading at any price | 3.9% |
| Stretch from the 200-day average | it is trading 10.7 daily ranges below its 200-day average price (29.6% below it in plain percentage terms) — a way of asking how far it has stretched from its own average in units of how far it normally moves in a day, so a calm company and a jumpy one can be compared on the same scale | 10.7 daily ranges below its 200-day average |
Volume
1
| Volume vs its 30-day average | trading volume is about normal versus its 30-day average | 1.06× |
|---|
Analyst
2
| Change in the average price target | analysts' average price target is unchanged from the prior reading | 0.0% |
|---|---|---|
| Change in the consensus rating | not available for this company yet | n/a |
Candlestick patterns
2
| Since a hammer | 3 sessions ago, after a stretch of decline, it sold off hard during the session and then closed back near its high — a "hammer", the long lower wick showing the drop was bought back before the close | 3 sessions ago |
|---|---|---|
| Since a bearish engulfing | 6 sessions ago it opened above the previous session's close and finished below that session's open — a "bearish engulfing" pair, where one down day more than undid the up day before it | 6 sessions ago |
Price gaps
2
| Gap at the open | it opened on 2026-10-08 0.7% below the previous session's close — an overnight gap, the part of the move that happened while the market was shut, and traded back through that level before the close | -0.7% |
|---|---|---|
| Gap filled | a 2.8% gap down opened on 2026-08-21 has been "filled" 33 sessions ago — price traded back through the level the gap left behind, and it closed again during the very session that opened it | 33 sessions ago |
Price streaks
1
| Closing streak | it has closed higher 6 sessions in a row, a +7.03% move over the run — an unbroken run of up days, which describes what has already happened and says nothing about the next session | 6 sessions up |
|---|
Relative strength
4
| vs market, 1 month | over the past 1 month this stock lagged the market by 7.1 percentage points (the stock lost 6.0% while the market gained 1.0%) | -7.0% |
|---|---|---|
| vs market, 3 months | over the past 3 months this stock lagged the market by 32.9 percentage points (the stock lost 29.0% while the market gained 3.8%) | -32.9% |
| vs market, 6 months | over the past 6 months this stock lagged the market by 45.5 percentage points (the stock lost 28.0% while the market gained 17.5%) | -45.5% |
| vs market, 12 months | over the past 12 months this stock lagged the market by 67.8 percentage points (the stock lost 52.9% while the market gained 15.0%) | -67.8% |
Signal agreement
2
| Bullish technical signals | 1 of the 9 technical signals we can compute for it is currently in a bullish state: MACD momentum is positive — these describe past price behaviour, not a forecast | 1 of 9 |
|---|---|---|
| Bearish technical signals | 5 of the 9 technical signals we can compute for it are currently in a bearish state: a "death cross" — its 50-day average is below its 200-day, trading below its 200-day average, a strong downtrend, with sellers in control, lagging the market over 6 months, trading below the Ichimoku cloud — these describe past price behaviour, not a forecast | 5 of 9 |
Trend (Ichimoku cloud)
1
| Vs the Ichimoku cloud | trading 17% below the Ichimoku cloud — a band drawn from where its own highs and lows sat up to 2026-09-01 and projected forward over today's price, the side traders read as an established downtrend, with the band above acting as the level that would have to be cleared. The band itself is thick, spanning 9.6% of the share price, which is taken to mean a barrier that has held for a while and takes effort to cross. | -17.4% |
|---|
Volume-weighted price
2
| Vs this year’s average price paid | the price is 25% below the average price paid so far this year, so the typical buyer over that stretch is under water. That average is $7.93 — a volume-weighted average of daily closes over 190 sessions, not a true tick-by-tick VWAP. | -25.1% |
|---|---|---|
| Vs the average paid since it last reported | the price is 5% below the average price paid since it last reported on 2026-08-20 (its 10-Q), so the typical buyer over that stretch is under water. That average is $6.24 — a volume-weighted average of daily closes over 35 sessions, not a true tick-by-tick VWAP. | -4.9% |
Price levels it has turned at before
FLO last closed at $5.94 on 2026-10-08. Since 2024-10-08 it has turned at 0 prices below its last close and 13 above; the 3 nearest above are listed, nearest first.
| Level | Side | Distance | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| $6.80 | Resistance | 14.6% above the last close | turned there twice · 2026-05-21 to 2026-08-21 |
| $7.89 | Resistance | 32.9% above the last close | turned there three times · 2026-04-09 to 2026-07-09 |
| $8.94 | Resistance | 50.5% above the last close | turned there three times · 2026-03-16 to 2026-07-17 |
A level is a price this company reversed or paused at more than once — they describe past behaviour, not a forecast of where the price will go.
Wave structure
Its recent swings can be read as a five-part downward sequence — what Elliott-wave chartists call an impulse — now complete.
This labelling fails — stops being a possible reading at all — if it closes below $5.40.
It is the only labelling that fits these swings, though its proportions are not the textbook ones. It was chosen from 3 labellings that survived the rules, counting shorter readings of the same bars.
This reading has stood for 1 trading day, since 2026-10-08.
Read from daily closes as of 2026-10-08.
An Elliott-wave count describes the swings already printed and the level that would disprove it. It is not a forecast, a target, or advice.
Screens: Trading below the 200-day moving average · Pulled back from the 12-month high · MACD just crossed bullish (12/26/9) · lagging the market · On a winning streak (5+ higher closes in a row) · Stretched far below its 200-day average (6+ daily ranges) | Learn: moving average · golden cross · adx · rsi · macd · breakout · fifty two week high low
Based on daily closing prices as of 2026-10-08. Describes past price behavior only — informational, not financial advice.
Analyst consensus
- Consensus ratingHold (2.80 mean, 1=Strong Buy…5=Strong Sell) — 5 analysts
- Mean price target$7.40 range $5.00 – $12.00; median $6.00
Analyst estimates, as of 2026-10-09. These are third-party analyst opinions and price targets, aggregated — not a recommendation, prediction, or advice from stocks-llm. Informational only.
Analyst EPS estimate for FLO
- Consensus EPS estimate$0.1518 next reporting period, as of 2026-10-09
- Estimate change, 30 days-$0.00546 (-3.5%) from $0.1573, on 2026-09-04, 35-day window
- Readings revised upward0% of 7 comparable readings
The consensus estimate for the next reporting period, and how it has moved between readings of that SAME period. A change is measured only between readings estimating one period — when a company reports, the consensus moves to the next quarter and the two numbers are not comparable. Informational only, not a forecast and not advice.
Key risks (from latest filing)
["Disruptions or legal challenges to the direct-store-delivery model and independent contractor classifications.","Supply chain volatility impacting raw material and energy costs.","Changing consumer trends toward store-branded products and health-conscious alternatives."]
What changed in the latest 10-Q
AI-assisted comparison of FLO's 10-Q filed 2026-08-20 against the prior one filed 2026-05-21.
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
- Added:
- Newer filing adds a 'Recovery on inferior ingredients' line to the comparability table, showing $(1,963) thousand for both the twelve and twenty-eight weeks ended July 18, 2026.
- Newer filing changes the column headings in the comparability table from 'For the Sixteen Weeks Ended' to 'For the Twelve Weeks Ended' and 'For the Twenty-Eight Weeks Ended', with corresponding dates July 18, 2026 and July 12, 2025.
- Newer filing changes the table title from 'expense items affecting comparability' to 'expense (recovery) items affecting comparability'.
- Newer filing adds different amounts to the comparability table, including Business process improvement costs of $1,010 and $2,251, Restructuring charges of $0 and $1,652, Restructuring-related implementation costs of $5,545 and $13,772, Plant closure costs of $0 and $0, Legal settlements and related costs of $0 and $14,400, Acquisition and integration-related costs of $0 and $1,897, and a total of $4,592 and $32,009.
- Newer filing updates the ERP project incurred costs figure from approximately $272 million to approximately $275 million as of July 18, 2026.
- Newer filing omits the specific periods in the sentence describing expensed portion of ERP costs, changing from 'for the sixteen weeks ended April 25, 2026 and April 19, 2025' to a general statement without period references.
- Newer filing adds a sentence noting that in the first quarter of Fiscal 2026, RIF payments of $1.3 million were made in the second quarter of Fiscal 2026, in addition to the $0.8 million paid in the first quarter.
- Newer filing removes the specific consulting cost amounts of $8.2 million and $4.3 million for the sixteen weeks ended April 25, 2026 and April 19, 2025, replacing them with a reference to the table above.
- Newer filing adds a new paragraph about a reorganization effort subsequent to the second quarter of Fiscal 2026, including anticipated restructuring costs of approximately $6.0 million largely related to severance.
- Newer filing adds a new paragraph about spare parts and supplies totaling $102.2 million and a detailed review of those parts that commenced after the second quarter of Fiscal 2026, with the review expected to be completed by the end of Fiscal 2026.
- Newer filing removes the 'Legal settlements and related costs' bullet and its description, including the specific settlement amounts of $11.0 million, $3.4 million, and $1.9 million, and the $1.2 million territory repurchase liability reduction.
- Newer filing removes the 'Simple Mills acquisition and integration-related costs' bullet and its description, including the acquisition date of February 21, 2025, the total consideration of $846.2 million, and the description of Simple Mills products.
- Removed:
- Older filing has a comparability table with column headings 'For the Sixteen Weeks Ended' and dates April 25, 2026 and April 19, 2025.
- Older filing lists Business process improvement costs of $1,241 and $891, Restructuring charges of $1,652 and $573, Restructuring-related implementation costs of $8,227 and $4,288, Plant closure costs and impairment of assets of $0 and $7,397, Legal settlements and related costs of $14,400 and $697, Acquisition and integration-related costs of $1,897 and $13,764, and a total of $27,417 and $27,610.
- Older filing states ERP project incurred costs of approximately $272 million as of April 25, 2026.
- Older filing specifies that the expensed portion of ERP costs was 'for the sixteen weeks ended April 25, 2026 and April 19, 2025'.
- Older filing does not mention any RIF payment in the second quarter of Fiscal 2026, only stating that RIF payments of $0.8 million were made in the first quarter.
- Older filing states specific consulting costs of $8.2 million and $4.3 million during the sixteen weeks ended April 25, 2026 and April 19, 2025.
- Older filing does not include a reorganization effort paragraph or anticipated $6.0 million in restructuring costs.
- Older filing does not include any discussion of spare parts and supplies or a review of their carrying value.
- Older filing includes a 'Legal settlements and related costs' bullet describing settlements of $11.0 million and $3.4 million in the first quarter of Fiscal 2026, $1.9 million in the first quarter of Fiscal 2025, and a $1.2 million territory repurchase liability reduction.
- Older filing includes a 'Simple Mills acquisition and integration-related costs' bullet describing the February 21, 2025 acquisition for $846.2 million and related product details.
- Older filing has page break 28 inserted before the first quarter Fiscal 2026 RIF discussion.
- Older filing's restructuring paragraph ends with a sentence stating the review is ongoing and additional restructuring charges are anticipated in subsequent quarters, without a new reorganization description.
- Reworded:
- The introductory sentence in the newer filing references 'the twelve and twenty-eight weeks ended July 18, 2026' instead of the older filing's 'the sixteen weeks ended April 25, 2026'.
- The Results of operations bullet in the newer filing says 'the two comparative periods presented' instead of the older filing's 'the comparative period presented'.
- The newer filing's comparability table title adds '(recovery)' to describe expense (recovery) items.
- The newer filing updates the restructuring section to state that RIF payments of $0.8 million and $1.3 million were made in the first and second quarters of Fiscal 2026, respectively, whereas the older filing only stated $0.8 million was paid in the first quarter.
- The newer filing replaces the sentence listing specific consulting cost amounts with language referring readers to the table above for consulting costs associated with restructuring activities.
- The newer filing relocates the sentence 'This review is ongoing...' from the end of the original restructuring paragraph to the end of the new reorganization paragraph, now preceded by the new reorganization description.
- Notes:
- The newer filing text appears truncated in the middle of the 'Recovery on inferior ingredients' bullet, so some content after that point may not be captured.
- The older filing text appears truncated at the end of the 'Simple Mills acquisition and integration-related costs' bullet, so some content may be missing from the comparison.
AI-assisted comparison of two SEC filing sections. It describes wording and theme changes only, makes no materiality, legal, or investment judgement, and is not financial advice. Informational only — not financial advice.
Insider activity (SEC Form 4)
No open-market insider purchases or sales recorded in the last 90 days, of which we have read Form 4 filings through 2026-10-04. The 5 days since 2026-10-04 have not been checked yet.
- Last 180 days · read to 2026-10-041 buy ($37542) · 0 sells — 1 buying insider
Most recent open-market transaction: 2026-06-08. Based on Form 4 filings read through 2026-10-04; anything filed since is not yet included.
View full insider trading history → View SEC Form 3/4/5 filingsAsk about FLO's insider activity →
Only open-market purchases (SEC code P) and sales (code S) are counted here. Option exercises, vesting/awards, gifts, and shares withheld for taxes are excluded — they are compensation or mechanical, not open-market conviction. Sales may be planned and non-discretionary (e.g. a Rule 10b5-1 plan) and are not necessarily bearish; open-market buying is not a recommendation to buy. Informational only — not financial advice.
U.S. House trading disclosures
U.S. House members publicly disclose their own, their spouse's, and dependent children's stock transactions under the STOCK Act. We hold 4 matched disclosures for FLO from U.S. House Clerk Periodic Transaction Report filings.
U.S. House trading disclosures →Institutional ownership (13F)
6 institutional 13F filers reported holding FLO as of 2026-06-30 (quarter-end position, filed within 45 days).
- Distinct 13F filers 6
- Reported shares held 50,833,994
- Reported value $401,588,550
reported quarterly holdings change (2026-03-31 → 2026-06-30): 0 new, 4 increased, 2 decreased, 0 exited. Change counts cover only managers that filed 13F reports in BOTH quarters, derived between two quarter-end snapshots — not same-day trades; a single manager is never said to have "bought" or "sold".
Institutional holdings are quarter-end long positions reported on SEC Form 13F-HR, filed up to 45 days after the quarter ends — they are delayed, are not real-time trades, exclude short positions and most non-US securities, and are not investment advice. Any increase/decrease is a reported change between two quarterly snapshots, not a same-day purchase or sale. These are quarter-end snapshots from the 13F filings on SEC EDGAR, filed within 45 days — not real-time, and any change is a difference between two quarterly reports, not a same-day trade. Informational only — not financial advice.
Ask about FLO's institutional holders → See what each manager we track holds →
Short interest (FINRA)
FLO had 46,488,528 shares of reported short interest as of the 2026-09-15 FINRA settlement date (delayed, bi-monthly; not real-time).
FLO had 21.9% of its shares outstanding sold short as of the 2026-09-15 FINRA settlement date (percent of FLOAT would be higher — float is not disclosed in the source). FINRA reported 5.64 days to cover at the same settlement.
- Reported short interest (shares) 46,488,528
- Short interest (% of shares outstanding) 21.9%
- Prior settlement (shares) 45,041,055
- Reported change 3.21%
- Days to cover (reported) 5.64
Reported to FINRA as of the 2026-09-15 settlement date. Short interest is reported to FINRA and published on a delayed, bi-monthly schedule (as of a settlement date, disseminated roughly eight business days later) — it is NOT real-time, does not cover every venue or all US trading, and is not a short-squeeze prediction or investment advice. Days-to-cover is the value FINRA reports; percent of float is not shown because the source file carries no share-count denominator — where a percent appears it is of shares OUTSTANDING, the larger base, and is therefore a floor on percent of float. Informational only — not financial advice.
Competitors & peers
- Bimbo Bakeries USA (Grupo Bimbo)
- Campbell Soup Company (CPB)
- Hostess Brands (J.M. Smucker - SJM)
- General Mills (GIS)
- Private label bakery manufacturers
AI-enriched competitor set. Linked names are companies covered by stocks-llm; other named peers are shown for reference only.
Compare FLO vs…
Flowers Foods is found in…
Frequently asked questions
What does Flowers Foods (FLO) do?
Flowers Foods is one of the largest producers of packaged bakery foods in the United States. The company manufactures and markets a wide range of fresh bread, buns, rolls, snack cakes, and tortillas under national and regional brands, utilizing a direct-store-delivery distribution model.
What sector is Flowers Foods (FLO) in?
Flowers Foods (FLO) is classified in the Consumer Staples sector. Its industry is Packaged Foods. It trades on NYSE.
Does FLO pay a dividend?
Yes — Flowers Foods (FLO) pays a dividend, with an indicated yield of about 8.75% and at least 1 years of non-decreasing per-share dividends (SEC EDGAR XBRL) — we do not hold the year before it, so the real streak may be longer (market data, as of 2026-09-03). Informational only — not financial advice.
Who are Flowers Foods's (FLO) competitors?
Notable peers of Flowers Foods (FLO) include Bimbo Bakeries USA (Grupo Bimbo), Campbell Soup Company, Hostess Brands (J.M. Smucker - SJM), General Mills and Private label bakery manufacturers. This peer set is informational only — not financial advice.
Has there been recent U.S. House stock trading in FLO?
Yes — we hold 4 matched STOCK Act disclosures for FLO from U.S. House Clerk Periodic Transaction Report filings. These are legally-required disclosures (often filed 30–45 days after the trade), may belong to a U.S. House member, their spouse, or a dependent child, and are not an indicator of company performance or investment advice.
Is Flowers Foods (FLO) overbought or oversold right now?
Flowers Foods (FLO) is currently neither overbought nor oversold — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 45, in the neutral middle (as of 2026-10-08). RSI describes recent price momentum, not a forecast — informational only, not financial advice.
Where does stocks-llm's data on FLO come from?
Fundamentals come from SEC XBRL company filings for the figures marked with a fiscal year, and market data, as of 2026-09-03 for the rest; prices are market data, as of 2026-09-03; company filings and profile facts come from SEC EDGAR. All figures are delayed daily-close data shown with their as-of date — informational only, not financial advice.
Fundamentals: SEC XBRL company filings for the figures marked with a fiscal year, and market data, as of 2026-09-03 for the rest. Filings: SEC EDGAR. Prices are delayed daily-close data.
Last updated 2026-10-08.
Informational only — NOT financial advice. All figures are delayed daily-close data from SEC EDGAR & market data, shown with their as-of date.