GitLab (GTLB)
Information Technology · DevSecOps platforms / CI-CD orchestration · NASDAQ
GitLab is the unified DevSecOps platform that orchestrates development, security, and operations teams plus AI agents across the entire software lifecycle to compress development cycles from weeks to minutes.
What GitLab does
GitLab is an intelligent orchestration platform for DevSecOps that unifies development, operations, IT, security, and business teams across the entire software development lifecycle. Built on an open-core model with a unified data model, the platform enables teams and AI agents to orchestrate complex workflows autonomously while embedding security and compliance directly into development processes. GitLab serves over 50 million registered users including approximately 50% of Fortune 100 companies, offering flexible deployment options including self-managed, SaaS, and dedicated single-tenant solutions.
Themes: DevSecOps / software development lifecycle, AI orchestration and agent coordination, CI/CD automation, Security and compliance in development workflows, Open-source software and open-core model, Development team productivity and velocity, DevOps platform
Fundamentals
- Price$41.67 as of 2026-08-21 close
- Market cap$7.3B as of 2026-08-24
- 1-year return-5.7% 2025-08-21 close $44.18 → 2026-08-21 close $41.67
- P/En/a negative earnings
- Net margin-2.5% as of 2026-08-24
- Gross margin+86.8% as of 2026-08-24
- ROE-2.7% as of 2026-08-24
- Debt / equity0.00 as of 2026-08-24
- Revenue growth (YoY)+24.9% as of 2026-08-24
- Revenue CAGR (3y)+31.1% SEC XBRL
- Beta0.96 as of 2026-08-24
- Last reported earnings2026-06-02 SEC EDGAR Form 8-K (Item 2.02)
How GTLB compares in its sector
- net profit marginmiddle range 405 covered Information Technology peers, as of 2026-08-24
- operating marginmiddle range 405 covered Information Technology peers, as of 2026-08-24
- gross margintop 10% 403 covered Information Technology peers, as of 2026-08-24
- return on equitymiddle range 405 covered Information Technology peers, as of 2026-08-24
- 3-year revenue CAGRtop 25% 386 covered Information Technology peers
- free cash flow (absolute dollars, latest fiscal year)middle range 382 covered Information Technology peers, as of FY2026
Position among covered Information Technology companies that report each metric (minimum 5 peers). A relative position within our covered catalog — not a valuation, quality, or investment judgment. A higher percentile is simply a higher value (for P/E, more expensive on earnings — never "better"). Informational only.
Top 10 scores & list membership
GTLB is not currently in any published Top 10 list. Its scores are below.
Long-term score
Not scored for the long-term list: no shareholder return data.
Short-term score
67.0 #23 of 1,704 scored · #2 of 261 in Information Technology
Trend 82nd: the price is 32% above the average price paid over the period covered, so the typical buyer over that stretch is showing a gain; momentum 72nd: over the past 3 months this stock beat the market by 59.5 percentage points; weakest is setup 50th: day-to-day price swings are unusually wide versus its own recent history (wider than about 80% of the past ~6 months).
Scores as of 21 Aug 2026. Each bar is a percentile: how this company ranked against every company the score ranked, 0–100. A list is a published formula and its output, not a recommendation. Method version 2.
How GitLab looks technically
GitLab (GTLB) is trading 30.2% above its 200-day average, the long-term trend line — a longer-term uptrend. Its 50-day average crossed above its 200-day average about 7 trading days ago — a "golden cross", a bullish long-term signal. A strong uptrend is in place — ADX, a 0–100 trend-strength gauge, is 32, with buyers in control. Momentum is neutral — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 63, neither overbought (above 70) nor oversold (below 30). It made a new 20-day high about 7 trading days ago. It is 20.4% below its highest point of the past year.
Trend
9
| Distance from the 200-day | it is trading 30.2% above its 200-day average, the long-term trend line — a longer-term uptrend | +30.2% |
|---|---|---|
| 50-day moving average | its average price over the last 50 trading days — a short-term trend line — is $33.66 | $33.66 |
| 200-day moving average | its average price over the last 200 trading days — the long-term trend line — is $32.00 | $32.00 |
| Swing structure | each recent peak has been higher than the one before it and each dip has been shallower — the pattern chart-watchers call an uptrend, which describes where price has already been and not where it goes next | higher highs and higher lows |
| Last swing turn | its last significant turn was a swing high 7 calendar days ago — the swings before that are what the structure reading is measured on | 7 sessions |
| Wave structure | its recent swings can be read as a five-part upward sequence — what Elliott-wave chartists call an impulse — now in the fourth leg, a pullback against that upward direction; the labelling fails if price closes below 35.24. It is one of several labellings that fit, and it describes the swings already printed, not what comes next. The same swings also read as a completed three-part correction. | possible upward five-wave sequence, in wave 4 (one of several readings) |
| Since the 50/200 cross | its 50-day average crossed above its 200-day average about 7 trading days ago — a "golden cross", a bullish long-term signal | 7 sessions |
| Above the 200-day after a dip | it recently dipped to its 200-day average (the long-term trend line) and has since climbed back above it — now about 30.2% above | +30.2% |
| Trend strength (14-day ADX) | a strong uptrend is in place — ADX, a 0–100 trend-strength gauge, is 32, with buyers in control | 32.4 |
Momentum
3
| 14-day RSI | momentum is neutral — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 63, neither overbought (above 70) nor oversold (below 30) | 63.3 |
|---|---|---|
| Position in its 14-day range | it is trading in the upper half of its 14-day range ($33.89 to $43.81) — its "stochastic" reading is 78 out of 100, where 0 would mean closing exactly at the 14-session low and 100 exactly at the high. This measures WHERE the price sits inside its recent range, which is a different question from the RSI beside it: RSI is a momentum gauge, measuring how FAST the price has been moving, so a stock can drift quietly to the bottom of its range with an ordinary RSI, or fall sharply and still sit in the middle. It has been slipping within that range over the last few sessions. | 78.4 |
| Since the MACD crossed zero | MACD, a trend-momentum gauge, is in positive territory (momentum leaning bullish) | 16 sessions |
Range
12
| 52-week high | its highest closing price over the past year (about 252 trading days) was $52.38 | $52.38 |
|---|---|---|
| From the 52-week high | it is 20.4% below its 52-week high (its highest price of the past year) | -20.4% |
| Above the 52-week low | it is 122.5% above its 52-week low (its lowest price of the past year) | +122.5% |
| Below the 52-week high | it is 20.4% below its highest point of the past year | 20.4% |
| Since a 20-day breakout | it made a new 20-day high about 7 trading days ago | 7 sessions |
| Since a 55-day breakout | it made a new 55-day high about 7 trading days ago | 7 sessions |
| All-time high | its highest closing price on record is $78.53 (set on 2024-02-09) | $78.53 |
| Given back of the 52-week move | over the past year its closes ranged ($19.42 to $51.04), and it has recovered well over two thirds of its fall from last year’s high — 70% of it. Chart-watchers call 61.8%-65% given back the "golden pocket" — for this company that is $38.96 to $39.97. It is watched widely enough that orders cluster there, which is the honest reason it matters; it is not a forecast. | 70.4% |
| From the all-time high | it is 46.9% below its all-time high | -46.9% |
| Nearest price level | it is sitting right on a resistance level at $41.77 — a price it turned at three times since 2025-07-16, most recently on 2025-12-11. Since 2024-08-21 it has 5 such levels below the current price and 14 above. Levels like these describe where the price has reversed or paused before; they are not a forecast of where it will go. | +0.3% |
| All-time low | its lowest closing price on record is $18.73 (set on 2026-04-10) | $18.73 |
| Above the all-time low | it is 122.5% above its all-time low | +122.5% |
Volatility
5
| Band width vs its own 6 months | day-to-day price swings are unusually wide versus its own recent history (wider than about 80% of the past ~6 months) | 80th percentile |
|---|---|---|
| Typical daily range | in a typical session it travels about $2.02 between its high and its low — about 4.9% of its price. That is its "average true range" over the last 14 sessions, which also counts the distance from the previous close, so a day that opens well away from yesterday counts as the large move it was | $2.02 |
| Bollinger bands (20-day, ±2σ) | most of its recent trading has stayed between about $31.19 and $45.71 — the "Bollinger bands", a range drawn two standard deviations either side of its 20-day average price, which widens when the stock gets more volatile and narrows when it settles | $31.19 – $38.45 – $45.71 |
| Typical daily range (% of price) | its price moves about 4.9% in a typical session — about typical for the companies we cover. This is the average gap between a session's high and low over the last 14 sessions, counting overnight moves, expressed against the current price so it can be compared with companies trading at any price | 4.8% |
| Stretch from the 200-day average | it is trading 4.8 daily ranges above its 200-day average price (30.2% above it in plain percentage terms) — a way of asking how far it has stretched from its own average in units of how far it normally moves in a day, so a calm company and a jumpy one can be compared on the same scale | 4.8 daily ranges above its 200-day average |
Volume
1
| Volume vs its 30-day average | trading volume is about normal versus its 30-day average | 0.75× |
|---|
Analyst
2
| Change in the average price target | analysts have raised their average price target by 5.9% since the prior reading | +5.9% |
|---|---|---|
| Change in the consensus rating | the analyst consensus rating is unchanged since the prior reading | unchanged |
Price gaps
3
| Gap at the open | it opened on 2026-08-21 0.4% above the previous session's close — an overnight gap, the part of the move that happened while the market was shut, and traded back through that level before the close | +0.4% |
|---|---|---|
| Open gap | it gapped 5.2% above the previous close 10 sessions ago and has not traded back through the level it left behind at 35.68 — an "unfilled gap", which describes a price range no trade has since crossed and is not a forecast that it will be crossed | +5.2% |
| Gap filled | a 5.3% gap down opened on 2026-08-06 has been "filled" 10 sessions ago — price traded back through the level the gap left behind, and it took 1 session to close | 10 sessions ago |
Price streaks
1
| Closing streak | it has closed lower 2 sessions in a row, a -2.18% move over the run — an unbroken run of down days, which describes what has already happened and says nothing about the next session | 2 sessions down |
|---|
Relative strength
4
| vs market, 1 month | over the past 1 month this stock beat the market by 24.5 percentage points (the stock gained 26.8% while the market gained 2.3%) | +24.5% |
|---|---|---|
| vs market, 3 months | over the past 3 months this stock beat the market by 59.5 percentage points (the stock gained 62.6% while the market gained 3.1%) | +59.5% |
| vs market, 6 months | over the past 6 months this stock beat the market by 46.8 percentage points (the stock gained 57.9% while the market gained 11.1%) | +46.8% |
| vs market, 12 months | over the past 12 months this stock lagged the market by 26.2 percentage points (the stock lost 5.7% while the market gained 20.5%) | -26.2% |
Signal agreement
2
| Bullish technical signals | 6 of the 9 technical signals we can compute for it are currently in a bullish state: a strong uptrend, with buyers in control, a "golden cross" — its 50-day average is above its 200-day, trading above its 200-day average, MACD momentum is positive, outperforming the market over 6 months, trading above the Ichimoku cloud — these describe past price behaviour, not a forecast | 6 of 9 |
|---|---|---|
| Bearish technical signals | 0 of the 9 technical signals we can compute for it are currently in a bearish state — these describe past price behaviour, not a forecast | 0 of 9 |
Trend (Ichimoku cloud)
1
| Vs the Ichimoku cloud | trading 32% above the Ichimoku cloud — a band drawn from where its own highs and lows sat up to 2026-07-16 and projected forward over today's price, the side traders read as an established uptrend, with the band below acting as the level that would have to give way. The band itself is moderate, spanning 7.8% of the share price. | +32.2% |
|---|
Volume-weighted price
2
| Vs this year’s average price paid | the price is 45% above the average price paid so far this year, so the typical buyer over that stretch is showing a gain. That average is $28.76 — a volume-weighted average of daily closes over 156 sessions, not a true tick-by-tick VWAP. | +44.9% |
|---|---|---|
| Vs the average paid since it last reported | the price is 32% above the average price paid since it last reported on 2026-05-11 (its 8-K), so the typical buyer over that stretch is showing a gain. That average is $31.55 — a volume-weighted average of daily closes over 69 sessions, not a true tick-by-tick VWAP. | +32.1% |
Price levels it has turned at before
GTLB last closed at $41.67 on 2026-08-21. Since 2024-08-21 it has turned at 5 prices below its last close and 14 above; the 3 nearest below and the 3 nearest above are listed, nearest first.
| Level | Side | Distance | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| $41.77 | Resistance | 0.3% above the last close | turned there three times · 2025-07-16 to 2025-12-11 |
| $42.88 | Resistance | 2.9% above the last close | turned there twice · 2025-10-01 to 2025-10-14 |
| $39.82 | Support | 4.4% below the last close | turned there twice · 2025-04-21 to 2025-06-23 |
| $43.73 | Resistance | 4.9% above the last close | turned there twice · 2025-12-02 to 2026-08-14 |
| $38.73 | Support | 7.1% below the last close | turned there twice · 2025-08-11 to 2026-01-26 |
| $35.11 | Support | 15.7% below the last close | turned there twice · 2026-07-10 to 2026-07-20 |
A level is a price this company reversed or paused at more than once — they describe past behaviour, not a forecast of where the price will go.
Wave structure
Its recent swings can be read as a five-part upward sequence — what Elliott-wave chartists call an impulse — now in leg 4 of five, a pullback against that direction.
This labelling fails — stops being a possible reading at all — if it closes below $35.24.
This is one of several labellings that fit the same swings, so treat it as a reading rather than the reading. It was chosen from 2 labellings that survived the rules, counting shorter readings of the same bars.
On past moves of this shape the leg has usually ended somewhere between $36.83 and $40.52 — that is where it has tended to end if the count holds, not a forecast of where the price goes.
Alternate reading: The same swings also read as a completed three-part correction, which fails on a close above $43.81.
This reading has stood for 1 trading day, since 2026-08-21.
Read from daily closes as of 2026-08-21.
An Elliott-wave count describes the swings already printed and the level that would disprove it. It is not a forecast, a target, or advice.
Screens: Trading above the 200-day moving average · Recent golden cross (50-day crossed above 200-day) · Tested and reclaimed 200-day support · Pulled back from the 12-month high · in a strong, established uptrend (ADX) · Analyst price target recently RAISED | Learn: moving average · golden cross · adx · rsi · breakout · fifty two week high low
Based on daily closing prices as of 2026-08-21. Describes past price behavior only — informational, not financial advice.
Analyst consensus
- Consensus ratingHold (2.52 mean, 1=Strong Buy…5=Strong Sell) — 23 analysts
- Mean price target$36.13 range $25.00 – $60.00; median $35.00
Analyst estimates, as of 2026-08-21. These are third-party analyst opinions and price targets, aggregated — not a recommendation, prediction, or advice from stocks-llm. Informational only.
Analyst EPS estimate for GTLB
- Consensus EPS estimate$0.1796 next reporting period, as of 2026-08-21
Change over time is not available yet: it needs two readings of the same reporting period at least 30 days apart, and we have been recording these estimates since 2026-08-04. An estimate for a DIFFERENT quarter is not a revision, so a reading from before the last report is never compared with one after it.
The consensus estimate for the next reporting period, and how it has moved between readings of that SAME period. A change is measured only between readings estimating one period — when a company reports, the consensus moves to the next quarter and the two numbers are not comparable. Informational only, not a forecast and not advice.
Key risks (from latest filing)
["Intense competition from established DevOps and CI/CD vendors (GitHub, Atlassian, JetBrains) and emerging AI-native development tools may pressure market share and pricing","Continued R&D investment to sustain innovation leadership and maintain monthly release cadence may negatively impact near-term profitability despite strong gross margins (87%)","Dependency on open-core model's ability to drive adoption and convert community users to paying customers, with execution risk on AI agent orchestration capabilities that differentiate against competitors"]
What changed in the latest 10-Q
AI-assisted comparison of GTLB's 10-Q filed 2026-06-02 against the prior one filed 2025-12-03.
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
- Added:
- Added description of AI agents in platform overview: 'where software teams and their Artificial Intelligence ("AI") agents stay in flow to ship software faster' (2026-06-02 filing)
- Added new paragraph about AI coordination challenges: 'AI has accelerated individual coding, but teams lose momentum coordinating across planning, testing, security, deployment, and operations...' (2026-06-02 filing)
- Added description of intelligent orchestration for AI agents: 'GitLab's intelligent orchestration helps solve this by enabling teams to orchestrate AI agents to execute tasks autonomously across the software lifecycle...' (2026-06-02 filing)
- Added reference to AI Catalog: 'extending our Continuous Integration ("CI")/Continuous Delivery ("CD") Catalog and AI Catalog' (2026-06-02 filing)
- Added specific merge request contribution metric: 'In calendar year 2025, users contributed more than 6,500 merge requests' (2026-06-02 filing)
- Added specific Fortune 500 ranking reference: 'Fortune 100 refers to the top 20% ranked companies in the 2025 Fortune 500 list, published in June 2025' (2026-06-02 filing)
- Added specific customer metrics: 'Base Customers increased to 10,831 as of April 30, 2026 from 10,104 as of April 30, 2025, an increase of 7%' and '$100,000 ARR customers increased to 1,519 as of April 30, 2026 from 1,288 as of April 30, 2025, an increase of 18%' (2026-06-02 filing)
- Added descriptor 'single-tenant' hyphenation: 'deploy GitLab Dedicated, our single-tenant SaaS solution' (2026-06-02 filing)
- Removed:
- Removed extensive paragraph about market transformation needs and value stream-driven approach (2025-12-03 filing had detailed discussion of business transformation, productivity measurement, security supply chain, cloud migration, and value stream-driven mindset)
- Removed statement 'more than 50% of the Fortune 100 companies are GitLab customers' replaced with 'approximately 50% of the Fortune 100 companies are GitLab customers' (2026-06-02 filing)
- Removed specific 2024 open source contribution metrics: 'In calendar year 2024, nearly 900 people contributed more than 3,000 merge requests' (2025-12-03 filing)
- Removed detailed explanation of transparent business value and responsible transparency sections (2025-12-03 filing)
- Removed paragraph about making strategy, direction, and product roadmap available to wider community (2025-12-03 filing had separate paragraph; 2026-06-02 combines into single sentence)
- Reworded:
- Changed platform description from 'The DevSecOps platform' to 'the intelligent orchestration platform for DevSecOps' throughout (2026-06-02 filing)
- Changed opening description from 'software defines the speed of innovation' framing to direct product positioning as 'intelligent orchestration platform' (2026-06-02 filing)
- Changed 'The DevSecOps platform' references to 'The GitLab platform' in multiple locations (2026-06-02 filing)
- Changed historical release statement from '169 months' as of October 31, 2025 to '175 months' as of April 30, 2026 (reflects date updates from 2025-12-03 to 2026-06-02 filing)
- Changed 'any customer and contributor' to 'Any customer or contributor' (capitalization change) (2026-06-02 filing)
- Reordered deployment options description: moved 'on-premises or hybrid cloud environments' earlier and added 'public or private clouds' specification (2026-06-02 filing)
- Changed 'For our self-managed offering, the customer installs' to 'Customers can install self-managed GitLab instances' (2026-06-02 filing)
- Changed 'For our SaaS offering, the platform is managed by GitLab and hosted either in our public cloud or in our private cloud' to 'use our fully managed SaaS offering in public or private clouds' (2026-06-02 filing)
- Changed footnote attribution from 'more than 50%' to 'approximately 50%' (2026-06-02 filing)
- Notes:
- Text comparison was limited by truncation in both filings; full MD&A section not provided
- Some sections of older filing (2025-12-03) appear truncated at 'We also offer GitLab Dedicated' and in 'Acquiring New Customers' section, limiting completeness of comparison
- Date references shifted from October 31, 2025 to April 30, 2026 reflecting natural quarterly progression; metric updates (months of releases, customer counts) reflect this calendar advancement
Risk Factors
- Added:
- Added mention of AI adoption as a factor that may contribute to revenue decline: 'changes to technology, such as increased AI adoption'
- Added new sentence about AI tooling costs: 'In addition, we have made, or intend to make, investments in AI tools whose costs are subject to third-party pricing increases, usage-based variability, and contractual minimums and if these AI tooling costs increase, our operating expenses and cash flow could be adversely affected.'
- Added reference to 'our usage (or consumption) billing model' as a factor affecting ability to forecast
- Removed:
- Removed reference to 'our plans to introduce usage billing models' (changed from future plans to current models in newer filing)
- Removed financial comparison for fiscal year 2024: 'net losses of approximately $425.7 million' in fiscal year 2024
- Removed reference to nine-month period ending October 31, 2025 net loss of '$53.4 million'
- Removed accumulated deficit figure: 'we had an accumulated deficit of approximately $1.2 billion' as of October 31, 2025
- Reworded:
- Changed Base Customers disclosure from '10,475 as of October 31, 2025 from 9,519 as of October 31, 2024' to '10,831 as of April 30, 2026 from 10,104 as of April 30, 2025' (reflects updated reporting period)
- Changed revenue period from 'nine months ended October 31, 2025 and 2024 was $694.8 million and $547.8 million, respectively, representing a growth rate of 27%' to 'three months ended April 30, 2026 and 2025 was $264.2 million and $214.5 million, respectively, representing a growth rate of 23%' (reflects different quarterly reporting)
- Changed phrasing from 'our plans to introduce usage billing models' to 'our usage billing models' (reflects transition from planned to implemented)
- Changed net loss disclosure from 'fiscal year 2024, 2025 and nine months ended October 31, 2025' to 'fiscal year 2025, 2026 and the three months ended April 30, 2026'
- Changed reference from '$6.3 million, $56.0 million and $5.0 million' net losses to reflect different fiscal years and periods
- Notes:
- The newer filing text appears truncated at the end ('we had an accum'), limiting full comparison of the profitability section
- Both filings show similar structural and thematic content; differences primarily reflect updated financial periods and data rather than substantive risk factor changes
AI-assisted comparison of two SEC filing sections. It describes wording and theme changes only, makes no materiality, legal, or investment judgement, and is not financial advice. Informational only — not financial advice.
Insider activity (SEC Form 4)
1 open-market purchase and 2 open-market sales by insiders in the last 90 days.
- Last 90 days1 buy ($122960) · 2 sells ($3M) — 1 buying, 1 selling insiders
- Last 180 days1 buy ($122960) · 5 sells ($9M) — 1 buying, 1 selling insiders
Activity heuristic: net selling (a transparent product heuristic from the counts above, not a prediction or advice)
Most recent open-market transaction: 2026-06-30. As of 2026-08-25.
View full insider trading history → View SEC Form 3/4/5 filingsAsk about GTLB's insider activity →
Only open-market purchases (SEC code P) and sales (code S) are counted here. Option exercises, vesting/awards, gifts, and shares withheld for taxes are excluded — they are compensation or mechanical, not open-market conviction. Sales may be planned and non-discretionary (e.g. a Rule 10b5-1 plan) and are not necessarily bearish; open-market buying is not a recommendation to buy. Informational only — not financial advice.
Congressional trading disclosures
U.S. House members publicly disclose their own, their spouse's, and dependent children's stock transactions under the STOCK Act. We hold 2 matched disclosures for GTLB from U.S. House Clerk Periodic Transaction Report filings.
Congressional trading disclosures →Institutional ownership (13F)
6 institutional 13F filers reported holding GTLB as of 2026-03-31 (quarter-end position, filed within 45 days).
- Distinct 13F filers 6
- Reported shares held 14,783,073
- Reported value $319,905,701
reported quarterly holdings change (2025-12-31 → 2026-03-31): 1 new, 3 increased, 2 decreased, 1 exited. Change counts cover only managers that filed 13F reports in BOTH quarters, derived between two quarter-end snapshots — not same-day trades; a single manager is never said to have "bought" or "sold".
Institutional holdings are quarter-end long positions reported on SEC Form 13F-HR, filed up to 45 days after the quarter ends — they are delayed, are not real-time trades, exclude short positions and most non-US securities, and are not investment advice. Any increase/decrease is a reported change between two quarterly snapshots, not a same-day purchase or sale. These are quarter-end snapshots from the 13F filings on SEC EDGAR, filed within 45 days — not real-time, and any change is a difference between two quarterly reports, not a same-day trade. Informational only — not financial advice.
Short interest (FINRA)
GTLB had 19,146,321 shares of reported short interest as of the 2026-07-31 FINRA settlement date (delayed, bi-monthly; not real-time).
Short interest as a percent of shares outstanding is not shown for GTLB because we do not hold a verified share count to divide it by. The reported figures above are unaffected.
- Reported short interest (shares) 19,146,321
- Prior settlement (shares) 19,138,615
- Reported change 0.04%
- Days to cover (reported) 4.9
Reported to FINRA as of the 2026-07-31 settlement date. Short interest is reported to FINRA and published on a delayed, bi-monthly schedule (as of a settlement date, disseminated roughly eight business days later) — it is NOT real-time, does not cover every venue or all US trading, and is not a short-squeeze prediction or investment advice. Days-to-cover is the value FINRA reports; percent of float is not shown because the source file carries no share-count denominator — where a percent appears it is of shares OUTSTANDING, the larger base, and is therefore a floor on percent of float. Informational only — not financial advice.
Competitors & peers
- GitHub
- Atlassian (TEAM)
- JetBrains
- HashiCorp
- CloudBees
- LaunchDarkly
AI-enriched competitor set. Linked names are companies covered by stocks-llm; other named peers are shown for reference only.
Compare GTLB vs…
Frequently asked questions
What does GitLab (GTLB) do?
GitLab is an intelligent orchestration platform for DevSecOps that unifies development, operations, IT, security, and business teams across the entire software development lifecycle. Built on an open-core model with a unified data model, the platform enables teams and AI agents to orchestrate complex workflows autonomously while embedding security and compliance directly into development processes.
What sector is GitLab (GTLB) in?
GitLab (GTLB) is classified in the Information Technology sector. Its industry is DevSecOps platforms / CI-CD orchestration. It trades on NASDAQ.
Who are GitLab's (GTLB) competitors?
Notable peers of GitLab (GTLB) include GitHub, Atlassian, JetBrains, HashiCorp and CloudBees. This peer set is informational only — not financial advice.
Has there been recent Congressional stock trading in GTLB?
Yes — we hold 2 matched STOCK Act disclosures for GTLB from U.S. House Clerk Periodic Transaction Report filings. These are legally-required disclosures (often filed 30–45 days after the trade), may belong to a U.S. House member, their spouse, or a dependent child, and are not an indicator of company performance or investment advice.
Is GitLab (GTLB) overbought or oversold right now?
GitLab (GTLB) is currently neither overbought nor oversold — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 63, in the neutral middle (as of 2026-08-21). RSI describes recent price momentum, not a forecast — informational only, not financial advice.
Where does stocks-llm's data on GTLB come from?
Fundamentals and prices come from market data, as of 2026-08-24; company filings and profile facts come from SEC EDGAR. All figures are delayed daily-close data shown with their as-of date — informational only, not financial advice.
Fundamentals: market data, as of 2026-08-24. Filings: SEC EDGAR. Prices are delayed daily-close data.
Last updated 2026-08-21.
Informational only — NOT financial advice. All figures are delayed daily-close data from SEC EDGAR & market data, shown with their as-of date.