JFROG LTD (FROG)
Information Technology · DevOps and Software Supply Chain Management · NASDAQ
JFrog provides an end-to-end platform for managing, securing, and automating the entire software supply chain from development to production.
What JFROG LTD does
JFrog provides a foundational platform for software supply chain management, enabling organizations to unify the consumption, creation, and continuous distribution of software. The company supports hybrid environments, offering solutions for software development, security, governance, and distribution to diverse teams including developers, security professionals, and AI/ML engineers. Their subscription-based business model offers both self-managed and SaaS deployments to support the concept of "Liquid Software."
Themes: DevOps, software supply chain security, cloud-native infrastructure, AI/ML infrastructure, SaaS platform
Fundamentals
- Price$90.14 as of 2026-08-24 close
- Market cap$11.1B as of 2026-08-24
- 1-year return+91.6% 2025-08-22 close $47.04 → 2026-08-24 close $90.14
- P/En/a negative earnings
- Net margin-10.9% as of 2026-08-24
- Gross margin+77.5% as of 2026-08-24
- ROE-7.0% as of 2026-08-24
- Debt / equity0.00 as of 2026-08-24
- Revenue growth (YoY)+25.0% as of 2026-08-24
- Revenue CAGR (3y)+23.8% SEC XBRL
- Beta1.24 as of 2026-08-24
- Last reported earnings2026-08-06 SEC EDGAR Form 8-K (Item 2.02)
How FROG compares in its sector
- net profit marginbottom 25% 405 covered Information Technology peers, as of 2026-08-24
- operating marginbottom 25% 405 covered Information Technology peers, as of 2026-08-24
- gross margintop 25% 403 covered Information Technology peers, as of 2026-08-24
- return on equitymiddle range 405 covered Information Technology peers, as of 2026-08-24
- 3-year revenue CAGRtop 25% 386 covered Information Technology peers
- free cash flow (absolute dollars, latest fiscal year)middle range 382 covered Information Technology peers, as of FY2025
Position among covered Information Technology companies that report each metric (minimum 5 peers). A relative position within our covered catalog — not a valuation, quality, or investment judgment. A higher percentile is simply a higher value (for P/E, more expensive on earnings — never "better"). Informational only.
Top 10 scores & list membership
FROG is not currently in any published Top 10 list. Its scores are below.
Long-term score
51.0 #760 of 1,605 scored · #112 of 258 in Information Technology
Financial health 89th (debt to equity 0, free cash flow margin 26.9%) and growth 84th (3-year revenue CAGR 23.8%, revenue growth year over year 25%); weakest is profitability (10th, operating margin -14.5%, return on equity -7%).
Short-term score
59.8 #208 of 1,698 scored · #34 of 261 in Information Technology
Momentum 70th: MACD momentum is positive; catalysts 59th: analysts have raised their average price target by 0.1% since the prior reading; weakest is volume and participation 52nd: trading volume is about normal versus its 30-day average.
Scores as of 24 Aug 2026. Each bar is a percentile: how this company ranked against every company the score ranked, 0–100. A list is a published formula and its output, not a recommendation. Method version 3.
How JFROG LTD looks technically
JFROG LTD (FROG) is trading 41.9% above its 200-day average, the long-term trend line — a longer-term uptrend. Its 50-day average crossed above its 200-day average about 58 trading days ago — a "golden cross", a bullish long-term signal. A trend is forming but not yet strong — ADX, a 0–100 trend-strength gauge, is 23 (a reading of 25+ marks a strong trend). Momentum is neutral — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 53, neither overbought (above 70) nor oversold (below 30). It made a new 20-day high about 7 trading days ago.
Trend
8
| Distance from the 200-day | it is trading 41.9% above its 200-day average, the long-term trend line — a longer-term uptrend | +41.9% |
|---|---|---|
| 50-day moving average | its average price over the last 50 trading days — a short-term trend line — is $86.51 | $86.51 |
| 200-day moving average | its average price over the last 200 trading days — the long-term trend line — is $63.51 | $63.51 |
| Swing structure | each recent peak has been lower than the one before it and each dip deeper — the pattern chart-watchers call a downtrend, which describes where price has already been and not where it goes next | lower highs and lower lows |
| Last swing turn | its last significant turn was a swing high 10 calendar days ago — the swings before that are what the structure reading is measured on | 10 sessions |
| Wave structure | its recent swings can be read as a five-part downward sequence — what Elliott-wave chartists call an impulse — now in leg 3 of five; the labelling fails if price closes above 98.47. It is one of several labellings that fit, and it describes the swings already printed, not what comes next. The same swings also read as a three-part correction in leg C. | possible downward five-wave sequence, in wave 3 (one of several readings) |
| Since the 50/200 cross | its 50-day average crossed above its 200-day average about 58 trading days ago — a "golden cross", a bullish long-term signal | 58 sessions |
| Trend strength (14-day ADX) | a trend is forming but not yet strong — ADX, a 0–100 trend-strength gauge, is 23 (a reading of 25+ marks a strong trend) | 23.2 |
Momentum
3
| 14-day RSI | momentum is neutral — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 53, neither overbought (above 70) nor oversold (below 30) | 53.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Position in its 14-day range | it is trading in the upper half of its 14-day range ($79.50 to $98.47) — its "stochastic" reading is 56 out of 100, where 0 would mean closing exactly at the 14-session low and 100 exactly at the high. This measures WHERE the price sits inside its recent range, which is a different question from the RSI beside it: RSI is a momentum gauge, measuring how FAST the price has been moving, so a stock can drift quietly to the bottom of its range with an ordinary RSI, or fall sharply and still sit in the middle. It has been slipping within that range over the last few sessions. | 56.1 |
| Since the MACD crossed zero | MACD, a trend-momentum gauge, is in positive territory (momentum leaning bullish) | 12 sessions |
Range
12
| 52-week high | its highest closing price over the past year (about 252 trading days) was $99.22 | $99.22 |
|---|---|---|
| From the 52-week high | it is 9.2% below its 52-week high (its highest price of the past year) | -9.2% |
| Above the 52-week low | it is 164.7% above its 52-week low (its lowest price of the past year) | +164.7% |
| Below the 52-week high | it is 9.2% below its highest point of the past year | 9.2% |
| Since a 20-day breakout | it made a new 20-day high about 7 trading days ago | 7 sessions |
| Since a 55-day breakout | it made a new 55-day high about 36 trading days ago | 36 sessions |
| All-time high | its highest closing price on record is $99.22 (set on 2026-07-07) | $99.22 |
| Given back of the 52-week move | over the past year its closes ranged ($34.75 to $98.10), and it has given back only a small part of its rise from last year’s low — 13% of it. Chart-watchers call 61.8%-65% given back the "golden pocket" — for this company that is $56.92 to $58.95. It is watched widely enough that orders cluster there, which is the honest reason it matters; it is not a forecast. | 12.6% |
| From the all-time high | it is 9.2% below its all-time high | -9.2% |
| Nearest price level | it is trading 9.7% below a resistance level at $98.84 — a price it turned at twice since 2026-07-07, most recently on 2026-08-14. Since 2024-08-26 it has 16 such levels below the current price and 1 above. Levels like these describe where the price has reversed or paused before; they are not a forecast of where it will go. | +9.7% |
| All-time low | its lowest closing price on record is $16.36 (set on 2022-05-12) | $16.36 |
| Above the all-time low | it is 451.1% above its all-time low | +451.1% |
Volatility
5
| Band width vs its own 6 months | day-to-day price swings are about average versus its own recent 6-month history | 48th percentile |
|---|---|---|
| Typical daily range | in a typical session it travels about $5.27 between its high and its low — about 5.9% of its price. That is its "average true range" over the last 14 sessions, which also counts the distance from the previous close, so a day that opens well away from yesterday counts as the large move it was | $5.27 |
| Bollinger bands (20-day, ±2σ) | most of its recent trading has stayed between about $74.33 and $99.13 — the "Bollinger bands", a range drawn two standard deviations either side of its 20-day average price, which widens when the stock gets more volatile and narrows when it settles | $74.33 – $86.73 – $99.13 |
| Typical daily range (% of price) | its price moves about 5.9% in a typical session — about typical for the companies we cover. This is the average gap between a session's high and low over the last 14 sessions, counting overnight moves, expressed against the current price so it can be compared with companies trading at any price | 5.8% |
| Stretch from the 200-day average | it is trading 5.1 daily ranges above its 200-day average price (41.9% above it in plain percentage terms) — a way of asking how far it has stretched from its own average in units of how far it normally moves in a day, so a calm company and a jumpy one can be compared on the same scale | 5.1 daily ranges above its 200-day average |
Volume
1
| Volume vs its 30-day average | trading volume is about normal versus its 30-day average | 0.50× |
|---|
Analyst
2
| Change in the average price target | analysts have raised their average price target by 0.1% since the prior reading | +0.1% |
|---|---|---|
| Change in the consensus rating | the analyst consensus rating is unchanged since the prior reading | unchanged |
Candlestick patterns
2
| Since a doji | 3 sessions ago it opened and closed at almost the same price after trading through a wider range — a "doji", the classic picture of buyers and sellers finishing the session level | 3 sessions ago |
|---|---|---|
| Since a bullish engulfing | 1 session ago it opened below the previous session's close and finished above that session's open — a "bullish engulfing" pair, where one up day more than undid the down day before it | 1 session ago |
Price gaps
3
| Gap at the open | it opened on 2026-08-24 1.6% below the previous session's close — an overnight gap, the part of the move that happened while the market was shut, and had not traded back through that level by the close | -1.6% |
|---|---|---|
| Open gap | it gapped 15.9% above the previous close 11 sessions ago and has not traded back through the level it left behind at 83.04 — an "unfilled gap", which describes a price range no trade has since crossed and is not a forecast that it will be crossed | +15.9% |
| Gap filled | a 5.5% gap down opened on 2026-08-06 has been "filled" 12 sessions ago — price traded back through the level the gap left behind, and it closed again during the very session that opened it | 12 sessions ago |
Price streaks
1
| Closing streak | it closed lower in its latest session, after a session that did not close lower — a single down day rather than a run | 1 session down |
|---|
Relative strength
4
| vs market, 1 month | over the past 1 month this stock beat the market by 9.1 percentage points (the stock gained 12.5% while the market gained 3.3%) | +9.1% |
|---|---|---|
| vs market, 3 months | over the past 3 months this stock beat the market by 19.4 percentage points (the stock gained 21.8% while the market gained 2.4%) | +19.4% |
| vs market, 6 months | over the past 6 months this stock beat the market by 131.3 percentage points (the stock gained 142.4% while the market gained 11.1%) | +131.3% |
| vs market, 12 months | over the past 12 months this stock beat the market by 73.3 percentage points (the stock gained 91.6% while the market gained 18.3%) | +73.3% |
Signal agreement
2
| Bullish technical signals | 5 of the 9 technical signals we can compute for it are currently in a bullish state: a "golden cross" — its 50-day average is above its 200-day, trading above its 200-day average, MACD momentum is positive, outperforming the market over 6 months, trading above the Ichimoku cloud — these describe past price behaviour, not a forecast | 5 of 9 |
|---|---|---|
| Bearish technical signals | 0 of the 9 technical signals we can compute for it are currently in a bearish state — these describe past price behaviour, not a forecast | 0 of 9 |
Trend (Ichimoku cloud)
1
| Vs the Ichimoku cloud | trading 1.1% above the Ichimoku cloud — a band drawn from where its own highs and lows sat up to 2026-07-17 and projected forward over today's price, the side traders read as an established uptrend, with the band below acting as the level that would have to give way. The band itself is thick, spanning 19.2% of the share price, which is taken to mean a barrier that has held for a while and takes effort to cross. | +1.1% |
|---|
Volume-weighted price
2
| Vs this year’s average price paid | the price is 45% above the average price paid so far this year, so the typical buyer over that stretch is showing a gain. That average is $62.33 — a volume-weighted average of daily closes over 156 sessions, not a true tick-by-tick VWAP. | +44.6% |
|---|---|---|
| Vs the average paid since it last reported | the price is sitting right on the average price paid since it last reported on 2026-08-06 (its 8-K), so the typical buyer over that stretch is roughly break-even. That average is $90.11 — a volume-weighted average of daily closes over 13 sessions, not a true tick-by-tick VWAP. | +0.0% |
Price levels it has turned at before
FROG last closed at $90.14 on 2026-08-24. Since 2024-08-26 it has turned at 16 prices below its last close and 1 above; the 3 nearest below and the nearest above are listed, nearest first.
| Level | Side | Distance | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| $98.84 | Resistance | 9.7% above the last close | turned there twice · 2026-07-07 to 2026-08-14 |
| $72.10 | Support | 20.0% below the last close | turned there twice · 2026-05-08 to 2026-07-28 |
| $63.10 | Support | 30.0% below the last close | turned there twice · 2025-11-25 to 2025-12-17 |
| $56.64 | Support | 37.2% below the last close | turned there three times · 2025-11-21 to 2026-02-13 |
A level is a price this company reversed or paused at more than once — they describe past behaviour, not a forecast of where the price will go.
Wave structure
Its recent swings can be read as a five-part downward sequence — what Elliott-wave chartists call an impulse — now in leg 3 of five.
This labelling fails — stops being a possible reading at all — if it closes above $98.47.
This is one of several labellings that fit the same swings, so treat it as a reading rather than the reading. It was chosen from 2 labellings that survived the rules, counting shorter readings of the same bars.
On past moves of this shape the leg has usually ended somewhere between $54.65 and $71.39 — that is where it has tended to end if the count holds, not a forecast of where the price goes.
Alternate reading: The same swings also read as a three-part correction in leg C, which fails on a close above $98.47.
This reading has stood for 2 trading days, since 2026-08-21.
Read from daily closes as of 2026-08-24.
An Elliott-wave count describes the swings already printed and the level that would disprove it. It is not a forecast, a target, or advice.
Screens: Trading above the 200-day moving average · beating the market · Trading above the Ichimoku cloud · Elliott wave 3 candidates | Learn: moving average · golden cross · adx · rsi · breakout
Based on daily closing prices as of 2026-08-24. Describes past price behavior only — informational, not financial advice.
Analyst consensus
- Consensus ratingStrong Buy (1.38 mean, 1=Strong Buy…5=Strong Sell) — 21 analysts
- Mean price target$111.71 range $90.00 – $120.00; median $115.00
Analyst estimates, as of 2026-08-21. These are third-party analyst opinions and price targets, aggregated — not a recommendation, prediction, or advice from stocks-llm. Informational only.
Analyst EPS estimate for FROG
- Consensus EPS estimate$0.2318 next reporting period, as of 2026-08-21
Change over time is not available yet: it needs two readings of the same reporting period at least 30 days apart, and we have been recording these estimates since 2026-08-04. An estimate for a DIFFERENT quarter is not a revision, so a reading from before the last report is never compared with one after it.
The consensus estimate for the next reporting period, and how it has moved between readings of that SAME period. A change is measured only between readings estimating one period — when a company reports, the consensus moves to the next quarter and the two numbers are not comparable. Informational only, not a forecast and not advice.
Key risks (from latest filing)
["Geopolitical instability and military conflict in the Middle East affecting operations in Israel","Risk of business disruption or loss of key personnel due to regional conflicts","Reliance on subscription revenue growth and the successful adoption of the Enterprise Plus platform tier"]
What changed in the latest 10-Q
AI-assisted comparison of FROG's 10-Q filed 2026-05-08 against the prior one filed 2025-11-07.
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
- Added:
- In newer filing: reference to 'Artificial Intelligence/Machine Learning ("AI/ML") engineers and Artificial Intelligence agents' in platform description
- In newer filing: SaaS subscriptions contributed 51% of total revenue for Q1 2026 (vs. 43% for Q1 2025)
- In newer filing: Enterprise Plus subscription represented 58% of total revenue for Q1 2026 (vs. 55% for Q1 2025)
- In newer filing: revenue of $154.0 million for three months ended March 31, 2026 vs. $122.4 million for three months ended March 31, 2025
- In newer filing: net loss of $8.3 million for three months ended March 31, 2026 vs. $18.5 million for three months ended March 31, 2025
- In newer filing: detailed Middle East Conflict section mentioning June 2025 Israeli strikes against Iranian infrastructure, February 28, 2026 second offensive against Iran, Iranian retaliation, and April 8, 2026 temporary ceasefire
- Removed:
- Older filing reference to 'machine learning engineers, data scientists' changed to 'AI/ML engineers' in newer filing
- Older filing reference to 'MLOps teams' in multiple places replaced with 'AI/ML engineers' in newer filing
- Older filing SaaS revenue percentages (46% for three months and 45% for nine months ended September 30, 2025) not present in newer filing period comparison
- Older filing Enterprise Plus percentages (56% and 55% for three and nine months ended September 30, 2025) not directly comparable to newer filing Q1 2026 data
- Older filing revenue figures ($136.9 million and $109.1 million for three months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024) replaced by Q1 2026 figures in newer filing
- Older filing net loss figures ($16.4 million and $22.9 million for three months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024) replaced by Q1 2026 figures in newer filing
- Older filing Middle East Conflict section mentioning October 2025 ceasefire and Syrian political situation without details of subsequent escalations
- Reworded:
- Older filing describes platform as 'hybrid, universal, end-to-end software supply chain platform for delivering trusted, secure software updates from code to production'; newer filing describes it as 'foundational platform for managing and securing the software supply chain'
- Older filing references 'machine learning engineers, data scientists, and other business units'; newer filing references 'AI/ML engineers and Artificial Intelligence agents'
- Older filing mentions 'on-premise' while newer filing uses 'on-premises'
- Older filing references to 'MLOps teams' changed to 'AI/ML teams' in newer filing
- Middle East Conflict section expanded in newer filing with specific dates and details of 2026 escalation and ceasefire (February 28, 2026 offensive, April 8, 2026 ceasefire)
- Notes:
- The two filings report on different fiscal periods (Q1 2026 ended March 31, 2026 vs. Q3 2025 ended September 30, 2025), making some revenue and loss comparisons non-directly comparable
- Middle East Conflict section was substantially updated to reflect events occurring between the filing dates
- Text appears truncated at end of both excerpts, limiting full assessment of section completeness
Risk Factors
- Added:
- Added reference to 'DevGovOps' as a new core functionality area alongside DevOps, DevSecOps, and AI/MLOps in 2025 releases (newer filing)
- Added specific mention of 'agentic security capabilities' released in 2025 (newer filing)
- Added 'JFrog AppTrust for DevGovOps and compliance' as a 2025 release (newer filing)
- Added reference to 'new subscription bundles to align more closely with the emerging market needs around application security and AI development' (newer filing)
- Added disclosure of war involving 'Israel, the U.S., Iran, and Hezbollah' in geopolitical risks (newer filing)
- Removed:
- Removed reference to 'war in Ukraine' from geopolitical risks discussion (was in older filing, removed in newer)
- Removed specific mention of 'JFrog Runtime Security' as a 2024 release (older filing mentioned this; newer filing does not)
- Removed specific mention of 'Qwak' acquisition as foundational technology (older filing mentioned; newer filing does not)
- Reworded:
- Changed 'market acceptance of our products' to 'customers' adoption of our products' in summary risk factors (newer vs. older)
- Changed revenue period from 'three months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024' to 'three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025' with updated figures: $154.0M and $122.4M (newer)
- Changed annual revenue period from 'nine months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024' to 'years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024' with updated figures: $531.8M and $428.5M (newer)
- Updated employee headcount from '1,400 as of December 31, 2023 to approximately 1,600 as of December 31, 2024' to '1,600 as of December 31, 2024 to approximately 1,800 as of December 31, 2025' (newer)
- Updated ARR metrics date from 'September 30, 2025' to 'March 31, 2026' with revised figures: 1,225 customers (from 1,121) with $100K+ ARR and 80 customers (from 71) with $1M+ ARR (newer)
- Changed 'relationships with various partners' to 'relationships with cloud providers' (newer)
- Changed product feature description from '2024, we released' to '2025, we released' with expansion to include DevGovOps and AI/MLOps terminology (newer)
- Changed 'MLOps' to 'Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning operations ("AI/MLOps")' for clarity (newer)
- Notes:
- The newer filing appears truncated at 'Any failure to manage o' suggesting text may be cut off in the source provided
- The older filing also appears truncated at similar point with 'Any failure to manage our anticipated growth and related organizational changes in a manner that' suggesting comparable text cutoff
AI-assisted comparison of two SEC filing sections. It describes wording and theme changes only, makes no materiality, legal, or investment judgement, and is not financial advice. Informational only — not financial advice.
Insider activity (SEC Form 4)
0 open-market purchases and 51 open-market sales by insiders in the last 90 days.
- Last 90 days0 buys · 51 sells ($81M) — 7 selling insiders
- Last 180 days0 buys · 69 sells ($99M) — 9 selling insiders
Activity heuristic: net selling (a transparent product heuristic from the counts above, not a prediction or advice)
Most recent open-market transaction: 2026-07-23. As of 2026-08-25.
View full insider trading history → View SEC Form 3/4/5 filingsAsk about FROG's insider activity →
Only open-market purchases (SEC code P) and sales (code S) are counted here. Option exercises, vesting/awards, gifts, and shares withheld for taxes are excluded — they are compensation or mechanical, not open-market conviction. Sales may be planned and non-discretionary (e.g. a Rule 10b5-1 plan) and are not necessarily bearish; open-market buying is not a recommendation to buy. Informational only — not financial advice.
Short interest (FINRA)
FROG had 9,393,448 shares of reported short interest as of the 2026-07-31 FINRA settlement date (delayed, bi-monthly; not real-time).
FROG had 7.62% of its shares outstanding sold short as of the 2026-07-31 FINRA settlement date (percent of FLOAT would be higher — float is not disclosed in the source). FINRA reported 4.19 days to cover at the same settlement.
- Reported short interest (shares) 9,393,448
- Short interest (% of shares outstanding) 7.62%
- Prior settlement (shares) 10,930,781
- Reported change -14.06%
- Days to cover (reported) 4.19
Reported to FINRA as of the 2026-07-31 settlement date. Short interest is reported to FINRA and published on a delayed, bi-monthly schedule (as of a settlement date, disseminated roughly eight business days later) — it is NOT real-time, does not cover every venue or all US trading, and is not a short-squeeze prediction or investment advice. Days-to-cover is the value FINRA reports; percent of float is not shown because the source file carries no share-count denominator — where a percent appears it is of shares OUTSTANDING, the larger base, and is therefore a floor on percent of float. Informational only — not financial advice.
Competitors & peers
- Sonatype
- GitHub (MSFT)
- GitLab (GTLB)
- Snyk
- CloudBees
AI-enriched competitor set. Linked names are companies covered by stocks-llm; other named peers are shown for reference only.
Compare FROG vs…
Frequently asked questions
What does JFROG LTD (FROG) do?
JFrog provides a foundational platform for software supply chain management, enabling organizations to unify the consumption, creation, and continuous distribution of software. The company supports hybrid environments, offering solutions for software development, security, governance, and distribution to diverse teams including developers, security professionals, and AI/ML engineers.
What sector is JFROG LTD (FROG) in?
JFROG LTD (FROG) is classified in the Information Technology sector. Its industry is DevOps and Software Supply Chain Management. It trades on NASDAQ.
Who are JFROG LTD's (FROG) competitors?
Notable peers of JFROG LTD (FROG) include Sonatype, GitHub, GitLab, Snyk and CloudBees. This peer set is informational only — not financial advice.
Is JFROG LTD (FROG) overbought or oversold right now?
JFROG LTD (FROG) is currently neither overbought nor oversold — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 53, in the neutral middle (as of 2026-08-24). RSI describes recent price momentum, not a forecast — informational only, not financial advice.
Where does stocks-llm's data on FROG come from?
Fundamentals and prices come from market data, as of 2026-08-24; company filings and profile facts come from SEC EDGAR. All figures are delayed daily-close data shown with their as-of date — informational only, not financial advice.
Fundamentals: market data, as of 2026-08-24. Filings: SEC EDGAR. Prices are delayed daily-close data.
Last updated 2026-08-24.
Informational only — NOT financial advice. All figures are delayed daily-close data from SEC EDGAR & market data, shown with their as-of date.