IonQ (IONQ)
Information Technology · Quantum Computing · NYSE
IonQ is a leader in trapped-ion quantum computing, providing cloud-based access to high-performance quantum processors for research and commercial use.
What IonQ does
IonQ, Inc. is a developer of quantum computing systems designed to solve complex computational problems. The company offers cloud-based access to its trapped-ion quantum computers for various commercial and research applications. Additionally, IonQ is engaged in developing quantum networking and specialized hardware to advance the field of quantum information processing.
Themes: quantum computing, high-performance computing, emerging technology
Fundamentals
- Price$31.26 as of 2026-10-20 close
- Market cap$11.9B as of 2026-07-29 (share count; price 2026-10-20)
- 1-year return-47.8% 2025-10-20 close $59.94 → 2026-10-20 close $31.26
- P/En/a negative earnings
- Net margin-392.6% FY2025, SEC XBRL
- ROE-13.4% FY2025, SEC XBRL
- ROICn/a No figure: its pre-tax income was zero or negative, so there is no tax rate to apply.
- Debt / equityn/a No figure: its filing tags none of the debt lines we read, which is not evidence of zero debt.
- Revenue growth (YoY)+201.8% FY2025, SEC XBRL
- Revenue CAGR (3y)+126.9% SEC XBRL
- Beta2.92 as of 2026-09-02
- Last reported earnings2026-08-05 SEC EDGAR Form 8-K (Item 2.02)
How IONQ compares in its sector
- net profit marginbottom 10% 379 covered Information Technology peers, as of 2026-09-02
- operating marginbottom 10% 374 covered Information Technology peers, as of 2026-09-02
- return on equitybottom 25% 369 covered Information Technology peers, as of 2026-09-02
- 3-year revenue CAGRtop 10% 383 covered Information Technology peers
- free cash flow (absolute dollars, latest fiscal year)bottom 10% 380 covered Information Technology peers, as of FY2025
Position among covered Information Technology companies that report each metric (minimum 5 peers). A relative position within our covered catalog — not a valuation, quality, or investment judgment. A higher percentile is simply a higher value (for P/E, more expensive on earnings — never "better"). Informational only.
Top 10 scores & list membership
IONQ is not currently in any published Top 10 list. Its scores are below.
Top 10 score
31.2 #1218 of 1,265 scored · #180 of 191 in Information Technology
Growth 100th (3-year revenue CAGR 126.9%, revenue growth year over year 201.9%) and valuation 47th (price to book 3.6); weakest is financial health (2nd, free cash flow margin -230.4%).
Scores as of 20 Oct 2026. Each bar is a percentile: how this company ranked against every company the score ranked, 0–100. A list is a published formula and its output, not a recommendation. Method version 4.
Quarterly results
| Quarter | Revenue | Operating income | Net income | Diluted EPS | Operating cash flow | Capex |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 FY2026 2026-06-30 | $80M | -$337M | -$1.9B | -$5.08 | -$104M† | $10M† |
| Q1 FY2026 2026-03-31 | $65M | -$272M | $805M | $2.07 | -$151M | $8M |
| Q4 FY2025 2025-12-31 | $62M† | -$229M† | $754M† | $3.07† | -$75M† | $9M† |
| Q3 FY2025 2025-09-30 | $40M | -$169M | -$1.1B | -$3.58 | -$123M† | $4M† |
| Q2 FY2025 2025-06-30 | $21M | -$161M | -$177M | -$0.70 | -$53M† | $1M† |
| Q1 FY2025 2025-03-31 | $8M | -$76M | -$32M | -$0.14 | -$33M | $2M |
| Q4 FY2024 2024-12-31 | $12M† | -$78M† | -$202M† | -$0.95† | -$39M† | $4M† |
| Q3 FY2024 2024-09-30 | $12M | -$53M | -$52M | -$0.24 | -$19M† | $4M† |
† Not filed as a discrete quarter: derived from the company's own year-to-date figures (for example the fourth quarter as the fiscal year minus the first nine months). A derived per-share figure is approximate, because the share count moves within the year.
Balance sheet at 2026-06-30
- Cash and equivalents$1.2B
- Short-term investments$883M
- Total debtnot shown the filing tags none of the debt lines we read — not evidence of zero debt
From the company's own SEC 10-Q and 10-K filings (XBRL), re-read every week. Figures in US dollars as filed; informational only — not financial advice.
How IonQ looks technically
IonQ (IONQ) is trading 26.9% below its 200-day average, the long-term trend line — a long-term downtrend. Its 50-day average crossed below its 200-day average about 44 trading days ago — a "death cross", a bearish long-term signal. A strong downtrend is in place — ADX, a 0–100 trend-strength gauge, is 26, with sellers in control. Momentum is neutral — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 33, neither overbought (above 70) nor oversold (below 30). MACD, a trend-momentum gauge, turned bearish about 9 trading days ago (its momentum flipped negative). It made a new 20-day low about 2 trading days ago. It is 63.1% below its highest point of the past year.
Trend
7
| Distance from the 200-day | it is trading 26.9% below its 200-day average, the long-term trend line — a long-term downtrend | -26.9% |
|---|---|---|
| 50-day moving average | its average price over the last 50 trading days — a short-term trend line — is $40.26 | $40.26 |
| 200-day moving average | its average price over the last 200 trading days — the long-term trend line — is $42.73 | $42.73 |
| Swing structure | its recent peaks and dips disagree — one of them is rising while the other is not, so there is no clean up or down pattern in the swings | mixed — one of the two is not confirming |
| Last swing turn | its last significant turn was a swing high 22 calendar days ago — the swings before that are what the structure reading is measured on | 22 sessions |
| Since the 50/200 cross | its 50-day average crossed below its 200-day average about 44 trading days ago — a "death cross", a bearish long-term signal | 44 sessions |
| Trend strength (14-day ADX) | a strong downtrend is in place — ADX, a 0–100 trend-strength gauge, is 26, with sellers in control | 25.8 |
Momentum
3
| 14-day RSI | momentum is neutral — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 33, neither overbought (above 70) nor oversold (below 30) | 32.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Position in its 14-day range | it is trading near the bottom of its 14-day range ($30.03 to $45.40) — its "stochastic" reading is 8 out of 100, where 0 would mean closing exactly at the 14-session low and 100 exactly at the high. This measures WHERE the price sits inside its recent range, which is a different question from the RSI beside it: RSI is a momentum gauge, measuring how FAST the price has been moving, so a stock can drift quietly to the bottom of its range with an ordinary RSI, or fall sharply and still sit in the middle. It has been climbing within that range over the last few sessions. | 8.0 |
| Since the MACD crossed zero | MACD, a trend-momentum gauge, turned bearish about 9 trading days ago (its momentum flipped negative) | 9 sessions |
Range
12
| 52-week high | its highest closing price over the past year (about 252 trading days) was $84.64 | $84.64 |
|---|---|---|
| From the 52-week high | it is 63.1% below its 52-week high (its highest price of the past year) | -63.1% |
| Above the 52-week low | it is 20.7% above its 52-week low (its lowest price of the past year) | +20.7% |
| Below the 52-week high | it is 63.1% below its highest point of the past year | 63.1% |
| Since a 20-day breakout | it made a new 20-day low about 2 trading days ago | 2 sessions |
| Since a 55-day breakout | it made a new 55-day low about 2 trading days ago | 2 sessions |
| All-time high | its highest closing price on record is $84.64 (set on 2025-10-13) | $84.64 |
| Given back of the 52-week move | over the past year its closes ranged ($26.59 to $82.09), and it has recovered only a small part of its fall from last year’s high — 8% of it. Chart-watchers call 61.8%-65% given back the "golden pocket" — for this company that is $60.89 to $62.66. It is watched widely enough that orders cluster there, which is the honest reason it matters; it is not a forecast. | 8.4% |
| From the all-time high | it is 63.1% below its all-time high | -63.1% |
| Nearest price level | it is trading 1.8% below a resistance level at $31.83 — a price it turned at twice since 2025-04-25, most recently on 2026-07-29. Since 2024-10-21 it has 3 such levels below the current price and 12 above. Levels like these describe where the price has reversed or paused before; they are not a forecast of where it will go. | +1.8% |
| All-time low | its lowest closing price on record is $3.04 (set on 2022-12-28) | $3.04 |
| Above the all-time low | it is 928.3% above its all-time low | +928.3% |
Volatility
5
| Band width vs its own 6 months | day-to-day price swings are wider than usual versus its own recent 6-month history (wider than about 75% of it) | 75th percentile |
|---|---|---|
| Typical daily range | in a typical session it travels about $2.72 between its high and its low — about 8.7% of its price. That is its "average true range" over the last 14 sessions, which also counts the distance from the previous close, so a day that opens well away from yesterday counts as the large move it was | $2.72 |
| Bollinger bands (20-day, ±2σ) | most of its recent trading has stayed between about $29.08 and $49.94 — the "Bollinger bands", a range drawn two standard deviations either side of its 20-day average price, which widens when the stock gets more volatile and narrows when it settles | $29.08 – $39.51 – $49.94 |
| Typical daily range (% of price) | its price moves about 8.7% in a typical session — among the most volatile in the catalog. This is the average gap between a session's high and low over the last 14 sessions, counting overnight moves, expressed against the current price so it can be compared with companies trading at any price | 8.7% |
| Stretch from the 200-day average | it is trading 4.2 daily ranges below its 200-day average price (26.9% below it in plain percentage terms) — a way of asking how far it has stretched from its own average in units of how far it normally moves in a day, so a calm company and a jumpy one can be compared on the same scale | 4.2 daily ranges below its 200-day average |
Volume
1
| Volume vs its 30-day average | trading volume is about normal versus its 30-day average | 0.79× |
|---|
Analyst
2
| Change in the average price target | analysts have cut their average price target by 3.9% since the prior reading | -3.9% |
|---|---|---|
| Change in the consensus rating | the analyst consensus rating is unchanged since the prior reading | unchanged |
Candlestick patterns
2
| Since a doji | 7 sessions ago it opened and closed at almost the same price after trading through a wider range — a "doji", the classic picture of buyers and sellers finishing the session level | 7 sessions ago |
|---|---|---|
| Since a bullish engulfing | 3 sessions ago it opened below the previous session's close and finished above that session's open — a "bullish engulfing" pair, where one up day more than undid the down day before it | 3 sessions ago |
Price gaps
3
| Gap at the open | it opened on 2026-10-20 1.6% below the previous session's close — an overnight gap, the part of the move that happened while the market was shut, and traded back through that level before the close | -1.6% |
|---|---|---|
| Open gap | it gapped 3.8% below the previous close 2 sessions ago and has not traded back through the level it left behind at 34.35 — an "unfilled gap", which describes a price range no trade has since crossed and is not a forecast that it will be crossed | -3.8% |
| Gap filled | a 3.4% gap up opened on 2026-10-19 has been "filled" 1 session ago — price traded back through the level the gap left behind, and it closed again during the very session that opened it | 1 session ago |
Price streaks
1
| Closing streak | it closed higher in its latest session, after a session that did not close higher — a single up day rather than a run | 1 session up |
|---|
Relative strength
4
| vs market, 1 month | over the past 1 month this stock lagged the market by 21.1 percentage points (the stock lost 20.1% while the market gained 1.0%) | -21.1% |
|---|---|---|
| vs market, 3 months | over the past 3 months this stock lagged the market by 12.3 percentage points (the stock lost 8.7% while the market gained 3.6%) | -12.3% |
| vs market, 6 months | over the past 6 months this stock lagged the market by 43.8 percentage points (the stock lost 35.3% while the market gained 8.5%) | -43.8% |
| vs market, 12 months | over the past 12 months this stock lagged the market by 62.4 percentage points (the stock lost 47.8% while the market gained 14.6%) | -62.4% |
Signal agreement
2
| Bullish technical signals | 1 of the 9 technical signals we can compute for it is currently in a bullish state: near the bottom of its 14-day range (oversold) — these describe past price behaviour, not a forecast | 1 of 9 |
|---|---|---|
| Bearish technical signals | 7 of the 9 technical signals we can compute for it are currently in a bearish state: a "death cross" — its 50-day average is below its 200-day, trading below its 200-day average, a fresh 20-day low, MACD momentum is negative, a strong downtrend, with sellers in control, lagging the market over 6 months, trading below the Ichimoku cloud — these describe past price behaviour, not a forecast | 7 of 9 |
Trend (Ichimoku cloud)
1
| Vs the Ichimoku cloud | trading 23% below the Ichimoku cloud — a band drawn from where its own highs and lows sat up to 2026-09-14 and projected forward over today's price, the side traders read as an established downtrend, with the band above acting as the level that would have to be cleared. The band itself is thick, spanning 8.6% of the share price, which is taken to mean a barrier that has held for a while and takes effort to cross. | -23.0% |
|---|
Volume-weighted price
2
| Vs this year’s average price paid | the price is 29% below the average price paid so far this year, so the typical buyer over that stretch is under water. That average is $43.99 — a volume-weighted average of daily closes over 196 sessions, not a true tick-by-tick VWAP. | -28.9% |
|---|---|---|
| Vs the average paid since it last reported | the price is 22% below the average price paid since it last reported on 2026-08-05 (its 8-K), so the typical buyer over that stretch is under water. That average is $40.17 — a volume-weighted average of daily closes over 54 sessions, not a true tick-by-tick VWAP. | -22.2% |
Double top, bearish — broke down · entry $36.75 · 45 sessions in
Price levels it has turned at before
IONQ last closed at $31.26 on 2026-10-20. Since 2024-10-21 it has turned at 3 prices below its last close and 12 above; the 3 nearest below and the 3 nearest above are listed, nearest first.
| Level | Side | Distance | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| $31.83 | Resistance | 1.8% above the last close | turned there twice · 2025-04-25 to 2026-07-29 |
| $30.08 | Support | 3.8% below the last close | turned there twice · 2026-02-05 to 2026-02-23 |
| $28.04 | Support | 10.3% below the last close | turned there three times · 2024-12-11 to 2025-04-14 |
| $34.88 | Resistance | 11.6% above the last close | turned there twice · 2025-08-20 to 2026-09-14 |
| $35.90 | Resistance | 14.8% above the last close | turned there three times · 2025-01-28 to 2025-06-16 |
| $25.91 | Support | 17.1% below the last close | turned there twice · 2025-01-08 to 2026-03-30 |
A level is a price this company reversed or paused at more than once — they describe past behaviour, not a forecast of where the price will go.
Wave structure
No Elliott-wave labelling currently fits its swings: the recent highs and lows do not satisfy the three rules a five-wave count has to obey, so there is no count to show rather than a count we are unsure about.
Read from daily closes as of 2026-10-20.
An Elliott-wave count describes the swings already printed and the level that would disprove it. It is not a forecast, a target, or advice.
Screens: Trading below the 200-day moving average · Trading below the 50-day moving average · Pulled back from the 12-month high · Broke down to a new 20-day low · Analyst price target recently CUT · lagging the market | Learn: moving average · golden cross · adx · rsi · macd · breakout · fifty two week high low
Based on daily closing prices as of 2026-10-20. Describes past price behavior only — informational, not financial advice.
Analyst consensus
- Consensus ratingStrong Buy (1.36 mean, 1=Strong Buy…5=Strong Sell) — 14 analysts
- Mean price target$64.06 range $41.85 – $100.00; median $62.50
Analyst estimates, as of 2026-10-16. These are third-party analyst opinions and price targets, aggregated — not a recommendation, prediction, or advice from stocks-llm. Informational only.
Analyst EPS estimate for IONQ
- Consensus EPS estimate-$0.3373 next reporting period, as of 2026-10-16
- Estimate change, 30 days-$0.02127 from -$0.316, on 2026-09-11, 35-day window
- Readings revised upward11% of 9 comparable readings
The consensus estimate for the next reporting period, and how it has moved between readings of that SAME period. A change is measured only between readings estimating one period — when a company reports, the consensus moves to the next quarter and the two numbers are not comparable. Informational only, not a forecast and not advice.
Key risks (from latest filing)
["Significant volatility in net income due to fair value adjustments of warrant liabilities.","Substantial ongoing investment in research and development with continued operating losses.","The market for quantum computing is nascent and the company's technology faces significant commercialization challenges."]
What changed in the latest 10-Q
AI-assisted comparison of IONQ's 10-Q filed 2026-08-10 against the prior one filed 2026-05-07.
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
- Added:
- Newer filing (2026-08-10) states losses from operations were $608.8 million and $236.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively; older filing (2026-05-07) stated losses from operations were $271.5 million and $75.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025, respectively.
- Newer filing (2026-08-10) states accumulated deficit as of June 30, 2026 was $2,256.5 million; older filing (2026-05-07) stated accumulated deficit as of March 31, 2026 was $388.7 million.
- Newer filing (2026-08-10) adds a new sentence: 'On July 31, 2026, we completed our previously-announced acquisition of SkyWater Technology, Inc. ("SkyWater"), a U.S.-based semiconductor foundry.'
- Newer filing (2026-08-10) describes the SkyWater acquisition as completed and states the belief that 'the acquisition will advance our quantum computing technology roadmap by providing access to SkyWater's U.S.-based semiconductor foundry capabilities, advanced packaging expertise and Technology as a Service platform.'
- Removed:
- Older filing (2026-05-07) contained a paragraph stating that on January 25, 2026, IonQ entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger with SkyWater Technology, Inc., Iris Merger Subsidiary 1 Inc. and Iris Merger Subsidiary 2 LLC, describing the proposed acquisition, closing conditions, HSR Act waiting period, regulatory approvals, and expectation that the Mergers would be completed in the second or third quarter of 2026; this paragraph does not appear in the newer filing (2026-08-10).
- Reworded:
- Newer filing (2026-08-10) describes the SkyWater transaction as a completed acquisition ('On July 31, 2026, we completed our previously-announced acquisition of SkyWater Technology, Inc.'); older filing (2026-05-07) described it as a proposed transaction with closing conditions and an expected completion in the second or third quarter of 2026.
- Newer filing (2026-08-10) uses the phrase 'the acquisition will advance' (future effect attributed to completed acquisition); older filing (2026-05-07) used 'the proposed acquisition will advance' (future effect attributed to proposed acquisition).
- Notes:
- The provided texts are excerpts and appear truncated; the newer excerpt ends mid-sentence in the ASC 606 discussion ('1. Identify t'), and the older excerpt ends mid-sentence in the Revenue section ('from consulting services related to'). Changes beyond these excerpts cannot be assessed.
- The older filing excerpt's loss figures are for three-month periods while the newer filing excerpt's loss figures are for six-month periods, so the numerical values are not directly comparable as a like-for-like change.
Risk Factors
- Added:
- Newer filing (filed 2026-08-10) adds a new risk factor titled 'We may not achieve the intended benefits of the SkyWater Acquisition, and it could disrupt our current plans or operations.'
- Newer filing (filed 2026-08-10) adds a new risk factor titled 'The market price of our common stock after the SkyWater Acquisition may be affected by factors different from those affecting the price of our common stock before the SkyWater Acquisition.'
- Newer filing (filed 2026-08-10) adds a new risk factor titled 'The completion of the SkyWater Acquisition may result in a loss of customers, distributors, suppliers, vendors, landlords and other business partners and may result in the termination of existing contracts.'
- Newer filing (filed 2026-08-10) adds a new risk factor titled 'If any of the semiconductor foundries that we acquired in the SkyWater Acquisition are damaged or become inoperable, we would be unable to develop or produce wafers in a timely manner, if at all, and our business would be materially adversely affected.'
- Newer filing (filed 2026-08-10) adds a new risk factor titled 'If the SkyWater business does not achieve satisfactory yields or quality, our reputation and customer relationships could be harmed.'
- Newer filing (filed 2026-08-10) adds the beginning of a new risk factor titled 'Our customers may cancel their orders, change production quantities or delay production, and if we fail to forecast demand accurately, we may incur supply shortages or lose revenue.'
- Reworded:
- Newer filing (filed 2026-08-10) states 'Other than as set forth below, there have been no material changes to the risk factors previously disclosed...' whereas older filing (filed 2026-05-07) stated 'There have been no material changes to the risk factors previously disclosed...' without the phrase 'Other than as set forth below'.
- Notes:
- The newer filing text appears truncated at the end of the last risk factor ('Our customers may cancel their orders...'), and the older filing text includes sections beyond Risk Factors (Items 2-6 and exhibits).
- Only the Risk Factors sections were compared; other content in the older filing (Items 2-6, exhibits, and solicitation information) is outside the scope of this section comparison.
AI-assisted comparison of two SEC filing sections. It describes wording and theme changes only, makes no materiality, legal, or investment judgement, and is not financial advice. Informational only — not financial advice.
Insider activity (SEC Form 4)
0 open-market purchases and 1 open-market sale by insiders in the last 90 days, of which we have read Form 4 filings through 2026-10-16. The 5 days since 2026-10-16 have not been checked yet.
- Last 90 days · read to 2026-10-160 buys · 1 sell ($89564) — 1 selling insider
- Last 180 days · read to 2026-10-160 buys · 5 sells ($791053) — 4 selling insiders
Activity heuristic: net selling (a transparent product heuristic from the counts above, not a prediction or advice)
Most recent open-market transaction: 2026-09-10. Based on Form 4 filings read through 2026-10-16; anything filed since is not yet included.
View full insider trading history → View SEC Form 3/4/5 filingsAsk about IONQ's insider activity →
Only open-market purchases (SEC code P) and sales (code S) are counted here. Option exercises, vesting/awards, gifts, and shares withheld for taxes are excluded — they are compensation or mechanical, not open-market conviction. Sales may be planned and non-discretionary (e.g. a Rule 10b5-1 plan) and are not necessarily bearish; open-market buying is not a recommendation to buy. Informational only — not financial advice.
U.S. House trading disclosures
U.S. House members publicly disclose their own, their spouse's, and dependent children's stock transactions under the STOCK Act. We hold 1 matched disclosure for IONQ from U.S. House Clerk Periodic Transaction Report filings.
U.S. House trading disclosures →Institutional ownership (13F)
4 institutional 13F filers reported holding IONQ as of 2026-06-30 (quarter-end position, filed within 45 days).
- Distinct 13F filers 4
- Reported shares held 43,617,210
- Reported value $2,323,052,583
reported quarterly holdings change (2026-03-31 → 2026-06-30): 0 new, 1 increased, 3 decreased, 1 exited. Change counts cover only managers that filed 13F reports in BOTH quarters, derived between two quarter-end snapshots — not same-day trades; a single manager is never said to have "bought" or "sold".
Institutional holdings are quarter-end long positions reported on SEC Form 13F-HR, filed up to 45 days after the quarter ends — they are delayed, are not real-time trades, exclude short positions and most non-US securities, and are not investment advice. Any increase/decrease is a reported change between two quarterly snapshots, not a same-day purchase or sale. These are quarter-end snapshots from the 13F filings on SEC EDGAR, filed within 45 days — not real-time, and any change is a difference between two quarterly reports, not a same-day trade. Informational only — not financial advice.
Ask about IONQ's institutional holders → See what each manager we track holds →
Short interest (FINRA)
IONQ had 40,638,080 shares of reported short interest as of the 2026-09-30 FINRA settlement date (delayed, bi-monthly; not real-time).
IONQ had 10.7% of its shares outstanding sold short as of the 2026-09-30 FINRA settlement date (percent of FLOAT would be higher — float is not disclosed in the source). FINRA reported 1.41 days to cover at the same settlement.
- Reported short interest (shares) 40,638,080
- Short interest (% of shares outstanding) 10.7%
- Prior settlement (shares) 40,486,062
- Reported change 0.38%
- Days to cover (reported) 1.41
Reported to FINRA as of the 2026-09-30 settlement date. Short interest is reported to FINRA and published on a delayed, bi-monthly schedule (as of a settlement date, disseminated roughly eight business days later) — it is NOT real-time, does not cover every venue or all US trading, and is not a short-squeeze prediction or investment advice. Days-to-cover is the value FINRA reports; percent of float is not shown because the source file carries no share-count denominator — where a percent appears it is of shares OUTSTANDING, the larger base, and is therefore a floor on percent of float. Informational only — not financial advice.
Competitors & peers
- Rigetti Computing (RGTI)
- D-Wave Quantum (QBTS)
- IBM (IBM)
- Alphabet / Google Quantum AI (GOOGL)
- Microsoft Azure Quantum (MSFT)
- Amazon Braket (AMZN)
AI-enriched competitor set. Linked names are companies covered by stocks-llm; other named peers are shown for reference only.
Compare IONQ vs…
IonQ is found in…
Frequently asked questions
What does IonQ (IONQ) do?
IonQ, Inc. is a developer of quantum computing systems designed to solve complex computational problems. The company offers cloud-based access to its trapped-ion quantum computers for various commercial and research applications. Additionally, IonQ is engaged in developing quantum networking and specialized hardware to advance the field of quantum information processing.
What sector is IonQ (IONQ) in?
IonQ (IONQ) is classified in the Information Technology sector. Its industry is Quantum Computing. It trades on NYSE.
Who are IonQ's (IONQ) competitors?
Notable peers of IonQ (IONQ) include Rigetti Computing, D-Wave Quantum, IBM, Alphabet / Google Quantum AI and Microsoft Azure Quantum. This peer set is informational only — not financial advice.
Has there been recent U.S. House stock trading in IONQ?
Yes — we hold 1 matched STOCK Act disclosure for IONQ from U.S. House Clerk Periodic Transaction Report filings. These are legally-required disclosures (often filed 30–45 days after the trade), may belong to a U.S. House member, their spouse, or a dependent child, and are not an indicator of company performance or investment advice.
Is IonQ (IONQ) overbought or oversold right now?
IonQ (IONQ) is currently neither overbought nor oversold — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 33, in the neutral middle (as of 2026-10-20). RSI describes recent price momentum, not a forecast — informational only, not financial advice.
Where does stocks-llm's data on IONQ come from?
Fundamentals come from SEC XBRL company filings for the figures marked with a fiscal year, and market data, as of 2026-09-02 for the rest; prices are market data, as of 2026-09-02; company filings and profile facts come from SEC EDGAR. All figures are delayed daily-close data shown with their as-of date — informational only, not financial advice.
Fundamentals: SEC XBRL company filings for the figures marked with a fiscal year, and market data, as of 2026-09-02 for the rest. Filings: SEC EDGAR. Prices are delayed daily-close data.
Last updated 2026-10-20.
Informational only — NOT financial advice. All figures are delayed daily-close data from SEC EDGAR & market data, shown with their as-of date.