Keysight Technologies (KEYS)
Information Technology · Electronic Test & Measurement Equipment · NYSE
Keysight Technologies is a premier provider of sophisticated electronic design, simulation, and test solutions that accelerate innovation in aerospace, defense, and global communications networks.
What Keysight Technologies does
Keysight Technologies provides electronic design, emulation, and test software, instrumentation, and systems for the communications and electronics industries. The company operates through two segments, Communications Solutions Group (CSG) and Electronic Industrial Solutions Group (EISG), serving customers in aerospace, defense, government, wireless, wireline, and data center ecosystems. Its solutions support the entire product lifecycle, from initial design and simulation to validation, manufacturing, and network optimization.
Themes: 5G / 6G communications, Aerospace & defense modernization, Data center / cloud infrastructure optimization, Wireless network testing, Electronic design & validation
Fundamentals
- Price$316.13 as of 2026-08-21 close
- Market cap$54.0B as of 2026-08-21
- 1-year return+96.9% 2025-08-21 close $160.59 → 2026-08-21 close $316.13
- P/E57.37 as of 2026-08-24
- Net margin+17.3% as of 2026-08-24
- Gross margin+63.7% as of 2026-08-24
- ROE+17.5% as of 2026-08-24
- Debt / equity0.40 as of 2026-08-24
- Revenue growth (YoY)+19.2% as of 2026-08-24
- Revenue CAGR (3y)-0.3% SEC XBRL
- Beta1.19 as of 2026-08-24
- Last reported earnings2026-08-18 SEC EDGAR Form 8-K (Item 2.02)
How KEYS compares in its sector
- price-to-earnings ratiomiddle range 265 covered Information Technology peers, as of 2026-08-24
- net profit margintop 25% 405 covered Information Technology peers, as of 2026-08-24
- operating margintop 25% 405 covered Information Technology peers, as of 2026-08-24
- gross marginmiddle range 403 covered Information Technology peers, as of 2026-08-24
- return on equitytop 25% 405 covered Information Technology peers, as of 2026-08-24
- 3-year revenue CAGRmiddle range 386 covered Information Technology peers
- free cash flow (absolute dollars, latest fiscal year)top 25% 382 covered Information Technology peers, as of FY2025
Position among covered Information Technology companies that report each metric (minimum 5 peers). A relative position within our covered catalog — not a valuation, quality, or investment judgment. A higher percentile is simply a higher value (for P/E, more expensive on earnings — never "better"). Informational only.
Top 10 scores & list membership
KEYS is not currently in any published Top 10 list. Its scores are below.
Long-term score
Not scored for the long-term list: no shareholder return data.
Short-term score
46.8 #1000 of 1,704 scored · #143 of 261 in Information Technology
Catalysts 57th: analysts have raised their average price target by 6.9% since the prior reading; setup 48th: no fresh 20-day breakout up or down; weakest is trend 41st: it is trading 5.0% below its 50-day average, the short-term trend line.
Scores as of 21 Aug 2026. Each bar is a percentile: how this company ranked against every company the score ranked, 0–100. A list is a published formula and its output, not a recommendation. Method version 2.
How Keysight Technologies looks technically
Keysight Technologies (KEYS) is trading 12.9% above its 200-day average, the long-term trend line — a longer-term uptrend. Its 50-day average crossed above its 200-day average about 280 trading days ago — a "golden cross", a bullish long-term signal. There is no clear trend right now — the price is choppy (ADX, a 0–100 trend-strength gauge, is 16, below the 25 that marks a real trend), though sellers have been pushing harder than buyers lately — pressure, not a trend. Momentum is neutral — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 42, neither overbought (above 70) nor oversold (below 30). MACD, a trend-momentum gauge, turned bearish about 2 trading days ago (its momentum flipped negative). It made a new 20-day high about 5 trading days ago. It is 15.7% below its highest point of the past year.
Trend
7
| Distance from the 200-day | it is trading 12.9% above its 200-day average, the long-term trend line — a longer-term uptrend | +12.9% |
|---|---|---|
| 50-day moving average | its average price over the last 50 trading days — a short-term trend line — is $332.87 | $332.87 |
| 200-day moving average | its average price over the last 200 trading days — the long-term trend line — is $280.09 | $280.09 |
| Swing structure | its recent peaks and dips disagree — one of them is rising while the other is not, so there is no clean up or down pattern in the swings | mixed — one of the two is not confirming |
| Last swing turn | its last significant turn was a swing low 23 calendar days ago — the swings before that are what the structure reading is measured on | 23 sessions |
| Since the 50/200 cross | its 50-day average crossed above its 200-day average about 280 trading days ago — a "golden cross", a bullish long-term signal | 280 sessions |
| Trend strength (14-day ADX) | there is no clear trend right now — the price is choppy (ADX, a 0–100 trend-strength gauge, is 16, below the 25 that marks a real trend), though sellers have been pushing harder than buyers lately — pressure, not a trend | 15.6 |
Momentum
3
| 14-day RSI | momentum is neutral — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 42, neither overbought (above 70) nor oversold (below 30) | 41.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Position in its 14-day range | it is trading near the bottom of its 14-day range ($310.27 to $366.41) — its "stochastic" reading is 10 out of 100, where 0 would mean closing exactly at the 14-session low and 100 exactly at the high. This measures WHERE the price sits inside its recent range, which is a different question from the RSI beside it: RSI is a momentum gauge, measuring how FAST the price has been moving, so a stock can drift quietly to the bottom of its range with an ordinary RSI, or fall sharply and still sit in the middle. It has been slipping within that range over the last few sessions. | 10.4 |
| Since the MACD crossed zero | MACD, a trend-momentum gauge, turned bearish about 2 trading days ago (its momentum flipped negative) | 2 sessions |
Range
12
| 52-week high | its highest closing price over the past year (about 252 trading days) was $374.96 | $374.96 |
|---|---|---|
| From the 52-week high | it is 15.7% below its 52-week high (its highest price of the past year) | -15.7% |
| Above the 52-week low | it is 106.8% above its 52-week low (its lowest price of the past year) | +106.8% |
| Below the 52-week high | it is 15.7% below its highest point of the past year | 15.7% |
| Since a 20-day breakout | it made a new 20-day high about 5 trading days ago | 5 sessions |
| Since a 55-day breakout | it made a new 55-day low about 18 trading days ago | 18 sessions |
| All-time high | its highest closing price on record is $374.96 (set on 2026-06-22) | $374.96 |
| Given back of the 52-week move | over the past year its closes ranged ($158.51 to $373.34), and it has given back roughly a quarter of its rise from last year’s low — 27% of it. Chart-watchers call 61.8%-65% given back the "golden pocket" — for this company that is $233.70 to $240.58. It is watched widely enough that orders cluster there, which is the honest reason it matters; it is not a forecast. | 26.6% |
| From the all-time high | it is 15.7% below its all-time high | -15.7% |
| Nearest price level | it is trading 3.0% below a resistance level at $325.62 — a price it turned at three times since 2026-04-28, most recently on 2026-06-01. Since 2024-08-21 it has 11 such levels below the current price and 3 above. Levels like these describe where the price has reversed or paused before; they are not a forecast of where it will go. | +3.0% |
| All-time low | its lowest closing price on record is $21.07 (set on 2016-02-11) | $21.07 |
| Above the all-time low | it is 1400.3% above its all-time low | +1,400% |
Volatility
5
| Band width vs its own 6 months | day-to-day price swings are wider than usual versus its own recent 6-month history (wider than about 73% of it) | 73rd percentile |
|---|---|---|
| Typical daily range | in a typical session it travels about $14.54 between its high and its low — about 4.6% of its price. That is its "average true range" over the last 14 sessions, which also counts the distance from the previous close, so a day that opens well away from yesterday counts as the large move it was | $14.54 |
| Bollinger bands (20-day, ±2σ) | most of its recent trading has stayed between about $295.10 and $367.29 — the "Bollinger bands", a range drawn two standard deviations either side of its 20-day average price, which widens when the stock gets more volatile and narrows when it settles | $295.10 – $331.20 – $367.29 |
| Typical daily range (% of price) | its price moves about 4.6% in a typical session — about typical for the companies we cover. This is the average gap between a session's high and low over the last 14 sessions, counting overnight moves, expressed against the current price so it can be compared with companies trading at any price | 4.6% |
| Stretch from the 200-day average | it is trading 2.5 daily ranges above its 200-day average price (12.9% above it in plain percentage terms) — a way of asking how far it has stretched from its own average in units of how far it normally moves in a day, so a calm company and a jumpy one can be compared on the same scale | 2.5 daily ranges above its 200-day average |
Volume
1
| Volume vs its 30-day average | trading volume is about normal versus its 30-day average | 0.93× |
|---|
Analyst
2
| Change in the average price target | analysts have raised their average price target by 6.9% since the prior reading | +6.9% |
|---|---|---|
| Change in the consensus rating | not available for this company yet | n/a |
Candlestick patterns
1
| Since a bearish engulfing | 9 sessions ago it opened above the previous session's close and finished below that session's open — a "bearish engulfing" pair, where one down day more than undid the up day before it | 9 sessions ago |
|---|
Price gaps
3
| Gap at the open | it opened on 2026-08-21 0.9% above the previous session's close — an overnight gap, the part of the move that happened while the market was shut, and traded back through that level before the close | +0.9% |
|---|---|---|
| Open gap | it gapped 3.1% below the previous close 3 sessions ago and has not traded back through the level it left behind at 361.15 — an "unfilled gap", which describes a price range no trade has since crossed and is not a forecast that it will be crossed | -3.1% |
| Gap filled | a 2.4% gap up opened on 2026-08-19 has been "filled" 2 sessions ago — price traded back through the level the gap left behind, and it closed again during the very session that opened it | 2 sessions ago |
Price streaks
1
| Closing streak | it has closed lower 4 sessions in a row, a -12.47% move over the run — an unbroken run of down days, which describes what has already happened and says nothing about the next session | 4 sessions down |
|---|
Relative strength
4
| vs market, 1 month | over the past 1 month this stock lagged the market by 6.0 percentage points (the stock lost 3.7% while the market gained 2.3%) | -6.0% |
|---|---|---|
| vs market, 3 months | over the past 3 months this stock lagged the market by 9.4 percentage points (the stock lost 6.3% while the market gained 3.1%) | -9.4% |
| vs market, 6 months | over the past 6 months this stock beat the market by 18.7 percentage points (the stock gained 29.8% while the market gained 11.1%) | +18.7% |
| vs market, 12 months | over the past 12 months this stock beat the market by 76.4 percentage points (the stock gained 96.9% while the market gained 20.5%) | +76.4% |
Signal agreement
2
| Bullish technical signals | 4 of the 9 technical signals we can compute for it are currently in a bullish state: a "golden cross" — its 50-day average is above its 200-day, trading above its 200-day average, outperforming the market over 6 months, near the bottom of its 14-day range (oversold) — these describe past price behaviour, not a forecast | 4 of 9 |
|---|---|---|
| Bearish technical signals | 2 of the 9 technical signals we can compute for it are currently in a bearish state: MACD momentum is negative, trading below the Ichimoku cloud — these describe past price behaviour, not a forecast | 2 of 9 |
Trend (Ichimoku cloud)
1
| Vs the Ichimoku cloud | trading 4.1% below the Ichimoku cloud — a band drawn from where its own highs and lows sat up to 2026-07-16 and projected forward over today's price, the side traders read as an established downtrend, with the band above acting as the level that would have to be cleared. The band itself is moderate, spanning 3.4% of the share price. | -4.1% |
|---|
Volume-weighted price
1
| Vs this year’s average price paid | the price is 3% above the average price paid so far this year, so the typical buyer over that stretch is showing a gain. That average is $307.36 — a volume-weighted average of daily closes over 158 sessions, not a true tick-by-tick VWAP. | +2.9% |
|---|
Price levels it has turned at before
KEYS last closed at $316.13 on 2026-08-21. Since 2024-08-21 it has turned at 11 prices below its last close and 3 above; the 3 nearest below and the 3 nearest above are listed, nearest first.
| Level | Side | Distance | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| $325.62 | Resistance | 3.0% above the last close | turned there three times · 2026-04-28 to 2026-06-01 |
| $302.76 | Support | 4.2% below the last close | turned there three times · 2026-03-24 to 2026-07-17 |
| $332.55 | Resistance | 5.2% above the last close | turned there twice · 2026-07-13 to 2026-07-23 |
| $265.69 | Support | 15.9% below the last close | turned there twice · 2026-03-09 to 2026-03-30 |
| $372.57 | Resistance | 17.9% above the last close | turned there twice · 2026-05-11 to 2026-06-22 |
| $214.47 | Support | 32.2% below the last close | turned there three times · 2025-12-11 to 2026-02-05 |
A level is a price this company reversed or paused at more than once — they describe past behaviour, not a forecast of where the price will go.
Wave structure
No Elliott-wave labelling currently fits its swings: the recent highs and lows do not satisfy the three rules a five-wave count has to obey, so there is no count to show rather than a count we are unsure about.
Read from daily closes as of 2026-08-21.
An Elliott-wave count describes the swings already printed and the level that would disprove it. It is not a forecast, a target, or advice.
Screens: Trading above the 200-day moving average · MACD just crossed bearish (12/26/9) · trendless / choppy (low ADX) · Analyst price target recently RAISED · beating the market · At the bottom of its 14-day range (stochastic below 20) | Learn: moving average · golden cross · adx · rsi · macd · breakout · fifty two week high low
Based on daily closing prices as of 2026-08-21. Describes past price behavior only — informational, not financial advice.
Analyst consensus
- Consensus ratingBuy (1.58 mean, 1=Strong Buy…5=Strong Sell) — 12 analysts
- Mean price target$415.08 range $350.00 – $452.00; median $417.50
Analyst estimates, as of 2026-08-22. These are third-party analyst opinions and price targets, aggregated — not a recommendation, prediction, or advice from stocks-llm. Informational only.
Analyst EPS estimate for KEYS
- Consensus EPS estimate$3.38 next reporting period, as of 2026-08-22
Change over time is not available yet: it needs two readings of the same reporting period at least 30 days apart, and we have been recording these estimates since 2026-08-04. An estimate for a DIFFERENT quarter is not a revision, so a reading from before the last report is never compared with one after it.
The consensus estimate for the next reporting period, and how it has moved between readings of that SAME period. A change is measured only between readings estimating one period — when a company reports, the consensus moves to the next quarter and the two numbers are not comparable. Informational only, not a forecast and not advice.
Key risks (from latest filing)
["Integration risks and costs associated with acquired businesses.","Exposure to international trade regulations, tariffs, and global supply chain disruptions.","Sensitivity of operating results to R&D and capital expenditure cycles in the aerospace, defense, and communications end markets."]
What changed in the latest 10-Q
AI-assisted comparison of KEYS's 10-Q filed 2026-06-04 against the prior one filed 2026-03-05.
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
- Added:
- Newer filing (2026-06-04) reports six-month periods ended April 30, 2026 in addition to three-month periods; older filing (2026-03-05) reports only three-month period ended January 31, 2026
- Newer filing adds disclosure of net IEEPA tariff refund claims as driver of gross margin increase
- Newer filing reports gross margin increased 6 percentage points (three months) and 3 percentage points (six months) vs. older filing showing 1 percentage point decrease
- Newer filing reports R&D expense increased 28 percent (three months) and 25 percent (six months) vs. older filing showing 22 percent increase
- Newer filing reports SG&A expense increased 26 percent (three months) and 25 percent (six months) vs. older filing showing 24 percent increase
- Newer filing reports operating margin increased 8 percentage points (three months) and 3 percentage points (six months); older filing shows 1 percentage point decrease
- Newer filing includes comprehensive income tax table with effective tax rates of 16.5 percent and (2.3) percent; older filing shows (42) percent and 15 percent
- Newer filing discloses $97 million net benefit from favorable audit settlement and $12 million statute of limitations release; older filing reports $93 million and $8 million respectively
- Newer filing reports long-term unrecognized tax benefits of $185 million as of April 30, 2026 vs. $172 million as of January 31, 2026 in older filing
- Newer filing shows headcount of approximately 16,500 as of April 30, 2026; older filing shows 16,600 as of January 31, 2026
- Newer filing reports CSG revenue of $1,231 million (three months) and $2,355 million (six months) with 35 percent and 31 percent year-over-year growth; older filing shows $1,124 million with 27 percent growth
- Newer filing adds currency impact of 1 ppt favorable and acquisition impact of 7 ppt to CSG revenue disclosure
- Removed:
- Older filing's detailed narrative explanation of CSG revenue drivers (AI capabilities, 5G, high-speed networks, specific end-market percentages) is not included in the newer filing's truncated CSG section
- Reworded:
- Newer filing describes operating margin gains for six months primarily due to gross margin gains (simplified); older filing attributed operating margin decline to gross margin declines
- Newer filing describes interest income decrease and interest expense increase with different year-over-year comparisons reflecting different reporting periods
- Newer filing uses more detailed language on other income (expense) net, referencing derivative instruments and equity investments with specific amounts; older filing uses simpler explanation
- Newer filing describes SG&A drivers with specific mention of 'higher selling and marketing costs, partially offset by lower acquisition and integration costs'; older filing omits these specifics
- Notes:
- The two filings cover different fiscal periods (January 31, 2026 vs. April 30, 2026) making direct comparisons of operating metrics not entirely parallel
- The newer filing's CSG section is truncated and incomplete in the provided text, limiting full comparison of segment discussion
- Income tax discussion in newer filing includes six-month discrete items ($87 million benefit including $97 million audit settlement and $15 million IEEPA tariff expense); older filing shows only three-month discrete items ($106 million benefit), making comparison of tax drivers partially non-comparable
Risk Factors
- Added:
- In February 2026, the Supreme Court of the United States ('U.S. Supreme Court') determined that tariffs imposed pursuant to the International Emergency Economic Powers Act ('IEEPA') were not authorized by law.
- Subsequent rulings by the U.S. Court of International Trade have directed U.S. Customs and Border Protection to implement processes for the refund of certain tariffs previously collected.
- In light of these developments, we have submitted, or intend to submit, claims seeking refunds of tariffs previously paid.
- However, uncertainty remains regarding the ultimate outcome of these claims, including: the administrative procedures and timing for processing claims, the availability of government funding or appropriations to support refund payments (including accrued interest), and the impacts of any further litigation, appeals or regulatory action.
- As a result, we cannot predict the period in which any such amounts may be recovered. In addition, any anticipated refunds may be delayed, reduced, or denied.
- To the extent we are unable to recover tariffs previously paid, or experience delays or uncertainty in recovery, our results of operations, cash flows and financial condition could be adversely affected.
- Reference to 'the Middle East' added to list of regions affected by political violence and unrest
- Removed:
- Notwithstanding the decision by the United States Supreme Court on February 20, 2026 in Learning Resources, Inc. et al v. Trump , litigation continues in the federal courts regarding the treatment (including recoverability) of certain tariffs.
- Substantial portion of text regarding how tariffs and trade restrictions could adversely affect financial results through reduced demand, cancelled orders, supply chain disruptions, increased transaction costs, and increased expenses.
- Text regarding U.S. relationship with countries subject to increased tariffs resulting in additional trade disputes, trade protection measures, retaliatory actions, increased barriers, policies favoring domestic industries, or increased import/export licensing requirements.
- Reference to deployment of resources in affected jurisdictions being misaligned and operations being adversely affected due to trade measures.
- Entire separate risk factor section: 'Volatile geopolitical turmoil, including popular uprisings, regional conflicts, terrorism, and war could result in market instability, which could negatively impact our business results.'
- Reworded:
- Older filing referenced 'Learning Resources, Inc. et al v. Trump' Supreme Court decision dated February 20, 2026; newer filing generalizes to 'In February 2026, the Supreme Court of the United States determined that tariffs imposed pursuant to the International Emergency Economic Powers Act were not authorized by law' without case name reference.
- Older text stated 'political violence and unrest in the U.S., the U.K., Europe, and Asia'; newer text states 'political violence and unrest in the U.S., the U.K., Europe, the Middle East and Asia' (added 'the Middle East').
- Notes:
- Text comparison limited by truncation of older filing at end of visible section; full extent of removals in subsequent paragraphs cannot be fully assessed.
- The newer filing appears to have reorganized and expanded the tariff discussion with specific focus on IEEPA ruling and refund claims, while removing or consolidating other trade policy language from the older version.
AI-assisted comparison of two SEC filing sections. It describes wording and theme changes only, makes no materiality, legal, or investment judgement, and is not financial advice. Informational only — not financial advice.
Insider activity (SEC Form 4)
0 open-market purchases and 3 open-market sales by insiders in the last 90 days.
- Last 90 days0 buys · 3 sells ($2M) — 3 selling insiders
- Last 180 days0 buys · 7 sells ($4M) — 6 selling insiders
Activity heuristic: net selling (a transparent product heuristic from the counts above, not a prediction or advice)
Most recent open-market transaction: 2026-06-30. As of 2026-08-25.
View full insider trading history → View SEC Form 3/4/5 filingsAsk about KEYS's insider activity →
Only open-market purchases (SEC code P) and sales (code S) are counted here. Option exercises, vesting/awards, gifts, and shares withheld for taxes are excluded — they are compensation or mechanical, not open-market conviction. Sales may be planned and non-discretionary (e.g. a Rule 10b5-1 plan) and are not necessarily bearish; open-market buying is not a recommendation to buy. Informational only — not financial advice.
Congressional trading disclosures
U.S. House members publicly disclose their own, their spouse's, and dependent children's stock transactions under the STOCK Act. We hold 2 matched disclosures for KEYS from U.S. House Clerk Periodic Transaction Report filings.
Congressional trading disclosures →Institutional ownership (13F)
5 institutional 13F filers reported holding KEYS as of 2026-03-31 (quarter-end position, filed within 45 days).
- Distinct 13F filers 5
- Reported shares held 28,948,849
- Reported value $8,174,286,474
reported quarterly holdings change (2025-12-31 → 2026-03-31): 0 new, 3 increased, 2 decreased, 0 exited. Change counts cover only managers that filed 13F reports in BOTH quarters, derived between two quarter-end snapshots — not same-day trades; a single manager is never said to have "bought" or "sold".
Institutional holdings are quarter-end long positions reported on SEC Form 13F-HR, filed up to 45 days after the quarter ends — they are delayed, are not real-time trades, exclude short positions and most non-US securities, and are not investment advice. Any increase/decrease is a reported change between two quarterly snapshots, not a same-day purchase or sale. These are quarter-end snapshots from the 13F filings on SEC EDGAR, filed within 45 days — not real-time, and any change is a difference between two quarterly reports, not a same-day trade. Informational only — not financial advice.
Short interest (FINRA)
KEYS had 3,196,667 shares of reported short interest as of the 2026-07-31 FINRA settlement date (delayed, bi-monthly; not real-time).
KEYS had 1.87% of its shares outstanding sold short as of the 2026-07-31 FINRA settlement date (percent of FLOAT would be higher — float is not disclosed in the source). FINRA reported 2.56 days to cover at the same settlement.
- Reported short interest (shares) 3,196,667
- Short interest (% of shares outstanding) 1.87%
- Prior settlement (shares) 3,132,673
- Reported change 2.04%
- Days to cover (reported) 2.56
Reported to FINRA as of the 2026-07-31 settlement date. Short interest is reported to FINRA and published on a delayed, bi-monthly schedule (as of a settlement date, disseminated roughly eight business days later) — it is NOT real-time, does not cover every venue or all US trading, and is not a short-squeeze prediction or investment advice. Days-to-cover is the value FINRA reports; percent of float is not shown because the source file carries no share-count denominator — where a percent appears it is of shares OUTSTANDING, the larger base, and is therefore a floor on percent of float. Informational only — not financial advice.
Competitors & peers
- Rohde & Schwarz
- National Instruments (Emerson)
- Anritsu
- Viavi Solutions (VIAV)
- Tektronix (Fortive - FTV)
AI-enriched competitor set. Linked names are companies covered by stocks-llm; other named peers are shown for reference only.
Compare KEYS vs…
Keysight Technologies is found in…
Frequently asked questions
What does Keysight Technologies (KEYS) do?
Keysight Technologies provides electronic design, emulation, and test software, instrumentation, and systems for the communications and electronics industries. The company operates through two segments, Communications Solutions Group (CSG) and Electronic Industrial Solutions Group (EISG), serving customers in aerospace, defense, government, wireless, wireline, and data center ecosystems.
What sector is Keysight Technologies (KEYS) in?
Keysight Technologies (KEYS) is classified in the Information Technology sector. Its industry is Electronic Test & Measurement Equipment. It trades on NYSE.
Who are Keysight Technologies's (KEYS) competitors?
Notable peers of Keysight Technologies (KEYS) include Rohde & Schwarz, National Instruments (Emerson), Anritsu, Viavi Solutions and Tektronix (Fortive - FTV). This peer set is informational only — not financial advice.
Has there been recent Congressional stock trading in KEYS?
Yes — we hold 2 matched STOCK Act disclosures for KEYS from U.S. House Clerk Periodic Transaction Report filings. These are legally-required disclosures (often filed 30–45 days after the trade), may belong to a U.S. House member, their spouse, or a dependent child, and are not an indicator of company performance or investment advice.
Is Keysight Technologies (KEYS) overbought or oversold right now?
Keysight Technologies (KEYS) is currently neither overbought nor oversold — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 42, in the neutral middle (as of 2026-08-21). RSI describes recent price momentum, not a forecast — informational only, not financial advice.
Where does stocks-llm's data on KEYS come from?
Fundamentals and prices come from market data, as of 2026-08-24; company filings and profile facts come from SEC EDGAR. All figures are delayed daily-close data shown with their as-of date — informational only, not financial advice.
Fundamentals: market data, as of 2026-08-24. Filings: SEC EDGAR. Prices are delayed daily-close data.
Last updated 2026-08-21.
Informational only — NOT financial advice. All figures are delayed daily-close data from SEC EDGAR & market data, shown with their as-of date.