INTUITIVE MACHINES INC CLASS A (LUNR)
Industrials · Aerospace & Defense · NASDAQ
Intuitive Machines is a space technology firm dedicated to lunar exploration through its autonomous lunar lander services and satellite operations.
What INTUITIVE MACHINES INC CLASS A does
Intuitive Machines is a space exploration and infrastructure company that designs and builds lunar landers and space-related systems. The company focuses on providing mission services to the Moon and developing satellite and space operations technologies. It primarily serves government agencies and commercial customers in the space industry.
Themes: space exploration, lunar infrastructure, satellite operations, space flight services, government contracting
Fundamentals
- Price$13.70 as of 2026-10-08 close
- Market cap$3.1B as of 2026-08-06 (share count; price 2026-10-08)
- 1-year return+9.8% 2025-10-08 close $12.48 → 2026-10-08 close $13.70
- P/En/a negative earnings
- Net margin-40.2% FY2025, SEC XBRL
- Revenue growth (YoY)-9.2% FY2025 vs FY2024, SEC XBRL
- Revenue CAGR (3y)+34.1% SEC XBRL
- Beta2.83 as of 2026-09-03
- Last reported earnings2026-08-13 SEC EDGAR Form 8-K (Item 2.02)
How LUNR compares in its sector
- net profit marginbottom 10% 417 covered Industrials peers, as of 2026-09-03
- operating marginbottom 10% 392 covered Industrials peers, as of 2026-09-03
- 3-year revenue CAGRtop 10% 428 covered Industrials peers
- free cash flow (absolute dollars, latest fiscal year)bottom 25% 417 covered Industrials peers, as of FY2025
Position among covered Industrials companies that report each metric (minimum 5 peers). A relative position within our covered catalog — not a valuation, quality, or investment judgment. A higher percentile is simply a higher value (for P/E, more expensive on earnings — never "better"). Informational only.
Dividend coverage
Not assessed — last reported dividend predates the accounts. The most recent fiscal year in which LUNR reported a dividend payment is FY2023, while its reported financial statements run through FY2025. Coverage is therefore not assessed for the latest year — an FY2023 ratio would not describe LUNR today.
Coverage is derived from reported SEC EDGAR XBRL figures, comparing dividends paid against net income and free cash flow for the SAME fiscal year. It is not shown here because the latest fiscal year with a reported dividend payment (FY2023) is older than the latest year of reported financial statements (FY2025), so any ratio would describe an out-of-date year. Informational only — not financial advice.
How INTUITIVE MACHINES INC CLASS A looks technically
INTUITIVE MACHINES INC CLASS A (LUNR) is trading 31.1% below its 200-day average, the long-term trend line — a long-term downtrend. Its 50-day average crossed below its 200-day average about 38 trading days ago — a "death cross", a bearish long-term signal. There is no clear trend right now — the price is choppy (ADX, a 0–100 trend-strength gauge, is 13, below the 25 that marks a real trend). Momentum is neutral — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 42, neither overbought (above 70) nor oversold (below 30). MACD, a trend-momentum gauge, turned bearish about 1 trading day ago (its momentum flipped negative). It just made a new 20-day low, its first since 2026-08-03, breaking below its recent trading range. It is 70.7% below its highest point of the past year. Day-to-day price swings are unusually narrow versus its own recent history — a "Bollinger squeeze" (in the tightest 8% of the past ~6 months), which often precedes a bigger move.
Trend
8
| Distance from the 200-day | it is trading 31.1% below its 200-day average, the long-term trend line — a long-term downtrend | -31.1% |
|---|---|---|
| 50-day moving average | its average price over the last 50 trading days — a short-term trend line — is $15.42 | $15.42 |
| 200-day moving average | its average price over the last 200 trading days — the long-term trend line — is $19.89 | $19.89 |
| Swing structure | its recent peaks and dips disagree — one of them is rising while the other is not, so there is no clean up or down pattern in the swings | mixed — one of the two is not confirming |
| Last swing turn | its last significant turn was a swing high 16 calendar days ago — the swings before that are what the structure reading is measured on | 16 sessions |
| Wave structure | its recent swings can be read as a completed three-part upward correction — a pullback in the A-B-C shape Elliott-wave chartists use; the labelling fails if price closes above 16.26. It is the only labelling that fits, though not with textbook proportions, and it describes the swings already printed, not what comes next. | possible three-wave upward correction, complete (atypical proportions) |
| Since the 50/200 cross | its 50-day average crossed below its 200-day average about 38 trading days ago — a "death cross", a bearish long-term signal | 38 sessions |
| Trend strength (14-day ADX) | there is no clear trend right now — the price is choppy (ADX, a 0–100 trend-strength gauge, is 13, below the 25 that marks a real trend) | 13.0 |
Momentum
3
| 14-day RSI | momentum is neutral — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 42, neither overbought (above 70) nor oversold (below 30) | 41.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Position in its 14-day range | it is trading near the bottom of its 14-day range ($13.40 to $16.26) — its "stochastic" reading is 10 out of 100, where 0 would mean closing exactly at the 14-session low and 100 exactly at the high. This measures WHERE the price sits inside its recent range, which is a different question from the RSI beside it: RSI is a momentum gauge, measuring how FAST the price has been moving, so a stock can drift quietly to the bottom of its range with an ordinary RSI, or fall sharply and still sit in the middle. It has been slipping within that range over the last few sessions. | 10.5 |
| Since the MACD crossed zero | MACD, a trend-momentum gauge, turned bearish about 1 trading day ago (its momentum flipped negative) | 1 session |
Range
12
| 52-week high | its highest closing price over the past year (about 252 trading days) was $46.75 | $46.75 |
|---|---|---|
| From the 52-week high | it is 70.7% below its 52-week high (its highest price of the past year) | -70.7% |
| Above the 52-week low | it is 76.1% above its 52-week low (its lowest price of the past year) | +76.1% |
| Below the 52-week high | it is 70.7% below its highest point of the past year | 70.7% |
| Since a 20-day breakout | it just made a new 20-day low, its first since 2026-08-03, breaking below its recent trading range | 1 session |
| Since a 55-day breakout | it made a new 55-day low about 51 trading days ago | 51 sessions |
| All-time high | its highest closing price on record is $136.00 (set on 2023-02-22) | $136.00 |
| Given back of the 52-week move | over the past year its closes ranged ($8.05 to $45.70), and it has given back almost all of its rise from last year’s low — 85% of it. Chart-watchers call 61.8%-65% given back the "golden pocket" — for this company that is $21.23 to $22.43. It is watched widely enough that orders cluster there, which is the honest reason it matters; it is not a forecast. | 85.0% |
| From the all-time high | it is 89.9% below its all-time high | -89.9% |
| Nearest price level | it is trading 6.9% above a support level at $12.75 — a price it turned at twice since 2025-05-13, most recently on 2026-07-17. Since 2024-10-08 it has 6 such levels below the current price and 5 above. Levels like these describe where the price has reversed or paused before; they are not a forecast of where it will go. | -6.9% |
| All-time low | its lowest closing price on record is $2.09 (set on 2024-01-04) | $2.09 |
| Above the all-time low | it is 555.7% above its all-time low | +555.7% |
Volatility
5
| Band width vs its own 6 months | day-to-day price swings are unusually narrow versus its own recent history — a "Bollinger squeeze" (in the tightest 8% of the past ~6 months), which often precedes a bigger move | 8th percentile |
|---|---|---|
| Typical daily range | in a typical session it travels about $1.03 between its high and its low — about 7.5% of its price. That is its "average true range" over the last 14 sessions, which also counts the distance from the previous close, so a day that opens well away from yesterday counts as the large move it was | $1.03 |
| Bollinger bands (20-day, ±2σ) | most of its recent trading has stayed between about $13.21 and $16.13 — the "Bollinger bands", a range drawn two standard deviations either side of its 20-day average price, which widens when the stock gets more volatile and narrows when it settles | $13.21 – $14.67 – $16.13 |
| Typical daily range (% of price) | its price moves about 7.5% in a typical session — more volatile than most companies we cover. This is the average gap between a session's high and low over the last 14 sessions, counting overnight moves, expressed against the current price so it can be compared with companies trading at any price | 7.5% |
| Stretch from the 200-day average | it is trading 6.0 daily ranges below its 200-day average price (31.1% below it in plain percentage terms) — a way of asking how far it has stretched from its own average in units of how far it normally moves in a day, so a calm company and a jumpy one can be compared on the same scale | 6.0 daily ranges below its 200-day average |
Volume
1
| Volume vs its 30-day average | trading volume is about normal versus its 30-day average | 1.26× |
|---|
Analyst
2
| Change in the average price target | analysts' average price target is unchanged from the prior reading | 0.0% |
|---|---|---|
| Change in the consensus rating | not available for this company yet | n/a |
Price gaps
3
| Gap at the open | it opened on 2026-10-08 1.4% below the previous session's close — an overnight gap, the part of the move that happened while the market was shut, and had not traded back through that level by the close | -1.4% |
|---|---|---|
| Open gap | it gapped 3.6% below the previous close 32 sessions ago and has not traded back through the level it left behind at 18.32 — an "unfilled gap", which describes a price range no trade has since crossed and is not a forecast that it will be crossed | -3.6% |
| Gap filled | a 2.1% gap up opened on 2026-10-06 has been "filled" 1 session ago — price traded back through the level the gap left behind, and it took 1 session to close | 1 session ago |
Price streaks
1
| Closing streak | it has closed lower 2 sessions in a row, a -9.03% move over the run — an unbroken run of down days, which describes what has already happened and says nothing about the next session | 2 sessions down |
|---|
Relative strength
4
| vs market, 1 month | over the past 1 month this stock lagged the market by 13.7 percentage points (the stock lost 12.6% while the market gained 1.0%) | -13.7% |
|---|---|---|
| vs market, 3 months | over the past 3 months this stock lagged the market by 23.3 percentage points (the stock lost 19.5% while the market gained 3.8%) | -23.3% |
| vs market, 6 months | over the past 6 months this stock lagged the market by 57.7 percentage points (the stock lost 40.2% while the market gained 17.5%) | -57.7% |
| vs market, 12 months | over the past 12 months this stock lagged the market by 5.2 percentage points (the stock gained 9.8% while the market gained 15.0%) | -5.2% |
Signal agreement
2
| Bullish technical signals | 1 of the 9 technical signals we can compute for it is currently in a bullish state: near the bottom of its 14-day range (oversold) — these describe past price behaviour, not a forecast | 1 of 9 |
|---|---|---|
| Bearish technical signals | 6 of the 9 technical signals we can compute for it are currently in a bearish state: a "death cross" — its 50-day average is below its 200-day, trading below its 200-day average, a fresh 20-day low, MACD momentum is negative, lagging the market over 6 months, trading below the Ichimoku cloud — these describe past price behaviour, not a forecast | 6 of 9 |
Trend (Ichimoku cloud)
1
| Vs the Ichimoku cloud | trading 17% below the Ichimoku cloud — a band drawn from where its own highs and lows sat up to 2026-09-01 and projected forward over today's price, the side traders read as an established downtrend, with the band above acting as the level that would have to be cleared. The band itself is moderate, spanning 4.9% of the share price. | -16.6% |
|---|
Volume-weighted price
2
| Vs this year’s average price paid | the price is 37% below the average price paid so far this year, so the typical buyer over that stretch is under water. That average is $21.90 — a volume-weighted average of daily closes over 188 sessions, not a true tick-by-tick VWAP. | -37.5% |
|---|---|---|
| Vs the average paid since it last reported | the price is 14% below the average price paid since it last reported on 2026-08-13 (its 10-Q), so the typical buyer over that stretch is under water. That average is $16.02 — a volume-weighted average of daily closes over 40 sessions, not a true tick-by-tick VWAP. | -14.5% |
Price levels it has turned at before
LUNR last closed at $13.70 on 2026-10-08. Since 2024-10-08 it has turned at 6 prices below its last close and 5 above; the 3 nearest below and the 3 nearest above are listed, nearest first.
| Level | Side | Distance | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| $12.75 | Support | 6.9% below the last close | turned there twice · 2025-05-13 to 2026-07-17 |
| $15.91 | Resistance | 16.2% above the last close | turned there three times · 2025-01-13 to 2026-09-09 |
| $11.28 | Support | 17.7% below the last close | turned there four times · 2024-12-04 to 2026-07-29 |
| $16.30 | Resistance | 19.0% above the last close | turned there twice · 2026-03-19 to 2026-09-22 |
| $10.76 | Support | 21.5% below the last close | turned there four times · 2025-05-22 to 2025-10-22 |
| $17.15 | Resistance | 25.2% above the last close | turned there twice · 2024-11-29 to 2026-01-13 |
A level is a price this company reversed or paused at more than once — they describe past behaviour, not a forecast of where the price will go.
Wave structure
Its recent swings can be read as a three-part upward correction — the A-B-C shape chartists use for a pullback — now complete.
This labelling fails — stops being a possible reading at all — if it closes above $16.26.
It is the only labelling that fits these swings, though its proportions are not the textbook ones. It was chosen from 3 labellings that survived the rules, counting shorter readings of the same bars.
This reading has stood for 12 trading days, since 2026-09-23.
Read from daily closes as of 2026-10-08.
An Elliott-wave count describes the swings already printed and the level that would disprove it. It is not a forecast, a target, or advice.
Screens: Trading below the 200-day moving average · Pulled back from the 12-month high · Broke down to a new 20-day low · MACD just crossed bearish (12/26/9) · in a Bollinger Band volatility squeeze · trendless / choppy (low ADX) | Learn: moving average · golden cross · adx · rsi · macd · breakout · fifty two week high low · bollinger bands
Based on daily closing prices as of 2026-10-08. Describes past price behavior only — informational, not financial advice.
Analyst consensus
- Mean price target$29.50 range $13.00 – $43.00; median $29.00
Analyst estimates, as of 2026-10-03. These are third-party analyst opinions and price targets, aggregated — not a recommendation, prediction, or advice from stocks-llm. Informational only.
Analyst EPS estimate for LUNR
- Consensus EPS estimate-$0.1075 next reporting period, as of 2026-10-03
- Estimate change, 30 days$0.00 from -$0.1075, on 2026-08-29, 35-day window
- Readings revised upward0% of 6 comparable readings
The consensus estimate for the next reporting period, and how it has moved between readings of that SAME period. A change is measured only between readings estimating one period — when a company reports, the consensus moves to the next quarter and the two numbers are not comparable. Informational only, not a forecast and not advice.
Key risks (from latest filing)
["Significant reliance on U.S. government funding and contracts, susceptible to political and budgetary uncertainty.","Operational risks inherent in spaceflight, including potential for launch failures, mission milestones not met, and hardware loss.","Customer and supply chain concentration, including reliance on a single launch service provider."]
What changed in the latest 10-Q
AI-assisted comparison of LUNR's 10-Q filed 2026-05-15 against the prior one filed 2025-11-13.
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
- Added:
- Newer filing (2026-05-15) references audited consolidated financial statements for years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, filed March 19, 2026
- Newer filing adds 'Recent Developments' section describing Lanteris Space Systems acquisition completed January 13, 2026
- Newer filing adds description of Stifel Loan Agreement waiver dated January 12, 2026
- Newer filing adds Securities Purchase Agreement description from February 27, 2026 involving 11,574,069 shares at $15.12 per share for $175.0 million
- Newer filing describes company as 'space infrastructure and services company' with focus on 'sustained infrastructure and human activity beyond Earth'
- Newer filing reorganizes operating model around three integrated capabilities: Build, Connect, Operate (versus older filing's three core pillars)
- Newer filing adds discussion of 2025 U.S. trade policy shifts, tariffs, and supply chain exposure
- Newer filing references political and regulatory environment changes from current administration policy shifts
- Removed:
- Older filing (2025-11-13) references audited consolidated financial statements for years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, filed March 25, 2025 (replaced with 2025/2024 references in newer filing)
- Older filing's focus on 'cislunar infrastructure and cislunar and deep space commerce' language is replaced in newer filing
- Older filing's description of three core pillars as 'delivery services, data transmission services, and infrastructure as a service' is replaced with Build, Connect, Operate framework
- Older filing's detailed discussion of IM-1 and IM-2 lunar missions and CLPS awards is removed from newer filing's overview section
- Older filing's references to lunar south pole landing achievements and specific mission details are not included in newer filing
- Reworded:
- Company description changed from 'space technology, infrastructure, and services company' to 'space infrastructure and services company'
- Mission focus reframed from cislunar economy development to 'long-duration operations and persistent presence' across LEO, GEO, cislunar and deep space
- Operating model restructured from three pillars (Delivery/Data/Infrastructure) to three integrated capabilities (Build/Connect/Operate)
- Strategy emphasis shifted from cislunar infrastructure to 'combining spacecraft delivery with network connectivity and long-term operations'
- Risk discussion expanded to include current geopolitical tensions, U.S. trade policy changes, and administration policy shifts (not present in older filing)
- Notes:
- Older filing text appears truncated at end of 'Our Business Model' section
- Both filings show truncated/incomplete text at their conclusions
- Comparison is limited to available text; full sections may contain additional differences
AI-assisted comparison of two SEC filing sections. It describes wording and theme changes only, makes no materiality, legal, or investment judgement, and is not financial advice. Informational only — not financial advice.
Insider activity (SEC Form 4)
0 open-market purchases and 14 open-market sales by insiders in the last 90 days, of which we have read Form 4 filings through 2026-10-04. The 5 days since 2026-10-04 have not been checked yet.
- Last 30 days · read to 2026-10-040 buys · 3 sells ($2M) — 1 selling insider
- Last 90 days · read to 2026-10-040 buys · 14 sells ($160M) — 4 selling insiders
- Last 180 days · read to 2026-10-040 buys · 43 sells ($190M) — 8 selling insiders
Activity heuristic: net selling (a transparent product heuristic from the counts above, not a prediction or advice)
Most recent open-market transaction: 2026-09-21. Based on Form 4 filings read through 2026-10-04; anything filed since is not yet included.
View full insider trading history → View SEC Form 3/4/5 filingsAsk about LUNR's insider activity →
Only open-market purchases (SEC code P) and sales (code S) are counted here. Option exercises, vesting/awards, gifts, and shares withheld for taxes are excluded — they are compensation or mechanical, not open-market conviction. Sales may be planned and non-discretionary (e.g. a Rule 10b5-1 plan) and are not necessarily bearish; open-market buying is not a recommendation to buy. Informational only — not financial advice.
Institutional ownership (13F)
6 institutional 13F filers reported holding LUNR as of 2026-06-30 (quarter-end position, filed within 45 days).
- Distinct 13F filers 6
- Reported shares held 35,871,864
- Reported value $767,299,179
reported quarterly holdings change (2026-03-31 → 2026-06-30): 0 new, 6 increased, 0 decreased, 0 exited. Change counts cover only managers that filed 13F reports in BOTH quarters, derived between two quarter-end snapshots — not same-day trades; a single manager is never said to have "bought" or "sold".
Institutional holdings are quarter-end long positions reported on SEC Form 13F-HR, filed up to 45 days after the quarter ends — they are delayed, are not real-time trades, exclude short positions and most non-US securities, and are not investment advice. Any increase/decrease is a reported change between two quarterly snapshots, not a same-day purchase or sale. These are quarter-end snapshots from the 13F filings on SEC EDGAR, filed within 45 days — not real-time, and any change is a difference between two quarterly reports, not a same-day trade. Informational only — not financial advice.
Ask about LUNR's institutional holders → See what each manager we track holds →
Short interest (FINRA)
LUNR had 36,325,445 shares of reported short interest as of the 2026-09-15 FINRA settlement date (delayed, bi-monthly; not real-time).
Short interest as a percent of shares outstanding is not shown for LUNR because we do not hold a verified share count to divide it by. The reported figures above are unaffected.
- Reported short interest (shares) 36,325,445
- Prior settlement (shares) 35,522,092
- Reported change 2.26%
- Days to cover (reported) 6.25
Reported to FINRA as of the 2026-09-15 settlement date. Short interest is reported to FINRA and published on a delayed, bi-monthly schedule (as of a settlement date, disseminated roughly eight business days later) — it is NOT real-time, does not cover every venue or all US trading, and is not a short-squeeze prediction or investment advice. Days-to-cover is the value FINRA reports; percent of float is not shown because the source file carries no share-count denominator — where a percent appears it is of shares OUTSTANDING, the larger base, and is therefore a floor on percent of float. Informational only — not financial advice.
Competitors & peers
AI-enriched competitor set. Linked names are companies covered by stocks-llm; other named peers are shown for reference only.
Compare LUNR vs…
INTUITIVE MACHINES INC CLASS A is found in…
Frequently asked questions
What does INTUITIVE MACHINES INC CLASS A (LUNR) do?
Intuitive Machines is a space exploration and infrastructure company that designs and builds lunar landers and space-related systems. The company focuses on providing mission services to the Moon and developing satellite and space operations technologies. It primarily serves government agencies and commercial customers in the space industry.
What sector is INTUITIVE MACHINES INC CLASS A (LUNR) in?
INTUITIVE MACHINES INC CLASS A (LUNR) is classified in the Industrials sector. Its industry is Aerospace & Defense. It trades on NASDAQ.
Who are INTUITIVE MACHINES INC CLASS A's (LUNR) competitors?
Notable peers of INTUITIVE MACHINES INC CLASS A (LUNR) include SpaceX, Blue Origin, Rocket Lab, Northrop Grumman and Lockheed Martin. This peer set is informational only — not financial advice.
Is INTUITIVE MACHINES INC CLASS A (LUNR) overbought or oversold right now?
INTUITIVE MACHINES INC CLASS A (LUNR) is currently neither overbought nor oversold — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 42, in the neutral middle (as of 2026-10-08). RSI describes recent price momentum, not a forecast — informational only, not financial advice.
Where does stocks-llm's data on LUNR come from?
Fundamentals come from SEC XBRL company filings for the figures marked with a fiscal year, and market data, as of 2026-09-03 for the rest; prices are market data, as of 2026-09-03; company filings and profile facts come from SEC EDGAR. All figures are delayed daily-close data shown with their as-of date — informational only, not financial advice.
Fundamentals: SEC XBRL company filings for the figures marked with a fiscal year, and market data, as of 2026-09-03 for the rest. Filings: SEC EDGAR. Prices are delayed daily-close data.
Last updated 2026-10-08.
Informational only — NOT financial advice. All figures are delayed daily-close data from SEC EDGAR & market data, shown with their as-of date.