Skip to content

Mattel (MAT)

Consumer Discretionary · Toys & Games · NASDAQ

An iconic global toy and entertainment company home to legendary brands like Barbie, Hot Wheels, and Fisher-Price.

What Mattel does

Mattel is a leading global toy company that designs, manufactures, and markets a broad portfolio of brands. Its business centers on iconic consumer products including dolls, vehicles, action figures, and construction sets, as well as infant and preschool toys. The company also leverages its intellectual property through entertainment content, digital games, and licensing partnerships.

Themes: toys and games, entertainment and media licensing, digital gaming

Fundamentals

  • Price$14.51 as of 2026-08-21 close
  • Market cap$4.1B as of 2026-08-21
  • 1-year return-18.3% 2025-08-21 close $17.77 → 2026-08-21 close $14.51
  • P/E9.77 as of 2026-08-24
  • Net margin+7.8% as of 2026-08-24
  • Gross margin+47.6% as of 2026-08-24
  • ROE+19.9% as of 2026-08-24
  • Debt / equity1.17 as of 2026-08-24
  • Revenue growth (YoY)+2.9% as of 2026-08-24
  • Revenue CAGR (3y)-0.5% SEC XBRL
  • Beta0.70 as of 2026-08-24
  • Last reported earnings2026-08-04 SEC EDGAR Form 8-K (Item 2.02)

Ask why MAT looks like this →

How MAT compares in its sector

  • price-to-earnings ratiobottom 10% 266 covered Consumer Discretionary peers, as of 2026-08-24
  • net profit marginmiddle range 334 covered Consumer Discretionary peers, as of 2026-08-24
  • operating marginmiddle range 334 covered Consumer Discretionary peers, as of 2026-08-24
  • gross marginmiddle range 331 covered Consumer Discretionary peers, as of 2026-08-24
  • return on equitymiddle range 334 covered Consumer Discretionary peers, as of 2026-08-24
  • 3-year revenue CAGRmiddle range 325 covered Consumer Discretionary peers

Position among covered Consumer Discretionary companies that report each metric (minimum 5 peers). A relative position within our covered catalog — not a valuation, quality, or investment judgment. A higher percentile is simply a higher value (for P/E, more expensive on earnings — never "better"). Informational only.

Ask how MAT stacks up against peers →

Top 10 scores & list membership

MAT is not currently in any published Top 10 list. Its scores are below.

Long-term score

34.2 #914 of 987 scored · #100 of 115 in Consumer Discretionary

  • Profitability44.5
  • Growth24.2
  • Financial health31.8
  • Valuation70.4
  • Capital return2.3
  • Long-term trend24.5

Valuation 70th (price to earnings 9.8, price to book 2.8) and profitability 45th (return on equity 19.9%, operating margin 7.8%); weakest is capital return (2nd, consecutive years of dividend increases 0 years).

Short-term score

51.1 #708 of 1,704 scored · #79 of 186 in Consumer Discretionary

  • Trend53.5
  • Momentum45.4
  • Setup83.2
  • Volume and participation13.9
  • Catalysts49.4

Setup 83rd: no fresh 20-day breakout up or down; trend 54th: a strong uptrend, with buyers in control; weakest is volume and participation 14th: trading volume is about normal versus its 30-day average.

Scores as of 21 Aug 2026. Each bar is a percentile: how this company ranked against every company the score ranked, 0–100. A list is a published formula and its output, not a recommendation. Method version 2.

Dividend coverage

Not assessed — last reported dividend predates the accounts. The most recent fiscal year in which MAT reported a dividend payment is FY2017, while its reported financial statements run through FY2025. Coverage is therefore not assessed for the latest year — an FY2017 ratio would not describe MAT today.

Coverage is derived from reported SEC EDGAR XBRL figures, comparing dividends paid against net income and free cash flow for the SAME fiscal year. It is not shown here because the latest fiscal year with a reported dividend payment (FY2017) is older than the latest year of reported financial statements (FY2025), so any ratio would describe an out-of-date year. Informational only — not financial advice.

Ask whether MAT's dividend is covered →

How Mattel looks technically

Mattel (MAT) is trading 13.6% below its 200-day average, the long-term trend line — a long-term downtrend. Its 50-day average crossed below its 200-day average about 106 trading days ago — a "death cross", a bearish long-term signal. A strong uptrend is in place — ADX, a 0–100 trend-strength gauge, is 26, with buyers in control. Momentum is neutral — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 48, neither overbought (above 70) nor oversold (below 30). It made a new 20-day high about 19 trading days ago. It is 35.5% below its highest point of the past year.

Trend

8
Distance from the 200-dayit is trading 13.6% below its 200-day average, the long-term trend line — a long-term downtrend-13.6%
50-day moving averageits average price over the last 50 trading days — a short-term trend line — is $14.27$14.27
200-day moving averageits average price over the last 200 trading days — the long-term trend line — is $16.80$16.80
Swing structureeach recent peak has been higher than the one before it and each dip has been shallower — the pattern chart-watchers call an uptrend, which describes where price has already been and not where it goes nexthigher highs and higher lows
Last swing turnits last significant turn was a swing low 15 calendar days ago — the swings before that are what the structure reading is measured on15 sessions
Wave structureits recent swings can be read as a five-part upward sequence — what Elliott-wave chartists call an impulse — now in leg 3 of five; the labelling fails if price closes below 14.19. It is one of several labellings that fit, and it describes the swings already printed, not what comes next. The same swings also read as a three-part correction in leg C.possible upward five-wave sequence, in wave 3 (one of several readings)
Since the 50/200 crossits 50-day average crossed below its 200-day average about 106 trading days ago — a "death cross", a bearish long-term signal106 sessions
Trend strength (14-day ADX)a strong uptrend is in place — ADX, a 0–100 trend-strength gauge, is 26, with buyers in control26.4

Momentum

3
14-day RSImomentum is neutral — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 48, neither overbought (above 70) nor oversold (below 30)48.4
Position in its 14-day rangeit is trading in the lower half of its 14-day range ($14.19 to $15.65) — its "stochastic" reading is 22 out of 100, where 0 would mean closing exactly at the 14-session low and 100 exactly at the high. This measures WHERE the price sits inside its recent range, which is a different question from the RSI beside it: RSI is a momentum gauge, measuring how FAST the price has been moving, so a stock can drift quietly to the bottom of its range with an ordinary RSI, or fall sharply and still sit in the middle. It has been slipping within that range over the last few sessions.21.9
Since the MACD crossed zeroMACD, a trend-momentum gauge, is in negative territory (momentum leaning bearish)12 sessions

Range

12
52-week highits highest closing price over the past year (about 252 trading days) was $22.48$22.48
From the 52-week highit is 35.5% below its 52-week high (its highest price of the past year)-35.5%
Above the 52-week lowit is 14.0% above its 52-week low (its lowest price of the past year)+14.0%
Below the 52-week highit is 35.5% below its highest point of the past year35.5%
Since a 20-day breakoutit made a new 20-day high about 19 trading days ago19 sessions
Since a 55-day breakoutit made a new 55-day high about 19 trading days ago19 sessions
All-time highits highest closing price on record is $48.48 (set on 2013-05-14)$48.48
Given back of the 52-week moveover the past year its closes ranged ($13.05 to $22.16), and it has recovered roughly a quarter of its fall from last year’s high — 16% of it. Chart-watchers call 61.8%-65% given back the "golden pocket" — for this company that is $18.68 to $18.97. It is watched widely enough that orders cluster there, which is the honest reason it matters; it is not a forecast.16.0%
From the all-time highit is 70.1% below its all-time high-70.1%
Nearest price levelit is trading 2.2% below a resistance level at $14.82 — a price it turned at three times since 2026-02-12, most recently on 2026-07-16. Since 2024-08-21 it has 1 such level below the current price and 12 above. Levels like these describe where the price has reversed or paused before; they are not a forecast of where it will go.+2.2%
All-time lowits lowest closing price on record is $6.53 (set on 2020-03-23)$6.53
Above the all-time lowit is 122.2% above its all-time low+122.2%

Volatility

5
Band width vs its own 6 monthsday-to-day price swings are narrower than usual versus its own recent 6-month history (tighter than about 71% of it)29th percentile
Typical daily rangein a typical session it travels about $0.4525 between its high and its low — about 3.1% of its price. That is its "average true range" over the last 14 sessions, which also counts the distance from the previous close, so a day that opens well away from yesterday counts as the large move it was$0.4525
Bollinger bands (20-day, ±2σ)most of its recent trading has stayed between about $14.26 and $15.40 — the "Bollinger bands", a range drawn two standard deviations either side of its 20-day average price, which widens when the stock gets more volatile and narrows when it settles$14.26 – $14.83 – $15.40
Typical daily range (% of price)its price moves about 3.1% in a typical session — about typical for the companies we cover. This is the average gap between a session's high and low over the last 14 sessions, counting overnight moves, expressed against the current price so it can be compared with companies trading at any price3.1%
Stretch from the 200-day averageit is trading 5.1 daily ranges below its 200-day average price (13.6% below it in plain percentage terms) — a way of asking how far it has stretched from its own average in units of how far it normally moves in a day, so a calm company and a jumpy one can be compared on the same scale5.1 daily ranges below its 200-day average

Volume

1
Volume vs its 30-day averagetrading volume is about normal versus its 30-day average0.99×

Analyst

2
Change in the average price targetanalysts have cut their average price target by 0.1% since the prior reading-0.1%
Change in the consensus ratingthe analyst consensus rating is unchanged since the prior readingunchanged

Candlestick patterns

1
Since a bullish engulfing1 session ago it opened below the previous session's close and finished above that session's open — a "bullish engulfing" pair, where one up day more than undid the down day before it1 session ago

Price gaps

2
Gap at the openit opened on 2026-08-21 0.5% above the previous session's close — an overnight gap, the part of the move that happened while the market was shut, and traded back through that level before the close+0.5%
Gap filleda 4.4% gap up opened on 2026-08-05 has been "filled" 12 sessions ago — price traded back through the level the gap left behind, and it closed again during the very session that opened it12 sessions ago

Price streaks

1
Closing streakit closed lower in its latest session, after a session that did not close lower — a single down day rather than a run1 session down

Relative strength

4
vs market, 1 monthover the past 1 month this stock lagged the market by 0.1 percentage points (the stock gained 2.2% while the market gained 2.3%)-0.1%
vs market, 3 monthsover the past 3 months this stock lagged the market by 6.2 percentage points (the stock lost 3.1% while the market gained 3.1%)-6.2%
vs market, 6 monthsover the past 6 months this stock lagged the market by 27.7 percentage points (the stock lost 16.7% while the market gained 11.1%)-27.7%
vs market, 12 monthsover the past 12 months this stock lagged the market by 38.8 percentage points (the stock lost 18.3% while the market gained 20.5%)-38.8%

Signal agreement

2
Bullish technical signals2 of the 9 technical signals we can compute for it are currently in a bullish state: a strong uptrend, with buyers in control, trading above the Ichimoku cloud — these describe past price behaviour, not a forecast2 of 9
Bearish technical signals4 of the 9 technical signals we can compute for it are currently in a bearish state: a "death cross" — its 50-day average is below its 200-day, trading below its 200-day average, MACD momentum is negative, lagging the market over 6 months — these describe past price behaviour, not a forecast4 of 9

Trend (Ichimoku cloud)

1
Vs the Ichimoku cloudtrading 2.6% above the Ichimoku cloud — a band drawn from where its own highs and lows sat up to 2026-07-16 and projected forward over today's price, the side traders read as an established uptrend, with the band below acting as the level that would have to give way. The band itself is moderate, spanning 2.4% of the share price.+2.6%

Volume-weighted price

2
Vs this year’s average price paidthe price is 8% below the average price paid so far this year, so the typical buyer over that stretch is under water. That average is $15.78 — a volume-weighted average of daily closes over 157 sessions, not a true tick-by-tick VWAP.-8.0%
Vs the average paid since it last reportedthe price is 1% below the average price paid since it last reported on 2026-08-04 (its 8-K), so the typical buyer over that stretch is under water. That average is $14.67 — a volume-weighted average of daily closes over 14 sessions, not a true tick-by-tick VWAP.-1.1%

Price levels it has turned at before

MAT last closed at $14.51 on 2026-08-21. Since 2024-08-21 it has turned at 1 price below its last close and 12 above; the nearest below and the 3 nearest above are listed, nearest first.

LevelSideDistanceEvidence
$14.82Resistance2.2% above the last closeturned there three times · 2026-02-12 to 2026-07-16
$14.13Support2.6% below the last closeturned there five times · 2025-04-11 to 2026-08-06
$15.48Resistance6.7% above the last closeturned there five times · 2026-03-09 to 2026-08-05
$16.64Resistance14.7% above the last closeturned there twice · 2025-08-01 to 2025-09-30

A level is a price this company reversed or paused at more than once — they describe past behaviour, not a forecast of where the price will go.

Wave structure

Its recent swings can be read as a five-part upward sequence — what Elliott-wave chartists call an impulse — now in leg 3 of five.

This labelling fails — stops being a possible reading at all — if it closes below $14.19.

This is one of several labellings that fit the same swings, so treat it as a reading rather than the reading. It was chosen from 2 labellings that survived the rules, counting shorter readings of the same bars.

On past moves of this shape the leg has usually ended somewhere between $17.11 and $18.92 — that is where it has tended to end if the count holds, not a forecast of where the price goes.

Alternate reading: The same swings also read as a three-part correction in leg C, which fails on a close below $14.19.

This labelling was already in place when we began recording count changes on 2026-08-13, so how long it has stood is not something we can say yet.

Read from daily closes as of 2026-08-21.

An Elliott-wave count describes the swings already printed and the level that would disprove it. It is not a forecast, a target, or advice.

Based on daily closing prices as of 2026-08-21. Describes past price behavior only — informational, not financial advice.

Ask about MAT's technicals →

Analyst consensus

  • Consensus ratingBuy (2.00 mean, 1=Strong Buy…5=Strong Sell) — 13 analysts
  • Mean price target$18.23 range $12.00 – $28.00; median $18.00

Analyst estimates, as of 2026-08-22. These are third-party analyst opinions and price targets, aggregated — not a recommendation, prediction, or advice from stocks-llm. Informational only.

Analyst EPS estimate for MAT

  • Consensus EPS estimate$1.02 next reporting period, as of 2026-08-22

Change over time is not available yet: it needs two readings of the same reporting period at least 30 days apart, and we have been recording these estimates since 2026-08-04. An estimate for a DIFFERENT quarter is not a revision, so a reading from before the last report is never compared with one after it.

The consensus estimate for the next reporting period, and how it has moved between readings of that SAME period. A change is measured only between readings estimating one period — when a company reports, the consensus moves to the next quarter and the two numbers are not comparable. Informational only, not a forecast and not advice.

Ask how MAT's estimates have moved →

Key risks (from latest filing)

["High dependency on consumer discretionary spending and economic conditions.","Concentration of revenue in the second half of the year combined with retail inventory management risks.","Dependence on securing and renewing entertainment property licenses."]

See MAT's biggest risks from its latest 10-Q →

What changed in the latest 10-Q

AI-assisted comparison of MAT's 10-Q filed 2026-05-01 against the prior one filed 2025-10-29.

Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)

  • Added:
    • Newer filing (2026-05-01) adds mission and purpose statement: 'Mattel's mission is to create innovative products and experiences that inspire fans, entertain audiences, and develop children through play, and its purpose is to empower generations to explore the wonder of childhood and reach their full potential.'
    • Newer filing adds five-point brand-centric strategy including 'Scale digital play through mobile games self-publishing, Mattel163 mobile games studio, licensing, and creator platforms' and 'Optimize operations and leverage artificial intelligence across its systems and supply chain.'
    • Newer filing adds 'KPop Demon Hunters' to Dolls category brands list
    • Newer filing reorganizes Infant, Toddler, and Preschool category into three named subcategories with detailed descriptions, removing references to 'Imaginext,' 'Barney,' and 'Fisher-Price Wood'
    • Newer filing adds 'Mattel Brick Shop' as new challenger brand in Building Sets introduced in 2025
    • Newer filing adds 'Toy Story (Disney Pixar)' to Action Figures, Building Sets, Games, and Other category
    • Newer filing reports Q1 2026 net sales increased 4% versus Q1 2025, with gross margin of 44.9% versus 49.4%
    • Newer filing reports completion of Mattel163 Limited acquisition of full ownership on March 2, 2026
  • Removed:
    • Older filing (2025-10-29) describes Mattel as 'leading global toy and family entertainment company' whereas newer filing states 'leading global play and family entertainment company'
    • Older filing states strategy as 'grow its intellectual property (IP) driven toy business and expand its entertainment offering' whereas newer filing states 'brand-centric strategy to grow its intellectual property (IP) driven play and family entertainment business'
    • Older filing includes two-point strategic focus; newer filing replaces with five-point brand-centric strategy
    • Older filing describes Barbie as 'shown them that they can be anything' versus newer filing's 'sparking imaginations and shaping futures through play'
    • Older filing includes 'Imaginext' and 'Barney' in Infant, Toddler, and Preschool category; newer filing removes these
    • Older filing describes Hot Wheels as 'In production for over 50 years' versus newer filing's 'since 1968'
    • Older filing describes MEGA as 'challenger brand in Building Sets' versus newer filing's 'Mattel Brick Shop' as new challenger brand
    • Older filing reports Q3 2025 net sales decreased 6% versus Q3 2024, with gross margin of 50.0% versus 53.1%
    • Older filing discusses Q3 2025 results and third quarter cash position; newer filing discusses Q1 2026 results
  • Reworded:
    • Barbie description changed from 'limited potential of every girl by showing them that they can be anything' to 'limitless potential in every girl, sparking imaginations and shaping futures through play'
    • American Girl description expanded from 'content, gaming, and lifestyle products' in older to 'content, and lifestyle products' in newer (gaming removed)
    • Fisher-Price subcategory description changed from including 'core Infant, Little People, and Newborn product lines, as well as the recently launched Fisher-Price Wood product line' to 'core Infant and Toddler product lines'
    • Preschool Entertainment subcategory changed from 'Barney, Mattel's character based Imaginext line, and partner entertainment brands' to just 'owned IP such as Thomas & Friends and partner entertainment brands'
    • Baby Gear and Power Wheels changed from 'Mattel is strategically out-licensing or exiting' to 'Mattel has strategically out-licensed or exited'
    • Vehicles category reordered in newer filing; appears after Dolls rather than before Action Figures
  • Notes:
    • The newer filing text appears truncated at 'The Mattel163 acquis' and does not provide complete context for that acquisition statement
    • Older filing discusses Q3 2025 and references ongoing trade dynamics; newer filing discusses Q1 2026 with different business context, making some comparisons reflect period-specific rather than strategic changes

Risk Factors

  • Added:
    • Added to forward-looking statements (2026-05-01): 'or by their nature are uncertain' in the identification of forward-looking statements
    • Added to forward-looking statements (2026-05-01): reference to 'the conflict in the Middle East' as specific example of armed hostilities
    • Added to forward-looking statements (2026-05-01): item (xiv) regarding ability to secure, maintain, and renew popular licenses from licensors of entertainment properties (separated as distinct item)
    • Added to forward-looking statements (2026-05-01): item (xv) regarding ability to successfully develop, publish and commercialize digital games (new item)
    • Added to forward-looking statements (2026-05-01): item (xvi) regarding ability to attract and retain talented employees and adapt to evolving workplace models (separated as distinct item)
    • Added to forward-looking statements (2026-05-01): item (xxiv) regarding Mattel's ability to navigate regulatory frameworks in connection with artificial intelligence
    • Added to forward-looking statements (2026-05-01): item (xxv) regarding potential impact of development, use, and integration of artificial intelligence and machine learning technologies
    • Added to forward-looking statements (2026-05-01): item (xxvi) regarding sufficiency of additional controls and procedures to remediate prior material weakness in internal control
  • Removed:
    • Removed from forward-looking statements (2025-10-29): reference to 'non-fungible tokens, and cryptocurrency' in context of regulatory frameworks
    • Removed from forward-looking statements (2025-10-29): specific reference to 'Russia-Ukraine war' and 'geopolitical developments in the Middle East' in favor of more general 'conflict in the Middle East'
    • Removed from forward-looking statements (2025-10-29): reference to 'an inability to remediate the material weakness' language
  • Reworded:
    • Changed (2026-05-01): 'Mattel's goals for future periods' to 'Mattel's plans for future periods'
    • Changed (2026-05-01): 'actual future results or outcomes' to 'actual results or outcomes'
    • Changed (2026-05-01): Restructured item (vi) - added 'labor costs,' with comma after 'labor costs' instead of 'labor costs or'
    • Changed (2026-05-01): Item numbering and restructuring - items (xiii) through (xxvii) are restructured with different groupings compared to items (xiii) through (xxiii) in older filing
    • Changed (2026-05-01): Reference to '2025 Annual Report on Form 10-K' instead of '2024 Annual Report on Form 10-K'
    • Changed (2026-05-01): Removed reference to 'Part II, Item 1A Risk Factors in Mattel's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2025' from list of subsequent periodic filings
    • Changed (2026-05-01): Added 'which, coupled with' changed to 'which coupled with' (removal of comma)
  • Notes:
    • The newer filing section ends mid-balance sheet, so comparison is limited to the Forward-Looking Statements section
    • Page number references changed (Item 1A Risk Factors shown as page 44 in 2026-05-01 vs page 49 in 2025-10-29), but this reflects document pagination changes rather than substantive content changes
    • Financial data tables are not fully comparable due to different reporting periods (March 31, 2026 vs September 30, 2025 as the primary comparison point)

AI-assisted comparison of two SEC filing sections. It describes wording and theme changes only, makes no materiality, legal, or investment judgement, and is not financial advice. Informational only — not financial advice.

Ask what changed in MAT's latest 10-Q →

Insider activity (SEC Form 4)

No open-market insider purchases or sales are on record for MAT — recent Form 4 activity was compensation-related (awards, option exercises, or tax withholding), not open-market buying or selling.

View full insider trading history → View SEC Form 3/4/5 filings

Only open-market purchases (SEC code P) and sales (code S) are counted here. Option exercises, vesting/awards, gifts, and shares withheld for taxes are excluded — they are compensation or mechanical, not open-market conviction. Sales may be planned and non-discretionary (e.g. a Rule 10b5-1 plan) and are not necessarily bearish; open-market buying is not a recommendation to buy. Informational only — not financial advice.

Institutional ownership (13F)

5 institutional 13F filers reported holding MAT as of 2026-03-31 (quarter-end position, filed within 45 days).

  • Distinct 13F filers 5
  • Reported shares held 37,776,153
  • Reported value $548,887,496

reported quarterly holdings change (2025-12-31 → 2026-03-31): 1 new, 3 increased, 1 decreased, 0 exited. Change counts cover only managers that filed 13F reports in BOTH quarters, derived between two quarter-end snapshots — not same-day trades; a single manager is never said to have "bought" or "sold".

Institutional holdings are quarter-end long positions reported on SEC Form 13F-HR, filed up to 45 days after the quarter ends — they are delayed, are not real-time trades, exclude short positions and most non-US securities, and are not investment advice. Any increase/decrease is a reported change between two quarterly snapshots, not a same-day purchase or sale. These are quarter-end snapshots from the 13F filings on SEC EDGAR, filed within 45 days — not real-time, and any change is a difference between two quarterly reports, not a same-day trade. Informational only — not financial advice.

Ask about MAT's institutional holders →

Short interest (FINRA)

MAT had 27,092,095 shares of reported short interest as of the 2026-07-31 FINRA settlement date (delayed, bi-monthly; not real-time).

MAT had 9.48% of its shares outstanding sold short as of the 2026-07-31 FINRA settlement date (percent of FLOAT would be higher — float is not disclosed in the source). FINRA reported 5.94 days to cover at the same settlement.

  • Reported short interest (shares) 27,092,095
  • Short interest (% of shares outstanding) 9.48%
  • Prior settlement (shares) 27,481,840
  • Reported change -1.42%
  • Days to cover (reported) 5.94

Reported to FINRA as of the 2026-07-31 settlement date. Short interest is reported to FINRA and published on a delayed, bi-monthly schedule (as of a settlement date, disseminated roughly eight business days later) — it is NOT real-time, does not cover every venue or all US trading, and is not a short-squeeze prediction or investment advice. Days-to-cover is the value FINRA reports; percent of float is not shown because the source file carries no share-count denominator — where a percent appears it is of shares OUTSTANDING, the larger base, and is therefore a floor on percent of float. Informational only — not financial advice.

Ask about MAT's short interest →

Competitors & peers

AI-enriched competitor set. Linked names are companies covered by stocks-llm; other named peers are shown for reference only.

Not quite? Describe exactly what you want →

Compare MAT vs…

Frequently asked questions

What does Mattel (MAT) do?

Mattel is a leading global toy company that designs, manufactures, and markets a broad portfolio of brands. Its business centers on iconic consumer products including dolls, vehicles, action figures, and construction sets, as well as infant and preschool toys. The company also leverages its intellectual property through entertainment content, digital games, and licensing partnerships.

What sector is Mattel (MAT) in?

Mattel (MAT) is classified in the Consumer Discretionary sector. Its industry is Toys & Games. It trades on NASDAQ.

Who are Mattel's (MAT) competitors?

Notable peers of Mattel (MAT) include Hasbro, LEGO Group, Spin Master and Funko. This peer set is informational only — not financial advice.

Is Mattel (MAT) overbought or oversold right now?

Mattel (MAT) is currently neither overbought nor oversold — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 48, in the neutral middle (as of 2026-08-21). RSI describes recent price momentum, not a forecast — informational only, not financial advice.

Where does stocks-llm's data on MAT come from?

Fundamentals and prices come from market data, as of 2026-08-24; company filings and profile facts come from SEC EDGAR. All figures are delayed daily-close data shown with their as-of date — informational only, not financial advice.

Fundamentals: market data, as of 2026-08-24. Filings: SEC EDGAR. Prices are delayed daily-close data.

Last updated 2026-08-21.

Informational only — NOT financial advice. All figures are delayed daily-close data from SEC EDGAR & market data, shown with their as-of date.

Research stocks in your own words.

Informational only — NOT financial advice.

ScreenersBlogPrivacyiOS app