MOELIS CLASS A (MC)
Financials · Investment Banking & Brokerage · NYSE
Moelis & Company is a leading global independent investment bank providing strategic and financial advisory services to corporations, governments, and financial sponsors.
What MOELIS CLASS A does
Moelis & Company is an independent investment bank that provides financial advisory services to a diverse client base, including corporations, financial sponsors, governments, and boards of directors. The firm specializes in strategic advisory services, such as mergers and acquisitions, capital structure advisory, and financial restructuring. Moelis operates globally, offering expertise across various industries to help clients execute complex financial and strategic transactions.
Themes: M&A activity, corporate restructuring, financial advisory services, capital markets advisory
Fundamentals
- Price$53.85 as of 2026-10-20 close
- Market cap$4.3B as of 2026-06-30 (share count; price 2026-10-20)
- 1-year return-21.6% 2025-10-20 close $68.65 → 2026-10-20 close $53.85
- P/E18.76 as of 2026-10-20; diluted EPS of the listed share class, as reported in the 10-Q/10-K
- ROE+38.2% FY2025, SEC XBRL
- ROICn/a No figure: it is a bank or insurer, whose operating income and debt are not what ROIC divides.
- Debt / equityn/a No figure: its filing tags none of the debt lines we read, which is not evidence of zero debt.
- Beta1.51 as of 2026-09-03
- Last reported earnings2026-07-29 SEC EDGAR Form 8-K (Item 2.02)
Dividend: yield +4.4%; pays a dividend.
How MC compares in its sector
- price-to-earnings ratiotop 25% 487 covered Financials peers, as of 2026-10-20
- return on equitytop 10% 558 covered Financials peers, as of 2026-09-03
- indicated dividend yieldtop 25% 440 covered Financials peers, as of 2026-09-03
- free cash flow (absolute dollars, latest fiscal year)top 25% 430 covered Financials peers, as of FY2025
Position among covered Financials companies that report each metric (minimum 5 peers). A relative position within our covered catalog — not a valuation, quality, or investment judgment. A higher percentile is simply a higher value (for P/E, more expensive on earnings — never "better"). Informational only.
Dividend coverage
Not assessed — last reported dividend predates the accounts. The most recent fiscal year in which MC reported a dividend payment is FY2024, while its reported financial statements run through FY2025. Coverage is therefore not assessed for the latest year — an FY2024 ratio would not describe MC today.
Coverage is derived from reported SEC EDGAR XBRL figures, comparing dividends paid against net income and free cash flow for the SAME fiscal year. It is not shown here because the latest fiscal year with a reported dividend payment (FY2024) is older than the latest year of reported financial statements (FY2025), so any ratio would describe an out-of-date year. Informational only — not financial advice.
Quarterly results
| Quarter | Operating income | Net income | Operating cash flow | Capex |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 FY2026 2026-06-30 | $73M | $55M | $230M† | $14M† |
| Q1 FY2026 2026-03-31 | $40M | $42M | -$279M | $13M |
| Q4 FY2025 2025-12-31 | $128M† | $99M† | $339M† | $9M† |
| Q3 FY2025 2025-09-30 | $48M | $60M | $199M† | $19M† |
| Q2 FY2025 2025-06-30 | $61M | $47M | $204M† | $5M† |
| Q1 FY2025 2025-03-31 | $37M | $54M | -$165M | $3M |
| Q4 FY2024 2024-12-31 | $132M† | $100M† | $315M† | $2M† |
| Q3 FY2024 2024-09-30 | $16M | $19M | $137M† | $2M† |
† Not filed as a discrete quarter: derived from the company's own year-to-date figures (for example the fourth quarter as the fiscal year minus the first nine months). A derived per-share figure is approximate, because the share count moves within the year.
Balance sheet at 2026-06-30
- Cash and equivalents$208M
- Total debtnot shown the filing tags none of the debt lines we read — not evidence of zero debt
From the company's own SEC 10-Q and 10-K filings (XBRL), re-read every week. Figures in US dollars as filed; informational only — not financial advice.
How MOELIS CLASS A looks technically
MOELIS CLASS A (MC) is trading 16.8% below its 200-day average, the long-term trend line — a long-term downtrend. Its 50-day average crossed below its 200-day average about 18 trading days ago — a "death cross", a bearish long-term signal. A strong downtrend is in place — ADX, a 0–100 trend-strength gauge, is 42, with sellers in control. Momentum is neutral — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 33, neither overbought (above 70) nor oversold (below 30). MACD, a trend-momentum gauge, turned bullish about 1 trading day ago (its momentum flipped positive). It made a new 20-day low about 2 trading days ago. It is 31.2% below its highest point of the past year.
Trend
8
| Distance from the 200-day | it is trading 16.8% below its 200-day average, the long-term trend line — a long-term downtrend | -16.8% |
|---|---|---|
| 50-day moving average | its average price over the last 50 trading days — a short-term trend line — is $62.04 | $62.04 |
| 200-day moving average | its average price over the last 200 trading days — the long-term trend line — is $64.73 | $64.73 |
| Swing structure | each recent peak has been lower than the one before it and each dip deeper — the pattern chart-watchers call a downtrend, which describes where price has already been and not where it goes next | lower highs and lower lows |
| Last swing turn | its last significant turn was a swing low 34 calendar days ago — the swings before that are what the structure reading is measured on | 34 sessions |
| Wave structure | its recent swings can be read as a five-part downward sequence — what Elliott-wave chartists call an impulse — now in the fourth leg, a pullback against that downward direction; the labelling fails if price closes above 62.945. It is the only labelling that fits, though not with textbook proportions, and it describes the swings already printed, not what comes next. | possible downward five-wave sequence, in wave 4 (atypical proportions) |
| Since the 50/200 cross | its 50-day average crossed below its 200-day average about 18 trading days ago — a "death cross", a bearish long-term signal | 18 sessions |
| Trend strength (14-day ADX) | a strong downtrend is in place — ADX, a 0–100 trend-strength gauge, is 42, with sellers in control | 41.9 |
Momentum
3
| 14-day RSI | momentum is neutral — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 33, neither overbought (above 70) nor oversold (below 30) | 32.9 |
|---|---|---|
| Position in its 14-day range | it is trading in the lower half of its 14-day range ($52.71 to $58.28) — its "stochastic" reading is 20 out of 100, where 0 would mean closing exactly at the 14-session low and 100 exactly at the high. This measures WHERE the price sits inside its recent range, which is a different question from the RSI beside it: RSI is a momentum gauge, measuring how FAST the price has been moving, so a stock can drift quietly to the bottom of its range with an ordinary RSI, or fall sharply and still sit in the middle. It has been climbing within that range over the last few sessions. | 20.5 |
| Since the MACD crossed zero | MACD, a trend-momentum gauge, turned bullish about 1 trading day ago (its momentum flipped positive) | 1 session |
Range
12
| 52-week high | its highest closing price over the past year (about 252 trading days) was $78.22 | $78.22 |
|---|---|---|
| From the 52-week high | it is 31.2% below its 52-week high (its highest price of the past year) | -31.1% |
| Above the 52-week low | it is 5.5% above its 52-week low (its lowest price of the past year) | +5.5% |
| Below the 52-week high | it is 31.2% below its highest point of the past year | 31.1% |
| Since a 20-day breakout | it made a new 20-day low about 2 trading days ago | 2 sessions |
| Since a 55-day breakout | it made a new 55-day low about 2 trading days ago | 2 sessions |
| All-time high | its highest closing price on record is $82.89 (set on 2025-02-06) | $82.89 |
| Given back of the 52-week move | over the past year its closes ranged ($51.38 to $77.75), and it has recovered only a small part of its fall from last year’s high — 9% of it. Chart-watchers call 61.8%-65% given back the "golden pocket" — for this company that is $67.68 to $68.52. It is watched widely enough that orders cluster there, which is the honest reason it matters; it is not a forecast. | 9.4% |
| From the all-time high | it is 35.0% below its all-time high | -35.0% |
| Nearest price level | it is trading 2.6% below a resistance level at $55.25 — a price it turned at three times since 2025-04-23, most recently on 2025-06-13. Since 2024-10-21 it has 0 such levels below the current price and 13 above. Levels like these describe where the price has reversed or paused before; they are not a forecast of where it will go. | +2.6% |
| All-time low | its lowest closing price on record is $21.27 (set on 2016-07-06) | $21.27 |
| Above the all-time low | it is 153.2% above its all-time low | +153.2% |
Volatility
5
| Band width vs its own 6 months | day-to-day price swings are about average versus its own recent 6-month history | 39th percentile |
|---|---|---|
| Typical daily range | in a typical session it travels about $2.04 between its high and its low — about 3.8% of its price. That is its "average true range" over the last 14 sessions, which also counts the distance from the previous close, so a day that opens well away from yesterday counts as the large move it was | $2.04 |
| Bollinger bands (20-day, ±2σ) | most of its recent trading has stayed between about $53.37 and $59.44 — the "Bollinger bands", a range drawn two standard deviations either side of its 20-day average price, which widens when the stock gets more volatile and narrows when it settles | $53.37 – $56.40 – $59.44 |
| Typical daily range (% of price) | its price moves about 3.8% in a typical session — about typical for the companies we cover. This is the average gap between a session's high and low over the last 14 sessions, counting overnight moves, expressed against the current price so it can be compared with companies trading at any price | 3.8% |
| Stretch from the 200-day average | it is trading 5.3 daily ranges below its 200-day average price (16.8% below it in plain percentage terms) — a way of asking how far it has stretched from its own average in units of how far it normally moves in a day, so a calm company and a jumpy one can be compared on the same scale | 5.3 daily ranges below its 200-day average |
Volume
1
| Volume vs its 30-day average | trading volume is about normal versus its 30-day average | 1.05× |
|---|
Analyst
2
| Change in the average price target | analysts have cut their average price target by 1.7% since the prior reading | -1.8% |
|---|---|---|
| Change in the consensus rating | the analyst consensus rating is unchanged since the prior reading | unchanged |
Candlestick patterns
3
| Since a doji | 9 sessions ago it opened and closed at almost the same price after trading through a wider range — a "doji", the classic picture of buyers and sellers finishing the session level | 9 sessions ago |
|---|---|---|
| Since a hammer | 9 sessions ago, after a stretch of decline, it sold off hard during the session and then closed back near its high — a "hammer", the long lower wick showing the drop was bought back before the close | 9 sessions ago |
| Since a bearish engulfing | 5 sessions ago it opened above the previous session's close and finished below that session's open — a "bearish engulfing" pair, where one down day more than undid the up day before it | 5 sessions ago |
Price gaps
3
| Gap at the open | it opened on 2026-10-20 at essentially the same price it closed at the session before — no meaningful overnight gap | -0.0% |
|---|---|---|
| Open gap | it gapped 2.1% below the previous close 4 sessions ago and has not traded back through the level it left behind at 56.39 — an "unfilled gap", which describes a price range no trade has since crossed and is not a forecast that it will be crossed | -2.1% |
| Gap filled | a 2.3% gap up opened on 2026-09-17 has been "filled" 22 sessions ago — price traded back through the level the gap left behind, and it took 1 session to close | 22 sessions ago |
Price streaks
1
| Closing streak | it closed higher in its latest session, after a session that did not close higher — a single up day rather than a run | 1 session up |
|---|
Relative strength
4
| vs market, 1 month | over the past 1 month this stock lagged the market by 10.8 percentage points (the stock lost 9.8% while the market gained 1.0%) | -10.8% |
|---|---|---|
| vs market, 3 months | over the past 3 months this stock lagged the market by 23.3 percentage points (the stock lost 19.7% while the market gained 3.6%) | -23.3% |
| vs market, 6 months | over the past 6 months this stock lagged the market by 30.1 percentage points (the stock lost 21.6% while the market gained 8.5%) | -30.1% |
| vs market, 12 months | over the past 12 months this stock lagged the market by 36.1 percentage points (the stock lost 21.6% while the market gained 14.6%) | -36.1% |
Signal agreement
2
| Bullish technical signals | 1 of the 9 technical signals we can compute for it is currently in a bullish state: MACD momentum is positive — these describe past price behaviour, not a forecast | 1 of 9 |
|---|---|---|
| Bearish technical signals | 6 of the 9 technical signals we can compute for it are currently in a bearish state: a "death cross" — its 50-day average is below its 200-day, trading below its 200-day average, a fresh 20-day low, a strong downtrend, with sellers in control, lagging the market over 6 months, trading below the Ichimoku cloud — these describe past price behaviour, not a forecast | 6 of 9 |
Trend (Ichimoku cloud)
1
| Vs the Ichimoku cloud | trading 19% below the Ichimoku cloud — a band drawn from where its own highs and lows sat up to 2026-09-14 and projected forward over today's price, the side traders read as an established downtrend, with the band above acting as the level that would have to be cleared. The band itself is moderate, spanning 2.1% of the share price. | -18.7% |
|---|
Volume-weighted price
2
| Vs this year’s average price paid | the price is 15% below the average price paid so far this year, so the typical buyer over that stretch is under water. That average is $63.64 — a volume-weighted average of daily closes over 199 sessions, not a true tick-by-tick VWAP. | -15.4% |
|---|---|---|
| Vs the average paid since it last reported | the price is 13% below the average price paid since it last reported on 2026-07-29 (its 8-K), so the typical buyer over that stretch is under water. That average is $62.21 — a volume-weighted average of daily closes over 59 sessions, not a true tick-by-tick VWAP. | -13.4% |
Price levels it has turned at before
MC last closed at $53.85 on 2026-10-20. Since 2024-10-21 it has turned at 0 prices below its last close and 13 above; the 3 nearest above are listed, nearest first.
| Level | Side | Distance | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| $55.25 | Resistance | 2.6% above the last close | turned there three times · 2025-04-23 to 2025-06-13 |
| $57.94 | Resistance | 7.6% above the last close | turned there three times · 2025-03-13 to 2026-10-13 |
| $59.58 | Resistance | 10.6% above the last close | turned there twice · 2025-06-06 to 2025-11-17 |
A level is a price this company reversed or paused at more than once — they describe past behaviour, not a forecast of where the price will go.
Wave structure
Its recent swings can be read as a five-part downward sequence — what Elliott-wave chartists call an impulse — now in leg 4 of five, a pullback against that direction.
This labelling fails — stops being a possible reading at all — if it closes above $62.95.
It is the only labelling that fits these swings, though its proportions are not the textbook ones.
On past moves of this shape the leg has usually ended somewhere between $60.72 and $62.95 — that is where it has tended to end if the count holds, not a forecast of where the price goes.
This reading has stood for 20 trading days, since 2026-09-23.
Read from daily closes as of 2026-10-20.
An Elliott-wave count describes the swings already printed and the level that would disprove it. It is not a forecast, a target, or advice.
Screens: Trading below the 200-day moving average · Trading below the 50-day moving average · Recent death cross (50-day crossed below 200-day) · Pulled back from the 12-month high · Broke down to a new 20-day low · MACD just crossed bullish (12/26/9) | Learn: moving average · golden cross · adx · rsi · macd · breakout · fifty two week high low
Based on daily closing prices as of 2026-10-20. Describes past price behavior only — informational, not financial advice.
Analyst consensus
- Consensus ratingHold (2.64 mean, 1=Strong Buy…5=Strong Sell) — 10 analysts
- Mean price target$67.50 range $58.00 – $80.00; median $67.00
Analyst estimates, as of 2026-10-17. These are third-party analyst opinions and price targets, aggregated — not a recommendation, prediction, or advice from stocks-llm. Informational only.
Analyst EPS estimate for MC
- Consensus EPS estimate$0.7257 next reporting period, as of 2026-10-17
- Estimate change, 30 days-$0.03103 (-4.1%) from $0.7568, on 2026-09-12, 35-day window
- Readings revised upward10% of 10 comparable readings
The consensus estimate for the next reporting period, and how it has moved between readings of that SAME period. A change is measured only between readings estimating one period — when a company reports, the consensus moves to the next quarter and the two numbers are not comparable. Informational only, not a forecast and not advice.
Key risks (from latest filing)
["Dependence on the global M&A and corporate advisory environment, which is highly cyclical and sensitive to broader economic conditions.","The firm's success is heavily reliant on the retention and performance of its key professional personnel.","Potential for significant reputational risk if transactions or advisory services are perceived to be unsuccessful or involved in conflicts of interest."]
What changed in the latest 10-Q
AI-assisted comparison of MC's 10-Q filed 2026-07-30 against the prior one filed 2026-04-30.
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
- Added:
- Newer filing (2026-07-30) states: "As of June 30, 2026, we served our clients globally with 1,016 advisory bankers." Older filing (2026-04-30) stated: "As of March 31, 2026, we served our clients globally with 1,027 advisory bankers."
- Newer filing (2026-07-30) added a results of operations table with figures for the three and six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025.
- Newer filing (2026-07-30) added the following sentence to the Business Environment and Outlook section: "The pursuit of scale, supported by a more accommodative U.S. regulatory environment, is a primary driver of M&A activity..."
- Newer filing (2026-07-30) added the following clause to the Business Environment and Outlook section: "The expansion of our capital markets platform spanning both the public and private capital markets has positioned us to deliver comprehensive financing solutions amid constructive capital markets conditions. Through our continued investment, our private capital advisory business has become a core pillar of our client offering and the team is actively executing and winning new mandates."
- Removed:
- Older filing (2026-04-30) stated: "As of March 31, 2026, we served our clients globally with 1,027 advisory bankers." This statement was replaced in the newer filing (2026-07-30) with a June 30, 2026 count.
- Older filing (2026-04-30) stated: "Following substantial investment in 2025, our private capital advisory business has become a core pillar of our client offering and the team is actively executing and winning new business." This sentence was replaced in the newer filing (2026-07-30) with a revised sentence.
- Older filing (2026-04-30) contained a results of operations table for the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025. This table was replaced in the newer filing (2026-07-30) with a table for the three and six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025.
- Reworded:
- Older filing (2026-04-30) stated data was obtained "...as of April 8, 2026 and April 7, 2025, respectively." Newer filing (2026-07-30) states data was obtained "...as of July 7, 2026 and July 7, 2025, respectively."
- Older filing (2026-04-30) stated: "The M&A market data for announced and completed transactions during the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025...". Newer filing (2026-07-30) states: "The M&A market data for announced and completed transactions during the three and six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025..."
- Older filing (2026-04-30) stated: "For the first three months of 2026, we earned GAAP revenues of $319.8 million compared with $306.6 million earned during the same period in 2025. This represents an increase of 4% compared to a 7% increase in the number of global completed M&A transactions greater than $100 million in the same period." Newer filing (2026-07-30) states: "For the first six months of 2026, we earned GAAP revenues of $729.2 million compared with $672.0 million earned during the same period in 2025. This represents an increase of 9% compared to a 13% increase in the number of global completed M&A transactions greater than $100 million in the same period."
- Older filing (2026-04-30) stated: "Rapid technological change, particularly related to AI, is driving companies to reevaluate their positioning and long-term competitiveness in an evolving market, supporting the need for strategic transactions and the demand for scale." Newer filing (2026-07-30) states: "...rapid technological change, particularly related to artificial intelligence technologies (\"AI\"), continues to drive companies to revalue their positioning and long-term competitiveness, supporting the need for strategic transactions."
- Older filing (2026-04-30) stated: "In addition, recent market dislocation and evolving credit conditions are contributing to increased demand for liability management transactions..." Newer filing (2026-07-30) states: "Evolving credit conditions and increased lender selectivity are contributing to increased demand for liability management transactions..."
- Older filing (2026-04-30) stated: "As capital markets adjust to recent market disruption, demand for customized financing solutions has also increased." This sentence does not appear in the newer filing (2026-07-30).
- Older filing (2026-04-30) stated: "...volatility driven by recent geopolitical events...". Newer filing (2026-07-30) states: "...volatility driven by geopolitical events..."
- Older filing (2026-04-30) stated: "The following is a discussion of our results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025." Newer filing (2026-07-30) states: "The following is a discussion of our results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025."
- Newer filing (2026-07-30) removed the note "N/M = not meaningful" that appeared in the older filing (2026-04-30) results of operations table.
- Notes:
- The source texts appear truncated; both MD&A sections end mid-sentence at "We add new clients" and "We earn subst", respectively. Only the portions provided were compared.
AI-assisted comparison of two SEC filing sections. It describes wording and theme changes only, makes no materiality, legal, or investment judgement, and is not financial advice. Informational only — not financial advice.
Insider activity (SEC Form 4)
0 open-market purchases and 2 open-market sales by insiders in the last 90 days, of which we have read Form 4 filings through 2026-10-16. The 5 days since 2026-10-16 have not been checked yet.
- Last 90 days · read to 2026-10-160 buys · 2 sells ($466007) — 2 selling insiders
- Last 180 days · read to 2026-10-160 buys · 2 sells ($466007) — 2 selling insiders
Activity heuristic: net selling (a transparent product heuristic from the counts above, not a prediction or advice)
Most recent open-market transaction: 2026-08-27. Based on Form 4 filings read through 2026-10-16; anything filed since is not yet included.
View full insider trading history → View SEC Form 3/4/5 filingsAsk about MC's insider activity →
Only open-market purchases (SEC code P) and sales (code S) are counted here. Option exercises, vesting/awards, gifts, and shares withheld for taxes are excluded — they are compensation or mechanical, not open-market conviction. Sales may be planned and non-discretionary (e.g. a Rule 10b5-1 plan) and are not necessarily bearish; open-market buying is not a recommendation to buy. Informational only — not financial advice.
Institutional ownership (13F)
5 institutional 13F filers reported holding MC as of 2026-06-30 (quarter-end position, filed within 45 days).
- Distinct 13F filers 5
- Reported shares held 13,995,094
- Reported value $915,559,060
reported quarterly holdings change (2026-03-31 → 2026-06-30): 0 new, 4 increased, 1 decreased, 0 exited. Change counts cover only managers that filed 13F reports in BOTH quarters, derived between two quarter-end snapshots — not same-day trades; a single manager is never said to have "bought" or "sold".
Institutional holdings are quarter-end long positions reported on SEC Form 13F-HR, filed up to 45 days after the quarter ends — they are delayed, are not real-time trades, exclude short positions and most non-US securities, and are not investment advice. Any increase/decrease is a reported change between two quarterly snapshots, not a same-day purchase or sale. These are quarter-end snapshots from the 13F filings on SEC EDGAR, filed within 45 days — not real-time, and any change is a difference between two quarterly reports, not a same-day trade. Informational only — not financial advice.
Ask about MC's institutional holders → See what each manager we track holds →
Short interest (FINRA)
MC had 5,273,812 shares of reported short interest as of the 2026-09-30 FINRA settlement date (delayed, bi-monthly; not real-time).
Short interest as a percent of shares outstanding is not shown for MC because we do not hold a verified share count to divide it by. The reported figures above are unaffected.
- Reported short interest (shares) 5,273,812
- Prior settlement (shares) 5,358,237
- Reported change -1.58%
- Days to cover (reported) 6.11
Reported to FINRA as of the 2026-09-30 settlement date. Short interest is reported to FINRA and published on a delayed, bi-monthly schedule (as of a settlement date, disseminated roughly eight business days later) — it is NOT real-time, does not cover every venue or all US trading, and is not a short-squeeze prediction or investment advice. Days-to-cover is the value FINRA reports; percent of float is not shown because the source file carries no share-count denominator — where a percent appears it is of shares OUTSTANDING, the larger base, and is therefore a floor on percent of float. Informational only — not financial advice.
Competitors & peers
- Evercore (EVR)
- Lazard (LAZ)
- Houlihan Lokey (HLI)
- Perella Weinberg Partners (PWP)
- Greenhill & Co. (now part of Mizuho)
- Centerview Partners
- PJT Partners (PJT)
AI-enriched competitor set. Linked names are companies covered by stocks-llm; other named peers are shown for reference only.
Compare MC vs…
MOELIS CLASS A is found in…
MC ranks in…
Frequently asked questions
What does MOELIS CLASS A (MC) do?
Moelis & Company is an independent investment bank that provides financial advisory services to a diverse client base, including corporations, financial sponsors, governments, and boards of directors. The firm specializes in strategic advisory services, such as mergers and acquisitions, capital structure advisory, and financial restructuring. Moelis operates globally, offering expertise across various industries to help clients execute complex financial and strategic transactions.
What sector is MOELIS CLASS A (MC) in?
MOELIS CLASS A (MC) is classified in the Financials sector. Its industry is Investment Banking & Brokerage. It trades on NYSE.
Does MC pay a dividend?
Yes — MOELIS CLASS A (MC) pays a dividend, with an indicated yield of about 4.35% (market data, as of 2026-09-03). Informational only — not financial advice.
Who are MOELIS CLASS A's (MC) competitors?
Notable peers of MOELIS CLASS A (MC) include Evercore, Lazard, Houlihan Lokey, Perella Weinberg Partners and Greenhill & Co. (now part of Mizuho). This peer set is informational only — not financial advice.
Is MOELIS CLASS A (MC) overbought or oversold right now?
MOELIS CLASS A (MC) is currently neither overbought nor oversold — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 33, in the neutral middle (as of 2026-10-20). RSI describes recent price momentum, not a forecast — informational only, not financial advice.
Where does stocks-llm's data on MC come from?
Fundamentals come from SEC XBRL company filings for the figures marked with a fiscal year, and market data, as of 2026-09-03 for the rest; prices are market data, as of 2026-09-03; company filings and profile facts come from SEC EDGAR. All figures are delayed daily-close data shown with their as-of date — informational only, not financial advice.
Fundamentals: SEC XBRL company filings for the figures marked with a fiscal year, and market data, as of 2026-09-03 for the rest. Filings: SEC EDGAR. Prices are delayed daily-close data.
Last updated 2026-10-20.
Informational only — NOT financial advice. All figures are delayed daily-close data from SEC EDGAR & market data, shown with their as-of date.