MOELIS CLASS A (MC)
Financials · Investment Banking & Brokerage · NYSE
Moelis & Company is a leading global independent investment bank providing strategic and financial advisory services to corporations, governments, and financial sponsors.
What MOELIS CLASS A does
Moelis & Company is an independent investment bank that provides financial advisory services to a diverse client base, including corporations, financial sponsors, governments, and boards of directors. The firm specializes in strategic advisory services, such as mergers and acquisitions, capital structure advisory, and financial restructuring. Moelis operates globally, offering expertise across various industries to help clients execute complex financial and strategic transactions.
Themes: M&A activity, corporate restructuring, financial advisory services, capital markets advisory
Fundamentals
- Price$68.29 as of 2026-08-21 close
- Market cap$5.7B as of 2026-08-24
- 1-year return-1.6% 2025-08-21 close $69.38 → 2026-08-21 close $68.29
- P/E25.01 as of 2026-08-24
- Net margin+14.5% as of 2026-08-24
- ROE+43.5% as of 2026-08-24
- Debt / equity0.00 as of 2026-08-24
- Revenue growth (YoY)+13.7% as of 2026-08-24
- Beta1.90 as of 2026-08-24
- Last reported earnings2026-07-29 SEC EDGAR Form 8-K (Item 2.02)
Dividend: yield +5.3%; pays a dividend.
How MC compares in its sector
- price-to-earnings ratiotop 25% 525 covered Financials peers, as of 2026-08-24
- net profit marginmiddle range 538 covered Financials peers, as of 2026-08-24
- operating marginmiddle range 534 covered Financials peers, as of 2026-08-24
- return on equitytop 10% 575 covered Financials peers, as of 2026-08-24
- indicated dividend yieldtop 25% 453 covered Financials peers, as of 2026-08-24
- free cash flow (absolute dollars, latest fiscal year)top 25% 431 covered Financials peers, as of FY2025
Position among covered Financials companies that report each metric (minimum 5 peers). A relative position within our covered catalog — not a valuation, quality, or investment judgment. A higher percentile is simply a higher value (for P/E, more expensive on earnings — never "better"). Informational only.
Top 10 scores & list membership
MC is not currently in any published Top 10 list. Its scores are below.
Long-term score
Not scored for the long-term list: no shareholder return data.
Short-term score
59.5 #243 of 1,704 scored · #40 of 277 in Financials
Catalysts 75th: open-market insider buys in 90 days 38, analysts have raised their average price target by 0.7% since the prior reading; setup 65th: day-to-day price swings are unusually narrow versus its own recent history — a "Bollinger squeeze" (in the tightest 8% of the past ~6 months), which often precedes a bigger move; weakest is trend 52nd: a "golden cross" — its 50-day average is above its 200-day.
Scores as of 21 Aug 2026. Each bar is a percentile: how this company ranked against every company the score ranked, 0–100. A list is a published formula and its output, not a recommendation. Method version 2.
Dividend coverage
Not assessed — last reported dividend predates the accounts. The most recent fiscal year in which MC reported a dividend payment is FY2024, while its reported financial statements run through FY2025. Coverage is therefore not assessed for the latest year — an FY2024 ratio would not describe MC today.
Coverage is derived from reported SEC EDGAR XBRL figures, comparing dividends paid against net income and free cash flow for the SAME fiscal year. It is not shown here because the latest fiscal year with a reported dividend payment (FY2024) is older than the latest year of reported financial statements (FY2025), so any ratio would describe an out-of-date year. Informational only — not financial advice.
How MOELIS CLASS A looks technically
MOELIS CLASS A (MC) is trading 3.8% above its 200-day average, the long-term trend line — a longer-term uptrend. Its 50-day average crossed above its 200-day average about 36 trading days ago — a "golden cross", a bullish long-term signal. There is no clear trend right now — the price is choppy (ADX, a 0–100 trend-strength gauge, is 8, below the 25 that marks a real trend). Momentum is neutral — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 52, neither overbought (above 70) nor oversold (below 30). MACD, a trend-momentum gauge, turned bullish about 1 trading day ago (its momentum flipped positive). It made a new 20-day high about 7 trading days ago. Day-to-day price swings are unusually narrow versus its own recent history — a "Bollinger squeeze" (in the tightest 8% of the past ~6 months), which often precedes a bigger move.
Trend
9
| Distance from the 200-day | it is trading 3.8% above its 200-day average, the long-term trend line — a longer-term uptrend | +3.8% |
|---|---|---|
| 50-day moving average | its average price over the last 50 trading days — a short-term trend line — is $67.15 | $67.15 |
| 200-day moving average | its average price over the last 200 trading days — the long-term trend line — is $65.82 | $65.82 |
| Swing structure | its recent peaks and dips disagree — one of them is rising while the other is not, so there is no clean up or down pattern in the swings | mixed — one of the two is not confirming |
| Last swing turn | its last significant turn was a swing high 8 calendar days ago — the swings before that are what the structure reading is measured on | 8 sessions |
| Wave structure | its recent swings can be read as a completed three-part upward correction — a pullback in the A-B-C shape Elliott-wave chartists use; the labelling fails if price closes above 70.51. It is the only labelling that fits, though not with textbook proportions, and it describes the swings already printed, not what comes next. | possible three-wave upward correction, complete (atypical proportions) |
| Since the 50/200 cross | its 50-day average crossed above its 200-day average about 36 trading days ago — a "golden cross", a bullish long-term signal | 36 sessions |
| Above the 200-day after a dip | it recently dipped to its 200-day average (the long-term trend line) and has since climbed back above it — now about 3.8% above | +3.8% |
| Trend strength (14-day ADX) | there is no clear trend right now — the price is choppy (ADX, a 0–100 trend-strength gauge, is 8, below the 25 that marks a real trend) | 7.9 |
Momentum
3
| 14-day RSI | momentum is neutral — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 52, neither overbought (above 70) nor oversold (below 30) | 52.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Position in its 14-day range | it is trading in the upper half of its 14-day range ($62.95 to $70.51) — its "stochastic" reading is 71 out of 100, where 0 would mean closing exactly at the 14-session low and 100 exactly at the high. This measures WHERE the price sits inside its recent range, which is a different question from the RSI beside it: RSI is a momentum gauge, measuring how FAST the price has been moving, so a stock can drift quietly to the bottom of its range with an ordinary RSI, or fall sharply and still sit in the middle. It has been climbing within that range over the last few sessions. | 70.7 |
| Since the MACD crossed zero | MACD, a trend-momentum gauge, turned bullish about 1 trading day ago (its momentum flipped positive) | 1 session |
Range
12
| 52-week high | its highest closing price over the past year (about 252 trading days) was $78.22 | $78.22 |
|---|---|---|
| From the 52-week high | it is 12.7% below its 52-week high (its highest price of the past year) | -12.7% |
| Above the 52-week low | it is 33.7% above its 52-week low (its lowest price of the past year) | +33.7% |
| Below the 52-week high | it is 12.7% below its highest point of the past year | 12.7% |
| Since a 20-day breakout | it made a new 20-day high about 7 trading days ago | 7 sessions |
| Since a 55-day breakout | it made a new 55-day high about 35 trading days ago | 35 sessions |
| All-time high | its highest closing price on record is $82.89 (set on 2025-02-06) | $82.89 |
| Given back of the 52-week move | over the past year its closes ranged ($51.38 to $77.75), and it has recovered close to two thirds of its fall from last year’s high — 64% of it. Chart-watchers call 61.8%-65% given back the "golden pocket", and this is inside it — for this company that is $67.68 to $68.52. It is watched widely enough that orders cluster there, which is the honest reason it matters; it is not a forecast. | 64.1% |
| From the all-time high | it is 17.6% below its all-time high | -17.6% |
| Nearest price level | it is sitting right on a resistance level at $68.52 — a price it turned at five times since 2025-07-22, most recently on 2026-02-03. Since 2024-08-21 it has 6 such levels below the current price and 6 above. Levels like these describe where the price has reversed or paused before; they are not a forecast of where it will go. | +0.3% |
| All-time low | its lowest closing price on record is $21.27 (set on 2016-07-06) | $21.27 |
| Above the all-time low | it is 221.0% above its all-time low | +221.0% |
Volatility
5
| Band width vs its own 6 months | day-to-day price swings are unusually narrow versus its own recent history — a "Bollinger squeeze" (in the tightest 8% of the past ~6 months), which often precedes a bigger move | 8th percentile |
|---|---|---|
| Typical daily range | in a typical session it travels about $2.67 between its high and its low — about 3.9% of its price. That is its "average true range" over the last 14 sessions, which also counts the distance from the previous close, so a day that opens well away from yesterday counts as the large move it was | $2.67 |
| Bollinger bands (20-day, ±2σ) | most of its recent trading has stayed between about $64.54 and $70.47 — the "Bollinger bands", a range drawn two standard deviations either side of its 20-day average price, which widens when the stock gets more volatile and narrows when it settles | $64.54 – $67.50 – $70.47 |
| Typical daily range (% of price) | its price moves about 3.9% in a typical session — about typical for the companies we cover. This is the average gap between a session's high and low over the last 14 sessions, counting overnight moves, expressed against the current price so it can be compared with companies trading at any price | 3.9% |
| Stretch from the 200-day average | it is trading 0.9 daily ranges above its 200-day average price (3.8% above it in plain percentage terms) — a way of asking how far it has stretched from its own average in units of how far it normally moves in a day, so a calm company and a jumpy one can be compared on the same scale | 0.9 daily ranges above its 200-day average |
Volume
1
| Volume vs its 30-day average | trading volume is about normal versus its 30-day average | 0.86× |
|---|
Analyst
2
| Change in the average price target | analysts have raised their average price target by 0.7% since the prior reading | +0.7% |
|---|---|---|
| Change in the consensus rating | the analyst consensus rating is unchanged since the prior reading | unchanged |
Candlestick patterns
1
| Since a doji | 3 sessions ago it opened and closed at almost the same price after trading through a wider range — a "doji", the classic picture of buyers and sellers finishing the session level | 3 sessions ago |
|---|
Price gaps
1
| Gap filled | a 2.3% gap up opened on 2026-07-30 has been "filled" 16 sessions ago — price traded back through the level the gap left behind, and it closed again during the very session that opened it | 16 sessions ago |
|---|
Price streaks
1
| Closing streak | it closed higher in its latest session, after a session that did not close higher — a single up day rather than a run | 1 session up |
|---|
Relative strength
4
| vs market, 1 month | over the past 1 month this stock lagged the market by 1.7 percentage points (the stock gained 0.6% while the market gained 2.3%) | -1.7% |
|---|---|---|
| vs market, 3 months | over the past 3 months this stock beat the market by 0.9 percentage points (the stock gained 4.0% while the market gained 3.1%) | +0.9% |
| vs market, 6 months | over the past 6 months this stock lagged the market by 3.0 percentage points (the stock gained 8.1% while the market gained 11.1%) | -3.0% |
| vs market, 12 months | over the past 12 months this stock lagged the market by 22.1 percentage points (the stock lost 1.6% while the market gained 20.5%) | -22.1% |
Signal agreement
2
| Bullish technical signals | 4 of the 9 technical signals we can compute for it are currently in a bullish state: a "golden cross" — its 50-day average is above its 200-day, trading above its 200-day average, MACD momentum is positive, trading above the Ichimoku cloud — these describe past price behaviour, not a forecast | 4 of 9 |
|---|---|---|
| Bearish technical signals | 1 of the 9 technical signals we can compute for it is currently in a bearish state: lagging the market over 6 months — these describe past price behaviour, not a forecast | 1 of 9 |
Trend (Ichimoku cloud)
1
| Vs the Ichimoku cloud | trading 1.5% above the Ichimoku cloud — a band drawn from where its own highs and lows sat up to 2026-07-16 and projected forward over today's price, the side traders read as an established uptrend, with the band below acting as the level that would have to give way. The band itself is thin, spanning 0.4% of the share price, which is taken to mean a barrier that gives way easily. | +1.5% |
|---|
Volume-weighted price
2
| Vs this year’s average price paid | the price is 6% above the average price paid so far this year, so the typical buyer over that stretch is showing a gain. That average is $64.63 — a volume-weighted average of daily closes over 158 sessions, not a true tick-by-tick VWAP. | +5.7% |
|---|---|---|
| Vs the average paid since it last reported | the price is 1% above the average price paid since it last reported on 2026-07-29 (its 8-K), so the typical buyer over that stretch is showing a gain. That average is $67.43 — a volume-weighted average of daily closes over 18 sessions, not a true tick-by-tick VWAP. | +1.3% |
Price levels it has turned at before
MC last closed at $68.29 on 2026-08-21. Since 2024-08-21 it has turned at 6 prices below its last close and 6 above; the 3 nearest below and the 3 nearest above are listed, nearest first.
| Level | Side | Distance | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| $68.52 | Resistance | 0.3% above the last close | turned there five times · 2025-07-22 to 2026-02-03 |
| $65.95 | Support | 3.4% below the last close | turned there five times · 2024-10-10 to 2026-05-14 |
| $70.73 | Resistance | 3.6% above the last close | turned there 9 times · 2024-09-23 to 2026-08-13 |
| $64.16 | Support | 6.0% below the last close | turned there three times · 2025-03-26 to 2026-07-30 |
| $72.65 | Resistance | 6.4% above the last close | turned there six times · 2024-10-17 to 2026-07-07 |
| $62.91 | Support | 7.9% below the last close | turned there twice · 2025-10-10 to 2026-08-10 |
A level is a price this company reversed or paused at more than once — they describe past behaviour, not a forecast of where the price will go.
Wave structure
Its recent swings can be read as a three-part upward correction — the A-B-C shape chartists use for a pullback — now complete.
This labelling fails — stops being a possible reading at all — if it closes above $70.51.
It is the only labelling that fits these swings, though its proportions are not the textbook ones. It was chosen from 3 labellings that survived the rules, counting shorter readings of the same bars.
This labelling was already in place when we began recording count changes on 2026-08-13, so how long it has stood is not something we can say yet.
Read from daily closes as of 2026-08-21.
An Elliott-wave count describes the swings already printed and the level that would disprove it. It is not a forecast, a target, or advice.
Screens: Trading above the 200-day moving average · Tested and reclaimed 200-day support · MACD just crossed bullish (12/26/9) · in a Bollinger Band volatility squeeze · trendless / choppy (low ADX) · Near the golden pocket (has given back about two thirds of its 52-week move) | Learn: moving average · golden cross · adx · rsi · macd · breakout · bollinger bands
Based on daily closing prices as of 2026-08-21. Describes past price behavior only — informational, not financial advice.
Analyst consensus
- Consensus ratingHold (2.91 mean, 1=Strong Buy…5=Strong Sell) — 10 analysts
- Mean price target$72.00 range $60.00 – $86.00; median $71.50
Analyst estimates, as of 2026-08-22. These are third-party analyst opinions and price targets, aggregated — not a recommendation, prediction, or advice from stocks-llm. Informational only.
Analyst EPS estimate for MC
- Consensus EPS estimate$0.7568 next reporting period, as of 2026-08-22
Change over time is not available yet: it needs two readings of the same reporting period at least 30 days apart, and we have been recording these estimates since 2026-08-04. An estimate for a DIFFERENT quarter is not a revision, so a reading from before the last report is never compared with one after it.
The consensus estimate for the next reporting period, and how it has moved between readings of that SAME period. A change is measured only between readings estimating one period — when a company reports, the consensus moves to the next quarter and the two numbers are not comparable. Informational only, not a forecast and not advice.
Key risks (from latest filing)
["Dependence on the global M&A and corporate advisory environment, which is highly cyclical and sensitive to broader economic conditions.","The firm's success is heavily reliant on the retention and performance of its key professional personnel.","Potential for significant reputational risk if transactions or advisory services are perceived to be unsuccessful or involved in conflicts of interest."]
What changed in the latest 10-Q
AI-assisted comparison of MC's 10-Q filed 2026-04-30 against the prior one filed 2025-10-30.
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
- Added:
- Newer filing (2026-04-30) references Form 10-K for year ended December 31, 2025 instead of December 31, 2024
- Newer filing states 'As of March 31, 2026, we served our clients globally with 1,027 advisory bankers' vs older filing's 'As of September 30, 2025, we served our clients globally with 1,035 advisory bankers'
- Newer filing references M&A market data 'as of April 8, 2026 and April 7, 2025' vs older filing's 'as of October 6, 2025 and October 4, 2024'
- Newer filing discusses 'first three months of 2026' with revenues of $319.8 million vs 'first nine months of 2025' in older filing with revenues of $1,028.9 million
- Newer filing discusses 'Rapid technological change, particularly related to AI' driving strategic transactions
- Newer filing states 'Following substantial investment in 2025, our private capital advisory business has become a core pillar of our client offering'
- Newer filing cites 'recent geopolitical events, evolving conditions in the private credit market and AI-driven disruption' as potential impact factors
- Newer filing notes 'AI-driven disruption is weighing particularly on M&A sentiment within the software sector'
- Newer filing presents Q1 2026 vs Q1 2025 results table with revenues of $319,780K (2026) vs $306,593K (2025)
- Removed:
- Older filing discussion of 'nine months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024' is removed in newer filing which covers only three months ended March 31
- Older filing's discussion of 'near-record levels of capital accumulated by financial sponsors combined with unsold portfolio companies' is not in newer filing
- Older filing's reference to 'ample liquidity, access to diverse pools of capital and historically low credit spreads' is removed
- Older filing's discussion of 'impact of existing and any future tariff policy announcements and the recent U.S. government shut down' is not present in newer filing
- Older filing's nine-month results comparison table is removed (replaced with three-month comparison)
- Reworded:
- Older filing: 'Our new business origination and deal activity are strong' vs Newer filing: 'We continue to observe strong levels of deal activity and client engagement'
- Older filing: 'companies continue to use M&A and the capital markets as a tool to realize long-term strategic priorities' vs Newer filing: 'Rapid technological change, particularly related to AI, is driving companies to reevaluate their positioning'
- Older filing: 'While still in the early stages, we are encouraged by our recent investments in our private capital advisory business' vs Newer filing: 'Following substantial investment in 2025, our private capital advisory business has become a core pillar of our client offering'
- Older filing references 'traditional restructurings' as potential future activity vs Newer filing states restructuring activity is 'expected to support more traditional restructuring activity over time' due to 'recent market dislocation and evolving credit conditions'
- Notes:
- The two filings cover different reporting periods (Q1 2026 vs nine months 2025), so some differences reflect period-specific commentary rather than policy changes
- The newer filing text appears truncated at 'We earn subst' so full comparison of Revenues section is incomplete
- The older filing text also appears truncated in the Revenues section
Risk Factors
- Added:
- Newer filing (2026-04-30) covers three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025, compared to older filing (2025-10-30) covering three and nine months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024
- Newer filing shows financial statements as of March 31, 2026 and December 31, 2025; older filing shows as of September 30, 2025 and December 31, 2024
- Newer filing's cash flows statement covers only three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025; older filing covers nine months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024
- Newer filing includes 'Payments under tax receivable agreement' line item of ($32,206) thousand in investing activities; older filing shows this in financing activities at ($314) thousand for nine months
- Removed:
- Older filing's cash flow statement line item 'Gain on partial sale of equity method investment' ($19,092) and 'Proceeds from partial sale of equity method investment' ($29,916) are not present in newer filing
- Older filing shows 'Dividends received' ($2,347) in operating activities; newer filing shows 'Dividends received from equity method investment' ($1,336)
- Older filing cash flows cover nine-month periods; newer filing covers three-month periods only
- Reworded:
- Newer filing (2026-04-30) refers to 'Note payments (issued to) employees' and 'Note payments received from employees' as separate line items; older filing (2025-10-30) combined as 'Note payments received from (issued to) employees'
- Newer filing lists 'Dividends received from equity method investment'; older filing lists 'Dividends received'
- Notes:
- The two filings represent different fiscal periods (Q1 2026 versus Q3 2025), which naturally results in different financial statement periods and metrics
- The newer filing presents only three-month period comparisons while the older filing presents both three- and nine-month comparisons, making direct reconciliation of cash flow items less straightforward
- All numerical comparisons are affected by different reporting periods and cannot be directly compared without adjustment
AI-assisted comparison of two SEC filing sections. It describes wording and theme changes only, makes no materiality, legal, or investment judgement, and is not financial advice. Informational only — not financial advice.
Insider activity (SEC Form 4)
0 open-market purchases and 1 open-market sale by insiders in the last 90 days.
- Last 30 days0 buys · 1 sell ($336105) — 1 selling insider
- Last 90 days0 buys · 1 sell ($336105) — 1 selling insider
- Last 180 days0 buys · 1 sell ($336105) — 1 selling insider
Activity heuristic: net selling (a transparent product heuristic from the counts above, not a prediction or advice)
Most recent open-market transaction: 2026-08-04. As of 2026-08-24.
View full insider trading history → View SEC Form 3/4/5 filingsAsk about MC's insider activity →
Only open-market purchases (SEC code P) and sales (code S) are counted here. Option exercises, vesting/awards, gifts, and shares withheld for taxes are excluded — they are compensation or mechanical, not open-market conviction. Sales may be planned and non-discretionary (e.g. a Rule 10b5-1 plan) and are not necessarily bearish; open-market buying is not a recommendation to buy. Informational only — not financial advice.
Institutional ownership (13F)
5 institutional 13F filers reported holding MC as of 2026-03-31 (quarter-end position, filed within 45 days).
- Distinct 13F filers 5
- Reported shares held 12,156,891
- Reported value $692,942,846
reported quarterly holdings change (2025-12-31 → 2026-03-31): 0 new, 2 increased, 3 decreased, 0 exited. Change counts cover only managers that filed 13F reports in BOTH quarters, derived between two quarter-end snapshots — not same-day trades; a single manager is never said to have "bought" or "sold".
Institutional holdings are quarter-end long positions reported on SEC Form 13F-HR, filed up to 45 days after the quarter ends — they are delayed, are not real-time trades, exclude short positions and most non-US securities, and are not investment advice. Any increase/decrease is a reported change between two quarterly snapshots, not a same-day purchase or sale. These are quarter-end snapshots from the 13F filings on SEC EDGAR, filed within 45 days — not real-time, and any change is a difference between two quarterly reports, not a same-day trade. Informational only — not financial advice.
Short interest (FINRA)
MC had 4,433,822 shares of reported short interest as of the 2026-07-31 FINRA settlement date (delayed, bi-monthly; not real-time).
Short interest as a percent of shares outstanding is not shown for MC because we do not hold a verified share count to divide it by. The reported figures above are unaffected.
- Reported short interest (shares) 4,433,822
- Prior settlement (shares) 4,363,389
- Reported change 1.61%
- Days to cover (reported) 4.18
Reported to FINRA as of the 2026-07-31 settlement date. Short interest is reported to FINRA and published on a delayed, bi-monthly schedule (as of a settlement date, disseminated roughly eight business days later) — it is NOT real-time, does not cover every venue or all US trading, and is not a short-squeeze prediction or investment advice. Days-to-cover is the value FINRA reports; percent of float is not shown because the source file carries no share-count denominator — where a percent appears it is of shares OUTSTANDING, the larger base, and is therefore a floor on percent of float. Informational only — not financial advice.
Competitors & peers
- Evercore (EVR)
- Lazard (LAZ)
- Houlihan Lokey (HLI)
- Perella Weinberg Partners (PWP)
- Greenhill & Co. (now part of Mizuho)
- Centerview Partners
- PJT Partners (PJT)
AI-enriched competitor set. Linked names are companies covered by stocks-llm; other named peers are shown for reference only.
Compare MC vs…
MC ranks in…
Frequently asked questions
What does MOELIS CLASS A (MC) do?
Moelis & Company is an independent investment bank that provides financial advisory services to a diverse client base, including corporations, financial sponsors, governments, and boards of directors. The firm specializes in strategic advisory services, such as mergers and acquisitions, capital structure advisory, and financial restructuring. Moelis operates globally, offering expertise across various industries to help clients execute complex financial and strategic transactions.
What sector is MOELIS CLASS A (MC) in?
MOELIS CLASS A (MC) is classified in the Financials sector. Its industry is Investment Banking & Brokerage. It trades on NYSE.
Does MC pay a dividend?
Yes — MOELIS CLASS A (MC) pays a dividend, with an indicated yield of about 5.34% (market data, as of 2026-08-24). Informational only — not financial advice.
Who are MOELIS CLASS A's (MC) competitors?
Notable peers of MOELIS CLASS A (MC) include Evercore, Lazard, Houlihan Lokey, Perella Weinberg Partners and Greenhill & Co. (now part of Mizuho). This peer set is informational only — not financial advice.
Is MOELIS CLASS A (MC) overbought or oversold right now?
MOELIS CLASS A (MC) is currently neither overbought nor oversold — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 52, in the neutral middle (as of 2026-08-21). RSI describes recent price momentum, not a forecast — informational only, not financial advice.
Where does stocks-llm's data on MC come from?
Fundamentals and prices come from market data, as of 2026-08-24; company filings and profile facts come from SEC EDGAR. All figures are delayed daily-close data shown with their as-of date — informational only, not financial advice.
Fundamentals: market data, as of 2026-08-24. Filings: SEC EDGAR. Prices are delayed daily-close data.
Last updated 2026-08-21.
Informational only — NOT financial advice. All figures are delayed daily-close data from SEC EDGAR & market data, shown with their as-of date.