Mondelez International (MDLZ)
Consumer Staples · packaged foods · NASDAQ
Mondelēz International is a global snacking powerhouse home to iconic brands like Oreo, Ritz, and Cadbury, operating in the highly resilient consumer staples sector.
What Mondelez International does
Mondelēz International is a global leader in snacking, focused on the manufacturing and marketing of biscuits, chocolate, gum, and candy. The company operates a portfolio of iconic brands, selling its products to consumers in approximately 150 countries.
Themes: global snacking, branded consumer goods, confectionery
Fundamentals
- Price$60.67 as of 2026-10-08 close
- Market cap$77.9B as of 2026-04-24 (share count; price 2026-10-08)
- 1-year return-1.6% 2025-10-08 close $61.66 → 2026-10-08 close $60.67
- P/E22.25 as of 2026-10-08
- Net margin+6.4% FY2025, SEC XBRL
- Gross margin+28.4% FY2025, SEC XBRL
- ROE+9.5% FY2025, SEC XBRL
- Debt / equity0.81 as of 2026-09-03
- Revenue growth (YoY)+6.9% as of 2026-09-03
- Revenue CAGR (3y)+7.0% SEC XBRL
- Beta0.00 as of 2026-09-03
- Last reported earnings2026-07-28 SEC EDGAR Form 8-K (Item 2.02)
Dividend: yield +3.3%; at least 4 years of non-decreasing per-share dividends (SEC XBRL) — we do not hold the year before it, so the real streak may be longer.
How MDLZ compares in its sector
- price-to-earnings ratiomiddle range 91 covered Consumer Staples peers, as of 2026-10-08
- net profit marginmiddle range 105 covered Consumer Staples peers, as of 2026-09-03
- operating marginmiddle range 98 covered Consumer Staples peers, as of 2026-09-03
- gross marginmiddle range 93 covered Consumer Staples peers, as of 2026-09-03
- return on equitymiddle range 106 covered Consumer Staples peers, as of 2026-09-03
- 3-year revenue CAGRtop 25% 109 covered Consumer Staples peers
- indicated dividend yieldmiddle range 77 covered Consumer Staples peers, as of 2026-09-03
- free cash flow (absolute dollars, latest fiscal year)top 10% 110 covered Consumer Staples peers, as of FY2025
Position among covered Consumer Staples companies that report each metric (minimum 5 peers). A relative position within our covered catalog — not a valuation, quality, or investment judgment. A higher percentile is simply a higher value (for P/E, more expensive on earnings — never "better"). Informational only.
Top 10 scores & list membership
MDLZ is not currently in any published Top 10 list. Its scores are below.
Top 10 score
50.9 #675 of 1,379 scored · #15 of 65 in Consumer Staples
Capital return 69th (net share count bought back over the year 3.6, consecutive years of dividend increases 4 years) and trend 63rd (it is 9.0% below its highest point of the past year); weakest is financial health (42nd, debt to equity 0.8, free cash flow margin 8.4%).
Scores as of 8 Oct 2026. Each bar is a percentile: how this company ranked against every company the score ranked, 0–100. A list is a published formula and its output, not a recommendation. Method version 4.
Dividend coverage (FY2025)
Exceeded at least one reported measure. In FY2025, MDLZ's dividend exceeded at least one reported measure of what it earned or generated (earnings payout 101%, free-cash-flow payout 77%). A payout above 100% in one year is not necessarily unsustainable, but it is not fully covered by that measure.
- Earnings payout101% dividends / net income
- Free-cash-flow payout77% dividends / (operating cash flow − capex)
Coverage derived from reported SEC EDGAR XBRL figures for FY2025 (dividends paid vs. net income and free cash flow, same fiscal year). This describes PAST coverage for one fiscal year — it does not predict whether a dividend will be maintained, raised, or cut, and a one-year payout ratio can be distorted by non-recurring items. Informational only — not financial advice.
How Mondelez International looks technically
Mondelez International (MDLZ) is trading 1.8% above its 200-day average, the long-term trend line — a longer-term uptrend. Its 50-day average crossed above its 200-day average about 92 trading days ago — a "golden cross", a bullish long-term signal. There is no clear trend right now — the price is choppy (ADX, a 0–100 trend-strength gauge, is 12, below the 25 that marks a real trend). Momentum is neutral — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 51, neither overbought (above 70) nor oversold (below 30). MACD, a trend-momentum gauge, turned bullish about 1 trading day ago (its momentum flipped positive). It made a new 20-day low about 6 trading days ago.
Trend
9
| Distance from the 200-day | it is trading 1.8% above its 200-day average, the long-term trend line — a longer-term uptrend | +1.8% |
|---|---|---|
| 50-day moving average | its average price over the last 50 trading days — a short-term trend line — is $61.71 | $61.71 |
| 200-day moving average | its average price over the last 200 trading days — the long-term trend line — is $59.58 | $59.58 |
| Swing structure | each recent peak has been lower than the one before it and each dip deeper — the pattern chart-watchers call a downtrend, which describes where price has already been and not where it goes next | lower highs and lower lows |
| Last swing turn | its last significant turn was a swing high 24 calendar days ago — the swings before that are what the structure reading is measured on | 24 sessions |
| Wave structure | its recent swings can be read as a five-part downward sequence — what Elliott-wave chartists call an impulse — now in leg 3 of five; the labelling fails if price closes above 63.83. It is one of several labellings that fit, and it describes the swings already printed, not what comes next. The same swings also read as a three-part correction in leg C. | possible downward five-wave sequence, in wave 3 (one of several readings) |
| Since the 50/200 cross | its 50-day average crossed above its 200-day average about 92 trading days ago — a "golden cross", a bullish long-term signal | 92 sessions |
| Above the 200-day after a dip | it recently dipped to its 200-day average (the long-term trend line) and has since climbed back above it — now about 1.8% above | +1.8% |
| Trend strength (14-day ADX) | there is no clear trend right now — the price is choppy (ADX, a 0–100 trend-strength gauge, is 12, below the 25 that marks a real trend) | 12.2 |
Momentum
3
| 14-day RSI | momentum is neutral — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 51, neither overbought (above 70) nor oversold (below 30) | 51.3 |
|---|---|---|
| Position in its 14-day range | it is trading in the upper half of its 14-day range ($57.32 to $62.19) — its "stochastic" reading is 69 out of 100, where 0 would mean closing exactly at the 14-session low and 100 exactly at the high. This measures WHERE the price sits inside its recent range, which is a different question from the RSI beside it: RSI is a momentum gauge, measuring how FAST the price has been moving, so a stock can drift quietly to the bottom of its range with an ordinary RSI, or fall sharply and still sit in the middle. It has been climbing within that range over the last few sessions. | 68.8 |
| Since the MACD crossed zero | MACD, a trend-momentum gauge, turned bullish about 1 trading day ago (its momentum flipped positive) | 1 session |
Range
12
| 52-week high | its highest closing price over the past year (about 252 trading days) was $66.65 | $66.65 |
|---|---|---|
| From the 52-week high | it is 9.0% below its 52-week high (its highest price of the past year) | -9.0% |
| Above the 52-week low | it is 18.5% above its 52-week low (its lowest price of the past year) | +18.5% |
| Below the 52-week high | it is 9.0% below its highest point of the past year | 9.0% |
| Since a 20-day breakout | it made a new 20-day low about 6 trading days ago | 6 sessions |
| Since a 55-day breakout | it made a new 55-day low about 6 trading days ago | 6 sessions |
| All-time high | its highest closing price on record is $78.59 (set on 2023-04-28) | $78.59 |
| Given back of the 52-week move | over the past year its closes ranged ($51.51 to $64.99), and it has given back roughly a third of its rise from last year’s low — 32% of it. Chart-watchers call 61.8%-65% given back the "golden pocket" — for this company that is $56.23 to $56.66. It is watched widely enough that orders cluster there, which is the honest reason it matters; it is not a forecast. | 32.0% |
| From the all-time high | it is 22.8% below its all-time high | -22.8% |
| Nearest price level | it is trading 1.3% above a support level at $59.86 — a price it turned at 15 times since 2024-12-09, most recently on 2026-09-08. Since 2024-10-08 it has 4 such levels below the current price and 6 above. Levels like these describe where the price has reversed or paused before; they are not a forecast of where it will go. | -1.3% |
| All-time low | its lowest closing price on record is $20.81 (set on 2009-03-05) | $20.81 |
| Above the all-time low | it is 191.5% above its all-time low | +191.5% |
Volatility
5
| Band width vs its own 6 months | day-to-day price swings are unusually wide versus its own recent history (wider than about 80% of the past ~6 months) | 80th percentile |
|---|---|---|
| Typical daily range | in a typical session it travels about $1.19 between its high and its low — about 2.0% of its price. That is its "average true range" over the last 14 sessions, which also counts the distance from the previous close, so a day that opens well away from yesterday counts as the large move it was | $1.19 |
| Bollinger bands (20-day, ±2σ) | most of its recent trading has stayed between about $57.38 and $63.36 — the "Bollinger bands", a range drawn two standard deviations either side of its 20-day average price, which widens when the stock gets more volatile and narrows when it settles | $57.38 – $60.37 – $63.36 |
| Typical daily range (% of price) | its price moves about 2.0% in a typical session — among the calmest in the catalog. This is the average gap between a session's high and low over the last 14 sessions, counting overnight moves, expressed against the current price so it can be compared with companies trading at any price | 2.0% |
| Stretch from the 200-day average | it is trading 0.9 daily ranges above its 200-day average price (1.8% above it in plain percentage terms) — a way of asking how far it has stretched from its own average in units of how far it normally moves in a day, so a calm company and a jumpy one can be compared on the same scale | 0.9 daily ranges above its 200-day average |
Volume
1
| Volume vs its 30-day average | trading volume is about normal versus its 30-day average | 0.97× |
|---|
Analyst
2
| Change in the average price target | analysts have raised their average price target by 0.1% since the prior reading | +0.1% |
|---|---|---|
| Change in the consensus rating | the analyst consensus rating has improved toward "buy" since the prior reading | 0.09 toward buy |
Candlestick patterns
2
| Since a doji | 8 sessions ago it opened and closed at almost the same price after trading through a wider range — a "doji", the classic picture of buyers and sellers finishing the session level | 8 sessions ago |
|---|---|---|
| Since a bullish engulfing | 4 sessions ago it opened below the previous session's close and finished above that session's open — a "bullish engulfing" pair, where one up day more than undid the down day before it | 4 sessions ago |
Price gaps
2
| Gap at the open | it opened on 2026-10-08 0.8% above the previous session's close — an overnight gap, the part of the move that happened while the market was shut, and had not traded back through that level by the close | +0.8% |
|---|---|---|
| Gap filled | a 2.3% gap down opened on 2026-09-29 has been "filled" today — price traded back through the level the gap left behind, and it took 7 sessions to close | today |
Price streaks
1
| Closing streak | it closed higher in its latest session, after a session that did not close higher — a single up day rather than a run | 1 session up |
|---|
Relative strength
4
| vs market, 1 month | over the past 1 month this stock lagged the market by 2.6 percentage points (the stock lost 1.6% while the market gained 1.0%) | -2.6% |
|---|---|---|
| vs market, 3 months | over the past 3 months this stock lagged the market by 1.8 percentage points (the stock gained 2.0% while the market gained 3.8%) | -1.8% |
| vs market, 6 months | over the past 6 months this stock lagged the market by 13.5 percentage points (the stock gained 3.9% while the market gained 17.5%) | -13.5% |
| vs market, 12 months | over the past 12 months this stock lagged the market by 16.6 percentage points (the stock lost 1.6% while the market gained 15.0%) | -16.6% |
Signal agreement
2
| Bullish technical signals | 3 of the 9 technical signals we can compute for it are currently in a bullish state: a "golden cross" — its 50-day average is above its 200-day, trading above its 200-day average, MACD momentum is positive — these describe past price behaviour, not a forecast | 3 of 9 |
|---|---|---|
| Bearish technical signals | 2 of the 9 technical signals we can compute for it are currently in a bearish state: lagging the market over 6 months, trading below the Ichimoku cloud — these describe past price behaviour, not a forecast | 2 of 9 |
Trend (Ichimoku cloud)
1
| Vs the Ichimoku cloud | trading 2.5% below the Ichimoku cloud — a band drawn from where its own highs and lows sat up to 2026-09-01 and projected forward over today's price, the side traders read as an established downtrend, with the band above acting as the level that would have to be cleared. The band itself is moderate, spanning 2.2% of the share price. | -2.5% |
|---|
Volume-weighted price
2
| Vs this year’s average price paid | the price is 2% above the average price paid so far this year, so the typical buyer over that stretch is showing a gain. That average is $59.61 — a volume-weighted average of daily closes over 190 sessions, not a true tick-by-tick VWAP. | +1.8% |
|---|---|---|
| Vs the average paid since it last reported | the price is 2% below the average price paid since it last reported on 2026-07-28 (its 10-Q), so the typical buyer over that stretch is under water. That average is $61.79 — a volume-weighted average of daily closes over 52 sessions, not a true tick-by-tick VWAP. | -1.8% |
Price levels it has turned at before
MDLZ last closed at $60.67 on 2026-10-08. Since 2024-10-08 it has turned at 4 prices below its last close and 6 above; the 3 nearest below and the 3 nearest above are listed, nearest first.
| Level | Side | Distance | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| $59.86 | Support | 1.3% below the last close | turned there 15 times · 2024-12-09 to 2026-09-08 |
| $61.49 | Resistance | 1.4% above the last close | turned there twice · 2025-09-29 to 2026-02-27 |
| $63.28 | Resistance | 4.3% above the last close | turned there 11 times · 2024-11-19 to 2026-09-14 |
| $57.65 | Support | 5.0% below the last close | turned there five times · 2025-11-28 to 2026-07-10 |
| $65.25 | Resistance | 7.5% above the last close | turned there 8 times · 2024-11-27 to 2026-08-24 |
| $55.46 | Support | 8.6% below the last close | turned there six times · 2025-01-13 to 2026-04-22 |
A level is a price this company reversed or paused at more than once — they describe past behaviour, not a forecast of where the price will go.
Wave structure
Its recent swings can be read as a five-part downward sequence — what Elliott-wave chartists call an impulse — now in leg 3 of five.
This labelling fails — stops being a possible reading at all — if it closes above $63.83.
This is one of several labellings that fit the same swings, so treat it as a reading rather than the reading. It was chosen from 2 labellings that survived the rules, counting shorter readings of the same bars.
On past moves of this shape the leg has usually ended somewhere between $55.62 and $58.76 — that is where it has tended to end if the count holds, not a forecast of where the price goes.
Alternate reading: The same swings also read as a three-part correction in leg C, which fails on a close above $63.83.
This reading has stood for 14 trading days, since 2026-09-21.
Read from daily closes as of 2026-10-08.
An Elliott-wave count describes the swings already printed and the level that would disprove it. It is not a forecast, a target, or advice.
Screens: Near 200-day moving-average support · Trading above the 200-day moving average · MACD just crossed bullish (12/26/9) · trendless / choppy (low ADX) · lagging the market · Least volatile (2% or less typical daily range) | Learn: moving average · golden cross · adx · rsi · macd · breakout
Based on daily closing prices as of 2026-10-08. Describes past price behavior only — informational, not financial advice.
Analyst consensus
- Consensus ratingBuy (1.87 mean, 1=Strong Buy…5=Strong Sell) — 22 analysts
- Mean price target$69.23 range $55.00 – $77.00; median $70.00
Analyst estimates, as of 2026-10-03. These are third-party analyst opinions and price targets, aggregated — not a recommendation, prediction, or advice from stocks-llm. Informational only.
Analyst EPS estimate for MDLZ
- Consensus EPS estimate$0.7138 next reporting period, as of 2026-10-03
- Estimate change, 30 days-$0.00588 (-0.8%) from $0.7197, on 2026-08-29, 35-day window
- Readings revised upward0% of 8 comparable readings
The consensus estimate for the next reporting period, and how it has moved between readings of that SAME period. A change is measured only between readings estimating one period — when a company reports, the consensus moves to the next quarter and the two numbers are not comparable. Informational only, not a forecast and not advice.
Key risks (from latest filing)
["Exposure to fluctuations in commodity prices, particularly cocoa, sugar, and dairy.","Risks related to international operations including currency exchange rate fluctuations and geopolitical instability.","Reliance on the performance of a portfolio of global snack brands in a highly competitive market."]
What changed in the latest 10-Q
AI-assisted comparison of MDLZ's 10-Q filed 2026-04-28 against the prior one filed 2025-10-28.
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
- Added:
- Added disclosure of U.S. Supreme Court ruling in first quarter 2026 that tariffs under IEEPA were unlawful, with approximately $20 million paid in tariffs and uncertain refund timing (filed 2026-04-28)
- Added new section 'Developments in the Middle East' describing February 28, 2026 military strikes by U.S. and Israel on Iran, production stoppage and reduced capacity at Bahrain facility, shipping disruptions, increased shipping costs, and that Middle Eastern countries generated approximately 1.0% of consolidated net revenue in Q1 2026 (filed 2026-04-28)
- Added statement that cocoa prices are lower compared to prior year but expected to remain elevated compared to historical levels (filed 2026-04-28)
- Removed:
- Removed reference to 'cheese & grocery and powdered beverages' from core business categories; replaced with 'meals and beverages' (filed 2026-04-28)
- Removed 'significantly higher' qualifier before operating costs language (filed 2026-04-28)
- Removed specific language about expecting cocoa costs to be lower in 2026 compared to current year (filed 2025-10-28)
- Removed prior year revenue comparison showing Ukraine at 0.4% and Russia at 3.7% for Q3 2025 and Russia at 2.9% for Q3 2024 (filed 2025-10-28)
- Removed statement that Russian business profitability and assets 'continue to remain above historic levels' (filed 2025-10-28)
- Removed entire Middle East conflict section describing October 2023 Hamas-Israel conflict with limited 2024-2025 impacts (filed 2025-10-28)
- Removed reference to 'Items Affecting Comparability of Financial Results' regarding Ukraine facilities damage (filed 2025-10-28)
- Removed tariff language about 'provisions of certain proposed tariffs for which implementation is currently delayed' (filed 2025-10-28)
- Reworded:
- Changed War in Ukraine section to state Russia generated 3.1% of consolidated net revenue during Q1 2026, compared to prior filing's statement that Q3 2025 showed 3.7% (filed 2026-04-28)
- Changed reference from 'Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024' to 'Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025' in Trade and Regulatory Uncertainty section (filed 2026-04-28)
- Changed tariff discussion from discussing 'delayed' tariff provisions to discussing 'U.S. Supreme Court ruled that tariffs imposed under IEEPA were unlawful' and that 'U.S. administration has continued to impose new tariffs under other provisions' (filed 2026-04-28)
- Notes:
- The older filing text appears truncated at the end of the Extreme Price Growth in Argentina section, limiting full comparison of that section
- The newer filing text also appears truncated at the beginning of Extreme Price Growth in Argentina section
AI-assisted comparison of two SEC filing sections. It describes wording and theme changes only, makes no materiality, legal, or investment judgement, and is not financial advice. Informational only — not financial advice.
Insider activity (SEC Form 4)
0 open-market purchases and 1 open-market sale by insiders in the last 90 days, of which we have read Form 4 filings through 2026-10-04. The 5 days since 2026-10-04 have not been checked yet.
- Last 90 days · read to 2026-10-040 buys · 1 sell ($9M) — 1 selling insider
- Last 180 days · read to 2026-10-040 buys · 3 sells ($9M) — 2 selling insiders
Activity heuristic: net selling (a transparent product heuristic from the counts above, not a prediction or advice)
Most recent open-market transaction: 2026-08-19. Based on Form 4 filings read through 2026-10-04; anything filed since is not yet included.
View full insider trading history → View SEC Form 3/4/5 filingsAsk about MDLZ's insider activity →
Only open-market purchases (SEC code P) and sales (code S) are counted here. Option exercises, vesting/awards, gifts, and shares withheld for taxes are excluded — they are compensation or mechanical, not open-market conviction. Sales may be planned and non-discretionary (e.g. a Rule 10b5-1 plan) and are not necessarily bearish; open-market buying is not a recommendation to buy. Informational only — not financial advice.
U.S. House trading disclosures
U.S. House members publicly disclose their own, their spouse's, and dependent children's stock transactions under the STOCK Act. We hold 17 matched disclosures for MDLZ from U.S. House Clerk Periodic Transaction Report filings.
U.S. House trading disclosures →Institutional ownership (13F)
5 institutional 13F filers reported holding MDLZ as of 2026-06-30 (quarter-end position, filed within 45 days).
- Distinct 13F filers 5
- Reported shares held 207,952,502
- Reported value $12,057,419,991
reported quarterly holdings change (2026-03-31 → 2026-06-30): 0 new, 3 increased, 2 decreased, 0 exited. Change counts cover only managers that filed 13F reports in BOTH quarters, derived between two quarter-end snapshots — not same-day trades; a single manager is never said to have "bought" or "sold".
Institutional holdings are quarter-end long positions reported on SEC Form 13F-HR, filed up to 45 days after the quarter ends — they are delayed, are not real-time trades, exclude short positions and most non-US securities, and are not investment advice. Any increase/decrease is a reported change between two quarterly snapshots, not a same-day purchase or sale. These are quarter-end snapshots from the 13F filings on SEC EDGAR, filed within 45 days — not real-time, and any change is a difference between two quarterly reports, not a same-day trade. Informational only — not financial advice.
Ask about MDLZ's institutional holders → See what each manager we track holds →
Short interest (FINRA)
MDLZ had 27,856,688 shares of reported short interest as of the 2026-09-15 FINRA settlement date (delayed, bi-monthly; not real-time).
MDLZ had 2.17% of its shares outstanding sold short as of the 2026-09-15 FINRA settlement date (percent of FLOAT would be higher — float is not disclosed in the source). FINRA reported 3.86 days to cover at the same settlement.
- Reported short interest (shares) 27,856,688
- Short interest (% of shares outstanding) 2.17%
- Prior settlement (shares) 32,200,588
- Reported change -13.49%
- Days to cover (reported) 3.86
Reported to FINRA as of the 2026-09-15 settlement date. Short interest is reported to FINRA and published on a delayed, bi-monthly schedule (as of a settlement date, disseminated roughly eight business days later) — it is NOT real-time, does not cover every venue or all US trading, and is not a short-squeeze prediction or investment advice. Days-to-cover is the value FINRA reports; percent of float is not shown because the source file carries no share-count denominator — where a percent appears it is of shares OUTSTANDING, the larger base, and is therefore a floor on percent of float. Informational only — not financial advice.
Competitors & peers
- Hershey (HSY)
- Nestlé (NSRGY)
- PepsiCo (PEP)
- Ferrero Group
- Mars, Incorporated
AI-enriched competitor set. Linked names are companies covered by stocks-llm; other named peers are shown for reference only.
Compare MDLZ vs…
Mondelez International is found in…
Frequently asked questions
What does Mondelez International (MDLZ) do?
Mondelēz International is a global leader in snacking, focused on the manufacturing and marketing of biscuits, chocolate, gum, and candy. The company operates a portfolio of iconic brands, selling its products to consumers in approximately 150 countries.
What sector is Mondelez International (MDLZ) in?
Mondelez International (MDLZ) is classified in the Consumer Staples sector. Its industry is packaged foods. It trades on NASDAQ.
Does MDLZ pay a dividend?
Yes — Mondelez International (MDLZ) pays a dividend, with an indicated yield of about 3.29% and at least 4 years of non-decreasing per-share dividends (SEC EDGAR XBRL) — we do not hold the year before it, so the real streak may be longer (market data, as of 2026-09-03). Informational only — not financial advice.
Who are Mondelez International's (MDLZ) competitors?
Notable peers of Mondelez International (MDLZ) include Hershey, Nestlé, PepsiCo, Ferrero Group and Mars, Incorporated. This peer set is informational only — not financial advice.
Has there been recent U.S. House stock trading in MDLZ?
Yes — we hold 17 matched STOCK Act disclosures for MDLZ from U.S. House Clerk Periodic Transaction Report filings. These are legally-required disclosures (often filed 30–45 days after the trade), may belong to a U.S. House member, their spouse, or a dependent child, and are not an indicator of company performance or investment advice.
Is Mondelez International (MDLZ) overbought or oversold right now?
Mondelez International (MDLZ) is currently neither overbought nor oversold — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 51, in the neutral middle (as of 2026-10-08). RSI describes recent price momentum, not a forecast — informational only, not financial advice.
Where does stocks-llm's data on MDLZ come from?
Fundamentals come from SEC XBRL company filings for the figures marked with a fiscal year, and market data, as of 2026-09-03 for the rest; prices are market data, as of 2026-09-03; company filings and profile facts come from SEC EDGAR. All figures are delayed daily-close data shown with their as-of date — informational only, not financial advice.
Fundamentals: SEC XBRL company filings for the figures marked with a fiscal year, and market data, as of 2026-09-03 for the rest. Filings: SEC EDGAR. Prices are delayed daily-close data.
Last updated 2026-10-08.
Informational only — NOT financial advice. All figures are delayed daily-close data from SEC EDGAR & market data, shown with their as-of date.