Skip to content

MagnaChip Semiconductor Corp (MX)

Information Technology · Power and Display Semiconductors · NYSE

MagnaChip provides specialized analog and mixed-signal semiconductor solutions, primarily focusing on power management and display driver technology for various electronic applications.

What MagnaChip Semiconductor Corp does

MagnaChip Semiconductor Corporation is a designer and manufacturer of analog and mixed-signal semiconductor platform solutions for communications, IoT, consumer, and industrial applications. The company specializes in power solutions and display solutions, providing products such as power ICs and display driver integrated circuits (DDICs). Its business model integrates internal manufacturing capabilities for specific processes with outsourced semiconductor assembly and testing services.

Themes: power management, display technology, analog semiconductors, IoT infrastructure, consumer electronics, ]}-0.5638202026854181;24.269075765961637

Fundamentals

  • Price$3.26 as of 2026-08-26 close
  • Market cap$119M as of 2026-08-26
  • 1-year return+13.2% 2025-08-26 close $2.88 → 2026-08-26 close $3.26
  • P/En/a negative earnings
  • Net margin-17.3% as of 2026-08-26
  • Gross margin+15.9% as of 2026-08-26
  • ROE-12.7% as of 2026-08-26
  • Debt / equity0.18 as of 2026-08-26
  • Revenue growth (YoY)-20.0% as of 2026-08-26
  • Revenue CAGR (3y)-19.1% SEC XBRL
  • Beta1.75 as of 2026-08-26
  • Last reported earnings2026-07-29 SEC EDGAR Form 8-K (Item 2.02)

Ask why MX looks like this →

How MX compares in its sector

  • net profit marginbottom 25% 405 covered Information Technology peers, as of 2026-08-26
  • operating marginbottom 25% 405 covered Information Technology peers, as of 2026-08-26
  • gross marginbottom 10% 403 covered Information Technology peers, as of 2026-08-26
  • return on equitybottom 25% 405 covered Information Technology peers, as of 2026-08-26
  • 3-year revenue CAGRbottom 10% 386 covered Information Technology peers
  • free cash flow (absolute dollars, latest fiscal year)bottom 25% 382 covered Information Technology peers, as of FY2025

Position among covered Information Technology companies that report each metric (minimum 5 peers). A relative position within our covered catalog — not a valuation, quality, or investment judgment. A higher percentile is simply a higher value (for P/E, more expensive on earnings — never "better"). Informational only.

Ask how MX stacks up against peers →

Dividend coverage

Not assessed — last reported dividend predates the accounts. The most recent fiscal year in which MX reported a dividend payment is FY2010, while its reported financial statements run through FY2025. Coverage is therefore not assessed for the latest year — an FY2010 ratio would not describe MX today.

Coverage is derived from reported SEC EDGAR XBRL figures, comparing dividends paid against net income and free cash flow for the SAME fiscal year. It is not shown here because the latest fiscal year with a reported dividend payment (FY2010) is older than the latest year of reported financial statements (FY2025), so any ratio would describe an out-of-date year. Informational only — not financial advice.

Ask whether MX's dividend is covered →

How MagnaChip Semiconductor Corp looks technically

MagnaChip Semiconductor Corp (MX) is trading 7.5% below its 200-day average, the long-term trend line — a long-term downtrend. Its 50-day average crossed above its 200-day average about 82 trading days ago — a "golden cross", a bullish long-term signal. There is no clear trend right now — the price is choppy (ADX, a 0–100 trend-strength gauge, is 15, below the 25 that marks a real trend). Momentum is neutral — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 40, neither overbought (above 70) nor oversold (below 30). MACD, a trend-momentum gauge, turned bearish about 3 trading days ago (its momentum flipped negative). It made a new 20-day low about 21 trading days ago. It is 66.9% below its highest point of the past year. Trading volume is unusually light — only about 38% of its 30-day average.

Trend

7
Distance from the 200-dayit is trading 7.5% below its 200-day average, the long-term trend line — a long-term downtrend-7.5%
50-day moving averageits average price over the last 50 trading days — a short-term trend line — is $3.93$3.93
200-day moving averageits average price over the last 200 trading days — the long-term trend line — is $3.53$3.53
Swing structureits recent peaks and dips disagree — one of them is rising while the other is not, so there is no clean up or down pattern in the swingsmixed — one of the two is not confirming
Last swing turnits last significant turn was a swing high 19 calendar days ago — the swings before that are what the structure reading is measured on19 sessions
Since the 50/200 crossits 50-day average crossed above its 200-day average about 82 trading days ago — a "golden cross", a bullish long-term signal82 sessions
Trend strength (14-day ADX)there is no clear trend right now — the price is choppy (ADX, a 0–100 trend-strength gauge, is 15, below the 25 that marks a real trend)14.5

Momentum

3
14-day RSImomentum is neutral — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 40, neither overbought (above 70) nor oversold (below 30)40.3
Position in its 14-day rangeit is trading near the bottom of its 14-day range ($3.13 to $4.10) — its "stochastic" reading is 13 out of 100, where 0 would mean closing exactly at the 14-session low and 100 exactly at the high. This measures WHERE the price sits inside its recent range, which is a different question from the RSI beside it: RSI is a momentum gauge, measuring how FAST the price has been moving, so a stock can drift quietly to the bottom of its range with an ordinary RSI, or fall sharply and still sit in the middle. It has been climbing within that range over the last few sessions.13.4
Since the MACD crossed zeroMACD, a trend-momentum gauge, turned bearish about 3 trading days ago (its momentum flipped negative)3 sessions

Range

12
52-week highits highest closing price over the past year (about 252 trading days) was $9.86$9.86
From the 52-week highit is 66.9% below its 52-week high (its highest price of the past year)-66.9%
Above the 52-week lowit is 49.2% above its 52-week low (its lowest price of the past year)+49.2%
Below the 52-week highit is 66.9% below its highest point of the past year66.9%
Since a 20-day breakoutit made a new 20-day low about 21 trading days ago21 sessions
Since a 55-day breakoutit made a new 55-day low about 21 trading days ago21 sessions
All-time highits highest closing price on record is $26.98 (set on 2021-04-05)$26.98
Given back of the 52-week moveover the past year its closes ranged ($2.27 to $8.93), and it has given back almost all of its rise from last year’s low — 85% of it. Chart-watchers call 61.8%-65% given back the "golden pocket" — for this company that is $4.60 to $4.81. It is watched widely enough that orders cluster there, which is the honest reason it matters; it is not a forecast.85.1%
From the all-time highit is 87.9% below its all-time high-87.9%
Nearest price levelit is sitting right on a resistance level at $3.26 — a price it turned at six times since 2025-04-28, most recently on 2026-07-17. Since 2024-08-26 it has 8 such levels below the current price and 8 above. Levels like these describe where the price has reversed or paused before; they are not a forecast of where it will go.+0.1%
All-time lowits lowest closing price on record is $2.18 (set on 2025-11-18)$2.18
Above the all-time lowit is 49.2% above its all-time low+49.2%

Volatility

5
Band width vs its own 6 monthsday-to-day price swings are about average versus its own recent 6-month history41st percentile
Typical daily rangein a typical session it travels about $0.2481 between its high and its low — about 7.6% of its price. That is its "average true range" over the last 14 sessions, which also counts the distance from the previous close, so a day that opens well away from yesterday counts as the large move it was$0.2481
Bollinger bands (20-day, ±2σ)most of its recent trading has stayed between about $3.02 and $4.05 — the "Bollinger bands", a range drawn two standard deviations either side of its 20-day average price, which widens when the stock gets more volatile and narrows when it settles$3.02 – $3.53 – $4.05
Typical daily range (% of price)its price moves about 7.6% in a typical session — more volatile than most companies we cover. This is the average gap between a session's high and low over the last 14 sessions, counting overnight moves, expressed against the current price so it can be compared with companies trading at any price7.6%
Stretch from the 200-day averageit is trading 1.1 daily ranges below its 200-day average price (7.5% below it in plain percentage terms) — a way of asking how far it has stretched from its own average in units of how far it normally moves in a day, so a calm company and a jumpy one can be compared on the same scale1.1 daily ranges below its 200-day average

Volume

1
Volume vs its 30-day averagetrading volume is unusually light — only about 38% of its 30-day average0.38×

Candlestick patterns

2
Since a doji8 sessions ago it opened and closed at almost the same price after trading through a wider range — a "doji", the classic picture of buyers and sellers finishing the session level8 sessions ago
Since a hammer1 session ago, after a stretch of decline, it sold off hard during the session and then closed back near its high — a "hammer", the long lower wick showing the drop was bought back before the close1 session ago

Price gaps

3
Gap at the openit opened on 2026-08-26 0.9% below the previous session's close — an overnight gap, the part of the move that happened while the market was shut, and traded back through that level before the close-0.9%
Open gapit gapped 3.1% above the previous close 1 session ago and has not traded back through the level it left behind at 3.18 — an "unfilled gap", which describes a price range no trade has since crossed and is not a forecast that it will be crossed+3.1%
Gap filleda 2.7% gap down opened on 2026-08-24 has been "filled" today — price traded back through the level the gap left behind, and it took 2 sessions to closetoday

Price streaks

1
Closing streakit closed lower in its latest session, after a session that did not close lower — a single down day rather than a run1 session down

Relative strength

4
vs market, 1 monthover the past 1 month this stock lagged the market by 10.5 percentage points (the stock lost 6.9% while the market gained 3.7%)-10.5%
vs market, 3 monthsover the past 3 months this stock lagged the market by 51.0 percentage points (the stock lost 48.9% while the market gained 2.1%)-51.0%
vs market, 6 monthsover the past 6 months this stock beat the market by 3.2 percentage points (the stock gained 14.4% while the market gained 11.1%)+3.3%
vs market, 12 monthsover the past 12 months this stock lagged the market by 5.5 percentage points (the stock gained 13.2% while the market gained 18.7%)-5.5%

Signal agreement

2
Bullish technical signals3 of the 9 technical signals we can compute for it are currently in a bullish state: a "golden cross" — its 50-day average is above its 200-day, outperforming the market over 6 months, near the bottom of its 14-day range (oversold) — these describe past price behaviour, not a forecast3 of 9
Bearish technical signals3 of the 9 technical signals we can compute for it are currently in a bearish state: trading below its 200-day average, MACD momentum is negative, trading below the Ichimoku cloud — these describe past price behaviour, not a forecast3 of 9

Trend (Ichimoku cloud)

1
Vs the Ichimoku cloudtrading 25% below the Ichimoku cloud — a band drawn from where its own highs and lows sat up to 2026-07-21 and projected forward over today's price, the side traders read as an established downtrend, with the band above acting as the level that would have to be cleared. The band itself is thick, spanning 68.9% of the share price, which is taken to mean a barrier that has held for a while and takes effort to cross.-24.6%

Volume-weighted price

2
Vs this year’s average price paidthe price is 39% below the average price paid so far this year, so the typical buyer over that stretch is under water. That average is $5.32 — a volume-weighted average of daily closes over 160 sessions, not a true tick-by-tick VWAP.-38.7%
Vs the average paid since it last reportedthe price is 43% below the average price paid since it last reported on 2026-04-28 (its 8-K), so the typical buyer over that stretch is under water. That average is $5.74 — a volume-weighted average of daily closes over 81 sessions, not a true tick-by-tick VWAP.-43.2%

Price levels it has turned at before

MX last closed at $3.26 on 2026-08-26. Since 2024-08-26 it has turned at 8 prices below its last close and 8 above; the 3 nearest below and the 3 nearest above are listed, nearest first.

LevelSideDistanceEvidence
$3.26Resistance0.1% above the last closeturned there six times · 2025-04-28 to 2026-07-17
$3.11Support4.7% below the last closeturned there four times · 2025-08-13 to 2026-03-17
$3.01Support7.6% below the last closeturned there three times · 2026-03-05 to 2026-04-30
$3.54Resistance8.6% above the last closeturned there twice · 2024-11-20 to 2025-05-30
$2.95Support9.5% below the last closeturned there three times · 2025-05-06 to 2026-01-06
$3.82Resistance17.3% above the last closeturned there three times · 2025-01-14 to 2026-07-24

A level is a price this company reversed or paused at more than once — they describe past behaviour, not a forecast of where the price will go.

Wave structure

No Elliott-wave labelling currently fits its swings: the recent highs and lows do not satisfy the three rules a five-wave count has to obey, so there is no count to show rather than a count we are unsure about.

Read from daily closes as of 2026-08-26.

An Elliott-wave count describes the swings already printed and the level that would disprove it. It is not a forecast, a target, or advice.

Based on daily closing prices as of 2026-08-26. Describes past price behavior only — informational, not financial advice.

Ask about MX's technicals →

Key risks (from latest filing)

["Heavy reliance on labor unions representing a majority of the workforce, which may lead to work stoppages or increased costs.","Complexity of semiconductor manufacturing and reliance on independent subcontractors for packaging/testing, creating risks to yield and supply chain continuity.","Dependence on a limited number of independent foundries for certain product lines, such as Power ICs."]

See MX's biggest risks from its latest 10-Q →

What changed in the latest 10-Q

AI-assisted comparison of MX's 10-Q filed 2026-05-08 against the prior one filed 2025-11-10.

Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)

  • Added:
    • Reference to 'about 45 years' of operating history (newer uses 'about' qualifier)
    • Description of owning 'a substantial number of registered patents' rather than 'approximately 1,000 registered patents'
    • Addition of extensive discussion of macroeconomic conditions including inflation, interest rates, and geopolitical developments
    • Addition of specific geopolitical risk disclosures: Middle East tensions, potential U.S.-Israel-Iran escalation, China-Taiwan tensions
    • Addition of 'changes in global trade conditions, export controls, tariffs, geopolitical uncertainty' as demand risk factors
    • Addition of detail about 'heightened risks and uncertainties related to trade and export control policies, including the imposition of new tariffs'
    • Addition of discussion regarding supply chain disruptions and increased logistics and input costs from macroeconomic conditions
    • Addition of monitoring language for disruptions from 'geopolitical tensions, including in the Middle East and Eastern Europe'
    • Clarification that 'Substantially all' Power IC products use external foundry (vs. 'Certain' in older version)
  • Removed:
    • Reference to 'proven record' descriptor for operating history
    • Specific reference to '1,000 registered patents and pending applications'
    • Reference to 'servers' as a device application
    • Reference to 'solar inverters' (replaced with 'photovoltaic inverters')
    • Multi-paragraph discussion of 2024-2025 Power IC business transfer between MMS and MSK
    • Multi-paragraph discussion of March 7, 2025 Board authorization for pure-play Power company transition strategy
    • Multi-paragraph discussion of April 6, 2025 Board approval to shut down Display business and liquidate MMS
    • Reference to 'Discontinued Business' and 'Fab 3 foundry services'
    • Reference to 'Design center in Korea and global manufacturing operations' (newer specifies 'design center and substantial manufacturing operations in Korea')
    • Phrase 'manage to ensure outsourcing wafers at competitive price' (grammatically corrected in newer version)
    • Discussion of trends and cyclicality in semiconductor industry (moved/integrated in newer version)
  • Reworded:
    • Changed from 'Power discrete products' to 'Power Analog Solutions products' throughout
    • Changed 'desktop personal computers ("PCs")' to 'desktop PCs'
    • Changed 'others consumer electronics' to 'other consumer electronics'
    • Expanded demand risk factors from 'periods of weak consumer and enterprise spending or by market share losses' to include multiple trade and geopolitical factors
    • Changed 'other potential customer' to 'other potential customers'
    • Changed 'design center in Korea and global manufacturing operations' to 'design center and substantial manufacturing operations in Korea'
    • Reordered and expanded discussion of understanding customer needs and market trends to emphasize macroeconomic influences
    • Changed 'manage to ensure outsourcing wafers at competitive price' to 'seek to ensure we outsource wafers at competitive prices'
    • Expanded language about internal manufacturing capacity benefits to include intellectual property protection emphasis
  • Notes:
    • The newer filing appears truncated at the end ('du' incomplete word), limiting full comparison of any subsequent content
    • The older filing also appears truncated ('semic' incomplete word), limiting full comparison
    • The older filing contains substantial disclosure about business restructuring (Display business shutdown, MMS liquidation) that is entirely absent from the newer filing, suggesting these sections may have been moved to different MD&A subsections rather than removed

Risk Factors

The two filings could not be meaningfully compared for this section.

AI-assisted comparison of two SEC filing sections. It describes wording and theme changes only, makes no materiality, legal, or investment judgement, and is not financial advice. Informational only — not financial advice.

Ask what changed in MX's latest 10-Q →

Insider activity (SEC Form 4)

No open-market insider purchases or sales recorded in the last 90 days.

  • Last 180 days3 buys ($167974) · 0 sells — 1 buying insider

Most recent open-market transaction: 2026-03-16. As of 2026-08-27.

View full insider trading history → View SEC Form 3/4/5 filings

Ask about MX's insider activity →

Only open-market purchases (SEC code P) and sales (code S) are counted here. Option exercises, vesting/awards, gifts, and shares withheld for taxes are excluded — they are compensation or mechanical, not open-market conviction. Sales may be planned and non-discretionary (e.g. a Rule 10b5-1 plan) and are not necessarily bearish; open-market buying is not a recommendation to buy. Informational only — not financial advice.

Institutional ownership (13F)

5 institutional 13F filers reported holding MX as of 2026-03-31 (quarter-end position, filed within 45 days).

  • Distinct 13F filers 5
  • Reported shares held 372,400
  • Reported value $1,042,720

reported quarterly holdings change (2025-12-31 → 2026-03-31): 1 new, 2 increased, 0 decreased, 0 exited. Change counts cover only managers that filed 13F reports in BOTH quarters, derived between two quarter-end snapshots — not same-day trades; a single manager is never said to have "bought" or "sold".

Institutional holdings are quarter-end long positions reported on SEC Form 13F-HR, filed up to 45 days after the quarter ends — they are delayed, are not real-time trades, exclude short positions and most non-US securities, and are not investment advice. Any increase/decrease is a reported change between two quarterly snapshots, not a same-day purchase or sale. These are quarter-end snapshots from the 13F filings on SEC EDGAR, filed within 45 days — not real-time, and any change is a difference between two quarterly reports, not a same-day trade. Informational only — not financial advice.

Ask about MX's institutional holders →

Short interest (FINRA)

MX had 1,150,803 shares of reported short interest as of the 2026-07-31 FINRA settlement date (delayed, bi-monthly; not real-time).

MX had 3.15% of its shares outstanding sold short as of the 2026-07-31 FINRA settlement date (percent of FLOAT would be higher — float is not disclosed in the source). FINRA reported 1.14 days to cover at the same settlement.

  • Reported short interest (shares) 1,150,803
  • Short interest (% of shares outstanding) 3.15%
  • Prior settlement (shares) 1,106,250
  • Reported change 4.03%
  • Days to cover (reported) 1.14

Reported to FINRA as of the 2026-07-31 settlement date. Short interest is reported to FINRA and published on a delayed, bi-monthly schedule (as of a settlement date, disseminated roughly eight business days later) — it is NOT real-time, does not cover every venue or all US trading, and is not a short-squeeze prediction or investment advice. Days-to-cover is the value FINRA reports; percent of float is not shown because the source file carries no share-count denominator — where a percent appears it is of shares OUTSTANDING, the larger base, and is therefore a floor on percent of float. Informational only — not financial advice.

Ask about MX's short interest →

Competitors & peers

AI-enriched competitor set. Linked names are companies covered by stocks-llm; other named peers are shown for reference only.

Not quite? Describe exactly what you want →

Compare MX vs…

MagnaChip Semiconductor Corp is found in…

MX ranks in…

Frequently asked questions

What does MagnaChip Semiconductor Corp (MX) do?

MagnaChip Semiconductor Corporation is a designer and manufacturer of analog and mixed-signal semiconductor platform solutions for communications, IoT, consumer, and industrial applications. The company specializes in power solutions and display solutions, providing products such as power ICs and display driver integrated circuits (DDICs). Its business model integrates internal manufacturing capabilities for specific processes with outsourced semiconductor assembly and testing services.

What sector is MagnaChip Semiconductor Corp (MX) in?

MagnaChip Semiconductor Corp (MX) is classified in the Information Technology sector. Its industry is Power and Display Semiconductors. It trades on NYSE.

Who are MagnaChip Semiconductor Corp's (MX) competitors?

Notable peers of MagnaChip Semiconductor Corp (MX) include ON Semiconductor, Infineon Technologies, STMicroelectronics, Texas Instruments and Synaptics. This peer set is informational only — not financial advice.

Is MagnaChip Semiconductor Corp (MX) overbought or oversold right now?

MagnaChip Semiconductor Corp (MX) is currently neither overbought nor oversold — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 40, in the neutral middle (as of 2026-08-26). RSI describes recent price momentum, not a forecast — informational only, not financial advice.

Where does stocks-llm's data on MX come from?

Fundamentals and prices come from market data, as of 2026-08-26; company filings and profile facts come from SEC EDGAR. All figures are delayed daily-close data shown with their as-of date — informational only, not financial advice.

Fundamentals: market data, as of 2026-08-26. Filings: SEC EDGAR. Prices are delayed daily-close data.

Last updated 2026-08-26.

Informational only — NOT financial advice. All figures are delayed daily-close data from SEC EDGAR & market data, shown with their as-of date.

Research stocks in your own words.

Informational only — NOT financial advice.

ScreenersBlogPrivacyiOS app