MagnaChip Semiconductor Corp (MX)
Information Technology · power semiconductors · NYSE
MagnaChip is a South Korea-based provider of analog and mixed-signal power semiconductor solutions for high-growth industrial, automotive, and consumer electronics applications.
What MagnaChip Semiconductor Corp does
MagnaChip Semiconductor is a designer and manufacturer of analog and mixed-signal power semiconductor platform solutions. The company serves diverse applications across industrial, automotive, communication, consumer, and computing markets with products including MOSFETs, IGBTs, and various power integrated circuits such as AC-DC/DC-DC converters and PMICs. It operates through internal manufacturing facilities in Korea and strategic external foundry partnerships.
Recent developments
Chae Lee was appointed as the new Chief Executive Officer. The company recently launched 6th-generation 600V SJ MOSFETs for AI servers and EV charging, and formed a strategic partnership with Navitas Semiconductor to license SiC technology.
From MagnaChip Semiconductor Corp's filing of 2026-08-10.
Themes: power electronics, AI infrastructure, EV supply chain, analog and mixed-signal semiconductors
Fundamentals
- Price$2.58 as of 2026-10-20 close
- Market cap$94M as of 2026-07-31 (share count; price 2026-10-20)
- 1-year return-14.9% 2025-10-20 close $3.03 → 2026-10-20 close $2.58
- P/En/a negative earnings
- Net margin-16.6% FY2025, SEC XBRL
- Gross margin+17.6% FY2025, SEC XBRL
- ROE-12.0% FY2025, SEC XBRL
- ROICn/a No figure: its pre-tax income was zero or negative, so there is no tax rate to apply.
- Debt / equity0.18 borrowings, leases excluded / equity — 10-Q/10-K balance sheet 2026-06-30
- Revenue growth (YoY)-8.9% FY2025, SEC XBRL
- Revenue CAGR (3y)-19.1% SEC XBRL
- Beta1.79 as of 2026-09-03
- Last reported earnings2026-07-29 SEC EDGAR Form 8-K (Item 2.02)
How MX compares in its sector
- net profit marginbottom 25% 379 covered Information Technology peers, as of 2026-09-03
- operating marginbottom 25% 374 covered Information Technology peers, as of 2026-09-03
- gross marginbottom 25% 310 covered Information Technology peers, as of 2026-09-03
- return on equitybottom 25% 369 covered Information Technology peers, as of 2026-09-03
- 3-year revenue CAGRbottom 10% 383 covered Information Technology peers
- free cash flow (absolute dollars, latest fiscal year)bottom 25% 380 covered Information Technology peers, as of FY2025
Position among covered Information Technology companies that report each metric (minimum 5 peers). A relative position within our covered catalog — not a valuation, quality, or investment judgment. A higher percentile is simply a higher value (for P/E, more expensive on earnings — never "better"). Informational only.
Dividend coverage
Not assessed — last reported dividend predates the accounts. The most recent fiscal year in which MX reported a dividend payment is FY2010, while its reported financial statements run through FY2025. Coverage is therefore not assessed for the latest year — an FY2010 ratio would not describe MX today.
Coverage is derived from reported SEC EDGAR XBRL figures, comparing dividends paid against net income and free cash flow for the SAME fiscal year. It is not shown here because the latest fiscal year with a reported dividend payment (FY2010) is older than the latest year of reported financial statements (FY2025), so any ratio would describe an out-of-date year. Informational only — not financial advice.
Quarterly results
| Quarter | Revenue | Gross profit | Operating income | Net income | Diluted EPS | Operating cash flow | Capex |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 FY2026 2026-06-30 | $45M | $9M | -$10M | -$5M | -$0.13 | -$4502† | $1329† |
| Q1 FY2026 2026-03-31 | $46M | $7M | -$7M | -$5M | -$0.13 | $1556 | $3915 |
| Q4 FY2025 2025-12-31 | $41M† | $4M† | -$12M† | -$8M† | -$0.22† | $5M† | $10M† |
| Q3 FY2025 2025-09-30 | $46M | $9M | -$12M | -$13M | -$0.36 | -$30M† | $20M† |
| Q2 FY2025 2025-06-30 | $48M | $10M | -$7M | $323000 | $0.01 | -$25132† | $11875† |
| Q1 FY2025 2025-03-31 | $45M | $9M | -$5M | -$9M | -$0.24 | -$4669 | $208 |
| Q4 FY2024 2024-12-31 | $51M† | $11M† | -$7M† | -$16M† | -$0.44† | $12M† | $7M† |
| Q3 FY2024 2024-09-30 | $55M | $12M | -$4M | -$10M | -$0.26 | -$13M† | $3M† |
† Not filed as a discrete quarter: derived from the company's own year-to-date figures (for example the fourth quarter as the fiscal year minus the first nine months). A derived per-share figure is approximate, because the share count moves within the year.
Balance sheet at 2026-06-30
- Cash and equivalents$88M
- Total debt$42M borrowings only; leases excluded
- Net debt-$46M total debt − cash − short-term investments
From the company's own SEC 10-Q and 10-K filings (XBRL), re-read every week. Figures in US dollars as filed; informational only — not financial advice.
How MagnaChip Semiconductor Corp looks technically
MagnaChip Semiconductor Corp (MX) is trading 28.8% below its 200-day average, the long-term trend line — a long-term downtrend. Its 50-day average crossed below its 200-day average about 29 trading days ago — a "death cross", a bearish long-term signal. A trend is forming but not yet strong — ADX, a 0–100 trend-strength gauge, is 22 (a reading of 25+ marks a strong trend). Momentum is neutral — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 32, neither overbought (above 70) nor oversold (below 30). MACD, a trend-momentum gauge, turned bearish about 9 trading days ago (its momentum flipped negative). It made a new 20-day low about 3 trading days ago. It is 73.8% below its highest point of the past year. Trading volume is unusually light — only about 35% of its 30-day average.
Trend
8
| Distance from the 200-day | it is trading 28.8% below its 200-day average, the long-term trend line — a long-term downtrend | -28.8% |
|---|---|---|
| 50-day moving average | its average price over the last 50 trading days — a short-term trend line — is $3.20 | $3.20 |
| 200-day moving average | its average price over the last 200 trading days — the long-term trend line — is $3.62 | $3.62 |
| Swing structure | each recent peak has been higher than the one before it and each dip has been shallower — the pattern chart-watchers call an uptrend, which describes where price has already been and not where it goes next | higher highs and higher lows |
| Last swing turn | its last significant turn was a swing high 21 calendar days ago — the swings before that are what the structure reading is measured on | 21 sessions |
| Wave structure | its recent swings can be read as a completed three-part upward correction — a pullback in the A-B-C shape Elliott-wave chartists use; the labelling fails if price closes above 4.33. It is the only labelling that fits, though not with textbook proportions, and it describes the swings already printed, not what comes next. | possible three-wave upward correction, complete (atypical proportions) |
| Since the 50/200 cross | its 50-day average crossed below its 200-day average about 29 trading days ago — a "death cross", a bearish long-term signal | 29 sessions |
| Trend strength (14-day ADX) | a trend is forming but not yet strong — ADX, a 0–100 trend-strength gauge, is 22 (a reading of 25+ marks a strong trend) | 22.4 |
Momentum
3
| 14-day RSI | momentum is neutral — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 32, neither overbought (above 70) nor oversold (below 30) | 32.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Position in its 14-day range | it is trading near the bottom of its 14-day range ($2.49 to $3.79) — its "stochastic" reading is 7 out of 100, where 0 would mean closing exactly at the 14-session low and 100 exactly at the high. This measures WHERE the price sits inside its recent range, which is a different question from the RSI beside it: RSI is a momentum gauge, measuring how FAST the price has been moving, so a stock can drift quietly to the bottom of its range with an ordinary RSI, or fall sharply and still sit in the middle. It has been climbing within that range over the last few sessions. | 6.9 |
| Since the MACD crossed zero | MACD, a trend-momentum gauge, turned bearish about 9 trading days ago (its momentum flipped negative) | 9 sessions |
Range
12
| 52-week high | its highest closing price over the past year (about 252 trading days) was $9.86 | $9.86 |
|---|---|---|
| From the 52-week high | it is 73.8% below its 52-week high (its highest price of the past year) | -73.8% |
| Above the 52-week low | it is 18.1% above its 52-week low (its lowest price of the past year) | +18.1% |
| Below the 52-week high | it is 73.8% below its highest point of the past year | 73.8% |
| Since a 20-day breakout | it made a new 20-day low about 3 trading days ago | 3 sessions |
| Since a 55-day breakout | it made a new 55-day low about 3 trading days ago | 3 sessions |
| All-time high | its highest closing price on record is $26.98 (set on 2021-04-05) | $26.98 |
| Given back of the 52-week move | over the past year its closes ranged ($2.27 to $8.93), and it has given back all of its rise from last year’s low — 95% of it. Chart-watchers call 61.8%-65% given back the "golden pocket" — for this company that is $4.60 to $4.81. It is watched widely enough that orders cluster there, which is the honest reason it matters; it is not a forecast. | 95.3% |
| From the all-time high | it is 90.4% below its all-time high | -90.4% |
| Nearest price level | it is trading 1.7% below a resistance level at $2.63 — a price it turned at twice since 2026-03-09, most recently on 2026-03-20. Since 2024-10-21 it has 1 such level below the current price and 12 above. Levels like these describe where the price has reversed or paused before; they are not a forecast of where it will go. | +1.7% |
| All-time low | its lowest closing price on record is $2.18 (set on 2025-11-18) | $2.18 |
| Above the all-time low | it is 18.1% above its all-time low | +18.1% |
Volatility
5
| Band width vs its own 6 months | day-to-day price swings are about average versus its own recent 6-month history | 57th percentile |
|---|---|---|
| Typical daily range | in a typical session it travels about $0.2032 between its high and its low — about 7.9% of its price. That is its "average true range" over the last 14 sessions, which also counts the distance from the previous close, so a day that opens well away from yesterday counts as the large move it was | $0.2032 |
| Bollinger bands (20-day, ±2σ) | most of its recent trading has stayed between about $2.33 and $4.05 — the "Bollinger bands", a range drawn two standard deviations either side of its 20-day average price, which widens when the stock gets more volatile and narrows when it settles | $2.33 – $3.19 – $4.05 |
| Typical daily range (% of price) | its price moves about 7.9% in a typical session — more volatile than most companies we cover. This is the average gap between a session's high and low over the last 14 sessions, counting overnight moves, expressed against the current price so it can be compared with companies trading at any price | 7.9% |
| Stretch from the 200-day average | it is trading 5.1 daily ranges below its 200-day average price (28.8% below it in plain percentage terms) — a way of asking how far it has stretched from its own average in units of how far it normally moves in a day, so a calm company and a jumpy one can be compared on the same scale | 5.1 daily ranges below its 200-day average |
Volume
1
| Volume vs its 30-day average | trading volume is unusually light — only about 35% of its 30-day average | 0.35× |
|---|
Candlestick patterns
1
| Since a bullish engulfing | 3 sessions ago it opened below the previous session's close and finished above that session's open — a "bullish engulfing" pair, where one up day more than undid the down day before it | 3 sessions ago |
|---|
Price gaps
3
| Gap at the open | it opened on 2026-10-20 2.0% below the previous session's close — an overnight gap, the part of the move that happened while the market was shut, and traded back through that level before the close | -1.9% |
|---|---|---|
| Open gap | it gapped 3.2% below the previous close 4 sessions ago and has not traded back through the level it left behind at 2.84 — an "unfilled gap", which describes a price range no trade has since crossed and is not a forecast that it will be crossed | -3.2% |
| Gap filled | a 2.1% gap down opened on 2026-10-13 has been "filled" 5 sessions ago — price traded back through the level the gap left behind, and it closed again during the very session that opened it | 5 sessions ago |
Price streaks
1
| Closing streak | it closed higher in its latest session, after a session that did not close higher — a single up day rather than a run | 1 session up |
|---|
Relative strength
4
| vs market, 1 month | over the past 1 month this stock lagged the market by 7.1 percentage points (the stock lost 6.2% while the market gained 1.0%) | -7.2% |
|---|---|---|
| vs market, 3 months | over the past 3 months this stock lagged the market by 27.3 percentage points (the stock lost 23.7% while the market gained 3.6%) | -27.3% |
| vs market, 6 months | over the past 6 months this stock lagged the market by 31.7 percentage points (the stock lost 23.2% while the market gained 8.5%) | -31.7% |
| vs market, 12 months | over the past 12 months this stock lagged the market by 29.4 percentage points (the stock lost 14.9% while the market gained 14.6%) | -29.4% |
Signal agreement
2
| Bullish technical signals | 1 of the 9 technical signals we can compute for it is currently in a bullish state: near the bottom of its 14-day range (oversold) — these describe past price behaviour, not a forecast | 1 of 9 |
|---|---|---|
| Bearish technical signals | 6 of the 9 technical signals we can compute for it are currently in a bearish state: a "death cross" — its 50-day average is below its 200-day, trading below its 200-day average, a fresh 20-day low, MACD momentum is negative, lagging the market over 6 months, trading below the Ichimoku cloud — these describe past price behaviour, not a forecast | 6 of 9 |
Trend (Ichimoku cloud)
1
| Vs the Ichimoku cloud | trading 20% below the Ichimoku cloud — a band drawn from where its own highs and lows sat up to 2026-09-14 and projected forward over today's price, the side traders read as an established downtrend, with the band above acting as the level that would have to be cleared. The band itself is thick, spanning 19.5% of the share price, which is taken to mean a barrier that has held for a while and takes effort to cross. | -20.1% |
|---|
Volume-weighted price
2
| Vs this year’s average price paid | the price is 48% below the average price paid so far this year, so the typical buyer over that stretch is under water. That average is $4.98 — a volume-weighted average of daily closes over 198 sessions, not a true tick-by-tick VWAP. | -48.2% |
|---|---|---|
| Vs the average paid since it last reported | the price is 51% below the average price paid since it last reported on 2026-04-28 (its 8-K), so the typical buyer over that stretch is under water. That average is $5.24 — a volume-weighted average of daily closes over 119 sessions, not a true tick-by-tick VWAP. | -50.7% |
Price levels it has turned at before
MX last closed at $2.58 on 2026-10-20. Since 2024-10-21 it has turned at 1 price below its last close and 12 above; the nearest below and the 3 nearest above are listed, nearest first.
| Level | Side | Distance | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| $2.63 | Resistance | 1.7% above the last close | turned there twice · 2026-03-09 to 2026-03-20 |
| $2.52 | Support | 2.3% below the last close | turned there twice · 2025-04-09 to 2025-12-31 |
| $2.67 | Resistance | 3.4% above the last close | turned there twice · 2025-08-11 to 2026-03-30 |
| $2.80 | Resistance | 8.3% above the last close | turned there twice · 2025-12-22 to 2026-02-05 |
A level is a price this company reversed or paused at more than once — they describe past behaviour, not a forecast of where the price will go.
Wave structure
Its recent swings can be read as a three-part upward correction — the A-B-C shape chartists use for a pullback — now complete.
This labelling fails — stops being a possible reading at all — if it closes above $4.33.
It is the only labelling that fits these swings, though its proportions are not the textbook ones.
This reading has stood for 11 trading days, since 2026-10-06.
Read from daily closes as of 2026-10-20.
An Elliott-wave count describes the swings already printed and the level that would disprove it. It is not a forecast, a target, or advice.
Screens: Trading below the 200-day moving average · Trading below the 50-day moving average · Recent death cross (50-day crossed below 200-day) · Pulled back from the 12-month high · Broke down to a new 20-day low · lagging the market | Learn: moving average · golden cross · adx · rsi · macd · breakout · fifty two week high low · volume and relative volume
Based on daily closing prices as of 2026-10-20. Describes past price behavior only — informational, not financial advice.
Key risks (from latest filing)
["High dependence on successful manufacturing yields and potential foundry supply disruptions.","Significant exposure to labor union negotiations and potential work stoppages in South Korea.","Risks associated with international supply chain logistics, trade policies, and geopolitical tensions."]
What changed in the latest 10-Q
AI-assisted comparison of MX's 10-Q filed 2026-05-08 against the prior one filed 2025-11-10.
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
- Added:
- Reference to 'about 45 years' of operating history (newer uses 'about' qualifier)
- Description of owning 'a substantial number of registered patents' rather than 'approximately 1,000 registered patents'
- Addition of extensive discussion of macroeconomic conditions including inflation, interest rates, and geopolitical developments
- Addition of specific geopolitical risk disclosures: Middle East tensions, potential U.S.-Israel-Iran escalation, China-Taiwan tensions
- Addition of 'changes in global trade conditions, export controls, tariffs, geopolitical uncertainty' as demand risk factors
- Addition of detail about 'heightened risks and uncertainties related to trade and export control policies, including the imposition of new tariffs'
- Addition of discussion regarding supply chain disruptions and increased logistics and input costs from macroeconomic conditions
- Addition of monitoring language for disruptions from 'geopolitical tensions, including in the Middle East and Eastern Europe'
- Clarification that 'Substantially all' Power IC products use external foundry (vs. 'Certain' in older version)
- Removed:
- Reference to 'proven record' descriptor for operating history
- Specific reference to '1,000 registered patents and pending applications'
- Reference to 'servers' as a device application
- Reference to 'solar inverters' (replaced with 'photovoltaic inverters')
- Multi-paragraph discussion of 2024-2025 Power IC business transfer between MMS and MSK
- Multi-paragraph discussion of March 7, 2025 Board authorization for pure-play Power company transition strategy
- Multi-paragraph discussion of April 6, 2025 Board approval to shut down Display business and liquidate MMS
- Reference to 'Discontinued Business' and 'Fab 3 foundry services'
- Reference to 'Design center in Korea and global manufacturing operations' (newer specifies 'design center and substantial manufacturing operations in Korea')
- Phrase 'manage to ensure outsourcing wafers at competitive price' (grammatically corrected in newer version)
- Discussion of trends and cyclicality in semiconductor industry (moved/integrated in newer version)
- Reworded:
- Changed from 'Power discrete products' to 'Power Analog Solutions products' throughout
- Changed 'desktop personal computers ("PCs")' to 'desktop PCs'
- Changed 'others consumer electronics' to 'other consumer electronics'
- Expanded demand risk factors from 'periods of weak consumer and enterprise spending or by market share losses' to include multiple trade and geopolitical factors
- Changed 'other potential customer' to 'other potential customers'
- Changed 'design center in Korea and global manufacturing operations' to 'design center and substantial manufacturing operations in Korea'
- Reordered and expanded discussion of understanding customer needs and market trends to emphasize macroeconomic influences
- Changed 'manage to ensure outsourcing wafers at competitive price' to 'seek to ensure we outsource wafers at competitive prices'
- Expanded language about internal manufacturing capacity benefits to include intellectual property protection emphasis
- Notes:
- The newer filing appears truncated at the end ('du' incomplete word), limiting full comparison of any subsequent content
- The older filing also appears truncated ('semic' incomplete word), limiting full comparison
- The older filing contains substantial disclosure about business restructuring (Display business shutdown, MMS liquidation) that is entirely absent from the newer filing, suggesting these sections may have been moved to different MD&A subsections rather than removed
AI-assisted comparison of two SEC filing sections. It describes wording and theme changes only, makes no materiality, legal, or investment judgement, and is not financial advice. Informational only — not financial advice.
Insider activity (SEC Form 4)
3 open-market purchases and 0 open-market sales by insiders in the last 90 days, of which we have read Form 4 filings through 2026-10-16. The 5 days since 2026-10-16 have not been checked yet.
- Last 30 days · read to 2026-10-163 buys ($318496) · 0 sells — 1 buying insider
- Last 90 days · read to 2026-10-163 buys ($318496) · 0 sells — 1 buying insider
- Last 180 days · read to 2026-10-163 buys ($318496) · 0 sells — 1 buying insider
Activity heuristic: net buying (a transparent product heuristic from the counts above, not a prediction or advice)
Most recent open-market transaction: 2026-09-24. Based on Form 4 filings read through 2026-10-16; anything filed since is not yet included.
View full insider trading history → View SEC Form 3/4/5 filingsAsk about MX's insider activity →
Only open-market purchases (SEC code P) and sales (code S) are counted here. Option exercises, vesting/awards, gifts, and shares withheld for taxes are excluded — they are compensation or mechanical, not open-market conviction. Sales may be planned and non-discretionary (e.g. a Rule 10b5-1 plan) and are not necessarily bearish; open-market buying is not a recommendation to buy. Informational only — not financial advice.
Institutional ownership (13F)
5 institutional 13F filers reported holding MX as of 2026-06-30 (quarter-end position, filed within 45 days).
- Distinct 13F filers 5
- Reported shares held 1,459,792
- Reported value $6,904,816
reported quarterly holdings change (2026-03-31 → 2026-06-30): 0 new, 3 increased, 1 decreased, 0 exited. Change counts cover only managers that filed 13F reports in BOTH quarters, derived between two quarter-end snapshots — not same-day trades; a single manager is never said to have "bought" or "sold".
Institutional holdings are quarter-end long positions reported on SEC Form 13F-HR, filed up to 45 days after the quarter ends — they are delayed, are not real-time trades, exclude short positions and most non-US securities, and are not investment advice. Any increase/decrease is a reported change between two quarterly snapshots, not a same-day purchase or sale. These are quarter-end snapshots from the 13F filings on SEC EDGAR, filed within 45 days — not real-time, and any change is a difference between two quarterly reports, not a same-day trade. Informational only — not financial advice.
Ask about MX's institutional holders → See what each manager we track holds →
Short interest (FINRA)
MX had 1,672,866 shares of reported short interest as of the 2026-09-30 FINRA settlement date (delayed, bi-monthly; not real-time).
MX had 4.58% of its shares outstanding sold short as of the 2026-09-30 FINRA settlement date (percent of FLOAT would be higher — float is not disclosed in the source). FINRA reported 1 days to cover at the same settlement.
- Reported short interest (shares) 1,672,866
- Short interest (% of shares outstanding) 4.58%
- Prior settlement (shares) 1,212,466
- Reported change 37.97%
- Days to cover (reported) 1
Reported to FINRA as of the 2026-09-30 settlement date. Short interest is reported to FINRA and published on a delayed, bi-monthly schedule (as of a settlement date, disseminated roughly eight business days later) — it is NOT real-time, does not cover every venue or all US trading, and is not a short-squeeze prediction or investment advice. Days-to-cover is the value FINRA reports; percent of float is not shown because the source file carries no share-count denominator — where a percent appears it is of shares OUTSTANDING, the larger base, and is therefore a floor on percent of float. Informational only — not financial advice.
Competitors & peers
- ON Semiconductor (ON)
- Infineon Technologies (IFNNY)
- STMicroelectronics (STM)
- Diodes Incorporated (DIOD)
- Vishay Intertechnology (VSH)
- Navitas Semiconductor (NVTS)
AI-enriched competitor set. Linked names are companies covered by stocks-llm; other named peers are shown for reference only.
Compare MX vs…
MagnaChip Semiconductor Corp is found in…
MX ranks in…
Frequently asked questions
What does MagnaChip Semiconductor Corp (MX) do?
MagnaChip Semiconductor is a designer and manufacturer of analog and mixed-signal power semiconductor platform solutions. The company serves diverse applications across industrial, automotive, communication, consumer, and computing markets with products including MOSFETs, IGBTs, and various power integrated circuits such as AC-DC/DC-DC converters and PMICs. It operates through internal manufacturing facilities in Korea and strategic external foundry partnerships.
What sector is MagnaChip Semiconductor Corp (MX) in?
MagnaChip Semiconductor Corp (MX) is classified in the Information Technology sector. Its industry is power semiconductors. It trades on NYSE.
Who are MagnaChip Semiconductor Corp's (MX) competitors?
Notable peers of MagnaChip Semiconductor Corp (MX) include ON Semiconductor, Infineon Technologies, STMicroelectronics, Diodes Incorporated and Vishay Intertechnology. This peer set is informational only — not financial advice.
Is MagnaChip Semiconductor Corp (MX) overbought or oversold right now?
MagnaChip Semiconductor Corp (MX) is currently neither overbought nor oversold — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 32, in the neutral middle (as of 2026-10-20). RSI describes recent price momentum, not a forecast — informational only, not financial advice.
Where does stocks-llm's data on MX come from?
Fundamentals come from SEC XBRL company filings for the figures marked with a fiscal year, and market data, as of 2026-09-03 for the rest; prices are market data, as of 2026-09-03; company filings and profile facts come from SEC EDGAR. All figures are delayed daily-close data shown with their as-of date — informational only, not financial advice.
Fundamentals: SEC XBRL company filings for the figures marked with a fiscal year, and market data, as of 2026-09-03 for the rest. Filings: SEC EDGAR. Prices are delayed daily-close data.
Last updated 2026-10-20.
Informational only — NOT financial advice. All figures are delayed daily-close data from SEC EDGAR & market data, shown with their as-of date.