NANO NUCLEAR ENERGY INC (NNE)
Industrials · Nuclear Energy / Advanced Reactor Technology · NASDAQ
Nano Nuclear Energy is a technology-focused company developing modular microreactors and providing nuclear fuel, transportation, and technical consulting services.
What NANO NUCLEAR ENERGY INC does
Nano Nuclear Energy is an early-stage company focused on the development of advanced nuclear microreactors and associated nuclear energy technologies. The company is also building a business around nuclear fuel supply chain capabilities, specialized nuclear material transportation, and technical consultancy services for the nuclear industry.
Themes: advanced nuclear reactors / microreactors, nuclear energy supply chain, nuclear logistics and transportation, clean energy technology
Fundamentals
- Price$15.26 as of 2026-10-08 close
- Market cap$819M as of 2026-08-10 (share count; price 2026-10-08)
- 1-year return-67.6% 2025-10-08 close $47.04 → 2026-10-08 close $15.26
- P/En/a negative earnings
- ROE-18.0% FY2025, SEC XBRL
- Debt / equity0.00 as of 2026-09-03
- Beta2.63 as of 2026-09-03
- Last reported earningsn/a no earnings announcement (Form 8-K, Item 2.02) has been filed in our data yet
How NNE compares in its sector
- return on equitybottom 10% 432 covered Industrials peers, as of 2026-09-03
- free cash flow (absolute dollars, latest fiscal year)bottom 25% 417 covered Industrials peers, as of FY2025
Position among covered Industrials companies that report each metric (minimum 5 peers). A relative position within our covered catalog — not a valuation, quality, or investment judgment. A higher percentile is simply a higher value (for P/E, more expensive on earnings — never "better"). Informational only.
How NANO NUCLEAR ENERGY INC looks technically
NANO NUCLEAR ENERGY INC (NNE) is trading 34.2% below its 200-day average, the long-term trend line — a long-term downtrend. Its 50-day average crossed below its 200-day average about 183 trading days ago — a "death cross", a bearish long-term signal. There is no clear trend right now — the price is choppy (ADX, a 0–100 trend-strength gauge, is 18, below the 25 that marks a real trend), though sellers have been pushing harder than buyers lately — pressure, not a trend. Momentum is neutral — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 40, neither overbought (above 70) nor oversold (below 30). MACD, a trend-momentum gauge, turned bearish about 1 trading day ago (its momentum flipped negative). It just made a new 20-day low, its first since 2026-07-29, breaking below its recent trading range. It is 3.7% above its 52-week low (its lowest price of the past year). Day-to-day price swings are unusually narrow versus its own recent history — a "Bollinger squeeze" (in the tightest 1% of the past ~6 months), which often precedes a bigger move.
Trend
8
| Distance from the 200-day | it is trading 34.2% below its 200-day average, the long-term trend line — a long-term downtrend | -34.2% |
|---|---|---|
| 50-day moving average | its average price over the last 50 trading days — a short-term trend line — is $17.50 | $17.50 |
| 200-day moving average | its average price over the last 200 trading days — the long-term trend line — is $23.20 | $23.20 |
| Swing structure | each recent peak has been lower than the one before it and each dip deeper — the pattern chart-watchers call a downtrend, which describes where price has already been and not where it goes next | lower highs and lower lows |
| Last swing turn | its last significant turn was a swing high 15 calendar days ago — the swings before that are what the structure reading is measured on | 15 sessions |
| Wave structure | its recent swings can be read as a five-part downward sequence — what Elliott-wave chartists call an impulse — now in leg 3 of five; the labelling fails if price closes above 17.44. It is one of several labellings that fit, and it describes the swings already printed, not what comes next. The same swings also read as a three-part correction in leg C. | possible downward five-wave sequence, in wave 3 (one of several readings) |
| Since the 50/200 cross | its 50-day average crossed below its 200-day average about 183 trading days ago — a "death cross", a bearish long-term signal | 183 sessions |
| Trend strength (14-day ADX) | there is no clear trend right now — the price is choppy (ADX, a 0–100 trend-strength gauge, is 18, below the 25 that marks a real trend), though sellers have been pushing harder than buyers lately — pressure, not a trend | 17.5 |
Momentum
3
| 14-day RSI | momentum is neutral — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 40, neither overbought (above 70) nor oversold (below 30) | 40.3 |
|---|---|---|
| Position in its 14-day range | it is trading near the bottom of its 14-day range ($14.82 to $17.44) — its "stochastic" reading is 17 out of 100, where 0 would mean closing exactly at the 14-session low and 100 exactly at the high. This measures WHERE the price sits inside its recent range, which is a different question from the RSI beside it: RSI is a momentum gauge, measuring how FAST the price has been moving, so a stock can drift quietly to the bottom of its range with an ordinary RSI, or fall sharply and still sit in the middle. It has been slipping within that range over the last few sessions. | 16.8 |
| Since the MACD crossed zero | MACD, a trend-momentum gauge, turned bearish about 1 trading day ago (its momentum flipped negative) | 1 session |
Range
12
| 52-week high | its highest closing price over the past year (about 252 trading days) was $60.87 | $60.87 |
|---|---|---|
| From the 52-week high | it is 74.9% below its 52-week high (its highest price of the past year) | -74.9% |
| Above the 52-week low | it is 3.7% above its 52-week low (its lowest price of the past year) | +3.7% |
| Below the 52-week high | it is 74.9% below its highest point of the past year | 74.9% |
| Since a 20-day breakout | it just made a new 20-day low, its first since 2026-07-29, breaking below its recent trading range | 1 session |
| Since a 55-day breakout | it made a new 55-day low about 51 trading days ago | 51 sessions |
| All-time high | its highest closing price on record is $60.87 (set on 2025-10-15) | $60.87 |
| Given back of the 52-week move | over the past year its closes ranged ($14.88 to $56.63), and it has recovered essentially none of its fall from last year’s high — 1% of it. Chart-watchers call 61.8%-65% given back the "golden pocket" — for this company that is $40.68 to $42.02. It is watched widely enough that orders cluster there, which is the honest reason it matters; it is not a forecast. | 0.9% |
| From the all-time high | it is 74.9% below its all-time high | -74.9% |
| Nearest price level | it is trading 1.1% above a support level at $15.10 — a price it turned at twice since 2024-10-15, most recently on 2026-09-16. Since 2024-10-08 it has 1 such level below the current price and 16 above. Levels like these describe where the price has reversed or paused before; they are not a forecast of where it will go. | -1.1% |
| All-time low | its lowest closing price on record is $3.25 (set on 2024-05-14) | $3.25 |
| Above the all-time low | it is 369.5% above its all-time low | +369.5% |
Volatility
5
| Band width vs its own 6 months | day-to-day price swings are unusually narrow versus its own recent history — a "Bollinger squeeze" (in the tightest 1% of the past ~6 months), which often precedes a bigger move | 1st percentile |
|---|---|---|
| Typical daily range | in a typical session it travels about $1.03 between its high and its low — about 6.7% of its price. That is its "average true range" over the last 14 sessions, which also counts the distance from the previous close, so a day that opens well away from yesterday counts as the large move it was | $1.03 |
| Bollinger bands (20-day, ±2σ) | most of its recent trading has stayed between about $14.97 and $17.46 — the "Bollinger bands", a range drawn two standard deviations either side of its 20-day average price, which widens when the stock gets more volatile and narrows when it settles | $14.97 – $16.21 – $17.46 |
| Typical daily range (% of price) | its price moves about 6.7% in a typical session — more volatile than most companies we cover. This is the average gap between a session's high and low over the last 14 sessions, counting overnight moves, expressed against the current price so it can be compared with companies trading at any price | 6.7% |
| Stretch from the 200-day average | it is trading 7.8 daily ranges below its 200-day average price (34.2% below it in plain percentage terms) — a way of asking how far it has stretched from its own average in units of how far it normally moves in a day, so a calm company and a jumpy one can be compared on the same scale | 7.8 daily ranges below its 200-day average |
Volume
1
| Volume vs its 30-day average | trading volume is about normal versus its 30-day average | 1.34× |
|---|
Analyst
2
| Change in the average price target | analysts' average price target is unchanged from the prior reading | 0.0% |
|---|---|---|
| Change in the consensus rating | the analyst consensus rating is unchanged since the prior reading | unchanged |
Candlestick patterns
1
| Since a doji | 1 session ago it opened and closed at almost the same price after trading through a wider range — a "doji", the classic picture of buyers and sellers finishing the session level | 1 session ago |
|---|
Price gaps
3
| Gap at the open | it opened on 2026-10-08 1.4% below the previous session's close — an overnight gap, the part of the move that happened while the market was shut, and had not traded back through that level by the close | -1.4% |
|---|---|---|
| Open gap | it gapped 3.1% below the previous close 1 session ago and has not traded back through the level it left behind at 16.49 — an "unfilled gap", which describes a price range no trade has since crossed and is not a forecast that it will be crossed | -3.1% |
| Gap filled | a 3.8% gap up opened on 2026-10-06 has been "filled" 1 session ago — price traded back through the level the gap left behind, and it took 1 session to close | 1 session ago |
Price streaks
1
| Closing streak | it has closed lower 2 sessions in a row, a -7.46% move over the run — an unbroken run of down days, which describes what has already happened and says nothing about the next session | 2 sessions down |
|---|
Relative strength
4
| vs market, 1 month | over the past 1 month this stock lagged the market by 22.2 percentage points (the stock lost 21.1% while the market gained 1.0%) | -22.2% |
|---|---|---|
| vs market, 3 months | over the past 3 months this stock lagged the market by 23.3 percentage points (the stock lost 19.5% while the market gained 3.8%) | -23.3% |
| vs market, 6 months | over the past 6 months this stock lagged the market by 46.5 percentage points (the stock lost 29.1% while the market gained 17.5%) | -46.5% |
| vs market, 12 months | over the past 12 months this stock lagged the market by 82.5 percentage points (the stock lost 67.6% while the market gained 15.0%) | -82.5% |
Signal agreement
2
| Bullish technical signals | 1 of the 9 technical signals we can compute for it is currently in a bullish state: near the bottom of its 14-day range (oversold) — these describe past price behaviour, not a forecast | 1 of 9 |
|---|---|---|
| Bearish technical signals | 6 of the 9 technical signals we can compute for it are currently in a bearish state: a "death cross" — its 50-day average is below its 200-day, trading below its 200-day average, a fresh 20-day low, MACD momentum is negative, lagging the market over 6 months, trading below the Ichimoku cloud — these describe past price behaviour, not a forecast | 6 of 9 |
Trend (Ichimoku cloud)
1
| Vs the Ichimoku cloud | trading 16% below the Ichimoku cloud — a band drawn from where its own highs and lows sat up to 2026-09-01 and projected forward over today's price, the side traders read as an established downtrend, with the band above acting as the level that would have to be cleared. The band itself is thick, spanning 23.1% of the share price, which is taken to mean a barrier that has held for a while and takes effort to cross. | -16.1% |
|---|
Volume-weighted price
2
| Vs this year’s average price paid | the price is 34% below the average price paid so far this year, so the typical buyer over that stretch is under water. That average is $23.24 — a volume-weighted average of daily closes over 190 sessions, not a true tick-by-tick VWAP. | -34.3% |
|---|---|---|
| Vs the average paid since it last reported | the price is 12% below the average price paid since it last reported on 2026-08-12 (its 10-Q), so the typical buyer over that stretch is under water. That average is $17.36 — a volume-weighted average of daily closes over 41 sessions, not a true tick-by-tick VWAP. | -12.1% |
Price levels it has turned at before
NNE last closed at $15.26 on 2026-10-08. Since 2024-10-08 it has turned at 1 price below its last close and 16 above; the nearest below and the 3 nearest above are listed, nearest first.
| Level | Side | Distance | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| $15.10 | Support | 1.1% below the last close | turned there twice · 2024-10-15 to 2026-09-16 |
| $17.14 | Resistance | 12.3% above the last close | turned there twice · 2025-04-21 to 2026-09-01 |
| $19.07 | Resistance | 25.0% above the last close | turned there three times · 2025-01-13 to 2026-03-30 |
| $19.57 | Resistance | 28.3% above the last close | turned there three times · 2024-11-15 to 2026-09-08 |
A level is a price this company reversed or paused at more than once — they describe past behaviour, not a forecast of where the price will go.
Wave structure
Its recent swings can be read as a five-part downward sequence — what Elliott-wave chartists call an impulse — now in leg 3 of five.
This labelling fails — stops being a possible reading at all — if it closes above $17.44.
This is one of several labellings that fit the same swings, so treat it as a reading rather than the reading. It was chosen from 2 labellings that survived the rules, counting shorter readings of the same bars.
On past moves of this shape the leg has usually ended somewhere between $10.05 and $12.87 — that is where it has tended to end if the count holds, not a forecast of where the price goes.
Alternate reading: The same swings also read as a three-part correction in leg C, which fails on a close above $17.44.
This reading has stood for 7 trading days, since 2026-09-30.
Read from daily closes as of 2026-10-08.
An Elliott-wave count describes the swings already printed and the level that would disprove it. It is not a forecast, a target, or advice.
Screens: Trading below the 200-day moving average · Pulled back from the 12-month high · Broke down to a new 20-day low · MACD just crossed bearish (12/26/9) · in a Bollinger Band volatility squeeze · trendless / choppy (low ADX) | Learn: moving average · golden cross · adx · rsi · macd · breakout · fifty two week high low · bollinger bands
Based on daily closing prices as of 2026-10-08. Describes past price behavior only — informational, not financial advice.
Analyst consensus
- Consensus ratingBuy (1.63 mean, 1=Strong Buy…5=Strong Sell) — 7 analysts
- Mean price target$37.57 range $22.00 – $50.00; median $45.00
Analyst estimates, as of 2026-10-04. These are third-party analyst opinions and price targets, aggregated — not a recommendation, prediction, or advice from stocks-llm. Informational only.
Analyst EPS estimate for NNE
- Consensus EPS estimate-$0.26 next reporting period, as of 2026-10-04
- Estimate change, 30 days-$0.00667 from -$0.2533, on 2026-08-30, 35-day window
- Readings revised upward13% of 8 comparable readings
The consensus estimate for the next reporting period, and how it has moved between readings of that SAME period. A change is measured only between readings estimating one period — when a company reports, the consensus moves to the next quarter and the two numbers are not comparable. Informational only, not a forecast and not advice.
Key risks (from latest filing)
["Highly speculative, early-stage business with significant regulatory and technical hurdles.","Dependence on complex nuclear regulatory approvals to achieve commercial viability.","Requirement for substantial additional capital to fund research, development, and eventual manufacturing."]
What changed in the latest 10-Q
AI-assisted comparison of NNE's 10-Q filed 2026-05-14 against the prior one filed 2026-02-17.
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
- Added:
- Newer filing (2026-05-14) specifies data periods as 'three and six months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025' versus older filing's 'three months ended December 31, 2025 and 2024'
- Newer filing describes company as 'nuclear energy and technology company' versus older filing's 'emerging nuclear energy company'
- Newer filing states accumulated deficit of approximately $73.5 million as of March 31, 2026 versus older filing's accumulated net losses of $64,017,136 through December 31, 2025
- Newer filing reports net loss of $9.2 million for three months ended March 31, 2026 and $15.7 million for six months ended March 31, 2026
- Newer filing includes specific announcement: 'On April 2, 2026, we issued a press release announcing the formal submission of the Construction Permit Application by The Grainger College of Engineering at the UIUC...to the NRC'
- Newer filing states KRONOS MMR reactor 'expected to be a full-scale system' and 'the NRC will be evaluating as part of its licensing process for the entire system'
- Newer filing references DOE LEU Acquisition Program with LIST as prime contractor and company as key subcontractor, announced in December 2024
- Removed:
- Older filing's statement that company 'is currently in the pre-revenue stage'
- Older filing's statement about developing 'a KRONOS MMR prototype at Chalk River Laboratories in Ontario, Canada'
- Older filing's statement that company 'own[s] the rights to the ODIN™ reactor, a portable modular low pressure coolant reactor, which we are currently in the process of selling'
- Older filing's detailed discussion of fuel supply chain activities including '$2 million strategic investment in...LIS Technologies Inc. (LIST)' and exploration of conversion facilities and uranium mining
- Reworded:
- Older: 'proprietary microreactor designs' changed to Newer: 'proprietary reactor designs' (broader scope)
- Older: 'contribute towards a sustainable future' changed to Newer: 'build the sustainable energy solutions of the future' (slightly different framing)
- Older: 'leading edge advanced nuclear microreactors' changed to Newer: 'cutting edge advanced nuclear microreactors'
- Older: 'with our principal focus centered on' changed to Newer: 'with our current principal allocation of time and capital resources directed toward' (more specific language)
- Older: 'stationary modular reactor' descriptor removed in Newer filing for KRONOS MMR
- Older: 'LOKI MMR™ reactor, a portable nuclear reactor designed for versatility in application and deployment which is also a HTGR' changed to Newer: 'LOKI MMR™ reactor, a portable nuclear reactor designed for versatility in application and deployment, and particularly utilized for space applications, which is also a HTGR'
- Older: 'the ZEUS™ reactor, a portable modular solid core battery reactor' changed to Newer: 'ZEUS™ reactor, a portable modular solid core battery reactor ideal for military applications'
- Older: 'significant majority of our time and resources' changed to Newer: 'substantial majority of time and resources'
- Older: 'we are seeking to develop' changed to Newer: 'we are also seeking to develop' (added 'also')
- Older description of HALEU references 'low-enriched uranium (LEU) and high-assay low-enriched uranium (HALEU)' changed to Newer's 'LEU and HALEU' (abbreviated in newer)
- Notes:
- The older filing text appears truncated at 'We have made a $2 million strategic investment in, and entered into a collaboration with, a laser-based uranium enrichment technology company, LIS Technologies Inc. ("LIST") (which is a related party), to support the development of their technology. Through this inv', which may affect completeness of comparison
- Different reporting periods between filings (Q1 vs Q2 fiscal periods) may explain some content differences beyond actual substantive changes
Risk Factors
- Added:
- Added 'aim,' and 'goal,' to the list of forward-looking statement identifier terms (filed 2026-05-14)
- Added 'derivatives of these terms' language to forward-looking statement identifier section (filed 2026-05-14)
- Added reference to 'Risk Factors' section in the final forward-looking statements disclaimer paragraph (filed 2026-05-14)
- Added 'or incorporated by reference' language in the final risk factor bullet point (filed 2026-05-14)
- Removed:
- Removed 'or the negative of those terms' from forward-looking statement identifier language (older filing 2026-02-17 included this phrase; newer filing 2026-05-14 does not)
- Removed reference to 'Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations' standing alone; now coupled with 'Risk Factors' (filed 2026-05-14)
- Reworded:
- Changed 'other products, technologies or services we are developing' to 'the power from our reactors, other products, technologies or services we are developing' in first risk factor bullet (filed 2026-05-14)
- Changed 'fuel supply chain' to 'fuel and material supply chain' in second risk factor bullet (filed 2026-05-14)
- Changed 'nuclear service support' to 'nuclear technical support' in fourth risk factor bullet (filed 2026-05-14)
- Changed 'expanding and resurgent' to 'resurgent and expanding' in fourth risk factor bullet (filed 2026-05-14)
- Changed 'nuclear regulatory regimes impacting our several business lines in the jurisdictions we operate' to 'nuclear regulatory regimes in the jurisdictions we operate' in eighth risk factor bullet (filed 2026-05-14)
- Changed 'rapidly evolving and complex industry' to 'rapidly evolving, complex and highly competitive industry' in ninth risk factor bullet (filed 2026-05-14)
- Notes:
- The newer filing includes financial statements dated March 31, 2026, while the older filing includes financial statements dated December 31, 2025. The Risk Factors section comparison is limited to the narrative disclosure sections; financial data is different periods and not directly comparable.
AI-assisted comparison of two SEC filing sections. It describes wording and theme changes only, makes no materiality, legal, or investment judgement, and is not financial advice. Informational only — not financial advice.
Insider activity (SEC Form 4)
0 open-market purchases and 4 open-market sales by insiders in the last 90 days, of which we have read Form 4 filings through 2026-10-04. The 5 days since 2026-10-04 have not been checked yet.
- Last 90 days · read to 2026-10-040 buys · 4 sells ($9M) — 2 selling insiders
- Last 180 days · read to 2026-10-040 buys · 48 sells ($52M) — 7 selling insiders
Activity heuristic: net selling (a transparent product heuristic from the counts above, not a prediction or advice)
Most recent open-market transaction: 2026-09-03. Based on Form 4 filings read through 2026-10-04; anything filed since is not yet included.
View full insider trading history → View SEC Form 3/4/5 filingsAsk about NNE's insider activity →
Only open-market purchases (SEC code P) and sales (code S) are counted here. Option exercises, vesting/awards, gifts, and shares withheld for taxes are excluded — they are compensation or mechanical, not open-market conviction. Sales may be planned and non-discretionary (e.g. a Rule 10b5-1 plan) and are not necessarily bearish; open-market buying is not a recommendation to buy. Informational only — not financial advice.
Institutional ownership (13F)
4 institutional 13F filers reported holding NNE as of 2026-06-30 (quarter-end position, filed within 45 days).
- Distinct 13F filers 4
- Reported shares held 7,357,347
- Reported value $155,534,315
reported quarterly holdings change (2026-03-31 → 2026-06-30): 0 new, 4 increased, 0 decreased, 0 exited. Change counts cover only managers that filed 13F reports in BOTH quarters, derived between two quarter-end snapshots — not same-day trades; a single manager is never said to have "bought" or "sold".
Institutional holdings are quarter-end long positions reported on SEC Form 13F-HR, filed up to 45 days after the quarter ends — they are delayed, are not real-time trades, exclude short positions and most non-US securities, and are not investment advice. Any increase/decrease is a reported change between two quarterly snapshots, not a same-day purchase or sale. These are quarter-end snapshots from the 13F filings on SEC EDGAR, filed within 45 days — not real-time, and any change is a difference between two quarterly reports, not a same-day trade. Informational only — not financial advice.
Ask about NNE's institutional holders → See what each manager we track holds →
Short interest (FINRA)
NNE had 15,458,223 shares of reported short interest as of the 2026-09-15 FINRA settlement date (delayed, bi-monthly; not real-time).
NNE had 28.8% of its shares outstanding sold short as of the 2026-09-15 FINRA settlement date (percent of FLOAT would be higher — float is not disclosed in the source). FINRA reported 9.77 days to cover at the same settlement.
- Reported short interest (shares) 15,458,223
- Short interest (% of shares outstanding) 28.8%
- Prior settlement (shares) 14,950,361
- Reported change 3.4%
- Days to cover (reported) 9.77
Reported to FINRA as of the 2026-09-15 settlement date. Short interest is reported to FINRA and published on a delayed, bi-monthly schedule (as of a settlement date, disseminated roughly eight business days later) — it is NOT real-time, does not cover every venue or all US trading, and is not a short-squeeze prediction or investment advice. Days-to-cover is the value FINRA reports; percent of float is not shown because the source file carries no share-count denominator — where a percent appears it is of shares OUTSTANDING, the larger base, and is therefore a floor on percent of float. Informational only — not financial advice.
Competitors & peers
- NuScale Power (SMR)
- BWX Technologies (BWXT)
- TerraPower (Private)
- Oklo (OKLO)
- Westinghouse Electric Company (Private)
AI-enriched competitor set. Linked names are companies covered by stocks-llm; other named peers are shown for reference only.
Compare NNE vs…
Frequently asked questions
What does NANO NUCLEAR ENERGY INC (NNE) do?
Nano Nuclear Energy is an early-stage company focused on the development of advanced nuclear microreactors and associated nuclear energy technologies. The company is also building a business around nuclear fuel supply chain capabilities, specialized nuclear material transportation, and technical consultancy services for the nuclear industry.
What sector is NANO NUCLEAR ENERGY INC (NNE) in?
NANO NUCLEAR ENERGY INC (NNE) is classified in the Industrials sector. Its industry is Nuclear Energy / Advanced Reactor Technology. It trades on NASDAQ.
Who are NANO NUCLEAR ENERGY INC's (NNE) competitors?
Notable peers of NANO NUCLEAR ENERGY INC (NNE) include NuScale Power, BWX Technologies, TerraPower (Private), Oklo and Westinghouse Electric Company (Private). This peer set is informational only — not financial advice.
Is NANO NUCLEAR ENERGY INC (NNE) overbought or oversold right now?
NANO NUCLEAR ENERGY INC (NNE) is currently neither overbought nor oversold — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 40, in the neutral middle (as of 2026-10-08). RSI describes recent price momentum, not a forecast — informational only, not financial advice.
Where does stocks-llm's data on NNE come from?
Fundamentals come from SEC XBRL company filings for the figures marked with a fiscal year, and market data, as of 2026-09-03 for the rest; prices are market data, as of 2026-09-03; company filings and profile facts come from SEC EDGAR. All figures are delayed daily-close data shown with their as-of date — informational only, not financial advice.
Fundamentals: SEC XBRL company filings for the figures marked with a fiscal year, and market data, as of 2026-09-03 for the rest. Filings: SEC EDGAR. Prices are delayed daily-close data.
Last updated 2026-10-08.
Informational only — NOT financial advice. All figures are delayed daily-close data from SEC EDGAR & market data, shown with their as-of date.