ENERGY VAULT HOLDINGS INC (NRGV)
Industrials · Energy storage systems and solutions · NYSE
Energy Vault is an energy infrastructure provider building and operating utility-scale storage solutions that combine gravity, battery, and hydrogen technologies with AI-driven energy management software.
What ENERGY VAULT HOLDINGS INC does
Energy Vault Holdings develops, integrates, and operates a diversified portfolio of energy storage solutions, including proprietary gravity-based storage, battery energy storage systems (BESS), and green hydrogen-based technologies. The company is transitioning from a project delivery model to an 'Own & Operate' strategy, where it develops and manages energy infrastructure assets supported by its proprietary VaultOS energy management software. It provides these solutions to utilities, independent power producers, and large energy users across global markets.
Themes: Energy storage solutions, Battery energy storage systems (BESS), Grid-scale energy storage, Energy management software, Renewable energy infrastructure, Green hydrogen, Microgrid and resilience, Owned and operated projects
Fundamentals
- Price$3.80 as of 2026-08-21 close
- Market cap$691M as of 2026-08-21
- 1-year return+136.0% 2025-08-21 close $1.61 → 2026-08-21 close $3.80
- P/En/a negative earnings
- Net margin-48.6% as of 2026-08-24
- Gross margin+22.5% as of 2026-08-24
- ROE-236.7% as of 2026-08-24
- Debt / equity35.29 as of 2026-08-24
- Revenue growth (YoY)+340.9% FY2025 vs FY2024, SEC XBRL
- Revenue CAGR (3y)+11.8% SEC XBRL
- Beta1.32 as of 2026-08-24
- Last reported earnings2026-08-11 SEC EDGAR Form 8-K (Item 2.02)
How NRGV compares in its sector
- net profit marginbottom 10% 457 covered Industrials peers, as of 2026-08-24
- operating marginbottom 10% 457 covered Industrials peers, as of 2026-08-24
- gross marginmiddle range 455 covered Industrials peers, as of 2026-08-24
- return on equitybottom 10% 460 covered Industrials peers, as of 2026-08-24
- 3-year revenue CAGRmiddle range 426 covered Industrials peers
- free cash flow (absolute dollars, latest fiscal year)bottom 25% 414 covered Industrials peers, as of FY2025
Position among covered Industrials companies that report each metric (minimum 5 peers). A relative position within our covered catalog — not a valuation, quality, or investment judgment. A higher percentile is simply a higher value (for P/E, more expensive on earnings — never "better"). Informational only.
How ENERGY VAULT HOLDINGS INC looks technically
ENERGY VAULT HOLDINGS INC (NRGV) is trading 6.2% below its 200-day average, the long-term trend line — a long-term downtrend. Its 50-day average crossed below its 200-day average about 13 trading days ago — a "death cross", a bearish long-term signal. There is no clear trend right now — the price is choppy (ADX, a 0–100 trend-strength gauge, is 19, below the 25 that marks a real trend), though buyers have been pushing harder than sellers lately — pressure, not a trend. Momentum is neutral — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 55, neither overbought (above 70) nor oversold (below 30). It made a new 20-day high about 8 trading days ago. It is 40.6% below its highest point of the past year. Trading volume is unusually light — only about 48% of its 30-day average.
Trend
8
| Distance from the 200-day | it is trading 6.2% below its 200-day average, the long-term trend line — a long-term downtrend | -6.2% |
|---|---|---|
| 50-day moving average | its average price over the last 50 trading days — a short-term trend line — is $3.63 | $3.63 |
| 200-day moving average | its average price over the last 200 trading days — the long-term trend line — is $4.05 | $4.05 |
| Swing structure | each recent peak has been lower than the one before it and each dip deeper — the pattern chart-watchers call a downtrend, which describes where price has already been and not where it goes next | lower highs and lower lows |
| Last swing turn | its last significant turn was a swing high 9 calendar days ago — the swings before that are what the structure reading is measured on | 9 sessions |
| Wave structure | its recent swings can be read as a five-part downward sequence — what Elliott-wave chartists call an impulse — now in leg 3 of five; the labelling fails if price closes above 4.19. It is one of several labellings that fit, and it describes the swings already printed, not what comes next. The same swings also read as a three-part correction in leg C. | possible downward five-wave sequence, in wave 3 (one of several readings) |
| Since the 50/200 cross | its 50-day average crossed below its 200-day average about 13 trading days ago — a "death cross", a bearish long-term signal | 13 sessions |
| Trend strength (14-day ADX) | there is no clear trend right now — the price is choppy (ADX, a 0–100 trend-strength gauge, is 19, below the 25 that marks a real trend), though buyers have been pushing harder than sellers lately — pressure, not a trend | 19.2 |
Momentum
3
| 14-day RSI | momentum is neutral — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 55, neither overbought (above 70) nor oversold (below 30) | 55.3 |
|---|---|---|
| Position in its 14-day range | it is trading in the upper half of its 14-day range ($2.86 to $4.19) — its "stochastic" reading is 71 out of 100, where 0 would mean closing exactly at the 14-session low and 100 exactly at the high. This measures WHERE the price sits inside its recent range, which is a different question from the RSI beside it: RSI is a momentum gauge, measuring how FAST the price has been moving, so a stock can drift quietly to the bottom of its range with an ordinary RSI, or fall sharply and still sit in the middle. It has been slipping within that range over the last few sessions. | 70.7 |
| Since the MACD crossed zero | MACD, a trend-momentum gauge, is in positive territory (momentum leaning bullish) | 15 sessions |
Range
12
| 52-week high | its highest closing price over the past year (about 252 trading days) was $6.40 | $6.40 |
|---|---|---|
| From the 52-week high | it is 40.6% below its 52-week high (its highest price of the past year) | -40.6% |
| Above the 52-week low | it is 171.4% above its 52-week low (its lowest price of the past year) | +171.4% |
| Below the 52-week high | it is 40.6% below its highest point of the past year | 40.6% |
| Since a 20-day breakout | it made a new 20-day high about 8 trading days ago | 8 sessions |
| Since a 55-day breakout | it made a new 55-day low about 18 trading days ago | 18 sessions |
| All-time high | its highest closing price on record is $22.10 (set on 2022-04-05) | $22.10 |
| Given back of the 52-week move | over the past year its closes ranged ($1.44 to $6.14), and it has given back around half of its rise from last year’s low — 50% of it. Chart-watchers call 61.8%-65% given back the "golden pocket" — for this company that is $3.08 to $3.24. It is watched widely enough that orders cluster there, which is the honest reason it matters; it is not a forecast. | 49.8% |
| From the all-time high | it is 82.8% below its all-time high | -82.8% |
| Nearest price level | it is trading 0.8% above a support level at $3.77 — a price it turned at three times since 2026-05-06, most recently on 2026-07-22. Since 2024-08-21 it has 10 such levels below the current price and 3 above. Levels like these describe where the price has reversed or paused before; they are not a forecast of where it will go. | -0.8% |
| All-time low | its lowest closing price on record is $0.596 (set on 2025-04-21) | $0.596 |
| Above the all-time low | it is 537.6% above its all-time low | +537.6% |
Volatility
5
| Band width vs its own 6 months | day-to-day price swings are wider than usual versus its own recent 6-month history (wider than about 71% of it) | 71st percentile |
|---|---|---|
| Typical daily range | in a typical session it travels about $0.345 between its high and its low — about 9.1% of its price. That is its "average true range" over the last 14 sessions, which also counts the distance from the previous close, so a day that opens well away from yesterday counts as the large move it was | $0.345 |
| Bollinger bands (20-day, ±2σ) | most of its recent trading has stayed between about $2.47 and $4.21 — the "Bollinger bands", a range drawn two standard deviations either side of its 20-day average price, which widens when the stock gets more volatile and narrows when it settles | $2.47 – $3.34 – $4.21 |
| Typical daily range (% of price) | its price moves about 9.1% in a typical session — among the most volatile in the catalog. This is the average gap between a session's high and low over the last 14 sessions, counting overnight moves, expressed against the current price so it can be compared with companies trading at any price | 9.1% |
| Stretch from the 200-day average | it is trading 0.7 daily ranges below its 200-day average price (6.2% below it in plain percentage terms) — a way of asking how far it has stretched from its own average in units of how far it normally moves in a day, so a calm company and a jumpy one can be compared on the same scale | 0.7 daily ranges below its 200-day average |
Volume
1
| Volume vs its 30-day average | trading volume is unusually light — only about 48% of its 30-day average | 0.48× |
|---|
Analyst
2
| Change in the average price target | analysts have raised their average price target by 12.2% since the prior reading | +12.2% |
|---|---|---|
| Change in the consensus rating | the analyst consensus rating is unchanged since the prior reading | unchanged |
Candlestick patterns
1
| Since a doji | today it opened and closed at almost the same price after trading through a wider range — a "doji", the classic picture of buyers and sellers finishing the session level | today |
|---|
Price gaps
3
| Gap at the open | it opened on 2026-08-21 1.3% above the previous session's close — an overnight gap, the part of the move that happened while the market was shut, and traded back through that level before the close | +1.3% |
|---|---|---|
| Open gap | it gapped 3.9% above the previous close 8 sessions ago and has not traded back through the level it left behind at 3.34 — an "unfilled gap", which describes a price range no trade has since crossed and is not a forecast that it will be crossed | +3.9% |
| Gap filled | a 4.7% gap down opened on 2026-08-18 has been "filled" 2 sessions ago — price traded back through the level the gap left behind, and it took 1 session to close | 2 sessions ago |
Price streaks
1
| Closing streak | it closed higher in its latest session, after a session that did not close higher — a single up day rather than a run | 1 session up |
|---|
Relative strength
4
| vs market, 1 month | over the past 1 month this stock beat the market by 6.9 percentage points (the stock gained 9.2% while the market gained 2.3%) | +6.9% |
|---|---|---|
| vs market, 3 months | over the past 3 months this stock lagged the market by 27.6 percentage points (the stock lost 24.5% while the market gained 3.1%) | -27.6% |
| vs market, 6 months | over the past 6 months this stock beat the market by 13.1 percentage points (the stock gained 24.2% while the market gained 11.1%) | +13.1% |
| vs market, 12 months | over the past 12 months this stock beat the market by 115.5 percentage points (the stock gained 136.0% while the market gained 20.5%) | +115.5% |
Signal agreement
2
| Bullish technical signals | 2 of the 9 technical signals we can compute for it are currently in a bullish state: MACD momentum is positive, outperforming the market over 6 months — these describe past price behaviour, not a forecast | 2 of 9 |
|---|---|---|
| Bearish technical signals | 3 of the 9 technical signals we can compute for it are currently in a bearish state: a "death cross" — its 50-day average is below its 200-day, trading below its 200-day average, trading below the Ichimoku cloud — these describe past price behaviour, not a forecast | 3 of 9 |
Trend (Ichimoku cloud)
1
| Vs the Ichimoku cloud | trading 8.8% below the Ichimoku cloud — a band drawn from where its own highs and lows sat up to 2026-07-16 and projected forward over today's price, the side traders read as an established downtrend, with the band above acting as the level that would have to be cleared. The band itself is thick, spanning 14.0% of the share price, which is taken to mean a barrier that has held for a while and takes effort to cross. | -8.8% |
|---|
Volume-weighted price
1
| Vs this year’s average price paid | the price is 7% below the average price paid so far this year, so the typical buyer over that stretch is under water. That average is $4.08 — a volume-weighted average of daily closes over 157 sessions, not a true tick-by-tick VWAP. | -6.8% |
|---|
Price levels it has turned at before
NRGV last closed at $3.80 on 2026-08-21. Since 2024-08-21 it has turned at 10 prices below its last close and 3 above; the 3 nearest below and the 3 nearest above are listed, nearest first.
| Level | Side | Distance | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| $3.77 | Support | 0.8% below the last close | turned there three times · 2026-05-06 to 2026-07-22 |
| $3.54 | Support | 6.8% below the last close | turned there three times · 2025-09-23 to 2026-03-04 |
| $4.42 | Resistance | 16.3% above the last close | turned there twice · 2026-01-02 to 2026-05-19 |
| $3.13 | Support | 17.8% below the last close | turned there twice · 2025-10-30 to 2026-03-18 |
| $4.87 | Resistance | 28.0% above the last close | turned there twice · 2025-11-11 to 2026-06-30 |
| $6.35 | Resistance | 67.1% above the last close | turned there three times · 2026-01-15 to 2026-06-05 |
A level is a price this company reversed or paused at more than once — they describe past behaviour, not a forecast of where the price will go.
Wave structure
Its recent swings can be read as a five-part downward sequence — what Elliott-wave chartists call an impulse — now in leg 3 of five.
This labelling fails — stops being a possible reading at all — if it closes above $4.19.
This is one of several labellings that fit the same swings, so treat it as a reading rather than the reading. It was chosen from 2 labellings that survived the rules, counting shorter readings of the same bars.
On past moves of this shape the leg has usually ended somewhere between $0.3392 and $1.81 — that is where it has tended to end if the count holds, not a forecast of where the price goes.
Alternate reading: The same swings also read as a three-part correction in leg C, which fails on a close above $4.19.
This reading has stood for 3 trading days, since 2026-08-19.
Read from daily closes as of 2026-08-21.
An Elliott-wave count describes the swings already printed and the level that would disprove it. It is not a forecast, a target, or advice.
Screens: Trading below the 200-day moving average · Recent death cross (50-day crossed below 200-day) · Pulled back from the 12-month high · trendless / choppy (low ADX) · Analyst price target recently RAISED · beating the market | Learn: moving average · golden cross · adx · rsi · breakout · fifty two week high low · volume and relative volume
Based on daily closing prices as of 2026-08-21. Describes past price behavior only — informational, not financial advice.
Analyst consensus
- Consensus ratingBuy (1.80 mean, 1=Strong Buy…5=Strong Sell) — 5 analysts
- Mean price target$6.21 range $3.00 – $8.03; median $7.00
Analyst estimates, as of 2026-08-23. These are third-party analyst opinions and price targets, aggregated — not a recommendation, prediction, or advice from stocks-llm. Informational only.
Analyst EPS estimate for NRGV
- Consensus EPS estimate-$0.1304 next reporting period, as of 2026-08-23
Change over time is not available yet: it needs two readings of the same reporting period at least 30 days apart, and we have been recording these estimates since 2026-08-04. An estimate for a DIFFERENT quarter is not a revision, so a reading from before the last report is never compared with one after it.
The consensus estimate for the next reporting period, and how it has moved between readings of that SAME period. A change is measured only between readings estimating one period — when a company reports, the consensus moves to the next quarter and the two numbers are not comparable. Informational only, not a forecast and not advice.
Key risks (from latest filing)
["Technology commercialization risk: investments in development projects may not achieve commercial operations in predicted timeframes or at all, and unproven business models including owned and operated projects carry execution risk","Capital and funding risk: the company is unprofitable with significant negative net margins (-52.97%) and requires substantial capital for operations and future growth","Macroeconomic and policy risk: exposure to changes in government regulations, tax laws, international trade policies and tariffs, and dependence on clean energy tax credits under the Inflation Reduction Act"]
What changed in the latest 10-Q
AI-assisted comparison of NRGV's 10-Q filed 2026-05-19 against the prior one filed 2025-11-10.
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
- Added:
- Reference to 2025 Annual Report filed March 18, 2026 (newer filing references year ended December 31, 2025)
- Description of Energy Vault as 'integrated power infrastructure platform' that 'builds, owns and operates' systems (newer emphasizes ownership model)
- Specific mention of 'artificial intelligence and data center market' as customer segment (newer filing)
- Description of 'technology-agnostic, software-enabled architecture' as core platform feature (newer filing)
- February 4, 2025 tariff imposition date and subsequent March 4, 2025 increase under IEEPA (newer provides fuller timeline)
- April 2025 reciprocal duties announcement and April 10, 2025 escalation to higher levels (newer specifies timing)
- Mid-May 2025 tariff reductions and pauses announcement (newer filing)
- November 2025 executive actions reducing IEEPA fentanyl duty and extending reciprocal duty framework through November 10, 2026 (newer filing)
- February 20, 2026 U.S. Supreme Court decision invalidating IEEPA-based tariffs (newer filing)
- President Trump's 10% import surcharge under Section 122 of Trade Act of 1974, scheduled to expire July 2026 (newer filing)
- Reference to core metals used in grid-scale infrastructure as affected by new tariffs (newer filing)
- Discussion of China's export control measures on graphite-related materials (newer filing adds detail)
- Acknowledgment that full scope, duration, and economic impact of new tariffs remain uncertain (newer filing)
- Removed:
- Reference to 2024 Annual Report filed April 1, 2025 (older filing)
- Description of Energy Vault providing 'diverse technology portfolio' including 'proprietary gravity, battery, and green hydrogen' technologies (older emphasis)
- Reference to 'build-and-transfer model or licensing model' as historical business approach (older filing)
- Statement about 2024 transition to taking 'ownership interest in energy storage assets' (older filing)
- Customer-centric, solutions-based approach language and mission statement about renewable energy transition (older filing)
- Specific cumulative tariff rate of '155.9%' on B-Vault products (older provided exact figure)
- May 12, 2025 announcement date of 90-day tariff pause (older filing)
- May 14, 2025 effective date of temporary suspension (older filing)
- August 12, 2025 extension agreement announcement (older filing)
- Specific tariff rates during suspension period: 'approximately 30%' versus 'approximately 145%' (older filing had specifics)
- Chinese retaliatory tariff of 'approximate 10%' on U.S. goods (older filing)
- May 28, 2025 U.S. Court of International Trade ruling and appeal information (older filing)
- November 5, 2025 Supreme Court oral arguments date and expected end-of-2025 ruling timeline (older filing)
- October 2025 China export-control announcement effective November 8, 2025 on battery cells, graphite, and equipment (older filing)
- Reworded:
- Business description changed from providing 'technology portfolio' to 'integrated power infrastructure platform that builds, owns and operates'
- Changed from 'proprietary gravity, battery, and green hydrogen' to 'short-, long-, and multi-day duration storage'
- Changed from describing transition 'from providing this technology portfolio solely to third parties' to integrated model language
- Tariff section restructured to present chronological developments rather than static snapshot of April 2025 conditions
- Changed emphasis from specific historical tariff percentages to forward-looking uncertainty about 'cumulative duty burdens'
- Changed from pending Supreme Court decision (scheduled November 5, 2025) to completed Supreme Court decision (February 20, 2026)
- Added discussion of Section 122 Trade Act surcharge as alternative tariff mechanism after IEEPA invalidation
- Notes:
- Older filing text ends mid-sentence ('sel') making full comparison of closing statements impossible
- Newer filing discusses events through February 20, 2026, while older filing references developments through October-November 2025, reflecting natural progression of time between filings
- The two filings cover different fiscal quarters (Q1 2026 versus Q3 2025) and therefore reflect different business conditions and regulatory environments
Risk Factors
- Added:
- Added bullet point in newer filing (2026-05-19) regarding 'our efforts to diversify our supply chain to lessen the impact of tariffs and global disruptions to maritime traffic' with expanded scope to include global disruptions to maritime traffic
- Added reference to Item 1A Risk Factors on page 52 in newer filing (2026-05-19), whereas older filing (2025-11-10) referenced page 57
- Removed:
- Removed abbreviations '(OBBBA)' and '(IRA)' and '(the "JOBS Act")' from newer filing (2026-05-19); older filing (2025-11-10) included parenthetical abbreviations for One Big Beautiful Bill Act, Inflation Reduction Act, and Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act
- Reworded:
- Changed reference from 'Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended' in newer filing (2026-05-19) to 'U.S. tax code' in older filing (2025-11-10)
- Changed reference from '2025 Annual Report on Form 10-K' in newer filing (2026-05-19) to '2024 Annual Report on Form 10-K' in older filing (2025-11-10)
- Expanded language regarding supply chain diversification from 'lessen the impact of tariffs' in older filing (2025-11-10) to 'lessen the impact of tariffs and global disruptions to maritime traffic' in newer filing (2026-05-19)
- Notes:
- Balance sheet data and dates differ between filings (March 31, 2026 vs. September 30, 2025 and December 31, 2024 comparatives), but the comparison focuses only on the Risk Factors/Forward-Looking Statements section text as specified
- The provided text is truncated at the Balance Sheets section, so actual Risk Factors Item 1A content was not included for comparison; analysis is based on the Cautionary Note and surrounding disclosure text
AI-assisted comparison of two SEC filing sections. It describes wording and theme changes only, makes no materiality, legal, or investment judgement, and is not financial advice. Informational only — not financial advice.
Insider activity (SEC Form 4)
0 open-market purchases and 1 open-market sale by insiders in the last 90 days.
- Last 90 days0 buys · 1 sell ($265200) — 1 selling insider
- Last 180 days0 buys · 2 sells ($471900) — 1 selling insider
Activity heuristic: net selling (a transparent product heuristic from the counts above, not a prediction or advice)
Most recent open-market transaction: 2026-07-06. As of 2026-08-24.
View full insider trading history → View SEC Form 3/4/5 filingsAsk about NRGV's insider activity →
Only open-market purchases (SEC code P) and sales (code S) are counted here. Option exercises, vesting/awards, gifts, and shares withheld for taxes are excluded — they are compensation or mechanical, not open-market conviction. Sales may be planned and non-discretionary (e.g. a Rule 10b5-1 plan) and are not necessarily bearish; open-market buying is not a recommendation to buy. Informational only — not financial advice.
Institutional ownership (13F)
5 institutional 13F filers reported holding NRGV as of 2026-03-31 (quarter-end position, filed within 45 days).
- Distinct 13F filers 5
- Reported shares held 9,392,663
- Reported value $30,995,789
reported quarterly holdings change (2025-12-31 → 2026-03-31): 0 new, 3 increased, 2 decreased, 0 exited. Change counts cover only managers that filed 13F reports in BOTH quarters, derived between two quarter-end snapshots — not same-day trades; a single manager is never said to have "bought" or "sold".
Institutional holdings are quarter-end long positions reported on SEC Form 13F-HR, filed up to 45 days after the quarter ends — they are delayed, are not real-time trades, exclude short positions and most non-US securities, and are not investment advice. Any increase/decrease is a reported change between two quarterly snapshots, not a same-day purchase or sale. These are quarter-end snapshots from the 13F filings on SEC EDGAR, filed within 45 days — not real-time, and any change is a difference between two quarterly reports, not a same-day trade. Informational only — not financial advice.
Short interest (FINRA)
NRGV had 31,584,215 shares of reported short interest as of the 2026-07-31 FINRA settlement date (delayed, bi-monthly; not real-time).
NRGV had 17.4% of its shares outstanding sold short as of the 2026-07-31 FINRA settlement date (percent of FLOAT would be higher — float is not disclosed in the source). FINRA reported 7.64 days to cover at the same settlement.
- Reported short interest (shares) 31,584,215
- Short interest (% of shares outstanding) 17.4%
- Prior settlement (shares) 30,651,047
- Reported change 3.04%
- Days to cover (reported) 7.64
Reported to FINRA as of the 2026-07-31 settlement date. Short interest is reported to FINRA and published on a delayed, bi-monthly schedule (as of a settlement date, disseminated roughly eight business days later) — it is NOT real-time, does not cover every venue or all US trading, and is not a short-squeeze prediction or investment advice. Days-to-cover is the value FINRA reports; percent of float is not shown because the source file carries no share-count denominator — where a percent appears it is of shares OUTSTANDING, the larger base, and is therefore a floor on percent of float. Informational only — not financial advice.
Competitors & peers
- Fluence Energy
- Eos Energy Enterprises
- Form Energy
- Saft (part of TotalEnergies)
- Northvolt
- Tesla Energy
AI-enriched competitor set. Linked names are companies covered by stocks-llm; other named peers are shown for reference only.
Compare NRGV vs…
ENERGY VAULT HOLDINGS INC is found in…
Frequently asked questions
What does ENERGY VAULT HOLDINGS INC (NRGV) do?
Energy Vault Holdings develops, integrates, and operates a diversified portfolio of energy storage solutions, including proprietary gravity-based storage, battery energy storage systems (BESS), and green hydrogen-based technologies. The company is transitioning from a project delivery model to an 'Own & Operate' strategy, where it develops and manages energy infrastructure assets supported by its proprietary VaultOS energy management software.
What sector is ENERGY VAULT HOLDINGS INC (NRGV) in?
ENERGY VAULT HOLDINGS INC (NRGV) is classified in the Industrials sector. Its industry is Energy storage systems and solutions. It trades on NYSE.
Who are ENERGY VAULT HOLDINGS INC's (NRGV) competitors?
Notable peers of ENERGY VAULT HOLDINGS INC (NRGV) include Fluence Energy, Eos Energy Enterprises, Form Energy, Saft (part of TotalEnergies) and Northvolt. This peer set is informational only — not financial advice.
Is ENERGY VAULT HOLDINGS INC (NRGV) overbought or oversold right now?
ENERGY VAULT HOLDINGS INC (NRGV) is currently neither overbought nor oversold — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 55, in the neutral middle (as of 2026-08-21). RSI describes recent price momentum, not a forecast — informational only, not financial advice.
Where does stocks-llm's data on NRGV come from?
Fundamentals and prices come from market data, as of 2026-08-24; company filings and profile facts come from SEC EDGAR. All figures are delayed daily-close data shown with their as-of date — informational only, not financial advice.
Fundamentals: market data, as of 2026-08-24. Filings: SEC EDGAR. Prices are delayed daily-close data.
Last updated 2026-08-21.
Informational only — NOT financial advice. All figures are delayed daily-close data from SEC EDGAR & market data, shown with their as-of date.