THREDUP INC CLASS A (TDUP)
Consumer Discretionary · Online fashion resale and secondhand marketplace · NASDAQ
ThredUp is one of the world's largest online resale platforms for apparel, shoes and accessories, powered by proprietary processing infrastructure and AI-driven data science.
What THREDUP INC CLASS A does
ThredUp operates a managed online resale marketplace for apparel, shoes and accessories where sellers ship items in prepaid "Clean Out Bags" for processing and resale, while buyers browse millions of unique items at steep discounts. The company's custom-built platform combines distributed processing infrastructure, proprietary software systems, and data science expertise to handle single-SKU logistics at scale. Beyond its core marketplace, ThredUp offers Resale-as-a-Service (RaaS) to major brands and retailers seeking to offer closet clean-out and resale services to their customers.
Themes: secondhand / resale fashion, online marketplace, circular economy / sustainable fashion, AI-powered shopping experience, logistics automation
Fundamentals
- Price$2.81 as of 2026-08-24 close
- Market cap$416M as of 2026-08-24
- 1-year return-75.9% 2025-08-22 close $11.68 → 2026-08-24 close $2.81
- P/En/a negative earnings
- Net margin-6.7% as of 2026-08-24
- Gross margin+79.5% as of 2026-08-24
- ROE-37.3% as of 2026-08-24
- Debt / equity0.29 as of 2026-08-24
- Revenue growth (YoY)+33.9% as of 2026-08-24
- Revenue CAGR (3y)+2.5% SEC XBRL
- Beta1.36 as of 2026-08-24
- Last reported earnings2026-08-05 SEC EDGAR Form 8-K (Item 2.02)
How TDUP compares in its sector
- net profit marginbottom 25% 334 covered Consumer Discretionary peers, as of 2026-08-24
- operating marginbottom 10% 334 covered Consumer Discretionary peers, as of 2026-08-24
- gross margintop 10% 331 covered Consumer Discretionary peers, as of 2026-08-24
- return on equitybottom 25% 334 covered Consumer Discretionary peers, as of 2026-08-24
- 3-year revenue CAGRmiddle range 325 covered Consumer Discretionary peers
- free cash flow (absolute dollars, latest fiscal year)bottom 25% 311 covered Consumer Discretionary peers, as of FY2025
Position among covered Consumer Discretionary companies that report each metric (minimum 5 peers). A relative position within our covered catalog — not a valuation, quality, or investment judgment. A higher percentile is simply a higher value (for P/E, more expensive on earnings — never "better"). Informational only.
How THREDUP INC CLASS A looks technically
THREDUP INC CLASS A (TDUP) is trading 47.3% below its 200-day average, the long-term trend line — a long-term downtrend. Its 50-day average crossed above its 200-day average about 16 trading days ago — a "golden cross", a bullish long-term signal. A strong downtrend is in place — ADX, a 0–100 trend-strength gauge, is 43, with sellers in control. Momentum is beaten down — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 25, in oversold territory (below 30). It made a new 20-day low about 3 trading days ago. It is 4.5% above its 52-week low (its lowest price of the past year).
Trend
8
| Distance from the 200-day | it is trading 47.3% below its 200-day average, the long-term trend line — a long-term downtrend | -47.3% |
|---|---|---|
| 50-day moving average | its average price over the last 50 trading days — a short-term trend line — is $5.39 | $5.39 |
| 200-day moving average | its average price over the last 200 trading days — the long-term trend line — is $5.33 | $5.33 |
| Swing structure | each recent peak has been lower than the one before it and each dip deeper — the pattern chart-watchers call a downtrend, which describes where price has already been and not where it goes next | lower highs and lower lows |
| Last swing turn | its last significant turn was a swing high 19 calendar days ago — the swings before that are what the structure reading is measured on | 19 sessions |
| Wave structure | its recent swings can be read as a five-part downward sequence — what Elliott-wave chartists call an impulse — now in leg 3 of five; the labelling fails if price closes above 6.445. It is one of several labellings that fit, and it describes the swings already printed, not what comes next. The same swings also read as a three-part correction in leg C. | possible downward five-wave sequence, in wave 3 (one of several readings) |
| Since the 50/200 cross | its 50-day average crossed above its 200-day average about 16 trading days ago — a "golden cross", a bullish long-term signal | 16 sessions |
| Trend strength (14-day ADX) | a strong downtrend is in place — ADX, a 0–100 trend-strength gauge, is 43, with sellers in control | 43.4 |
Momentum
3
| 14-day RSI | momentum is beaten down — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 25, in oversold territory (below 30) | 24.8 |
|---|---|---|
| Position in its 14-day range | it is trading right at the bottom of its 14-day range ($2.69 to $6.45) — its "stochastic" reading is 3 out of 100, where 0 would mean closing exactly at the 14-session low and 100 exactly at the high. This measures WHERE the price sits inside its recent range, which is a different question from the RSI beside it: RSI is a momentum gauge, measuring how FAST the price has been moving, so a stock can drift quietly to the bottom of its range with an ordinary RSI, or fall sharply and still sit in the middle. It has been climbing within that range over the last few sessions. | 3.2 |
| Since the MACD crossed zero | MACD, a trend-momentum gauge, is in negative territory (momentum leaning bearish) | 32 sessions |
Range
12
| 52-week high | its highest closing price over the past year (about 252 trading days) was $12.28 | $12.28 |
|---|---|---|
| From the 52-week high | it is 77.1% below its 52-week high (its highest price of the past year) | -77.1% |
| Above the 52-week low | it is 4.5% above its 52-week low (its lowest price of the past year) | +4.5% |
| Below the 52-week high | it is 77.1% below its highest point of the past year | 77.1% |
| Since a 20-day breakout | it made a new 20-day low about 3 trading days ago | 3 sessions |
| Since a 55-day breakout | it made a new 55-day low about 3 trading days ago | 3 sessions |
| All-time high | its highest closing price on record is $31.86 (set on 2021-06-17) | $31.86 |
| Given back of the 52-week move | over the past year its closes ranged ($2.75 to $12.08), and it has recovered essentially none of its fall from last year’s high — 1% of it. Chart-watchers call 61.8%-65% given back the "golden pocket" — for this company that is $8.52 to $8.81. It is watched widely enough that orders cluster there, which is the honest reason it matters; it is not a forecast. | 0.6% |
| From the all-time high | it is 91.2% below its all-time high | -91.2% |
| Nearest price level | it is trading 27.6% above a support level at $2.04 — a price it turned at twice since 2025-02-03, most recently on 2025-03-04. Since 2024-08-26 it has 3 such levels below the current price and 7 above. Levels like these describe where the price has reversed or paused before; they are not a forecast of where it will go. | -27.6% |
| All-time low | its lowest closing price on record is $0.503 (set on 2024-11-04) | $0.503 |
| Above the all-time low | it is 458.6% above its all-time low | +458.6% |
Volatility
5
| Band width vs its own 6 months | day-to-day price swings are unusually wide versus its own recent history (wider than about 99% of the past ~6 months) | 99th percentile |
|---|---|---|
| Typical daily range | in a typical session it travels about $0.3384 between its high and its low — about 12.0% of its price. That is its "average true range" over the last 14 sessions, which also counts the distance from the previous close, so a day that opens well away from yesterday counts as the large move it was | $0.3384 |
| Bollinger bands (20-day, ±2σ) | most of its recent trading has stayed between about $1.15 and $6.96 — the "Bollinger bands", a range drawn two standard deviations either side of its 20-day average price, which widens when the stock gets more volatile and narrows when it settles | $1.15 – $4.06 – $6.96 |
| Typical daily range (% of price) | its price moves about 12.0% in a typical session — among the most volatile in the catalog. This is the average gap between a session's high and low over the last 14 sessions, counting overnight moves, expressed against the current price so it can be compared with companies trading at any price | 12.0% |
| Stretch from the 200-day average | it is trading 7.4 daily ranges below its 200-day average price (47.3% below it in plain percentage terms) — a way of asking how far it has stretched from its own average in units of how far it normally moves in a day, so a calm company and a jumpy one can be compared on the same scale | 7.4 daily ranges below its 200-day average |
Volume
1
| Volume vs its 30-day average | trading volume is about normal versus its 30-day average | 0.61× |
|---|
Analyst
2
| Change in the average price target | analysts' average price target is unchanged from the prior reading | 0.0% |
|---|---|---|
| Change in the consensus rating | the analyst consensus rating is unchanged since the prior reading | unchanged |
Candlestick patterns
2
| Since a doji | today it opened and closed at almost the same price after trading through a wider range — a "doji", the classic picture of buyers and sellers finishing the session level | today |
|---|---|---|
| Since a bullish engulfing | 7 sessions ago it opened below the previous session's close and finished above that session's open — a "bullish engulfing" pair, where one up day more than undid the down day before it | 7 sessions ago |
Price gaps
3
| Gap at the open | it opened on 2026-08-24 0.4% above the previous session's close — an overnight gap, the part of the move that happened while the market was shut, and traded back through that level before the close | +0.4% |
|---|---|---|
| Open gap | it gapped 2.0% below the previous close 2 sessions ago and has not traded back through the level it left behind at 2.95 — an "unfilled gap", which describes a price range no trade has since crossed and is not a forecast that it will be crossed | -2.0% |
| Gap filled | a 3.5% gap up opened on 2026-08-07 has been "filled" 11 sessions ago — price traded back through the level the gap left behind, and it closed again during the very session that opened it | 11 sessions ago |
Price streaks
1
| Closing streak | it has closed higher 2 sessions in a row, a +2.18% move over the run — an unbroken run of up days, which describes what has already happened and says nothing about the next session | 2 sessions up |
|---|
Relative strength
4
| vs market, 1 month | over the past 1 month this stock lagged the market by 54.5 percentage points (the stock lost 51.0% while the market gained 3.4%) | -54.5% |
|---|---|---|
| vs market, 3 months | over the past 3 months this stock lagged the market by 36.9 percentage points (the stock lost 34.5% while the market gained 2.4%) | -36.9% |
| vs market, 6 months | over the past 6 months this stock lagged the market by 50.5 percentage points (the stock lost 39.4% while the market gained 11.1%) | -50.5% |
| vs market, 12 months | over the past 12 months this stock lagged the market by 94.3 percentage points (the stock lost 75.9% while the market gained 18.3%) | -94.3% |
Signal agreement
2
| Bullish technical signals | 3 of the 9 technical signals we can compute for it are currently in a bullish state: a "golden cross" — its 50-day average is above its 200-day, its RSI momentum gauge is oversold (a beaten-down reading), near the bottom of its 14-day range (oversold) — these describe past price behaviour, not a forecast | 3 of 9 |
|---|---|---|
| Bearish technical signals | 6 of the 9 technical signals we can compute for it are currently in a bearish state: a strong downtrend, with sellers in control, trading below its 200-day average, a fresh 20-day low, MACD momentum is negative, lagging the market over 6 months, trading below the Ichimoku cloud — these describe past price behaviour, not a forecast | 6 of 9 |
Trend (Ichimoku cloud)
1
| Vs the Ichimoku cloud | trading 49% below the Ichimoku cloud — a band drawn from where its own highs and lows sat up to 2026-07-16 and projected forward over today's price, the side traders read as an established downtrend, with the band above acting as the level that would have to be cleared. The band itself is thick, spanning 26.6% of the share price, which is taken to mean a barrier that has held for a while and takes effort to cross. | -49.1% |
|---|
Volume-weighted price
2
| Vs this year’s average price paid | the price is 38% below the average price paid so far this year, so the typical buyer over that stretch is under water. That average is $4.53 — a volume-weighted average of daily closes over 160 sessions, not a true tick-by-tick VWAP. | -37.9% |
|---|---|---|
| Vs the average paid since it last reported | the price is 12% below the average price paid since it last reported on 2026-08-05 (its 10-Q), so the typical buyer over that stretch is under water. That average is $3.18 — a volume-weighted average of daily closes over 14 sessions, not a true tick-by-tick VWAP. | -11.7% |
Price levels it has turned at before
TDUP last closed at $2.81 on 2026-08-24. Since 2024-08-26 it has turned at 3 prices below its last close and 7 above; the 3 nearest below and the 3 nearest above are listed, nearest first.
| Level | Side | Distance | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| $2.04 | Support | 27.6% below the last close | turned there twice · 2025-02-03 to 2025-03-04 |
| $1.82 | Support | 35.3% below the last close | turned there twice · 2024-12-02 to 2024-12-11 |
| $1.30 | Support | 53.6% below the last close | turned there twice · 2024-12-19 to 2024-12-30 |
| $6.01 | Resistance | 113.9% above the last close | turned there twice · 2025-12-24 to 2026-07-13 |
| $6.58 | Resistance | 134.0% above the last close | turned there twice · 2025-05-06 to 2025-07-10 |
| $6.80 | Resistance | 142.2% above the last close | turned there twice · 2025-06-02 to 2025-11-21 |
A level is a price this company reversed or paused at more than once — they describe past behaviour, not a forecast of where the price will go.
Wave structure
Its recent swings can be read as a five-part downward sequence — what Elliott-wave chartists call an impulse — now in leg 3 of five.
This labelling fails — stops being a possible reading at all — if it closes above $6.45.
This is one of several labellings that fit the same swings, so treat it as a reading rather than the reading. It was chosen from 2 labellings that survived the rules, counting shorter readings of the same bars.
On past moves of this shape the leg has usually ended somewhere between $4.35 and $5.15 — that is where it has tended to end if the count holds, not a forecast of where the price goes.
Alternate reading: The same swings also read as a three-part correction in leg C, which fails on a close above $6.45.
This labelling was already in place when we began recording count changes on 2026-08-13, so how long it has stood is not something we can say yet.
Read from daily closes as of 2026-08-24.
An Elliott-wave count describes the swings already printed and the level that would disprove it. It is not a forecast, a target, or advice.
Screens: Trading below the 200-day moving average · Recent golden cross (50-day crossed above 200-day) · Oversold (14-day RSI below 30) · Pulled back from the 12-month high · Broke down to a new 20-day low · lagging the market | Learn: moving average · golden cross · adx · rsi · breakout · fifty two week high low
Based on daily closing prices as of 2026-08-24. Describes past price behavior only — informational, not financial advice.
Analyst consensus
- Consensus ratingStrong Buy (1.29 mean, 1=Strong Buy…5=Strong Sell) — 5 analysts
- Mean price target$7.24 range $5.70 – $10.00; median $6.50
Analyst estimates, as of 2026-08-17. These are third-party analyst opinions and price targets, aggregated — not a recommendation, prediction, or advice from stocks-llm. Informational only.
Analyst EPS estimate for TDUP
- Consensus EPS estimate-$0.04333 next reporting period, as of 2026-08-17
Change over time is not available yet: it needs two readings of the same reporting period at least 30 days apart, and we have been recording these estimates since 2026-08-04. An estimate for a DIFFERENT quarter is not a revision, so a reading from before the last report is never compared with one after it.
The consensus estimate for the next reporting period, and how it has moved between readings of that SAME period. A change is measured only between readings estimating one period — when a company reports, the consensus moves to the next quarter and the two numbers are not comparable. Informational only, not a forecast and not advice.
Key risks (from latest filing)
["Ability to attract and retain buyers and sellers in an intensely competitive market dominated by traditional off-price retailers and fast-fashion competitors","Dependency on successfully integrating AI and machine learning technologies into operations and customer experience","Current unprofitability and need to achieve and maintain profitability while scaling operations; cash sufficiency to meet liquidity needs"]
What changed in the latest 10-Q
AI-assisted comparison of TDUP's 10-Q filed 2026-05-04 against the prior one filed 2025-11-03.
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
- Added:
- Newer filing references 2025 10-K instead of 2024 10-K for annual report comparison (filed 2026-05-04 vs 2025-11-03)
- Newer filing updates GlobalData market survey date to April 2026 (from January 2025 in older filing)
- Newer filing introduces 'Overview of First Quarter Results' section with Q1 2026 vs Q1 2025 comparisons
- Newer filing reports Q1 2026 revenue of $81.7 million vs $71.3 million in Q1 2025 (14.6% increase)
- Newer filing reports Q1 2026 gross profit of $64.7 million vs $56.4 million in Q1 2025 (14.7% increase)
- Newer filing reports Q1 2026 net loss of $6.5 million (-7.9% margin) vs $5.2 million (-7.3% margin) in Q1 2025
- Newer filing reports Q1 2026 Non-GAAP Adjusted EBITDA of $2.7 million (3.4% margin) vs $3.8 million (5.3% margin) in Q1 2025
- Newer filing reports Q1 2026 Active Buyers of 1.7 million (25.0% increase) and Orders of 1.6 million (19.3% increase) vs Q1 2025
- Newer filing includes Q1 2026 metrics table with March 31, 2026 vs March 31, 2025 comparisons
- Newer filing includes reconciliation table for Non-GAAP Adjusted EBITDA for Q1 2026 and Q1 2025
- Removed:
- Older filing 'Recent Business Developments' section containing 'Discontinued Operations' discussion (Remix divestment on November 30, 2024) removed from newer filing
- Older filing 'Tax Reform' section discussing the One Big Beautiful Bill Act of 2025 (OBBBA) removed from newer filing
- Older filing 'Overview of Third Quarter Results' section with Q3 2025 vs Q3 2024 comparisons removed from newer filing
- Older filing Key Financial and Operating Metrics table with Q3 2025/2024 and nine-month 2025/2024 comparisons removed from newer filing
- Older filing metrics definitions and reconciliation tables for continuing operations removed from newer filing
- Reworded:
- Description of seller process changed from 'ThredUp's sellers order a Clean Out Kit, fill it and return it to us using our prepaid label' (older) to 'ThredUp's sellers order a Clean Out Bag or a prepaid shipping label, fill a bag or a box and return it to us' (newer)
- Older filing text ending with 'and supplements our overall supply strategy' (older) expanded to 'and supplements our overall supply strategy and other services' (newer)
- Older filing references 'loss from continuing operations' throughout metrics and discussion; newer filing uses 'Net loss' without continuing operations qualifier
- Metric definition changed from 'Non-GAAP Adjusted EBITDA from continuing operations' (older) to 'Non-GAAP Adjusted EBITDA' (newer, without 'from continuing operations' language)
- Notes:
- The two filings report results for different fiscal periods (Q1 2026 in newer vs Q3 2025 in older), making direct operational comparisons between the filings' main sections limited
- Older filing discusses discontinued operations (Remix), whereas newer filing does not address discontinued operations in the provided text section
- Text of older filing appears truncated at end of Active Buyers definition; complete comparison of that section not possible
Risk Factors
- Added:
- Page numbers changed from 31 to 27 for Items 1A-6 and Signatures (newer filing filed 2026-05-04)
- Balance sheet date changed to March 31, 2026 with comparative date of December 31, 2025 (newer filing filed 2026-05-04)
- Cash and cash equivalents: $38,996 thousand as of March 31, 2026 (newer filing filed 2026-05-04)
- Marketable securities: $10,457 thousand as of March 31, 2026 (newer filing filed 2026-05-04)
- Accounts receivable, net: $4,316 thousand as of March 31, 2026 (newer filing filed 2026-05-04)
- Property and equipment, net: $67,704 thousand as of March 31, 2026 (newer filing filed 2026-05-04)
- Operating lease right-of-use assets: $26,353 thousand as of March 31, 2026 (newer filing filed 2026-05-04)
- Forward-looking statements reference to Form 10-K for year ended December 31, 2025 (newer filing filed 2026-05-04)
- Removed:
- Page numbers 31 for Items 1A-6 and Signatures (older filing filed 2025-11-03)
- Balance sheet date of September 30, 2025 with comparative date of December 31, 2024 (older filing filed 2025-11-03)
- Cash and cash equivalents: $46,218 thousand as of September 30, 2025 (older filing filed 2025-11-03)
- Marketable securities: $4,893 thousand as of September 30, 2025 (older filing filed 2025-11-03)
- Accounts receivable, net: $3,725 thousand as of September 30, 2025 (older filing filed 2025-11-03)
- Property and equipment, net: $67,901 thousand as of September 30, 2025 (older filing filed 2025-11-03)
- Operating lease right-of-use assets: $27,337 thousand as of September 30, 2025 (older filing filed 2025-11-03)
- Forward-looking statement bullet point: 'our discontinuation of European operations in connection with the divestiture of our Remix subsidiary' (older filing filed 2025-11-03)
- Forward-looking statements reference to Form 10-K for year ended December 31, 2024 (older filing filed 2025-11-03)
- Reworded:
- Changed 'increased interest rates' to 'interest rate volatility' in forward-looking statements (newer filing filed 2026-05-04)
- Changed 'recognize realize' to 'realize' in forward-looking statements risk language (newer filing filed 2026-05-04)
- Removed redundant reference to SEC in forward-looking statements paragraph (newer filing filed 2026-05-04)
- Notes:
- The older filing appears truncated at the balance sheet liabilities section; full comparison of balance sheet items and subsequent sections not possible
- Financial data is factual reporting only and does not constitute materiality assessment
AI-assisted comparison of two SEC filing sections. It describes wording and theme changes only, makes no materiality, legal, or investment judgement, and is not financial advice. Informational only — not financial advice.
Insider activity (SEC Form 4)
0 open-market purchases and 9 open-market sales by insiders in the last 90 days.
- Last 90 days0 buys · 9 sells ($1M) — 3 selling insiders
- Last 180 days0 buys · 9 sells ($1M) — 3 selling insiders
Activity heuristic: net selling (a transparent product heuristic from the counts above, not a prediction or advice)
Most recent open-market transaction: 2026-06-02. As of 2026-08-25.
View full insider trading history → View SEC Form 3/4/5 filingsAsk about TDUP's insider activity →
Only open-market purchases (SEC code P) and sales (code S) are counted here. Option exercises, vesting/awards, gifts, and shares withheld for taxes are excluded — they are compensation or mechanical, not open-market conviction. Sales may be planned and non-discretionary (e.g. a Rule 10b5-1 plan) and are not necessarily bearish; open-market buying is not a recommendation to buy. Informational only — not financial advice.
Institutional ownership (13F)
5 institutional 13F filers reported holding TDUP as of 2026-03-31 (quarter-end position, filed within 45 days).
- Distinct 13F filers 5
- Reported shares held 16,865,103
- Reported value $55,317,537
reported quarterly holdings change (2025-12-31 → 2026-03-31): 0 new, 2 increased, 3 decreased, 0 exited. Change counts cover only managers that filed 13F reports in BOTH quarters, derived between two quarter-end snapshots — not same-day trades; a single manager is never said to have "bought" or "sold".
Institutional holdings are quarter-end long positions reported on SEC Form 13F-HR, filed up to 45 days after the quarter ends — they are delayed, are not real-time trades, exclude short positions and most non-US securities, and are not investment advice. Any increase/decrease is a reported change between two quarterly snapshots, not a same-day purchase or sale. These are quarter-end snapshots from the 13F filings on SEC EDGAR, filed within 45 days — not real-time, and any change is a difference between two quarterly reports, not a same-day trade. Informational only — not financial advice.
Short interest (FINRA)
TDUP had 19,197,601 shares of reported short interest as of the 2026-07-31 FINRA settlement date (delayed, bi-monthly; not real-time).
Short interest as a percent of shares outstanding is not shown for TDUP because we do not hold a verified share count to divide it by. The reported figures above are unaffected.
- Reported short interest (shares) 19,197,601
- Prior settlement (shares) 19,847,001
- Reported change -3.27%
- Days to cover (reported) 14.53
Reported to FINRA as of the 2026-07-31 settlement date. Short interest is reported to FINRA and published on a delayed, bi-monthly schedule (as of a settlement date, disseminated roughly eight business days later) — it is NOT real-time, does not cover every venue or all US trading, and is not a short-squeeze prediction or investment advice. Days-to-cover is the value FINRA reports; percent of float is not shown because the source file carries no share-count denominator — where a percent appears it is of shares OUTSTANDING, the larger base, and is therefore a floor on percent of float. Informational only — not financial advice.
Competitors & peers
- Poshmark
- Vinted
- Depop
- The RealReal
- Vestiaire Collective
- Off-price retailers (e.g., TJ Maxx, Ross)
- Fast-fashion retailers (e.g., H&M, Forever 21)
AI-enriched competitor set. Linked names are companies covered by stocks-llm; other named peers are shown for reference only.
Compare TDUP vs…
Frequently asked questions
What does THREDUP INC CLASS A (TDUP) do?
ThredUp operates a managed online resale marketplace for apparel, shoes and accessories where sellers ship items in prepaid "Clean Out Bags" for processing and resale, while buyers browse millions of unique items at steep discounts. The company's custom-built platform combines distributed processing infrastructure, proprietary software systems, and data science expertise to handle single-SKU logistics at scale.
What sector is THREDUP INC CLASS A (TDUP) in?
THREDUP INC CLASS A (TDUP) is classified in the Consumer Discretionary sector. Its industry is Online fashion resale and secondhand marketplace. It trades on NASDAQ.
Who are THREDUP INC CLASS A's (TDUP) competitors?
Notable peers of THREDUP INC CLASS A (TDUP) include Poshmark, Vinted, Depop, The RealReal and Vestiaire Collective. This peer set is informational only — not financial advice.
Is THREDUP INC CLASS A (TDUP) overbought or oversold right now?
THREDUP INC CLASS A (TDUP) is currently in oversold territory (its 14-day RSI is 25, below 30) (as of 2026-08-24). RSI describes recent price momentum, not a forecast — informational only, not financial advice.
Where does stocks-llm's data on TDUP come from?
Fundamentals and prices come from market data, as of 2026-08-24; company filings and profile facts come from SEC EDGAR. All figures are delayed daily-close data shown with their as-of date — informational only, not financial advice.
Fundamentals: market data, as of 2026-08-24. Filings: SEC EDGAR. Prices are delayed daily-close data.
Last updated 2026-08-24.
Informational only — NOT financial advice. All figures are delayed daily-close data from SEC EDGAR & market data, shown with their as-of date.