UNISYS CORP (UIS)
Information Technology · IT Services & Consulting · NYSE
Unisys is an IT services provider focused on digital workplace, cloud, infrastructure, and enterprise computing solutions for complex organizational environments.
What UNISYS CORP does
Unisys Corporation is an information technology company that provides digital workplace solutions, cloud and infrastructure services, and enterprise computing solutions. The company focuses on helping organizations modernize their IT environments and secure their digital operations through specialized software and consulting services.
Themes: digital transformation, cloud infrastructure, IT modernization, AI infrastructure, managed services
Fundamentals
- Price$2.31 as of 2026-10-08 close
- Market cap$168M as of 2026-06-30 (share count; price 2026-10-08)
- 1-year return-39.2% 2025-10-08 close $3.80 → 2026-10-08 close $2.31
- P/En/a negative earnings
- Net margin-17.4% FY2025, SEC XBRL
- Gross margin+28.2% FY2025, SEC XBRL
- Debt / equity44.12 as of 2026-09-02
- Revenue growth (YoY)-0.6% as of 2026-09-02
- Revenue CAGR (3y)-0.5% SEC XBRL
- Beta1.62 as of 2026-09-02
- Last reported earnings2026-07-29 SEC EDGAR Form 8-K (Item 2.02)
How UIS compares in its sector
- net profit marginbottom 25% 380 covered Information Technology peers, as of 2026-09-02
- operating marginmiddle range 375 covered Information Technology peers, as of 2026-09-02
- gross marginbottom 25% 311 covered Information Technology peers, as of 2026-09-02
- 3-year revenue CAGRmiddle range 385 covered Information Technology peers
- free cash flow (absolute dollars, latest fiscal year)bottom 10% 382 covered Information Technology peers, as of FY2025
Position among covered Information Technology companies that report each metric (minimum 5 peers). A relative position within our covered catalog — not a valuation, quality, or investment judgment. A higher percentile is simply a higher value (for P/E, more expensive on earnings — never "better"). Informational only.
How UNISYS CORP looks technically
UNISYS CORP (UIS) is trading 18.5% below its 200-day average, the long-term trend line — a long-term downtrend. Its 50-day average crossed below its 200-day average about 12 trading days ago — a "death cross", a bearish long-term signal. A strong downtrend is in place — ADX, a 0–100 trend-strength gauge, is 36, with sellers in control. Momentum is neutral — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 38, neither overbought (above 70) nor oversold (below 30). It made a new 20-day low about 9 trading days ago. It is 53.6% below its highest point of the past year. Day-to-day price swings are unusually narrow versus its own recent history — a "Bollinger squeeze" (in the tightest 2% of the past ~6 months), which often precedes a bigger move.
Trend
8
| Distance from the 200-day | it is trading 18.5% below its 200-day average, the long-term trend line — a long-term downtrend | -18.5% |
|---|---|---|
| 50-day moving average | its average price over the last 50 trading days — a short-term trend line — is $2.60 | $2.60 |
| 200-day moving average | its average price over the last 200 trading days — the long-term trend line — is $2.84 | $2.84 |
| Swing structure | each recent peak has been lower than the one before it and each dip deeper — the pattern chart-watchers call a downtrend, which describes where price has already been and not where it goes next | lower highs and lower lows |
| Last swing turn | its last significant turn was a swing low 10 calendar days ago — the swings before that are what the structure reading is measured on | 10 sessions |
| Wave structure | its recent swings can be read as a five-part downward sequence — what Elliott-wave chartists call an impulse — now in the fourth leg, a pullback against that downward direction; the labelling fails if price closes above 2.39. It is the only labelling that fits, though not with textbook proportions, and it describes the swings already printed, not what comes next. | possible downward five-wave sequence, in wave 4 (atypical proportions) |
| Since the 50/200 cross | its 50-day average crossed below its 200-day average about 12 trading days ago — a "death cross", a bearish long-term signal | 12 sessions |
| Trend strength (14-day ADX) | a strong downtrend is in place — ADX, a 0–100 trend-strength gauge, is 36, with sellers in control | 36.4 |
Momentum
3
| 14-day RSI | momentum is neutral — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 38, neither overbought (above 70) nor oversold (below 30) | 38.4 |
|---|---|---|
| Position in its 14-day range | it is trading in the lower half of its 14-day range ($2.16 to $2.51) — its "stochastic" reading is 43 out of 100, where 0 would mean closing exactly at the 14-session low and 100 exactly at the high. This measures WHERE the price sits inside its recent range, which is a different question from the RSI beside it: RSI is a momentum gauge, measuring how FAST the price has been moving, so a stock can drift quietly to the bottom of its range with an ordinary RSI, or fall sharply and still sit in the middle. It has been climbing within that range over the last few sessions. | 42.9 |
| Since the MACD crossed zero | MACD, a trend-momentum gauge, is in positive territory (momentum leaning bullish) | 32 sessions |
Range
12
| 52-week high | its highest closing price over the past year (about 252 trading days) was $4.97 | $4.97 |
|---|---|---|
| From the 52-week high | it is 53.6% below its 52-week high (its highest price of the past year) | -53.6% |
| Above the 52-week low | it is 17.3% above its 52-week low (its lowest price of the past year) | +17.3% |
| Below the 52-week high | it is 53.6% below its highest point of the past year | 53.6% |
| Since a 20-day breakout | it made a new 20-day low about 9 trading days ago | 9 sessions |
| Since a 55-day breakout | it made a new 55-day low about 9 trading days ago | 9 sessions |
| All-time high | its highest closing price on record is $97.00 (set on 2007-07-05) | $97.00 |
| Given back of the 52-week move | over the past year its closes ranged ($2.00 to $4.78), and it has given back almost all of its rise from last year’s low — 89% of it. Chart-watchers call 61.8%-65% given back the "golden pocket" — for this company that is $2.97 to $3.06. It is watched widely enough that orders cluster there, which is the honest reason it matters; it is not a forecast. | 88.8% |
| From the all-time high | it is 97.6% below its all-time high | -97.6% |
| Nearest price level | it is trading 3.3% below a resistance level at $2.38 — a price it turned at twice since 2025-11-21, most recently on 2026-09-10. Since 2024-10-08 it has 0 such levels below the current price and 15 above. Levels like these describe where the price has reversed or paused before; they are not a forecast of where it will go. | +3.3% |
| All-time low | its lowest closing price on record is $1.97 (set on 2026-04-10) | $1.97 |
| Above the all-time low | it is 17.3% above its all-time low | +17.3% |
Volatility
5
| Band width vs its own 6 months | day-to-day price swings are unusually narrow versus its own recent history — a "Bollinger squeeze" (in the tightest 2% of the past ~6 months), which often precedes a bigger move | 2nd percentile |
|---|---|---|
| Typical daily range | in a typical session it travels about $0.1045 between its high and its low — about 4.5% of its price. That is its "average true range" over the last 14 sessions, which also counts the distance from the previous close, so a day that opens well away from yesterday counts as the large move it was | $0.1045 |
| Bollinger bands (20-day, ±2σ) | most of its recent trading has stayed between about $2.21 and $2.53 — the "Bollinger bands", a range drawn two standard deviations either side of its 20-day average price, which widens when the stock gets more volatile and narrows when it settles | $2.21 – $2.37 – $2.53 |
| Typical daily range (% of price) | its price moves about 4.5% in a typical session — about typical for the companies we cover. This is the average gap between a session's high and low over the last 14 sessions, counting overnight moves, expressed against the current price so it can be compared with companies trading at any price | 4.5% |
| Stretch from the 200-day average | it is trading 5.0 daily ranges below its 200-day average price (18.5% below it in plain percentage terms) — a way of asking how far it has stretched from its own average in units of how far it normally moves in a day, so a calm company and a jumpy one can be compared on the same scale | 5.0 daily ranges below its 200-day average |
Volume
1
| Volume vs its 30-day average | trading volume is about normal versus its 30-day average | 1.24× |
|---|
Analyst
2
| Change in the average price target | analysts' average price target is unchanged from the prior reading | 0.0% |
|---|---|---|
| Change in the consensus rating | not available for this company yet | n/a |
Candlestick patterns
3
| Since a doji | 1 session ago it opened and closed at almost the same price after trading through a wider range — a "doji", the classic picture of buyers and sellers finishing the session level | 1 session ago |
|---|---|---|
| Since a hammer | 8 sessions ago, after a stretch of decline, it sold off hard during the session and then closed back near its high — a "hammer", the long lower wick showing the drop was bought back before the close | 8 sessions ago |
| Since a bullish engulfing | 7 sessions ago it opened below the previous session's close and finished above that session's open — a "bullish engulfing" pair, where one up day more than undid the down day before it | 7 sessions ago |
Price gaps
3
| Gap at the open | it opened on 2026-10-08 0.9% below the previous session's close — an overnight gap, the part of the move that happened while the market was shut, and traded back through that level before the close | -0.9% |
|---|---|---|
| Open gap | it gapped 12.7% below the previous close 49 sessions ago and has not traded back through the level it left behind at 3.46 — an "unfilled gap", which describes a price range no trade has since crossed and is not a forecast that it will be crossed | -12.7% |
| Gap filled | a 2.2% gap down opened on 2026-09-28 has been "filled" 6 sessions ago — price traded back through the level the gap left behind, and it took 2 sessions to close | 6 sessions ago |
Price streaks
1
| Closing streak | it closed higher in its latest session, after a session that did not close higher — a single up day rather than a run | 1 session up |
|---|
Relative strength
4
| vs market, 1 month | over the past 1 month this stock lagged the market by 9.7 percentage points (the stock lost 8.7% while the market gained 1.0%) | -9.7% |
|---|---|---|
| vs market, 3 months | over the past 3 months this stock lagged the market by 38.9 percentage points (the stock lost 35.1% while the market gained 3.8%) | -38.9% |
| vs market, 6 months | over the past 6 months this stock lagged the market by 5.9 percentage points (the stock gained 11.6% while the market gained 17.5%) | -5.9% |
| vs market, 12 months | over the past 12 months this stock lagged the market by 54.2 percentage points (the stock lost 39.2% while the market gained 15.0%) | -54.2% |
Signal agreement
2
| Bullish technical signals | 1 of the 9 technical signals we can compute for it is currently in a bullish state: MACD momentum is positive — these describe past price behaviour, not a forecast | 1 of 9 |
|---|---|---|
| Bearish technical signals | 5 of the 9 technical signals we can compute for it are currently in a bearish state: a "death cross" — its 50-day average is below its 200-day, trading below its 200-day average, a strong downtrend, with sellers in control, lagging the market over 6 months, trading below the Ichimoku cloud — these describe past price behaviour, not a forecast | 5 of 9 |
Trend (Ichimoku cloud)
1
| Vs the Ichimoku cloud | trading 20% below the Ichimoku cloud — a band drawn from where its own highs and lows sat up to 2026-09-01 and projected forward over today's price, the side traders read as an established downtrend, with the band above acting as the level that would have to be cleared. The band itself is thick, spanning 24.9% of the share price, which is taken to mean a barrier that has held for a while and takes effort to cross. | -19.6% |
|---|
Volume-weighted price
2
| Vs this year’s average price paid | the price is 22% below the average price paid so far this year, so the typical buyer over that stretch is under water. That average is $2.95 — a volume-weighted average of daily closes over 190 sessions, not a true tick-by-tick VWAP. | -21.6% |
|---|---|---|
| Vs the average paid since it last reported | the price is 12% below the average price paid since it last reported on 2026-07-29 (its 8-K), so the typical buyer over that stretch is under water. That average is $2.64 — a volume-weighted average of daily closes over 51 sessions, not a true tick-by-tick VWAP. | -12.4% |
Price levels it has turned at before
UIS last closed at $2.31 on 2026-10-08. Since 2024-10-08 it has turned at 0 prices below its last close and 15 above; the 3 nearest above are listed, nearest first.
| Level | Side | Distance | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| $2.38 | Resistance | 3.3% above the last close | turned there twice · 2025-11-21 to 2026-09-10 |
| $2.58 | Resistance | 11.7% above the last close | turned there twice · 2026-01-05 to 2026-09-17 |
| $2.64 | Resistance | 14.4% above the last close | turned there twice · 2025-11-06 to 2026-02-25 |
A level is a price this company reversed or paused at more than once — they describe past behaviour, not a forecast of where the price will go.
Wave structure
Its recent swings can be read as a five-part downward sequence — what Elliott-wave chartists call an impulse — now in leg 4 of five, a pullback against that direction.
This labelling fails — stops being a possible reading at all — if it closes above $2.39.
It is the only labelling that fits these swings, though its proportions are not the textbook ones.
On past moves of this shape the leg has usually ended somewhere between $2.26 and $2.37 — that is where it has tended to end if the count holds, not a forecast of where the price goes.
This reading has stood for 3 trading days, since 2026-10-06.
Read from daily closes as of 2026-10-08.
An Elliott-wave count describes the swings already printed and the level that would disprove it. It is not a forecast, a target, or advice.
Screens: Trading below the 200-day moving average · Recent death cross (50-day crossed below 200-day) · Pulled back from the 12-month high · in a Bollinger Band volatility squeeze · lagging the market · Under water since its last earnings report (below the anchored VWAP) | Learn: moving average · golden cross · adx · rsi · breakout · fifty two week high low · bollinger bands
Based on daily closing prices as of 2026-10-08. Describes past price behavior only — informational, not financial advice.
Analyst consensus
- Consensus ratingBuy (2.00 mean, 1=Strong Buy…5=Strong Sell) — 4 analysts
- Mean price target$4.81 range $3.25 – $6.00; median $5.00
Analyst estimates, as of 2026-10-06. These are third-party analyst opinions and price targets, aggregated — not a recommendation, prediction, or advice from stocks-llm. Informational only.
Analyst EPS estimate for UIS
- Consensus EPS estimate-$0.208 next reporting period, as of 2026-10-06
- Estimate change, 30 days-$0.006 from -$0.202, on 2026-09-01, 35-day window
- Readings revised upward0% of 5 comparable readings
The consensus estimate for the next reporting period, and how it has moved between readings of that SAME period. A change is measured only between readings estimating one period — when a company reports, the consensus moves to the next quarter and the two numbers are not comparable. Informational only, not a forecast and not advice.
Key risks (from latest filing)
["Difficulty in meeting underfunded defined benefit pension plan obligations.","Risks associated with government contracting and public sector dependencies.","Financial pressure from high interest expenses and significant long-term debt."]
What changed in the latest 10-Q
AI-assisted comparison of UIS's 10-Q filed 2026-05-06 against the prior one filed 2025-11-06.
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
- Added:
- Newer filing (2026-05-06) reports Q1 2026 results: net loss of $35.8 million ($0.50 per diluted share) vs. Q1 2025 loss of $29.5 million ($0.42 per diluted share)
- Newer filing includes discussion of UK business process outsourcing joint venture transaction generating ~$3 million gross margin benefit in Q1 2026, expected to generate ~$12 million for full-year 2026
- Newer filing reports interest expense of $18.5 million for Q1 2026 vs. $8.2 million for Q1 2025
- Newer filing reports other (expense), net of $20.8 million for Q1 2026 vs. $16.9 million for Q1 2025
- Newer filing reports loss before income taxes of $23.1 million for Q1 2026 vs. $20.0 million for Q1 2025
- Newer filing reports provision for income taxes of $13.7 million for Q1 2026 vs. $10.6 million for Q1 2025 and effective tax rate of (59.3)% vs. (53.0%)
- Removed:
- Older filing (2025-11-06) reports Q3 2025 results with net loss of $308.9 million ($4.33 per diluted share) including $227.7 million pension settlement loss net of tax
- Older filing reports Q3 2025 goodwill impairment charges of $55.0 million related to DWS segment
- Older filing reports nine-month results for 2025 and 2024
- Older filing discusses pension plan settlement transaction in September 2025 involving ~$316 million group annuity contract purchase
- Older filing reports Q3 2025 other (expense), net of $241.2 million including $227.7 million pension settlement loss
- Older filing reports Q3 2025 loss before income taxes of $292.9 million
- Reworded:
- Reporting period changed from three months ended September 30, 2025 to three months ended March 31, 2026
- Revenue comparison changed from $460.2 million (Q3 2025) vs. $497.0 million (Q3 2024) to $437.6 million (Q1 2026) vs. $432.1 million (Q1 2025)
- L&S revenue changed from $83.0 million (Q3 2025) vs. $104.5 million (Q3 2024) to $65.5 million (Q1 2026) vs. $71.1 million (Q1 2025)
- Cost-reduction charges discussion changed from focus on pension settlement loss to focus on workforce reduction and lease abandonment charges
- Gross profit changed from $117.2 million (Q3 2025) to $112.5 million (Q1 2026) with different margin percentages
- SG&A expense changed from $90.9 million (Q3 2025) to $91.5 million (Q1 2026) with different percentage of revenue
- Notes:
- The two filings cover different periods (Q1 2026 vs. Q3 2025) and are not directly comparable quarterly results from the same fiscal year quarter
- The older filing contains significant one-time charges (pension settlement and goodwill impairment) not present in the newer filing
- Newer filing text appears truncated at the end and does not include complete discussion
Risk Factors
- Added:
- Added risk factor: 'effectively anticipate and respond to rapid technological innovation, such as artificial intelligence among others, in our industry' moved higher in Business and Operating section (filed 2026-05-06)
- Added risk factor: 'manage cybersecurity incidents, security incidents and breaches and other disruptions in our IT systems' with updated wording from 'manage cyber incidents' (filed 2026-05-06)
- Added risk factor: 'manage the legal risks related to artificial intelligence and other machine learning technology that are integrated into our services and solutions' under Legal and Regulatory section (filed 2026-05-06)
- Added risk factor: 'comply with the terms of the credit agreement that governs the Amended and Restated Asset Based Lending Credit Facility and the 10.625% Senior Secured Notes due 2031 indenture' (filed 2026-05-06)
- Added risk factor: 'attract, retain, and develop skilled employees to align with global client demand and retain and develop strong leaders' with more specific language (filed 2026-05-06)
- Removed:
- Removed risk factor: 'manage the impacts of new or increased tariffs' from Business and Operating section (filed 2025-11-06)
- Removed reference to 'an impairment during the third quarter of 2025' from Accounting section goodwill impairment bullet point (filed 2025-11-06)
- Removed phrase 'which may be limited' from net operating loss carryforwards risk factor (filed 2025-11-06)
- Reworded:
- Changed 'manage cyber incidents, security incidents and breaches' to 'manage cybersecurity incidents, security incidents and breaches' (filed 2026-05-06)
- Changed 'adapt to the adverse effects of volatile, negative or uncertain economic, geopolitical or political conditions' to 'adapt to the adverse effects of volatile, negative or uncertain economic, geopolitical and political conditions' (filed 2026-05-06)
- Changed 'align employees and their skills with global client demand and retain and develop employees and management with strong leadership skills' to 'attract, retain, and develop skilled employees to align with global client demand and retain and develop strong leaders' (filed 2026-05-06)
- Changed 'manage the performance and capabilities of third parties' to 'manage the pricing, performance and capabilities of third parties' (filed 2026-05-06)
- Changed 'adapt to an evolving international trade and tariff environment' as replacement for removed tariffs-specific risk (filed 2026-05-06)
- Changed 'meet sustainability expectations, standards, and goals, or comply with sustainability regulations or laws' to 'meet global sustainability standards and expectations, achieve our sustainability goals and comply with sustainability laws and regulations' (filed 2026-05-06)
- Reordered Business and Operating risks with AI and cybersecurity appearing earlier in list (filed 2026-05-06)
- Notes:
- The newer filing is a 10-Q for Q1 2026 (period ending March 31, 2026) while the older filing is a 10-Q for Q3 2025 (period ending September 30, 2025), representing different interim periods
- Financial statements presented in the two filings cover different reporting periods and are not directly comparable quarter-to-quarter
- The Risk Factors section references different annual 10-K fiscal years (December 31, 2025 in newer filing vs December 31, 2024 in older filing)
AI-assisted comparison of two SEC filing sections. It describes wording and theme changes only, makes no materiality, legal, or investment judgement, and is not financial advice. Informational only — not financial advice.
Insider activity (SEC Form 4)
0 open-market purchases and 1 open-market sale by insiders in the last 90 days, of which we have read Form 4 filings through 2026-10-04. The 5 days since 2026-10-04 have not been checked yet.
- Last 90 days · read to 2026-10-040 buys · 1 sell ($26765) — 1 selling insider
- Last 180 days · read to 2026-10-040 buys · 5 sells ($667297) — 3 selling insiders
Activity heuristic: net selling (a transparent product heuristic from the counts above, not a prediction or advice)
Most recent open-market transaction: 2026-09-04. Based on Form 4 filings read through 2026-10-04; anything filed since is not yet included.
View full insider trading history → View SEC Form 3/4/5 filingsAsk about UIS's insider activity →
Only open-market purchases (SEC code P) and sales (code S) are counted here. Option exercises, vesting/awards, gifts, and shares withheld for taxes are excluded — they are compensation or mechanical, not open-market conviction. Sales may be planned and non-discretionary (e.g. a Rule 10b5-1 plan) and are not necessarily bearish; open-market buying is not a recommendation to buy. Informational only — not financial advice.
Institutional ownership (13F)
5 institutional 13F filers reported holding UIS as of 2026-06-30 (quarter-end position, filed within 45 days).
- Distinct 13F filers 5
- Reported shares held 8,036,488
- Reported value $29,431,745
reported quarterly holdings change (2026-03-31 → 2026-06-30): 0 new, 4 increased, 1 decreased, 0 exited. Change counts cover only managers that filed 13F reports in BOTH quarters, derived between two quarter-end snapshots — not same-day trades; a single manager is never said to have "bought" or "sold".
Institutional holdings are quarter-end long positions reported on SEC Form 13F-HR, filed up to 45 days after the quarter ends — they are delayed, are not real-time trades, exclude short positions and most non-US securities, and are not investment advice. Any increase/decrease is a reported change between two quarterly snapshots, not a same-day purchase or sale. These are quarter-end snapshots from the 13F filings on SEC EDGAR, filed within 45 days — not real-time, and any change is a difference between two quarterly reports, not a same-day trade. Informational only — not financial advice.
Ask about UIS's institutional holders → See what each manager we track holds →
Short interest (FINRA)
UIS had 5,691,199 shares of reported short interest as of the 2026-09-15 FINRA settlement date (delayed, bi-monthly; not real-time).
UIS had 7.81% of its shares outstanding sold short as of the 2026-09-15 FINRA settlement date (percent of FLOAT would be higher — float is not disclosed in the source). FINRA reported 10.85 days to cover at the same settlement.
- Reported short interest (shares) 5,691,199
- Short interest (% of shares outstanding) 7.81%
- Prior settlement (shares) 5,484,268
- Reported change 3.77%
- Days to cover (reported) 10.85
Reported to FINRA as of the 2026-09-15 settlement date. Short interest is reported to FINRA and published on a delayed, bi-monthly schedule (as of a settlement date, disseminated roughly eight business days later) — it is NOT real-time, does not cover every venue or all US trading, and is not a short-squeeze prediction or investment advice. Days-to-cover is the value FINRA reports; percent of float is not shown because the source file carries no share-count denominator — where a percent appears it is of shares OUTSTANDING, the larger base, and is therefore a floor on percent of float. Informational only — not financial advice.
Competitors & peers
- Accenture (ACN)
- DXC Technology (DXC)
- IBM (IBM)
- Cognizant (CTSH)
- CACI International (CACI)
- Science Applications International Corp (SAIC)
AI-enriched competitor set. Linked names are companies covered by stocks-llm; other named peers are shown for reference only.
Compare UIS vs…
UNISYS CORP is found in…
Frequently asked questions
What does UNISYS CORP (UIS) do?
Unisys Corporation is an information technology company that provides digital workplace solutions, cloud and infrastructure services, and enterprise computing solutions. The company focuses on helping organizations modernize their IT environments and secure their digital operations through specialized software and consulting services.
What sector is UNISYS CORP (UIS) in?
UNISYS CORP (UIS) is classified in the Information Technology sector. Its industry is IT Services & Consulting. It trades on NYSE.
Who are UNISYS CORP's (UIS) competitors?
Notable peers of UNISYS CORP (UIS) include Accenture, DXC Technology, IBM, Cognizant and CACI International. This peer set is informational only — not financial advice.
Is UNISYS CORP (UIS) overbought or oversold right now?
UNISYS CORP (UIS) is currently neither overbought nor oversold — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 38, in the neutral middle (as of 2026-10-08). RSI describes recent price momentum, not a forecast — informational only, not financial advice.
Where does stocks-llm's data on UIS come from?
Fundamentals come from SEC XBRL company filings for the figures marked with a fiscal year, and market data, as of 2026-09-02 for the rest; prices are market data, as of 2026-09-02; company filings and profile facts come from SEC EDGAR. All figures are delayed daily-close data shown with their as-of date — informational only, not financial advice.
Fundamentals: SEC XBRL company filings for the figures marked with a fiscal year, and market data, as of 2026-09-02 for the rest. Filings: SEC EDGAR. Prices are delayed daily-close data.
Last updated 2026-10-08.
Informational only — NOT financial advice. All figures are delayed daily-close data from SEC EDGAR & market data, shown with their as-of date.