Skip to content

United Parcel Service (UPS)

Industrials · Air Freight & Logistics · NYSE

A global leader in logistics and supply chain management, operating one of the world's most extensive package delivery and transportation networks.

What United Parcel Service does

United Parcel Service is a global leader in logistics, providing a broad range of solutions including the transportation of packages and freight, the facilitation of international trade, and the deployment of advanced technology to manage the world of commerce. The company operates one of the largest package delivery networks in the world, connecting supply chains across domestic and international markets.

Themes: logistics and supply chain management, global trade and commerce, e-commerce enablement, transportation infrastructure

Fundamentals

  • Price$102.01 as of 2026-08-21 close
  • Market cap$72.8B as of 2026-08-21
  • 1-year return+18.4% 2025-08-21 close $86.15 → 2026-08-21 close $102.01
  • P/E19.24 as of 2026-08-24
  • Net margin+5.1% as of 2026-08-24
  • Gross margin+81.9% as of 2026-08-24
  • ROE+29.1% as of 2026-08-24
  • Debt / equity1.63 as of 2026-08-24
  • Revenue growth (YoY)-0.4% as of 2026-08-24
  • Revenue CAGR (3y)-4.0% SEC XBRL
  • Beta1.04 as of 2026-08-24
  • Last reported earnings2026-07-28 SEC EDGAR Form 8-K (Item 2.02)

Dividend: yield +4.3%; at least 5 years of non-decreasing per-share dividends (SEC XBRL) — we do not hold the year before it, so the real streak may be longer.

Ask why UPS looks like this →

How UPS compares in its sector

  • price-to-earnings ratiobottom 25% 357 covered Industrials peers, as of 2026-08-24
  • net profit marginmiddle range 457 covered Industrials peers, as of 2026-08-24
  • operating marginmiddle range 457 covered Industrials peers, as of 2026-08-24
  • gross margintop 10% 455 covered Industrials peers, as of 2026-08-24
  • return on equitytop 25% 460 covered Industrials peers, as of 2026-08-24
  • 3-year revenue CAGRbottom 25% 426 covered Industrials peers
  • indicated dividend yieldtop 10% 267 covered Industrials peers, as of 2026-08-24
  • free cash flow (absolute dollars, latest fiscal year)top 10% 414 covered Industrials peers, as of FY2025

Position among covered Industrials companies that report each metric (minimum 5 peers). A relative position within our covered catalog — not a valuation, quality, or investment judgment. A higher percentile is simply a higher value (for P/E, more expensive on earnings — never "better"). Informational only.

Ask how UPS stacks up against peers →

Top 10 scores & list membership

UPS is not currently in any published Top 10 list. Its scores are below.

Long-term score

39.3 #839 of 987 scored · #166 of 197 in Industrials

  • Profitability50.1
  • Growth13.2
  • Financial health23.0
  • Valuation56.1
  • Capital return70.8
  • Long-term trend38.5

Capital return 71st (consecutive years of dividend increases 5 years) and valuation 56th (price to earnings 19, price to book 4.8); weakest is growth (13th, 3-year revenue CAGR -4%, revenue growth year over year -0.4%).

Short-term score

38.5 #1450 of 1,704 scored · #227 of 283 in Industrials

  • Trend30.1
  • Momentum37.8
  • Setup59.1
  • Volume and participation34.1
  • Catalysts32.5

Setup 59th: over the past year its closes ranged, and it has retraced around half of its move over the past year — 48% of it; momentum 38th: near the bottom of its 14-day range (oversold); weakest is trend 30th: a trend forming but not yet strong (ADX below 25).

Scores as of 21 Aug 2026. Each bar is a percentile: how this company ranked against every company the score ranked, 0–100. A list is a published formula and its output, not a recommendation. Method version 2.

Dividend coverage (FY2025)

Exceeded at least one reported measure. In FY2025, UPS's dividend exceeded at least one reported measure of what it earned or generated (earnings payout 97%, free-cash-flow payout 113%). A payout above 100% in one year is not necessarily unsustainable, but it is not fully covered by that measure.

  • Earnings payout97% dividends / net income
  • Free-cash-flow payout113% dividends / (operating cash flow − capex)

Coverage derived from reported SEC EDGAR XBRL figures for FY2025 (dividends paid vs. net income and free cash flow, same fiscal year). This describes PAST coverage for one fiscal year — it does not predict whether a dividend will be maintained, raised, or cut, and a one-year payout ratio can be distorted by non-recurring items. Informational only — not financial advice.

Ask whether UPS's dividend is covered →

How United Parcel Service looks technically

United Parcel Service (UPS) is trading 2.1% below its 200-day average, the long-term trend line — a long-term downtrend. Its 50-day average crossed above its 200-day average about 160 trading days ago — a "golden cross", a bullish long-term signal. A trend is forming but not yet strong — ADX, a 0–100 trend-strength gauge, is 25 (a reading of 25+ marks a strong trend). Momentum is neutral — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 39, neither overbought (above 70) nor oversold (below 30). It made a new 20-day low about 4 trading days ago. It is 16.7% below its highest point of the past year.

Trend

8
Distance from the 200-dayit is trading 2.1% below its 200-day average, the long-term trend line — a long-term downtrend-2.1%
50-day moving averageits average price over the last 50 trading days — a short-term trend line — is $108.38$108.38
200-day moving averageits average price over the last 200 trading days — the long-term trend line — is $104.25$104.25
Swing structureeach recent peak has been lower than the one before it and each dip deeper — the pattern chart-watchers call a downtrend, which describes where price has already been and not where it goes nextlower highs and lower lows
Last swing turnits last significant turn was a swing low 14 calendar days ago — the swings before that are what the structure reading is measured on14 sessions
Wave structureits recent swings can be read as a five-part downward sequence — what Elliott-wave chartists call an impulse — now in the fourth leg, a pullback against that downward direction; the labelling fails if price closes above 102.83. It is the only labelling that fits, though not with textbook proportions, and it describes the swings already printed, not what comes next.possible downward five-wave sequence, in wave 4 (atypical proportions)
Since the 50/200 crossits 50-day average crossed above its 200-day average about 160 trading days ago — a "golden cross", a bullish long-term signal160 sessions
Trend strength (14-day ADX)a trend is forming but not yet strong — ADX, a 0–100 trend-strength gauge, is 25 (a reading of 25+ marks a strong trend)24.9

Momentum

3
14-day RSImomentum is neutral — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 39, neither overbought (above 70) nor oversold (below 30)39.1
Position in its 14-day rangeit is trading near the bottom of its 14-day range ($101.33 to $109.42) — its "stochastic" reading is 8 out of 100, where 0 would mean closing exactly at the 14-session low and 100 exactly at the high. This measures WHERE the price sits inside its recent range, which is a different question from the RSI beside it: RSI is a momentum gauge, measuring how FAST the price has been moving, so a stock can drift quietly to the bottom of its range with an ordinary RSI, or fall sharply and still sit in the middle. It has been slipping within that range over the last few sessions.8.4
Since the MACD crossed zeroMACD, a trend-momentum gauge, is in negative territory (momentum leaning bearish)21 sessions

Range

12
52-week highits highest closing price over the past year (about 252 trading days) was $122.41$122.41
From the 52-week highit is 16.7% below its 52-week high (its highest price of the past year)-16.7%
Above the 52-week lowit is 24.4% above its 52-week low (its lowest price of the past year)+24.4%
Below the 52-week highit is 16.7% below its highest point of the past year16.7%
Since a 20-day breakoutit made a new 20-day low about 4 trading days ago4 sessions
Since a 55-day breakoutit made a new 55-day low about 4 trading days ago4 sessions
All-time highits highest closing price on record is $233.72 (set on 2022-02-01)$233.72
Given back of the 52-week moveover the past year its closes ranged ($82.58 to $120.00), and it has given back around half of its rise from last year’s low — 48% of it. Chart-watchers call 61.8%-65% given back the "golden pocket" — for this company that is $95.68 to $96.87. It is watched widely enough that orders cluster there, which is the honest reason it matters; it is not a forecast.48.1%
From the all-time highit is 56.4% below its all-time high-56.4%
Nearest price levelit is trading 1.1% below a resistance level at $103.17 — a price it turned at 9 times since 2025-05-12, most recently on 2026-08-07. Since 2024-08-21 it has 7 such levels below the current price and 7 above. Levels like these describe where the price has reversed or paused before; they are not a forecast of where it will go.+1.1%
All-time lowits lowest closing price on record is $37.99 (set on 2009-03-09)$37.99
Above the all-time lowit is 168.5% above its all-time low+168.5%

Volatility

5
Band width vs its own 6 monthsday-to-day price swings are narrower than usual versus its own recent 6-month history (tighter than about 79% of it)21st percentile
Typical daily rangein a typical session it travels about $2.44 between its high and its low — about 2.4% of its price. That is its "average true range" over the last 14 sessions, which also counts the distance from the previous close, so a day that opens well away from yesterday counts as the large move it was$2.44
Bollinger bands (20-day, ±2σ)most of its recent trading has stayed between about $99.72 and $110.12 — the "Bollinger bands", a range drawn two standard deviations either side of its 20-day average price, which widens when the stock gets more volatile and narrows when it settles$99.72 – $104.92 – $110.12
Typical daily range (% of price)its price moves about 2.4% in a typical session — calmer than most companies we cover. This is the average gap between a session's high and low over the last 14 sessions, counting overnight moves, expressed against the current price so it can be compared with companies trading at any price2.4%
Stretch from the 200-day averageit is trading 0.9 daily ranges below its 200-day average price (2.2% below it in plain percentage terms) — a way of asking how far it has stretched from its own average in units of how far it normally moves in a day, so a calm company and a jumpy one can be compared on the same scale0.9 daily ranges below its 200-day average

Volume

1
Volume vs its 30-day averagetrading volume is about normal versus its 30-day average0.73×

Analyst

2
Change in the average price targetanalysts' average price target is unchanged from the prior reading0.0%
Change in the consensus ratingthe analyst consensus rating is unchanged since the prior readingunchanged

Candlestick patterns

3
Since a doji3 sessions ago it opened and closed at almost the same price after trading through a wider range — a "doji", the classic picture of buyers and sellers finishing the session level3 sessions ago
Since a hammer9 sessions ago, after a stretch of decline, it sold off hard during the session and then closed back near its high — a "hammer", the long lower wick showing the drop was bought back before the close9 sessions ago
Since a bearish engulfingtoday it opened above the previous session's close and finished below that session's open — a "bearish engulfing" pair, where one down day more than undid the up day before ittoday

Price gaps

2
Gap at the openit opened on 2026-08-21 0.6% above the previous session's close — an overnight gap, the part of the move that happened while the market was shut, and traded back through that level before the close+0.6%
Gap filleda 3.7% gap down opened on 2026-06-11 has been "filled" 48 sessions ago — price traded back through the level the gap left behind, and it closed again during the very session that opened it48 sessions ago

Price streaks

1
Closing streakit has closed lower 2 sessions in a row, a -0.83% move over the run — an unbroken run of down days, which describes what has already happened and says nothing about the next session2 sessions down

Relative strength

4
vs market, 1 monthover the past 1 month this stock lagged the market by 14.6 percentage points (the stock lost 12.3% while the market gained 2.3%)-14.7%
vs market, 3 monthsover the past 3 months this stock beat the market by 0.7 percentage points (the stock gained 3.8% while the market gained 3.1%)+0.7%
vs market, 6 monthsover the past 6 months this stock lagged the market by 23.7 percentage points (the stock lost 12.6% while the market gained 11.1%)-23.7%
vs market, 12 monthsover the past 12 months this stock lagged the market by 2.1 percentage points (the stock gained 18.4% while the market gained 20.5%)-2.1%

Signal agreement

2
Bullish technical signals2 of the 9 technical signals we can compute for it are currently in a bullish state: a "golden cross" — its 50-day average is above its 200-day, near the bottom of its 14-day range (oversold) — these describe past price behaviour, not a forecast2 of 9
Bearish technical signals4 of the 9 technical signals we can compute for it are currently in a bearish state: trading below its 200-day average, MACD momentum is negative, lagging the market over 6 months, trading below the Ichimoku cloud — these describe past price behaviour, not a forecast4 of 9

Trend (Ichimoku cloud)

1
Vs the Ichimoku cloudtrading 3.4% below the Ichimoku cloud — a band drawn from where its own highs and lows sat up to 2026-07-16 and projected forward over today's price, the side traders read as an established downtrend, with the band above acting as the level that would have to be cleared. The band itself is moderate, spanning 5.8% of the share price.-3.4%

Volume-weighted price

2
Vs this year’s average price paidthe price is 4% below the average price paid so far this year, so the typical buyer over that stretch is under water. That average is $105.75 — a volume-weighted average of daily closes over 157 sessions, not a true tick-by-tick VWAP.-3.5%
Vs the average paid since it last reportedthe price is 2% below the average price paid since it last reported on 2026-07-28 (its 8-K), so the typical buyer over that stretch is under water. That average is $104.60 — a volume-weighted average of daily closes over 19 sessions, not a true tick-by-tick VWAP.-2.5%

Price levels it has turned at before

UPS last closed at $102.01 on 2026-08-21. Since 2024-08-21 it has turned at 7 prices below its last close and 7 above; the 3 nearest below and the 3 nearest above are listed, nearest first.

LevelSideDistanceEvidence
$103.17Resistance1.1% above the last closeturned there 9 times · 2025-05-12 to 2026-08-07
$100.75Support1.2% below the last closeturned there twice · 2025-04-14 to 2025-10-28
$98.77Support3.2% below the last closeturned there four times · 2025-04-23 to 2026-01-02
$106.18Resistance4.1% above the last closeturned there twice · 2025-07-03 to 2026-08-14
$96.55Support5.3% below the last closeturned there twice · 2025-11-13 to 2026-05-04
$109.91Resistance7.7% above the last closeturned there five times · 2025-02-03 to 2026-08-04

A level is a price this company reversed or paused at more than once — they describe past behaviour, not a forecast of where the price will go.

Wave structure

Its recent swings can be read as a five-part downward sequence — what Elliott-wave chartists call an impulse — now in leg 4 of five, a pullback against that direction.

This labelling fails — stops being a possible reading at all — if it closes above $102.83.

It is the only labelling that fits these swings, though its proportions are not the textbook ones.

On past moves of this shape the leg has usually ended somewhere between $102.83 and $104.09 — that is where it has tended to end if the count holds, not a forecast of where the price goes.

This reading has stood for 2 trading days, since 2026-08-20.

Read from daily closes as of 2026-08-21.

An Elliott-wave count describes the swings already printed and the level that would disprove it. It is not a forecast, a target, or advice.

Based on daily closing prices as of 2026-08-21. Describes past price behavior only — informational, not financial advice.

Ask about UPS's technicals →

Analyst consensus

  • Consensus ratingBuy (2.17 mean, 1=Strong Buy…5=Strong Sell) — 26 analysts
  • Mean price target$115.96 range $76.00 – $135.00; median $117.50

Analyst estimates, as of 2026-08-17. These are third-party analyst opinions and price targets, aggregated — not a recommendation, prediction, or advice from stocks-llm. Informational only.

Analyst EPS estimate for UPS

  • Consensus EPS estimate$1.63 next reporting period, as of 2026-08-17

Change over time is not available yet: it needs two readings of the same reporting period at least 30 days apart, and we have been recording these estimates since 2026-08-04. An estimate for a DIFFERENT quarter is not a revision, so a reading from before the last report is never compared with one after it.

The consensus estimate for the next reporting period, and how it has moved between readings of that SAME period. A change is measured only between readings estimating one period — when a company reports, the consensus moves to the next quarter and the two numbers are not comparable. Informational only, not a forecast and not advice.

Ask how UPS's estimates have moved →

Key risks (from latest filing)

["Labor-related risks, including potential strikes, work stoppages, or slowdowns that could disrupt operations.","Exposure to volatile energy prices, particularly for diesel, jet fuel, and gasoline.","Susceptibility to broader economic conditions, global trade policy changes, and geopolitical instability."]

See UPS's biggest risks from its latest 10-Q →

What changed in the latest 10-Q

AI-assisted comparison of UPS's 10-Q filed 2026-05-06 against the prior one filed 2025-11-05.

Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)

  • Added:
    • Added reference to 2026 Q1 filing period (three months ended March 31, 2026) with new financial results: $21.2 billion revenue, $1.3 billion operating profit, 6.0% operating margin
    • Added disclosure about outsourcing of Ground Saver product to USPS and related network capacity actions
    • Added mention of volatile global markets and higher fuel costs from Middle East conflict in Q1 2026
    • Added reference to Efficiency Reimagined initiatives as end-to-end process redesign effort
    • Added details on international network enhancements: Incheon hub expansion, Taiwan logistics center opening, Europe ground speed improvements
    • Added statement about cost pressures expected to abate in Q2 2026
    • Added disclosure about February 2026 U.S. Supreme Court ruling invalidating certain tariffs and related monitoring
    • Added new non-GAAP adjustment table showing transformation costs of $55 million in Q1 2026 vs $58 million in Q1 2025, with zero goodwill/asset impairment charges in Q1 2026 vs $39 million in Q1 2025
    • Added $1.4 billion cash returned to shareholders through dividends in Q1 2026
    • Added non-GAAP adjusted diluted EPS of $1.07 after adjusting for $0.05 per share transformation costs
  • Removed:
    • Removed reference to Q3 2025 and nine-month 2025 periods (replaced with Q1 2026 comparisons to Q1 2025)
    • Removed detail about insourcing of SurePost product in first half of 2025
    • Removed mention of Frigo-Trans acquisition completed in Q1 2025
    • Removed reference to AHG acquisition completed in November 2025 (now referenced as completed in Q4 2025)
    • Removed detailed discussion of China to U.S. trade lane volume shifts
    • Removed reference to Coyote divestiture in Q3 2024 and its revenue impact
    • Removed disclosure about $1.0 billion share repurchase program and $4.0 billion dividends for nine-month 2025
    • Removed Q3 2024 comparative financial data and metrics
  • Reworded:
    • Changed from 'During the third quarter and first nine months of 2025' to 'During the first quarter of 2026'
    • Changed from 'we intend to reduce' to 'we expect to complete our targeted volume reduction' and specified 'by June 2026'
    • Changed from 'we have since replaced it with Ground Saver' to 'the outsourcing of last-mile delivery of a portion of our Ground Saver product to the United States Postal Service'
    • Changed from 'took pricing actions to manage Ground Saver volume and we are working to continue to reduce our costs' to 'outsourcing of last-mile delivery of a portion of our Ground Saver product'
    • Changed from 'completed the previously announced acquisition of Andlauer Healthcare Group' to 'continued a number of initiatives supporting growth' and 'advanced the integration of Andlauer Healthcare Group'
    • Changed description of acquisitions from listing Frigo-Trans and AHG separately to summarizing as supporting healthcare logistics capabilities
    • Changed from listing trade policy as primary macro challenge to mentioning 'complex macro environment, including volatile global markets, higher fuel costs arising from the conflict in the Middle East'
    • Changed from discussing Ground Saver insourcing pressure to discussing transition costs and excess operational staffing from outsourcing Ground Saver
    • Expanded Network Reconfiguration description to include 'an end-to-end process redesign' and linking to Efficiency Reimagined initiatives
  • Notes:
    • The two filings compare different fiscal periods (Q1 2026 vs Q3 2025/nine months 2025), so some removals reflect period-specific content rather than deliberate deletions
    • The AHG acquisition disclosure changed from 'completed in November 2025' to 'advanced the integration' because the newer filing discusses Q1 2026 operations post-acquisition
    • Ground Saver product treatment fundamentally shifted from insourced product to partially outsourced to USPS, representing a strategic change rather than just wording adjustment

Risk Factors

  • Added:
    • Added reference to "geopolitical uncertainty, tensions and/or conflicts in or arising from various countries and regions, including the European Union, Ukraine, the Russian Federation, the Middle East and the Trans-Pacific region" in the forward-looking statements risk discussion (2026-05-06 filing)
    • Added language regarding "government shutdowns" as a standalone risk factor alongside tariffs and trade policy changes (2026-05-06 filing)
  • Reworded:
    • Changed reference from "our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024" to "our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025" (2026-05-06 filing)
    • Changed reference from "filings with the SEC" to "filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission" for consistency (2026-05-06 filing)
    • Expanded economic conditions risk language from "new or increased tariffs or government shutdowns" to "new or increased tariffs, government shutdowns, or geopolitical uncertainty, tensions and/or conflicts" (2026-05-06 filing)
  • Notes:
    • The provided newer filing text appears truncated and does not include the actual Item 1A. Risk Factors section content, only page references and cautionary statement. Comparison is limited to the Forward-Looking Statements section that is available.
    • The older filing text similarly shows only page references and cautionary statement without the full Risk Factors section content.

AI-assisted comparison of two SEC filing sections. It describes wording and theme changes only, makes no materiality, legal, or investment judgement, and is not financial advice. Informational only — not financial advice.

Ask what changed in UPS's latest 10-Q →

Insider activity (SEC Form 4)

No open-market insider purchases or sales are on record for UPS — recent Form 4 activity was compensation-related (awards, option exercises, or tax withholding), not open-market buying or selling.

View full insider trading history → View SEC Form 3/4/5 filings

Only open-market purchases (SEC code P) and sales (code S) are counted here. Option exercises, vesting/awards, gifts, and shares withheld for taxes are excluded — they are compensation or mechanical, not open-market conviction. Sales may be planned and non-discretionary (e.g. a Rule 10b5-1 plan) and are not necessarily bearish; open-market buying is not a recommendation to buy. Informational only — not financial advice.

Congressional trading disclosures

U.S. House members publicly disclose their own, their spouse's, and dependent children's stock transactions under the STOCK Act. We hold 46 matched disclosures for UPS from U.S. House Clerk Periodic Transaction Report filings.

Congressional trading disclosures →

Institutional ownership (13F)

6 institutional 13F filers reported holding UPS as of 2026-03-31 (quarter-end position, filed within 45 days).

  • Distinct 13F filers 6
  • Reported shares held 123,142,665
  • Reported value $12,114,775,442

reported quarterly holdings change (2025-12-31 → 2026-03-31): 0 new, 3 increased, 3 decreased, 1 exited. Change counts cover only managers that filed 13F reports in BOTH quarters, derived between two quarter-end snapshots — not same-day trades; a single manager is never said to have "bought" or "sold".

Institutional holdings are quarter-end long positions reported on SEC Form 13F-HR, filed up to 45 days after the quarter ends — they are delayed, are not real-time trades, exclude short positions and most non-US securities, and are not investment advice. Any increase/decrease is a reported change between two quarterly snapshots, not a same-day purchase or sale. These are quarter-end snapshots from the 13F filings on SEC EDGAR, filed within 45 days — not real-time, and any change is a difference between two quarterly reports, not a same-day trade. Informational only — not financial advice.

Ask about UPS's institutional holders →

Short interest (FINRA)

UPS had 23,812,182 shares of reported short interest as of the 2026-07-31 FINRA settlement date (delayed, bi-monthly; not real-time).

Short interest as a percent of shares outstanding is not shown for UPS because the newest share count we hold predates that settlement by more than 180 days, and a buyback or issuance in between would move the base. The reported figures above are unaffected.

  • Reported short interest (shares) 23,812,182
  • Prior settlement (shares) 24,444,387
  • Reported change -2.59%
  • Days to cover (reported) 3.86

Reported to FINRA as of the 2026-07-31 settlement date. Short interest is reported to FINRA and published on a delayed, bi-monthly schedule (as of a settlement date, disseminated roughly eight business days later) — it is NOT real-time, does not cover every venue or all US trading, and is not a short-squeeze prediction or investment advice. Days-to-cover is the value FINRA reports; percent of float is not shown because the source file carries no share-count denominator — where a percent appears it is of shares OUTSTANDING, the larger base, and is therefore a floor on percent of float. Informational only — not financial advice.

Ask about UPS's short interest →

Competitors & peers

AI-enriched competitor set. Linked names are companies covered by stocks-llm; other named peers are shown for reference only.

Not quite? Describe exactly what you want →

Compare UPS vs…

United Parcel Service is found in…

Frequently asked questions

What does United Parcel Service (UPS) do?

United Parcel Service is a global leader in logistics, providing a broad range of solutions including the transportation of packages and freight, the facilitation of international trade, and the deployment of advanced technology to manage the world of commerce. The company operates one of the largest package delivery networks in the world, connecting supply chains across domestic and international markets.

What sector is United Parcel Service (UPS) in?

United Parcel Service (UPS) is classified in the Industrials sector. Its industry is Air Freight & Logistics. It trades on NYSE.

Does UPS pay a dividend?

Yes — United Parcel Service (UPS) pays a dividend, with an indicated yield of about 4.26% and at least 5 years of non-decreasing per-share dividends (SEC EDGAR XBRL) — we do not hold the year before it, so the real streak may be longer (market data, as of 2026-08-24). Informational only — not financial advice.

Who are United Parcel Service's (UPS) competitors?

Notable peers of United Parcel Service (UPS) include FedEx, DHL Group, Amazon, United States Postal Service and XPO. This peer set is informational only — not financial advice.

Has there been recent Congressional stock trading in UPS?

Yes — we hold 46 matched STOCK Act disclosures for UPS from U.S. House Clerk Periodic Transaction Report filings. These are legally-required disclosures (often filed 30–45 days after the trade), may belong to a U.S. House member, their spouse, or a dependent child, and are not an indicator of company performance or investment advice.

Is United Parcel Service (UPS) overbought or oversold right now?

United Parcel Service (UPS) is currently neither overbought nor oversold — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 39, in the neutral middle (as of 2026-08-21). RSI describes recent price momentum, not a forecast — informational only, not financial advice.

Where does stocks-llm's data on UPS come from?

Fundamentals and prices come from market data, as of 2026-08-24; company filings and profile facts come from SEC EDGAR. All figures are delayed daily-close data shown with their as-of date — informational only, not financial advice.

Fundamentals: market data, as of 2026-08-24. Filings: SEC EDGAR. Prices are delayed daily-close data.

Last updated 2026-08-21.

Informational only — NOT financial advice. All figures are delayed daily-close data from SEC EDGAR & market data, shown with their as-of date.

Research stocks in your own words.

Informational only — NOT financial advice.

ScreenersBlogPrivacyiOS app