Stocks below their vwap since earnings

As of 2026-08-26, 1094 US-listed companies match this screen: under water since its last earnings report (below the anchored vwap). The closest matches right now: INDP, 68% below the average price paid since it last reported on 2026-03-17 (its 10-K), that average is $3.57, a volume-weighted average of daily closes over 113 sessions, so buyers since that report are on average under water.; AVB, 63% below the average price paid since it last reported on 2026-07-23 (its 8-K), that average is $185.27, a volume-weighted average of daily closes over 18 sessions, so buyers since that report are on average under water.; IESC, 50% below the average price paid since it last reported on 2026-07-31 (its 10-Q), that average is $664.71, a volume-weighted average of daily closes over 19 sessions, so buyers since that report are on average under water.; AREN, 47% below the average price paid since it last reported on 2026-08-10 (its 10-Q), that average is $1.73, a volume-weighted average of daily closes over 13 sessions, so buyers since that report are on average under water.; MX, 43% below the average price paid since it last reported on 2026-04-28 (its 8-K), that average is $5.74, a volume-weighted average of daily closes over 81 sessions, so buyers since that report are on average under water.; SLQT, 41% below the average price paid since it last reported on 2026-05-05 (its 10-Q), that average is $0.9376, a volume-weighted average of daily closes over 76 sessions, so buyers since that report are on average under water.; SSTK, 37% below the average price paid since it last reported on 2026-04-28 (its 10-Q), that average is $8.85, a volume-weighted average of daily closes over 82 sessions, so buyers since that report are on average under water.; EYPT, 37% below the average price paid since it last reported on 2026-08-05 (its 10-Q), that average is $7.91, a volume-weighted average of daily closes over 14 sessions, so buyers since that report are on average under water.; SITC, 36% below the average price paid since it last reported on 2026-02-26 (its 10-K), that average is $4.77, a volume-weighted average of daily closes over 126 sessions, so buyers since that report are on average under water.; ALMU, 36% below the average price paid since it last reported on 2026-05-13 (its 10-Q), that average is $21.63, a volume-weighted average of daily closes over 69 sessions, so buyers since that report are on average under water.; RFIL, 34% below the average price paid since it last reported on 2026-06-15 (its 10-Q), that average is $15.99, a volume-weighted average of daily closes over 50 sessions, so buyers since that report are on average under water.; AIV, 30% below the average price paid since it last reported on 2026-03-02 (its 10-K), that average is $3.64, a volume-weighted average of daily closes over 122 sessions, so buyers since that report are on average under water.. This is a deterministic technical screen over daily closing prices, it describes recent price behavior only, not a buy or sell signal. 20 covered companies were not evaluated for this screen because their price series end on or before 2026-08-21 (CCRN, CPRX, EEX, ESPR, GTLS, KORE, LBRDK, LPRO, MDV, NFBK, NSA, NUVL, and 8 more), at least 3 trading sessions behind the 2026-08-26 session the rest of the catalog carries. A technical signal is a claim about the present, so it is not asserted from a series that stops before it. Those companies keep the readings they have on their own page, with the as-of date they were computed from. 11 covered companies were not evaluated for this screen (AKTS, ANGX, FRMI, GEMI, HAWK, MVIS, NRDY, SHAZ, SOLS, SPRB, TSEOQ) because our price history for these companies shows an unadjusted split or scale break. Every indicator read from such a series is an artifact of that break rather than a fact about the company, so none of them is asserted here, which is why the same companies have no 1-year return on their own page either.