Dolby Laboratories (DLB)
Information Technology · audio and imaging technology licensing · NYSE
Dolby Laboratories is a global leader in audio and visual innovation, licensing essential media technologies that power high-quality entertainment experiences in cinemas, homes, and mobile devices.
What Dolby Laboratories does
Dolby Laboratories specializes in audio and imaging technologies that enhance entertainment experiences across various media platforms. The company derives the majority of its revenue through licensing its intellectual property, which includes sophisticated audio processing (such as Dolby Digital and Dolby Atmos) and video imaging standards (such as Dolby Vision), to consumer electronics manufacturers, service providers, and content creators. Additionally, Dolby provides professional hardware and software products and services for the cinema, broadcast, and digital media industries.
Themes: audio technology licensing, video imaging standards, digital media infrastructure, immersive entertainment experiences
Fundamentals
- Price$58.45 as of 2026-10-08 close
- Market cap$5.5B as of 2026-07-24 (share count; price 2026-10-08)
- 1-year return-17.7% 2025-10-08 close $71.01 → 2026-10-08 close $58.45
- P/E24.81 as of 2026-10-08
- Net margin+18.9% FY2025, SEC XBRL
- Gross margin+88.1% FY2025, SEC XBRL
- ROE+9.7% FY2025, SEC XBRL
- Debt / equity0.00 as of 2026-09-03
- Revenue growth (YoY)+0.6% as of 2026-09-03
- Revenue CAGR (3y)+2.5% SEC XBRL
- Beta0.75 as of 2026-09-03
- Last reported earnings2026-07-30 SEC EDGAR Form 8-K (Item 2.02)
Dividend: yield +2.5%; 11-year non-decreasing per-share dividend streak (SEC XBRL).
How DLB compares in its sector
- price-to-earnings ratiomiddle range 253 covered Information Technology peers, as of 2026-10-08
- net profit margintop 25% 380 covered Information Technology peers, as of 2026-09-03
- operating margintop 25% 375 covered Information Technology peers, as of 2026-09-03
- gross margintop 10% 311 covered Information Technology peers, as of 2026-09-03
- return on equitymiddle range 370 covered Information Technology peers, as of 2026-09-03
- 3-year revenue CAGRmiddle range 385 covered Information Technology peers
- indicated dividend yieldtop 25% 108 covered Information Technology peers, as of 2026-09-03
- free cash flow (absolute dollars, latest fiscal year)middle range 382 covered Information Technology peers, as of FY2025
Position among covered Information Technology companies that report each metric (minimum 5 peers). A relative position within our covered catalog — not a valuation, quality, or investment judgment. A higher percentile is simply a higher value (for P/E, more expensive on earnings — never "better"). Informational only.
Top 10 scores & list membership
DLB is not currently in any published Top 10 list. Its scores are below.
Top 10 score
54.4 #498 of 1,379 scored · #87 of 203 in Information Technology
Financial health 92nd (debt to equity 0, free cash flow margin 32.3%) and valuation 65th (price to earnings 24.8, price to book 2.6); weakest is growth (23rd, revenue growth year over year 0.6%, 3-year revenue CAGR 2.5%).
Scores as of 8 Oct 2026. Each bar is a percentile: how this company ranked against every company the score ranked, 0–100. A list is a published formula and its output, not a recommendation. Method version 4.
Dividend coverage (FY2025)
Covered by reported results. In FY2025, DLB's dividend was covered by reported results (earnings payout 50%, free-cash-flow payout 29%). This describes past coverage, not a forecast.
- Earnings payout50% dividends / net income
- Free-cash-flow payout29% dividends / (operating cash flow − capex)
Coverage derived from reported SEC EDGAR XBRL figures for FY2025 (dividends paid vs. net income and free cash flow, same fiscal year). This describes PAST coverage for one fiscal year — it does not predict whether a dividend will be maintained, raised, or cut, and a one-year payout ratio can be distorted by non-recurring items. Informational only — not financial advice.
How Dolby Laboratories looks technically
Dolby Laboratories (DLB) is trading 2.2% below its 200-day average, the long-term trend line — a long-term downtrend. Its 50-day average crossed above its 200-day average about 5 trading days ago — a "golden cross", a bullish long-term signal. There is no clear trend right now — the price is choppy (ADX, a 0–100 trend-strength gauge, is 12, below the 25 that marks a real trend). Momentum is neutral — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 45, neither overbought (above 70) nor oversold (below 30). MACD, a trend-momentum gauge, turned bullish about 4 trading days ago (its momentum flipped positive). It made a new 20-day low about 14 trading days ago. It is 19.9% below its highest point of the past year.
Trend
8
| Distance from the 200-day | it is trading 2.2% below its 200-day average, the long-term trend line — a long-term downtrend | -2.2% |
|---|---|---|
| 50-day moving average | its average price over the last 50 trading days — a short-term trend line — is $60.68 | $60.68 |
| 200-day moving average | its average price over the last 200 trading days — the long-term trend line — is $59.75 | $59.75 |
| Swing structure | each recent peak has been lower than the one before it and each dip deeper — the pattern chart-watchers call a downtrend, which describes where price has already been and not where it goes next | lower highs and lower lows |
| Last swing turn | its last significant turn was a swing low 14 calendar days ago — the swings before that are what the structure reading is measured on | 14 sessions |
| Wave structure | its recent swings can be read as a five-part downward sequence — what Elliott-wave chartists call an impulse — now in the fourth leg, a pullback against that downward direction; the labelling fails if price closes above 60.02. It is one of several labellings that fit, and it describes the swings already printed, not what comes next. The same swings also read as a completed three-part correction. | possible downward five-wave sequence, in wave 4 (one of several readings) |
| Since the 50/200 cross | its 50-day average crossed above its 200-day average about 5 trading days ago — a "golden cross", a bullish long-term signal | 5 sessions |
| Trend strength (14-day ADX) | there is no clear trend right now — the price is choppy (ADX, a 0–100 trend-strength gauge, is 12, below the 25 that marks a real trend) | 11.6 |
Momentum
3
| 14-day RSI | momentum is neutral — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 45, neither overbought (above 70) nor oversold (below 30) | 45.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Position in its 14-day range | it is trading in the upper half of its 14-day range ($56.39 to $59.97) — its "stochastic" reading is 58 out of 100, where 0 would mean closing exactly at the 14-session low and 100 exactly at the high. This measures WHERE the price sits inside its recent range, which is a different question from the RSI beside it: RSI is a momentum gauge, measuring how FAST the price has been moving, so a stock can drift quietly to the bottom of its range with an ordinary RSI, or fall sharply and still sit in the middle. It has been climbing within that range over the last few sessions. | 57.5 |
| Since the MACD crossed zero | MACD, a trend-momentum gauge, turned bullish about 4 trading days ago (its momentum flipped positive) | 4 sessions |
Range
12
| 52-week high | its highest closing price over the past year (about 252 trading days) was $72.96 | $72.96 |
|---|---|---|
| From the 52-week high | it is 19.9% below its 52-week high (its highest price of the past year) | -19.9% |
| Above the 52-week low | it is 21.1% above its 52-week low (its lowest price of the past year) | +21.1% |
| Below the 52-week high | it is 19.9% below its highest point of the past year | 19.9% |
| Since a 20-day breakout | it made a new 20-day low about 14 trading days ago | 14 sessions |
| Since a 55-day breakout | it made a new 55-day high about 32 trading days ago | 32 sessions |
| All-time high | its highest closing price on record is $104.74 (set on 2021-05-03) | $104.74 |
| Given back of the 52-week move | over the past year its closes ranged ($48.51 to $72.67), and it has recovered roughly a third of its fall from last year’s high — 41% of it. Chart-watchers call 61.8%-65% given back the "golden pocket" — for this company that is $63.44 to $64.21. It is watched widely enough that orders cluster there, which is the honest reason it matters; it is not a forecast. | 41.1% |
| From the all-time high | it is 44.2% below its all-time high | -44.2% |
| Nearest price level | it is trading 1.3% above a support level at $57.70 — a price it turned at twice since 2026-03-27, most recently on 2026-05-27. Since 2024-10-08 it has 2 such levels below the current price and 12 above. Levels like these describe where the price has reversed or paused before; they are not a forecast of where it will go. | -1.3% |
| All-time low | its lowest closing price on record is $14.50 (set on 2005-09-02) | $14.50 |
| Above the all-time low | it is 303.1% above its all-time low | +303.1% |
Volatility
5
| Band width vs its own 6 months | day-to-day price swings are about average versus its own recent 6-month history | 38th percentile |
|---|---|---|
| Typical daily range | in a typical session it travels about $1.50 between its high and its low — about 2.6% of its price. That is its "average true range" over the last 14 sessions, which also counts the distance from the previous close, so a day that opens well away from yesterday counts as the large move it was | $1.50 |
| Bollinger bands (20-day, ±2σ) | most of its recent trading has stayed between about $55.62 and $62.18 — the "Bollinger bands", a range drawn two standard deviations either side of its 20-day average price, which widens when the stock gets more volatile and narrows when it settles | $55.62 – $58.90 – $62.18 |
| Typical daily range (% of price) | its price moves about 2.6% in a typical session — calmer than most companies we cover. This is the average gap between a session's high and low over the last 14 sessions, counting overnight moves, expressed against the current price so it can be compared with companies trading at any price | 2.6% |
| Stretch from the 200-day average | it is trading 0.9 daily ranges below its 200-day average price (2.2% below it in plain percentage terms) — a way of asking how far it has stretched from its own average in units of how far it normally moves in a day, so a calm company and a jumpy one can be compared on the same scale | 0.9 daily ranges below its 200-day average |
Volume
1
| Volume vs its 30-day average | trading volume is about normal versus its 30-day average | 1.08× |
|---|
Analyst
2
| Change in the average price target | analysts' average price target is unchanged from the prior reading | 0.0% |
|---|---|---|
| Change in the consensus rating | not available for this company yet | n/a |
Candlestick patterns
2
| Since a doji | 1 session ago it opened and closed at almost the same price after trading through a wider range — a "doji", the classic picture of buyers and sellers finishing the session level | 1 session ago |
|---|---|---|
| Since a bearish engulfing | 2 sessions ago it opened above the previous session's close and finished below that session's open — a "bearish engulfing" pair, where one down day more than undid the up day before it | 2 sessions ago |
Price gaps
3
| Gap at the open | it opened on 2026-10-08 0.3% below the previous session's close — an overnight gap, the part of the move that happened while the market was shut, and traded back through that level before the close | -0.3% |
|---|---|---|
| Open gap | it gapped 9.2% above the previous close 48 sessions ago and has not traded back through the level it left behind at 51.78 — an "unfilled gap", which describes a price range no trade has since crossed and is not a forecast that it will be crossed | +9.2% |
| Gap filled | a 2.4% gap down opened on 2026-08-27 has been "filled" 18 sessions ago — price traded back through the level the gap left behind, and it took 11 sessions to close | 18 sessions ago |
Price streaks
1
| Closing streak | it closed higher in its latest session, after a session that did not close higher — a single up day rather than a run | 1 session up |
|---|
Relative strength
4
| vs market, 1 month | over the past 1 month this stock lagged the market by 7.3 percentage points (the stock lost 6.2% while the market gained 1.0%) | -7.3% |
|---|---|---|
| vs market, 3 months | over the past 3 months this stock beat the market by 13.4 percentage points (the stock gained 17.2% while the market gained 3.8%) | +13.3% |
| vs market, 6 months | over the past 6 months this stock lagged the market by 22.2 percentage points (the stock lost 4.7% while the market gained 17.5%) | -22.2% |
| vs market, 12 months | over the past 12 months this stock lagged the market by 32.7 percentage points (the stock lost 17.7% while the market gained 15.0%) | -32.7% |
Signal agreement
2
| Bullish technical signals | 2 of the 9 technical signals we can compute for it are currently in a bullish state: a "golden cross" — its 50-day average is above its 200-day, MACD momentum is positive — these describe past price behaviour, not a forecast | 2 of 9 |
|---|---|---|
| Bearish technical signals | 2 of the 9 technical signals we can compute for it are currently in a bearish state: trading below its 200-day average, lagging the market over 6 months — these describe past price behaviour, not a forecast | 2 of 9 |
Trend (Ichimoku cloud)
1
| Vs the Ichimoku cloud | trading inside the Ichimoku cloud — a band drawn from where its own highs and lows sat up to 2026-09-01 and projected forward over today's price, the zone traders read as unresolved — neither side has established a trend, and the band is where that gets settled. The band itself is moderate, spanning 6.3% of the share price. | 0.0% |
|---|
Volume-weighted price
2
| Vs this year’s average price paid | the price is 1% below the average price paid so far this year, so the typical buyer over that stretch is under water. That average is $59.15 — a volume-weighted average of daily closes over 190 sessions, not a true tick-by-tick VWAP. | -1.2% |
|---|---|---|
| Vs the average paid since it last reported | the price is 4% below the average price paid since it last reported on 2026-07-30 (its 10-Q), so the typical buyer over that stretch is under water. That average is $60.59 — a volume-weighted average of daily closes over 50 sessions, not a true tick-by-tick VWAP. | -3.5% |
Price levels it has turned at before
DLB last closed at $58.45 on 2026-10-08. Since 2024-10-08 it has turned at 2 prices below its last close and 12 above; the 2 nearest below and the 3 nearest above are listed, nearest first.
| Level | Side | Distance | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| $57.70 | Support | 1.3% below the last close | turned there twice · 2026-03-27 to 2026-05-27 |
| $60.01 | Resistance | 2.7% above the last close | turned there four times · 2026-01-29 to 2026-09-01 |
| $56.06 | Support | 4.1% below the last close | turned there twice · 2026-05-01 to 2026-09-24 |
| $62.42 | Resistance | 6.8% above the last close | turned there twice · 2026-02-23 to 2026-04-23 |
| $64.44 | Resistance | 10.3% above the last close | turned there four times · 2025-10-30 to 2026-01-12 |
A level is a price this company reversed or paused at more than once — they describe past behaviour, not a forecast of where the price will go.
Wave structure
Its recent swings can be read as a five-part downward sequence — what Elliott-wave chartists call an impulse — now in leg 4 of five, a pullback against that direction.
This labelling fails — stops being a possible reading at all — if it closes above $60.02.
This is one of several labellings that fit the same swings, so treat it as a reading rather than the reading. It was chosen from 2 labellings that survived the rules, counting shorter readings of the same bars.
On past moves of this shape the leg has usually ended somewhere between $58.59 and $60.02 — that is where it has tended to end if the count holds, not a forecast of where the price goes.
Alternate reading: The same swings also read as a completed three-part correction, which fails on a close below $56.39.
This reading has stood for 6 trading days, since 2026-10-01.
Read from daily closes as of 2026-10-08.
An Elliott-wave count describes the swings already printed and the level that would disprove it. It is not a forecast, a target, or advice.
Screens: Trading below the 200-day moving average · Recent golden cross (50-day crossed above 200-day) · MACD just crossed bullish (12/26/9) · trendless / choppy (low ADX) · lagging the market · Trading at this year’s average price paid (anchored VWAP) | Learn: moving average · golden cross · adx · rsi · macd · breakout · fifty two week high low
Based on daily closing prices as of 2026-10-08. Describes past price behavior only — informational, not financial advice.
Analyst consensus
- Mean price target$79.00 range $62.00 – $90.00; median $85.00
Analyst estimates, as of 2026-10-08. These are third-party analyst opinions and price targets, aggregated — not a recommendation, prediction, or advice from stocks-llm. Informational only.
Analyst EPS estimate for DLB
- Consensus EPS estimate$1.20 next reporting period, as of 2026-10-08
- Estimate change, 30 days-$0.00167 (-0.1%) from $1.20, on 2026-09-03, 35-day window
- Readings revised upward0% of 6 comparable readings
The consensus estimate for the next reporting period, and how it has moved between readings of that SAME period. A change is measured only between readings estimating one period — when a company reports, the consensus moves to the next quarter and the two numbers are not comparable. Informational only, not a forecast and not advice.
Key risks (from latest filing)
["Reliance on licensing of intellectual property to original equipment manufacturers (OEMs).","Potential impact of changes in consumer behavior and technology adoption in the media and entertainment landscape.","Exposure to global economic conditions and geopolitical risks that may affect consumer electronics demand."]
What changed in the latest 10-Q
AI-assisted comparison of DLB's 10-Q filed 2026-07-30 against the prior one filed 2026-04-30.
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
- Reworded:
- The newer filing (filed 2026-07-30) reports revenue data for the fiscal quarter ended June 26, 2026 and fiscal year-to-date period ended June 26, 2026, while the older filing (filed 2026-04-30) reports revenue data for the fiscal quarter ended March 27, 2026 and fiscal year-to-date period ended March 27, 2026.
- In the revenue composition table, the newer filing (filed 2026-07-30) shows Licensing revenue of $282,351 (93%) and Products and services revenue of $22,644 (7%) for the fiscal quarter, with total revenue of $304,995; the older filing (filed 2026-04-30) shows Licensing revenue of $372,245 (94%) and Products and services revenue of $23,385 (6%) for the fiscal quarter, with total revenue of $395,630.
- In the revenue composition table, the newer filing (filed 2026-07-30) shows fiscal year-to-date Licensing revenue of $974,367 (93%), Products and services revenue of $72,964 (7%), and total revenue of $1,047,331; the older filing (filed 2026-04-30) shows fiscal year-to-date Licensing revenue of $692,016 (93%), Products and services revenue of $50,320 (7%), and total revenue of $742,336.
- The newer filing (filed 2026-07-30) states it generated over 90% of revenue in the third quarters of fiscal 2026 and fiscal 2025, and the fiscal year-to-date periods ended June 26, 2026 and June 27, 2025; the older filing (filed 2026-04-30) states it generated over 90% of revenue in the second quarters of fiscal 2026 and fiscal 2025, and the fiscal year-to-date periods ended March 27, 2026 and March 28, 2025.
- The newer filing (filed 2026-07-30) uses comparative quarter dates June 26, 2026 and June 27, 2025 in the table, while the older filing (filed 2026-04-30) uses comparative quarter dates March 27, 2026 and March 28, 2025.
- The newer filing (filed 2026-07-30) ends the provided MD&A excerpt mid-sentence after the licensing revenue percentage discussion, while the older filing (filed 2026-04-30) similarly ends mid-sentence at the same point in the structure.
- Notes:
- The provided texts are excerpts that appear to be cut off in the Licensing section; the comparison is limited to the portions supplied.
- The newer filing text appears to start mid-document at page 39 and includes the Table of Contents marker, while the older filing text starts at page 38 with the same marker; this difference reflects pagination rather than substantive content.
Risk Factors
- Notes:
- Both texts are truncated at the same point mid-sentence ('Consolidation among the major motion picture studios may impact the number of films released theatrical'), so only the portion up to that point could be compared.
- The only observed difference between the texts is the page number on the line preceding 'Table of Contents' (63 in the newer filing vs. 62 in the older filing), which is a formatting artifact not attributable to a substantive risk factor change.
- No changes were detected in the risk factor language within the scope of the provided excerpts.
AI-assisted comparison of two SEC filing sections. It describes wording and theme changes only, makes no materiality, legal, or investment judgement, and is not financial advice. Informational only — not financial advice.
Insider activity (SEC Form 4)
0 open-market purchases and 9 open-market sales by insiders in the last 90 days, of which we have read Form 4 filings through 2026-10-04. The 5 days since 2026-10-04 have not been checked yet.
- Last 30 days · read to 2026-10-040 buys · 2 sells ($450690) — 1 selling insider
- Last 90 days · read to 2026-10-040 buys · 9 sells ($2M) — 3 selling insiders
- Last 180 days · read to 2026-10-040 buys · 19 sells ($4M) — 5 selling insiders
Activity heuristic: net selling (a transparent product heuristic from the counts above, not a prediction or advice)
Most recent open-market transaction: 2026-10-01. Based on Form 4 filings read through 2026-10-04; anything filed since is not yet included.
View full insider trading history → View SEC Form 3/4/5 filingsAsk about DLB's insider activity →
Only open-market purchases (SEC code P) and sales (code S) are counted here. Option exercises, vesting/awards, gifts, and shares withheld for taxes are excluded — they are compensation or mechanical, not open-market conviction. Sales may be planned and non-discretionary (e.g. a Rule 10b5-1 plan) and are not necessarily bearish; open-market buying is not a recommendation to buy. Informational only — not financial advice.
U.S. House trading disclosures
U.S. House members publicly disclose their own, their spouse's, and dependent children's stock transactions under the STOCK Act. We hold 4 matched disclosures for DLB from U.S. House Clerk Periodic Transaction Report filings.
U.S. House trading disclosures →Institutional ownership (13F)
5 institutional 13F filers reported holding DLB as of 2026-06-30 (quarter-end position, filed within 45 days).
- Distinct 13F filers 5
- Reported shares held 11,863,203
- Reported value $623,767,216
reported quarterly holdings change (2026-03-31 → 2026-06-30): 1 new, 4 increased, 0 decreased, 0 exited. Change counts cover only managers that filed 13F reports in BOTH quarters, derived between two quarter-end snapshots — not same-day trades; a single manager is never said to have "bought" or "sold".
Institutional holdings are quarter-end long positions reported on SEC Form 13F-HR, filed up to 45 days after the quarter ends — they are delayed, are not real-time trades, exclude short positions and most non-US securities, and are not investment advice. Any increase/decrease is a reported change between two quarterly snapshots, not a same-day purchase or sale. These are quarter-end snapshots from the 13F filings on SEC EDGAR, filed within 45 days — not real-time, and any change is a difference between two quarterly reports, not a same-day trade. Informational only — not financial advice.
Ask about DLB's institutional holders → See what each manager we track holds →
Short interest (FINRA)
DLB had 5,530,847 shares of reported short interest as of the 2026-09-15 FINRA settlement date (delayed, bi-monthly; not real-time).
Short interest as a percent of shares outstanding is not shown for DLB because we do not hold a verified share count to divide it by. The reported figures above are unaffected.
- Reported short interest (shares) 5,530,847
- Prior settlement (shares) 5,532,041
- Reported change -0.02%
- Days to cover (reported) 6.01
Reported to FINRA as of the 2026-09-15 settlement date. Short interest is reported to FINRA and published on a delayed, bi-monthly schedule (as of a settlement date, disseminated roughly eight business days later) — it is NOT real-time, does not cover every venue or all US trading, and is not a short-squeeze prediction or investment advice. Days-to-cover is the value FINRA reports; percent of float is not shown because the source file carries no share-count denominator — where a percent appears it is of shares OUTSTANDING, the larger base, and is therefore a floor on percent of float. Informational only — not financial advice.
Competitors & peers
- DTS (Xperi)
- Technicolor Creative Studios
- Fraunhofer IIS
- InterDigital (IDCC)
- Apple (AAPL)
- Google (GOOGL)
- Sony (SONY)
AI-enriched competitor set. Linked names are companies covered by stocks-llm; other named peers are shown for reference only.
Compare DLB vs…
Frequently asked questions
What does Dolby Laboratories (DLB) do?
Dolby Laboratories specializes in audio and imaging technologies that enhance entertainment experiences across various media platforms. The company derives the majority of its revenue through licensing its intellectual property, which includes sophisticated audio processing (such as Dolby Digital and Dolby Atmos) and video imaging standards (such as Dolby Vision), to consumer electronics manufacturers, service providers, and content creators.
What sector is Dolby Laboratories (DLB) in?
Dolby Laboratories (DLB) is classified in the Information Technology sector. Its industry is audio and imaging technology licensing. It trades on NYSE.
Does DLB pay a dividend?
Yes — Dolby Laboratories (DLB) pays a dividend, with an indicated yield of about 2.50% and 11-year non-decreasing per-share dividend streak (SEC EDGAR XBRL) (market data, as of 2026-09-03). Informational only — not financial advice.
Who are Dolby Laboratories's (DLB) competitors?
Notable peers of Dolby Laboratories (DLB) include DTS (Xperi), Technicolor Creative Studios, Fraunhofer IIS, InterDigital and Apple. This peer set is informational only — not financial advice.
Has there been recent U.S. House stock trading in DLB?
Yes — we hold 4 matched STOCK Act disclosures for DLB from U.S. House Clerk Periodic Transaction Report filings. These are legally-required disclosures (often filed 30–45 days after the trade), may belong to a U.S. House member, their spouse, or a dependent child, and are not an indicator of company performance or investment advice.
Is Dolby Laboratories (DLB) overbought or oversold right now?
Dolby Laboratories (DLB) is currently neither overbought nor oversold — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 45, in the neutral middle (as of 2026-10-08). RSI describes recent price momentum, not a forecast — informational only, not financial advice.
Where does stocks-llm's data on DLB come from?
Fundamentals come from SEC XBRL company filings for the figures marked with a fiscal year, and market data, as of 2026-09-03 for the rest; prices are market data, as of 2026-09-03; company filings and profile facts come from SEC EDGAR. All figures are delayed daily-close data shown with their as-of date — informational only, not financial advice.
Fundamentals: SEC XBRL company filings for the figures marked with a fiscal year, and market data, as of 2026-09-03 for the rest. Filings: SEC EDGAR. Prices are delayed daily-close data.
Last updated 2026-10-08.
Informational only — NOT financial advice. All figures are delayed daily-close data from SEC EDGAR & market data, shown with their as-of date.