EOS ENERGY ENTERPRISES INC CLASS A (EOSE)
Industrials · Energy storage systems / battery technology · NASDAQ
Eos Energy provides safe, scalable, and sustainable zinc-based long-duration energy storage systems for grid-scale renewable energy infrastructure.
What EOS ENERGY ENTERPRISES INC CLASS A does
EOS Energy Enterprises manufactures and commercializes energy storage systems based on its proprietary iron flow battery technology. The company develops efficient manufacturing processes to scale production of its battery storage systems for grid-scale and other applications. EOS serves customers seeking long-duration energy storage solutions with the support of federal incentives including tax credits under the Inflation Reduction Act and potential DOE loan facility funding.
Themes: energy storage / grid storage, renewable energy integration, long-duration storage, IRA tax credits / government incentives, battery manufacturing scaling
Fundamentals
- Price$3.46 as of 2026-08-24 close
- Market cap$1.3B as of 2026-08-24
- 1-year return-45.3% 2025-08-22 close $6.32 → 2026-08-24 close $3.46
- P/En/a negative earnings
- Net margin-246.8% as of 2026-08-24
- Gross margin-84.8% as of 2026-08-24
- ROE-190.2% as of 2026-08-24
- Debt / equity3.37 as of 2026-08-24
- Revenue growth (YoY)+533.9% as of 2026-08-24
- Revenue CAGR (3y)+85.4% SEC XBRL
- Beta2.28 as of 2026-08-24
- Last reported earnings2026-08-05 SEC EDGAR Form 8-K (Item 2.02)
How EOSE compares in its sector
- net profit marginbottom 10% 457 covered Industrials peers, as of 2026-08-24
- operating marginbottom 10% 457 covered Industrials peers, as of 2026-08-24
- gross marginbottom 10% 455 covered Industrials peers, as of 2026-08-24
- return on equitybottom 10% 460 covered Industrials peers, as of 2026-08-24
- 3-year revenue CAGRtop 10% 426 covered Industrials peers
- free cash flow (absolute dollars, latest fiscal year)bottom 10% 414 covered Industrials peers, as of FY2025
Position among covered Industrials companies that report each metric (minimum 5 peers). A relative position within our covered catalog — not a valuation, quality, or investment judgment. A higher percentile is simply a higher value (for P/E, more expensive on earnings — never "better"). Informational only.
How EOS ENERGY ENTERPRISES INC CLASS A looks technically
EOS ENERGY ENTERPRISES INC CLASS A (EOSE) is trading 61.8% below its 200-day average, the long-term trend line — a long-term downtrend. Its 50-day average crossed below its 200-day average about 100 trading days ago — a "death cross", a bearish long-term signal. There is no clear trend right now — the price is choppy (ADX, a 0–100 trend-strength gauge, is 18, below the 25 that marks a real trend). Momentum is neutral — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 40, neither overbought (above 70) nor oversold (below 30). It made a new 20-day low about 19 trading days ago. It is 82.6% below its highest point of the past year. Day-to-day price swings are unusually narrow versus its own recent history — a "Bollinger squeeze" (in the tightest 6% of the past ~6 months), which often precedes a bigger move.
Trend
8
| Distance from the 200-day | it is trading 61.8% below its 200-day average, the long-term trend line — a long-term downtrend | -61.8% |
|---|---|---|
| 50-day moving average | its average price over the last 50 trading days — a short-term trend line — is $4.66 | $4.66 |
| 200-day moving average | its average price over the last 200 trading days — the long-term trend line — is $9.07 | $9.07 |
| Swing structure | each recent peak has been lower than the one before it and each dip deeper — the pattern chart-watchers call a downtrend, which describes where price has already been and not where it goes next | lower highs and lower lows |
| Last swing turn | its last significant turn was a swing high 12 calendar days ago — the swings before that are what the structure reading is measured on | 12 sessions |
| Wave structure | its recent swings can be read as a five-part downward sequence — what Elliott-wave chartists call an impulse — now in leg 5 of five; the labelling fails if price closes above 4.45. It is the only labelling that fits, and it describes the swings already printed, not what comes next. | possible downward five-wave sequence, in wave 5 |
| Since the 50/200 cross | its 50-day average crossed below its 200-day average about 100 trading days ago — a "death cross", a bearish long-term signal | 100 sessions |
| Trend strength (14-day ADX) | there is no clear trend right now — the price is choppy (ADX, a 0–100 trend-strength gauge, is 18, below the 25 that marks a real trend) | 18.4 |
Momentum
3
| 14-day RSI | momentum is neutral — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 40, neither overbought (above 70) nor oversold (below 30) | 40.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Position in its 14-day range | it is trading near the bottom of its 14-day range ($3.28 to $4.45) — its "stochastic" reading is 15 out of 100, where 0 would mean closing exactly at the 14-session low and 100 exactly at the high. This measures WHERE the price sits inside its recent range, which is a different question from the RSI beside it: RSI is a momentum gauge, measuring how FAST the price has been moving, so a stock can drift quietly to the bottom of its range with an ordinary RSI, or fall sharply and still sit in the middle. It has been slipping within that range over the last few sessions. | 15.4 |
| Since the MACD crossed zero | MACD, a trend-momentum gauge, is in positive territory (momentum leaning bullish) | 18 sessions |
Range
12
| 52-week high | its highest closing price over the past year (about 252 trading days) was $19.86 | $19.86 |
|---|---|---|
| From the 52-week high | it is 82.6% below its 52-week high (its highest price of the past year) | -82.6% |
| Above the 52-week low | it is 11.3% above its 52-week low (its lowest price of the past year) | +11.3% |
| Below the 52-week high | it is 82.6% below its highest point of the past year | 82.6% |
| Since a 20-day breakout | it made a new 20-day low about 19 trading days ago | 19 sessions |
| Since a 55-day breakout | it made a new 55-day low about 19 trading days ago | 19 sessions |
| All-time high | its highest closing price on record is $25.16 (set on 2021-02-22) | $25.16 |
| Given back of the 52-week move | over the past year its closes ranged ($3.14 to $19.19), and it has recovered essentially none of its fall from last year’s high — 2% of it. Chart-watchers call 61.8%-65% given back the "golden pocket" — for this company that is $13.06 to $13.57. It is watched widely enough that orders cluster there, which is the honest reason it matters; it is not a forecast. | 2.0% |
| From the all-time high | it is 86.2% below its all-time high | -86.3% |
| Nearest price level | it is trading 6.1% below a resistance level at $3.67 — a price it turned at three times since 2024-10-16, most recently on 2025-06-04. Since 2024-08-26 it has 2 such levels below the current price and 7 above. Levels like these describe where the price has reversed or paused before; they are not a forecast of where it will go. | +6.1% |
| All-time low | its lowest closing price on record is $0.61 (set on 2024-05-08) | $0.61 |
| Above the all-time low | it is 467.2% above its all-time low | +467.2% |
Volatility
5
| Band width vs its own 6 months | day-to-day price swings are unusually narrow versus its own recent history — a "Bollinger squeeze" (in the tightest 6% of the past ~6 months), which often precedes a bigger move | 6th percentile |
|---|---|---|
| Typical daily range | in a typical session it travels about $0.3974 between its high and its low — about 11.5% of its price. That is its "average true range" over the last 14 sessions, which also counts the distance from the previous close, so a day that opens well away from yesterday counts as the large move it was | $0.3974 |
| Bollinger bands (20-day, ±2σ) | most of its recent trading has stayed between about $3.16 and $4.47 — the "Bollinger bands", a range drawn two standard deviations either side of its 20-day average price, which widens when the stock gets more volatile and narrows when it settles | $3.16 – $3.81 – $4.47 |
| Typical daily range (% of price) | its price moves about 11.5% in a typical session — among the most volatile in the catalog. This is the average gap between a session's high and low over the last 14 sessions, counting overnight moves, expressed against the current price so it can be compared with companies trading at any price | 11.5% |
| Stretch from the 200-day average | it is trading 14.1 daily ranges below its 200-day average price (61.8% below it in plain percentage terms) — a way of asking how far it has stretched from its own average in units of how far it normally moves in a day, so a calm company and a jumpy one can be compared on the same scale | 14.1 daily ranges below its 200-day average |
Volume
1
| Volume vs its 30-day average | trading volume is about normal versus its 30-day average | 1.01× |
|---|
Analyst
2
| Change in the average price target | analysts have cut their average price target by 4.8% since the prior reading | -4.8% |
|---|---|---|
| Change in the consensus rating | the analyst consensus rating is unchanged since the prior reading | unchanged |
Candlestick patterns
1
| Since a hammer | 3 sessions ago, after a stretch of decline, it sold off hard during the session and then closed back near its high — a "hammer", the long lower wick showing the drop was bought back before the close | 3 sessions ago |
|---|
Price gaps
3
| Gap at the open | it opened on 2026-08-24 3.4% below the previous session's close — an overnight gap, the part of the move that happened while the market was shut, and had not traded back through that level by the close | -3.4% |
|---|---|---|
| Open gap | it gapped 3.4% below the previous close today and has not traded back through the level it left behind at 3.81 — an "unfilled gap", which describes a price range no trade has since crossed and is not a forecast that it will be crossed | -3.4% |
| Gap filled | a 2.3% gap up opened on 2026-08-21 has been "filled" today — price traded back through the level the gap left behind, and it took 1 session to close | today |
Price streaks
1
| Closing streak | it closed lower in its latest session, after a session that did not close lower — a single down day rather than a run | 1 session down |
|---|
Relative strength
4
| vs market, 1 month | over the past 1 month this stock lagged the market by 3.6 percentage points (the stock lost 0.3% while the market gained 3.3%) | -3.6% |
|---|---|---|
| vs market, 3 months | over the past 3 months this stock lagged the market by 59.5 percentage points (the stock lost 57.1% while the market gained 2.4%) | -59.5% |
| vs market, 6 months | over the past 6 months this stock lagged the market by 80.9 percentage points (the stock lost 69.9% while the market gained 11.1%) | -80.9% |
| vs market, 12 months | over the past 12 months this stock lagged the market by 63.6 percentage points (the stock lost 45.3% while the market gained 18.3%) | -63.6% |
Signal agreement
2
| Bullish technical signals | 2 of the 9 technical signals we can compute for it are currently in a bullish state: MACD momentum is positive, near the bottom of its 14-day range (oversold) — these describe past price behaviour, not a forecast | 2 of 9 |
|---|---|---|
| Bearish technical signals | 4 of the 9 technical signals we can compute for it are currently in a bearish state: a "death cross" — its 50-day average is below its 200-day, trading below its 200-day average, lagging the market over 6 months, trading below the Ichimoku cloud — these describe past price behaviour, not a forecast | 4 of 9 |
Trend (Ichimoku cloud)
1
| Vs the Ichimoku cloud | trading 34% below the Ichimoku cloud — a band drawn from where its own highs and lows sat up to 2026-07-17 and projected forward over today's price, the side traders read as an established downtrend, with the band above acting as the level that would have to be cleared. The band itself is thick, spanning 46.2% of the share price, which is taken to mean a barrier that has held for a while and takes effort to cross. | -34.0% |
|---|
Volume-weighted price
2
| Vs this year’s average price paid | the price is 54% below the average price paid so far this year, so the typical buyer over that stretch is under water. That average is $7.51 — a volume-weighted average of daily closes over 158 sessions, not a true tick-by-tick VWAP. | -53.9% |
|---|---|---|
| Vs the average paid since it last reported | the price is 10% below the average price paid since it last reported on 2026-07-15 (its 8-K), so the typical buyer over that stretch is under water. That average is $3.83 — a volume-weighted average of daily closes over 29 sessions, not a true tick-by-tick VWAP. | -9.7% |
Price levels it has turned at before
EOSE last closed at $3.46 on 2026-08-24. Since 2024-08-26 it has turned at 2 prices below its last close and 7 above; the 2 nearest below and the 3 nearest above are listed, nearest first.
| Level | Side | Distance | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| $3.67 | Resistance | 6.1% above the last close | turned there three times · 2024-10-16 to 2025-06-04 |
| $3.09 | Support | 10.7% below the last close | turned there twice · 2025-04-09 to 2026-07-29 |
| $2.79 | Support | 19.4% below the last close | turned there twice · 2024-09-16 to 2024-10-10 |
| $4.43 | Resistance | 28.1% above the last close | turned there five times · 2025-01-14 to 2026-08-12 |
| $4.86 | Resistance | 40.5% above the last close | turned there twice · 2025-05-06 to 2025-06-20 |
A level is a price this company reversed or paused at more than once — they describe past behaviour, not a forecast of where the price will go.
Wave structure
Its recent swings can be read as a five-part downward sequence — what Elliott-wave chartists call an impulse — now in leg 5 of five.
This labelling fails — stops being a possible reading at all — if it closes above $4.45.
It is the only labelling that fits these swings, though its proportions are not the textbook ones. It was chosen from 3 labellings that survived the rules, counting shorter readings of the same bars.
This labelling was already in place when we began recording count changes on 2026-08-13, so how long it has stood is not something we can say yet.
Read from daily closes as of 2026-08-24.
An Elliott-wave count describes the swings already printed and the level that would disprove it. It is not a forecast, a target, or advice.
Screens: Trading below the 200-day moving average · Pulled back from the 12-month high · in a Bollinger Band volatility squeeze · trendless / choppy (low ADX) · Analyst price target recently CUT · lagging the market | Learn: moving average · golden cross · adx · rsi · breakout · fifty two week high low · bollinger bands
Based on daily closing prices as of 2026-08-24. Describes past price behavior only — informational, not financial advice.
Analyst consensus
- Consensus ratingBuy (2.36 mean, 1=Strong Buy…5=Strong Sell) — 9 analysts
- Mean price target$6.67 range $4.00 – $11.00; median $5.00
Analyst estimates, as of 2026-08-19. These are third-party analyst opinions and price targets, aggregated — not a recommendation, prediction, or advice from stocks-llm. Informational only.
Analyst EPS estimate for EOSE
- Consensus EPS estimate-$0.4464 next reporting period, as of 2026-08-19
Change over time is not available yet: it needs two readings of the same reporting period at least 30 days apart, and we have been recording these estimates since 2026-08-04. An estimate for a DIFFERENT quarter is not a revision, so a reading from before the last report is never compared with one after it.
The consensus estimate for the next reporting period, and how it has moved between readings of that SAME period. A change is measured only between readings estimating one period — when a company reports, the consensus moves to the next quarter and the two numbers are not comparable. Informational only, not a forecast and not advice.
Key risks (from latest filing)
["Company has history of losses and negative net margins; must achieve significant business growth and manufacturing process improvements to reach sustained profitability and commercial success","Products have lower power density compared to lithium-ion competitors; company has limited manufacturing experience and may struggle with scaling production capacity and achieving targeted cost efficiencies","Significant dependence on government subsidies (IRA tax credits, DOE loan facility funding) and federal energy policy; reduction, elimination, or expiration of government incentives could materially reduce customer demand; company also faces credit facility covenants and risks of default under DOE Loan Facility and Credit Agreement"]
What changed in the latest 10-Q
AI-assisted comparison of EOSE's 10-Q filed 2026-05-13 against the prior one filed 2025-11-05.
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
The two filings could not be meaningfully compared for this section.
Risk Factors
- Added:
- Added bullet point in forward-looking statements: 'including potential impacts from any repeal or modification of the legislation' regarding Inflation Reduction Act tax credits (filed 2026-05-13)
- Added reference to 'Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025' in forward-looking statements section (filed 2026-05-13)
- Removed:
- Removed 'Interest expense - related parties' line item from quarterly statements, which showed $(5,781) thousand for three months ended March 31, 2025 (filed 2025-11-05)
- Removed 'Loan commitment assets - related party' from current assets, which was $21,731 thousand as of December 31, 2024 (filed 2025-11-05)
- Reworded:
- Changed forward-looking statement regarding Inflation Reduction Act from 'the amount of final tax credits available to our customers or to Eos pursuant to the Inflation Reduction Act' to include 'including potential impacts from any repeal or modification of the legislation' (filed 2026-05-13)
- Changed reference from 'Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024' to 'Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025' (filed 2026-05-13)
- Changed consolidated statements header from 'STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE LOSS' to 'STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME' (filed 2026-05-13)
- Notes:
- The two filings cover different fiscal periods (three months ended March 31, 2026 vs. three months and nine months ended September 30, 2025), making some financial statement comparisons not directly comparable
- Balance sheet dates differ significantly (March 31, 2026 vs. September 30, 2025 and December 31, 2024), so asset and liability changes reflect different reporting periods rather than discrete period-to-period changes
AI-assisted comparison of two SEC filing sections. It describes wording and theme changes only, makes no materiality, legal, or investment judgement, and is not financial advice. Informational only — not financial advice.
Insider activity (SEC Form 4)
0 open-market purchases and 9 open-market sales by insiders in the last 90 days.
- Last 30 days0 buys · 3 sells ($1M) — 3 selling insiders
- Last 90 days0 buys · 9 sells ($2M) — 6 selling insiders
- Last 180 days0 buys · 11 sells ($2M) — 6 selling insiders
Activity heuristic: net selling (a transparent product heuristic from the counts above, not a prediction or advice)
Most recent open-market transaction: 2026-07-28. As of 2026-08-25.
View full insider trading history → View SEC Form 3/4/5 filingsAsk about EOSE's insider activity →
Only open-market purchases (SEC code P) and sales (code S) are counted here. Option exercises, vesting/awards, gifts, and shares withheld for taxes are excluded — they are compensation or mechanical, not open-market conviction. Sales may be planned and non-discretionary (e.g. a Rule 10b5-1 plan) and are not necessarily bearish; open-market buying is not a recommendation to buy. Informational only — not financial advice.
Institutional ownership (13F)
5 institutional 13F filers reported holding EOSE as of 2026-03-31 (quarter-end position, filed within 45 days).
- Distinct 13F filers 5
- Reported shares held 52,471,593
- Reported value $260,259,103
reported quarterly holdings change (2025-12-31 → 2026-03-31): 1 new, 3 increased, 1 decreased, 0 exited. Change counts cover only managers that filed 13F reports in BOTH quarters, derived between two quarter-end snapshots — not same-day trades; a single manager is never said to have "bought" or "sold".
Institutional holdings are quarter-end long positions reported on SEC Form 13F-HR, filed up to 45 days after the quarter ends — they are delayed, are not real-time trades, exclude short positions and most non-US securities, and are not investment advice. Any increase/decrease is a reported change between two quarterly snapshots, not a same-day purchase or sale. These are quarter-end snapshots from the 13F filings on SEC EDGAR, filed within 45 days — not real-time, and any change is a difference between two quarterly reports, not a same-day trade. Informational only — not financial advice.
Short interest (FINRA)
EOSE had 115,719,997 shares of reported short interest as of the 2026-07-31 FINRA settlement date (delayed, bi-monthly; not real-time).
EOSE had 31.8% of its shares outstanding sold short as of the 2026-07-31 FINRA settlement date (percent of FLOAT would be higher — float is not disclosed in the source). FINRA reported 4.36 days to cover at the same settlement.
- Reported short interest (shares) 115,719,997
- Short interest (% of shares outstanding) 31.8%
- Prior settlement (shares) 105,912,700
- Reported change 9.26%
- Days to cover (reported) 4.36
Reported to FINRA as of the 2026-07-31 settlement date. Short interest is reported to FINRA and published on a delayed, bi-monthly schedule (as of a settlement date, disseminated roughly eight business days later) — it is NOT real-time, does not cover every venue or all US trading, and is not a short-squeeze prediction or investment advice. Days-to-cover is the value FINRA reports; percent of float is not shown because the source file carries no share-count denominator — where a percent appears it is of shares OUTSTANDING, the larger base, and is therefore a floor on percent of float. Informational only — not financial advice.
Competitors & peers
- Tesla (TSLA)
- Fluence Energy (FLNC)
- Stem (STEM)
- Powin Energy
- Form Energy
AI-enriched competitor set. Linked names are companies covered by stocks-llm; other named peers are shown for reference only.
Compare EOSE vs…
EOSE ranks in…
Frequently asked questions
What does EOS ENERGY ENTERPRISES INC CLASS A (EOSE) do?
EOS Energy Enterprises manufactures and commercializes energy storage systems based on its proprietary iron flow battery technology. The company develops efficient manufacturing processes to scale production of its battery storage systems for grid-scale and other applications. EOS serves customers seeking long-duration energy storage solutions with the support of federal incentives including tax credits under the Inflation Reduction Act and potential DOE loan facility funding.
What sector is EOS ENERGY ENTERPRISES INC CLASS A (EOSE) in?
EOS ENERGY ENTERPRISES INC CLASS A (EOSE) is classified in the Industrials sector. Its industry is Energy storage systems / battery technology. It trades on NASDAQ.
Who are EOS ENERGY ENTERPRISES INC CLASS A's (EOSE) competitors?
Notable peers of EOS ENERGY ENTERPRISES INC CLASS A (EOSE) include Tesla, Fluence Energy, Stem, Powin Energy and Form Energy. This peer set is informational only — not financial advice.
Is EOS ENERGY ENTERPRISES INC CLASS A (EOSE) overbought or oversold right now?
EOS ENERGY ENTERPRISES INC CLASS A (EOSE) is currently neither overbought nor oversold — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 40, in the neutral middle (as of 2026-08-24). RSI describes recent price momentum, not a forecast — informational only, not financial advice.
Where does stocks-llm's data on EOSE come from?
Fundamentals and prices come from market data, as of 2026-08-24; company filings and profile facts come from SEC EDGAR. All figures are delayed daily-close data shown with their as-of date — informational only, not financial advice.
Fundamentals: market data, as of 2026-08-24. Filings: SEC EDGAR. Prices are delayed daily-close data.
Last updated 2026-08-24.
Informational only — NOT financial advice. All figures are delayed daily-close data from SEC EDGAR & market data, shown with their as-of date.