ZoomInfo (GTM)
Communication Services · Go-to-market intelligence and sales enablement software · NASDAQ
ZoomInfo is the modern go-to-market intelligence platform combining billions of data points, AI-powered insights, and automation to help sales, marketing, operations, and recruiting teams identify, engage, and close deals faster.
What ZoomInfo does
ZoomInfo is a cloud-based go-to-market intelligence platform that provides sales, marketing, operations, and recruiting teams with AI-powered data and insights. The company aggregates billions of data points from millions of sources and delivers curated business intelligence about companies and contacts, enriched through its proprietary AI/ML engine and human-in-the-loop research. Users access this data directly through ZoomInfo's platform or integrate it into their CRM and automation systems to improve sales cycles, win rates, and hiring outcomes.
Themes: Go-to-market intelligence / sales enablement, AI-powered business data and insights, Sales and marketing automation, CRM data integration and enrichment, Recruiting and talent acquisition intelligence, Account-based marketing
Fundamentals
- Price$3.90 as of 2026-08-24 close
- Market cap$1.1B as of 2026-08-24
- 1-year return-63.7% 2025-08-22 close $10.75 → 2026-08-24 close $3.90
- P/En/a negative earnings
- Net margin-43.0% as of 2026-08-24
- Gross margin+83.8% as of 2026-08-24
- ROE+8.0% as of 2026-08-24
- Debt / equity0.88 as of 2026-08-24
- Revenue growth (YoY)+2.7% as of 2026-08-24
- Revenue CAGR (3y)+4.4% SEC XBRL
- Beta1.55 as of 2026-08-24
- Last reported earnings2026-08-05 SEC EDGAR Form 8-K (Item 2.02)
How GTM compares in its sector
- net profit marginbottom 10% 132 covered Communication Services peers, as of 2026-08-24
- operating marginbottom 10% 132 covered Communication Services peers, as of 2026-08-24
- gross margintop 10% 132 covered Communication Services peers, as of 2026-08-24
- return on equitymiddle range 132 covered Communication Services peers, as of 2026-08-24
- 3-year revenue CAGRmiddle range 121 covered Communication Services peers
- free cash flow (absolute dollars, latest fiscal year)middle range 114 covered Communication Services peers, as of FY2025
Position among covered Communication Services companies that report each metric (minimum 5 peers). A relative position within our covered catalog — not a valuation, quality, or investment judgment. A higher percentile is simply a higher value (for P/E, more expensive on earnings — never "better"). Informational only.
How ZoomInfo looks technically
ZoomInfo (GTM) is trading 40.5% below its 200-day average, the long-term trend line — a long-term downtrend. Its 50-day average crossed below its 200-day average about 141 trading days ago — a "death cross", a bearish long-term signal. A strong uptrend is in place — ADX, a 0–100 trend-strength gauge, is 26, with buyers in control. Momentum is neutral — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 58, neither overbought (above 70) nor oversold (below 30). MACD, a trend-momentum gauge, turned bearish about 3 trading days ago (its momentum flipped negative). It made a new 20-day high about 7 trading days ago. It is 68.3% below its highest point of the past year.
Trend
8
| Distance from the 200-day | it is trading 40.5% below its 200-day average, the long-term trend line — a long-term downtrend | -40.5% |
|---|---|---|
| 50-day moving average | its average price over the last 50 trading days — a short-term trend line — is $3.25 | $3.25 |
| 200-day moving average | its average price over the last 200 trading days — the long-term trend line — is $6.68 | $6.68 |
| Swing structure | each recent peak has been higher than the one before it and each dip has been shallower — the pattern chart-watchers call an uptrend, which describes where price has already been and not where it goes next | higher highs and higher lows |
| Last swing turn | its last significant turn was a swing high 8 calendar days ago — the swings before that are what the structure reading is measured on | 8 sessions |
| Wave structure | its recent swings can be read as a five-part upward sequence — what Elliott-wave chartists call an impulse — now in the fourth leg, a pullback against that upward direction; the labelling fails if price closes below 3.23. It is one of several labellings that fit, and it describes the swings already printed, not what comes next. The same swings also read as a completed three-part correction. | possible upward five-wave sequence, in wave 4 (one of several readings) |
| Since the 50/200 cross | its 50-day average crossed below its 200-day average about 141 trading days ago — a "death cross", a bearish long-term signal | 141 sessions |
| Trend strength (14-day ADX) | a strong uptrend is in place — ADX, a 0–100 trend-strength gauge, is 26, with buyers in control | 25.6 |
Momentum
3
| 14-day RSI | momentum is neutral — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 58, neither overbought (above 70) nor oversold (below 30) | 57.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Position in its 14-day range | it is trading in the upper half of its 14-day range ($3.46 to $4.37) — its "stochastic" reading is 56 out of 100, where 0 would mean closing exactly at the 14-session low and 100 exactly at the high. This measures WHERE the price sits inside its recent range, which is a different question from the RSI beside it: RSI is a momentum gauge, measuring how FAST the price has been moving, so a stock can drift quietly to the bottom of its range with an ordinary RSI, or fall sharply and still sit in the middle. It has been climbing within that range over the last few sessions. | 56.4 |
| Since the MACD crossed zero | MACD, a trend-momentum gauge, turned bearish about 3 trading days ago (its momentum flipped negative) | 3 sessions |
Range
12
| 52-week high | its highest closing price over the past year (about 252 trading days) was $12.51 | $12.51 |
|---|---|---|
| From the 52-week high | it is 68.3% below its 52-week high (its highest price of the past year) | -68.3% |
| Above the 52-week low | it is 56.3% above its 52-week low (its lowest price of the past year) | +56.3% |
| Below the 52-week high | it is 68.3% below its highest point of the past year | 68.3% |
| Since a 20-day breakout | it made a new 20-day high about 7 trading days ago | 7 sessions |
| Since a 55-day breakout | it made a new 55-day low about 41 trading days ago | 41 sessions |
| All-time high | its highest closing price on record is $79.17 (set on 2021-11-19) | $79.17 |
| Given back of the 52-week move | over the past year its closes ranged ($2.61 to $12.20), and it has recovered only a small part of its fall from last year’s high — 14% of it. Chart-watchers call 61.8%-65% given back the "golden pocket" — for this company that is $8.54 to $8.84. It is watched widely enough that orders cluster there, which is the honest reason it matters; it is not a forecast. | 14.2% |
| From the all-time high | it is 95.0% below its all-time high | -95.0% |
| Nearest price level | it is trading 44.7% below a resistance level at $5.75 — a price it turned at twice since 2026-02-24, most recently on 2026-04-23. Since 2024-08-21 it has 0 such levels below the current price and 12 above. Levels like these describe where the price has reversed or paused before; they are not a forecast of where it will go. | +44.7% |
| All-time low | its lowest closing price on record is $2.54 (set on 2026-06-22) | $2.54 |
| Above the all-time low | it is 56.3% above its all-time low | +56.3% |
Volatility
5
| Band width vs its own 6 months | day-to-day price swings are about average versus its own recent 6-month history | 60th percentile |
|---|---|---|
| Typical daily range | in a typical session it travels about $0.2536 between its high and its low — about 6.4% of its price. That is its "average true range" over the last 14 sessions, which also counts the distance from the previous close, so a day that opens well away from yesterday counts as the large move it was | $0.2536 |
| Bollinger bands (20-day, ±2σ) | most of its recent trading has stayed between about $3.09 and $4.45 — the "Bollinger bands", a range drawn two standard deviations either side of its 20-day average price, which widens when the stock gets more volatile and narrows when it settles | $3.09 – $3.77 – $4.45 |
| Typical daily range (% of price) | its price moves about 6.4% in a typical session — more volatile than most companies we cover. This is the average gap between a session's high and low over the last 14 sessions, counting overnight moves, expressed against the current price so it can be compared with companies trading at any price | 6.4% |
| Stretch from the 200-day average | it is trading 10.7 daily ranges below its 200-day average price (40.5% below it in plain percentage terms) — a way of asking how far it has stretched from its own average in units of how far it normally moves in a day, so a calm company and a jumpy one can be compared on the same scale | 10.7 daily ranges below its 200-day average |
Volume
1
| Volume vs its 30-day average | trading volume is about normal versus its 30-day average | 0.83× |
|---|
Analyst
2
| Change in the average price target | analysts have cut their average price target by 2.0% since the prior reading | -2.0% |
|---|---|---|
| Change in the consensus rating | the analyst consensus rating is unchanged since the prior reading | unchanged |
Candlestick patterns
2
| Since a doji | 2 sessions ago it opened and closed at almost the same price after trading through a wider range — a "doji", the classic picture of buyers and sellers finishing the session level | 2 sessions ago |
|---|---|---|
| Since a bullish engulfing | 6 sessions ago it opened below the previous session's close and finished above that session's open — a "bullish engulfing" pair, where one up day more than undid the down day before it | 6 sessions ago |
Price gaps
3
| Gap at the open | it opened on 2026-08-21 0.3% below the previous session's close — an overnight gap, the part of the move that happened while the market was shut, and traded back through that level before the close | -0.3% |
|---|---|---|
| Open gap | it gapped 2.7% above the previous close 11 sessions ago and has not traded back through the level it left behind at 3.66 — an "unfilled gap", which describes a price range no trade has since crossed and is not a forecast that it will be crossed | +2.7% |
| Gap filled | a 4.6% gap up opened on 2026-08-07 has been "filled" 10 sessions ago — price traded back through the level the gap left behind, and it closed again during the very session that opened it | 10 sessions ago |
Price streaks
1
| Closing streak | it has closed higher 2 sessions in a row, a +3.93% move over the run — an unbroken run of up days, which describes what has already happened and says nothing about the next session | 2 sessions up |
|---|
Relative strength
4
| vs market, 1 month | over the past 1 month this stock beat the market by 29.1 percentage points (the stock gained 31.5% while the market gained 2.3%) | +29.1% |
|---|---|---|
| vs market, 3 months | over the past 3 months this stock beat the market by 8.1 percentage points (the stock gained 11.2% while the market gained 3.1%) | +8.1% |
| vs market, 6 months | over the past 6 months this stock lagged the market by 49.5 percentage points (the stock lost 38.4% while the market gained 11.1%) | -49.5% |
| vs market, 12 months | over the past 12 months this stock lagged the market by 81.2 percentage points (the stock lost 60.7% while the market gained 20.5%) | -81.2% |
Signal agreement
2
| Bullish technical signals | 1 of the 9 technical signals we can compute for it is currently in a bullish state: a strong uptrend, with buyers in control — these describe past price behaviour, not a forecast | 1 of 9 |
|---|---|---|
| Bearish technical signals | 4 of the 9 technical signals we can compute for it are currently in a bearish state: a "death cross" — its 50-day average is below its 200-day, trading below its 200-day average, MACD momentum is negative, lagging the market over 6 months — these describe past price behaviour, not a forecast | 4 of 9 |
Trend (Ichimoku cloud)
1
| Vs the Ichimoku cloud | trading inside the Ichimoku cloud — a band drawn from where its own highs and lows sat up to 2026-07-16 and projected forward over today's price, the zone traders read as unresolved — neither side has established a trend, and the band is where that gets settled. The band itself is thick, spanning 44.3% of the share price, which is taken to mean a barrier that has held for a while and takes effort to cross. | 0.0% |
|---|
Volume-weighted price
2
| Vs this year’s average price paid | the price is 23% below the average price paid so far this year, so the typical buyer over that stretch is under water. That average is $5.18 — a volume-weighted average of daily closes over 150 sessions, not a true tick-by-tick VWAP. | -23.3% |
|---|---|---|
| Vs the average paid since it last reported | the price is 1% below the average price paid since it last reported on 2026-08-05 (its 10-Q), so the typical buyer over that stretch is under water. That average is $4.01 — a volume-weighted average of daily closes over 13 sessions, not a true tick-by-tick VWAP. | -1.0% |
Price levels it has turned at before
GTM last closed at $3.97 on 2026-08-21. Since 2024-08-21 it has turned at 0 prices below its last close and 12 above; the 3 nearest above are listed, nearest first.
| Level | Side | Distance | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| $5.75 | Resistance | 44.7% above the last close | turned there twice · 2026-02-24 to 2026-04-23 |
| $8.98 | Resistance | 126.3% above the last close | turned there twice · 2025-08-05 to 2025-11-21 |
| $9.38 | Resistance | 136.2% above the last close | turned there four times · 2024-08-28 to 2025-02-25 |
A level is a price this company reversed or paused at more than once — they describe past behaviour, not a forecast of where the price will go.
Wave structure
Its recent swings can be read as a five-part upward sequence — what Elliott-wave chartists call an impulse — now in leg 4 of five, a pullback against that direction.
This labelling fails — stops being a possible reading at all — if it closes below $3.23.
This is one of several labellings that fit the same swings, so treat it as a reading rather than the reading. It was chosen from 2 labellings that survived the rules, counting shorter readings of the same bars.
On past moves of this shape the leg has usually ended somewhere between $3.55 and $3.98 — that is where it has tended to end if the count holds, not a forecast of where the price goes.
Alternate reading: The same swings also read as a completed three-part correction, which fails on a close above $4.37.
This reading has stood for 2 trading days, since 2026-08-20.
Read from daily closes as of 2026-08-21.
An Elliott-wave count describes the swings already printed and the level that would disprove it. It is not a forecast, a target, or advice.
Screens: Trading below the 200-day moving average · Pulled back from the 12-month high · MACD just crossed bearish (12/26/9) · in a strong, established uptrend (ADX) · Analyst price target recently CUT · lagging the market | Learn: moving average · golden cross · adx · rsi · macd · breakout · fifty two week high low
Based on daily closing prices as of 2026-08-21. Describes past price behavior only — informational, not financial advice.
Analyst consensus
- Consensus ratingHold (3.33 mean, 1=Strong Buy…5=Strong Sell) — 18 analysts
- Mean price target$4.60 range $2.50 – $15.00; median $4.00
Analyst estimates, as of 2026-08-21. These are third-party analyst opinions and price targets, aggregated — not a recommendation, prediction, or advice from stocks-llm. Informational only.
Analyst EPS estimate for GTM
- Consensus EPS estimate$0.2876 next reporting period, as of 2026-08-21
Change over time is not available yet: it needs two readings of the same reporting period at least 30 days apart, and we have been recording these estimates since 2026-08-04. An estimate for a DIFFERENT quarter is not a revision, so a reading from before the last report is never compared with one after it.
The consensus estimate for the next reporting period, and how it has moved between readings of that SAME period. A change is measured only between readings estimating one period — when a company reports, the consensus moves to the next quarter and the two numbers are not comparable. Informational only, not a forecast and not advice.
Key risks (from latest filing)
["Customer spending on sales, marketing, and recruiting technology could decline due to weaker economic conditions, harming revenue growth and profitability","Data accuracy and reliability are critical to competitive positioning; failure to maintain high-quality, comprehensive data could reduce demand and harm business results","Intensifying competition from larger, better-funded technology companies, including LLM and generative AI providers, could erode market share and pricing power"]
What changed in the latest 10-Q
AI-assisted comparison of GTM's 10-Q filed 2026-05-11 against the prior one filed 2025-11-03.
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
- Added:
- Added reference to '2025 Form 10-K' (newer filing uses 2025 10-K vs. older filing's 2024 10-K)
- Added phrase 'agent-assisted selling' to overview description of platform capabilities
- Added 'Share Repurchase Program' section detailing February 2026 Board authorization of $1.0 billion and aggregate total of $2.6 billion
- Added 'Restructuring Program' section referencing May 5, 2026 Board approval of 2026 Restructuring Program
- Added reference to Note 1 and Note 16 in notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements
- Removed:
- Removed paragraph describing AI and machine learning powered data engine, research analysts, and data scientists enriching platform
- Removed 'Factors Affecting the Comparability of Our Results of Operations' section header and introductory text
- Removed 'Risk Related to Geopolitical and Macroeconomic Factors' reference (replaced with 'Risks Related')
- Removed reference to '2024 Form 10-K' (replaced with 2025 Form 10-K)
- Reworded:
- Changed 'Risk Related to' to 'Risks Related to' in macroeconomic conditions reference
- Changed date references from 'September 30, 2025 and 2024' to 'March 31, 2026 and 2025'
- Changed net revenue retention rate from '90% and 85%' to '90% and 87%'
- Changed customer threshold language from 'more than $100,000' to '$100,000 or greater'
- Changed customer count from '1,887 and 1,809' to '1,900 and 1,868'
- Added new sentence: 'Customers with $100,000 or greater in ACV comprised over 50% of total Company ACV as of March 31, 2026'
- Notes:
- The older filing text appears truncated at 'Factors Affecting the Comparability of Our Results of Operations' section, limiting full comparison of that section
- Numerical changes reflect different reporting periods (Q3 2025 vs. Q1 2026) and may reflect normal business progression rather than discrete policy changes
Risk Factors
- Added:
- Risk factor added (newer filing 2026-05-11): 'We may in the future face competition from prominent large-language-model (LLM) providers and generative AI companies'
- Risk factor added (newer filing 2026-05-11): 'as we may not be able to effectively monetize our AI investments' regarding business evolution
- Risk factor added (newer filing 2026-05-11): reference to 'artificial intelligence optimization (AIO)' in search engine algorithm risk
- Risk factor added (newer filing 2026-05-11): 'As we acquire and invest in companies or technologies' risk factor regarding integration and value dilution
- Risk factor added (newer filing 2026-05-11): 'Sustainability and related reporting obligations expose us to risks that could adversely affect our reputation and performance'
- Risk factor added (newer filing 2026-05-11): 'Our customers or unauthorized parties could use our products and services in a manner that is contrary to our values or applicable law'
- Removed:
- Risk factor removed (older filing 2025-11-03): 'We may be unable to successfully integrate acquired businesses, services, databases, and technologies into our operations'
- Risk factor removed (older filing 2025-11-03): 'Third-parties could use our products and services in a manner that is unlawful or contrary to our values or applicable law'
- Risk factor removed (older filing 2025-11-03): 'Downturns or upturns in new sales and renewals are not immediately reflected in full within our results of operations'
- Risk factor removed (older filing 2025-11-03): 'We anticipate increasing operating expenses in the future, and we may not be able to maintain profitability'
- Risk factor removed (older filing 2025-11-03): 'We have a substantial amount of debt, which could adversely affect our financial position'
- Risk factor removed (older filing 2025-11-03): 'We may not be able to generate sufficient cash to service all of our indebtedness'
- Risk factor removed (older filing 2025-11-03): 'Interest rate fluctuations may affect our results of operations and financial condition'
- Risk factor removed (older filing 2025-11-03): 'Changes in our credit and other ratings could adversely impact' (text cut off in older filing)
- Reworded:
- Wording changed (newer 2026-05-11 vs. older 2025-11-03): 'expand subscriptions of current customers' changed to 'expand subscriptions of current customers' (older: 'expand existing subscriptions')
- Wording changed (newer 2026-05-11 vs. older 2025-11-03): 'Other technology companies' changed from 'Other companies'
- Wording changed (newer 2026-05-11 vs. older 2025-11-03): Added reference to 'large-language-model (LLM) providers and generative AI companies' in competition risk
- Wording changed (newer 2026-05-11 vs. older 2025-11-03): 'would have a material adverse effect' changed from 'have an adverse effect'
- Wording changed (newer 2026-05-11 vs. older 2025-11-03): 'allow businesses to gather' changed from 'allow companies to gather'
- Wording changed (newer 2026-05-11 vs. older 2025-11-03): Expanded AI competition language: added 'we may in the future face competition from prominent LLM providers'
- Wording changed (newer 2026-05-11 vs. older 2025-11-03): 'which make it difficult to forecast demand for our services and achieve an optimal resource allocation strategy' (newer) vs. 'which make it difficult to forecast demand for our services' (older)
- Wording changed (newer 2026-05-11 vs. older 2025-11-03): Search engine risk expanded to include 'SEO, artificial intelligence optimization (AIO)'
- Wording changed (newer 2026-05-11 vs. older 2025-11-03): 'loss of one or more of these employees' (newer) vs. 'loss of or inability' (older)
- Wording changed (newer 2026-05-11 vs. older 2025-11-03): 'Investing in our AI capability' (newer) vs. 'Investing in our artificial intelligence ("AI") capability' (older)
- Wording changed (newer 2026-05-11 vs. older 2025-11-03): Form 10-K reference changed from 'fiscal year ended December 31, 2024 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") on February 25, 2025 (the "2024 Form 10-K")' to 'fiscal year ended December 31, 2025 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") on February 12, 2026 (the "2025 Form 10-K")'
- Wording changed (newer 2026-05-11 vs. older 2025-11-03): Table of Contents page numbers changed: Item 1A from page 64 to page 46; Item 2 from page 64 to page 46; Item 3 from page 64 to page 46; Item 4 from page 65 to page 47; Item 5 from page 65 to page 47; Item 6 from page 66 to page 48; Signatures from page 67 to page 49
- Notes:
- The newer filing appears to be truncated at the end ('Our failure to raise additional capital or generate cash flows necessary to expand ou'); comparison of remaining Financial, Accounting and Credit Matters risks is incomplete
- The older filing also appears truncated ('Changes in our credit and other ratings could adversely impact'); full text of this risk is not available for comparison
- These are excerpts from 10-Q filings (quarterly reports) covering different periods: newer filing for quarter ended March 31, 2026 vs. older filing for quarter ended September 30, 2025
AI-assisted comparison of two SEC filing sections. It describes wording and theme changes only, makes no materiality, legal, or investment judgement, and is not financial advice. Informational only — not financial advice.
Insider activity (SEC Form 4)
0 open-market purchases and 7 open-market sales by insiders in the last 90 days.
- Last 30 days0 buys · 3 sells ($91783) — 2 selling insiders
- Last 90 days0 buys · 7 sells ($161872) — 3 selling insiders
- Last 180 days1 buy ($98981) · 8 sells ($168832) — 1 buying, 3 selling insiders
Activity heuristic: net selling (a transparent product heuristic from the counts above, not a prediction or advice)
Most recent open-market transaction: 2026-08-07. As of 2026-08-25.
View full insider trading history → View SEC Form 3/4/5 filingsAsk about GTM's insider activity →
Only open-market purchases (SEC code P) and sales (code S) are counted here. Option exercises, vesting/awards, gifts, and shares withheld for taxes are excluded — they are compensation or mechanical, not open-market conviction. Sales may be planned and non-discretionary (e.g. a Rule 10b5-1 plan) and are not necessarily bearish; open-market buying is not a recommendation to buy. Informational only — not financial advice.
Institutional ownership (13F)
5 institutional 13F filers reported holding GTM as of 2026-03-31 (quarter-end position, filed within 45 days).
- Distinct 13F filers 5
- Reported shares held 61,354,889
- Reported value $366,902,241
reported quarterly holdings change (2025-12-31 → 2026-03-31): 0 new, 3 increased, 2 decreased, 0 exited. Change counts cover only managers that filed 13F reports in BOTH quarters, derived between two quarter-end snapshots — not same-day trades; a single manager is never said to have "bought" or "sold".
Institutional holdings are quarter-end long positions reported on SEC Form 13F-HR, filed up to 45 days after the quarter ends — they are delayed, are not real-time trades, exclude short positions and most non-US securities, and are not investment advice. Any increase/decrease is a reported change between two quarterly snapshots, not a same-day purchase or sale. These are quarter-end snapshots from the 13F filings on SEC EDGAR, filed within 45 days — not real-time, and any change is a difference between two quarterly reports, not a same-day trade. Informational only — not financial advice.
Short interest (FINRA)
GTM had 43,881,252 shares of reported short interest as of the 2026-07-31 FINRA settlement date (delayed, bi-monthly; not real-time).
GTM had 15.1% of its shares outstanding sold short as of the 2026-07-31 FINRA settlement date (percent of FLOAT would be higher — float is not disclosed in the source). FINRA reported 6.51 days to cover at the same settlement.
- Reported short interest (shares) 43,881,252
- Short interest (% of shares outstanding) 15.1%
- Prior settlement (shares) 41,501,898
- Reported change 5.73%
- Days to cover (reported) 6.51
Reported to FINRA as of the 2026-07-31 settlement date. Short interest is reported to FINRA and published on a delayed, bi-monthly schedule (as of a settlement date, disseminated roughly eight business days later) — it is NOT real-time, does not cover every venue or all US trading, and is not a short-squeeze prediction or investment advice. Days-to-cover is the value FINRA reports; percent of float is not shown because the source file carries no share-count denominator — where a percent appears it is of shares OUTSTANDING, the larger base, and is therefore a floor on percent of float. Informational only — not financial advice.
Competitors & peers
- Salesforce (CRM)
- HubSpot (HUBS)
- Apollo.io
- RocketReach
- Hunter.io
- LinkedIn Sales Navigator
- Clearbit
- Demandbase
AI-enriched competitor set. Linked names are companies covered by stocks-llm; other named peers are shown for reference only.
Compare GTM vs…
Frequently asked questions
What does ZoomInfo (GTM) do?
ZoomInfo is a cloud-based go-to-market intelligence platform that provides sales, marketing, operations, and recruiting teams with AI-powered data and insights. The company aggregates billions of data points from millions of sources and delivers curated business intelligence about companies and contacts, enriched through its proprietary AI/ML engine and human-in-the-loop research.
What sector is ZoomInfo (GTM) in?
ZoomInfo (GTM) is classified in the Communication Services sector. Its industry is Go-to-market intelligence and sales enablement software. It trades on NASDAQ.
Who are ZoomInfo's (GTM) competitors?
Notable peers of ZoomInfo (GTM) include Salesforce, HubSpot, Apollo.io, RocketReach and Hunter.io. This peer set is informational only — not financial advice.
Is ZoomInfo (GTM) overbought or oversold right now?
ZoomInfo (GTM) is currently neither overbought nor oversold — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 58, in the neutral middle (as of 2026-08-21). RSI describes recent price momentum, not a forecast — informational only, not financial advice.
Where does stocks-llm's data on GTM come from?
Fundamentals and prices come from market data, as of 2026-08-24; company filings and profile facts come from SEC EDGAR. All figures are delayed daily-close data shown with their as-of date — informational only, not financial advice.
Fundamentals: market data, as of 2026-08-24. Filings: SEC EDGAR. Prices are delayed daily-close data.
Last updated 2026-08-24.
Informational only — NOT financial advice. All figures are delayed daily-close data from SEC EDGAR & market data, shown with their as-of date.