Alliant Energy (LNT)
Utilities · Electric Utilities · NASDAQ
Alliant Energy is a regulated utility serving Iowa and Wisconsin, transitioning its energy mix toward renewables while meeting the infrastructure needs of large-load customers.
What Alliant Energy does
Alliant Energy is a regulated utility holding company that provides electric and natural gas service to customers in Iowa and Wisconsin through its subsidiaries, Interstate Power and Light Company (IPL) and Wisconsin Power and Light Company (WPL). The company focuses on the generation, distribution, and transmission of energy, with an increasing emphasis on renewable energy resources, energy storage, and serving large-load customers.
Themes: utility infrastructure, renewable energy transition, energy storage, large-load growth, data center power demand
Fundamentals
- Price$67.86 as of 2026-08-21 close
- Market cap$17.5B as of 2026-08-21
- 1-year return+2.6% 2025-08-21 close $66.11 → 2026-08-21 close $67.86
- P/E22.34 as of 2026-08-24
- Net margin+19.0% as of 2026-08-24
- Gross margin+39.3% as of 2026-08-24
- ROE+11.0% as of 2026-08-24
- Debt / equity1.61 as of 2026-08-24
- Revenue growth (YoY)+7.5% as of 2026-08-24
- Revenue CAGR (3y)+1.2% SEC XBRL
- Beta0.51 as of 2026-08-24
- Last reported earnings2026-07-31 SEC EDGAR Form 8-K (Item 2.02)
Dividend: yield +3.6%; at least 5 years of non-decreasing per-share dividends (SEC XBRL) — we do not hold the year before it, so the real streak may be longer.
How LNT compares in its sector
- price-to-earnings ratiomiddle range 67 covered Utilities peers, as of 2026-08-24
- net profit marginmiddle range 71 covered Utilities peers, as of 2026-08-24
- operating marginmiddle range 71 covered Utilities peers, as of 2026-08-24
- gross marginmiddle range 53 covered Utilities peers, as of 2026-08-24
- return on equitymiddle range 72 covered Utilities peers, as of 2026-08-24
- 3-year revenue CAGRmiddle range 70 covered Utilities peers
- indicated dividend yieldmiddle range 67 covered Utilities peers, as of 2026-08-24
Position among covered Utilities companies that report each metric (minimum 5 peers). A relative position within our covered catalog — not a valuation, quality, or investment judgment. A higher percentile is simply a higher value (for P/E, more expensive on earnings — never "better"). Informational only.
Top 10 scores & list membership
LNT is not currently in any published Top 10 list. Its scores are below.
Long-term score
45.0 #674 of 987 scored · #32 of 55 in Utilities
Capital return 71st (consecutive years of dividend increases 5 years) and profitability 52nd (operating margin 22.8%, return on equity 11%); weakest is financial health (24th, debt to equity 1.6).
Short-term score
40.7 #1361 of 1,704 scored · #44 of 59 in Utilities
Setup 48th: over the past year its closes ranged, and it has retraced well over two thirds of its move over the past year — 71% of it; momentum 42nd: near the bottom of its 14-day range (oversold); weakest is trend 35th: it is trading 7.3% below its 50-day average, the short-term trend line.
Scores as of 21 Aug 2026. Each bar is a percentile: how this company ranked against every company the score ranked, 0–100. A list is a published formula and its output, not a recommendation. Method version 2.
Dividend coverage (FY2025)
Covered by reported results. In FY2025, LNT's dividend was covered by reported results (earnings payout 64%, operating-cash-flow payout 45%). This describes past coverage, not a forecast.
- Earnings payout64% dividends / net income
- Operating-cash-flow payout45% dividends / operating cash flow — capital spending was not reported, so this does not subtract it
Coverage derived from reported SEC EDGAR XBRL figures for FY2025 (dividends paid vs. net income and free cash flow, same fiscal year). This describes PAST coverage for one fiscal year — it does not predict whether a dividend will be maintained, raised, or cut, and a one-year payout ratio can be distorted by non-recurring items. Informational only — not financial advice.
How Alliant Energy looks technically
Alliant Energy (LNT) is trading 3.4% below its 200-day average, the long-term trend line — a long-term downtrend. Its 50-day average crossed above its 200-day average about 560 trading days ago — a "golden cross", a bullish long-term signal. There is no clear trend right now — the price is choppy (ADX, a 0–100 trend-strength gauge, is 18, below the 25 that marks a real trend), though sellers have been pushing harder than buyers lately — pressure, not a trend. Momentum is neutral — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 32, neither overbought (above 70) nor oversold (below 30). MACD, a trend-momentum gauge, turned bearish about 1 trading day ago (its momentum flipped negative). It just made a new 20-day low, its first since 2026-02-09, breaking below its recent trading range.
Trend
7
| Distance from the 200-day | it is trading 3.4% below its 200-day average, the long-term trend line — a long-term downtrend | -3.4% |
|---|---|---|
| 50-day moving average | its average price over the last 50 trading days — a short-term trend line — is $73.21 | $73.21 |
| 200-day moving average | its average price over the last 200 trading days — the long-term trend line — is $70.28 | $70.28 |
| Swing structure | its recent peaks and dips disagree — one of them is rising while the other is not, so there is no clean up or down pattern in the swings | mixed — one of the two is not confirming |
| Last swing turn | its last significant turn was a swing low 10 calendar days ago — the swings before that are what the structure reading is measured on | 10 sessions |
| Since the 50/200 cross | its 50-day average crossed above its 200-day average about 560 trading days ago — a "golden cross", a bullish long-term signal | 560 sessions |
| Trend strength (14-day ADX) | there is no clear trend right now — the price is choppy (ADX, a 0–100 trend-strength gauge, is 18, below the 25 that marks a real trend), though sellers have been pushing harder than buyers lately — pressure, not a trend | 18.0 |
Momentum
3
| 14-day RSI | momentum is neutral — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 32, neither overbought (above 70) nor oversold (below 30) | 32.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Position in its 14-day range | it is trading near the bottom of its 14-day range ($67.54 to $71.46) — its "stochastic" reading is 8 out of 100, where 0 would mean closing exactly at the 14-session low and 100 exactly at the high. This measures WHERE the price sits inside its recent range, which is a different question from the RSI beside it: RSI is a momentum gauge, measuring how FAST the price has been moving, so a stock can drift quietly to the bottom of its range with an ordinary RSI, or fall sharply and still sit in the middle. It has been slipping within that range over the last few sessions. | 8.2 |
| Since the MACD crossed zero | MACD, a trend-momentum gauge, turned bearish about 1 trading day ago (its momentum flipped negative) | 1 session |
Range
12
| 52-week high | its highest closing price over the past year (about 252 trading days) was $78.81 | $78.81 |
|---|---|---|
| From the 52-week high | it is 13.9% below its 52-week high (its highest price of the past year) | -13.9% |
| Above the 52-week low | it is 7.2% above its 52-week low (its lowest price of the past year) | +7.2% |
| Below the 52-week high | it is 13.9% below its highest point of the past year | 13.9% |
| Since a 20-day breakout | it just made a new 20-day low, its first since 2026-02-09, breaking below its recent trading range | 1 session |
| Since a 55-day breakout | it just made a new 55-day low, its first since 2026-02-09, breaking below its recent trading range | 1 session |
| All-time high | its highest closing price on record is $78.81 (set on 2026-07-07) | $78.81 |
| Given back of the 52-week move | over the past year its closes ranged ($63.62 to $78.03), and it has given back well over two thirds of its rise from last year’s low — 71% of it. Chart-watchers call 61.8%-65% given back the "golden pocket" — for this company that is $68.66 to $69.12. It is watched widely enough that orders cluster there, which is the honest reason it matters; it is not a forecast. | 70.6% |
| From the all-time high | it is 13.9% below its all-time high | -13.9% |
| Nearest price level | it is sitting right on a support level at $67.82 — a price it turned at three times since 2026-01-21, most recently on 2026-08-11. Since 2024-08-21 it has 7 such levels below the current price and 4 above. Levels like these describe where the price has reversed or paused before; they are not a forecast of where it will go. | -0.1% |
| All-time low | its lowest closing price on record is $10.15 (set on 2009-03-09) | $10.15 |
| Above the all-time low | it is 568.2% above its all-time low | +568.2% |
Volatility
5
| Band width vs its own 6 months | day-to-day price swings are about average versus its own recent 6-month history | 65th percentile |
|---|---|---|
| Typical daily range | in a typical session it travels about $1.39 between its high and its low — about 2.1% of its price. That is its "average true range" over the last 14 sessions, which also counts the distance from the previous close, so a day that opens well away from yesterday counts as the large move it was | $1.39 |
| Bollinger bands (20-day, ±2σ) | most of its recent trading has stayed between about $67.39 and $73.41 — the "Bollinger bands", a range drawn two standard deviations either side of its 20-day average price, which widens when the stock gets more volatile and narrows when it settles | $67.39 – $70.40 – $73.41 |
| Typical daily range (% of price) | its price moves about 2.1% in a typical session — calmer than most companies we cover. This is the average gap between a session's high and low over the last 14 sessions, counting overnight moves, expressed against the current price so it can be compared with companies trading at any price | 2.0% |
| Stretch from the 200-day average | it is trading 1.7 daily ranges below its 200-day average price (3.4% below it in plain percentage terms) — a way of asking how far it has stretched from its own average in units of how far it normally moves in a day, so a calm company and a jumpy one can be compared on the same scale | 1.7 daily ranges below its 200-day average |
Volume
1
| Volume vs its 30-day average | trading volume is about normal versus its 30-day average | 0.78× |
|---|
Analyst
2
| Change in the average price target | analysts have raised their average price target by 0.1% since the prior reading | +0.1% |
|---|---|---|
| Change in the consensus rating | the analyst consensus rating has softened toward "sell" since the prior reading | 0.07 toward sell |
Candlestick patterns
2
| Since a bullish engulfing | 5 sessions ago it opened below the previous session's close and finished above that session's open — a "bullish engulfing" pair, where one up day more than undid the down day before it | 5 sessions ago |
|---|---|---|
| Since a bearish engulfing | 3 sessions ago it opened above the previous session's close and finished below that session's open — a "bearish engulfing" pair, where one down day more than undid the up day before it | 3 sessions ago |
Price gaps
2
| Gap at the open | it opened on 2026-08-21 0.4% above the previous session's close — an overnight gap, the part of the move that happened while the market was shut, and traded back through that level before the close | +0.4% |
|---|---|---|
| Gap filled | a 2.2% gap up opened on 2026-06-11 has been "filled" 17 sessions ago — price traded back through the level the gap left behind, and it took 31 sessions to close | 17 sessions ago |
Price streaks
1
| Closing streak | it has closed lower 2 sessions in a row, a -3.26% move over the run — an unbroken run of down days, which describes what has already happened and says nothing about the next session | 2 sessions down |
|---|
Relative strength
4
| vs market, 1 month | over the past 1 month this stock lagged the market by 9.5 percentage points (the stock lost 7.2% while the market gained 2.3%) | -9.5% |
|---|---|---|
| vs market, 3 months | over the past 3 months this stock lagged the market by 10.5 percentage points (the stock lost 7.4% while the market gained 3.1%) | -10.5% |
| vs market, 6 months | over the past 6 months this stock lagged the market by 15.5 percentage points (the stock lost 4.4% while the market gained 11.1%) | -15.5% |
| vs market, 12 months | over the past 12 months this stock lagged the market by 17.8 percentage points (the stock gained 2.6% while the market gained 20.5%) | -17.8% |
Signal agreement
2
| Bullish technical signals | 2 of the 9 technical signals we can compute for it are currently in a bullish state: a "golden cross" — its 50-day average is above its 200-day, near the bottom of its 14-day range (oversold) — these describe past price behaviour, not a forecast | 2 of 9 |
|---|---|---|
| Bearish technical signals | 5 of the 9 technical signals we can compute for it are currently in a bearish state: trading below its 200-day average, a fresh 20-day low, MACD momentum is negative, lagging the market over 6 months, trading below the Ichimoku cloud — these describe past price behaviour, not a forecast | 5 of 9 |
Trend (Ichimoku cloud)
1
| Vs the Ichimoku cloud | trading 8.5% below the Ichimoku cloud — a band drawn from where its own highs and lows sat up to 2026-07-16 and projected forward over today's price, the side traders read as an established downtrend, with the band above acting as the level that would have to be cleared. The band itself is moderate, spanning 2.1% of the share price. | -8.5% |
|---|
Volume-weighted price
2
| Vs this year’s average price paid | the price is 5% below the average price paid so far this year, so the typical buyer over that stretch is under water. That average is $71.26 — a volume-weighted average of daily closes over 156 sessions, not a true tick-by-tick VWAP. | -4.8% |
|---|---|---|
| Vs the average paid since it last reported | the price is 3% below the average price paid since it last reported on 2026-07-31 (its 10-Q), so the typical buyer over that stretch is under water. That average is $69.93 — a volume-weighted average of daily closes over 16 sessions, not a true tick-by-tick VWAP. | -3.0% |
Price levels it has turned at before
LNT last closed at $67.86 on 2026-08-21. Since 2024-08-21 it has turned at 7 prices below its last close and 4 above; the 3 nearest below and the 3 nearest above are listed, nearest first.
| Level | Side | Distance | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| $67.82 | Support | 0.1% below the last close | turned there three times · 2026-01-21 to 2026-08-11 |
| $66.29 | Support | 2.3% below the last close | turned there 7 times · 2025-03-04 to 2025-12-18 |
| $69.51 | Resistance | 2.4% above the last close | turned there four times · 2025-10-16 to 2026-06-01 |
| $70.70 | Resistance | 4.2% above the last close | turned there three times · 2026-03-12 to 2026-05-15 |
| $64.20 | Support | 5.4% below the last close | turned there 10 times · 2024-11-25 to 2026-02-02 |
| $72.67 | Resistance | 7.1% above the last close | turned there four times · 2026-02-17 to 2026-07-21 |
A level is a price this company reversed or paused at more than once — they describe past behaviour, not a forecast of where the price will go.
Wave structure
No Elliott-wave labelling currently fits its swings: the recent highs and lows do not satisfy the three rules a five-wave count has to obey, so there is no count to show rather than a count we are unsure about.
Read from daily closes as of 2026-08-21.
An Elliott-wave count describes the swings already printed and the level that would disprove it. It is not a forecast, a target, or advice.
Screens: Trading below the 200-day moving average · Broke down to a new 20-day low · MACD just crossed bearish (12/26/9) · trendless / choppy (low ADX) · lagging the market · At the bottom of its 14-day range (stochastic below 20) | Learn: moving average · golden cross · adx · rsi · macd · breakout
Based on daily closing prices as of 2026-08-21. Describes past price behavior only — informational, not financial advice.
Analyst consensus
- Consensus ratingBuy (1.92 mean, 1=Strong Buy…5=Strong Sell) — 12 analysts
- Mean price target$78.54 range $73.00 – $86.00; median $78.00
Analyst estimates, as of 2026-08-22. These are third-party analyst opinions and price targets, aggregated — not a recommendation, prediction, or advice from stocks-llm. Informational only.
Analyst EPS estimate for LNT
- Consensus EPS estimate$1.23 next reporting period, as of 2026-08-22
Change over time is not available yet: it needs two readings of the same reporting period at least 30 days apart, and we have been recording these estimates since 2026-08-04. An estimate for a DIFFERENT quarter is not a revision, so a reading from before the last report is never compared with one after it.
The consensus estimate for the next reporting period, and how it has moved between readings of that SAME period. A change is measured only between readings estimating one period — when a company reports, the consensus moves to the next quarter and the two numbers are not comparable. Informational only, not a forecast and not advice.
Key risks (from latest filing)
["Ability to obtain timely and adequate rate relief from regulators.","Risks associated with construction timelines, costs, and regulatory approval for generation and energy storage projects.","Impact of cybersecurity incidents on infrastructure and operations."]
What changed in the latest 10-Q
AI-assisted comparison of LNT's 10-Q filed 2026-05-01 against the prior one filed 2025-11-07.
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
- Added:
- 2026 filing references 2025 Form 10-K instead of 2024 Form 10-K (newer filing period)
- In March 2026, IUC approved advance rate-making principles for IPL for up to 1,000 MW of new wind generation with fixed cost cap of $3,020/kilowatt (filed 2026-05-01)
- In March 2026, WPL filed certificate of authority application with PSCW for Riverside Energy Center capacity and efficiency maintenance/increase; decision expected Q1 2027 (filed 2026-05-01)
- In April 2026, IPL filed certificate of public convenience, use and necessity application with IUC for approximately 720 MW simple-cycle natural gas-fired EGU in Linn County, Iowa; decision expected Q1 2027 (filed 2026-05-01)
- In April 2026, IPL entered into electric service agreement with customer for data center with contracted peak demand of approximately 370 MW (filed 2026-05-01)
- In April 2026, EPA proposed rule significantly reducing scope of CCR Rule, anticipated finalized by end of 2026 (filed 2026-05-01)
- In April 2026, State of Wisconsin enacted 2025 Wisconsin Act 193 requiring utilities to include capacity costs and revenues in annual fuel cost plans, applicable to plans filed on or after January 1, 2027 (filed 2026-05-01)
- Financial results table showing Q1 2026 vs Q1 2025 diluted EPS comparisons for Utilities and Corporate Services, ATC Holdings, Non-utility and Parent, and Alliant Energy Consolidated (filed 2026-05-01)
- Detailed net income variance analysis for three months ended March 31, 2026 vs 2025 (filed 2026-05-01)
- Electric and gas revenues and sales summary table for Q1 2026 vs Q1 2025 for Alliant Energy, IPL, and WPL (filed 2026-05-01)
- Removed:
- Reference to six-year generation investment plan of approximately 2,000 MW natural gas, 1,300 MW energy storage, 1,100 MW renewable generation, 530 MW improvements, and 450 MW wind refurbishments (filed 2025-11-07)
- February 2025 WPL filing for 2 billion cubic feet liquified natural gas facility in Rock County, Wisconsin; decision expected Q2 2026 (filed 2025-11-07)
- April 2025 PSCW order authorizing WPL 17.5 MW natural gas-fired RICE EGU at Riverside Energy Center (filed 2025-11-07)
- April 2025 WPL filing for Bent Tree North EGU approximately 153 MW wind farm; decision expected Q2 2026 (filed 2025-11-07)
- May 2025 PSCW order authorizing WPL Bent Tree wind farm refurbishment (filed 2025-11-07)
- June 2025 IUC order authorizing IPL Cedar River Generating Station 94 MW natural gas-fired RICE EGU at Prairie Creek (filed 2025-11-07)
- June 2025 PSCW order authorizing WPL approximately 20 MW compressed carbon dioxide-based long-duration energy storage at Columbia Energy Center (filed 2025-11-07)
- July 2025 IPL filing for advance rate-making principles for 1,000 MW new wind generation with $3,020/kilowatt fixed cost cap and 11.25% return on common equity; decision expected Q1 2026 (filed 2025-11-07)
- July 2025 IUC order authorizing IPL up to 150 MW energy storage at retired Lansing Generating Station (filed 2025-11-07)
- July 2025 WPL completion of approximately 100 MW energy storage at Grant County solar facility (filed 2025-11-07)
- August 2025 IUC order authorizing IPL up to 75 MW energy storage at Golden Plains wind farm (filed 2025-11-07)
- August 2025 IPL filing for 720 MW simple-cycle natural gas-fired EGU (Bobcat Energy Center) at Marshalltown Generating Station; decision expected Q1 2026 (filed 2025-11-07)
- September 2025 IUC order authorizing IPL up to 75 MW energy storage at Whispering Willow-North wind farm (filed 2025-11-07)
- October 2025 WPL completion of approximately 75 MW energy storage at Wood County solar facility (filed 2025-11-07)
- November 2025 IPL filing for 94 MW natural gas-fired RICE EGU at Burlington Generating Station; decision expected Q1 2026 (filed 2025-11-07)
- September 2025 WPL unanimous settlement agreement filing with PSCW for 2026/2027 forward-looking Test Period with annual incremental rate increases, return on common equity of 9.8%, and earnings sharing mechanism details (filed 2025-11-07)
- IPL expected fourth quarter 2025 subsequent proceeding filing with IUC for October 2024 through September 2025 forward-looking Test Period retail electric and gas rate reviews (filed 2025-11-07)
- WPL data center electric service agreements with two customers with aggregate peak demands referenced (filed 2025-11-07)
- Reworded:
- Highlights section header changed from '2025 HIGHLIGHTS' to '2026 HIGHLIGHTS' reflecting newer filing period
- Customer Investments section restructured to focus on recent approvals and filings in 2026 rather than six-year forward plan (older vs newer)
- Energy storage project descriptions changed from construction completion dates to advance rate-making principles and applications
- Growing Customer Demand section changed from referencing 'two new customers' with data center agreements at WPL to single customer agreement with IPL for approximately 370 MW contracted peak demand
- Notes:
- Older filing (2025-11-07) covered nine-month period ending September 30, 2025, while newer filing (2026-05-01) covered three-month period ending March 31, 2026; different reporting periods affect comparability
- Text truncated in original source at 'Sales Trends and Temperatures - All ia' in newer filing, preventing full comparison of that section
- Older filing shows November 2025 WPL settlement details reflecting future periods (2026/2027), while newer filing shows executed events as of March 31, 2026
Risk Factors
- Added:
- Added definition of 'SEC' (Securities and Exchange Commission) in Definitions table in newer filing (2026-05-01)
- Added reference to 'costs of cancelled generation projects incurred prior to pursuing regulatory approval' in rate relief bullet point (2026-05-01)
- Added 'or other non-traditional service models' to description of customer- and third party-owned generation impact (2026-05-01)
- Added 'regulatory changes, or legislation' language regarding behind-the-meter generation options (2026-05-01)
- Added 'the ability and cost to attract large load growth customers' phrasing (2026-05-01)
- Added reference to 'supply chain disruptions which may result from geopolitical issues' as separate item (2026-05-01)
- Added 'the ability to obtain siting and environmental permits from local and state agencies' and transmission upgrade completion requirements (2026-05-01)
- Added 'antidumping or countervailing duties' to tariffs and assessments language (2026-05-01)
- Added 'siting, or permitting actions' and 'public or community opposition' in large load growth customer facilities construction bullet (2026-05-01)
- Added '/or financing support' to tax benefits bullet regarding construction and financing support from foreign-tied entities (2026-05-01)
- Removed:
- Removed definition of 'West Riverside' (West Riverside Energy Center and Solar Facility) from Definitions table (older filing 2025-11-07)
- Removed 'and those that may be generated in the future' language regarding tax credit utilization (older filing 2025-11-07)
- Removed separate bullet point on 'the ability to utilize tax credits generated to date, and those that may be generated in the future, before they expire, as well as the ability to transfer tax credits that may be generated in the future at adequate pricing' (older filing 2025-11-07)
- Removed separate bullet point on 'the impacts of changes in the tax code, including tax rates, minimum tax rates, adjustments made to deferred tax assets and liabilities, and changes impacting the availability of and ability to transfer renewable tax credits' (older filing 2025-11-07)
- Removed 'and siting generation and energy storage projects' from federal and state regulatory actions bullet (older filing 2025-11-07)
- Removed reference to 'supplier manufacturing constraints' from disruptions bullet (older filing 2025-11-07)
- Removed 'Midwest LLC' designation after 'ITC' in generation/transmission capacity bullet (newer filing uses 'ITC' alone)
- Reworded:
- Changed '2024 Form 10-K' to '2025 Form 10-K' in Definitions (reflects year-end change from Dec. 31, 2024 to Dec. 31, 2025)
- Changed 'costs of generation projects including such costs that are incurred prior to regulatory approval or exceed initial estimates' to 'costs of cancelled generation projects incurred prior to pursuing regulatory approval, as well as costs of generation projects incurred prior to regulatory approval or that exceed initial estimates' (2026-05-01)
- Changed 'the ability to complete construction of generation and energy storage projects by planned in-service dates and within the cost targets set by regulators due to cost increases of and access to materials, equipment and commodities' to 'with the expected earnings contributions and within the cost targets' (2026-05-01)
- Changed 'the impact of customer- and third party-owned generation, including alternative electric suppliers and potential policy changes that may enable large customers to source behind-the-meter generation directly from third parties' to expanded language with 'other non-traditional service models' and additional options (2026-05-01)
- Changed 'the ability and cost to provide sufficient generation and the ability of ITC Midwest LLC and ATC' to 'the ability and cost to attract large load growth customers and to provide sufficient generation and the ability of ITC and ATC' (2026-05-01)
- Changed 'zoning or permitting actions, public opposition or other factors' to 'zoning, siting, or permitting actions, public or community opposition or other factors' (2026-05-01)
- Changed 'sourcing permissible amounts of construction support from entities with ties to certain foreign countries' to 'sourcing permissible amounts of construction and/or financing support from entities with ties to certain foreign countries' (2026-05-01)
- Notes:
- Both filings appear truncated at the end of the Forward-Looking Statements section, limiting full comparison of complete risk factors
- Page number changes (32-33 in newer vs 39-41 in older) reflect different document lengths but are not substantive content changes
- The section comparison ends mid-sentence in both versions, so complete risk factors list cannot be fully assessed
AI-assisted comparison of two SEC filing sections. It describes wording and theme changes only, makes no materiality, legal, or investment judgement, and is not financial advice. Informational only — not financial advice.
Insider activity (SEC Form 4)
No open-market insider purchases or sales are on record for LNT — recent Form 4 activity was compensation-related (awards, option exercises, or tax withholding), not open-market buying or selling.
View full insider trading history → View SEC Form 3/4/5 filingsOnly open-market purchases (SEC code P) and sales (code S) are counted here. Option exercises, vesting/awards, gifts, and shares withheld for taxes are excluded — they are compensation or mechanical, not open-market conviction. Sales may be planned and non-discretionary (e.g. a Rule 10b5-1 plan) and are not necessarily bearish; open-market buying is not a recommendation to buy. Informational only — not financial advice.
Congressional trading disclosures
U.S. House members publicly disclose their own, their spouse's, and dependent children's stock transactions under the STOCK Act. We hold 2 matched disclosures for LNT from U.S. House Clerk Periodic Transaction Report filings.
Congressional trading disclosures →Institutional ownership (13F)
5 institutional 13F filers reported holding LNT as of 2026-03-31 (quarter-end position, filed within 45 days).
- Distinct 13F filers 5
- Reported shares held 45,418,263
- Reported value $3,259,214,513
reported quarterly holdings change (2025-12-31 → 2026-03-31): 0 new, 4 increased, 1 decreased, 0 exited. Change counts cover only managers that filed 13F reports in BOTH quarters, derived between two quarter-end snapshots — not same-day trades; a single manager is never said to have "bought" or "sold".
Institutional holdings are quarter-end long positions reported on SEC Form 13F-HR, filed up to 45 days after the quarter ends — they are delayed, are not real-time trades, exclude short positions and most non-US securities, and are not investment advice. Any increase/decrease is a reported change between two quarterly snapshots, not a same-day purchase or sale. These are quarter-end snapshots from the 13F filings on SEC EDGAR, filed within 45 days — not real-time, and any change is a difference between two quarterly reports, not a same-day trade. Informational only — not financial advice.
Short interest (FINRA)
LNT had 27,263,556 shares of reported short interest as of the 2026-07-31 FINRA settlement date (delayed, bi-monthly; not real-time).
LNT had 10.6% of its shares outstanding sold short as of the 2026-07-31 FINRA settlement date (percent of FLOAT would be higher — float is not disclosed in the source). FINRA reported 10.73 days to cover at the same settlement.
- Reported short interest (shares) 27,263,556
- Short interest (% of shares outstanding) 10.6%
- Prior settlement (shares) 27,969,712
- Reported change -2.52%
- Days to cover (reported) 10.73
Reported to FINRA as of the 2026-07-31 settlement date. Short interest is reported to FINRA and published on a delayed, bi-monthly schedule (as of a settlement date, disseminated roughly eight business days later) — it is NOT real-time, does not cover every venue or all US trading, and is not a short-squeeze prediction or investment advice. Days-to-cover is the value FINRA reports; percent of float is not shown because the source file carries no share-count denominator — where a percent appears it is of shares OUTSTANDING, the larger base, and is therefore a floor on percent of float. Informational only — not financial advice.
Competitors & peers
- Xcel Energy (XEL)
- WEC Energy Group (WEC)
- Ameren (AEE)
- Entergy (ETR)
- NextEra Energy (NEE)
- CMS Energy (CMS)
AI-enriched competitor set. Linked names are companies covered by stocks-llm; other named peers are shown for reference only.
Compare LNT vs…
Alliant Energy is found in…
Frequently asked questions
What does Alliant Energy (LNT) do?
Alliant Energy is a regulated utility holding company that provides electric and natural gas service to customers in Iowa and Wisconsin through its subsidiaries, Interstate Power and Light Company (IPL) and Wisconsin Power and Light Company (WPL). The company focuses on the generation, distribution, and transmission of energy, with an increasing emphasis on renewable energy resources, energy storage, and serving large-load customers.
What sector is Alliant Energy (LNT) in?
Alliant Energy (LNT) is classified in the Utilities sector. Its industry is Electric Utilities. It trades on NASDAQ.
Does LNT pay a dividend?
Yes — Alliant Energy (LNT) pays a dividend, with an indicated yield of about 3.64% and at least 5 years of non-decreasing per-share dividends (SEC EDGAR XBRL) — we do not hold the year before it, so the real streak may be longer (market data, as of 2026-08-24). Informational only — not financial advice.
Who are Alliant Energy's (LNT) competitors?
Notable peers of Alliant Energy (LNT) include Xcel Energy, WEC Energy Group, Ameren, Entergy and NextEra Energy. This peer set is informational only — not financial advice.
Has there been recent Congressional stock trading in LNT?
Yes — we hold 2 matched STOCK Act disclosures for LNT from U.S. House Clerk Periodic Transaction Report filings. These are legally-required disclosures (often filed 30–45 days after the trade), may belong to a U.S. House member, their spouse, or a dependent child, and are not an indicator of company performance or investment advice.
Is Alliant Energy (LNT) overbought or oversold right now?
Alliant Energy (LNT) is currently neither overbought nor oversold — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 32, in the neutral middle (as of 2026-08-21). RSI describes recent price momentum, not a forecast — informational only, not financial advice.
Where does stocks-llm's data on LNT come from?
Fundamentals and prices come from market data, as of 2026-08-24; company filings and profile facts come from SEC EDGAR. All figures are delayed daily-close data shown with their as-of date — informational only, not financial advice.
Fundamentals: market data, as of 2026-08-24. Filings: SEC EDGAR. Prices are delayed daily-close data.
Last updated 2026-08-21.
Informational only — NOT financial advice. All figures are delayed daily-close data from SEC EDGAR & market data, shown with their as-of date.