RIMINI STREET INC (RMNI)
Information Technology · Enterprise Software Support & Managed Services · NASDAQ
Rimini Street provides third-party enterprise software support and managed services that enable organizations to extend the life of their existing ERP investments.
What RIMINI STREET INC does
Rimini Street provides enterprise software support and managed services for enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems, allowing clients to maintain their existing software rather than migrating to new vendor versions. The company offers a portfolio of services under its "Rimini Smart Path" brand, including maintenance, security, and increasingly, AI-driven solutions for managing complex ERP environments.
Themes: enterprise software support, ERP optimization, IT managed services, Agentic AI, legacy software maintenance, cloud migration alternatives
Fundamentals
- Price$4.10 as of 2026-10-08 close
- Market cap$382M as of 2026-07-28 (share count; price 2026-10-08)
- 1-year return-10.6% 2025-10-08 close $4.58 → 2026-10-08 close $4.10
- P/E53.60 as of 2026-10-08
- Net margin+6.0% FY2023, SEC XBRL
- Gross margin+62.3% FY2023, SEC XBRL
- Debt / equity0.00 as of 2026-09-02
- Revenue growth (YoY)+0.6% as of 2026-09-02
- Revenue CAGR (3y)+9.7% SEC XBRL
- Beta0.94 as of 2026-09-02
- Last reported earnings2026-07-30 SEC EDGAR Form 8-K (Item 2.02)
How RMNI compares in its sector
- price-to-earnings ratiomiddle range 253 covered Information Technology peers, as of 2026-10-08
- net profit marginmiddle range 380 covered Information Technology peers, as of 2026-09-02
- operating marginmiddle range 375 covered Information Technology peers, as of 2026-09-02
- gross marginmiddle range 311 covered Information Technology peers, as of 2026-09-02
- 3-year revenue CAGRmiddle range 385 covered Information Technology peers
- free cash flow (absolute dollars, latest fiscal year)middle range 382 covered Information Technology peers, as of FY2025
Position among covered Information Technology companies that report each metric (minimum 5 peers). A relative position within our covered catalog — not a valuation, quality, or investment judgment. A higher percentile is simply a higher value (for P/E, more expensive on earnings — never "better"). Informational only.
Dividend coverage
Not assessed — last reported dividend predates the accounts. The most recent fiscal year in which RMNI reported a dividend payment is FY2021, while its reported financial statements run through FY2025. Coverage is therefore not assessed for the latest year — an FY2021 ratio would not describe RMNI today.
Coverage is derived from reported SEC EDGAR XBRL figures, comparing dividends paid against net income and free cash flow for the SAME fiscal year. It is not shown here because the latest fiscal year with a reported dividend payment (FY2021) is older than the latest year of reported financial statements (FY2025), so any ratio would describe an out-of-date year. Informational only — not financial advice.
How RIMINI STREET INC looks technically
RIMINI STREET INC (RMNI) is trading 1.7% above its 200-day average, the long-term trend line — a longer-term uptrend. Its 50-day average crossed above its 200-day average about 69 trading days ago — a "golden cross", a bullish long-term signal. A strong downtrend is in place — ADX, a 0–100 trend-strength gauge, is 30, with sellers in control. Momentum is neutral — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 33, neither overbought (above 70) nor oversold (below 30). It made a new 20-day low about 2 trading days ago. It is 27.9% below its highest point of the past year. Trading volume is unusually light — only about 49% of its 30-day average.
Trend
8
| Distance from the 200-day | it is trading 1.7% above its 200-day average, the long-term trend line — a longer-term uptrend | +1.7% |
|---|---|---|
| 50-day moving average | its average price over the last 50 trading days — a short-term trend line — is $4.74 | $4.74 |
| 200-day moving average | its average price over the last 200 trading days — the long-term trend line — is $4.02 | $4.02 |
| Swing structure | each recent peak has been higher than the one before it and each dip has been shallower — the pattern chart-watchers call an uptrend, which describes where price has already been and not where it goes next | higher highs and higher lows |
| Last swing turn | its last significant turn was a swing high 38 calendar days ago — the swings before that are what the structure reading is measured on | 38 sessions |
| Wave structure | its recent swings can be read as a completed five-part upward sequence — the pattern Elliott-wave chartists call an impulse — which on that reading would now be due a pullback rather than more of the same; the labelling fails if price closes above 5.68. It is the only labelling that fits, though not with textbook proportions, and it describes the swings already printed, not what comes next. | possible five-wave upward sequence, complete (atypical proportions) |
| Since the 50/200 cross | its 50-day average crossed above its 200-day average about 69 trading days ago — a "golden cross", a bullish long-term signal | 69 sessions |
| Trend strength (14-day ADX) | a strong downtrend is in place — ADX, a 0–100 trend-strength gauge, is 30, with sellers in control | 29.6 |
Momentum
3
| 14-day RSI | momentum is neutral — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 33, neither overbought (above 70) nor oversold (below 30) | 32.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Position in its 14-day range | it is trading near the bottom of its 14-day range ($4.03 to $4.47) — its "stochastic" reading is 15 out of 100, where 0 would mean closing exactly at the 14-session low and 100 exactly at the high. This measures WHERE the price sits inside its recent range, which is a different question from the RSI beside it: RSI is a momentum gauge, measuring how FAST the price has been moving, so a stock can drift quietly to the bottom of its range with an ordinary RSI, or fall sharply and still sit in the middle. It has been climbing within that range over the last few sessions. | 14.8 |
| Since the MACD crossed zero | MACD, a trend-momentum gauge, is in negative territory (momentum leaning bearish) | 26 sessions |
Range
12
| 52-week high | its highest closing price over the past year (about 252 trading days) was $5.68 | $5.68 |
|---|---|---|
| From the 52-week high | it is 27.9% below its 52-week high (its highest price of the past year) | -27.9% |
| Above the 52-week low | it is 42.7% above its 52-week low (its lowest price of the past year) | +42.7% |
| Below the 52-week high | it is 27.9% below its highest point of the past year | 27.9% |
| Since a 20-day breakout | it made a new 20-day low about 2 trading days ago | 2 sessions |
| Since a 55-day breakout | it made a new 55-day low about 2 trading days ago | 2 sessions |
| All-time high | its highest closing price on record is $11.52 (set on 2021-11-03) | $11.52 |
| Given back of the 52-week move | over the past year its closes ranged ($2.97 to $5.65), and it has given back a bit over half of its rise from last year’s low — 58% of it. Chart-watchers call 61.8%-65% given back the "golden pocket" — for this company that is $3.91 to $3.99. It is watched widely enough that orders cluster there, which is the honest reason it matters; it is not a forecast. | 58.0% |
| From the all-time high | it is 64.5% below its all-time high | -64.5% |
| Nearest price level | it is trading 0.6% below a resistance level at $4.12 — a price it turned at five times since 2025-03-17, most recently on 2026-05-01. Since 2024-10-08 it has 7 such levels below the current price and 4 above. Levels like these describe where the price has reversed or paused before; they are not a forecast of where it will go. | +0.6% |
| All-time low | its lowest closing price on record is $1.53 (set on 2024-10-30) | $1.53 |
| Above the all-time low | it is 167.6% above its all-time low | +167.7% |
Volatility
5
| Band width vs its own 6 months | day-to-day price swings are narrower than usual versus its own recent 6-month history (tighter than about 81% of it) | 19th percentile |
|---|---|---|
| Typical daily range | in a typical session it travels about $0.1447 between its high and its low — about 3.5% of its price. That is its "average true range" over the last 14 sessions, which also counts the distance from the previous close, so a day that opens well away from yesterday counts as the large move it was | $0.1447 |
| Bollinger bands (20-day, ±2σ) | most of its recent trading has stayed between about $3.98 and $4.63 — the "Bollinger bands", a range drawn two standard deviations either side of its 20-day average price, which widens when the stock gets more volatile and narrows when it settles | $3.98 – $4.31 – $4.63 |
| Typical daily range (% of price) | its price moves about 3.5% in a typical session — about typical for the companies we cover. This is the average gap between a session's high and low over the last 14 sessions, counting overnight moves, expressed against the current price so it can be compared with companies trading at any price | 3.5% |
| Stretch from the 200-day average | it is trading 0.5 daily ranges above its 200-day average price (1.7% above it in plain percentage terms) — a way of asking how far it has stretched from its own average in units of how far it normally moves in a day, so a calm company and a jumpy one can be compared on the same scale | 0.5 daily ranges above its 200-day average |
Volume
1
| Volume vs its 30-day average | trading volume is unusually light — only about 49% of its 30-day average | 0.49× |
|---|
Analyst
2
| Change in the average price target | analysts' average price target is unchanged from the prior reading | 0.0% |
|---|---|---|
| Change in the consensus rating | not available for this company yet | n/a |
Candlestick patterns
2
| Since a doji | 1 session ago it opened and closed at almost the same price after trading through a wider range — a "doji", the classic picture of buyers and sellers finishing the session level | 1 session ago |
|---|---|---|
| Since a bearish engulfing | 4 sessions ago it opened above the previous session's close and finished below that session's open — a "bearish engulfing" pair, where one down day more than undid the up day before it | 4 sessions ago |
Price gaps
2
| Gap at the open | it opened on 2026-10-08 at essentially the same price it closed at the session before — no meaningful overnight gap | 0.0% |
|---|---|---|
| Gap filled | a 2.2% gap up opened on 2026-10-06 has been "filled" 2 sessions ago — price traded back through the level the gap left behind, and it closed again during the very session that opened it | 2 sessions ago |
Price streaks
1
| Closing streak | it closed higher in its latest session, after a session that did not close higher — a single up day rather than a run | 1 session up |
|---|
Relative strength
4
| vs market, 1 month | over the past 1 month this stock lagged the market by 15.7 percentage points (the stock lost 14.7% while the market gained 1.0%) | -15.7% |
|---|---|---|
| vs market, 3 months | over the past 3 months this stock lagged the market by 16.1 percentage points (the stock lost 12.3% while the market gained 3.8%) | -16.1% |
| vs market, 6 months | over the past 6 months this stock beat the market by 1.6 percentage points (the stock gained 19.0% while the market gained 17.5%) | +1.6% |
| vs market, 12 months | over the past 12 months this stock lagged the market by 25.6 percentage points (the stock lost 10.6% while the market gained 15.0%) | -25.6% |
Signal agreement
2
| Bullish technical signals | 4 of the 9 technical signals we can compute for it are currently in a bullish state: a "golden cross" — its 50-day average is above its 200-day, trading above its 200-day average, outperforming the market over 6 months, near the bottom of its 14-day range (oversold) — these describe past price behaviour, not a forecast | 4 of 9 |
|---|---|---|
| Bearish technical signals | 4 of the 9 technical signals we can compute for it are currently in a bearish state: a fresh 20-day low, MACD momentum is negative, a strong downtrend, with sellers in control, trading below the Ichimoku cloud — these describe past price behaviour, not a forecast | 4 of 9 |
Trend (Ichimoku cloud)
1
| Vs the Ichimoku cloud | trading 15% below the Ichimoku cloud — a band drawn from where its own highs and lows sat up to 2026-09-01 and projected forward over today's price, the side traders read as an established downtrend, with the band above acting as the level that would have to be cleared. The band itself is thick, spanning 8.8% of the share price, which is taken to mean a barrier that has held for a while and takes effort to cross. | -15.5% |
|---|
Volume-weighted price
2
| Vs this year’s average price paid | the price is sitting right on the average price paid so far this year, so the typical buyer over that stretch is roughly break-even. That average is $4.10 — a volume-weighted average of daily closes over 188 sessions, not a true tick-by-tick VWAP. | -0.2% |
|---|---|---|
| Vs the average paid since it last reported | the price is 15% below the average price paid since it last reported on 2026-07-30 (its 10-Q), so the typical buyer over that stretch is under water. That average is $4.82 — a volume-weighted average of daily closes over 50 sessions, not a true tick-by-tick VWAP. | -15.0% |
Price levels it has turned at before
RMNI last closed at $4.09 on 2026-10-08. Since 2024-10-08 it has turned at 7 prices below its last close and 4 above; the 3 nearest below and the 3 nearest above are listed, nearest first.
| Level | Side | Distance | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| $4.12 | Resistance | 0.6% above the last close | turned there five times · 2025-03-17 to 2026-05-01 |
| $4.02 | Support | 1.8% below the last close | turned there twice · 2026-01-08 to 2026-06-22 |
| $4.22 | Resistance | 3.0% above the last close | turned there twice · 2025-10-17 to 2026-07-23 |
| $3.71 | Support | 9.3% below the last close | turned there three times · 2025-02-18 to 2025-05-27 |
| $3.62 | Support | 11.7% below the last close | turned there three times · 2025-04-09 to 2025-11-21 |
| $4.89 | Resistance | 19.5% above the last close | turned there three times · 2025-09-11 to 2026-07-10 |
A level is a price this company reversed or paused at more than once — they describe past behaviour, not a forecast of where the price will go.
Wave structure
Its recent swings can be read as a five-part upward sequence — what Elliott-wave chartists call an impulse — now complete.
This labelling fails — stops being a possible reading at all — if it closes above $5.68.
It is the only labelling that fits these swings, though its proportions are not the textbook ones. It was chosen from 2 labellings that survived the rules, counting shorter readings of the same bars.
This reading has stood for 24 trading days, since 2026-09-04.
Read from daily closes as of 2026-10-08.
An Elliott-wave count describes the swings already printed and the level that would disprove it. It is not a forecast, a target, or advice.
Screens: Near 200-day moving-average support · Trading above the 200-day moving average · Pulled back from the 12-month high · Broke down to a new 20-day low · At the bottom of its 14-day range (stochastic below 20) · Trading at this year’s average price paid (anchored VWAP) | Learn: moving average · golden cross · adx · rsi · breakout · fifty two week high low · volume and relative volume
Based on daily closing prices as of 2026-10-08. Describes past price behavior only — informational, not financial advice.
Analyst consensus
- Mean price target$7.00 range $6.50 – $8.00; median $6.75
Analyst estimates, as of 2026-10-05. These are third-party analyst opinions and price targets, aggregated — not a recommendation, prediction, or advice from stocks-llm. Informational only.
Analyst EPS estimate for RMNI
- Consensus EPS estimate$0.1 next reporting period, as of 2026-10-05
- Estimate change, 30 days$0.00 (0.0%) from $0.1, on 2026-08-31, 35-day window
- Readings revised upward0% of 8 comparable readings
The consensus estimate for the next reporting period, and how it has moved between readings of that SAME period. A change is measured only between readings estimating one period — when a company reports, the consensus moves to the next quarter and the two numbers are not comparable. Informational only, not a forecast and not advice.
Key risks (from latest filing)
["Risks associated with the July 2025 Oracle settlement and the mandatory wind-down of Oracle PeopleSoft support services by July 2028.","Intense competition from original enterprise software vendors pushing their own cloud-based upgrade and migration paths.","Challenges in scaling operations and incorporating AI technologies into the existing service model."]
What changed in the latest 10-Q
AI-assisted comparison of RMNI's 10-Q filed 2026-04-30 against the prior one filed 2025-10-30.
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
- Added:
- Added reference to 'Rimini Smart Path™' solutions portfolio and Agentic AI ERP solutions in newer filing
- Added 'budget' as a forward-looking indicator word in newer filing
- Added 'reflect' and 'results' as forward-looking indicator words in newer filing
- Added bullet point about ability to attract new clients or retain/sell additional products/services
- Added bullet point about ability to achieve and maintain adequate revenue growth rate
- Added bullet point about successfully educating market regarding support/managed services advantages for ERP
- Added bullet point about ability to scale operations quickly and decrease costs in response to changing demand
- Added bullet point about loss of management team members and attracting/retaining qualified personnel
- Added bullet point about ability to expand marketing and sales capabilities
- Added bullet point about avoiding service interruptions and degraded performance
- Added bullet point about defending against cybersecurity threats and data protection compliance
- Added reference to 'Rimini II litigation' in newer filing
- Added reference to 'Wind Down of support services for Oracle PeopleSoft' in newer filing
- Added reference to July 31, 2028 completion deadline for Wind Down in newer filing
- Added reference to 'macro-economic trends' wording in newer filing
- Added bullet point about need and ability to raise equity or debt financing
- Added reference to 'Part I, Item 1A' for Risk Factors location in newer filing
- Removed:
- Removed 'the evolution of the enterprise software management and support landscape' standalone bullet
- Removed 'the settlement agreement dated July 7, 2025' detailed description as standalone bullet
- Removed reference to 'Part II, Item 1A' for Risk Factors location in older filing
- Removed 'a failure by us to establish adequate reserves for tax events' bullet point
- Removed 'economic and industry trends or trend analysis' bullet point
- Removed 'our ability to maintain an effective system of internal control over financial reporting and our ability to remediate any identified material weaknesses' detailed version
- Removed reference to cybersecurity threats and AI deficiencies as combined single bullet in older version
- Reworded:
- Changed Settlement Agreement description from 'dated July 7, 2025' to 'continuing impact of the July 2025 Settlement Agreement' (newer)
- Changed 'wind down' to 'Wind Down' (capitalized) in newer filing
- Changed 'Oracle Corporation (and certain affiliates)' to 'certain affiliates of Oracle Corporation' in newer filing
- Changed 'the settlement agreement' reference from standalone item to integrated into forward-looking statement in newer filing
- Changed Risk Factors reference location from 'Part II, Item 1A' (older) to 'Part I, Item 1A' (newer)
- Reordered and reorganized bullet points significantly between versions
- Changed 'our ability to maintain an adequate rate of revenue growth' to separate bullets addressing ability to attract clients and achieve revenue growth in newer filing
- Separated AI technologies discussion into distinct risk areas in newer filing versus combined in older filing
- Changed final cautionary language ending (text cuts off in both, but reference structure differs)
- Notes:
- Both texts are truncated at the end, limiting full comparison of concluding language
- Bullet point reorganization makes direct line-by-line comparison challenging, but substantive content differences are identifiable
- Forward-looking indicator words list has minor formatting differences but same substantive content except for 'budget', 'reflect', and 'results' additions in newer filing
AI-assisted comparison of two SEC filing sections. It describes wording and theme changes only, makes no materiality, legal, or investment judgement, and is not financial advice. Informational only — not financial advice.
Insider activity (SEC Form 4)
0 open-market purchases and 4 open-market sales by insiders in the last 90 days, of which we have read Form 4 filings through 2026-10-04. The 5 days since 2026-10-04 have not been checked yet.
- Last 30 days · read to 2026-10-040 buys · 1 sell ($21294) — 1 selling insider
- Last 90 days · read to 2026-10-040 buys · 4 sells ($2M) — 2 selling insiders
- Last 180 days · read to 2026-10-040 buys · 16 sells ($2M) — 6 selling insiders
Activity heuristic: net selling (a transparent product heuristic from the counts above, not a prediction or advice)
Most recent open-market transaction: 2026-09-21. Based on Form 4 filings read through 2026-10-04; anything filed since is not yet included.
View full insider trading history → View SEC Form 3/4/5 filingsAsk about RMNI's insider activity →
Only open-market purchases (SEC code P) and sales (code S) are counted here. Option exercises, vesting/awards, gifts, and shares withheld for taxes are excluded — they are compensation or mechanical, not open-market conviction. Sales may be planned and non-discretionary (e.g. a Rule 10b5-1 plan) and are not necessarily bearish; open-market buying is not a recommendation to buy. Informational only — not financial advice.
Institutional ownership (13F)
5 institutional 13F filers reported holding RMNI as of 2026-06-30 (quarter-end position, filed within 45 days).
- Distinct 13F filers 5
- Reported shares held 5,508,258
- Reported value $23,465,177
reported quarterly holdings change (2026-03-31 → 2026-06-30): 0 new, 4 increased, 1 decreased, 0 exited. Change counts cover only managers that filed 13F reports in BOTH quarters, derived between two quarter-end snapshots — not same-day trades; a single manager is never said to have "bought" or "sold".
Institutional holdings are quarter-end long positions reported on SEC Form 13F-HR, filed up to 45 days after the quarter ends — they are delayed, are not real-time trades, exclude short positions and most non-US securities, and are not investment advice. Any increase/decrease is a reported change between two quarterly snapshots, not a same-day purchase or sale. These are quarter-end snapshots from the 13F filings on SEC EDGAR, filed within 45 days — not real-time, and any change is a difference between two quarterly reports, not a same-day trade. Informational only — not financial advice.
Ask about RMNI's institutional holders → See what each manager we track holds →
Short interest (FINRA)
RMNI had 2,701,644 shares of reported short interest as of the 2026-09-15 FINRA settlement date (delayed, bi-monthly; not real-time).
RMNI had 2.89% of its shares outstanding sold short as of the 2026-09-15 FINRA settlement date (percent of FLOAT would be higher — float is not disclosed in the source). FINRA reported 6 days to cover at the same settlement.
- Reported short interest (shares) 2,701,644
- Short interest (% of shares outstanding) 2.89%
- Prior settlement (shares) 2,378,692
- Reported change 13.58%
- Days to cover (reported) 6
Reported to FINRA as of the 2026-09-15 settlement date. Short interest is reported to FINRA and published on a delayed, bi-monthly schedule (as of a settlement date, disseminated roughly eight business days later) — it is NOT real-time, does not cover every venue or all US trading, and is not a short-squeeze prediction or investment advice. Days-to-cover is the value FINRA reports; percent of float is not shown because the source file carries no share-count denominator — where a percent appears it is of shares OUTSTANDING, the larger base, and is therefore a floor on percent of float. Informational only — not financial advice.
Competitors & peers
AI-enriched competitor set. Linked names are companies covered by stocks-llm; other named peers are shown for reference only.
Compare RMNI vs…
Frequently asked questions
What does RIMINI STREET INC (RMNI) do?
Rimini Street provides enterprise software support and managed services for enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems, allowing clients to maintain their existing software rather than migrating to new vendor versions. The company offers a portfolio of services under its "Rimini Smart Path" brand, including maintenance, security, and increasingly, AI-driven solutions for managing complex ERP environments.
What sector is RIMINI STREET INC (RMNI) in?
RIMINI STREET INC (RMNI) is classified in the Information Technology sector. Its industry is Enterprise Software Support & Managed Services. It trades on NASDAQ.
Who are RIMINI STREET INC's (RMNI) competitors?
Notable peers of RIMINI STREET INC (RMNI) include Oracle, SAP SE, IBM, Accenture and DXC Technology. This peer set is informational only — not financial advice.
Is RIMINI STREET INC (RMNI) overbought or oversold right now?
RIMINI STREET INC (RMNI) is currently neither overbought nor oversold — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 33, in the neutral middle (as of 2026-10-08). RSI describes recent price momentum, not a forecast — informational only, not financial advice.
Where does stocks-llm's data on RMNI come from?
Fundamentals come from SEC XBRL company filings for the figures marked with a fiscal year, and market data, as of 2026-09-02 for the rest; prices are market data, as of 2026-09-02; company filings and profile facts come from SEC EDGAR. All figures are delayed daily-close data shown with their as-of date — informational only, not financial advice.
Fundamentals: SEC XBRL company filings for the figures marked with a fiscal year, and market data, as of 2026-09-02 for the rest. Filings: SEC EDGAR. Prices are delayed daily-close data.
Last updated 2026-10-08.
Informational only — NOT financial advice. All figures are delayed daily-close data from SEC EDGAR & market data, shown with their as-of date.